You're right, there is no guarantee. If only we could make our applications accessible via the web, so a user could access them using only their browser... oh wait. Now if only all of those browsers followed standards...
My main point is that using the 3rd party framework means you have to hire a maintainer w that skillset, typically for more $ than a core Java developer. I agree that the reason anybody uses it is because it improves the Java framework, however I've worked a bunch with various 3rd party frameworks and most owners of those applications aren't appreciative of them in the long run due to maintenance costs and sometimes even difficulty of making changes.
I thought so... the build environment does affect the final hash. However, thinking about this logically most places you can get the source code and executable from the same place... and if the executable matches... how paranoid can you be?
If you're getting the alleged source code to Windows 9 from some guy in Nigeria though, set your expectations accordingly.
The file menu on Visual Studio is better than Eclipse's UI design & features as a whole. Imho, the languages are both entirely OOP based and are very similar in syntax and functionality.
Source: I learned with AP Java moved on to ASP.NET in college upon introduction to it.
It's a well known fact that crime is a sign of society's shortfalls. Most people commit crime for a reason, few do it for the thrill (there's some). Now, building drones costs money, wouldn't that money be better spent fixing society's ills. There is no need for the government to watch us. They need to work on making us as great a society as possible and fixing problems (seems we need to watch them though.. drones all around the whitehouse!). These drone would just focus more on catching criminals then fixing whatever drove the person to commit the crime. Everybody should be able to see how this drones to catch criminals approach can quickly spiral out of control.
Also, LEO's aren't your friend, they'll do anything to get a conviction and advance their career, some are good, but most don't have a working sense of justice. Even google is more of a friend to you.
He got convicted then APPEALED based on himself going silent. Basically a legal play. A witness and shotgun shells got him convicted. Also, it's pretty obvious he's guilty of murder. He DID NOT get convicted for not answering a question.
It just might work too, if we get entirely one side in there will be nobody to resist the changes the non-existent side would try to block. What kind of changes? Minor details.
In regards to Prey, the big difference is people CHOOSE to install it, knowing the risks and concerns. Making a kill switch mandatory is just stupid. Prey is even available for smartphones: http://preyproject.com/blog/tag/mobile .
Slashdot Mirror
You're right, there is no guarantee. If only we could make our applications accessible via the web, so a user could access them using only their browser... oh wait. Now if only all of those browsers followed standards...
why do you need MS support for an app written inhouse in .NET FW 4.0?
What are you gonna ask, how to code it?
I think the more important thing is that it CAN run nowadays. How often this is used is another story.
Also, who supports Java? :)
My main point is that using the 3rd party framework means you have to hire a maintainer w that skillset, typically for more $ than a core Java developer. I agree that the reason anybody uses it is because it improves the Java framework, however I've worked a bunch with various 3rd party frameworks and most owners of those applications aren't appreciative of them in the long run due to maintenance costs and sometimes even difficulty of making changes.
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=17886
They'd be out of business in a week.
You didn't even RTFA did you?
He went to jail for hacking charges, not related to TPB.
Actually, they're using them as templates, so they're not using them directly.
I thought so... the build environment does affect the final hash. However, thinking about this logically most places you can get the source code and executable from the same place... and if the executable matches... how paranoid can you be?
If you're getting the alleged source code to Windows 9 from some guy in Nigeria though, set your expectations accordingly.
How is boxing a problem?
Anybody who isn't a massive corporation is better off sticking w the core framework for maintainability & scope purposes.
The file menu on Visual Studio is better than Eclipse's UI design & features as a whole. Imho, the languages are both entirely OOP based and are very similar in syntax and functionality.
Source:
I learned with AP Java moved on to ASP.NET in college upon introduction to it.
Berating? There is nothing suspicious about these women's accusation's timings at all... There's another b word much more fitting here.
It's a well known fact that crime is a sign of society's shortfalls. Most people commit crime for a reason, few do it for the thrill (there's some). Now, building drones costs money, wouldn't that money be better spent fixing society's ills. There is no need for the government to watch us. They need to work on making us as great a society as possible and fixing problems (seems we need to watch them though.. drones all around the whitehouse!). These drone would just focus more on catching criminals then fixing whatever drove the person to commit the crime. Everybody should be able to see how this drones to catch criminals approach can quickly spiral out of control.
Also, LEO's aren't your friend, they'll do anything to get a conviction and advance their career, some are good, but most don't have a working sense of justice. Even google is more of a friend to you.
RTFA dude...
He got convicted then APPEALED based on himself going silent. Basically a legal play. A witness and shotgun shells got him convicted. Also, it's pretty obvious he's guilty of murder. He DID NOT get convicted for not answering a question.
Think of it as... an alternative to solar panels for those that don't get a lot of sun.
Coincidentally, this sounds a lot like big pharma.
Perhaps they're tired of all the FBI /NSA requests and are trying to remove themselves out of that picture.
I also heard that google content inspector is a job that requires therapy.
It's called liability and according to Uncle Sam, it doesn't have to make sense.
If you really wanted to, you could enact a naked policy inside the building though. Just make sure to include no sexual harassment in capital letters!
It just might work too, if we get entirely one side in there will be nobody to resist the changes the non-existent side would try to block. What kind of changes? Minor details.
In regards to Prey, the big difference is people CHOOSE to install it, knowing the risks and concerns. Making a kill switch mandatory is just stupid. Prey is even available for smartphones: http://preyproject.com/blog/tag/mobile .
They were mining social services and phones, social services don't equal the internet k?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/06/12/heres-everything-we-know-about-prism-to-date/
Not a fan of it, but not a fan of fear mongering either.
The details don't matter, the NSA is violating the 4th by not having probable cause for the data it's been gathering from the telecom providers.
Fail,
Buy a bestbuy machine, load is w MS software, profiting both sellers. I'd imagine most best buy employees aren't as good at selling M$ as M$ is.
Your statement applies to what Best Buy already has, this won't affect it.
To clarify, larger VM scenario = 10+++ VMs with sufficient resources running simultaneously.