One uses chemical properties (density) to enable a greater kinetic energy and thus more easily penetrate armoured targets. The other uses a nuclear warhead to blow stuff up, big time.
Have you ever heard that every discussion on the internet, if it runs long enough, will lead to a Hitler/Nazi comparison?
The parent sure has a valid point, though: That video is pretty much on the same level as Nazi propaganda, only far less spectacular.
Frankly, these provocations won't help anyone. I do believe most of those people could learn quite a bit about democracy, freedom of speech, cooperation and tolerance. However, provoking them is asking for troube, since they don't yet respect the aforementioned principles and still seriously listen to religious extremists.
I understood your complain and dismissed it as something easily mechanized.
As for microUSB 3.0, I meant that its connector is only slightly larger than the microUSB 2.0 connector. The design seems somewhat rushed, I'll give you that, but then again, we're nowhere near needing USB 3.0 for phones, so there's still hope for a better connector
After using your device for one or two weeks, you have the process mechanized. Nobody ever complained that microUSB or Apple's dock connector didn't go in both ways, but if Apple suddenly gives everyone an excuse to be lazy, damned be standards and all other concerns, we can plug it in upside down!
Also, microUSB 3.0 is only slightly larger than the standard port and is backwards compatible. Considering phones have a pretty hard time staurating USB 2.0, it's not much of a concern, either.
It sure is cheaper than when I checked, but there are still a few problems: 1) They don't sell it in stores (at least not in Portugal) 2) 8£/10$/10€ buys me two bargain bin microUSB cables or one good microUSB cables 3) They're not keeping with the spirit of the agreement 4) Their insane profit margin means they can include their 0,50€ adapter with their 600€/700€/840€ phones without raising the price
I've had microUSB connectors go through more than 1000 insertion/removal cycles, with no problems at all so far.
They are no looser? The cable works exactly as well?
I treat the cables gently and still have some fail on me (I use them for camera gear). Cheap connectors in devices often do not hold the cables well and get worse over time.
My relatively old Nokia charger (which I've kept using because it supplies 1.2A, unlike most USB chargers) works just as well as it did on day one, going through at least one cycle per day, often two cycles or more. I also have a Nokia USB to microUSB cable that's been around just as long (though it hasn't seen nearly as much use), that I kept using because it has a sort of plastic cable holder, which is useful to keep it in a tidy shape. Both work perfectly. The charger was even crushed once (probably got stuck under some furniture) and had its locking tabs stuck, so it was loose inside the device's port. Still managed to fix it with a needle and it's still working perfectly. The devices themselves should see minimal wear, as it's the cable that locks, unlike USB and miniUSB, where the port locks.
Quite the contrary. I might have seriously considered an iPhone if it weren't for the proprietary stuff. Being able to use my existing microUSB cables and chargers, while adding some features (even if they're proprietary) without having to pay for or carry around an adapter is non-negotiable.
I suspect Apple has valid reasons as they want data transfer to be as fast as possible with their proprietary adaptors, but still allow micro-usb charging if people want it.
That one made me laugh! So, adding a weird plug makes USB go faster?
I've had microUSB connectors go through more than 1000 insertion/removal cycles, with no problems at all so far.
Also, the iPhone does not ship with the microUSB adapter. I know that from experience, and Apple just confirmed they won't be doing that with the iPhone 5 either.
Apple has also used a proprietary method of signalling that devices can draw more than 500mA from the USB port. Nokia has stuck with its connectors for quite a while (two sizes, older adapters can use a simple adapter to charge), even supporting them after adopting microUSB (Symbian^3 phones charge via microUSB and their charging connector). Apple's Dock Connector actually dropped firewire charging (which was very popular with docks) 4 years ago, so it hasn't been kept fully compatible, either.
Please, name one phone with a proprietary solution to output A/V, besides the iPhone. Even then, you can keep your phone working without proprietary crap.
You're missing a small but very important detail: Apple does not include the necessary adapter, which was part of the agreement. The claim that microUSB can't safely supply 2A seems a bit farfetched, but the iPad is irrelevant here because it's not a phone and it hasn't been updated yet.
Yes, up until recently, everybody had their own connectors. For quite a few years now, everyone has been moving to microUSB, and the iPhones must be the only smartphones that still do not charge via a microUSB port.
Who cares if it's not really microUSB (besides the USB forum)? It works with anything designed for microUSB, and adds a couple of useful features. Sounds like win/win to me.
They are fine with it, but Apple never included it with the iPhones. That's the real issue - they want people to pay for the "privilege" of using microUSB
Slashdot Mirror
Depleted Uranium penetrators =|= nuclear-tipped missiles
One uses chemical properties (density) to enable a greater kinetic energy and thus more easily penetrate armoured targets.
The other uses a nuclear warhead to blow stuff up, big time.
It was obvious by the Cray 2 / iPad 2 comparison that this is BS.
Sure it does, it's the 4 on a keypad
The problem isn't as much Islam as the assholes who put themselves in charge of preaching "Islam" to the masses.
Just because the Catholic church is a mess (and it's gotten much better), doesn't mean Christianity is bad.
Have you ever heard that every discussion on the internet, if it runs long enough, will lead to a Hitler/Nazi comparison?
The parent sure has a valid point, though: That video is pretty much on the same level as Nazi propaganda, only far less spectacular.
