Slashdot Mirror


User: Dog-Cow

Dog-Cow's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,362
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,362

  1. Re:Proprietary SW prohibits believing proprietors. on Apple Is Served A Search Warrant To Unlock Texas Church Gunman's iPhone (nydailynews.com) · · Score: 1

    We can't verify your source code, either, so we should be careful and crush you under 10000 pounds of concrete. Just because.

  2. Re:Hate Tesla on Walmart Says It's Preordered 15 of Tesla' New Semi Trucks (theverge.com) · · Score: 1

    It would be a good idea to have your mother fuck your ass with a rusty pickax.

  3. Re:So I don't get to write the program that I want on Google To Kill a Bunch of Useful Android Apps That Rely On Accessibility Services (androidpolice.com) · · Score: 2

    You are a stupid shit, so whether you try (and fail) to learn to program is immaterial.

    Google isn't stopping you from using these APIs in your own apps on your own device.

  4. Re:I've demod software that does 3D scanning from on Hackers Say They've Broken Face ID a Week After iPhone X Release (wired.com) · · Score: 1

    iOS has required a 6-digit PIN (or passphrase) to use TouchID for ages. I doubt they've regressed for FaceID.

  5. Re:Everyone but the marketing department knows... on Hackers Say They've Broken Face ID a Week After iPhone X Release (wired.com) · · Score: 1

    Whoever modded you insightful is as stupid and ignorant as you are.

  6. Re:FBI and NSA will love Face ID on Hackers Say They've Broken Face ID a Week After iPhone X Release (wired.com) · · Score: 2

    I have a radical idea. If you're doing something that might lead to your arrest, disable FaceId. And if you live in place where you might be arrested for looking at your shoes funny, don't enable it in the first place.

  7. Re:What is wrong with a passcode? on Hackers Say They've Broken Face ID a Week After iPhone X Release (wired.com) · · Score: 3, Funny

    If FaceId is a pain in the ass, you're holding it wrong.

  8. Re:The really funny part on Hackers Say They've Broken Face ID a Week After iPhone X Release (wired.com) · · Score: 0

    You've been able to do that for years. I think iOS 10 requires it. Ignorant shit pile.

  9. Re:Still ok for general consumers on Hackers Say They've Broken Face ID a Week After iPhone X Release (wired.com) · · Score: 1

    You should have your face bashed in, just for being such an ignorant, stupid, fuck-up.

  10. Re:Still ok for general consumers on Hackers Say They've Broken Face ID a Week After iPhone X Release (wired.com) · · Score: 1

    If the CEO is a stupid shit, short the stock and let him do what he wants. Don't make up stupid scenarios that have no basis in reality.

  11. Re:Noit a secret on Hackers Say They've Broken Face ID a Week After iPhone X Release (wired.com) · · Score: 0

    I suppose it did not occur to you that you're an ignorant shit. And extremely imbecilic, to boot.

  12. Re: MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP on Researchers Run Unsigned Code on Intel ME By Exploiting USB Ports (thenextweb.com) · · Score: 1

    You deserve to have a rusty spike shoved through your eyeball.

  13. Re:Is the phone locked or encrypted? on iPhone Encryption Hampers Investigation of Texas Shooter, Says FBI (chron.com) · · Score: 1

    If you don't understand that iPhones have been encrypting their storage contents since at least the iPhone 5s, you are hopeless, and no one will ever be able to explain it to you, because you are dumb.

  14. Re: It's worth pointing out... on iPhone Encryption Hampers Investigation of Texas Shooter, Says FBI (chron.com) · · Score: 1

    he wouldn't have been able to hit a fucking thing.

    Were there people fucking at that concert? If not, I don't see how that matters. In any event, are you so stupid as to imply that firing into a crowd of thousands would have been ineffective if was using a bump fire stock? Because he wasn't aiming at particular people, you know.

  15. Re:Augmented Reality on Apple Plans To Start Selling Its AR Headset By 2020, Bloomberg Says (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    That would require VR.

  16. You'd be better off if you jumped in front of a real train instead of off a metaphorical one.

  17. Re:I don't care about cool... on Apache OpenOffice: We're OK With Not Being Super Cool (theregister.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    You should have your head ripped off and used as a paperweight. It would then be doing something useful.

  18. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works on EPA Approves Release of Bacteria-Carrying Mosquitoes To 20 States (nature.com) · · Score: 1

    Unless they force you to go back, too, that plan is pointless.

  19. Re: "Not possible to be fair" on The US Is Now the Only Country In the World To Reject the Paris Climate Deal · · Score: 2

    You are literally the most stupid person you know.

  20. Re: 8x more powerful X zero chain reaction = 0 on 'Quark Fusion' Produces Eight Times More Energy Than Nuclear Fusion (futurism.com) · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You need to kill yourself. Please swallow some boiling lead.

  21. Re:Secure Windows is a phrase that means... on Microsoft Releases Standards For Highly Secure Windows 10 Devices (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    In most of the world, you'd be slapped in the head with a 1/2" steel bar until it was a pulpy mess. You're lucky to live where you are, but no one else is.

  22. How does fingerprinting someone prevent assault? It's not as if Uber doesn't know who the driver was if an assault is reported by a passenger.

  23. Re:As someone who lives in Florida on Florida Attempts the Largest Hydraulic Restoration Project In the World To Save the Everglades (vice.com) · · Score: 1

    Take down things like dikes [sic] and dames...

    What do you have against women?

  24. Re:Apple tax on Paradise Papers Leak Reveals Apple's Secret Tax Bolthole (bbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Good. More for people who matter.

  25. Re:"extremely sensitive concerning publicity" on Paradise Papers Leak Reveals Apple's Secret Tax Bolthole (bbc.com) · · Score: 0

    You write “correct”, and then go on to completely disagree. Almost as if you’re competing for most-stupid-of-the-year.