The most cost effective solution would probably be to but small print servers. Linksys makes cheap ones that are just little boxes that have a ethernet port on one side and a printer port on the other for like 75 bucks. If you want one that supports several printers at the same time,and has a good amount of memory HP sells em too, a bit more expensive though. Personally the Linksys ones have worked just fine for me.
It exist, used to come with some expensive unix commerical solutions. Very specialised for the specific unix, and you can't get it anywere else. I don't think any of the new version of IE from the last 2 years are available for IE, though, but I'm not absolutly sure about that.
My NS 4.78 renders it exactly the way it should.
It pops open a dialog saying save as or open in mozilla. (cause its an.xml document, which NS4.x doesn't know)
na most programs can handle switches with - prefix about anywhere including rm. Anyways in front it more proper.
So cd/home/mozilla
rm -rf/home/mozilla/*
..... rest of stuff
IT doesn't but you do get a savings in memory as each tab eats less memory then a entire new window. And the switching happends faster. And if you use hotkeys for switching you can switch between relavent pages which you put in tabs in one window. As opposed to switching between all your application.
Re:Older version
on
Netscape 6.2
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Actually the sensable thing is rm/home/mozilla/* -rf
easy simple no question about what it will do.
well link tags are commonly used to add style sheets. But this is not what we are talking about. The only real way to explain it is to get a new nightly (or 0.9.5) of mozilla, user the view menu select show/hide --> site navigation bar.
And select only as needed.
Then go to something like http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Outlook-to-Unix -Mailbox-2.html and check out the bar that appears with the next previous buttons.
Re:Spell Checker?
on
Netscape 6.2
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Well it comes automatically in 6.2 if you want to add it to mozilla you goto the 6.2 download directory goto xpi directory then get spellcheck.xpi it should install automatically. Note: it is only garenteed to work netscape 6.2 infact I just tested it an it seems as though the UI for the spellchecker did not get added. So guess your out of luck.
Actually currently its only for their Mobile Internet Toolkit, which is a programming environment for Internet Solutions, includig many libraries. That state that they worry that the GPL will retroactivly force MS to GPL those libraries permanently. If they are allowed to work together. Which is completly and total horeshit.
The license has to following bits
By way of example but not limitation of the foregoing, Recipient shall not distribute the Software, in whole or in part, in conjunction with any Publicly Available Software. "Publicly Available Software" means each of (i) any software that contains, or is derived in any manner (in whole or in part) from, any software that is distributed as free software, open source software (e.g. Linux) or similar licensing or distribution models; and (ii) any software that requires as a condition of use, modification and/or distribution of such software that other software distributed with such software (A) be disclosed or distributed in source code form; (B) be licensed for the purpose of making derivative works; or (C) be redistributable at no charge. Publicly Available Software includes, without limitation, software licensed or distributed under any of the following licenses or distribution models, or licenses or distribution models similar to any of the following: (A) GNU's General Public License (GPL) or Lesser/Library GPL (LGPL), (B) The Artistic License (e.g., PERL), (C) the Mozilla Public License, (D) the Netscape Public License, (E) the Sun Community Source License (SCSL), and (F) the Sun Industry Standards License (SISL).
Well I'm hoping that we will have the option of having a backend, like outlook does. Without the proprietary stuff. And without the limits. As there are many things that outlook could do via imap but it refuses to because it wants you to buy their server.
No, it won't. Though it will support ical downloads which will allow to you to download and endless amounts of holidays that are preprogrammed. Unfortionaltly there isn't an easy mathematical way to compute all future solar calendar events. So these have to be added manually (via ical, but not via an ical calculation)
I have to point out, that sourceforge carries huge amounts of uncreated programs. Freshmeat deals exculsivly in programs that actually have working code you can use. Try and find a program on freshmeat that doesn't have a stable version available. Now try and find a program that does have a stable version available in sourceforge. You can't find either can you?
(JK about the second part, but I really wish sourceforge out have seperate sections for projects with stable branches, and ones without, but then again, thats what freshmeat is for)
Well I'm for the right or anybody to put any license they want on anything they create (as long as it's understood before hand, and you are clear about what the license does before the person obtains the software.)
That is the words of Richard Stallman. He's an extremist and doesn't represent the views of the average Open Source programmer. Actually yes, used to be able to use MS's libraries in GPL'd programs, because MS didn't state how the programs had to be licences. NOW there is a specific clause MS added to the libraries stating that they can NOT be used in GPL'd or other "viral" programs. So which is limiting your freedom. (Yes I agree that GPL'd libraries do limit your freedom, but there is always the LGPL, and I believe the programmer of any program OR library has the RIGHT to license his/her code however they wish.) And I believe MS does also, though as a monopoly, they do have a bigger civic responsibility to see that they are not shutting out potential compitition. Just a legallity though.
