Gay _female_ couples can have children, yes. Gay male couples can't. As to raising children, I'd be fine cutting them a tax break if they adopt, if there wasn't one already. I figure two dads is better than no one at all.
That's 9 minutes if launched from Russia. There are also nuclear subs patrolling both the Eastern and Western US seaboard (as well as US nuclear subs patrolling the Baltic Sea). You can't detect them, and they also have no warning.
I understand why straight families deserve the tax cut: the government hopes they'd procreate. I don't get why gay families should enjoy the same benefits. Other than that, I'm completely in support of grown adults doing whatever they want with their lives.
I think he's a stooge for the Clinton campaign to make her the only real candidate. I especially think so after he picked a lunatic for his running mate.
I wonder if they'll cancel Petraeus's sentence now. He was forced to end his career for much less. 2 years probation, $100K fine, security clearance revoked. Apparently it's no big deal, not even worth investigating.
It's not a "hospital" price. It's just the price of the drug, worldwide. US hospital prices are higher than that. And I think Margaret Thatcher explained many years ago that there's no free lunch, and eventually _someone_ pays for Lucentis. And that someone is not the government.
It's still intractable unless you're willing to spend $10k/yr per eye for the rest of your life. And even then it doesn't fix the symptoms completely, and merely slows the progression of the disease. That is, if you don't have a reaction to this drug, in which case you may lose an eye, or both.
And the only way to treat this is by injecting a $1K+ per shot medication into your eyeball once a month (Lucentis). And the treatment is not permanent: macular degeneration returns again and again.
No, there was only one person armed in that club: the police officer at the entrance. Moreover, he seemed to kinda suck at using his weapon. Inside, no one was armed (patrons are patted down at the entrance, and staff are not allowed to carry in this "gun free zone"), so the dude roamed the halls for almost 4 hours and shot everyone he could find. If staff was carrying at least a couple of guns, this would be over in 10 minutes tops, and far fewer people would have bled out on that dance floor.
That's not how the "madman" thing works. Your chances of ending up in the same place with one are already astronomically low, and they won't markedly change. His chances of getting shot go up exponentially if people who are licensed to carry concealed weapons actually do carry them.
How about non-compete pays the salary in the highest offer you were able to obtain, for the duration of non-compete? Every time I changed jobs, I got at least 15% raise, sometimes more than that. I don't see why I should give up this money just so my previous employer could have me not compete against them.
There's this wonderful technology, it's called concealed firearms. I don't propose that drunk patrons be allowed to bring them in (although that'd be better than the status quo), but it's really a shame that no one in the staff (save for one guy at the entrance) had a concealed firearm on them. This could be over in minutes with fairly minimal casualties. In fact, had he known he would see resistance there, he would likely have gone elsewhere. Instead the police waited for 3.5 hours (!) before storming the club. That's what they usually do, since they have no legal obligation whatsoever to protect anyone or put themselves in danger (Google "no duty to protect" if you don't believe me).
The right answer to expectations and timelines: fuck off, it will be done when it's done, but we'll do our best. At Google this is handled by setting quarterly goals, and then watching them whoosh by when the quarter ends. Or not, in this regime things often do go faster than expected. The key mechanism that makes it work is the reward structure: Google rewards launches and basically nothing else. Want a bigger bonus? Launch something. Want a promo? Launch something. And so on. And I can personally confirm: you get the behavior you reward, for better or worse. All this daily meeting bullshit would just get in the way of adults doing their work.
Let me first say this: FUCK YOU. Now let's move to the substantive critique of your reply.
OF COURSE you will be "discriminated against" if black youths commit majority of violent crimes even though they're only 16% of all youths. Specifically over 58% of homicides, and over 67% of robberies. Stop wanting to be gangsta. Clean up. Get out of the gang. Acquire some marketable skills. Find a job. Hold down a job. Do your job well and get promoted. Get married. Don't let your kid grow up without a father. It's difficult, but it has to be done in order for for more people (including well-off blacks) to treat young male African-Americans without prejudice.
The old "we are being discriminated against no matter what" shit might have worked before Obama got elected, twice. It doesn't work anymore. Clean up, show up, put in the effort, and you will succeed.
Literally none of them are teenagers. I'm in favor of seeing their mugshots, though, don't get me wrong. Pity this never happens. Democrats or Republicans, they're all owned by Wall Street.
And black males are disproportionately represented in gangs and other criminal statistics. Notice how most of those mugshots are of black men, and pictures of women are for the most part not mugshots.
Slashdot Mirror
It won't replace Medicare/Medicaid at least, since people are sure as heck not going to spend their UBI on buying expensive private medical insurance.
Gay _female_ couples can have children, yes. Gay male couples can't. As to raising children, I'd be fine cutting them a tax break if they adopt, if there wasn't one already. I figure two dads is better than no one at all.
