Slashdot Mirror


User: NoNonAlphaCharsHere

NoNonAlphaCharsHere's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,070
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,070

  1. Re:Google needs to focus on a few products on Google Health's Lifeline Runs Out · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not unlike when they canceled Firefly, a few geeks are devastated, hardly anyone else notices.

  2. Re:The actual damages... on Actual Damages For 1 Download = Cost of a 1 License · · Score: 2

    Actually, this is Slashdot (/.), not Backslashdot (\.). Perhaps if you communicated more precisely...

  3. Re:Pretty Lame on Recent Discovery Contains Oldest Depiction of the Tower of Babel · · Score: 1

    That would have been pretty funny if you hadn't got it backwards.

  4. Re:What is the implication here? on Charlie Kindel On Why Windows Phone Still Hasn't Taken Off · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure "permanent brain damage" was a prerequisite for that job.

  5. Re:U.S. is established on religion, so on America's Turn From Science, a Danger For Democracy · · Score: 1
  6. Re:And the other reason is... on Charlie Kindel On Why Windows Phone Still Hasn't Taken Off · · Score: 1

    Are you suggesting that Microsoft will no longer change the entire API every time the major number of the OS increments, causing everyone to completely re-architect/re-write their apps from the ground up? I suggest you go back and look at the history of every technology Microsoft has ever released, from DirectX to Windows itself, to .NET, to even their languages and compilers.

  7. Re:What is the implication here? on Charlie Kindel On Why Windows Phone Still Hasn't Taken Off · · Score: 1

    Never mind "Welcome to hell, here's your accordion"; can you imagine the hell that is "developer relations for COM/OLE/Active-X"?

  8. And the other reason is... on Charlie Kindel On Why Windows Phone Still Hasn't Taken Off · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fool me once, shame on you, lock me into an inferior OS twice, shame on the whole industry.

  9. Re:Get a clue Big Sis on Vanity Fair On the TSA and Security Theater · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A Steve Dahl so succinctly put it: "If fat, middle-aged white guys in Hawaiian shirts were blowing up airplanes, I'd expect to receive more scrutiny at airports".

  10. Re:So... on FCC Approves AT&T's $1.9 Billion Qualcomm Spectrum Purchase · · Score: 2

    What I wonder is: Where is Lily Tomlin when we need her?

    Sadly, her job was outsourced to Bangalore many years ago.

  11. Re:Remarkable on Fermilab's New Commercial Research Center · · Score: 1

    There was yet another "tantalizing hints but no actual evidence" press release a few days ago. We talked about it here.

  12. Re:Google shouldn't had given them such right on YouTube Says UMG Had No 'Right' To Take Down Megaupload Video · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You make it sound as though site operators have some kind of leeway regarding DMCA takedown notices - they don't - either they take it down, immediately, or they are in violation as well as the original poster.

  13. Re:And now we see... on YouTube Says UMG Had No 'Right' To Take Down Megaupload Video · · Score: 2

    Please. This was obviously just a case of Universal's lawyers acting in good faith, and perhaps getting a trifle overzealous. /sarcasm

  14. Re:Google shouldn't had given them such right on YouTube Says UMG Had No 'Right' To Take Down Megaupload Video · · Score: 4, Informative

    The DMCA itself is what "allows for abuse". The law was written so that site operators are required to take down if they receive a DMCA notice. BTW, have you seen the new "tell your Congresscritter to vote for SOPA/Protect IP commercials? Pack of outrageous lies -- like "stolen TV shows are costing American jobs".

  15. Re:Life Adapts on Is the Earth Special? · · Score: 2

    Humanity's boundless hubris.

    Not to worry. I'm sure when the time comes, Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck will jump into an old Space Shuttle and save the whole planet.

  16. Re:But... on Is the Earth Special? · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Awwwww. Poor baby. Did someone mildly disparage your imaginary friend with a humorous real-world observation? Maybe you should forgive him and pray for his immortal soul.

  17. Re:Life Adapts on Is the Earth Special? · · Score: 1

    They did. They flourished for hundreds of millions of years, many times longer than the dinosaurs did. Unfortunately, they went extinct 200 million years ago.

  18. Re:Coding Practices? on Java Apps Have the Most Flaws, Cobol the Least · · Score: 1

    I guess my post was too terse.

  19. Re:Coding Practices? on Java Apps Have the Most Flaws, Cobol the Least · · Score: 2

    I SWEAR I'm not making this up: a manager once criticized my code as being too terse: "people have to read and understand it before they can modify it". He saw no irony in that statement.

  20. Re:range of capability, expression, and process on Java Apps Have the Most Flaws, Cobol the Least · · Score: 1

    Indeed. The SIZE of the problem domains is apples and oranges, too. Then there's the notion that most Java programs are going to be event driven (at least to some extent), while the Cobol programs are mostly going to be batch oriented.

  21. Re:And we fell for it on Forget an Essay; Earn a Scholarship With a Tweet · · Score: 1, Funny

    I got dibbs on "Finger lickin' good!".

  22. Re:Paid Vs. Free? on Android Market Hits 10 Billion Downloads, Games Dominate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google. Period.

  23. Re:This is an issue for women on Clothier Slammed For Using 'Perfect' Virtual Model · · Score: 3, Funny

    OK, I'll use a car analogy. All the cars on the commercials have a great wax job and no dirt or water spots, and they're always shot in great light. How come I can never get my car to look like that?

  24. Re:Cheaper on Clothier Slammed For Using 'Perfect' Virtual Model · · Score: 1

    What will dimwit hot chicks do for a living now?

    I have some ideas.

  25. Re:If not the government, then who? on Bloggers Not Journalists, Federal Judge Rules · · Score: 2

    Sure; and I'm going to start by defaming Ashton Kutcher and Kim Kardashian. I'll expect to see them and their seconds on the field of honor at dawn.