Slashdot Mirror


John Edwards' Campaign Enters Second Life

politics 2.0 writes "It may not be an official effort — yet — but thanks to a grass-roots effort, John Edwards has become the first presidential candidate to set-up-shop in Second Life. Jerimee Richir, whose avatar is called Jose Rote, paid-for and developed Edwards' virtual headquarters, and, on a voluntary basis, is managing the in-world campaign. Considering that Second Life's user numbers are much smaller than other social networks, such as MySpace and Facebook — aside from generating press coverage — will campaigning in Second Life actually win many votes? Rote says yes, and that 'Second Life users are a unique audience, in that, they are first adopters. It is a smaller community, but I would argue it is a more influential community.'"

151 comments

  1. The Next VRML by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 5, Funny

    From TFS:

    [W]ill campaigning in Second Life actually win many votes?

    You know, I really liked John Edwards; granted, he pulled the daddy worked 36 years in NC textile thing one too many times, but his daughter is hot.

    As far as Second Life goes: you guys are just the next VRML; deal with it.

    1. Re:The Next VRML by LinuxGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mr. Edwards gained quite a reputation both in NC and nation wide as an extremely aggressive attorney. Living in NC for most of my life, I got to see many effects of his record setting medical settlements and jury awards on both the patients and doctors. If he can do the same things for Second Life, then it probably won't last much longer... :~}

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:The Next VRML by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      but his daughter is hot.


            Ewww. We obviously have different tastes in women. She could use some surgery on her chin...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:The Next VRML by Anthracks · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hot compared to who? Tubgirl? I don't have anything to go on except that pic at the top of the page you linked, but yowza, that's not my idea of "total babe".

      --
      Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
    4. Re:The Next VRML by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ewww. We obviously have different tastes in women. She could use some surgery on her chin...

      Dude, she got that chin from Bill Clinton! Maybe they were playing baseball or something, I seem to recall something about being hit in the face with too many balls.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:The Next VRML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...he pulled the daddy worked 36 years in NC textile thing one too many times, but his daughter is hot.

      Except that she looks like John Edwards with a wig. But maybe for some people that's a turn-on.

    6. Re:The Next VRML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I got to see many effects of his record setting medical settlements and jury awards on both the patients and doctors."

      Could you elaborate please?

    7. Re:The Next VRML by JohnnyRnR · · Score: 1

      "Uphill in the snow" stories aside I think that the religious blogger fiasco does a lot more to ruin his credibility. His staff didn't understand the public eye process enough to properly vet a new staff member. Bill O'Reilly's people did some good work on this one; bigots of any persuasion should be exposed.

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,251906,00.html [Fox News]
      http://youtube.com/watch?v=GkEZVGsdrw8 [YouTube]

    8. Re:The Next VRML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent should be modded insightful.

    9. Re:The Next VRML by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      Read the first link in my OP and you won't have to take my word for anything.

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  2. Cool by mfh · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think this guy should build a new America in Second Life and sell it to the Chinese government for enough money to fix the war problem.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  3. Is Edwards concerned about the two Second Life's? by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2, Funny

    The haves in the Second Life economy and the have nots?

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  4. *rolls eyes* by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rote says yes, and that 'Second Life users are a unique audience, in that, they are first adopters. It is a smaller community, but I would argue it is a more influential community.'

    Yeeesh! Smug SL user & lame* presidential candidate stories rolled into one! Thanks slashdot :-)

    Second life is great to show your "internet savvy", coz the mainstream press (newsites, tv, legacy print, etc) can report on your 'internet presence' with impressive pics of a 3d world.

    Second life is not great for the direct influence it has on the American public.

    *the story, not the candidate, dunno about him.

    PS. A comment on the linked article said Obama also had a SL presence. But with no backing evidence. Anyone on SL want to confirm/deny this for us?

    PPS. Did anyone else think the photo of the author of the linked article looked 'shopped?

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:*rolls eyes* by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      PPS. Did anyone else think the photo of the author of the linked article looked 'shopped?

      No. Stephen Hawking's love child, perhaps, but not 'shopped.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:*rolls eyes* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the guy in the photo, and I am a wheelchair user but I look *nothing* like Hawking.

  5. Right... by Erwos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Second Life campaign team says Second Life is important to campaign. Who could have predicted such an outcome?

    This sounds remarkably like a Second Lifer who's gotten an inflated idea of how important their alternate reality is, asked the campaign team for permission, and then made something. The fact that the campaign itself doesn't seem to be investing money in this is telling as to how much _they_ think this is going to help. That's not to say an Internet presence isn't important, of course - but this is just a little too niche to matter.

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    1. Re:Right... by inviolet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Indeed. Observe the Second Life guy's comment:

      Rote says yes, and that 'Second Life users are a unique audience, in that, they are first adopters. It is a smaller community, but I would argue it is a more influential community.'"

      Whenever anyone says "I would argue...", note that they have not actually said "I am now arguing...".

      In fact the phrase "I would argue" serves the same purpose as 'really', 'great', and 'literally': it is a flag to warn us that the speaker doesn't fully believe what he or she is saying.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    2. Re:Right... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Or, it could mean "if this point were up for debate, I would argue X... but it is not up for debate, so I won't be arguing."

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  6. Oh well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose President of a VRML is better than nothing.
    Oh wait....

  7. Don't laugh - second lifers *are* influential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    They influenced me to stay the hell away from second life.

    (Google "second life safari" somethingawful if you want to see what I mean)

  8. Hillary next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNet headline: Tonight while giving a political speech on a Second Life server the charactr Pillory Clit was attacked by wave after wave flying dildos who screamed "NO" as they approached her.

  9. For the benefit of those outside of the USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is not the "Biggest Douche in the Universe" John Edwards, but rather the relatively-unknown outside the USA political candidate for President John Edwards.

    1. Re:For the benefit of those outside of the USA... by randomaxe · · Score: 1

      Hey, cut the guy some slack. He may not have been featured on South Park, but he's still a giant fscking douche.

