Slashdot Mirror
iPhone 5 Scorns Standards Promise To European Commission
WebMink writes "Back in 2009, Apple signed an agreement aimed at reducing electronic waste resulting from mobile phone accessories. But this week's launch of the iPhone 5 shows them reneging on that commitment. Instead of including a micro-USB connector on the iPhone, as they agreed to do along with the rest of the phone industry, they created yet another proprietary connector. At a stroke, they have junked earlier iPhone accessories, forced a new industry in Apple-only accessories to arise and broken their promise to the EC. It's a huge missed opportunity both for their customers and for the environment."
Someone should sue them for this shit.
I was under the impression that Apple's dock connectors were designed such that they could be plugged into various accessories (speaker docks, etc.) without the need for a lot of processing power to play music and such.
Wouldn't using USB make this a major challenge for the companies building the accessories? After all, USB requires some heavy lifting on the host side.
There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
that his products still "sticks it to the man". I can picture him flipping the bird to EC...
Previewing comments are for sissies!
From TFA:
"Which is the agreed common interface?
On the basis of the Micro-USB interface, the companies have agreed to develop a common specification in order to allow for full compatibility of chargers and mobile phones. These specifications have been translated in European standards.
N.B.: The agreement allows for the use of an adaptor."
Apple supplies adaptors, therefore they're not "scorning" the agreement.
Apple ships a Micro-USB adaptor with every iPhone in the EU.
The new connector is not a missed opportunity. Micro-USB sucks, the cables suck, the connectors are weak and prone to failure - not to mention by any measure it's superior to have a directionless connector. How is it better for the environment to buy cables more often?
And what about the NUMBER of micro-USB connectors. There are at least three that look nearly alike, I'm sure one of them is the official Micro-USB connector but how can you tell when you have multiple cables each with slightly different tiny connectors?
I would say the EU has failed you all by locking the nation into a poor standard for all phones to have to use, instead of allowing companies to continue to iterate over better connector designs. Instead you wound up with the least common denominator of connectors, dooming yourself to poor power transfer abilities and as I said badly designed connectors prone to breaking.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Why don't Apple's competitors get EU countries to ban import because they are not following trade agreements?
All this complaining is so lame.
If you don't like the connector, then grow some fucking balls and don't buy the product. Period. As for me - don't have an iPhone/iPad/iWhatever and don't want an iPhone/iPad/iWhatever - and the same for Android whatever too.
As for the bitching about changing the connector - so, what, are they supposed to make one connector and then support it forever, never changing it? How long is long enough? It's been TEN YEARS! Christ - you're lucky it made it THAT long. Besides which, if you keep using the product (Phone/Pod/whatever) you bought for your whatever, you will run into no problems with the connection at all.
All connectors wear out. Id micro usb the best possible? No. But it strikes a good compromise and likely does reduce wast, though I have no studies to back that up.
Apple: The bottom line and 'image' are most important. To that end we only play at giving an actual two shits about you, our workers, and the environment.
Silence is a state of mime.
I still don't really understand the rationale behind the new connector. It seems the whole motivation for it was to make the iPhone thinner... which, I don't see as a real selling point at this point, especially given all the frustration with having to replace accessories or buy a new set of $30 adapters, and the fact that the iPhone 4s is really thin enough. As for simplicity, it really goes against the Apple aesthetic. One picture from the event made that evident.
Meanwhile, the rest of the industry seems to be moving away from wires and toward wireless. Wireless payments, wireless charging, wireless audio, etc. with NFC and other related technologies. Apple is for some strange reason the last to adopt these innovations, and it will be a whole year before they come up with an answer. In the mean time, they're piling on connectors and dongles galore. It's very strange.
The proprietary connector, whether it's the old one or the new one, is the reason I don't buy Apple gadgets (although I do buy and love Apple's laptops). The recent development that all devices use microusb for charging is the best thing ever. I can charge my Kindle, cellphone, cordless mouse, and bluetooth hands-free, all with the same, omnipresent standard cable.
A couple of years ago, I worked in a small desert town in Iran. I had forgotten to bring the Apple cord for my iPod Touch. I had any number of "normal" usb cords available, including micro and mini, but there was no place where I could get hold of an Apple cord. My iPod was useless. I can't believe they still haven't wised up to the idea of a standard connector.