I know your just trying to stir up people. But disagrements are what democracy is all about. If everyone in leadership agrees we basically end up with a tynany. But I guess thats what you want:)
Re:SuSE has done this for a while...
on
Debian On DVD
·
· Score: 2
I personally havn't installed Debian in a long time, but I'm pretty sure it includes network installs. So Put the DVD in one computer then share it via ftp. You still need to make bootdisk of course, but no biggie.
Oh yea, and in no way are you ever required to use GPL libraries. Thats your choice, if you choose to use them you know the limitations. Like if I choose to use MS's libraries I know I can't use them for GPL'd programs.
Most libraries are LGPL, which allows you to use it pretty much however you want (except for redistributing the libraries themselves, then it works much like the GPL)
Well I like to take a quick gander at all the news headline sites. including msn.com just to see if they are reporting and odd stories that I havn't seen elsewhere. Its rare for msn.com to report anything that msnbc.com isn't. But it happends.
Attention: Web Browser Upgrade Required to View MSN.com
If you are seeing this page, we have detected that the browser that you are using will not render MSN.com correctly. Additionally, you'll see the most advanced functionality of MSN.com only with the latest version of Microsoft Internet Explorer or MSN Explorer. If you wish to visit MSN.com, please select the appropriate download link below.
* Internet Explorer for Windows
* Internet Explorer for Macintosh
* MSN Explorer for Windows
But that hallarious that your getting rendering problems? Are you running with some special setting? Mac?
Well they probably hardly know or care about Konqueror. From what I've read the page specifically blocks Opera and Mozilla. If you change Opera to report it as Ophra for example. It will let it go through. So its not a block everthing but IE scheme. Its a lets not let Opera or mozilla in scheme, which I think is worse as its specifically discriminating. And not by quality either as Opera and Mozilla are the 2 non IE browser that most likly will render msn.com best.
Slashdot Mirror
Do you recommend and good thermal compounds I havn't been able to find anything good? where to buy?
The most cost effective solution would probably be to but small print servers. Linksys makes cheap ones that are just little boxes that have a ethernet port on one side and a printer port on the other for like 75 bucks. If you want one that supports several printers at the same time,and has a good amount of memory HP sells em too, a bit more expensive though. Personally the Linksys ones have worked just fine for me.
It exist, used to come with some expensive unix commerical solutions. Very specialised for the specific unix, and you can't get it anywere else. I don't think any of the new version of IE from the last 2 years are available for IE, though, but I'm not absolutly sure about that.
My NS 4.78 renders it exactly the way it should. .xml document, which NS4.x doesn't know)
It pops open a dialog saying save as or open in mozilla. (cause its an
Where are all the comments? Did everyone just go home? Ok the submission should really have included some more comment provoking remarks. This is sad.
na most programs can handle switches with - prefix about anywhere including rm. Anyways in front it more proper. /home/mozilla
/home/mozilla/*
So cd
rm -rf
..... rest of stuff
IT doesn't but you do get a savings in memory as each tab eats less memory then a entire new window. And the switching happends faster. And if you use hotkeys for switching you can switch between relavent pages which you put in tabs in one window. As opposed to switching between all your application.
Actually the sensable thing is rm /home/mozilla/* -rf
easy simple no question about what it will do.
well link tags are commonly used to add style sheets. But this is not what we are talking about. The only real way to explain it is to get a new nightly (or 0.9.5) of mozilla, user the view menu select show/hide --> site navigation bar.x -Mailbox-2.html
And select only as needed.
Then go to something like http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Outlook-to-Uni
and check out the bar that appears with the next previous buttons.
Well it comes automatically in 6.2 if you want to add it to mozilla you goto the 6.2 download directory goto xpi directory then get spellcheck.xpi it should install automatically. Note: it is only garenteed to work netscape 6.2 infact I just tested it an it seems as though the UI for the spellchecker did not get added. So guess your out of luck.
Actually currently its only for their Mobile Internet Toolkit, which is a programming environment for Internet Solutions, includig many libraries. That state that they worry that the GPL will retroactivly force MS to GPL those libraries permanently. If they are allowed to work together. Which is completly and total horeshit.
