Snowden said that according to unverified documents seen by the Post, the NSA had been hacking computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland since 2009. None of the documents revealed any information about Chinese military systems, he said.
One of the targets in the SAR, according to Snowden, was Chinese University and public officials, businesses and students in the city. The documents also point to hacking activity by the NSA against mainland targets.
Snowden believed there had been more than 61,000 NSA hacking operations globally, with hundreds of targets in Hong Kong and on the mainland.
“We hack network backbones – like huge internet routers, basically – that give us access to the communications of hundreds of thousands of computers without having to hack every single one,” he said.
That is way more than "doing it to foil terrorist attacks".
They are storing the data. It is that they are just
not intentionally looking at all of it. When they have
a target, then they do the google on the data.
There is too much data to look at all of it every day.
There was no price uncertainty whatsoever. Only the clueless
thought it would go up. The naked short selling led to the problems.
If the IPO had started around $28, there would not have been a problem.
But, $38 was way too much, and it was an obvious short play before it
started. When most of the trades where shorts, and there were few buyers,
hell yeah, you are not going to get confirmation of a short sale until some
buyer comes in, otherwise they would all be naked short sales.
Think secure boot. If the 'bridge chip' has a key, that only the trusted driver can supply,
then with UEFI and "secure boot", they
have just locked down the machine to windows only.
Actually, the fascists really don't give a damn about any efficiency as long
as they can run the world.
The MIC creates "programs" (Bush mentioned that many times), which in
reality are the creation of haystacks so that taxpayer money can be spent
on these MIC "programs" looking for the needles in the created haystacks that
contain no needles. But the MIC gets the money anyway. And since there
are no needles in the fabricated haystacks, (damn, that "program" was not
funded enough, we need more money, we know there are needles there, we
just did not have enough funds to do the proper searches), they create more haystacks,
and convince the Congress that more money must be spent chasing the invisible
non-existent bogeyman that the MIC has created.
You are hell-bent on this story. You are also full of crap.
There is no implicit contract involved here. There is no transaction.
There are no goods or services being purchased that can be returned
or be made good if there is a defect. To wit:
I see a slot machine. It has a slot that accepts tokens, and in
return for accepting that token, some wheels may rotate and some
lights may flash, and noise, oh boy, plenty of noise I hear.
I.E., it is a shiny object that provides entertainment if you find
that rotating wheel, flashing lights, and noise is entertainment.
Rumor has it, that said machine sometimes also regurgitates stuff
that may have value, and one can pocket said regurgitation.
I put a token into this shiny object that may regurgitate stuff.
At this point, I have a decision to make. Do I really want to see
this "entertainment". Let's say I do, because I am curious.
Now, I have another decision to make. Do I pull the handle or do
I press the button. Decision, decisions. Oh, wait, maybe I decide
that I am not curious after all, and maybe I want to hit the payout
button and get my token back. Man, this is all so fucking confusing.
No wonder they call slots a skill game.
Now, let's say I decide that I am going to push the button, and just
as I do, I get distracted, and have to turn away. When I turn back
to the shiny machine, there is no credit, no regurgitation to be found.
Tell me, how do I know that the shiny machine did not malfunction??
I want my token back. Yeah, if I bitch enough and make a scene,
the house will give me my token back, and also tell me to hit the road.
But, how do I know the machine is working properly, as intended,
as programmed?
There is abolutely no way.
And if the customer can NOT know that there is no malfunction, there
can not be any implicit contract because there are no goods that could
be returned or a service that can be corrected.
But, you in the Gambling Industry don't really care, because there is
a sucker born every minute.
Exactly. They should pay him that much for finding the bug,
as obviously they could have lost that much or more if not found.
In fact, they may have already lost more than that because other
people may have found it also, but they just did not play enough
to make it obvious.
There is plenty of evidence that evolution does occur over time,
but that does not prove that you exist because of evolution.
You may just be part of a herd, ready to be harvested someday.
A herd that has expanded so much that it is now having problems
with sustaining itself.
But just because they want to push Intelligent Design, does not
neccessarily mean what they have convinced themselves it means.
The Intelligent Designer (to some their $DEITY), may in fact be
extremely intelligent, so intelligent in fact that those designers
had to make you intelligent enough to grow the herd, but not
too intelligent as to question why you are following a genetic program,
and naively fulfilling the Intelligent Designers evil goals.
Slashdot Mirror
Because if he is telling a lie, then he is not revealing classified info.
Where else can the employees use their coupons for their dog food?