Certainly a pet peeve of mine. If it wasn't for the stupid connector, my awesome Macbook Pro would be connected to an iPhone right now, instead of to a Galaxy S3.
The new adaptor is cheaper and more useable.
But basically the EU can choose: either you get what comes out or you get to wait until 2014.
Your choice.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
If you invest in accessories for the new connector, you'll be less inclined to buy a non-Apple phone.
Perhaps their connector has additional pins for HDMI, but they could have placed a real HDMI connector beside the USB connector for easy docking. Alternately, they could sell a dongle to pipe HDMI video out from USB2 as other manufacturers already do.
But then they couldn't lock their customers in and charge exorbitant licensing fees for their connector.
So you don't want your phone using the battery while it is sitting in a dock? That doesn't make any sense. The dock charges the battery so there no reason that a bit of extra processing will make a bit of a difference.
Do you have any ideas for interesting application that the CPU cycles can be used for while it is sitting in said dock?
Geez, nice hyperbolic story.
First, Apple is keeping to the requirement by offering a micro-USB cable.
Second, the reason they didn't use micro-USB is because it doesn't have the requisite number of pins. As we saw with Thunderbolt, the USB folks will *not* allow you to add non-standard pins to their connector.
This connector must support at least 2 amps of charging for the iPad (in the future presumably). That puts micro-USB right out of the picture.
It must also support digitally sending all the data necessary to support the 30-pin compatibility, including the upcoming HDMI and VGA adapters. Building any sort of intelligence into the cable or other end would require an actual USB interface chip and would require extending the USB specification in non-standard ways... not that you could push enough data on the 2 data pins to run a 720p HD display anyway, unless you piggy-backed some custom protocol on top of USB, then had some sort of hand-shake mode to figure that out... assuming the USB people didn't sue you for abusing their standard to begin with.
The connector itself is far better designed than any USB connector ever; it is reversible and it has self-cleaning contacts, yet it is stronger than micro-usb.
It's OK though; I expect a barrage of anti-Apple FUD every time they release a new device. I'm used to it by now. If you want a legit complaint, the price of the 30-pin adapters is ridiculous.
Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdIWKytq_q4
Enjoy watching Apple fans "fall in love" with the "new" iPhone 5 !
(Spoiler: they're all playing with an iPhone 4s, thinking it's the new iPhone 5)
. . . to tell everyone else what to buy and what not to buy.
Apple ships a generic USB charger. It has a USB A hole on one end and comes with a cable designed to convert that to whatever hole Apple put on the phone. If you want a microUSB plug end, just get a USB A - to microUSB cable and you're done with it. When you dispose of your iPhone, you're free to keep the generic USB charger and use it on your next iPhone, of Galaxy S12 or whatever. The only eWaste is the proprietary cable. Now granted, you can't use a microUSB charger with a captive USB cable on it to charge your iPhone, but I'd argue the captive cable problem is more wasteful than what Apple does.
This is just another misleading story - Apple actually has complied by providing an adaptor for charging. They specification that they are adhering to is the Common External Power Supply and allows the use of adaptors. They already have on for older type of dock connector. I suspect Apple has valid reasons as they want data transfer to be as fast as possible with their proprietary adaptors, but still allow micro-usb charging if people want it.
Technically, Apple IS compliant.
From the agreement at http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise
Undertaking 4.2.1 states that “if a manufacturer makes available an Adaptor from the Micro-USB connector of a Common EPS to a specific non-Micro-USB socket in the Mobile Phone, it shall constitute compliance”. Annex II futher states that “An EPS provided with a detachable cable shall be equipped with a USB Standard-A receptacle. Above requirement also applies to detachable cables used as adaptor i.e. where the Micro-B is replaced by a proprietary plug”
Switching to just a micro-USB would have been stupid as you can't get analog audio or HD video through USB 2.0. Still I feel for all the people who've invested in accessories that use the standar Apple 30-pin. Expensive accessories like docks, iHome clocks, etc.
Wireless payments, wireless charging, wireless audio, etc. with NFC and other related technologies.
Apple has adopted Bluetooth LE (as have other companies) which allow all those things to occur. NFC is not required for any of those things.
Furthermore Apple instead of providing NFC, has a much more practical means (for the U.S.) of electronic payment in Passbook. There's almost no NFC support in the U.S..
