Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Playstation, CueCat, Games

This edition of Slashback has updates and clarifications on the official release of Sony's PS2 Linux, relative security among various operating systems, dirty output on power-boosted Linksys wireless access points, and more, flying hardware you might have figured was no more, and more.

Maybe a bad day at the factory? An anonymous reader submits: "I'm not sure where the other fellow got his WAP11, but mine don't show the dirty output his does." See this diagram for a much more desireable outcome, if you care to play with (a little bit of) fire.

First application should be a GPL'd AIBO obedience school. gonz writes: "An update to the previous reported linux on ps2 kit has been submitted by Sony Computer Entertainment Europe (SCEE) to the people previously registering interest on their technology sites. The update consist of that it will be released in May on both SCEA (us) and SCEE (pal areas, including Europe and Australia) territories. A website has been set up at this place. On a side note, registering for notification when pre-ordering can apparently be done too: 'Finally, although sales haven't yet started, if you send an e-mail with the message "subscribe" to ps2linux-request@technology.scee.net we'll let you know when pre-ordering starts.'"

Lessons in obviousness. John Kozubik writes: "I have written an article describing, in a manner I have not yet seen, why the court decision by the U.S. appeals court in SF that claimed in-line linking was not fair use was inherently flawed. It is a short piece written for both the technical and the non-technical, and I think it raises a strong point concerning the arbitrary nature of browser behavior."

If they'd launch some pigs, perhaps global phones would be affordable. Guppy06 writes: "Many of you may be surprised to learn that Iridium (famous for trying to compete with cell phones and failing miserably) is still throwing up satellites (I sure was). The article on CNN tells of the technical woes of getting this particular Delta II off the pad in Vandenberg as Iridium tries to put five more spares into orbit."

Couldn't they have spayed or neutered them instead? Speaking of old hardware, Anonymous Radio Shack Employee writes: "RadioShack has sent a notice to all of its employees to destroy all CueCats (preferably with a hammer). Apparently the CueCat is among a couple of dozen items that RadioShack has given up on, and wants destroyed. The memo says that store employee's can not benefit from the items on the list. Which sucks because my store has over a hundred of these things just sitting in the back room." This week's Linux Weekly News has a great, detailed followup to the recent flap over relative OS security sparked by a post in Windows Informant.

302 comments

  1. Re:sombrero? by real_b0fh · · Score: 0

    excellent work... damn you I was writing a stupid journal entry and missed this... hahaha

    --
    "Contrary to popular belief, UNIX is user friendly. It just happens to be selective on who it makes friendship with"
  2. Your own personal CueCat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What does breaking the CueCats have to do with anything? Can't they find some other use for them? There's got to be at least another way to get rid of them besides hitting them with a hammer...

    1. Re:Your own personal CueCat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll post this as AC because no self respecting slashdotter would ever admit to working at RadioShack.

      Whenever an item is written off at RadioShack...say for example, you give replace someone's radio under a service plan...you are supposed to destroy the item. This is done for a couple reasons that I can think of. As an employee, you could take the item, send it to get serviced on the store's tab (Radioshack...We Service What We Sell), resell it, and the void / backout the transaction and pocket the cash while avoiding discrepencies in the inventory. Also, prevents you from other such mischief... sending it to get repaired, and keeping it for yourself.

      Since they're being written off, the procedure is therefore the procedure of all written off goods -- destruction by the almighty hammer.

      I still can't see how people would profit off them, except maybe selling them as some sort of bizarre techno-geek sex toy / butt plug. I think if you use it to scan your butt, it automatically brings up a link to goatse.

    2. Re:Your own personal CueCat by atari2600 · · Score: 0, Troll

      "I'll post this as AC because no self respecting slashdotter would ever admit to working at RadioShack" BS

    3. Re:Your own personal CueCat by seann · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I work at the Canadian Radioshack, and we have very differnt practices (We are a differnt company, owned by Intertan).

      There are vender repair codes, eg:
      R
      D
      V
      Repair, Destroy, Vender Return
      And depending on the item, we would do the corresponding action.
      Eg: I took back a pair of headphones today that was just below the 3 month warrenty, we didn't destroy them, I gave the customer a new pair, and then purolated the 21$ headphones to the vender to be repair, and redistributed.

      This makes *far* more sense than what you have described your Radioshack does.

      Keen.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    4. Re:Your own personal CueCat by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

      This makes *far* more sense than what you have described your Radioshack does.
      Two words.. Labor costs. A portable CD player that sells for $50 costs less than that to manufacture. If the laser or spindle motor or such goes out, you have at least an hour troubleshooting, ordering parts, looking up part numbers, keeping inventory of unique parts, replacing the part, aligning and warrenting the repair. You break even with techs at $20 per hour how?? Short answer.. replace it. Very little sold in radio shack sells for over a $100.00. I used to fix VCR's when they were a 600 to 1200 dollar item. Now that they are a 60 dollar item, I found other work.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:Your own personal CueCat by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2

      There used to be a project on SourceForge to allow the cue:cat to be used as a regular scanner in Linux.

      Since Radio Shack was just giving the things away they shouldn't complain if the store employees wanted to take a few dozen to their local Linux Users Group and pass them out.

    6. Re:Your own personal CueCat by XO · · Score: 1

      I had a guy ask to buy 100 of them off me. They're great little devices, if you can come up with a use for them. Honestly, although they are written off, they are still sitting in the backroom waiting for the hammer. I am NOT spending MY time breaking 358 of the damn things when I've got far better things to do. :-)

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    7. Re:Your own personal CueCat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't forget the biggest reason of all.

      They write it off, but don't destroy it....then you are in violation of the law..

      IRS and all. Its called Tax fraud. "

      How the hell is that a troll? What a dunce of a moderator. IT IS TRUE.

    8. Re:Your own personal CueCat by seann · · Score: 1

      Nobody services them at the store, they ship them back to the original manufacturer.

      End of story, no hassle.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  3. Speaking of flawed links.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    fair use was HREF="http://www.kozubik.com/published/decisions.t xt">http://www.kozubik.com/published/decisions. txt">inherently flawed.
    oh, the irony.
  4. cuecat by IanA · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why not just give them away, or throw away?

    *destroy* seems like overkill, explain please

    1. Re:cuecat by spt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They probably don't want to have to support the customers that would get one - "my cue:cat doesn't understand the barcode on my baked beans .. whine whine whine"

      They may well want to sever their relationship with the digital:convergence to, and smashing the things to bits is a great way to send that message.

    2. Re:cuecat by pythas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The last non tech job I had was working in a warehouse for a retailer. We got orders popping out from time to time that instructed us to destroy items. Probably not an uncommon thing.

      Maybe it's for some kind of wacky accounting purposes??? I don't know.

    3. Re:cuecat by gleam_mn · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to work for a University electronics shop and we would often have to destroy equipment for two reasons:

      1) The university didn't want people dumpster diving

      2) Any equipment that was donated to the university from companies like Fluke had to be destroyed prior to disposal because the agreement with Fluke stated that you weren't allowed to make a profit from donated equipment... so, no salvage (because the U still makes a profit from salvage auctions) which is how most U items go out. Also, I think to adhere to the strict letter of the agreement they didn't want that equipment getting out into peoples hands via point 1)

      Not sure what the exact agreement was with the makers of the CueCat but I imagine it may well boil down to "if we don't profit from 'em, nobody should! damnit!"

      --
      - The auditors said to secure the server... hand me that duct-tape -
    4. Re:cuecat by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I worked a consulting job that sent me to a big toy company's offices in NYC. We once spent the day destroying a room full of toy centipedes, hammer to plastic. They just didn't want them resold through unofficial outlets. Evidently the government holds them responsible for them even if they get thrown out. Ie. if someone chokes on a piece of a toy they picked out the garbage, they are can still be sued. Destroying them saves them that liability.

      By and by a fun gig, they had an unlimited IT budget, so they had things like $12,000 plasma video screens thoughtout the office, and IBM Intellistations as office computers.

      The coolest thing was building Half Pipe, full size, to do a presentation on the X-games toys.

    5. Re:cuecat by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      At the retailer I work for, we are often instructed to do the same thing to software (i.e. Red Hat Linux, Mandrake Linux, Peachtree Accounting, Quickbooks, etc). Sometimes, manufacturers instruct us to send the items back to them, but that's getting rare.

      Employees aren't even allowed to take them home or have the items donated. I've asked. If we want them, we have to pay FULL retail for them.

      Supposedly, the manufacturer reimburses the company the full cost of the items once they're destroyed.

      I've discovered that once a "destroy order" has been issued, that item usually gets marked down to .01 cent later on. And if the company accidentally sells that item for .01 cent, the company must (so I've been told) pay the manufacturer the original full retail for it.

    6. Re:cuecat by clump · · Score: 2
      Supposedly, the manufacturer reimburses the company the full cost of the items once they're destroyed.
      Ah, I will bet that publishers are afraid that if leftovers aren't destroyed, the publisher would have no way of knowing if the item was paid for later on. Thats significant because I am sure companies don't want to guarantee/support something that they didn't get any revenue for.

      Also, I think giving away leftovers could be thought of encouraging unpopularity. IE, hide an item so nobody can buy it. I know that happens at places like Target because Target gives employees breaks on leftovers.

      I could be wrong, but what your saying would seem logical.
    7. Re:cuecat by sigwinch · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Evidently the government holds them responsible for them even if they get thrown out. Ie. if someone chokes on a piece of a toy they picked out the garbage, they are can still be sued.
      No, there is no warranty for garbage. The real issue is that the toy had probably already been sold in stores. How do you distinguish a toy with a warranty from a toy picked out of the garbage? It's very hard, and the attempt might cause bad publicity. Destroying the toys protects against confusion, which can easily cost more than simple liability.
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    8. Re:cuecat by BlueJay465 · · Score: 2
      I know this is the case with paperback books. For instance it is not uncommon to run across one in a second hand store like the Salvation Army or the local Goodwill store that under the front cover is a page that states something to the effect of:

      If you have purchased this book with the cover removed, the book has been reported as unsold to the publisher and neither the publisher or author of the book has received payment for this book.

      AFAIK, this may be implying that by possessing such a book, you may be in violation of copyright law, but I do not know for sure.
    9. Re:cuecat by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      why destroy? to make it a tax write off. and the memo is just part of that paper trail.

    10. Re:cuecat by a+random+streaker · · Score: 0

      Now your corporation has to worry about people choking on the broken pieces fished out of the garbage. Talk about going from the frying pan into the fire.

      --
      "All representatives are busy. The estimated hold time is one..hundred..sixty..four..minutes." Detroit Edison, 02/01/02
    11. Re:cuecat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, why not give them away? Someone might find it useful. There's got to be a way Radio Shack can give them away to geeks with the warning that whatever the recipients do with the cats is entirely up to them. I got one a while back and now currently use it to test some scanning software that I have written. Sure, the message the CueCat is sending is encoded, but I can use it for testing the scanner timing on the PS/2 port. It just gives me something else to test my software against to make sure that the correct information is getting syphened off the port. Extra testing == better software.

    12. Re:cuecat by ender- · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, this may be implying that by possessing such a book, you may be in violation of copyright law, but I do not know for sure

      I don't think it's a matter of violating copyright law. If the book has no cover, it was stolen.

      I used to work at Waldenbooks and instead of sending unsold paperbacks to the publisher, we were told to tear off the cover, and destroy the rest of the book. Only the cover was sent to the publisher. I spent many an hour tearing paperback's in half [along the spine, I'm not THAT strong! :) ]

      As a very avid reader this always pissed me off, as I'm sure there are thousands of libraries or schools that would LOVE to have some books donated. At the very least the paper could be recycled, but the publishers won't even allow that.

      Ender

    13. Re:cuecat by BlueJay465 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's a matter of violating copyright law. If the book has no cover, it was stolen.

      It has been a long time since I have seen one, but now that you mention it, this is in fact the case.

  5. No comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take the 5th so as not to incriminate myself.

    1. Re:No comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but doesn't that inherently incriminate you?

  6. i proclaim... by doooras · · Score: 5, Funny

    i will have the first webserver running on a cue cat.