Frankly, these provocations won't help anyone. I do believe most of those people could learn quite a bit about democracy, freedom of speech, cooperation and tolerance. However, provoking them is asking for troube, since they don't yet respect the aforementioned principles and still seriously listen to religious extremists.
Not having your DS charged is hardly a problem, unlike your phone.
Holy crap, and I thought getting 4x 4GB or 2x 8GB for 20€ two years ago was a good deal.
I understood your complain and dismissed it as something easily mechanized.
As for microUSB 3.0, I meant that its connector is only slightly larger than the microUSB 2.0 connector. The design seems somewhat rushed, I'll give you that, but then again, we're nowhere near needing USB 3.0 for phones, so there's still hope for a better connector
What I mean is that the iPad is not marketed as a phone and thus not covered by the agreement to use microUSB for charging.
Should've specified - the cable isn't removable, it's fixed to the charger itself. 3 years and going strong.
No, it doesn't. I know, I've bought two. Guess how many adapters I've received. None.
Please, stop spreading disinformation.
After using your device for one or two weeks, you have the process mechanized. Nobody ever complained that microUSB or Apple's dock connector didn't go in both ways, but if Apple suddenly gives everyone an excuse to be lazy, damned be standards and all other concerns, we can plug it in upside down!
Also, microUSB 3.0 is only slightly larger than the standard port and is backwards compatible. Considering phones have a pretty hard time staurating USB 2.0, it's not much of a concern, either.
I'm sorry, let me rephrase:
"the iPhones must be the only smartphones that still do not natively accept a microUSB cable for charging."
It may not be microUSB, but it's compatible and adds new stuff. Where's the problem in that? I'd be okay with it if Apple had done it.
It sure is cheaper than when I checked, but there are still a few problems:
1) They don't sell it in stores (at least not in Portugal)
2) 8£/10$/10€ buys me two bargain bin microUSB cables or one good microUSB cables
3) They're not keeping with the spirit of the agreement
4) Their insane profit margin means they can include their 0,50€ adapter with their 600€/700€/840€ phones without raising the price
I've had microUSB connectors go through more than 1000 insertion/removal cycles, with no problems at all so far.
They are no looser? The cable works exactly as well?
I treat the cables gently and still have some fail on me (I use them for camera gear). Cheap connectors in devices often do not hold the cables well and get worse over time.
My relatively old Nokia charger (which I've kept using because it supplies 1.2A, unlike most USB chargers) works just as well as it did on day one, going through at least one cycle per day, often two cycles or more. I also have a Nokia USB to microUSB cable that's been around just as long (though it hasn't seen nearly as much use), that I kept using because it has a sort of plastic cable holder, which is useful to keep it in a tidy shape. Both work perfectly.
The charger was even crushed once (probably got stuck under some furniture) and had its locking tabs stuck, so it was loose inside the device's port. Still managed to fix it with a needle and it's still working perfectly.
The devices themselves should see minimal wear, as it's the cable that locks, unlike USB and miniUSB, where the port locks.
Just my experience with microUSB.
Lightning is, in all likelihood, just USB + general use pins, like the old dock connector.
Besides, if they really needed something faster, there's always microUSB 3.0.
Quite the contrary. I might have seriously considered an iPhone if it weren't for the proprietary stuff. Being able to use my existing microUSB cables and chargers, while adding some features (even if they're proprietary) without having to pay for or carry around an adapter is non-negotiable.
I suspect Apple has valid reasons as they want data transfer to be as fast as possible with their proprietary adaptors, but still allow micro-usb charging if people want it.
That one made me laugh! So, adding a weird plug makes USB go faster?
I've had microUSB connectors go through more than 1000 insertion/removal cycles, with no problems at all so far.
Also, the iPhone does not ship with the microUSB adapter. I know that from experience, and Apple just confirmed they won't be doing that with the iPhone 5 either.
Apple has been complying since that ruling was made, they give European buyers a little adapter.
No, they don't. They sell it. For 20 bucks (dock connector) or 30 bucks (Lightning).
Apple has also used a proprietary method of signalling that devices can draw more than 500mA from the USB port.
Nokia has stuck with its connectors for quite a while (two sizes, older adapters can use a simple adapter to charge), even supporting them after adopting microUSB (Symbian^3 phones charge via microUSB and their charging connector). Apple's Dock Connector actually dropped firewire charging (which was very popular with docks) 4 years ago, so it hasn't been kept fully compatible, either.
Please, name one phone with a proprietary solution to output A/V, besides the iPhone. Even then, you can keep your phone working without proprietary crap.
You're missing a small but very important detail: Apple does not include the necessary adapter, which was part of the agreement.
The claim that microUSB can't safely supply 2A seems a bit farfetched, but the iPad is irrelevant here because it's not a phone and it hasn't been updated yet.
Yes, up until recently, everybody had their own connectors. For quite a few years now, everyone has been moving to microUSB, and the iPhones must be the only smartphones that still do not charge via a microUSB port.
Who cares if it's not really microUSB (besides the USB forum)? It works with anything designed for microUSB, and adds a couple of useful features. Sounds like win/win to me.
They are fine with it, but Apple never included it with the iPhones. That's the real issue - they want people to pay for the "privilege" of using microUSB