    2. Re:For the benefit of those outside of the USA... by toddhisattva · · Score: 1

      This is not the "Biggest Douche in the Universe" John Edwards, but rather the relatively-unknown outside the USA political candidate for President John Edwards.
      It is the same person: he talks to the dead for money.

      (Same person, different body)
    3. Re:For the benefit of those outside of the USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is not the "Biggest Douche in the Universe" John Edwards, but rather the relatively-unknown outside the USA political candidate for President John Edwards.

      It is the same person: he talks to the dead for money."

      Actually, I think he did pull something like that - pretending in court to channel a dead girl to sob the jury into a huge award against some company. A tobacco company?

  10. Good thing they are not a company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Good thing they are not a company.

    Because then it would be corporate-America astroturfing.

  11. Finally Crossed Over? by Hodr · · Score: 1

    Its it bad that the first thing I thought of after having read that title was that the sci-fi guy would finally have to answer to all those angry spirits who watched him bilk their relatives on his cheasy tv show?

  12. your virtual president .. by rs232 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wouldn't it be great if they moved wars to Second Life also. Wait isn't that an episode of Startrek.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:your virtual president .. by ObiWanStevobi · · Score: 1

      Ya, but if I remember right, you still had to kill yourself in the disintegration chamber if the computer said you died in it's war simulation. So I don't think that would work out too well.

    2. Re:your virtual president .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

      "you still had to kill yourself in the disintegration chamber"

      Only if you don't posess the cheat codes, dude. I wonder will his first virtual town hall meeting be interrupted by flying penii or be attended by this constituent.

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
  13. USA isn't the whole world, you know... by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This guy may be the first AMERICAN presidential candidate on second life, but we already have a few french presidential candidates there for a couple of mounthes now.

    1. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if France has figured out a way to surrender in Second Life yet.

    2. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wonder if France has figured out a way to surrender in Second Life yet.

            Just as soon as the Americans manage to figure out how to lose yet another war to a bunch of peasants there.

            Love,

            A French guy.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by VJ42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if France has figured out a way to surrender in Second Life yet. Are you English? If not cease and desist from French bashing. The English peoples claim sole rights to that activity (after we spent the best part of a millennium at war with them, we deserve it), all other peoples are prohibited and licences are no longer granted since the whole "freedom fries" fiasco proved that no one else can do the job properly. Other prohibited activities reserved for the English and\or British are winding up the Germans over the war and\or football.
      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    4. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Like the French did in Vietnam? Or like the French did in the Ivory Coast? Or like the French did in Algeria? Those are some great examples!

    5. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by bytesex · · Score: 1

      I disagree, governor. You can have your frogs and boil 'em in warm beer for all you like (and serve them with mint-sauce), but bashing Germans over football is a national pastime only reserved for the Dutch. And we're closer too, so there !

      Sincerely,

      A Cloggie.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    6. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by ab762 · · Score: 1
      The classic Brit position:

      "We shouldn't be upset when the Germans beat us at our national sport. After all we beat them at theirs twice in the twentieth century."
    7. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      I knew there was a reason we love the Scotish so much.

    8. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      So what's the Dutch equivalent of the classic English football chant of "two world wars and one world cup"?

      Actually that's a totally pointless question as I don't understand Dutch, so I think we may have to grant you an unrestricted licence on annoying the Germans over football. I'll trade it for your sane drugs laws.

      To be fair we love it when anyone beats the Germans, so I think there might be grounds for some sort of copyleft licence.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    9. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by sheldon · · Score: 1

      This guy may be the first AMERICAN presidential candidate on second life, but we already have a few french presidential candidates there for a couple of mounthes now.


      Oh hell, we've had a French President for the past six years.

    10. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Uh, when did the French surrender in the Côte d'Ivoire? I remember them destroying the entire Ivoirian air force, but not surrendering to anyone.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    11. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by teal_ · · Score: 1

      I wonder if France has figured out a way to surrender in Second Life yet.

      Sigh. I am sick and tired of this kind of dumb crack about the French. Let's go over some facts:
        - Napoleonic France damn near ruled Europe until they tried to conquer Russia and got stuck in the winter (a mistake that Hitler repeated)
        - France was a crucial partner in the US revolutionary war. Without the help of France, the U.S. would still be a British colony (or a member of the commonwealth, like Canada)
        - France suffered huge losses against a warmongering Germany, whom they shared a border with. The British would have fallen too had they shared a border. I am a proud frog myself, and my grandfather's face was blown off during the second world war, he was a "sans-gueule" (one without a face.) Kind of like this poor guy. Believe me, they didn't just give up without a fight.
        - In southeast Asia, yea well the U.S. didn't seem to do much better now did they.

      So please stop these ignorant jokes about the French. There's nothing funny about them, and they're based on a false premise which has spread like a virus over the years. Parroting them is just dumb. Thank you.

    12. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy may be the first AMERICAN presidential candidate on second life, but we already have a few french presidential candidates there for a couple of mounthes now.

      Uh, so what? Are French presidents looking for new places they can surrender to?

    13. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, you burger-eating invasion monkey!

    14. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by rlp · · Score: 0

      > winding up the Germans over the war and\or football.

      You mean SOCCER. I'll never understand how anyone can get excited about a game that goes on and on and ends with a score of Zero To One.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    15. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soo...

      How many jews did the Brits actually kill?

    16. Re:USA isn't the whole world, you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have not watched cricket! A game that can be played for 5 days and end in a draw!!

  14. Erm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it'll a great-idea-in-practice, but i don't see why people would be interested in such things while playing-a-game.
     
    Btw, I'm loving the latest-cool-punctuation-thing, but does it belong on the Slashdot front page?

  15. Second life is influential? Its a scam! by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Informative

    "It is a smaller community, but I would argue it is a more influential community"

    Second Life is a ponzi scheme.

    http://randolfe.typepad.com/randolfe/2007/01/secon dlife_revo.html
    http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/24/ 1319236

    1. Re:Second life is influential? Its a scam! by vadim_t · · Score: 3, Informative

      That article made no sense at all.

