However, all the Wikipedia text and many of the images are available under GNU Free Documentation License. If someone thinks they have a better way of operating, they can grab a copy of the current Wikipedia and go fork it.
The jury wasn't even told that Scientology was involved. Or that person sitting beside the assistant DA during the trial was the lawyer for Scientology (and former Gambino mafia lawyer).
If you post about Scientology on your MySpace, it'll be deleted. It seems they are smurfing complaints about anything critical of Scientology to get it removed as "hate crimes". Check out a message that one sent out, especially the part about not reading the pages that they should complain about.
I think that they're more than a whisker over the libel line in places.
The main reason that the site owners haven't been sued is (a) it's such a good example of CoS's Fair Game policy, (b) it's unclear who would step up to the bat as the owners of the site. Either a sock-puppet proxy with few assets (Joel Phillips and the "Scientology Parishioners Committee) or the full legal Brute Squad of Scientology who would drag the case out for twenty years and as much legal cost and sub-legal harrassment as possible.
They're pretty big of illegally attacking critics too. Check Operation Freakout where they fabricated evidence that "Paulette Cooper was guilty of issuing bomb threats against the Church, Henry Kissinger, Arab nations, and a laundromat. The seized documents were used to prosecute and convict Scientology officials in 1979."
Fabricated bomb threats... Sounds kind of familiar...
Slashdot Mirror
No, a Ninja is nothing like a Hayabusa, different makes too.
Ninja
See?Hayabusa
Is it possible that he's connected with the mooninite terrorists? (Everyone knows those moon people stick together!)
That's traditional! Compuserve and the Source would talk about their millions of users too, but never mention their churn rate.
So, what kind of voting machines do they have?
But will the EU ban dupes as well? Oh noes!!1!
"If it has hit points, it can die!"
Yes, at last!
I wonder how many young men have run into something else while suffering from "target fixation"?
Add in a few karma-based "spells", and it'd be like Pyroto Mountain all over again.
It only seems like 20 years ago. In many ways, Clippy (and other MS Agents) are the last remaining pieces of "Bob Technology".
The death was not too quick or easy.
There's plenty of Wiki rules lawyers already, and now you want to give them a scoring system?
However, all the Wikipedia text and many of the images are available under GNU Free Documentation License. If someone thinks they have a better way of operating, they can grab a copy of the current Wikipedia and go fork it.
The jury wasn't even told that Scientology was involved. Or that person sitting beside the assistant DA during the trial was the lawyer for Scientology (and former Gambino mafia lawyer).
If you post about Scientology on your MySpace, it'll be deleted. It seems they are smurfing complaints about anything critical of Scientology to get it removed as "hate crimes". Check out a message that one sent out, especially the part about not reading the pages that they should complain about.
Heh, wouldn't the Witness Protection program involve keeping a low profile, not drawing attention to yourself or speaking out?
You don't know the history of Keith like I do... :p
You mean a GNU/Religion?
Scientology didn't even do their standard Fair Game defamation page on Stan, I'm shocked!
Odd thing about that jury, since the case, no one has been able to verify that these people actually exist.
I think that they're more than a whisker over the libel line in places.
The main reason that the site owners haven't been sued is (a) it's such a good example of CoS's Fair Game policy, (b) it's unclear who would step up to the bat as the owners of the site. Either a sock-puppet proxy with few assets (Joel Phillips and the "Scientology Parishioners Committee) or the full legal Brute Squad of Scientology who would drag the case out for twenty years and as much legal cost and sub-legal harrassment as possible.
They're pretty big of illegally attacking critics too. Check Operation Freakout where they fabricated evidence that "Paulette Cooper was guilty of issuing bomb threats against the Church, Henry Kissinger, Arab nations, and a laundromat. The seized documents were used to prosecute and convict Scientology officials in 1979."
Fabricated bomb threats... Sounds kind of familiar...Maybe Prester John was really in China? (Not unless he actually ended up in Utah or some other wacky idea...)