Slashdot Mirror


User: mirabilos

mirabilos's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
414
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 414

  1. Re:VI is everywhere. on JOE Hits 3.0 · · Score: 1

    https://mirbsd.bsdadvocacy.org:8890/MirOS/distfile s/mirbsdksh-1.6.cpio.gz

    Please report if it doesn't compile for you (but
    play with
    SHELL=$(which ksh) WEIRD_OS=1 LDFLAGS=(something)
    ksh ./Build.sh
    first (in various combinations) if it doesn't work
    at first; there are some examples (GNU, Solaris,
    Mac OSX) on top of the Build.sh file.

    Reports go to

  2. Re:VI is everywhere. on JOE Hits 3.0 · · Score: 1

    I thought that could do, but I'm still not good with
    vi - modal editors are just crazy.
    I'm using ed(1) - yes, that's right - for so long
    until I get to install joe (and heavily for scripting),
    because it's more natural than vi(1).

    Besides - edlin.exe, anyone? (Just kidding, I've not
    used edlin - there was DR DOS editor.exe around,
    which was pretty wordstar-compatible, too, just no
    search functions.)

  3. Ressource file on JOE Hits 3.0 · · Score: 1

    You might like
    https://mirbsd.bsdadvocacy.org:8890/cvs.cgi/ ~check out~/ports/editors/jupp/files/jupprc?rev=HEAD&cont ent-type=text/plain
    if you're after the good old DOS days.
    As written in the "first 10 things after install"
    thread, I'm using it myself.

    This j*rc file, called "jupprc" as a pun on a friend's
    name (a joke only Germans from a specific region may
    understand, that's why I won't go out on it), is
    loosely based upon the jstarrc file, in that it
    mimics the WordStar combos quite well.
    Additionally, it's got an easy way to insert Meta
    or any ASCII value, some better defaults (who in
    the world needs backup files? man cvs) and the
    title bar displays the current file position, row
    and column as well as offset, and the ASCII code
    of the char under the cursor, in decimal and hex.

    It's most tested under joe-2.8 which I still prefer,
    but has been fully working under a 2.9-pre version;
    I think it should work with joe-3.0, but there might
    be problems with UTF-8 because the codes are longer.
    (Help is still on ^J)

    Feedback for this file goes to

  4. Windows, UNIX on First Ten Programs on New Install? · · Score: 1

    Windows:
    - Volkov Commander (the nc clone)
    - joe (the editor)
    - lynx (the browser)
    - Services for Unix 3.5 (was: Native GNU utilities for Win32, but Interix is better)
    - mirbsdksh (http://mirbsd.bsdadvocacy.org/MirOS/distfiles/mir bsdksh-1.6.cpio.gz)
    - H+BEDV FreeAV
    - Starcraft
    - Diablo II
    - Diablo II LoD
    - CStrike 1.3

    Unix (MirOS BSD, http://mirbsd.de/):
    - joe (ports/editors/jupp)
    - GNU screen (ports/misc/screen)
    - GNU mc (ports/misc/mc)
    - DJB Daemontools (ports/sysutils/daemontools)
    - djbdns (ports/net/djbdns)
    - pine (ports/mail/pine)
    - mpg123 (ports/audio/mpg123)
    - mplayer (ports/x11/mplayer,win32,aa,other flavours)
    - rsync (ports/net/rsync)
    - acroread (including Linux emulation), or gs

    That's just my average.

  5. Re:Well, I say _no_ on Free Optimizing C++ Compiler from Microsoft · · Score: 1

    Look two, three postings above. There are no
    redistributables inside.

  6. Pretty simple on What's Your Browser Start Page? · · Score: 1

    I usually launch my web browser like
    $ lynx .

    If it has to be a graphical one, such as
    this Internet Exploder at work, I prefer
    a blank page, because it loads fastest.