      (typing from memory, so I might get details wrong) Economist goes into SL, tries to earn cash from their internal currency which is *controlled by Linden Lab*, fails, and declares SL a scam.

      There's one important detail he missed here: LL controls the currency, and buys and sells as required to maintain a stable value. That means that after the percentage LL takes for buying/selling, the amount you can earn from simple buying/selling of currency is very little, if anything at all. No surpsise that he failed. But then, since when "making money in SL" was supposed to be done like in a stock market?

      SL has a services based economy. You make/do something for me, I pay you for it. The concept of a ponzi scheme simply doesn't apply in that situation, because a Ponzi scheme is an investment scam, and nobody sane earns money in SL by investing it. What there is is a straightforward system of supply and demand.

    2. Re:Second life is influential? Its a scam! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where there's a Ponzi scam, there's sure to be followers of L. Ron "make money, make more money" Hubbard somewhere close. Cybertown and (sold) NeoPets were scieno-run, so you might want to check the Second Life board of director list.

    3. Re:Second life is influential? Its a scam! by digitig · · Score: 1

      That's not what the first cited article says, and the article that the secong article cites misinterprets the first article in the same way as you do.

      The first article cited says SL is "partially legitimate, partially ponzi" and that "there are plenty of legitimate SecondLife customers who just like to go there to get their kicks, spend a couple dollars, and be on their way". It's only a Ponzi if it's treated as a get-rich-quick scheme, which most users don't seem to be doing. So it's not that SL is a scam, it's that scammers are using SL alongside legitimate users. Gosh, I bet nobody saw that one coming!

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  16. Talking to the dead by barn3y · · Score: 1

    Guess this makes sense - he talks to the dead, might as well get their vote too.

    ...oh, Edward*s*, right.

    1. Re:Talking to the dead by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      You are new here aren't you? The dead have been voting in Chicago since the 1960s. Amazingly they all voted for the same candidate too! Obviously, the dead vote so every campaign needs a "Speaker For The Dead" ;)

  17. First presidential candidate ? by BonoLeBonobo · · Score: 1

    In France we have too candidates who are on second life, the facists and the stupid Ségolène Royal

    --
    Bonjour !
  18. More influential? by 6Yankee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Considering that Second Life's user numbers are much smaller than other social networks, such as MySpace and Facebook -- aside from generating press coverage -- will campaigning in Second Life actually win many votes?

    It's not just about the raw numbers... Myspacers are spotty teenagers who can't vote, and Facebookers are hippie students who won't vote!

    1. Re:More influential? by Valdez · · Score: 1
      Yes, but until you can vote in-world, don't expect a lot of SL'ers to unplug and trudge down to a polling center IRL to tick their ballot.

      What a pain, and I can't even get there in a flying UPS truck. ;)

    2. Re:More influential? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      It's not just about the raw numbers... Myspacers are spotty teenagers who can't vote, and Facebookers are hippie students who won't vote!

      What about WOW then?

    3. Re:More influential? by MajinBlayze · · Score: 1

      Unless the vote occures during a scheduled downtime, they^W we aren't voting either

      --
      "Hate is baggage. Life's too short to be pissed off all the time." Danny Vinyard -American History X
    4. Re:More influential? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Unless the vote occures during a scheduled downtime, they^W we aren't voting either

      Hmm, that could be a future way to stop the other side from making to the poles. Just make sure that you sign up the party that you don't want voting for WOW! On a side note, the company running WOW, could have a "scheduled downtime" only for those of the party it wants to get out to vote. It's a prefect plan... You just need to control Blizzard and have a vague idea of which WOW players that you'd like to be off line for one day. I wonder if Blizzard has ever thought of trying to mold the elections in South Korea to see if this could work for them. I don't know if WOW is as big as StarCraft over there though.

    5. Re:More influential? by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Whereas Second Lifers are likely to build a "polling place" inside the game, cast "votes" in there, then spend the rest of the night doing virtual high-fives about how someday that will be for real.

    6. Re:More influential? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      I can't even get there in a flying UPS truck. ;)

      Well, you could, but you'd need a big square cannon. I was about to say, "and a damned good airbag," but the stated requirement was to "get there". If you want to get there and be able to vote - instead of being able to go home in a bucket - that'll cost extra...

  19. Call when it is official, even then it is old by will_die · · Score: 1

    So someone sets up a political site on second life, quotes himself and gets slashdot to advertise it for him.
    It is not like this is the first time a political party or politician has setup a place on second life, and hey this is not even official.
    Now it would be neat if he duplicated edwards new house

  20. Influential? by toupsie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Influential? Maybe to clueless reporters in desperate need to fill airtime or page space. Second Life has maybe 650,000 real people logging in and tuning out of First Life. I can't think of one concept, product, idea or candidate the Second Life community has successfully promoted to myself, friends or coworkers (a fairly "wired" bunch). If internet savvy Edwards supporters want to assist his campaign, maybe they suggest that John paint a giant campaign sign on his 28,200 sq foot new home on 102 acres in North Carolina so it can be photographed for Google Earth. I am sure one of the two Americas will appreciate that...

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Influential? by encoderer · · Score: 1

      1. I've never been on Second Life, I don't know much about it, I don't care about it, but 650k people isn't exactly tiny. New Hampshire has just over 1MM, for example.

      2. The whole brouhaha about "OMG Edwards Is a Millionaire" is just ridiculously stupid. Here's a clue: Every Presidential Candidate that ran since Truman, or maybe Eisenhower, was a Millionaire. Yes, being a millionaire makes it more likely you'd know the kind of people you need to know to finance a run for President, but also, the type of people that are qualified to be President are smart and savvy enough to make money in our economy.

      3. What you can hope for is that they weren't RAISED a millionaire. That they've lived a life closer to that of an average American. Edwards qualifies here. So does Obama. And actually, we've had a lot of people from humble beginnings make it to the White House in the last century. Including Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, Johnson, Eisenhower, and Truman.