    1. Re:i proclaim... by NachtVorst · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It has already been done... Check out this hand-powered web server

    2. Re:i proclaim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um... that looks more like a bigass flashlight than a cue cat, bro

    3. Re:i proclaim... by BlowCat · · Score: 1

      How comes that inane drivel is +5 Funny, but a link to a real embedded webserver (albeit not CueCat) is -1 Offtopic?

    4. Re:i proclaim... by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because a joke (if you find it funny or not) about a CueCat is ontopic when one of the topics is CueCat, but a post about a real embedded webserver is not ontopic, when there is no webserver mentioned.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  7. Just think of the entertainment. by Inspired+Chaos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Alright! I'm deffinately ready for the "101 ways to destroy a Cuecat" video craze. :)

    1. Re:Just think of the entertainment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      deffinately is deffinately not spelled deffinately.

    2. Re:Just think of the entertainment. by extra88 · · Score: 4, Funny

      FYI, bonsaicuecat.com is still up for grabs.

    3. Re:Just think of the entertainment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask and you shall recieve...

      http://metathink.com/killcat/mg.shtml

    4. Re:Just think of the entertainment. by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a site dedicated to trimming a Cue Cat for meditational purposes.

      Perhaps you meant kamikazecuecat.com?

      ;o)

  8. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead mod me down. I just couldn't resist

  9. Cuecats being destroyed . . . by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 5, Funny
    . . . can only mean that they will become more scarce. Then, decades from now, when I'm old and grey, I'll retire on the income from selling the ones I collected from every Radio Shack in the four state area when Digital Convergence broke out the jackboots.

    I dance a jig on their grave. See where empty-headed threats and intellectual property rhetoric lead?

    --

    Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    1. Re:Cuecats being destroyed . . . by UncleRoger · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ah, see, and people laughed at the CueCat Collectors Club! Buwahahahaaaaa!

      --
      Stupid people will be persecuted to the fullest extent allowed by law.
    2. Re:Cuecats being destroyed . . . by Zarnoff · · Score: 1

      Looks like more than one RS employee is trying to dump them on eBay. Wow, a 12-pack for only $3! Get 'em while they are still almost free.

    3. Re:Cuecats being destroyed . . . by base3 · · Score: 1

      You might be able to pick up some here for a while after Radio Shack hammers theirs. A tasteful selection is available in prices ranging from $7.95 to $89.95 for your privacy dilution needs.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  10. Great by Tadrith · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somebody call the humane society!

    Oh... they're not *real*?

  11. Irridium is still sending stuff up? why? by CounterZer0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or better yet, how? Where did all the cash for those birds come from? Was it a pre-payed deal? Did the NSA decide they REALLY wanted them up there, or are they part of our new Missle Defense prog? (J/k!)

  12. Sigh... by Will_Malverson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs! Don't forget the http://!

    1. Re:Sigh... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I though he did that because of the linkung issue.
      I guess I forgot the old adage "never chock up to lame humor, anything that can be attributeed to stupidity"

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  13. Crush videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I got arrested and charged with cruelty to animals for stomping on mice.

    How does Radio Shack expect to get away with crushing CueCats with hammers?

    This is just another example of Big Corporate Government making their own laws, squashing the little guys.

  14. CueCat Accessories? by VertigoAce · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why did RadioShack continue supporting CueCats for so long? I was there fairly recently and saw that they were selling things like CueCat holders for your desk... I don't know about other places, but Dallas stopped putting CueCat barcodes in the newspaper quite a while ago.

    1. Re:CueCat Accessories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had CueCat barcodes in your newspaper? :)

      They didn't in Miami...

  15. Radio Shack Addendum by UsonianAutomatic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cue::Cats are only to be destroyed with the special Cue::Hammer.

    The Cue::Hammer, when connected to your computer's serial port, will digitally scan any object it is used upon and automatically take you to a website featuring...

    oh, never mind.

  16. Radio Scrap by Hydro-X · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow! Something from Radio Scrap that actually needs help in falling apart! :]

    1. Re:Radio Scrap by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

      Actually, anything that is to be thrown out at a Radio Shack store MUST be smashed to bits before putting in the dumpster.. It's their lame policy.

    2. Re:Radio Scrap by gleam_mn · · Score: 1

      It's their lame policy.

      Seems lame until you consider that if they didn't break stuff first then all kinds of geeks would be dumpster diving and when some jackass broke his neck climbing out of a dumpster they'd get sued... and knowing how things are today, they'd end up paying out serious $$$$... easier to break stuff and remove the temptation.

      --
      - The auditors said to secure the server... hand me that duct-tape -
    3. Re:Radio Scrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      My first dumpster diving experiences were at Radio Shack.

      It was great pickins, usually stuff that had soda or something spilled in it that could be easily cleaned out. Nothing was ever smashed, unless it had been obviously dropped or something.

      I was the first kid on my block with the latest gadgets, and never had to pay a cent for them. Mini tv sets, A cd player when the only cds out there were Michael Jackson's Thriller and some bad classical, and tons of other cool stuff.

      Of course, the downside was that my parents alternated between thinking I was shoplifting to thinking I was selling drugs to afford all this stuff.

    4. Re:Radio Scrap by sjames · · Score: 2

      when some jackass broke his neck climbing out of a dumpster they'd get sued

      They could just place the stuff out back on the ground. They could give it one of several charities that fix up old items and sell them.

      Destroying things rather than giving them to others who can't afford them (and want them even if they're broken) is exactly the behavious of a spoiled rotten aristicracy. The sort of aristicracy that is beheaded when the revolution comes.

      The above is especially true in the case of a necessity like food, but applies to a degree for other things as well. The behaviour is every bit as anti social as mindless vandalism but is less excusable since it is a matter of policy made by 'responsable adults' rather than the spontaneous act of kids with nothing better to do. In the case of food or other necessity, the act becomes even worse.

      To add insult to injury, when an employee tries to do the right thing (the moral and ethical thing), the corperates call it stealing.

    5. Re:Radio Scrap by McSpew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hey, the policy's not lame. It's a blast. I once replaced a VCR that was deemed "uneconomical to repair." We pitched the dead one off the roof of the building my store was in. It was a hoot.

      And trust me, after you've just finished dealing with an infuriating customer who took all the anger of his entire life out on you, taking his returned, worthless answering machine out behind the store and beating the crap out of it with something big and heavy is a very satisfying release.

  17. ::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having to post this anonymously (as a Former Radio Shack Employee Who Does Not Wish To Cause Trouble Even Though His Boss Has No Idea What Slashdot Is) - I was working for RS when the memo came out that all Cats were to be given away IMMEDAITELY. Our boss made us push them on every customer, showing us the memo that said that each store would be charged $0.05 for each Cat remaining in the store past X date. I don't know who submitted the article, but perhaps his boss doesn't read his memos. Anyway, we dumped our stock shortly thereafter in a matter of a few days. Also, the bit about "employees not benefitting from these items" or whatever is somewhat bogus - it's not like RS corporate makes you send them pictures of numbered piles of destroyed Cats. If his/her boss has half a heart he'd let his employees take home whatever.

    1. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we couldn't toss them in the dumpster because my boss was trying to be fair to his company. Every time we 'gave' one to a customer it was added to their order, which usually has a name and address, etc. If our stock suddenly decreased to 0 while our system said that we had 100, someone would be suspicious. If we just added them on to customer's tickets without actually giving it to them, they'd want to know what it was we were listing for $0.00.

      The only reason I post this anonymously is because all the RS fax reports tend to say something about 'CONFIDENTIAL COMPANY USE ONLY' so I'm just doing a standard CYA.

      In response to your other question - I can't remember if I used my real name or not when I signed up. I know if I didn't I used an alias that all my co-workers know.

    2. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The employees not benefitting part is very believeable. Retail stores of every kind dump old product, and if you happen to take it home instead of throwing it away, you are stealing from the company apparently. Even if you're lucky enough to work for almighty 7-11, you can't just give the $300.00 or so in nowhere near spoiled food that the company writes off everyday to the homeless shelter across the street. No, that would be stealing. When you work for a bookstore, you'd think that all unsold paperback books were recycled. No, just thrown away. What? our schools need books? No, that would be stealing. God I wish I were kidding.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    3. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by kaphka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unsold books and food are both special cases.

      As for the food, it's spoiled; safe or not, I'm sure that no business wants to expose itself to the lawsuit that might ensue if someone got sick after eating their abandoned food.

      The books are an intellectual property issue. I'm sure every Slashdot readers knows about the difference between buying a copy and licensing a work. When a bookstore destroys a book, they get a refund from the publisher, because although the paper was wasted, the content (which is much more valuable) can be sold again somewhere else. If they simply gave away the books, someone would have to pay royalties to the author and everyone else involved. A little hard to swallow, perhaps, but it makes sense.

      Of course, none of this applies to the CueCat, as far as I can tell.

      --

      MSK

    4. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that why paperbacks have their cover torn off, then dumped out? Most paperbacks have the disclaimer of "if this book is missing it's cover bla bla bla this book should not be resold you sinner bla bla"? Or did have they stopped doing that as of late?

    5. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Exactly; thus the little blurbs you often see in paperbacks that say something like "If you purchased this book without a cover, it is stolen property. It was reported to the publisher as destroyed and neither the publisher nor the author has received any payment for this copy of the book." Apparently, in the book trade, tearing the cover off a book and throwing it in the dumpster counts as destroyed.

    6. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by MathJMendl · · Score: 2
      You were working for r.s.
      Maybe I'm missing something, but what does working for Richard Stallman have to do with this, and why would Richard Stallman work at Radio Shack?
      --


      "I have not failed. I've simply found 10,000 ways that won't work." --Thomas Edison
    7. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by Mordanthanus · · Score: 1

      You know, it is a sad day when all of the collective conscience of the country is controlled by the thought of being sued for every goddamned thing that may or may not happen.

      [OffTopic][Rant] Why is it that this country (US) produces more lawyers than anything else?? I'll tell you why. Because people in this country are becoming pansies and don't want to take responsibility for their own actions. Why not give the cuecats to all us hardware hackers out there?? Because someone might choke on it?? First of all, if you choke on a cuecat, you deserved to die for being so damned stupid for putting it in your mouth. Someone might get the thing hung up somewhere where it doesn't belong?? I think the humility of going to the hospital over that one was instilled very well from all the gerbils that died from that horrible fate.

      When is everyone going to get back to taking responsibility for themselves without blaming all their problems on someone else and then trying to get rich from it?[/OffTopic][/Rant]

      Sorry, had to get that off of my chest.

      --
      User logging on... 300 baud... 300 BAUD?!? (Click!) NO CARRIER
    8. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by qqtortqq · · Score: 1

      No, they still do it, with magazines as well. The covers are sent back to the manufacturer as proof the book/magazine was destroyed due to the book not selling or magazine going out of date, then the store gets a credit for the unsold stuff.

      When I worked for blockbuster, I'd always take home the coverless magazines after we were supposed to destroy them. Everyone did, and no one told us not to.

    9. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, we used to go dumpster diving at the local convenience store once a month when they threw out the playboys without covers. I don't know how we first discovered it, but it was like clockwork, same day of the month, there they would be - a pile of magainzes without covers full of gorgeous women uncovered. It was an odd, but appropriate symmetry.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by morgus+morphus · · Score: 1

      In sensible countries, like the Netherlands, a lot of supermarkets will put their perishables out on the street behind the shop so the homeless can come and take them. On purpose.

      Of course that's a sensible country where if you tried to sue the supermarket because you took food they left for you to take and you got a stomach upset, you'd get laughed out of court but hey ;)

    11. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by Lord+Hugh+Toppingham · · Score: 1
      Its true, the Netherlands is enlightened. However outside every Albert Heijn you will find several drug-crazed people to hassle you for money. I wonder if this is connected to the free food ?

      Its true the Netherlands is a pragmatic country, but one wonders how long this character can survive now they have joined the E.U.

      My guess is that the EU will force the Netherlands to close down its 'coffee shops', and tone down its 'sex industry' because it offends the puritanical elements.

    12. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by Ken+Hall · · Score: 1

      I guess this explains why they gave me one about 2 weeks ago, along with a cord that's supposed to go between your TV and PC sound card. Maybe I should keep them both sealed as collectors' items.