  7. Re:Risky to add SMP to free *nix on SMP On OpenBSD, Coming Soon · · Score: 1

    Well, you'll have fun with pfsync, carp and
    friends in OpenBSD 3.5 then.
    Screw your cisuxxos :)

  8. Re:Yet another modern feature added to *BSD on SMP On OpenBSD, Coming Soon · · Score: 1

    Right, but W^X, Propolice, NXSTACK and NXHEAP
    give another ~6% performance reduction, which
    is not handled by everything else but the CPU.

    I don't want to miss the stability my OS has
    right now, I don't like changing 90% of the
    non-driver code in the kernel just for SMP.
    Especially if it's "just a big kernel lock",
    as some previous poster stated.

  9. Re:Yet another modern feature added to *BSD on SMP On OpenBSD, Coming Soon · · Score: 1

    Why do you mention ekkoBSD and Dragonfly, yet
    forget MirOS, which exists far longer than
    these two?

    Ow, must be because we are Europeans.

  10. Stop Trolling on NetBSD Imports XFree86 4.4.0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh my gods, the /. troll strike again.
    Why don't you have a look at the clock, look
    up the timezone UTC+1, and nod understandingly
    that a human being has made an error due to
    lack of sleep?

  11. Re:Mipft... on NetBSD Imports XFree86 4.4.0 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaargh sorry sorry

    I confused this with a German-language slashcode
    using news site. many sorry.

    it reads like "i was late, congrats to netbsd"

  12. Mipft... on NetBSD Imports XFree86 4.4.0 · · Score: -1, Troll

    zu spat. Ich war noch essen, und mein CVS-Server
    ist ein Pentium-120, sodaB meiner gerade erst
    fertig ist - in die vendor branch.

    Jetzt darf ich noch ca. 630 Konflikte beseitigen
    und danach die Konfigurationdatei fur den MirBSD
    uname updaten und gucken, ob's lauft.
    Das dauert wohl noch etwas - GruB an die schnellen
    NetBSDler.

  13. Re:Don't bother on How To Fight International OSS License Violations? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not exactly - the University counter-sued AT&T
    because they violated the BSD licence in some
    files they have taken from BSD to SYSV.

    In the end, AT&T had to retain the original
    licence, and agreed to licence a few of the
    UNIX(R) files to BSD under a BSD-alike licence.

  14. Also at FOSDEM: BSD projects on Free & OpenSource Software Weekend · · Score: 1

    The MirBSD project is here with _all_ of their
    developers and giving out CDs for a small donation;
    the height is up to you.
    We're also available for talks and short interviews
    on German or English about the project. No FAQs
    please tho, we've written them on the website ;-)

    The FreeBSD project is selling CDs for 1 Euro (or
    more; up to the customer) and giving demonstration
    and insight into two books.

    The OpenBSD people are using subliminal tricks
    (ie, chicks and T-Shirts) to show their project
    off to the public again. And they're already
    drunk before noon... luckily, no Humppa today.

  15. Re:layman's version on XFree86 4.4: List of Rejecting Distributors Grows · · Score: 1

    fontconfig has it for sure (tho it's from the
    regents of the university of california, which
    ceased to enforce the clause since 1999).

    and the FSF did not scream back then.

  16. Re:Free Software on XFree86 4.4: List of Rejecting Distributors Grows · · Score: 1

    This is one argumentation (out of several) which
    we can continue to provide KDE and GNU GNOME to
    our users.

    X-Window is part of the operating system, but not
    the GNU stuff, with the exceptions of:
    - binutils
    - gcc 2.95
    - gcc 3.2.3 (plus c++, fortran 77, objective-c, ada)
    - gpc 20030825
    - libiberty
    - libreadline
    - librx
    - cvs
    - lynx
    - rcs
    - ssfe
    - tinyirc
    - texinfo

    The licences being used:
    - GNU GPLv1
    - GNU GPLv2
    - GNU LGPLv2
    - GNU LGPLv2.1

    Not the GNU FDL, though... (gcc and binutils docs
    are available as a port in the unfree section tho).

  17. Re:Free Software on XFree86 4.4: List of Rejecting Distributors Grows · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rest assured we can legally continue to provide
    even binaries of these, left alone the ability
    to install them by means of MirPorts.

