Why do we have generic domain names at all? Wouldn't it be simpler to only have ccTLD's. We could then be spared all this so called "internet governance".
You could say that countries don't belong in the virtual world. But countries are mostly sociological stuctures created by humans. So they should have a place in the virtual world just as in the material world.
Yeah, using the TPM would be great. Using a pin instead of a passphrase at most startups would be much less cumbersome.
Obviously you would still need a backup passphrase when you change your motherboard or exhaust the maximum numer of pin tries.
Apple's Xcode is included in the Mac App Store. It includes GPLed stuff like GCC. Can this be a problem like VLC?
Or are the rules for the Mac App Store different from those of the iOS App Store?
Why do we have generic domain names at all? Wouldn't it be simpler to only have ccTLD's. We could then be spared all this so called "internet governance".
You could say that countries don't belong in the virtual world. But countries are mostly sociological stuctures created by humans. So they should have a place in the virtual world just as in the material world.
The whois info for openlinux.com is posted enough times, here is the output of dig which i did not see:
;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 29870 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;openlinux.com. IN NS ;; ANSWER SECTION: ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ;; Query time: 37 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.1#53(192.168.1.1) ;; WHEN: Sun Jun 18 03:15:00 2006 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 94
hecabe:~ jp$ dig openlinux.com NS
; > DiG 9.2.2 > openlinux.com NS
openlinux.com. 6403 IN NS NS98.WORLDNIC.com.
openlinux.com. 6403 IN NS NS97.WORLDNIC.com.
NS97.WORLDNIC.com. 172185 IN A 205.178.190.49
As you see those nameservers don't match the whois record. Another piece of evidence that this is a hoax.
You can do everything ifconfig + iptables using ip + tc and more.
Try to do ifconfig eth0 allmulti with ip.
With Mono it seems that there will be a Free Software implementation of .NET.
It's a shame that there is no Free Software implementation of Java2.
But the situation of both can change. For the moment I stick to plain old Unix and C...