The license has to following bits
By way of example but not limitation of the foregoing, Recipient shall not distribute the Software, in whole or in part, in conjunction with any Publicly Available Software. "Publicly Available Software" means each of (i) any software that contains, or is derived in any manner (in whole or in part) from, any software that is distributed as free software, open source software (e.g. Linux) or similar licensing or distribution models; and (ii) any software that requires as a condition of use, modification and/or distribution of such software that other software distributed with such software (A) be disclosed or distributed in source code form; (B) be licensed for the purpose of making derivative works; or (C) be redistributable at no charge. Publicly Available Software includes, without limitation, software licensed or distributed under any of the following licenses or distribution models, or licenses or distribution models similar to any of the following: (A) GNU's General Public License (GPL) or Lesser/Library GPL (LGPL), (B) The Artistic License (e.g., PERL), (C) the Mozilla Public License, (D) the Netscape Public License, (E) the Sun Community Source License (SCSL), and (F) the Sun Industry Standards License (SISL).
Well I'm hoping that we will have the option of having a backend, like outlook does. Without the proprietary stuff. And without the limits. As there are many things that outlook could do via imap but it refuses to because it wants you to buy their server.
No, it won't. Though it will support ical downloads which will allow to you to download and endless amounts of holidays that are preprogrammed. Unfortionaltly there isn't an easy mathematical way to compute all future solar calendar events. So these have to be added manually (via ical, but not via an ical calculation)
I have to point out, that sourceforge carries huge amounts of uncreated programs. Freshmeat deals exculsivly in programs that actually have working code you can use. Try and find a program on freshmeat that doesn't have a stable version available. Now try and find a program that does have a stable version available in sourceforge. You can't find either can you?
(JK about the second part, but I really wish sourceforge out have seperate sections for projects with stable branches, and ones without, but then again, thats what freshmeat is for)
Well I'm for the right or anybody to put any license they want on anything they create (as long as it's understood before hand, and you are clear about what the license does before the person obtains the software.)
That is the words of Richard Stallman. He's an extremist and doesn't represent the views of the average Open Source programmer. Actually yes, used to be able to use MS's libraries in GPL'd programs, because MS didn't state how the programs had to be licences. NOW there is a specific clause MS added to the libraries stating that they can NOT be used in GPL'd or other "viral" programs. So which is limiting your freedom. (Yes I agree that GPL'd libraries do limit your freedom, but there is always the LGPL, and I believe the programmer of any program OR library has the RIGHT to license his/her code however they wish.) And I believe MS does also, though as a monopoly, they do have a bigger civic responsibility to see that they are not shutting out potential compitition. Just a legallity though.
I know your just trying to stir up people. But disagrements are what democracy is all about. If everyone in leadership agrees we basically end up with a tynany. But I guess thats what you want :)
I personally havn't installed Debian in a long time, but I'm pretty sure it includes network installs. So Put the DVD in one computer then share it via ftp. You still need to make bootdisk of course, but no biggie.
Oh yea, and in no way are you ever required to use GPL libraries. Thats your choice, if you choose to use them you know the limitations. Like if I choose to use MS's libraries I know I can't use them for GPL'd programs.
Most libraries are LGPL, which allows you to use it pretty much however you want (except for redistributing the libraries themselves, then it works much like the GPL)
Yawn. once again I ask again. What right as a developer has been removed from you, when comparing GPL'd software to copywritted proprietary software?
Well I like to take a quick gander at all the news headline sites. including msn.com just to see if they are reporting and odd stories that I havn't seen elsewhere. Its rare for msn.com to report anything that msnbc.com isn't. But it happends.
No we are seeing text that tells us
Attention: Web Browser Upgrade Required to View MSN.com
If you are seeing this page, we have detected that the browser that you are using will not render MSN.com correctly. Additionally, you'll see the most advanced functionality of MSN.com only with the latest version of Microsoft Internet Explorer or MSN Explorer. If you wish to visit MSN.com, please select the appropriate download link below.
* Internet Explorer for Windows
* Internet Explorer for Macintosh
* MSN Explorer for Windows
But that hallarious that your getting rendering problems? Are you running with some special setting? Mac?
Well they probably hardly know or care about Konqueror. From what I've read the page specifically blocks Opera and Mozilla. If you change Opera to report it as Ophra for example. It will let it go through. So its not a block everthing but IE scheme. Its a lets not let Opera or mozilla in scheme, which I think is worse as its specifically discriminating. And not by quality either as Opera and Mozilla are the 2 non IE browser that most likly will render msn.com best.
I did not know that, thank you :)
Downloading susi as I speak!