    Hint: we are distributing the advertising clause,
    and we need not care about licence compatibility
    as long as neither licence explicitly forbids
    that linking.

  18. Re:What is the issue? on XFree86 4.4: List of Rejecting Distributors Grows · · Score: 2, Informative

    They didn't neglect it being equivalent to the
    4-clause UCB licence. They just said the wording
    is different, and "if they would wanted BSD
    licencing/spirit, they should have taken the
    original UCB licence" (or something along the
    lines; dig for the email in the other /. story
    of yesterday if you need the exact text).

  19. Re:Free Software on XFree86 4.4: List of Rejecting Distributors Grows · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's actually more free than the GNU GPL or even
    the LGPL.
    It's equivalent to the 4-clause UCB licence, and
    that's why the MirOS Project (MirBSD and soon-to-be
    MirLinux, remember?) has no problem with it.

    We will import XFree86 4.4 after it's released,
    and have already incorporated the advertising
    clause (and prepared for the Apache License 2.0).

    We do also read licences, like the OpenBSD people.

  20. Re:OpenBSD too on Mandrake Blocked By XFree86 4.4 License · · Score: 1

    Why ruin?

    I just checked - there's at least one appearance
    of the 4-clause UCB licence in xc/lib/, and the
    FSF didn't cry before 1999 because of that either.

    Also, it's still BSD licenced, and we've got a ton
    of advertising clauses anyways.

    I do agree with you that they are principially
    evil, and if the XFree86 Project could be convinced
    to nuke them, that'd be ok.
    But as long as it is like this, I don't have an
    actual problem with it.

    Remember: there are two types out. One who want
    to design the superiour operating system (did
    anyone say HURD?), and one who want to build the
    system they are needing right now.

  21. Re:OpenBSD too on Mandrake Blocked By XFree86 4.4 License · · Score: 1

    MirBSD in contrast will import XFree86 4.4 when
    it's out, because that clause is not a problem.

    We can still continue to distribute GNU GPL-licenced
    applications binary which link against X-Window,
    because we are actually delivering the advertising
    clause in the accompanying documentation.

  22. Geoworks Ensemble? on GEOS Available for Download After 18 Years · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's with Geoworks Ensemble? It used to be a
    fine piece of GUIware, too...
    And since GEM has been free for years, this would
    probably complete the list (tho I'd like to get
    my hands on DOS 3.3 and Windows 2 and 3 sources
    as well).

  23. Re:No, it doesn't on Using Single Apache SSL/Non-SSL in Production? · · Score: 1

    Right; on the other hand, it still has issues,
    because of which some programmes (mozilla, wineX)
    still are compiled with -fno-stack-protector.

    In OpenBSD since release 3.3, propolice is enabled,
    as in MirBSD (http://mirbsd.de/). The latest MirBSD
    development snapshot, available in 1-2 days under
    https://mirbsd.bsdadvocacy.org:8890/current /
    (while writing this, I'm building it), has gcc 3
    with propolice, W^X (ie, memory pages are either
    writable or executable), NXSTACK and NXHEAP
    protection mechanisms, and the default apache,
    suitable for HTTP and HTTPS, comes chrooted.
    Most of that is thanks to the efforts of the
    OpenBSD guys, but in contrast to them, our apache
    httpd also has support for IPv6!

    shameless plug: we'd be glad if people tested it.

    -

    On the propolice page I referenced above, there
    are instructions on how to build FreeBSD and
    GNU/Linux with this protection - if you like
    building from source. This is especially inte-
    resting for servers - many exploits are hindered
    to work at all, or at least just crash the server
    (DoS) instead of function (remote hole).

  24. Re:No, it doesn't on Using Single Apache SSL/Non-SSL in Production? · · Score: 1

    I was more thinking about securing the daemon, not
    the content exchanged.

    Another one: use propolice (the stack protector)
    if you can.
    http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ ssp/

  25. No, it doesn't on Using Single Apache SSL/Non-SSL in Production? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestly, this is the first time I've heard that
    someone _does_ use two different servers for
    http and https.
    If you really want to increase security, use the
    new chroot facilities.