    2. Re:Influential? by Molochi · · Score: 1

      I don't think Nixon was a millionare before he became president, could be wrong though. Nowadays of course, "millionare" just means you can afford to retire like your (well mine anyways) grandparents did.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  21. First *American* presidential candidate by MisterBuggie · · Score: 1

    May I point out that until very recently, the French Front National had an office in SL... It may not be something the French are proud of, but well, Le Pen was there first...

  22. "aside from generating press coverage" by Jon+Luckey · · Score: 3, Funny

    John Edward's Second Life Campaign Headquarters Griefed

    MPGs at 11.

    --
    -- 3 events that reshaped the world in the 20th century: WW1, WW2, and WWW
  23. Pro pron! by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Funny

    By being active on Second Life, mr. Edwards takes a clear and unmistakable stand in favor of pornography and promiscuous sex. He's got my vote!

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  24. Not the first world wide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [...]first presidential candidate to set-up-shop in Second Life.

    perhaps in the US but in France both the favorites candidates for the presidential election have some Avatar and "shops" in SL.
    in Fact if I remember correctly it's the far-right candidate that set-up the first one (LePen).

    PS: and no, thanks God I'm not French

  25. in other SL news by asv108 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Second Life population figures are completely inflated.

    From Valleywag.

    Now that Linden is publishing actual user numbers, we can see that the Residents figure, as expected, is a big overcount over actual people (about 50% inflation, in fact, accounting for over a million ersatz users). Second Life doesn't have two million users. They have had two million users over the life of the service, and they've lost most of them. Of those users, the majority -- something like 5 out of 6 -- bailed in the first month.

    1. Re:in other SL news by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      That's traditional! Compuserve and the Source would talk about their millions of users too, but never mention their churn rate.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  26. Re:Second Life is transitory - global warming by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

    Not sure if you're trolling but, "Are second lifers people who simply don't accept anthropomorphic global warming is a reality? Are they simply fiddling while Rome burns?". That word, I don't think it means what you think it means. You might have meant anthropogenic global warming. To which I suggest you look at the comic rays slashdot article from a few days ago.

    --
    I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  27. Re:Second Life is transitory - global warming by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    global warming and/or peak oil will rapidly deplete our ability to use gas / coal burning power stations for supplying electricity for such entertainment?

          There will ALWAYS be a call for entertainment. What is the difference in energy cost between running a computer to play Second Life, versus watching tv instead? I doubt very much people will sit around and twiddle their thumbs all evening.

    I do not understand why people are using virtual communities like Second life^H^H^H^H^H^H Slashdot.

          Well if the future is so bleak, why don't you spare us all the trouble and shoot yourself now? After all I doubt YOU can change the way everyone depends on oil for everything - so if you can't do anything about it, quit whining about it and go live in a forest. I'm sure there are a lot of things that YOU do that I would consider a waste of time and resources. However it's not up to me to tell you how to live your life.

          You're obviously trolling and deserve what you get.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  28. He just doesn't ring true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'll probably get troll rated by Edwards partisans, but he just doesn't ring true to me. When I examine candidates, I examine their history and look at what they've said in the past and what they say now, to see if there's a thread of consistency and integrity.

    He's against the Iraq war now that it's safe and popular to be, but he not only voted for it, he was actually the Co-Sponsor of Lieberman's bill.
      http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:SJ000 46:@@@P:
    Even Kerry, who caught a lot of flack for voting for the war before voting against it or whatever the mangled soundbite was, had the intelligence to not Co-Sponsor the war. But Edwards joined Zell Miller, Jesse Helms, and Sturm Thurmond to Co-Sponsor Lieberman's bill. He defended his vote for the war and even said he "wasn't duped" by the president, and said that he would invade Iraq if he were president even after no WMDs were found. He didn't back down until after 2004 was over, because he was afraid of looking "weak" on national security. Of course, now his tune has turned 180 degrees.

    He also said he's a champion of the poor, citing his work suing doctors for medical malpractice on behalf of "the little guy." And yet, when you examine his legal history, he has never done a single Pro Bono case.

    Now that he's wooing Labor Unions for primary support, he's done a lot of good work campaigning for raising the minimum wage, even though it doesn't take political courage for a Democrat to say he's in favor of it, since it plays well to the base. But if you look at his Senate record, he's responsible for a lot of stuff that went against Labor Union interests. He voted to give China most favored nation status and the attendant trade conditions of that status, even though we have a huge trade deficit with China and their taking of our manufacturing base. Edwards also voted for expansion of the H1B visa program that allows companies to import foreign high tech workers (such as programmers and computer engineers) to fill American jobs but deny them immigration status. This work visa is a non-immigration visa, so they end up taking American jobs but not being able to contribute to America's future by becoming citizens. H1-Bs have been blamed for helping to keep American software wages depressed.

    He tries to cater to the environmentalists and the poor, but then he engages in a major act of conspicuous consumption by tearing down wilderness to construct a new mansion. I think he has the right to live however he wishes, and his house is a silly issue to focus on, but it does underscore a lack of congruity.

    Now, people do change over time, and the positions of career politicians certainly do. Surely he has seen the error of Iraq by now, and perhaps he started to grow a focus on poverty and labor long after he left the Senate, thus accounting for why he didn't sponsor any anti-poverty legislation in congress. But when you see that he changes significantly on several major issues, a pattern begins to emerge.

    When I look for candidates, I try to see if their past actions match their current rhetoric and pandering. I try to see if their private faces out of the spotlight match their current public faces on the campaign trail.

    Unfortunately for Edwards, he falls short in my eyes. It rings false.

    He voted for....nay, CO-SPONSOREd...the Iraq War and now apologizes. Two ways of looking at it...Honest mistake, in which case he lacks the judgment on matters of war and peace to be president...or disingenious jockeying to follow public opinion, in which case he lacks the political courage to follow his conscience instead of the polls.

    I put a lot of thought into examining candidates who want to be my president...and I just cannot in good conscience vote for Edwards.

    Okay, pro-Edwards partisans may now troll-rate me.

    1. Re:He just doesn't ring true by T.E.D. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but he not only voted for it, he was actually the Co-Sponsor of ...

      But if you look at his Senate record, ...He voted to give ....Edwards also voted for...


