Slashdot Mirror


User: BlowCat

BlowCat's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
564
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 564

  1. Re:It could be worse... on Microsoft Instant Messenger Virus Sweeps Net · · Score: 2

    What are you taking about?
    goatse.cx is down since February 2 or so :-(
    Haven't you noticed?

  2. Re:i proclaim... on Slashback: Playstation, CueCat, Games · · Score: 1

    How comes that inane drivel is +5 Funny, but a link to a real embedded webserver (albeit not CueCat) is -1 Offtopic?

  3. Re:what's the point of this? on Linux on the iMac G4 · · Score: 2
    Perhaps there would be even more open source stuff for OS X if people weren't bustling around trying to install Linux on their designer Macs.
    But if people can dual-boot, maybe there will be more portable software.
  4. Re:Now for the entropy pool. on Preemptible Kernel Patch Accepted · · Score: 2
    god I hate it when people talk about something and then don't give any link

    god I hate when people talk about something in the server room and I cannot decrypt it. Should have used high bits.

  5. Re:Tradeoffs? on Preemptible Kernel Patch Accepted · · Score: 3, Insightful
    In fact, you just demonstrated that the processor does more work with the preemptible kernel. Perhaps you were assuming that all 100% of CPU time is utilized and that faster GUI is not really useful, so the processor does less "useful work".

    This is not true in case of workstations, whose primary purpose is to provide smooth and fast environment for people to work, not to crunch numbers.

    Neither does your assumption hold for embedded systems - their function is often to provide fast responce to external signals, which they can do much better now. Most embedded systems don't utilize 100% of the processor power either.

    It is only in the case of servers with heavy I/O that your reasoning makes sence. But the solution is in the hardware - use bigger blocks of data, and the processor won't be interrupted too much.

  6. Re:Email harvesters: an answer? on Tracking Spam to the Source · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I have installed it on my site.

  7. Re:maybe if we stop answering it... on Tracking Spam to the Source · · Score: 2
    But what if you still want to receive e-mail from your grandfather who uses Windows XP (which doesn't support the new protocol) and doesn't want to upgrade because he has been using it for years?

    I can hardly imagine phasing out SMTP any time soon despite all its problems.

    Another question. Would you want to block an e-mail operator in China that only charges 1 cent? What if you have friends in China? Or the United States should break all ties to all counties that charge less, even though the average salary in those countries is 100 times less than in the US?

  8. Re:maybe if we stop answering it... on Tracking Spam to the Source · · Score: 2

    The mailing list for linux-wlan users generates most false positives for me. People discuss drivers for Linux, but still use e-mail software form Microsoft.

  9. Re:Non-Volatile Memory on When PC Still Means 'Punch Card' · · Score: 1
    Nasca Lines

    http://www.crystalinks.com/nasca.html

    Not exactly current data format, but suitable for messages to other civilizations.

  10. Re:brilliant! on Run Your Firewall Halted for Extra Security · · Score: 1
    Be a metamoderator in the meantime. That post was redundant, but not offtopic. I usually consider most negative moderations unfair. Why don't moderators search for new interesting posts and instead spend their points moderating inane comments from 0 to -1?

    I post this from my account because I don't care about my karma. As soon as it reaches 0, I'll switch to kuro5shin.org.

  11. Re:oddly.. on Vermont Goes Opt-In, Corps Unhappy · · Score: 2

    Paid spamcop.net filtering service is an option. People will be asked to confirm that they want to contact you by clicking on a link. Sounds like a reasonable requirement for those conserned about security. Also here's your chance to customize the standard "click request" to remind users to provide some information (e.g. version of the software in question).

  12. Re:Or, vice-versa... on A Look Inside the BSA · · Score: 2
    Points 1 and 2 are fine.

    3: The damage is indirect, but it can be proven given enough well-paid lawyers - if you make a copy without my permission, I could argue that if you didn't have that opportunity, you would buy another copy from me, rather than e.g. use free software.

    4: If there are N and more potential users who want to pay for 1/Nth cost of the development, it may be impractical for them to cooperate if N is 100 and more. Even in case of two companies they may have reasons not to cooperate, yet the software they need may be too expensive if only one company pays for its development.

  13. Re:Gosh, that looks so bad! on A Look Inside the BSA · · Score: 2
    The difference is that in case of GPL, I can buy warranty from a third party. In fact, my previous employer did just that and paid tens of thousands of dollars to a well known Linux company. The liability was not limited to $5 or the cost of the software.