Apple of course also heavily promotes AirPlay, which is quite wireless...
In the mean time, they're piling on connectors and dongles galore. It's very strange.
They are not "piling on" anything. They fully support Bluetooth LE as noted, they are simply changing out a connector standard for something more modern. Who would not prefer to have charging and video output options that all come out of a single port? It also allows for faster charging than you could have if you simply support USB, important for tablets.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
If it is a "bad deal", Apple's competitors will eat the "Apple" marketshare up.
I can see the need to modernize connectors and to present the best you can to give long term value to customers over a long time period, just like the prior connector.
The future iPhones will break traditions again and people will keep saying "but it isn't like other smartphones."
The only thing needed is to answer customer needs. For me that is lighter, smaller, more adaptable to varying use conditions.
I have to make a correction here. Apple doesn't SUPPLY the adapter, but it does make one available for you to BUY
In the EU they DO ship with a Lightning->MicroUSB port.
You are probably thinking about the U.S., where it does NOT ship with a Lightning->iPod 30-pin adaptor. But it does ship with a Lightning->USB cable to connect to any standard USB port... if you can connect to a standard USB port already does it matter so much if there's an adaptor? It's mostly for accessories.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Dock's weren't the only accessory that used that connector. Example: I have a dongle for connecting to Ant+ sensors (Heart-Rate, Cadence, Stride, etc..). That's not going to charge it while consuming the extra power.
Someone posted some interesting points in the linked article, I've pasted it here. ( Don't shoot the messenger who is an android fan.) Discuss... *** “Apple has reneged on that commitment to the European Commission to change to micro-USB”. This is simply false. Undertaking 4.2.1 states that “if a manufacturer makes available an Adaptor from the Micro-USB connector of a Common EPS to a specific non-Micro-USB socket in the Mobile Phone, it shall constitute compliance”. —http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise... Annex II futher states that “An EPS provided with a detachable cable shall be equipped with a USB Standard-A receptacle. Above requirement also applies to detachable cables used as adaptor i.e. where the Micro-B is replaced by a proprietary plug” —http:// ec.europa.eu/enterprise... Apple’s decision not to use a Micro-USB connector is in keeping with the agreement, as they also offer a Micro-USB to Lightning adaptor. Their charger also appears to be a common EPS, so that any USB-A to Micro-USB cable can be used with it to charge any other compliant phone; and the iPhone 5 can be charge from any other common EPS with a detachable cable (i.e. with a USB-A port, as per the standard."
The question is if all of the older accessories will work with the adapter. If they do, the main thrust of this complaint is misguided. If they don't, then it's spot on.
seems pretty reasonable to me--it's not like apple is changing it every year.
whats the matter? can't trade your foodstamps for a new adapter?
I used micro usb for 3 years until I switched to the iphone and hated the micro-usb. Doesn't fit tight, always had bad connections, only fits one way, etc.
If Apple's new connector has a more snug fit, doesn't loose any features from the 30pin connector and fixes the other things then I am all for it. It sucks that the old iphone connector is going away, but if they are going to make things smaller then the connector has to be smaller as well. Heck the 30 pin connector has been around for how many years!
To follow standards I first thought the same they should use the micro-usb then I thought how much I hated it and hoping the new Apple connector will fix its weaknesses then who cares. I'm sure third parties will make the cables as well and will be cheap instead of having to buy the $30 apple ones so no big deal here.
But i'm sure the anti-Apple crowd will stir up a huge debate over the issue.
Ah thanks for the clarification, I had forgotten about that type of add-on accessory.
There's a stockpile of copper in China. Somebody has to use it. Trouble is, I don't think there's going to be anywhere near as much copper going into these connectors as went into all the empty skyscrapers they built.
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
I suspect Apple has valid reasons as they want data transfer to be as fast as possible with their proprietary adaptors, but still allow micro-usb charging if people want it.
That one made me laugh! So, adding a weird plug makes USB go faster?
I think it's interesting to note that htc developed a 12 pin connector compatible with standard mini usb cables and their connector, yet apple, who is supposed to be the father of all things innovative has to create a whole new proprietary connector to get 8 pins. http://pinouts.ru/images/htc_headset.gif
Soon they're gonna make you buy an iVan der Graaf iGenerator
Dock's weren't the only accessory that used that connector. Example: I have a dongle for connecting to Ant+ sensors (Heart-Rate, Cadence, Stride, etc..). That's not going to charge it while consuming the extra power.