      This is one of the primo reasons why senators don't generally get elected president. If you want your party to win the general election, you should really be supporting a governor or former military leader. You want someone who can talk about things accomplished by the large bureaucracy they ran, not someone who's going to be talking about all the funny looking votes and compromises they made over the last x*6 years.
    2. Re:He just doesn't ring true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll probably get troll rated by Edwards partisans, but he just doesn't ring true to me. When I examine candidates, I examine their history and look at what they've said in the past and what they say now, to see if there's a thread of consistency and integrity.


      As a centrist Democrat (formerly a centrist Republican) I agree with your post, but what politician on either side of the fence would cut the mustard with regard to your standards? I think they're all shitheads.

      That said, I'm betting the Dems are going to find a way to lose the 2008 presidential election. The only consolation is that GW Bush cannot run again.
    3. Re:He just doesn't ring true by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      I'll probably get troll rated by Edwards partisans, but he just doesn't ring true to me.

      Isn't he a tort lawyer? And a politician on top of that. By definition he's constructed of pure molecular distortium. The truth, like light, can never escape from his intense obfuscation field.

    4. Re:He just doesn't ring true by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I examine their history and look at what they've said in the past and what they say now, to see if there's a thread of consistency and integrity.
      A man who has never changed his mind in light of new information is a fool. It seems your criteria are selecting for foolishness.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    5. Re:He just doesn't ring true by asylumx · · Score: 1

      I thought I was the only one who noticed that... I call it "Realizing a mistake" and these people call it "flip flopping." Perhaps if GWB hadn't used such an idiotic defense on Kerry, he would at least not be afraid to change his mind over some of the stupid things he's gotten our people into... Now he can't change his mind or he'd be a "flip flopper" too.

    6. Re:He just doesn't ring true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Changing your mind once on an issue in light of new information is one thing.

      Changing your mind repeatedly on an issue in light of poll results is another thing entirely, and that thing is called "flip flopping" and perhaps "pandering." This manner of changing your mind is accompanied by pretending to have not changed your mind at all or offering lame excuses or claiming that your critics do not understand all of the "nuances."

  29. Being an Australian by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    I'm damn glad I don't have to put up with similar shit in games I choose to play

    1. Re:Being an Australian by Fist!+Of!+Death! · · Score: 1

      Damn right. I personally welcome Mr Edwards and many other politicians to the Half-Life 2 and PES6 online arenas. Cue multiple frags and red-card slide tackles...

      --
      Nothing witty
  30. Yeah, that's why Panda's Gone for good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Edward's campaign is so internet savvy they don't even bother to read the web site of the moonbat bloggers they before they hired them.

    Fucking idiots.

    Silky Pony's a joke.

    1. Re:Yeah, that's why Panda's Gone for good by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Is it possible that he's connected with the mooninite terrorists? (Everyone knows those moon people stick together!)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  31. Maybe in the 2012 Election by emilyridesabmx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, with all the lag on Second Life, people voting for Edwards now may see their votes effect the outcome of the 2012 elections.

    --
    Et In Arcadia Ego
  32. I'd like to ask him by doomy · · Score: 2, Informative

    What his views are on rape and pedophilia.

    I've been in SL for over 2 year now and it seems to draw the worst kind of people.

    For instance there are huge communities of people who are obsessed over the torture and enslavement of women, to the end that they treat women as animals. This has also leaked onto real life (ala Kaotians). Not to mention the horror stories I've heard from people who got into this after being involved in similar cults online.

    I've had a friend from UK, who used to be a slave in one of these online cults. Her online Dom (Master) ordered her execution after not being satisfied with her. The order was carried out by her roommate who was also a slave to this dude (guy is in Denmark). This girl tied a rope around my friend while she was unconscious and tied the other end to her car and drove. Lucky the rope snapped and broke, but it put my friend in hospital for over 200+ days. While the girl who did this is in prison, the person who ordered this crime is still free.

    Then there are the pedophiles, I've been campaigning against them for quite a while in Second Life. For the life of me, I cannot think why an adult want to have have sexual role play with another who is pretending to be a 2 or 5 year old boy or girl, and wears a photo mapped skin of real child (completely realistic with nothing censored). I do not understand these people and I think by their use of the photo mapped skin they are doing something illegal.

    I've asked many times why Lindens allow this, but they have refused to answer this question.

    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...
    1. Re:I'd like to ask him by Ailure · · Score: 1

      Actually, in a aspect Second life isn't more or less dangerous than your average IRC network or any internet-based media.

      There's probably IRC networks out there allowing those things. I don't think it would help if Linden labs started to crackdown on such stuff, considering most of people practising those "games" usually don't take it seriously, and even if the torture women in their online-fantasies they can be raging feminists real-life. (Though I'm well-aware there's dangerous cults out there that brainwashes people.) I don't want to see crackdowns on what people do online... :/

      Of course, I don't support pedophiles. I do understand that some people like to roleplay as children and being molested that way, which I find quite weird.

      But if only grownups are involved, why should I care?

    2. Re:I'd like to ask him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People can be sick fucks.
      Frankly I'd prefer they do it online than in real life.

      I've only heard of one instance of Kaotians and it turned out to be a self aggrandizing idiot. I do know of the Gorean concepts... but these aren't from SL. They're from sci-fi... (BSDM El-ron hubberd want to bes).

      I don't mean to reduce what happened to your friend, but I'd say it's the result of getting too caught up in a fantasy. It's no different from people getting killed over DND or a football match. When people let the games they play or watch have such an impact on their lives they're going to get into a bad situation.

  33. Given the debacle of his "official bloggers"... by Nino+the+Mind+Boggle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I expect this will be just as successful.

    --
    ------ "Darn floor. Big bite." (Koko the gorilla's best attempt at explaining the experience of an earthquake.)
  34. The *real* way to make a Splash on the Net by olyar · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Figure out some way to make Arnold eligible to run for President.

    Step 2: Convince Blizzard to incorporate a virtual Arnold that wanders around Ironforge and occasionally hands out Epics.

    Step 3: Size Maria for an inauguration dress.