That's 9 minutes if launched from Russia. There are also nuclear subs patrolling both the Eastern and Western US seaboard (as well as US nuclear subs patrolling the Baltic Sea). You can't detect them, and they also have no warning.
I understand why straight families deserve the tax cut: the government hopes they'd procreate. I don't get why gay families should enjoy the same benefits. Other than that, I'm completely in support of grown adults doing whatever they want with their lives.
I think he's a stooge for the Clinton campaign to make her the only real candidate. I especially think so after he picked a lunatic for his running mate.
An ICBM takes 9 minutes to "strike anywhere".
Fight an entrenched lifestyle brand with a half baked turd that runs Windows and costs about the same. That's going to fly like a lead balloon.
I wonder if they'll cancel Petraeus's sentence now. He was forced to end his career for much less. 2 years probation, $100K fine, security clearance revoked. Apparently it's no big deal, not even worth investigating.
It's not a "hospital" price. It's just the price of the drug, worldwide. US hospital prices are higher than that. And I think Margaret Thatcher explained many years ago that there's no free lunch, and eventually _someone_ pays for Lucentis. And that someone is not the government.
It's still intractable unless you're willing to spend $10k/yr per eye for the rest of your life. And even then it doesn't fix the symptoms completely, and merely slows the progression of the disease. That is, if you don't have a reaction to this drug, in which case you may lose an eye, or both.
And the only way to treat this is by injecting a $1K+ per shot medication into your eyeball once a month (Lucentis). And the treatment is not permanent: macular degeneration returns again and again.
No, there was only one person armed in that club: the police officer at the entrance. Moreover, he seemed to kinda suck at using his weapon. Inside, no one was armed (patrons are patted down at the entrance, and staff are not allowed to carry in this "gun free zone"), so the dude roamed the halls for almost 4 hours and shot everyone he could find. If staff was carrying at least a couple of guns, this would be over in 10 minutes tops, and far fewer people would have bled out on that dance floor.
That's not how the "madman" thing works. Your chances of ending up in the same place with one are already astronomically low, and they won't markedly change. His chances of getting shot go up exponentially if people who are licensed to carry concealed weapons actually do carry them.
How about non-compete pays the salary in the highest offer you were able to obtain, for the duration of non-compete? Every time I changed jobs, I got at least 15% raise, sometimes more than that. I don't see why I should give up this money just so my previous employer could have me not compete against them.
They haven't seen me naked before.
So I take it that if you were trapped inside with a crazy person for 3.5 hours you'd rather he was the only one with a weapon? Got it.
Google it, there are cases almost every year when a potential mass shootings are prevented by an armed civilian.
Making them die within minutes of opening fire is a solution to the problem. The dude was in there for almost 4 hours.
There's this wonderful technology, it's called concealed firearms. I don't propose that drunk patrons be allowed to bring them in (although that'd be better than the status quo), but it's really a shame that no one in the staff (save for one guy at the entrance) had a concealed firearm on them. This could be over in minutes with fairly minimal casualties. In fact, had he known he would see resistance there, he would likely have gone elsewhere. Instead the police waited for 3.5 hours (!) before storming the club. That's what they usually do, since they have no legal obligation whatsoever to protect anyone or put themselves in danger (Google "no duty to protect" if you don't believe me).
The right answer to expectations and timelines: fuck off, it will be done when it's done, but we'll do our best. At Google this is handled by setting quarterly goals, and then watching them whoosh by when the quarter ends. Or not, in this regime things often do go faster than expected. The key mechanism that makes it work is the reward structure: Google rewards launches and basically nothing else. Want a bigger bonus? Launch something. Want a promo? Launch something. And so on. And I can personally confirm: you get the behavior you reward, for better or worse. All this daily meeting bullshit would just get in the way of adults doing their work.
Let me first say this: FUCK YOU. Now let's move to the substantive critique of your reply.
OF COURSE you will be "discriminated against" if black youths commit majority of violent crimes even though they're only 16% of all youths. Specifically over 58% of homicides, and over 67% of robberies. Stop wanting to be gangsta. Clean up. Get out of the gang. Acquire some marketable skills. Find a job. Hold down a job. Do your job well and get promoted. Get married. Don't let your kid grow up without a father. It's difficult, but it has to be done in order for for more people (including well-off blacks) to treat young male African-Americans without prejudice.
The old "we are being discriminated against no matter what" shit might have worked before Obama got elected, twice. It doesn't work anymore. Clean up, show up, put in the effort, and you will succeed.
Literally none of them are teenagers. I'm in favor of seeing their mugshots, though, don't get me wrong. Pity this never happens. Democrats or Republicans, they're all owned by Wall Street.
True, but those groups are tiny in comparison, as well as in the amount of damage they cause.
And black males are disproportionately represented in gangs and other criminal statistics. Notice how most of those mugshots are of black men, and pictures of women are for the most part not mugshots.
TensorFlow has a C++ API as well.