Huh? Consuming what extra power? Did you forget what was being discussed here, or does your Heart-Rate monitor play back music?
They get a cut of everything you buy for an apple device so there is a huge incentive for Apple to make a new proprietary connector for each edition of it's products. If you keep buying Apple, you're a fool throwing money down a bottomless Apple pit.
Tell, me, please, where you got the idea the Apple's proprietary royalty-laden connector requires no CPU time to decode input...
The solution for the EC is simple, if they really aren't compliant.
They just have to recall at apple's expense all non-compliant devices, and 3 party adaptors, and make apple replace them all.
Problem solved.
I could be wrong (if so someone is sure to tell me) but I'm pretty sure Apple got an exemption from that European rule.
Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
> I suspect Apple has valid reasons as they want data transfer to be as fast as possible with their proprietary adaptors, but still allow micro-usb charging if people want it.
Yeahhhh.... my BS detector just blew a circuit breaker. I hate it when that happens.
Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
Go back and reread this with open eyes, folks. The EU standard is about charging.
Do none of you remember the last 10 years where you had custom chargers? And even if it was USB port SHAPED, you had to still have proprietary charger to "activate" it? ( here's looking at you Motorola )
Apple has ALWAYS been compliant with this. Since the ipod days even... ( post firewaire anyway ) You don't have to use their charger to charge their devices.
You can plug it into any USB charger.
And now Apple is still compliant with this standard. The iPhone 5 comes with a USB charging cable.
Done and Done. Get over yourself.
If I was the Commissioner in charge of this I would slap Apple with a fine and force them to give a free adapter to everyone which has an Apple phone.
Jimmy Kimmel passed off an iphone4 as an iphone 5 to get reactions from the street, hilarious! http://www.youtube.com/watch?nomobile=1&v=rdIWKytq_q4
maybe in the future it will convert body energy into battery charging?
If you don't like it, don't buy one. It's that simple.
For actual reasons why Apple didn't go with a micro-USB connector, check out Boom.
If the UEC had any willpower they would ban the import of the Iphone5 and sue Apple for breach of contract. But we all know that won't happen. Evil will always triumph because good is dumb.
Yes, well thankfully being a commissioner doesn't actually allow you to do whatever you damn well please. Apple's adapter solution is specifically allowed for in the MOU.
Lightning to Lightning may well be faster. Which may prove useful in the future as Lightning peripherals come along.
The goal is that in the long term "everyone" has a whole bunch of micro-USB chargers at home
Then the iPhone is already on target. It ships with a USB charger into which you can plug ANY USB cable. The Apple Lightning cable is only proprietary at one end, on the other end it's a standard USB cable for connecting to a computer or charger.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Apple stuff is more environmentally friendly because it is re-used, repaired and re-purposed much more often then android equipment. With the large numbers of each Apple iPhone made there are larger stocks of replacement parts. If a screen breaks on a HTC phone you have to pay more for that part if you can find it at all, on iPhone they are readily available. People do not often throw them out or toss them in a drawer till they are trash... they sell them or give them away and they find another life. I have not tossed a single iPhone nor do I know anyone who has. I know of people with hold phones like the g1 and the Samsung captivate that just are not worth dealing with as used. Have an old Apple 30 pin adapter? I bet you know a ton of people who could use it. If not only the cable is wasted, the charging block is good for any USB device.
Yes, new items will increase waste (old items), increase production of new items (emissions), and cause problems for the consumer (multiple cables). So... unless you have some magical idea that will remove all of this, it will harm the environment.
And what Android devices do not come with a cable, expecting you to reuse your old cable. So an iOS device comes with a cable and an Android devices comes with a cable. Same waste (old items), same increased production (emissions). It seems the only real criticism is needing multiple cables for people who own both platforms.
just because some eurobureaucrats decide so it doesnt mean it makes any sense ! Just look at the mess Europe is now ! JUST THANKS to stupid decisions like imposing absurd regulations instead of letting the free market and best of breed technology prevail. Another blalantly stupid Eurobureaucratic law states that electric plugs adaptors should all be shucko, possibly THE worst, most wasteful plug type ever invented, but of course it's designe in Germay so must be good , right ?