    13. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Well they've been in the EU a while without that happening _ the Netherlands were one of the founder members of the original EEC.

      More likely that the more liberal European attitudes of Holland, Germany, Denmark etc will have to be adopted in Britain - easily the most puritanical EU country.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    14. Re:::Cue::Cat (or however you spell it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My guess is that the EU will force the Netherlands to close down its 'coffee shops', and tone down its 'sex industry' because it offends the puritanical elements."

      Hey, just hope the Christians don't get their hands into the EU like they do the US'

  18. Radio Shack by SpacePunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, I won't be using Radio Shack ever again. I don't see any reason to patronize a business that would rather destroy an item it no longer wants or can sell, especially something they were just handing out for free in the first place... rather than give the items away to those who need/want them. It's a waste of resources that could have been better used instead of destroyed. It's this sort of action that defines what the deepest, darkest depths that greed and ignorance can reach.

    1. Re:Radio Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cisco dumped hundreds of millions worth of unsold stock into a landfill. You can only write off the loss if it is truly a loss. Happens quite often, and yes, its wasteful as hell.

    2. Re:Radio Shack by vsync64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I work at Office Depot, and we do the same thing. Anything a customer comes back with saying "it's broken" gets put in the D&D pile, which is later smashed, shredded and hit with red spray paint. We generally don't check if it is broken, either. Yes, it sucks, but what to do? Our entire economic system is based on enforcing artificial scarcity.

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    3. Re:Radio Shack by Restil · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      They're pretty worthless anyways. If I need an LED or a common resistor, I can usually go the ratshack route for what I need. But any electronic components more diverse than that, you might as well forget about it.

      I went in search of a 600:600 transformer the other day. No luck. I know WHERE I can get them, but rat shack is much closer. So I figured that's where I'd hunt.

      No dice.

      Pity.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    4. Re:Radio Shack by Yorrike · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Nothing compared to the lengths banks go to.

      There's a bank I worked for a little while ago which recieved 40 17" monitors that it had since decided it didn't want.

      Since the supplier wouldn't take them back and the bank had a stupid "destroy all obsolete computer equipment" policy, the brand, spanking new monitors, still in their unopened boxes, where taken to the landfill where a large hole was dug, the monitors dumped into and run over with a bulldozer.

      In the words of one of my university going friends: "The university computer department would have killed for those"

      I would have taken those monitors off their hands, for free. A 40 monitor wall display would have been cool.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    5. Re:Radio Shack by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ther are actually accounting and inventory reason for doing this.
      Its the same with book stores. If they have a title they don't want/need. They rip off the front cover to send back, then toss the rest of the book. Every major boodstore will fire you if you try to take home the book, even without the cover.
      Basically, its cheaper to do this.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Radio Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try an old modem.

    7. Re:Radio Shack by TrickyRick · · Score: 1


      What about this. 1:1 transformer.

      Cat.#: 273-1374

    8. Re:Radio Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supposedly the "rip off the front cover" is to save on the shipping costs for the publisher or whoever is paying to send it. Of course, around here the used bookstores are still full of books for sale that are mysteriously missing their front cover.

    9. Re:Radio Shack by neurovish · · Score: 1

      If that is your criterion for not buying from a business, then I guess you'll have to make everything you use from now on...everybody does this, in every industry. Broken/unwanted goods that can't be sent back to the supplier get trashed...same way that unused food gets trashed at restaurants. There is a reason for this lying somewhere in the manager/accounting stratum...either reimbursment from the bigger fish, tax writeoff, or some kind of 'items we throw away' section of a company's operating budget...find a business major to figure out what's up.

    10. Re:Radio Shack by DataPath · · Score: 1

      You're going to have a tough time as a consumer, then. Staples has a similar policy. They get notified that certain items are to be destroyed, and they are then destroyed. Right down to the furniture items and books.

      It happens. I don't understand it, either. But it happens.

      --
      Inconceivable!
    11. Re:Radio Shack by imac.usr · · Score: 3, Troll

      The mere posting of this story is a hate crime against computer geeks everywhere. You should be ashamed...

      --
      I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
    12. Re:Radio Shack by Yorrike · · Score: 3, Funny
      Not ashamed, more relieved that the truth is finally out there. It's a weight off my chest.

      Trust me, when I heard of this occurance, I shed a tear for those poor, defenseless CRTs, being dumped in an umarked, undignified grave when there where thousands who would have given them the love they needed.

      I often wake screaming with guilt (or it could be caffine induced insanity, same diff I suppose).

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    13. Re:Radio Shack by seann · · Score: 1

      You will be glad to hear, in this nation (Canadia) those monitors would of been donated to an organization like "Computers for Schools" (CFS) or so.

      They even get banks computers, with hard drives with sensitive data on them (You have to run a program that writes over the hard drive 3 times with 0).

      Those monitors would of been put to a good use, towards students, for no cost!

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    14. Re:Radio Shack by Squalish · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but people, have you seen these things? THEY ARE LITTLE PLASTIC "CATS" THAT USED TO READ MAGAZINE ADVERTISEMENTS!!! They have no other use. You cannot feed the hungry with them. They cannot be used by corporations. They cannot be USED anymore. They are a relic of the tech bubble, and one of the most useless ones at that. A homeless person is supposed to use these for what- For gods sake, man, their INTENDED use was to help out people who were too lazy to TYPE IN THE WEB ADDRESS OF THE COMPANY. A routers is still a very profitable device. Cuecats were obsolete the moment people realized that all they did was open the advertisers website. The comparisons to food, routers, or any valuable good are complete crap.

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
    15. Re:Radio Shack by nexthec · · Score: 1

      600:600 is a 600 volt isolating transformer, a 1:1 is a one volt isolating transformer, not mutch good to him, even if you have six hundered of them ;->

    16. Re:Radio Shack by decep · · Score: 1

      I agree that it is wasteful, but if companies never wasted perfectly good equipment, I would have never had a TI-82 for Calculus. All of the demo calculators that are received at stores are thrown away when the batteries go dead (the ones with the thick plastic screwed to the back of them). I heard one that one was thrown away and I pulled it out of the trash, took the back off of it, and put in new batteries. It does not affect the stores either; they do not pay for the demos.

    17. Re:Radio Shack by John+Miles · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think you may be missing some important aspects of transformer fundamentals. :)

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    18. Re:Radio Shack by t · · Score: 3, Informative
      You should report the incident to the EPA since it is illegal to dispose of monitors in that manner due to the amount of lead in the CRT. Here in cali I think you have to pay $15/crt to dispose of it. That should teach the bank.

      t.

    19. Re:Radio Shack by Scoria · · Score: 1

      I certainly understand your argument. However, they may require the space for the purpose of storing new inventory, hence the reason they're destroying the Cue::Cats. :)

      --
      Do you like German cars?
    20. Re:Radio Shack by timbong · · Score: 1

      Wow, if this will stop you from going back to radio shack ever again then you would probably love Fry's electronics... They just take returned all broken or returned merchandise, slap a sticker on it and stick it back on the shelf. Hey, at least they arent wasting anything...

    21. Re:Radio Shack by British · · Score: 3, Informative

      Blockbuster does the same thing too, and of course, when I was an employee, I got all sorts of neat free stuff, including a Virtual Boy in their little kiosk stand. Even got some free Star Trek:Voyager trading cards way back in '96.

      Magazines? they just rip the cover off. Still a perfectly readable magazine. Heck, I had about a gazillion amarays(the black vhs tape boxes they always used).

    22. Re:Radio Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unopened boxes? Lots of padding, right? How about you and your uni friends hike out to the landfill, armed with shovels, for a little monitor excavation? ;)

    23. Re:Radio Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess they're more than meets the eye.

    24. Re:Radio Shack by SgtXaos · · Score: 1

      Uh, how about 600 *ohm* audio isolation/coupler. 600 ohms on both sides to give you 1:1 transfer.
      for, say, interstage coupling between stages with different Vcc.

      Not the same as 1:1 power isolation transformer rated at 600v. Certainly not the same size. :-)

      Generally the ratio is independent of the rated voltage. I.e. you can have a 1:1 power transformer rated at any given voltage. Generally only power type transformers are spec'd in terms of input/output voltage, and the ratio is implied (240:120 volt is a 2:1 step down, but the voltage ratings are important and imply the ratio). Audio units are more appropriately spec'd in terms of impedance and are used for load matching.

      --
      -- Don't call me "Sir," I increase entropy for a living!
    25. Re:Radio Shack by toast0 · · Score: 2

      on the plus side, you can return something to fry's for no reason at all, and don't have to worry about it being sent back to the manufacturer

      it kinda sucks when you want to buy something and all the boxes are stickerfied though

    26. Re:Radio Shack by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Apparently this is common practice at many stores, in many industries. Oddly enough though, we never had much of a problem with this at the Papa Johns I used to work at. The freezer shelf life of the stuff was always much greater than the time it would go unused; dough sometimes got hard to work with, but we'd never have to throw away more than a few trays out of a hundred, and dough was by far the cheapest part of the thing anyway. Any mistakes were either used in someone else's order, eaten by the staff, or given to one of the bums outside.

      But it really is apalling that it is cheaper to destroy extremely valuable stuff, especially computer equipment, rather than give it away to some charity or other needy organiztion. Anyone have ideas on solving it that doesn't involve new legislation?

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    27. Re:Radio Shack by IronChef · · Score: 2


      I have always refered to these as the Stickers of Shame. Occasionally I have bought a shamed box from Fry's when there was no other option... and every time it was DOA. When will I learn?

      Now I live in Seattle, where there is no Fry's. I hate it and miss it at the same time.

    28. Re:Radio Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for a major bookstore, Barnes And Noble, and we were ENCOURAGED to take home the remainder books after the covers were ripped off and returned. As I understand it, the publishers didn't care at all.

    29. Re:Radio Shack by Lord+Hugh+Toppingham · · Score: 1
      Cisco dumped hundreds of millions worth of unsold stock into a landfill


      I don't believe this for one minute. The whole point of stocks is that if demand goes down, so does the price. Its more likely that Cisco would hang onto its stock even buying more back if the price was low.


      Anyway, dumping stock is against SEC regulations.

    30. Re:Radio Shack by nexusone · · Score: 1

      What bank do you work for?
      I think someone needs to complain about them being environmentally unfriendly and big fine placed on them for not recycling.

      We have a local company that recycles old computers and gives them to schools and the needy. They clean off the old data on the hard drive and reload the OS.

      --
      Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
    31. Re:Radio Shack by Yorrike · · Score: 2
      I don't work for them anymore, I was contracted to them.

      I'd prefer not to identify the bank, but I do not reside in the United States, so your environmental policies do not apply.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    32. Re:Radio Shack by nexthec · · Score: 1

      I was doing power homework at the time so...I guess that was the frame of mind I was in. And with the stuff I use, you definatly donot excede the voltages, because you might cause the shelacing to melt and arc. especialy with our cheap stuff.

  19. Re:sombrero? by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 0

    I think I'm done. 4 FPs today. I can't realistically hope to beat that.

    You guys are the greatest. Really.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  20. Stupid CueCats by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

    I could never get the thing to work right.
    It was almost impossible to get anything to scan.

    1. Re:Stupid CueCats by Technician · · Score: 2

      It's true they don't perform as well as a Symbol laser scanner. But hey what were you expecting for free?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  21. The ever-useful cuecat by jamesmartinluther · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I walked into Radio Shack a couple of months ago to pick up some thin wire for a project. Not to be found. Then I noticed the cuecats and those nice, looooooooong serial cable tails.

    I took a few home and SNIP!

    Guess I'll do something with the cuecat guts sooner or later.

    - James

    1. Re:The ever-useful cuecat by Saturn49 · · Score: 1

      I got one of the CueCats from ScrapShack. Took it home, cut the neccessary traces inside. Now it reads barcodes, plain and ordinary. Great, free barcode scanner. But it is still useless.

    2. Re:The ever-useful cuecat by Technician · · Score: 2

      If you use any MS software, print the CD key as a barcode. It makes the weekly rebuild go much quicker. ;-)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  22. Home-made barcodes? by LordNimon · · Score: 3

    Has anyone been able to get their Cue:Cat to scan something they've printed with a bar code font? My cat will scan every UPC bar code I've found, but if I try to make my own, it almost never works.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Home-made barcodes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use GNU Barcode:
      barcode -b 594389 -e UPC -o output.ps
      More stuff here:
      http://www.coprolite.com/article.php?sid=9

    2. Re:Home-made barcodes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't work well with inkjet printouts because they don't have very sharp edges. Barcodes from a laser printer work fine.