No, you have two senators right now. William "Mo" Cowan may be an interim senator, but he is still a senator for at least 12 more days.
Every three months they have to renew the warrants. That is 'hard work'. Ask GWB.
That is way more than "doing it to foil terrorist attacks".
He has not announced that he will be running for Vice President yet.
They are storing the data. It is that they are just not intentionally looking at all of it. When they have a target, then they do the google on the data. There is too much data to look at all of it every day.
So, he was lying when he said the reports are inaccurate. That makes everything as clear as mud.
Doesn't the NSA farm that that that out to the Department of Redundancy Department?
Exponents must be greater than 2.
Fermat was completely correct. This is a superset problem.
Who do *you* really believe was behind 9-11?
Hint: It was not OBL.
Otherwise, your point is spot on.
There was no price uncertainty whatsoever. Only the clueless thought it would go up. The naked short selling led to the problems. If the IPO had started around $28, there would not have been a problem. But, $38 was way too much, and it was an obvious short play before it started. When most of the trades where shorts, and there were few buyers, hell yeah, you are not going to get confirmation of a short sale until some buyer comes in, otherwise they would all be naked short sales.
And still have not determined it's state.
Unless the eavesdropper is Rocky or Bullwinkle.
Think secure boot. If the 'bridge chip' has a key, that only the trusted driver can supply, then with UEFI and "secure boot", they have just locked down the machine to windows only.
Circular edges are precipitate.
The MIC creates "programs" (Bush mentioned that many times), which in reality are the creation of haystacks so that taxpayer money can be spent on these MIC "programs" looking for the needles in the created haystacks that contain no needles. But the MIC gets the money anyway. And since there are no needles in the fabricated haystacks, (damn, that "program" was not funded enough, we need more money, we know there are needles there, we just did not have enough funds to do the proper searches), they create more haystacks, and convince the Congress that more money must be spent chasing the invisible non-existent bogeyman that the MIC has created.
You are hell-bent on this story. You are also full of crap. There is no implicit contract involved here. There is no transaction. There are no goods or services being purchased that can be returned or be made good if there is a defect. To wit: I see a slot machine. It has a slot that accepts tokens, and in return for accepting that token, some wheels may rotate and some lights may flash, and noise, oh boy, plenty of noise I hear. I.E., it is a shiny object that provides entertainment if you find that rotating wheel, flashing lights, and noise is entertainment. Rumor has it, that said machine sometimes also regurgitates stuff that may have value, and one can pocket said regurgitation. I put a token into this shiny object that may regurgitate stuff. At this point, I have a decision to make. Do I really want to see this "entertainment". Let's say I do, because I am curious. Now, I have another decision to make. Do I pull the handle or do I press the button. Decision, decisions. Oh, wait, maybe I decide that I am not curious after all, and maybe I want to hit the payout button and get my token back. Man, this is all so fucking confusing. No wonder they call slots a skill game. Now, let's say I decide that I am going to push the button, and just as I do, I get distracted, and have to turn away. When I turn back to the shiny machine, there is no credit, no regurgitation to be found. Tell me, how do I know that the shiny machine did not malfunction?? I want my token back. Yeah, if I bitch enough and make a scene, the house will give me my token back, and also tell me to hit the road. But, how do I know the machine is working properly, as intended, as programmed? There is abolutely no way. And if the customer can NOT know that there is no malfunction, there can not be any implicit contract because there are no goods that could be returned or a service that can be corrected. But, you in the Gambling Industry don't really care, because there is a sucker born every minute.
Well, they can't call themselves the "Gambling Industry", because they are not gambling at all, they know they will make a profit.
Exactly. They should pay him that much for finding the bug, as obviously they could have lost that much or more if not found. In fact, they may have already lost more than that because other people may have found it also, but they just did not play enough to make it obvious.
This is a waste of time, and another vector for ad-servers to throw malicious javascript and flash attacks at you.
When they had their accident above ground.
There is plenty of evidence that evolution does occur over time, but that does not prove that you exist because of evolution. You may just be part of a herd, ready to be harvested someday. A herd that has expanded so much that it is now having problems with sustaining itself. But just because they want to push Intelligent Design, does not neccessarily mean what they have convinced themselves it means. The Intelligent Designer (to some their $DEITY), may in fact be extremely intelligent, so intelligent in fact that those designers had to make you intelligent enough to grow the herd, but not too intelligent as to question why you are following a genetic program, and naively fulfilling the Intelligent Designers evil goals.