Christ. It seems like every article about Apple here is Chock-full of vitriol and anti-Apple propaganda. I'm sick of it. They aren't the best company in the world but people actually LIKE the products they make. It's not that they're "sheeple", Apple's products are actually appealing. Stop lambasting the company just because they're on top. It's starting to get even more ridiculous than the old Microsoft/Evil Empire routine - and so far, Apple hasn't pulled half the shit those guys did.
As for the.dock connection. Micro-USB doesn't have the necessary signals And bandwidth to do what Apple wants to do over a cable. That's it, end of story. No evil master plan, no nefarious intent. The hardware wasn't a match for their intended capabilities.
And no, I'm not a "fanboi" (can we please stop using that label? It's an insulting stereotype). My primary phone is an HTC One X. Sitting in my desk drawer next to me: Nexus One, Samsung Galaxy S2 and an HTC Sensation 4G. I've also got a Nexus 7 and Transformer Prime tablet... And yes, there's an iPad and an iPhone 4S here too. And on top of all that, I was an embedded Linux develop for years, working on tablet devices back when at least half of you were still in high school. So fuck yeah, I know some shit about open hardware and software.
But hey, why listen to me? Go wrap yourselves in your name warm blankets of righteous open source Apple hatred and take a nice nap. You'll feel better in the morning.
The EU is concentrating on the wrong end of the charging cable. If they really cared for the environment they would mandate that phone come only with a charging cable, and that having a simple USB A plug. The real problem is the unnecessary transformers on the wall side...
Quite off topic but I can't help to say it: it's amazing how Apple, in the iPhone5 video, mentions the new connector as a new feature, and as if it was a gift from God, they say that it's reversible.
We can not deny they're marketing genius, the way they do those videos with Jony Ive and the other guy acting skills describing characteristics already in other devices as a incredible step in technology history, like LTE.
"We've created the new, much smaller lightning connector." Wow, what would this world be without it?
"And we made it reversible, so it fits either way." Thanks for explaining me that it fits either way, when I heard reversible, I did not catch it.
(My karma went from "Excellent" to "Good" recently, don't be so hard, please).
If you read the linked-to page about the agreement, you'll see that the title is "One charger for all - Frequently asked questions", emphasis mine. The first FAQ, "What's the issue?", says:
and the second FAQ, "What is the solution envisaged?", says:
The astute reader will note that a certain word that begins with "c" and ends with "harger" appears quite frequently in those items. This was not about "mobile phone accessories" in general, it was about a particular accessory, namely the charger, so "they have junked earlier iPhone accessories, forced a new industry in Apple-only accessories to arise" is 100% irrelevant to the MoU.
As for the charging part - the only part relevant to the "promise to the EC" - TFMoU explicitly says that "[making] available an Adaptor from the Micro-USB connector of a Common EPS to a specific non-Micro-USB socket in the Mobile Phone" is sufficient to ensure compliance. Perhaps Apple phones sold within the EU should ship with that adaptor, rather than selling it as an add-on, but that's another matter.
Now, TFMoU also says that the Signatories:
where an "EPS" is an external power supply and
so if, for example, the Apple USB Power Adapter sold in one EU country doesn't provide "a Micro-USB B-Plug attached via a cable which delivers power to the device being charged", then they're not conforming to that part of TFMoU. At least from the picture, it offers what appears to be a USB 2.0 Group 7 - Standard “A” Receptacle, rather than a "USB 2.0 Group 7 – Micro-USB B-Plug", so, unless it includes a cable that plugs into the Standard A-Receptacle and has a Micro-USB B-Plug, they aren't complying - and the Apple page says they include an "Apple Dock Connector to USB Cable", which plugs into the Standard A-Receptacle but has an Old Fashioned 30-Pin Apple Dock Connector, so no go.
So maybe the title should be changed to "Apple USB Power Adapter Scorns Standard Promise To European Commission", as the iPhone 5 does something that TFMoU considers OK.
The amount of emotional apoplexy over this fucking connector is pathetic.
Have you dumb fucks read the news lately? Do you have any clue in those geek pea brains what the ever loving fuck is going on in this world right now?
The geek community is one gigantic embarrassment operating at the lowest level of intellect possible. Fuck every single one of you sideways, you pathetic loser shits.