    3. Re:Home-made barcodes? by delta407 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've gotten my cats (the earlier PS/2 ones, at least) to read Codabar, Code 128, and UPC-As... pretty much everything I've told it to. Barcodes are the most "legible" when printed on a laser printer; I had to enlarge the codes a wee bit to play nicely on my Lexmark 5700.

      So, yes, these little annoying plastic things can read home-made barcodes.

    4. Re:Home-made barcodes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone explain to me why this dude is posting at 3 w/o moderation? I thought the limit was 2...?

    5. Re:Home-made barcodes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Underrated" doesn't show up as a listing. Usually. I've seen a "(Score 5: Underrated)" once or twice, though.

    6. Re:Home-made barcodes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rest my case that /. is fucked up. You replied to my post about article scores, right?

      Anyhoo, I didn't realize that, thanks.

    7. Re:Home-made barcodes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not posting at 3. Someone modded his +2 post as underrated, giving him +3.

    8. Re:Home-made barcodes? by vondo · · Score: 2

      Don't know about a barcode font, but I print barcodes with gnu-barcode and it reads those OK. (Of course not as good as a $250 Symbol reader, but not bad.)

      I use weather-proof Avery labels which are kind of slick (smooth), which probably helps for multiple reads.

    9. Re:Home-made barcodes? by jred · · Score: 1

      You may need to use special ink. I know one customer of ours has to use special ink to print checks so they can be scanned... The one customer we have that prints their own barcodes uses special bar code printers, so I don't know about the ink in them...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    10. Re:Home-made barcodes? by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2

      Barcodes don't require special ink like checks. Checks require special "magnetic ink" in order to be machine read.by machines that are probably as old as you are. Barcodes on the other hand are completely optical. Nothing special about the ink there.

    11. Re:Home-made barcodes? by Technician · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's a quick 3 of 9 primer...
      Most TTF fonts I have seen for barcodes support 3 of 9 encoding as it does not have any interleaving or require a checksum. It does require a start and stop code however. (usualy a *) As a font the spacebar will place on unreadable gap in the barcode. To print the code that represents a space to the reader, an alternate translation charactor must be typed. (in my font it's an exclimation point!) 3 of 9 barcodes support the following 0-9, A-Z (uppercase only), and hyphen, period, Dollar, slash, plus, percent, and space. (yes you can barcode /.) To get lowercase and other ASCII, you must use extended 3 of 9. The Cue Cat reader does not support extended 3 of 9 and will provide only the pairs used to represent the extended caracters. Extended characters are a pair of characters that represent another single character. As an example a lower case A is coded +A and prints as a. A plus in front of a number prints as a +. Eg. +125 prints +125. Armed with this information my John Henry would be preped for a barcode font as follows.
      *JOHN!HENRY*
      A search of HP's website will get you the full extended 3 of 9 information. Another tidbit.. If you hack the Cat, all 3 of 9 is output in lower case instead of uppercase by the Cue Cat.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    12. Re:Home-made barcodes? by Technician · · Score: 2

      It's true special magnetic ink is used on checks, however the other special ink used with barcodes is used for infared readers. Dye based inkjet ink is transparent to infared and can not be scanned by an IR reader. Carbon pigmented dye inkjet (or laser printer) can be read. The IR readers are used where a barcode is obscured by a black dye based overcoat. (it's transparant to IR) This is to prevent the barcode from being copied on a photocopier, or being read by a hacker and duplicated. This is used in some low security access controls & ID badges. The black stripe on the back of a ID badge or student card might be optical, not magnetic. As a good Cue Cat Hack, replace the LED with an IR LED from an old TV remote to use IR barcodes. (A modified Cue Cat might not read a propritory code on a ID badge. Use with your own code.)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    13. Re:Home-made barcodes? by sjames · · Score: 1

      I've gotten my cats (the earlier PS/2 ones, at least) to read Codabar, ...

      My cats can't seem to read anything at all, but they can detect the sound of a tuna can cracking from about a mile away every time.

    14. Re:Home-made barcodes? by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. It seems my inkjet printer was the problem. Bar codes printed on my laserjet work great.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  23. Errata by felipeal · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A website has been set up at this place.

    That phrase suggests that the site was just created (which is not true, as the site was already mentioned at this comment, and it seems that the site is up since January 1st, at least) and by Sony, which I doubt (the site looks more like an unofficial community site). In fact, a whois query shows that:

    #whois playstation2-linux.com
    [whois.crsnic.net]

    Whois Server Version 1.3

    Domain names in the .com, .net, and .org domains can now be registered with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net for detailed information.

    Domain Name: PLAYSTATION2-LINUX.COM
    Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.
    Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net
    Referral URL: http://www.opensrs.org
    Name Server: NS1.SCEA.COM
    Name Server: NS2.SCEA.COM
    Updated Date: 15-jan-2002

    1. Re:Errata by ADRA · · Score: 2, Informative

      That means you have to whois opensrs's whois database revealing:

      Registrant:
      Sony Computer Entertainment America
      919 East Hillsdale Blvd.
      2nd Floor
      Foster City, CA 94404
      US

      Domain Name: PLAYSTATION2-LINUX.COM

      Administrative Contact:
      Department, Legal domainadmin@scea.com
      919 East Hillsdale Blvd.
      2nd Floor
      Foster City, CA 94404
      US
      650 655 8000

      Technical Contact:
      Hostmaster, SCEA hostmaster@scea.com
      10075 Barnes Canyon Rd.
      San Diego, CA 92121
      US
      858-824-5500

      Billing Contact:
      Department, Legal domainadmin@scea.com
      919 East Hillsdale Blvd.
      2nd Floor
      Foster City, CA 94404
      US
      650 655 8000

      Registration Service Provider:
      The Discount Domain Registry - Register your domain for only $14.99!, support@discountdomainregistry.com
      (801) 991-5540
      http://DiscountDomainRegistry.com

      Record last updated on 11-Feb-2002.
      Record expires on 17-Dec-2002.
      Record Created on 17-Dec-2001.

      Domain servers in listed order:
      NS1.SCEA.COM 208.236.12.69
      NS2.SCEA.COM 208.236.12.67

      --
      Bye!
  24. Typical stupid retailer behaivoir by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    you know Rat-shack has ALWAYS done stupid things like this. I remember seeing some Tandy 100's destroyed because noone would buy them at $150.00 each.. and the store manager was too stupid to understand that lowering the price further was a better idea. (a rat-shack manager... wow what a glorius position eh?)

    It's moronic moves like this instead of just throwing them away or how about dumping them on a electronic junk wherehouse for a few cents?

    Most places like EIO will pay for shipping.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Typical stupid retailer behaivoir by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Its not Radio Shack per-se. All major chains destroy product. Its cheaper then other alternatives.
      Personally, I'd love it if they at least called a local not for profit orginization that specializes in used hardware and say "hey, we got these if you want them you have 2 days to pick them up."
      On a side note, I've been to radio shack several times and have yet to even see one.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Typical stupid retailer behaivoir by Alan+Cox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thank the tax system - it punishes you for not doign this kind of thing. Nor alas is it just a US problem.

      Whats sad is the tax system ought to encourage radio shack to take the box down the local school or college and throw them into the "fun stuff for electronics lessons" bucket

    3. Re:Typical stupid retailer behaivoir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By donating hardware that doesn't work to schools, government takes a double hit. The first is the tax writeoff taken by the company. The second is the disposal fee paid by the schools to get rid of unneeded hardware. :-/

      Donating the devices to Goodwill may be a better route?

    4. Re:Typical stupid retailer behaivoir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly we should air-drop Cue Cats on the
      poor folks in Afghanistan...

    5. Re:Typical stupid retailer behaivoir by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Using your logic: why would you punish Goodwill,then?

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    6. Re:Typical stupid retailer behaivoir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate poor people. :-)

  25. How does one do that thing with oscilloscope? by DodgyGeezer · · Score: 1

    I saw some cheap used oscilloscopes in a local electronics surplus store at the weekend. If I got my hands on one, how would I go about measuring the frequencies like those guys did with their Linksys? Does one have to buy an antenna, or can it be made? Do all oscilloscopes have the necessary inputs for this. Are there any other considerations? Is this directional (depending on antenna, I guess)?

    Sorry for the rather basic questions, but I'm not an EE, and I've only used an oscilloscope very briefly about 12 years ago. I really want to find out where the interference for my 2.4GHz phone is coming from, and how moving the base station helps. I also want to put an FM transmitter on my sound card, and so I want to see how that works too.

    1. Re:How does one do that thing with oscilloscope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A oscope shows you the signal in the time domain. These shots are from a spectrum analyzer, which shows you the signal in the frequency domain.

      I've never priced spectrum analyzers, but I suspect they're even more expensive than oscopes.

    2. Re:How does one do that thing with oscilloscope? by John+Miles · · Score: 5, Informative

      I saw some cheap used oscilloscopes in a local electronics surplus store at the weekend. If I got my hands on one, how would I go about measuring the frequencies like those guys did with their Linksys? Does one have to buy an antenna, or can it be made? Do all oscilloscopes have the necessary inputs for this. Are there any other considerations? Is this directional (depending on antenna, I guess)?

      The instrument used to make those screen shots is a spectrum analyzer, not an oscilloscope. Both instruments display amplitude on a vertical scale, but an oscilloscope displays amplitude versus time while a spectrum analyzer displays amplitude versus frequency. They are very different tools, and any serious RF hacker will own both.

      In general, an analyzer is much more sensitive (they normally display RF signal power on a log10 scale, so their dynamic range in voltage terms can exceed 100,000,000:1.) If you had a fast-enough/fancy-enough oscilloscope, you could run an FFT on its display and get the same basic information, but the SA is still the tool of choice for most RF work above 500 MHz. The insanely-fast scopes that can do microwave FFT analysis come with Ferrari-size price tags (literally), and they still don't have the dynamic range of a $3,000 spectrum analyzer. Different horses for different courses.

      Sorry for the rather basic questions, but I'm not an EE, and I've only used an oscilloscope very briefly about 12 years ago. I really want to find out where the interference for my 2.4GHz phone is coming from, and how moving the base station helps. I also want to put an FM transmitter on my sound card, and so I want to see how that works too.

      For both of those purposes, a spectrum analyzer would be the right way to go. An analyzer capable of 2.4 GHz coverage can be had for under $2K on eBay, but not much less. Some 802.11 hardware can give you reasonably-decent pictures of the 2.4 GHz spectrum, so I'd investigate that possibility first. :)

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    3. Re:How does one do that thing with oscilloscope? by Paranoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They weren't using an oscilloscope; they were using a spectrum analyser. Think winamp/xmms. One display shows you sound waves going by, like an oscilloscope. Another puts that data through an FFT and shows you the frequency domain (bass on the left, treble on the right), like a spectrum analyser.

      --
      Paranoid
      Bwaahahahahaa.
    4. Re:How does one do that thing with oscilloscope? by jfunk · · Score: 2

      Just to add a couple of points to your very good post:

      1) This guy's spectrum analyzer output looks too perfect, which makes me think that it's not very sensitive at all. This guy also needs to do some serious calibration on it, as the line is way too "thick"

      2) Back in school, we had spectrum analyzers that used regular oscilloscopes for display. They're a cheap, but very good alternative. I forget exactly who made ours, but they were based out of Quebec

    5. Re:How does one do that thing with oscilloscope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This looks fine if you feed the output of the linksys through an attenuator and a cable to the analyzer. Without knowing the setup and the settings and model of the SA, it's hard to tell what the display should be like.
      As for the SA module, it was probably a swept IF type where you'd need a storage scope to get a usable display. You can use old Tek plug ins for that. (Still need storage scope, though)

    6. Re:How does one do that thing with oscilloscope? by John+Miles · · Score: 2

      Yep, the old Tektronix 7000 scopes had quite a few spectrum analyzer plugins (7L5, 7L12, 7L14, 7L18). There were probably a lot of other manufacturers doing the same thing -- it was a good idea.

