you can always seize the infringer's revenue or assets later to make up for the loss of revenue if it turns out he indeed was infringing. That's the point -- just because there's a harm doesn't mean you need to stop it right now.
Not true. The infringer can easily move the money to keep that
from happening. Later the infringer goes bankrupt.
In fact, Novell is now making that point with regard to SCOX.
While SCOX is not making money off of a patent, it does involve
license revenue, and the point remains
that an infringer can get away with it to the point that
there is no money to recover after the fact.
Even though there is evidence to support the missle theory, which would mean that an ID requirement would have no bearing on catching the launchers of the missle.
No, it doesn't really work.
Here's the summary:
Women that look hot are hot to trot.
I knew it was just a matter of time.
It's a story that was accidently leaked 80 days early.
With a cup of water.
Not true. The infringer can easily move the money to keep that from happening. Later the infringer goes bankrupt.
In fact, Novell is now making that point with regard to SCOX. While SCOX is not making money off of a patent, it does involve license revenue, and the point remains that an infringer can get away with it to the point that there is no money to recover after the fact.
Lay got lucky not having to face jail time.
Even though there is evidence to support the missle
theory, which would mean that an ID requirement would
have no bearing on catching the launchers of the missle.
Cash.
So, they still have .3030303030... of a developer left then.
If the 'security software' provided by her ISP made
the computer slow to a crawl, I'd say that the
'security software' was actually malware/spyware.
A few days?
Obviously he is not writing these signing statements.
The proof is the use of the word 'exigent'.
He has no idea what that means, and he certainly
would have misspelled it.
For Vista to be take off support before the rovers die.
Tuesdays, every week for Vista, once a month for the rovers
sounds about right.
No, but they have the same boss.
Because Linux will not be rammed down anyone's throats.
Furthermore, people have an option, they could get a Mac.
In this case, dupes are a good thing.
This attack on your freedoms needs to become widely known.
If they dupe this every other day until next June, it is good.
Weird. I can access an exchange server via Mozilla mail.
So, if Thunderbird won't do it, it must be a bug.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.