On the other side, you can find people moking Apple because their Lightning/USB cable (currently) only support USB2.0 and not USB3.0.
However, USB2.0 is MUUUUUUUUUUUCH faster than LTE or WiFi n.
So, you can't go all wireless until wireless has leaped the bandwidth of wired connections.
Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
Laughed myself sick when I saw this story right next to Monkeys made smarter with prosthetic device.
I own a Galaxy S3 and the phone is currently connected to my PC (and being charged) with a standard micro USB cable... an this is the first time I've heard about it not having a real micro USB connector. I guess that the distinction matters if you want to repair your own phone and the Samsung connectors are somehow harder to come by...? But most of time, all I care about is being able to say "Damn, I'm low on power... Do you have a cable I could charge my phone with?" when I'm visiting friends that have different phones than I do.
You NEED 10A for your iPad? Jeesus, that's inefficient.
Lightning is, in all likelihood, just USB + general use pins, like the old dock connector.
Besides, if they really needed something faster, there's always microUSB 3.0.
Which is the agreed common interface?
On the basis of the Micro-USB interface, the companies have agreed to develop a common specification in order to allow for full compatibility of chargers and mobile phones. These specifications have been translated in European standards.
N.B.: The agreement allows for the use of an adaptor.
Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
Actually I think that Apple go one better than the EU standard. A lot of iDevices (such as the nano, touch?) ship without a charger. All you get is a cable to connect your iDevice to a standard USB port on a computer or USB charger wall-wart (which you can purchase separately in the unlikely event that you don't already have one).
Result - no power supply to throw away at the end of life.
As to the change from the old 30-pin connector to lightning - I think that was going to happen anyway at some point. How many Samsung/Nokia/LG/Motorola phones have kept the same connector for the last 10 years? Devices have come down in size to the point where making them any smaller (or thinner) would have been impossible withoug getting rid of the old connector.
What most people care about is that their new iDevice comes with a cable that they can use to connect it to a computer/wall wart for charging purposes.
So long as Apple keep the same connector format for the next 10 or so years, accessoies will catch up quite quickly. I don't see most people having a problem with that.
Apple should be banned from selling all its products in Europe for pulling a stunt like this
If I were Apple I wouldn't give a rats ass what the EU wants. There isn't a law that requires them to use USB so they should do what the decide is the best way to go. Random countries in Europe are always flogging apple in their courts over stupid shit so I would have told them to piss off as well. Never let the government dictate what is the best course of action for anything. They really suck at it.
There also isn't any standard for how you can get video data off of a USB 3.0 port in On-the-Go mode. In theory you can do this, USB 3.0 has the bandwidth to to this, but converting that signal into something that you can connect to a monitor is going to require some sort of external adapter circuitry. Some of the whiny fucks who are bitching about this will shit themselves and wail and say "well Apple should have put an HDMI port on the phone". Really? Why? I have an HTC Evo, it has a micro USB port and a mini HDMI port for connecting to an external monitor. In the two years I've had this phone I've used that adapter exactly zero fucking times. Are there any other useless ports that you twats would like to see on the new iPhone 5? How about an RS-232 serial port, oh, and a Centronics parallel port in case I want to connect the phone to my old HP LaserWriter, and a pair of PS/2 ports would be nice too, you can never tell when you'll want to plug in an old Logitech keyboard and mouse.
There is, in case you didn't know, a thing called "market research". It's where you go out and try to figure out what people will want to buy so you can make stuff that they'll want to buy. Apple did some market research and said "hey, you know what, most people don't connect their phones to their TV sets and don't really want to, so let's do something other than put a useless mini HDMI connector on our phones. Apple is really good at this and always has been. In the 1970s Jobs and Wozniak said "Hey, we think people would like to buy an affordable computer that's easily programmable and expandable" and the Apple I was born. Which every other manufacturer then proceeded to copy with varying degrees of success. Then in the 1980s Apple looked at the Xerox Star and said "Hey, we think that people would like to buy a computer that's easier to use". They made a few fumbles along the way (the Lisa, the original 128k Mac) but eventually got it right with the Ma
cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
so drunk people like me can plug the damn thing in however we want, in the dark, without fiddling with it. just plug it in and go.
you people are babies. no one's forcing you to buy an iphone, so kindly stfu and go play with your buggy droid