      Besides using too wide a resolution bandwidth to distinguish the apparently-unwanted sidebands from the information-carrying ones, he might have gotten some blurring due to excess CRT intensity cranked up way high (to make the photos look OK, maybe).

      He still gets major points for actually measuring the WLAN hack instead of the usual hand-waving I-got-50-HP-from-my-new-coffee-can-exhaust approach. I think his conclusion is basically valid: the sidebands are undesirable IMD-like artifacts, growing at a faster rate than the main lobe's power is increased, but they're not likely to be strong enough to be a real nuisance to anyone.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    7. Re:How does one do that thing with oscilloscope? by John+Miles · · Score: 2

      This guy's spectrum analyzer output looks too perfect, which makes me think that it's not very sensitive at all.

      Also, that "clean" look is just video filtering in action. Perfectly normal. It looks fine to me, except that I would probably have taken the shot at 100 kHz RBW instead of 1 MHz or 3 MHz like he did.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  26. Iridium's reincarnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Many of you may be surprised to learn that Iridium (famous for trying to compete with cell phones and failing miserably) is still throwing up satellites (I sure was). The article on CNN tells of the technical woes of getting this particular Delta II off the pad in Vandenberg as Iridium tries to put five more spares into orbit."

    Iridium was bought by a company no one had ever heard of, for a bargain price -- after "securing" a long term contract from the US Government that basically pays for their operating costs. Any additional commercial subscribers is just gravy.

    Common speculation is that this company is really a front for one or more of the many three-letter agencies in Washington that saw an opportunity to establish a secure means of global communication.

    1. Re:Iridium's reincarnation by jamesl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or to keep someone else's three-letter agency from establishing a secure means of global communication.

    2. Re:Iridium's reincarnation by quadra · · Score: 1

      It's not a front for anything. We're here to sell our phones to the people who need it. There's plenty of them out there. The old Iridium just didn't know how and where to find them.

    3. Re:Iridium's reincarnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you so sure it's not SD6?

  27. Maybe They Have Rabies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    From a local RadioShack guy, "If your Cue:Cat begins to foam at the mouth, smash it with a hammer. Your kids will understand. If possible, get another before they notice..."

  28. Cue::Cat Perl Module? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone here at work inquired as to the existence of a Cue::Cat Perl module. If nothing else, its already named properly. :)

  29. I can't believe they lasted this long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe they lasted this long. I think Radio Shack is upset that more people got them for the linux hack than to use as intended. I remember after I got mine after I scanned my Coke can for the 5th time I unplugged it and through in my pile of Computer Crap.. DPH

  30. Digital Convergence by felipeal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is even more interesting is the fact that Digital Convergence is still alive!
    It looks like they changed their business plan (of course) and are now *selling* the CueCat reader and books (this last one is a ROFL site. Look at the titles: Online Weight Loss Assistant, WAR ON TERROR (PHASE ONE: AFGHANISTAN & USAMA BIN LADIN), and so on...)

    1. Re:Digital Convergence by antistuff · · Score: 2, Funny

      It gets even funnier when you look under the picture of the cuecat and it says "available now for windows operating systems".

      i bet thats what they thought the first time.

    2. Re:Digital Convergence by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      I met some of the guys that work (or worked?) for DC about two years ago in a bar in Richardson, Texas. They were pretty confident back then I can tell you. One of the guys insisted on paying the ~$200 tab because he was "basically rich". I got a kick out of that. I guess none of those guys is rich in any sense now. Bwahahahahahaaaaaa :)

    3. Re:Digital Convergence by donglekey · · Score: 1

      Hahaha sure pal, you can have something for nothing, it always works out that way! Thanks for sharing so everyone can have a good laugh at his arrogance.

  31. Headline by Mwongozi · · Score: 4, Funny
    For some reason I missed the word "Slashback" on this headline and thought it was a story about interfacing your cuecat with your PS2 and using it to play games.

    Now that would be cool.

    1. Re:Headline by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I did that with my cuecat, but then it got chased away by a pack of AIBOs.
      damn sony.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, you could play that wonderful game, grocery store checkout scanner

      woo hoo

  32. Re:sombrero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I salute you! My personal best is three in one day. *sigh* That was when I had time in my life.... what's that again? College... ugh...

  33. Re:sombrero? by canadian+troll · · Score: 0

    4! fuck buddy... you're the FP machine... best i've ever done was at christmas... got the FP for Norad tracking santa. i was damn proud.
    Cheers to you dude!

  34. One doesn't by dlleigh · · Score: 2, Informative

    The instrument used was a spectrum analyzer. An oscilloscope looks at signals in the time domain and a spectrum analyzer looks at them in the frequency domain. Spectrum analyzers are much more complicated and much pricier than oscilloscopes.

  35. Why not use bottles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of smashing them with hammers, they could make BonzaiCueCats!

  36. Maybe its like bagels? by clump · · Score: 3, Informative

    Talk to anyone that works in a bagel or donut shop and they will tell you that they throw away hundreds/thousands of units a week. Basically what isn't purchased is discarded. Surely we can think to give the units to the homeless/hungry/needy-cause, but there is apparently a legal reason not to do so. Perhaps fear of a lawsuit or maybe fear of propagating freeloading?

    1. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Surely we can think to give the units to the homeless/hungry/needy-cause, but there is apparently a legal reason not to do so.

      I used to work at Publix and asked them the exact same question. Stores can't give out food because if a homeless man gets sick, the stores could be sued. Of course, Im sure homeless people would sign a release in a second for some free fried chicken...

      --
      the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
    2. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      Near where I live, there's a pizza shop (Hard Times) which actually, at the end of the night, gives away its unsold slices of pizza and stuff to the homeless.

    3. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by BJH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here in Japan, 7-11s put out their unbought food in big plastic bags, and ignore the gentlemen hanging around waiting to leap on the bags the moment the door closes. There's an unspoken agreement that it's OK for them to take the food.

    4. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by seann · · Score: 1

      Again, here in canada Tim Hortons (Think Star Bucks * 203) gives their donuts to local soup kitchens, as well other donut shops do too.

      I can't believe how in-generious America can be with buisness practices, even after seeing that one guy who drives around and collects old food and then distributes it on Dateline.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    5. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Talk to anyone that works in a bagel or donut shop and they will tell you that they throw away hundreds/thousands of units a week. Basically what isn't purchased is discarded. Surely we can think to give the units to the homeless/hungry/needy-cause, but there is apparently a legal reason not to do so.

      My first job ever was at a franchise of a certain somewhat large fast-food chain, and it wasn't long before I asked why the food that was "QC'd" was pitched instead of held and shipped off to one of the local shelters. Liability was the primary reason...if some bum got sick off of a freebie burger, he could've contacted any of the hundreds of ambulance chasers in this town and sued the store into oblivion. It was hella wasteful...about the only thing you could do is keep an eye on production to minimize the waste, but it was nearly impossible to eliminate it completely.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by nomadic · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's an idiotic situation that could be easily remedied through legislation; New York City has an organization called City Harvest that collects food from restaurants and stores, which aren't liable for any problems arising from the food.

    7. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 1

      Every restaurant worth eating in in NYC has a regular pickup by city harvest. There may be an Alice Waters influence here. The cheap restaurants seem less likely to donate. (I think they use the food whether it's fresh or not) Second Harvest has a reputation for doing similar work nationally. Politely suggest an organization like this to your local restaurant, bakery, etc.

      To get back on topic , http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&am p;q=donate+computers

    8. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by MathJMendl · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should just license the food to the shelters under the BSD license! Here is food...do what you will with it.

      --


      "I have not failed. I've simply found 10,000 ways that won't work." --Thomas Edison
    9. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Better to use the GPL. Make them cough up their modifications.

      Food wants to be Free!

    10. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by rhost89 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but what do they do about "Re-Distribution in origional or binary form must be acompanied by this copyright" if you get what i mean. Ohh dont tell me, thats too much information ;9

      --
      I will bend your mind with my spoon
    11. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by CrazyLegs · · Score: 2
      I've run into this, too. My company upgraded its PC inventory a few years back and, consequently, we ended with (literally) thousands of surplus, high-end 486s. My idea was to get these PCs out to some schools, daycares, community groups, etc. (who would LOVE to have h/w of even this calibre) and, in return, my company would get some good karma (win-win). As well, we had staff offering to work on their own time to refresh the o/s on each machine (to deliver pristine h/w).

      Well, lawyers got involved and were not happy with any technical solution we offered up to ensure all company data on these PCs was truly wiped clean. In the end, the only solution they felt acceptable was to rip out every drive and DRILL A HOLE THEM! Management, anxious about vague liability issues, rolled over in favour of the lawyers.

      Needless to say, the PCs never got distributed to anyone who could use 'em, and my company ended up paying a PC salvager $200 per PC (!!!) to perform the aforementioned drilling exercise. Does the world suck sometimes or what?

      --

      CrazyLegs

      "Pork!!" said the Fish, and we all laughed.

    12. Re:Maybe its like bagels? by vicviper · · Score: 1

      Just consider that a core dump... :)

  37. get help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  38. Don't forget by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that every product is a liability forever. This was/is a big problem for small aircraft manufacturers...their planes easily last 50 years or more. 60 years later, the 8th owner crashes it because the fuel filter got clogged, and guess who get's sued?

    And did you ever see the Simpsons episode where Homer bought the trampoline?

    No lawyer would ever advise a company to give away overstock when they could be destroyed instead.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
    1. Re:Don't forget by CityZen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder how things would be if we didn't have such "infinite" room in our landfills.

      America, where stuff is so plentiful we have to throw away a lot of it before it ever gets used.

    2. Re:Don't forget by psych031337 · · Score: 2
      that every product is a liability forever. This was/is a big problem for small aircraft manufacturers...their planes easily last 50 years or more. 60 years later, the 8th owner crashes it because the fuel filter got clogged, and guess who get's sued?

      Hmmm... I don't get it? Does the law distinguish between large and small manufacturers? When was the last time Boeing or Airbus got sued for a plane that came down? All I ever hear is the airlines shelling out big money and the manufacturer pre-emptively sending experts to find out what went wrong and how it could have been prevented.

      So basically, I think the liability is stuck to the people who do the mandatory inspections and overhauls on the machine. A clogged fuel filter is very certainly a part subject to wear and therefore something to be checked repeatedly and changed if needed. Would someone get through with suing Dodge or Ford because he rear-ended into a truck with nearly no brake pads left on his car? I doubt it.
      --
      +++ath0
    3. Re:Don't forget by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The potential problem is the same for large and small manufacturers. The difference is that the big planes tend to be cared for more rigorously, and are less likely to be hanging around in someone's hangar for years, then flown again.

      Your brake pad and fuel filter scenarios both fall into the category of "they should have warned me." Remember the guy who broke his neck and was paralyzed after diving into the surf (he hit a sandbar.) The city, you see, "should have warned him." Caution: Ocean is not bottomless. Ocean lined with sand. Also, do not inhale water as injury or death may result.

      A more plausible scenario in the Cue Cat case: a child takes one apart and chokes on one of the pieces.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    4. Re:Don't forget by billcopc · · Score: 2

      A more plausible scenario in the Cue Cat case: a child takes one apart and chokes on one of the pieces.

      That's not the Cue:Cat's fault, it's just plain old stupidity; not the kid's, but the parents'. Why did they let a young child tinker with such a 'dangerous' device ? Where the hell were they when he learned to use a screwdriver and took the thing apart ?

      The reason I generally dislike the USA is because the legal system encourages people to blame others for their own faults. "I whacked my finger with a hammer. I'm suing the hammer manufacturer!" Up here in Canada, if you whack your own finger, the lawyer will merely sympathize with you and tell you to buy a fricking band-aid. If you were so foolish to present your case to a judge, he'd probably laugh his head off and have you thrown out.

      A lawyer isn't a substitute for common sense.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    5. Re:Don't forget by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      I think you're right to use "was". I seem to recall a limit of liability for small aircraft manufacturers being passed, which was the reason Cessna got back into making singles.

    6. Re:Don't forget by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      Trust me, nobody hates that aspect of our legal system more than a responsible American.