    --
    Custom, hands-free Linux installs. Instalinux
  35. In France too by evalf · · Score: 1

    One of the French presidential candidate for the upcoming elections, Ségolène Royale, made the same move a while ago. See a screenshot of the virtual campaign.

  36. SL Elections by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    So, what kind of voting machines do they have?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  37. Mod up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I was at the Feb 15, 2003 protests in Raleigh, NC. You know, the protests BEFORE the war, to PREVENT the Iraqi quagmire the Neocons dragged us all into. It was obvious as hell at that time that the Iraq invasion was based on lies. Yet Edwards would not come out and say so. The pictures in the media of Edwards holed up in his home were priceless.

    Unfortunately it looks like NO candidates in the major parties are worth supporting this go around. Sigh ... a Dean/Kucinich ticket would have stomped Bush, but the Dems couldn't actually come out and be Democrats that year.

    1. Re:Mod up! by LibertineR · · Score: 0
      Dean and Kucinich would have stomped Bush?

      Pass the blunt, dude. You have had it too long.

  38. furries? by garutnivore · · Score: 1

    Judging by what I understand Second Life to be, I have to conclude that John Edwards is targeting furries. But seriously... it seems to me that any candidate spending any significant effort on campaigning in SL is basically saying "I have no sense of priorities but please vote for me!!!"

    1. Re:furries? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      it seems to me that any candidate spending any significant effort on campaigning in SL is basically saying "I have no sense of priorities but please vote for me!!!"

      But he isn't spending anything on this.

      While I'm not supporter of Edwards and frankly think that Second Life is a bore I think this is a no-harm no-foul situation.

      Yeah, it's neat to a point but it'll be about as influential as getting the man a billboard spot in Antarctica.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:furries? by garutnivore · · Score: 1

      Right. Let me rephrase this.

      If a candidate spends any significant effort on campaigning in SL, that candidate is basically saying "I have no sense of priorities but please vote for me!!!"

      John Edwards is no such candidate so far.

      My comment about John Edwards targeting furries was jab at SL.

    3. Re:furries? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Furries and other assorted weirdos. Seriously what the hell is the point of Second Life? The client is so atrocious and the world so painfully slow to load that I don't quite follow the point of it at all. It reminds me of TinyMud 15 years ago - you think it's going to be an MMPORG but its just a horribly inconsistent world with a bunch of people standing around asking passers by to play with the objects they created.

    4. Re:furries? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Come now, the furries are easily outnumbered by the "plastic perfection" female av's and the 7 foot tall guys with big biceps and too small heads. :-)

      That said, I think most SLers think of political figures coming into SL as a PR stunt. If the political figures took SL seriously (set up a permanent presenceon the grid with actual staffers manning it) that would be different. I personally have more respect for the artists/academics/writers who show up in SL than the politicians.

  39. This is good news by punkr0x · · Score: 1

    It brings us one step closer to a day when we can bombard the president with penises during his state of the union address!

  40. No, he's just a phony fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's a multimillionaire lawyer living in a 30,000-square-foot mansion who made his money on dubious malpractice claims channeling dead babies, but he claims he's for the little man. He acts the part of a populist, but he not only bashed WalMart - where one would think a populist's base would shop - he sent someone there to buy toys for his kids.

    He actually co-sponsors the resolution to authorize Bush to invade Iraq, defends that, says he wasn't duped by Bush. Now he spins a different tale.

    He spouts crap that there's two Americas, those that inherited wealth and power and those that won't ever have access to it. Yet then he claims in his story that he rose to wealth and power from humble beginnings, in direct contradiction to his claims about the US.

    If he were a burger-flipper at McDonalds he'd still have more money than sense.

  41. no kidding by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think he has the right to live however he wishes, and his house is a silly issue to focus on, but it does underscore a lack of congruity.

    Silly? His political wing wants us to all live in crowded cities and use public transportation all the time. He's against "urban sprawl" in the sense that he doesn't want you and me to have any space because it might "sprawl" towards his splendid wilderness vistas in his huge, private country living space.

    His house is not so silly of an issue, if you ask me.

    1. Re:no kidding by sheldon · · Score: 1

      I know of nobody who wants to force you to live in a city and take publicn transport. But I know a lot of people who would like to have that option available to themselves. I choose to live in a 2nd ring suburb which has had a reemergence of neo-urban planning. neo-urban is some new fangled name for... building sidewalks so people can actually walk places.

      I don't understand why your political wing is opposed to sidewalks. Maybe you could help explain that to me.

    2. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand why your political wing is opposed to sidewalks. Maybe you could help explain that to me.

      he was referring to "smart growth"ers: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_growth#Criticis ms_of_Smart_Growth

    3. Re:no kidding by sheldon · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Well my point was simply that representing a person's goal by distorting it isn't helpful.

      Anyway, I honestly don't know much about Smart Growth. And I don't have a problem with people wanting to live far away from the city. I went to college in Iowa, I grew up in the country. I understand the appeal.

      But what I do think is fundamental, is that people see the real costs of choosing to live somewhere and not have those costs subsidized by others who are trying to make intelligent decisions of their own. Namely, if you want to live 50 miles away from work and drive in every day... Well that's 50 miles of roads that we have to maintain for your use.

      So it seems to me that you, not me who lives 4 miles from work, should have to pay the burden of that road construction. Perhaps then people will understand that commuter trains are cheaper and stop demanding the Government pay for them to live out in bumfuck nowhere.

      Somehow though, my desire to make you pay what it costs you to live somewhere doesn't mesh with the libertarian thinkers. Amazing that.

    4. Re:no kidding by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Where I am presently living we had a (relatively) significant snowfall this week. I live waaay out in the country and drive fourty miles each way to work. I had a MUCH easier time getting in to work on the snow days that some co-workers who live in developments 'in the city.' They live in a muncipality where there are significant costs to plow that big grid of city streets, all with cars parked and stalled all along them, etc. They can and do pay that cost, for the 'luxury' of their urban lifestyle. The network of interstate highways I commute in on are needed wether I live out here or not. They connect the big cities together across the country. The cost of plowing the county roads that connect me to the highway fall on my county and my county taxes, not those of the 'big city' dwellers.