    I doubt that anybody without complete source of Microsoft products and the right to produce fixed versions of it would sell you warranty for Microsoft's products.

  14. Re:Still implausible on Followup To Bohr-Heisenberg Meeting · · Score: 2

    Also note that Hanford is misspelled as Hartford in both posts!

  15. Re:Miguel's vision is better than RMS's on RMS Asks Miguel to Explain Himself · · Score: 2
    The key word is "C compiler", not just "compiler". It's hard to write a portable program in C (that the reason of Autoconf's existance), yet it's almost impossible to write software in C that will compile out-of-box on a future OS. Take any source from 1992 and try compiling it on a modern OS of your choice.

    Whether C# is going to change this situation is debatable, but unlike C it's designed to be a language for one platform, not for many platforms, so this issue should be addressed as long as the backward compatibility of the virtual machine is preserved.

  16. Re:Why must Miguel explain himself to RMS? on RMS Asks Miguel to Explain Himself · · Score: 1

    If you want to contribute, use bugzilla.ximian.com and submit bugs in the existing software.

  17. Re:mod this -1, unfunny on mozilla.org Releases Mozilla 0.9.8 · · Score: 2
    It was a .01 upgrade, but making it required hundreds hours of qualified manpower, much more than some cheap utilities found in abundance on Freshmeat get during their whole development cycle.

    Besides, Mozilla was critisized for looking "foreign" on Macs. Now it's fixed. The only problem is that it's hard to support native (actually pseudo-native) widgets on every OS. I would personally prefer Mozilla developers not to spend too much time on eye-candy, but I respect their job.

  18. Native widgets on mozilla.org Releases Mozilla 0.9.8 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    I hope that Mozilla 1.0 will have native widget support for Windows 2005.

    Just kidding. Good job, guys!

  19. Re:ok once and for all..... on Leonard Kleinrock On The Origins of Packet Switching · · Score: 2
    blog = bloated log. You can find them sometimes in restrooms.

    Seriously, it's typical for English to remove significant parts of words provided that the pronounciation doesn't change much. Also it's typical not to consider whether the new word is similar to already existing words. English speakers are very simple-minded in this regard.

    If somebody, say, in Poland came to the market with a product called "Hot Dogs" (in Polish), they would go out of business immediately. And nobody would give a respectable site a name so closely reminding "bloated log".

  20. Re:Risks of Centralised Control on Bazaars in the Government Cathedral · · Score: 2

    No, cameras can alert the pilots and the ground about suspicious activity of the passengers. Fighter jets can be scrambled earlier, evacuation of buildings can start earlier and non-overridable autopilot can be activated from the ground if really necessary.

  21. Re:Kernel development on Kernel 2.5.3 Released · · Score: 2
    It's made by GNU/zealots.
    Wrong. Linux kernel is written by professional programmers. Have you ever talked to anybody mentioned in the kernel changelog?
  22. Re:White hat v. Black hat on The SEC and Fake Investment Sites · · Score: 3, Insightful
    In fact, the site is rather dumb. It "traps" me too early. Just because I clicked on some links, it don't mean that I "could get scammed". Why cannot I click all links before I use other sources to check if the company is real?

    Only if I entered some personal information on the site and tried to submit it, then I'm likely to be a potential victim. But not before that.

  23. Magic word: disclaimer on 3.5 Ton Satellite to Crash Back to Earth · · Score: 5, Funny
    This satellite is provided by its designers "as is" and any expressed or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed.

    In no event shall the designers of the satellite be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, exemplary, or consequential damages (including, but not limited to, procurement of substitute goods or services; loss of use, data, or profits; or business interruption; destruction of cities, countries, continents; death of all humans) however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in contract, strict liability, or tort (including negligence or otherwise) arising in any way out of the use of this satellite, even if advised of the possibility of such damage.

  24. Re:Yamhill on Intel's Answer to AMD's Hammer - Yamhill · · Score: 1
    Little red star? You mean they are communists?
    They are dot-commies.
  25. Re:*sigh* Same old line. (No .. look at Apache) on AOL Time Warner Files Anti-Trust Suit against MS · · Score: 2

    People setting up web servers are more likely to consider alternatives that people doing the first steps on the internet.