      Lucky me for hitting on the one item that makes you "generally dislike" us.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
  39. The Kozubik Article by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I would say this article is worth the read, but I have to disagree with its conclusion.

    I fully agree that any material placed on publically accessible web servers should be referencable under the "fair use" doctrine. However, I think the court's descision is correct in light of this. Mr. Kozubik's main complaint seems to be that the behavior of browsers as regards linking are entirely arbitrary. He is correct. However, fair use is by its very nature a doctrine which will be interpreted on a case by case basis, respecting precedent.

    Rather than fearing, as he does, that the court will constantly have to "revise" the decision as technology changes, I think courts will be able to read the intent and wisely apply it to many other decisions. After all, a court decision is not a law, defined by the precise wordings, but rather a carefully considered opinion on the burden of evidence. Future courts should be able to apply the same fundamental distinction--linking that is designed to automatically reproduce the work vs linking that is designed only to show the location of the work--irregardless of the precise technology involved.

  40. nastiness by jaavaaguru · · Score: 3, Funny

    The picture of the modulated signal from the WAP11 on the HP8565a should be rated PG due to explicit content :-)
    I mean, what does the 1st one look like to you?

  41. (CueCat) Blockbuster does the same thing... by Herak · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...and probably other places as well.

    My friend works at blockbuster, and he says that periodically they'll be told to destroy videos or games that are no longer being sold.

    It's worth mentioning that not one thing is ever *actually* destroyed-- that's one of the few perks of a minimum wage behind-the-counter job.

    My guess on why this happens is that the original distributer (who sold the videos to Blockbuster or CueCat's to Radio Shack) made Blockbuster or Radio Shack sign a contract saying explicitly that they couldn't give extras of these items to their employees. If Radio Shack is in effect giving away CueCats to all their employees, then none of the employees are going to go out and buy new CueCats. The decision isn't in the hands of Radio Shack's management at all, but in the contract with Radio Shack's distributor.

    In other words, Radio Shack doesn't care if they're destroyed or not, but they tell the employees to destroy them in order to avoid legal trouble.

    Hope that helps

    1. Re:(CueCat) Blockbuster does the same thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't let the IRS catch them doing this. That's considered income for tax purposes. Blockbuster and the employee would be on the hook.

    2. Re:(CueCat) Blockbuster does the same thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know of the specifics of the CueCat/Blockbuster agreements - but in two of my jobs while at Uni (supermarkets) there was a strict 'no freebies' rule.

      The reason was simply to stop theft. As soon as you let someone walk without a receipt for ANYTHING - even things you wouldn't ever charge for like the big cardboard Kylie used to promote her CD - you open up the floodgates for staff to steal other stuff (or so was the logic of the management)

      At the second of these they started charging a penny for things - so you had to go through the checkout and get a receipt.

      I guess this is a common policy - just to stop people claiming 'but my boss said I could have it for free!!!'

    3. Re:(CueCat) Blockbuster does the same thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nonsense... I used to work at RadioShack.. and yes they do destroy things. It's a seriously fireable offense if you don't.

    4. Re:(CueCat) Blockbuster does the same thing... by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. As other posters have pointed out, you can get fired at a bookstore for taking home coverless books.

      When I worked as a stock clerk at the now defunct TG&Y stores, we had to destroy paperbacks. Our boss would watch us take off the covers and throw them in the dumpster. One of the assistant managers would let us de-cover the ones we want them and stack them beside the dumpster (particularly if there was one he wanted) and we could swing around after the store closed and pick them up, but we were warned that officially we could be fired and the store sued if we were caught...

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  42. Linux vulnerabilites?!?! by Pedahzur · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think everyone needs to check their numbers. While many of these updates are being labeled Linux vulnerablities, most of them are vulnerabilites in software that comes with Linux.

    Take a look at the LWN article again. It includes mailman (a mailing list manager), openssh (secure access to the box), proftpd (an ftp server), (l|m)icq, sendmail (a mail server), and an IMAP/POP server, just to name a few. When is the last time you saw Windows (including NT) come with utilities like those?

    Let's reduce this down to a common denominator: if you only include the packages that would be required to "duplicate" windows functionality, we have:
    1) the kernel
    2) KDE (for "network transparent" FTP browsing, etc [FYI no bias against gnome, just picking examples])
    3) XWindows for the GUI
    4)Apache (if we are talking NT with IIS, or 9x with PWS, which has security issues of its own
    5) a dhcp client, most likely
    6) Maybe a few others

    Now how many vulnerabilities do you have? Granted, Linux servers run other things, like POP/IMAP, FTP, etc, but if we're going to compare apples to apples, then let's include the security problems in POP/IMAP servers on Windows, and FTP, and DNS, and, and, and. The comparison is not fair in the least, as Linux is taking a hit for all the problems generated by auxillury packeges. On the other hand, Microsoft is only having to update (and only getting hit) for problems in Windows proper, and not for all the extra programs that you need to make Windows a fully functioning server!

    --
    Joshua J. Kugler
    1. Re:Linux vulnerabilites?!?! by sokeeffe · · Score: 1

      The issue here is not what issues Windows has. Why does Linux have to be constantly compared to Windows?

      If Linux has issues and vulnerablities let them be noted and fixed and get on with instead of saying "Well if we're bad then Windows is worse".

      Liux will never get the respect it needs and deserves with that attitude.

  43. Hey IBM, where's my cat dammit! by Pope · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I placed an order for a USB cue cat on IBM's eCommerce site, quite some time ago, and never got it!

    Grr... I wanted to use it with ReaderWare! I mean how cool is that software?

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:Hey IBM, where's my cat dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got a letter from IBM today stating they had exhausted their supply of tha catz. So I wouldn't hold my breath.

    2. Re:Hey IBM, where's my cat dammit! by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      I must agree, ReaderWare is cool. It's just a couple of clicks to share the same database between Linux and Windows too, if you dual-boot.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    3. Re:Hey IBM, where's my cat dammit! by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I got a USB cuecat from IBM, two actually, maybe we can work out a deal?

    4. Re:Hey IBM, where's my cat dammit! by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Sure. Whaddya need?

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    5. Re:Hey IBM, where's my cat dammit! by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      e-mail me at pborowicz@cybernet-usa.com and we can make arrangements.

  44. Thanks for the Rewrite, moron. by quadra · · Score: 1

    I have to hand it to Guppy06's for putting such a negative spin on the successful launch of 5 more Iridium sattellites. The technical woes were really quite minor (ie. Weather) .. and certainly worth the wait to prevent the rocket from blowing up.

    1. Re:Thanks for the Rewrite, moron. by leeward · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, chill out. I take it you haven't been around /. very long. I suggest a couple beers, and who cares what Guppy06 thinks?

    2. Re:Thanks for the Rewrite, moron. by quadra · · Score: 1

      When you see all the hard work people have put into something worthwhile, and them someone puts it into a bad light, I take offense. I'm not afraid to say it.

  45. MyCueCatHatesYou.com.... by hangdog · · Score: 1

    ...would be funny, but probably not as funny as this.

  46. Do you.... by Merconium · · Score: 1

    Use a special hammer with Howie Long's smiling face on it?

  47. Amature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amature.

  48. Just imagine... by fm6 · · Score: 2

    A Beowulf Cluster of these!

    1. Re:Just imagine... by DCMonkey · · Score: 1

      That'd be like herding (cue) cats.

      --
      DCMonkey
  49. does this break the EULA? by hashish · · Score: 0

    You'd have to open it to break it!.....

  50. Destroying Stock by Credne · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is common in most large businesses to destroy extra stock. I used to work summers doing a parts inventory at a few auto dealerships and they destroyed all kinds of hardware then reported the numbers back to the manufacturer for credit.

  51. no big deal guys by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    The state of DE has this thing going on - dont
    let children go hungry yet they dump tons of
    food at the school i goto at the Univ. Center
    cos its more than 2hours old - sheesh

    1. Re:no big deal guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Methinks you (and most others in this thread) are a little hasty with the "Sheesh".

      Stop and consider your reaction to the headline: Fifty children die of posioning from donated food? Do you think, "At least the state was trying to help the children", or do you think "Those bastards! What were they thinking? Trying to pass off garbage as meals?!"

      Yeah. That's what I thought.

      And as for the schools. What are they going to do with a truckload of Barbara Cartland romances?

  52. Destroy the :Cue:Cats? by protein+folder · · Score: 1
    Can they destroy them by cuecatapaults?

    sorry, all protein marginal stability and only a 166-MHz Pentium to play games on make Protein_Folder a lame-joke maker MORE STABLE LESS FUNCTION?! AAAAH!!

    --
    Your mind is squeezed by a blast of pain!
  53. It's economics by extra88 · · Score: 2

    It made sense to destroy the Tandy 100s rather than sell them below wholesale. Someone who bought one of those Tandy 100s might have otherwise bought something at a regular price thereby "cheating" the store of the sale of a profitable item.

    Even the "electronic junk warehouse" doesn't make a lot of sense for a manager who gets paid the same in any case. Dealing with the warehouse would require all kinds of extra effort to get the stuff packaged, shipped and actually paid for. The company obviously has the necessary paperwork for when inventory is destroyed but they probably don't for when inventory is resold. That's probably not a decision they want to leave in the hands of a mere store manager. "Now that there are P4s out, we'll never sell these PIIIs, I guess I'll make room by unloading them at the junk warehouse for 75% cost."

  54. Destroy the Cue Cats?!?!? Hell No! by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 1
    Anonymous Radio Shack Employee should be selling that shit on eBay for five bucks a piece!

    Low-paid Radio Shack Manager: "So, did you destroy all those CueCats like I asked?:

    Anonymous Radio Shack Employee: "Yes sir!"

    Cha-Ching! $$$$$$$$$$$$

    1. Re:Destroy the Cue Cats?!?!? Hell No! by MathJMendl · · Score: 4, Informative
      --


      "I have not failed. I've simply found 10,000 ways that won't work." --Thomas Edison
  55. Re:looniest destruction story I ever heard. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Interesting
    At a Yamaha Music warehouse.

    When stuff is imported via cargo ship from Japan, a certain number of damaged units are expected, and so they ship extra ones in order to make up for this. On paper, it all works out in the insurance, and so everybody is happy.

    However, when a shipment arrives with no damage, these 'extra' items must now be paid for by the receiver. Since some of these items are sometimes worth tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars, when you suddenly have to pay for more than you bargained for, it hurts the balance sheet.

    A friend of mine described how a government tax agent and several company officers had to witness the destruction of a perfectly working, hand-crafted, grand piano. Warehouse workers raised and dropped the two ton monster fifteen times from a forklift before it was destroyed to the point where the tax agent would allow it to be written off.

    Spend a month hand crafting a top of the line musical instrument, ship it overseas, and then have it destroyed. All just to satisfy the red tape. This is so Muggle/Douglas Adams, it makes my head spin!

    I almost look forward to the day when society is decimated by a comet!


    -Fantastic Lad

  56. The only way to get rid of a cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to get rid of a cat (cue or not) is the proper use of a 5 pound mall.

  57. Nah.. by Tom7 · · Score: 2

    Mine is still providing a nice warm red night-light via the PS/2 power... I'm not selling!

    Anyway, though I'd like to believe it, I don't think it's the IP tactics that did them in. The simple fact was that they had an absolutely retarded business plan. Nobody wants to scan barcodes from a magazine. It wasn't even fun for the novelty value.

    1. Re:Nah.. by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I know it was probably the braindead idea that really put them under. But the bad publicity and mainstream media airing of their intentions on tracking individuals with those innocent looking little kittens couldn't have helped.

      I never did actually scan a product to see what happened, and never got around to installing the software.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    2. Re:Nah.. by TokyoJimu · · Score: 2, Funny

      > It wasn't even fun for the novelty value.

      Reminds me of the early '90s in Japan when business cards started sporting barcodes, encoded with the phone and fax numbers printed on the card.

      I could never quite grasp why anyone would want to use a scanner to scan the number, which would then output the touch-tones to the phone, instead of just punching eight buttons.

      I admit I'm not totally immune to technology for technology's sake, but...what were these people thinking!