      If you don't want to 'pay the burden' for the Interstate Highway system, I suggest you stop consuming anything delivered by truck.

  42. You know... by LKM · · Score: 1

    After Afghanistan and Iraq, Americans joking about how the French always surrender has acquired a whole new level of unintentional irony. Sometimes, surrendering may be the smart choice. And it's not like the Yanks did so great in Vietnam, either. Either way, I hope facts won't keep anyone from making jingoistic remarks. They just lighten my day up.

    (Disclaimer: I'm neither French nor American)

    1. Re:You know... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what I was pointing out. I am against the Iraq war, but I find it absolutely hilarious when Europeans get all sanctimonious about it. They are showing ignorance of their history, both past and present.

    2. Re:You know... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      1) I hope that facts stay out to, but you are not helping the fact.\

      2) The come-back the French should use against us is that we are fat and ugly and lazy, and drink piss beer.

      By conforming to rule #2 you can help spur both French and US nationalism in a humorous way. By pointing out that everyone is fucked up with fascists making inroads into the political system you are simply spreading misery and understanding.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe we don't want people to keep making the same fucking mistakes that we did. Can't we learn from history and not repeat it? Lets keep war in museums where it belongs.

    4. Re:You know... by lotsotech · · Score: 1

      I don't think any of the examples are really comparable to the French surrendering Paris to the Germans which I believe is where the concept originates. Tossing up your arms to an invading force is a completely different beast.

    5. Re:You know... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Lets keep war in museums where it belongs.


            OK. Where is your museum so I can send the people from my museum over to bomb it?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:You know... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      comparable to the French surrendering Paris to the Germans which I believe is where the concept originates.

            Lots of people surrendered to the Wehrmacht, there's not much shame in it. I'm sure the UK and the US would have surrendered too, if it wasn't for simple geography and the fact that the German Navy wasn't all that good.

            It's not like the US armed forces were in any shape to take on the Germans in 1939. It took the US and all her allies over a year of fighting on several fronts to drive Germany back even in '44-45.

            The Hundred Years War kind of sums it all up really. No surrender THERE...in fact, the UK lost quite a bit of territory - and the crown of France.

            Oh this post is WAY off topic, but I'm fed up with these American bigots and their "surrender" jokes. What will they do once they "surrender" in Iraq... oh sorry, no, they "WON"...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:You know... by pregister · · Score: 1

      Oh this post is WAY off topic, but I'm fed up with these American bigots and their "surrender" jokes. What will they do once they "surrender" in Iraq... oh sorry, no, they "WON"... We'll still mock the French. Why stop when you have a good thing going?

    8. Re:You know... by LKM · · Score: 1

      What makes the French so special? The Nazis owned most of Europe.

  43. For Great Lulz by yesthatmcgurk · · Score: 1

    Lessee, Edwards ventures into the world of blogging and hires left wing maniacs with a penchant for using the word "fuck" (in its many forms) while hating on anybody to the right of Lieberman. Now he's venturing into Second Life, a world chock a block with http://www.secondlifeherald.com/slh/2006/11/did_li ve_help_l.html furries sporting erections, http://www.secondlifeherald.com/slh/2007/01/agepla y_in_seco.html pedophiles and http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Sec ond_Life other faggotry. I can hardly wait until these deviants start filling up the Edwards campagin office, trying to volunteer virtually. Maybe they should put up a sign outside that says "No shirt, no shoes, graphically depicted animal penii, no service".

  44. Wrong Platform by WingedEarth · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If a candidate really wants to get elected, they should be using World of Warcraft rather than Second Life. WoW has a MUCH bigger community than Second Life, and WoW actually takes on important issues like war, diplomacy, the afterlife, and demon attack. Neocon globalists can satisfy their international bloodlust on battlegrounds, and cowardly Democrats can hide behind their tanks and pets when a confrontation happens. Disgusting political mudslinging campaigns can be replaced with a simple duel in front of Orgrimmar.

  45. Never one to be upstaged, Hillary Clinton by THESuperShawn · · Score: 1

    Never one to be upstaged, Hillary Clinton has joined WoW as level 42 gnome and can be seen tailoring and enchanting on a nightly basis. However, she has yet to reveal her position on the Scourge invasion. While she agrees she initially voted for patch 1.11, she claims her vote was based on faulty intelligence and now opposes it. She faults the Litch King and his administration for the resulting issues.

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
  46. own a $7M mansion in 2nd life world by peter303 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hey wait, I got the real confused with 2nd life.
    There are two americas and I'm not in his.

  47. contest to be the "John Dean" of 2008 by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Dean seemingly came out of nowhere in the 2004 because he was the first presidential candidate to really leverage the internet and attract those young eyeballs who disdain conventional media. Unfortunately a combination of being the high-profile front-runner and a bad temper undid his internet advantage. I guess lots of candidates are trying to win the internet contest now.

    1. Re:contest to be the "John Dean" of 2008 by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      You mean Howard Dean. :) John Dean is someone else entirely. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dean

      --

      You are not the customer.

  48. Who actually *plays* SL anyway? by swid27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a question that's been bugging me for a while: even if you use the non-inflated numbers, who and where are the people that actually play Second Life? I do not know a single person who has played it for longer than a trivial amount of time, even though my social circle is overrepresented in practically every other area of the online world. I find it strange that SL receives so much press even though the usual reason for unjustified media hype (being owned by a media conglomerate) doesn't apply to this situation.

    I had a discussion about this with my friends recently; the best answers I got about Second Life are that it's bigger in Europe than here in the U.S., it caters more to the MySpace crowd than, say, the WoW crowd, and that, of course, it's mostly for porn anyway.

    1. Re:Who actually *plays* SL anyway? by vadim_t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People play it for different reasons, but you could put it this way:

      "Who actually *reads* slashdot?" Well, the people who find that sort of thing interesting of course. SL at its base is graphical IRC with scripts. Many people use SL for the same reason people come here: because they found a place they like and where they can talk to interesting people.