  58. Think about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand the Radio Shack policy toward the Cue Cats, but I can understand the policy in general. It's a protection method. If stores gave their employees unsold, returned, or defective merchandise you can imagine that all of the sudden there would be an increase in these items. A grocery worker could "misplace" a package of steaks in the back of the freezer until the expiration date passed. An Office Depot worker could cut a wire in a piece of electronic equipment and then take the "defective" item home etc. It's ugly, but it's a cost of business...

    1. Re:Think about it... by sjames · · Score: 2

      An Office Depot worker could cut a wire in a piece of electronic equipment and then take the "defective" item home etc. It's ugly, but it's a cost of business...

      That much is true, however, a moment's thought would solve the problem without shameful waste. There are many charities that might be able to salvage the items. Schools might find it worthwhile to have students salvage useful items out of the waste pile.

      Also, if the item is so cheap that it costs more to see if it works than to just destroy it, it's way overpriced on the shelf.

      As for the example of the steak, I'll bet there are dozens of shelters that could find something worthwhile to do with it.

      The corperates should also consider that what goes around comes around. Perhaps their employees and customers wouldn't hold them is such contempt that they don't even think it's 'really' wrong to shoplift or otherwise cheat them if they didn't seem to have complete contempt for any value other than the dollar.

  59. Open Source CueCat Software by ghastard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In curiosity I ran a quick search on google for the cuecat, and came up with a site that has info on a surprising amount of software that acts as an interface for the kitty. It makes me regret not picking up a few while they were availiable. I know I'd take a free (and useable) barcode scanner any day.

    If only I had known!

    Ah well, I'll just look in the dumpster behind one of the radio shacks near me. I hope the employees at it are too lazy or don't have enough aggression to smash them.

    1. Re:Open Source CueCat Software by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Me i took great pleasure in taking a diagnal cutter to each and every one of those stupid felines that we had still and personally put them in the compactor

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  60. Re:Irridium is still sending stuff up? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are being used by the CIA, military and state depts. to communicate everywhere on the earth. Plus there are still ships at sea and oil rigs that benefit from them.

  61. Re:looniest destruction story I ever heard. . . by psamuels · · Score: 1
    A friend of mine described how a government tax agent and several company officers had to witness the destruction of a perfectly working, hand-crafted, grand piano.

    Gee, thanks, I'm about to cry now. That's just wrong. No Yamaha grand piano should have to suffer that fate. Where was PETP?

    --
    "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
  62. Re:looniest destruction story I ever heard. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please. Yamahas are a dime a dozen.

    Now destroy a Steinway... That's sacrilege.

  63. The first thing you thought.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "dick!"

    come on, admit it....

  64. Preventing "accidental" damage to merchandise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No sensible grocery worker would misplace meat in the freezer until it expired and take it home. You'd risk food poisoning that way. They'd print up an expiration label that expired today, label the meat, put it in the freezer, and then discover it...

    I used to do time and motion studies at a grocery store company, back when I was an industrial engineering coop student in college. Some "shrinkage" was expected, but employees were also expected not to rip off the company too much. Somehow the number of donuts coming out of the fryer in the morning was always 6*N+5, with the extras that didn't quite make a saleable package appearing about when the coffee was ready; it's one of those miracles of mathematics.

    1. Re:Preventing "accidental" damage to merchandise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Somehow the number of donuts coming out of the fryer in the morning was always 6*N+5, with the extras that didn't quite make a saleable package appearing about when the coffee was ready; it's one of those miracles of mathematics. "

      Ahhhhh, the miracles of Mathematics! Nice turn of phrase. Kudos!

  65. Re:Irridium is still sending stuff up? why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DOD awarded a contract to Iridium Satellite LLC who now owns the constellation. The contract is for some $70 million for a couple of years for global sat. phone service. Iridium Satellite LLC is a new entity that bought the assets of the former Iridium LLC. They got a good deal too: $5 billion in assests (most of the $ in the spacecraft) for about $25 million!

  66. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    koudelka is cool

  67. Worst Thing About This Slashback by Babbster · · Score: 1

    Iridium continues putting up satellites while DirectTV and DishNetwork continue over-compressing their channels...Ouch.

  68. Re:looniest destruction story I ever heard. . . by psamuels · · Score: 1
    Please. Yamahas are a dime a dozen.

    Hey! What website? I'd gladly pay a dime for just one. (:

    Now destroy a Steinway... That's sacrilege.

    So say you. Call me a snob, but I don't care for Steinways at all. Never have. The keys are too mushy, the quiet end of the dynamic range is hard to get right. I'll take the crisp sound & feel of a Yamaha over a Steinway any day of the week.

    --
    "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
  69. Food can be donated instead of tossed! by TrinSF · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the US, food doesn't *have* to be tossed. There's a national organization, Second Harvest, that arranges for surplus food donations. I think their programs vary depending on location, but in Atlanta, they have trucks that come to restaurants and grocery stores to pick up, and regular drop off points. The food goes from the restaurants to soup kitchens and food assistance pantries, where it is used or handed out in an organized fashion. They also do larger scale projects like getting surpus produce from one region in the country to another.

    As far as I'm aware, in some places restauranteurs are misinformed about local rules for food donation. Second Harvest and similar organizations work to provide correct information as well as the go-betweens to organize and monitor such donations.

    A quick survey on the net for "surpus food" or "food rescue" (a common term for this) turned up several meta-lists of organizations, including this one which has listings for the US and Canada. It seems like there's more a misperception of legal reason that actual restrictions.

  70. Radioshack employees are fucking evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever been to radioshack? They are fucking used car salesmen working with cell phones. They get trained and shit to use mind control tactics to sell phones and warranties to you. A close relative of mine is the manager of a radioshack, and she had to read like 10 books on how to basically brainwash her customers into buying shit by using special words when speaking to them before getting into her current position. Radioshack is almost as bad as amway. Almost.

    I would be ashamed to work at radioshack. (in a store. regional managers and up are sittin' pretty)

    1. Re:Radioshack employees are fucking evil by qqtortqq · · Score: 1

      Its called being on comission, just like car salesmen, etc.
      The more they sell, the more they get paid. Wouldn't you try to sell as much as possible if your paycheck depended on it?

    2. Re:Radioshack employees are fucking evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG dude thier "Service Plan" is AMAZING! Buy something there wait for the new gizmo that's similar but better so come out piss inside said item watch the pretty sparks...then take it in after it dries and demand the newer spiffier product and YOU WILL GET IT. I know I used to work for thier service dept.

    3. Re:Radioshack employees are fucking evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's called crazy radioshack salesperson not talking to the poor geek with the batteries in his hand and bum rushing me because I'm looking at a cell phone brochure at the information kiosk outside of the store. these guys are trained sales assassins, don't underestimage them.

    4. Re:Radioshack employees are fucking evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and don't underestimate my typos either.

    5. Re:Radioshack employees are fucking evil by McSpew · · Score: 2

      I worked at RadioShack for 8 years. Back when "Radio Shack" was still two words.

      Yes, they pay their salespeople commission. Commission is the difference between RadioShack and Best Buy. Ever tried to get somebody at Best Buy to explain the differences between the various DirecTV receivers they sell? Good luck. How about the benefits of TiVo or UltimateTV? Not likely.

      And how often have you gone into a store and bought something, only to get it home and discover you didn't have all the little accessories or other crap you needed to make it all work? At RadioShack, the good salespeople make sure you know about all the accessories before you leave the store.

      And because they work on commission, the best RadioShack salespeople show everybody the latest cool toys they're selling. Cellphones? RadioShack was far and away the biggest retailer of cellphones forever. DirecTV? RadioShack again. Digital cellphones/PCS? RadioShack.

      And you're damn right they try to sell as much as possible. What's wrong with that? It's good for them and it's good for RadioShack. And if they do it properly, it's good for the customer, too.

      Okay, yes. I still have stock in the company. Go buy some shit there!

    6. Re:Radioshack employees are fucking evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently a basic command of the English language, or any language for that matter, is not a prerequisite for working at the service dept of RadioShack.

    7. Re:Radioshack employees are fucking evil by spudnic · · Score: 2

      This is exactly the reason why I like Best Buy. Now I know I'm probably not the common customer, but I probably know more about what I'm interested in purchasing than any sales person ever would having done most of my research on the web before stepping foot in the store. I go in Best Buy and don't have to worry about being hassled by people working on commision. They are always polite and offer to help, but I just say I'm just looking and they leave me alone.

      Radio Shack used to be a great place when they weren't trying to be a mainstream consumer electronics store. I worked there for 3 years way back when. We used to have a group of electronics freak guys (building, not pluging in) who used to hang out there. They'd bring in projects they were putting together to show off and buy parts for. They even helped a lot of other customers who came in looking for just the right resistor or something. Even though I was doing computer support, I learned a lot about the bits and pieces that the stores sold.

      Those were the good times.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
  71. Misleading again! by damsgaard · · Score: 1

    What of relative security among various operating systems?

  72. I'll have one! by llama1911 · · Score: 1

    There ain't no RS in Japan....

    Anybody willing to send me a CueCat?!

    1. Re:I'll have one! by bonezed · · Score: 1

      same in Australia...

      I'd love a few CueCat's

      --
      ---- Put Sig here:
  73. Some other use by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

    Send me one. I still haven't found anyone who's willing to mail one to Canada. We're deprived up here! Send us your hand-me-down hardware, so that we may grow and learn!

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  74. on coverless books by ghostlibrary · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Apparently, in the book trade, tearing the cover off a book and throwing it in the dumpster counts as destroyed."

    Actually, it's: the bookstore gets refunded for all returned books, but postage to return them would be ridiculous, so the torn covers are sent instead as proof of non-sale.

    Many a publisher has gone under due to returnable policies. Publisher pays for print run in advance, 1 year later gets a bunch o' torn covers plus a refund request for 60% cover price for each. No books and no pay = big loss for publisher.

    --
    A.
    1. Re:on coverless books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that, and you're not even *getting* into magazines. That must be a horrorshow to work out.

  75. Re:looniest destruction story I ever heard. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd gladly pay a dime for just one.

    I believe that Fantastic Lad could hook you up with one. Some assembly required.

    BTW, you're not going to give me the satisfaction of luring you into a GPL/BSD flamewar in the other story? :-(

  76. This is somewhat alarming!! by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since policy states that something no longer useful, serviceable or sellable should be destroyed...

    Uh... what does it say in their fine print about a 'retirement plan' again???

  77. Re:looniest destruction story I ever heard. . . by psamuels · · Score: 1
    I believe that Fantastic Lad could hook you up with one. Some assembly required.

    That could work. "Hand-crafted! Twice!"

    BTW, you're not going to give me the satisfaction of luring you into a GPL/BSD flamewar in the other story? :-(

    Aha! Proof that AC is really only one person after all. Nah, go find an advocacy group or ... oh wait ... this is slashdot ... um, never mind, but you'll have to argue with someone else.

    --
    "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
  78. Re:looniest destruction story I ever heard. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a violin fan myself. The sister-in-law is a violinist in Germany, so I've learned quite a bit in the past few years. The wife is actually a timpanist, so that whole side is pretty musical.

    Aha! Proof that AC is really only one person after all.

    I'm amazed at how many posts I can throw up in an average work day... I'm sure my superiors are not impressed... :-)

  79. You can make your own spectrum analyzer attachment by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2
    Back in school, we had spectrum analyzers that used regular oscilloscopes for display. They're a cheap, but very good alternative. I forget exactly who made ours, but they were based out of Quebec

    You can make your own spectrum analyzer out of:

    An oscilloscope with a high-persistence screen and a horizontal sweep output.

    A receiver for the desired frequency.

    A handfull of components

    provided you're willing to hack up the receiver. Here's the basic drill:

    Probe the receiver's AGC feedback line to feed the osciloscope's vertical deflection circuitry. (This gives you a roughly logarithmic measure of the signal intensity at the center of the IF passband on the way to the detector.)

    Disconnect the AFC circuit and substitute the sweep signal from the oscilloscope - with enough conditioning (such as DC blocking capacitors and attenuating resistors) to sweep the radio rather than fry it.



    If the receiver doesn't have an AFC, or at least the part that sweeps the receiver, make your own:

    Connect one end of a diode to ground near (one of) the local oscilator(s) of the receiver. A variactor (PIN) diode works best, because it's optimized for this service. But essentially any diode will do.