      Where all the hype is coming from I'm not sure, but it's certainly not a bad place. If you're a geek, then there's a lot to tinker with, if you're a social kind of person then there are all kinds of people to meet and talk to.

    2. Re:Who actually *plays* SL anyway? by CronoCloud · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll try to answer that question, as best I can anyway.

      SL is more popular in the US than in other parts of the world, but the demographics are changing. (Mor French and Italians showing up, for example)

      SL appeals not to hardcore geeks, or to the WoW crowd but to several groups:

      artistic folks, like those who use photoshop for work/study in RL, RL jewelry designers, clothing designers, art students, etc.

      social geeks: these folks might have hung out in certain communities in IRC and do pretty much the same in SL, The furries might be considered part of this group

      those who see something interesting in the scripting and object creation tools and try to make cool stuff.

      but overall, everyone who is in SL is in there just to have whatever fun and enjoyment they can find that they like. It could be pr0n and boobehs, it could be just hanging out with friends, it could even be shopping, or playing Tringo.

      I guess SL is what the individual makes of it.

  49. How can anyone like Edwards? by xzvf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least politically. He won his senate seat running against a right of Jesse Helms pig farmer right after a hurricane dumped pig poop all over eastern NC. He ran for president because he had no chance of re-election in NC (not because he was Democrat, but because he was not representive of the majority of people in the state). The VP pickup by Gore saved his career. So you have someone with limited experience, trial lawyer, and pretty. Obama beat Keyes (not the best canidate to understate the issue) after a likely winning Republican had a sex/beating scandel around a Star Trek babe. Offtopic now, but I think it's sad when Hillary is the most stable canidate the Democrats can put on the ticket.

  50. Stillborn by drix · · Score: 1

    That's strange, I wasn't aware it had a first life.

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  51. GIANT PENIX! by ZOMFF · · Score: 1

    I can only hope that his Second Life campaign is inundated with attacks made by giant flying penises.

    --
    Launch every sig.
  52. Drunk:? by antdude · · Score: 1

    I think he's drunk. Heh.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  53. Editorial cartoon by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Here's my first thought on reading this

    Edwards ----> .e
                 .
                .  s <----- Shark

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  54. Of course by rlp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe it'll work out better than his campaign's first life. Especially, given the two foul-mouthed bloggers who were: hired, fired, re-hired, "resigned".

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  55. I wish it would enter "Half Life" by moeinvt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    . . .along with the rest of the politicians and their campaigns.

  56. Re:Second Life is transitory - global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, he got it right. Most people, including second lifers, don't believe in the fifty-foot flame elemental secretly melting our ice caps.

  57. Furry for president? by BubbaFett · · Score: 1

    John Edwards just officially lost whatever chance he had at my vote. Next, please.

    1. Re:Furry for president? by madhatter256 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I wouldn't vote for a guy who supports a community that supports pedophilia and furries very openly.

      --
      Previewing comments are for sissies!
  58. Remind me again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the two talks to the dead, and the other one hopes the dead will vote for him... right? :-)

  59. Secret Service Rules of Engagement? by jabber · · Score: 1

    If I show up to a political rally dressed like a rabbit, or jackass, or a giant penis orbited by throbbing breasts, I would be immediately removed by the police, and would probably get the attention of the Federal government, in the bad way.

    But what if my SL avatar is a rabbit, or jackass, or a giant penis orbited by throbbing breasts, and I go visit John Edwards online? Will the Secret Service come visit me IRL? Or will they have a deal with SL to drop me from the service? Or... What?

    If I throw a rotten veggie at a politician in real life, or worse, just threaten to cause him harm, I will get into serious trouble. What happens if I do something like this to a Presidential Candidate online?

    What are the rules of engagement for political figures in cyber-space?

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
    1. Re:Secret Service Rules of Engagement? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I supposed the owner of the venue in question would set the rules. It would probably be something like:
      Rabbit avatar, fine
      Penis with orbiting boobies, not fine (It would be interesting to see though)

      The venue would probably have scripts, llPush, and object creation turned off so throwing stuff wouldn't work. You could try spamming the chat channel but any security around (and most serious events have it) would kick you out.

  60. Re:Is Edwards concerned about the two Second Life' by Pike · · Score: 1

    Yeah, how ironic: Mr. "Two Americas" campaigning in the second one.

  61. A Lounging Dragons Thoughts... by PcolaLinuxDragon · · Score: 1

    Whats got me curious... is if there is any political benefit to using this avenue to influence votes from the furry fandom, and various other abstract subcultures on SL. The majority of the members of the fur fandom are generally not politically inclined, and considering the mass of the fandom, if somehow a politician were to tap into that, it could be of reasonable influence in the votes cast. There are those few of us that are interested in politics... but on the whole, its a rather untapped area in the political respect. Anyhow.... I think that SecondLife could be a very viable angle for a politician to take, if it is used correctly. To those who base their thoughts of furry, on articles from somethingawful and MTV, etc... I've no interest in flames based on these onesided ignorant sources. There is a happy little delete button for anyone who would like to try though.

  62. Re:Is Edwards concerned about the two Second Life' by wheelgun · · Score: 1

    I'm sure John 'Man of the People' Edwards ponders the problem for hours on end as he sits around his mansion in the gated community he calls home.

  63. BWAAAHAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAA!!!!! by motown99 · · Score: 1

    Second Life? Isn't that an online game? I mean, it's.....NOT REAL.

    Doomed....we're all doomed.....

    Al Gore, please save us....

  64. Alpha World? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    No offense to Second Life, but people get a bit silly about it. I understand that it's a an interesting, fun site, but I remember playing it in 1997 when it was called Alpha World

  65. New Orleans Kickoff for Edwards by also+aswell · · Score: 1
    You may remember Edwards kicked off his campaign in New Orleans last month, promising not to forget us and to give us continual support.

    He hasn't been seen in the city since...

    --
    "Where did this apple come from?"
    --Alan Turing
  66. Psychic fun by oracle128 · · Score: 0

    John Edwards Crossing Over...to Second Life.