    Capacitively couple the hot end to the tuned circuit of the local oscilator (with a small capacitor).

    Inductively couple the hot end to a bias and signal network I'm about to describe. The inductor should be large enough to block the RF from the oscilator but small enough to pass the audio-rate scope sweep. At the other end of the inductor connect:

    A resistor to ground and another to a handy bypassed power supply connection, providing a voltage that back-biases the diode - say a half-volt - and also providing a load resistance for the incoming sweep signal.

    A capacitor-resistor series combination to the wire from the sweep output of the oscilloscope.

    Pick your resistors to get maybee a quarter-volt of the sweep to appear at the diode junction. (I'm guessing about these voltages, so play around a bit.)

    Set the oscilloscope for a sawtooth timebase, as slow as you can without flickering. Shazam: A low budget spectrum analyzer, at least for the tuning range of the hacked receiver. (Calibrating it is another can of worms, which I leave as an exercise for the reader.)

    How it works:

    The variable back-bias of the diode (in sync with the horizontal sweep of the 'scope) moves the conduction regions of the two sides of the diode junction closer/farter, making the diode act as a variable capacitor. This is coupled to the tuned circuit of the local oscilator, thus sweeping it in sync with the scope and dragging the receiver's tuning along with it. (Adjust the amount of sweep voltage applied to the diode to adjust the horizontal scale of the display. Don't get too close to conduction or the sweep will get very non-linear.)

    The receiver tunes across the signal range you want to observe, and the AGC feedback signal gives you a measure of the strength of the signals that make it through the IF into the detector, which you display on the 'scope's vertical deflection.

    To calibrate frequency a small crystal oscilator with a square-wave output will produce a "comb" of frequency markers that show up as little pips on the display. Calbirating amplitude is tougher.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  80. Re:looniest destruction story I ever heard. . . by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine described how a government tax agent and several company officers had to witness the destruction of a perfectly working, hand-crafted, grand piano. Warehouse workers raised and dropped the two ton monster fifteen times from a forklift before it was destroyed to the point where the tax agent would allow it to be written off.

    This makes me sick. I kinda wish I never read your comment because now I'm damn angry! The people who would do such a thing deserve to be shot (preferably with frozen shit) and then pissed on!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  81. Better yet... by WyldOne · · Score: 1

    The Cue::Dog will chase the Cue:Cat up the Cue:Tree for eating the Cue:Bird, but that would be the Q-bert game...

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  82. ^^^ MOD THIS UP ^^^ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ^^^ MOD THIS UP ^^^ This is very true and that bank needs its ass kicked!!!

  83. Re:looniest destruction story I ever heard. . . by psych031337 · · Score: 2
    A friend of mine described how a government tax agent and several company officers had to witness the destruction of a perfectly working, hand-crafted, grand piano. Warehouse workers raised and dropped the two ton monster fifteen times from a forklift before it was destroyed to the point where the tax agent would allow it to be written off.

    THIS is legal? I mean a tax inspector actually watches the destruction of an item before he allows it to written off?

    This planet never ceases to surprise me.
    --
    +++ath0
  84. Re:My fellow trolls... by Lord+Hugh+Toppingham · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Wooo Hooo.


    Be sure to check out the Blackcomb glacier. I believe the entrance is at the top of the Horstman T-bar after short hike up a small hill. Enter via the 'blow hole' if you are feeling brave. Keep up and to the right when you approach the frozen lake bed, or you will be walking a long way.


    Enjoy, and I hope your trolling sk1llz are improved by the fresh air. I know mine were.

  85. Resale Value by meggito · · Score: 1

    Whether or not iridium can compete on its own, it can always resale the use of its satelites for a wonderful profit.
    That kind of coverage is worth a pretty penny and it probably won't be hard to find someone willing to give them the hook up.

  86. ::Cue::Cat and other stupid eCrapola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would just like to take this opportunity to point out that the Flying Butt Monkey is mightier than the ::Cue::Cat!

    Although I would have much preffered to watch crq's lawyers explain to the judge that they were suing Flying Butt Monkeys for absconding with their IP.

    (Actually, I just like saying Flying Butt Monkeys...)



    AHAHAHA&nbsp HAHAHA!&nbsp HOW&nbsp DO&nbsp YUO&nbsp LIEK&nbsp THEM&nbsp APPELS,&nbsp FELLOWS? GRABOULOUS!

  87. correction: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should read:

    HAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAH&nbsp HOW&nbsp DO&nbsp YUO&nbsp LIEK&nbsp THEM&nbsp APPALS&nbsp FELLOWS?!? GRABUALsA!!!!

    If you're gonna imitate JEFFK, do it right.

  88. Returning thrown-out items by Edgester · · Score: 1

    I used to work at an office supply store and had to destroy a desk one time. The desk was returned and the manufacturer didn't want to pay to have it shipped back. The store got full credit for the desk in exchange for destroying it. I had to have another eployee witness the destruction.

    The manager also said they didn't want someone dumpster diving and then returning/exchanging the desk.

  89. Things to do with surplus equipment by jhines · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that they simply didn't donate them to a nearby school. For that kind of donation, you would get the officers of the company on the front page of the local paper, at the ceremony giving them away.

    That is very good publicity that is usually very expensive to get.

  90. Lots of places destroy... by Blue23 · · Score: 1

    A while back at a place I worked, I was getting a new laptop. My old laptop wasn't in the inventory system. As per normal we went to sell old equipment, and then a big hassle because since it wasn't in inventory the accounting departmetn didn't know who to credit the sale price to. Ended up with a several week email discussion between my boss and some higher ups in accounting.

    Mind you, this is for a machine that had been fully depreciated (known because of the time frame we purchased that model). Finally we told them we were destroying it. That was jsut fine - it had 0 value on the books. But to sell it was a major hassle and probably wasted a couple hundred bucks of people's time.

    =Blue(23)

    --
    LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
  91. Re:Irridium is still sending stuff up? why? by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Iridium has to send up spare satellites every now and again. They're in a very low orbit -- that is, an unstable orbit. A certain number of burnups per decade is par for the course. Yet one more reason why Iridium never stood a hope in hell of making a profit.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  92. Lots of good cuecat info here... by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1

    http://www.cexx.org/cuecat.htm

    This link covers...

    Reverse engineering cuecat issues...
    Cue cat and Linux...
    Privacy and CueCat
    Modifying your cuecat for enhancing your privacy ("Neutering" your cuecat).

    I got mine free from Wired magazine... It's still sitting in its box. As I recall, they received some unhappy letters to the editor after shipping these things out...

    Sam Nitzberg
    sam@iamsam.com
    http://www.iamsam.com

  93. Standard Treatment for Paperback Books by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 1


    This isn't really very suprising, even if it is disgustingly wastefull. As a past employee of Walden Books and a couple other bookstores, I can tell you that this is standared practice with paperback books.

    Ever wonder why it is sometimes so hard to find a copy of a non best-seller that came out just a couple years ago? Overstock and unmoved paperback inventory is routinely "destroyed" by your local chain bookstore.

    This destruction consists of removing the front cover and throwing the book in the garbage... Try consistantly dumbster diving your local mall bookstore and you will pull out trashbags/boxes full of paperbacks.The reasoning is that its cheaper to destroy the books than pay shipping to send them to a warehouse or different store outlet. And you know, since nobody has any interest in a book that is more than 6 months old.. \
    This alwas seemed an awful waste to me :( Its not as if there is any liability issue from giving away free books to shelters/schools.

    But thats why you will occasionally find books sans cover, or with a note saying a copy without its front cover is considered stolen.

    And you wondered why the cost of paperbacks has tripled in the last 8 years....

  94. Re: Non-Profits aren't always so co-operative.... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    Sure, your idea is great - but have you ever tried calling these non-profits or schools and asking if they want your old PC hardware?

    I tried it once, when our work got rid of 50 or so older computers (Pentium 100 and 133 class machines). Everyone started giving me lists of requirements "must have this operating system loaded on it, and we need a word processor and spreadsheet on it too", or said "Sure, we'll take them off your hands, if you bring them over here and set them up for us. We don't have anyone who can come get them from you."

    Gee... wonder why I ended up throwing them away instead....

  95. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    S H O V E L

  96. It's not about linking by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Great, so the author has just shown that "inline linking" of copyrighted material can be done in many arbitrary ways. So what!? This is not about *linking*. It's about *inline display of material one does not have copyright to in the context of other material (and possibly even without accreditation)*. Sparing the philosophical discussions over whether "intellectual" property should be considered on par with "physical" property, would you really expect it to make a difference to the court if a car thief claimed that he could steal a car through the use of a new technological widget? Or with some special car-theft-device which he only need speak English text into, in order for it to theive the car? NO! Maybe the car theif should write an essay to the judge saying "Hey, judge, it doesn't matter if I stole the car with a crowbar, because in the future there will be tons of new technological devices with which people can steal cars!" It doesn't matter *how* you do it, it is still a crime. The author is not refuting the fact that it was determined to be a crime, but merely the fact that a specific *method* was used to perpetrate the crime. The essay is completely useless.

    Personally I don't think "intellectual property" is on par with physical property, or that authors/artists should get some sort of unfair perpetual monopoly on their work. But I *also* don't think that while they *do* have this granted monopoly that people should be able to deprive them of it (for their own profit) simply because they can. What's next? "Hey judge, you can't keep us from beating up old ladies with bats and stealing their money because this can be accomplished in *arbitrary* futuristic ways. Don't you see! Ugh you are so stupid and clueless!" Arriba should have done with Google does: pop up an entire window containing the site which the image originated from, and merely highlight the image (or otherwise make note of it), so there is no ambiguity as to whether Google was the actual copyright owner.

    Here's another example. In an essay on, say, jelly beans, you have an image which says "Black ones suck! Die!". Would you really like the KKK to inline link that image, out of context, on some page of theirs? Or maybe you have a picture making fun of the president...do you really want some "terrorist" site inline linking your image? Or maybe you happen to be friends with a certain doctor which performs certain operations that might be considered controversial by certain people, and you have a picture of him nested on a site somewhere...do you really want that showing up on a site which incites people to hunt down and kill the people in the listed photographs? For these sort of reasons (even besides being deprived of profit, or banner ads) I believe content creators should have control on linking in this manner, which for all intents and purposes *is* copying without permission (who the hell cares *HOW* it happens, it still happens). Sure, the law *shouldn't* be against such linking per se (just as there shouldn't be laws against crowbars or hammers), it should just be against inclusion of such copyrighted material without the approval of the author (who still maintains copyright).

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  97. Re: Non-Profits aren't always so co-operative.... by amlutias · · Score: 1

    everybody needs a FreeGeek

  98. You forgot by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
    When was the last time Boeing or Airbus got sued for a plane that came down?

    The last time (and every time prior) an airplane came down the mfg was sued. It's SOP. Boeing was even sued after the 1999 Egypt Airline "Insh'Allah" crash into the Atlantic Ocean.

    Every single time a plane crashes the mfg is sued. Every single time -- and wait for one to come this year against Boeing for the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the basis that the planes are designed unsafely and are too easy to commandere. There's already a suit against Delta.

    Sigh.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  99. On a side note... by zaphod123 · · Score: 1

    The parent company of the one that I work for invested heavily in the cuecat.

    Our wages are froze this year... oh well.

    --
    :q!
  100. Sweet mother! by festers · · Score: 1

    Thanks for pointing that out! Looks like I'll need to buy some more :cue cats before they are all gone.

    --


    -------
    "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
  101. Dousing the peaches with kerosene (CueCat) by BillX · · Score: 1

    As I'm sure has already been mentioned, bakeries and doughnut shops typically destroy unsold product at the end of the day (rather than shipping to an orphanage or having a free "Day Old Donuts" pile), and book chains rip the covers off of unsold inventory and discard it. They have their reasons, I guess...just for fun, I'd like to walk into one of these Shacks that's still dumping CueCats on their customers. Pick up some instrumentation amplifiers, some LEDs, a few photodetectors, PS/2 connectors, etc. and walk up to the register to purchase the items in question. Right before I pull out my wallet, when the guy behind the counter hands me 5 cuecats, say "Thank you!", return my selections to the shelves and walk out.

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.