Slashdot Mirror


DNA to Test Theory of Roman Village in China

Reverse Gear writes "Many of the inhabitants of a lonely village in north western China seems to have distinctive western features. An old theory from the 50s suggests that a Roman legion lost in what is now Iran in the year 53BC lost their commanding officer. They traveled east, so the legend goes, working as mercenaries until they were caught by the Chinese 17 years later. The Chinese described them as using a 'fish-scale formation', which could be a reference to the well-known Roman phalanx technique called the 'tortoise'. The remainder of the legion, it is suggested, may have intermarried with the villagers in Liqian. Scientists are now trying to verify the fascinating theory by testing the DNA of the inhabitants of the Chinese village."

203 comments

  1. First they conquered Europe... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... then they got lost in China!

    1. Re:First they conquered Europe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Read more here, including a picture.

      Anybody familiar with history will know Europeans have long rambled across most of Asia. Even today there are fully European looking people in Afghanistan, and most Indians and all Persians and Pakistanis have some or even alot of European ancestry. Despite the name 'European' the 'Europeans' have always lived in parts of Asia.

    2. Re:First they conquered Europe... by karolo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, there are different theories, but one of them says, based on linguistic evidence, that it worked the other way around, that is, the Europeans came from the region that we nowadays know as Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan. That would explain the close linguistic relation between most European languages and Persian and Hindi.

    3. Re:First they conquered Europe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've got your timelines confused, you're thinking of before the Europeans even entered Europe 40,000 years ago. The Indo-Iranian languages were brought to Persia and India from eastern Europe much later, after they had migrated out from the Indo-European homeland around Anatolia. You've also confused "European" with the Indo-European languages; there are European languages that don't belong to the Indo-European family.

    4. Re:First they conquered Europe... by bogjobber · · Score: 2, Informative

      The proto-Indo-European language/culture (or Indo-Iranian or Arya-European; there's not a clear distinction, especially among non-linguists) most likely started in Central Asia and worked its way both west into Europe and south into Northern India/Pakistan/Afghanistan. The split occurred before recorded history, and it's extremely difficult to tell exactly when and where it happened linguistically without other clues. I'm not sure if any languages in East Asia are from the Indo-European family, but I would imagine there was at least some small amount of cultural exchange. The Aryans migrated all over the place.

    5. Re:First they conquered Europe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading somewhere (possibly on Slashdot) years ago about how the Aryan charachteristics came from the Scandinavian countries during the Ice Age. Can anyone confirm or deny this?

    6. Re:First they conquered Europe... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That would explain the close linguistic relation between most European languages and Persian and Hindi.
      That has been explained pretty well for a long time now.

      As for where Europeans originate from, the most likely candidate nowadays is considered to be the land between the Black and Caspian seas.

  2. Hmm... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 0, Redundant

    When in Rome, do as the Romans...go to China?

    Hmm could these have been the first Italians to eat noodles?

    Or perhaps the first westerners to catch yellow fever?

    Either way, I for one welcome our [ancient] lost Roman overlords.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    1. Re:Hmm... by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now here's a theory!
      Supposing that the Romans introduced spaghetti to the Chinese!
      Hmmmm......
      And then Marco Polo brought it back?

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    2. Re:Hmm... by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Ok, but how about the sauce??

    3. Re:Hmm... by aufumy · · Score: 1

      As Bayoudegradeable pointed out, there is evidence of noodles in China 4000 years ago.

      And as CRCulver mentioned that pasta is nowhere to be found in the texts at all. "We know more about Roman dining customs than about any other ancient people, with whole recipes reconstructed, see Patrick Fass' Around the Roman Table [amazon.com] (University of Chicago Press, 2005). "

    4. Re:Hmm... by agrippa_cash · · Score: 1

      In Peter Robb's Midnight in Sicily he attributes the introduction of pasta to the Arabs. Additionally, Marco Polo mentions a that the people in China eat a type of vermacelli, which suggests that he had a name for at least one kind of pasta before going east.

  3. Where no one has gone before~ by bronney · · Score: 1, Funny

    The village is now overlooked by a pillared portico, in the hope of attracting tourists.

    God damn Romulans!!!!!!111!!!

  4. Romans.. by jovius · · Score: 1

    The great roman empire has set it's limb on China, it seems.

    1. Re:Romans.. by aufumy · · Score: 1

      You mean the great Roman empire lost it's limb in China, since they were lost and caught by the Chinese.

  5. Not the first indication of Europeans in China.. by the_rajah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Strikingly well preserved mummies from the Takla Makan desert region have strongly European characterstics such as red hair and blue eyes dating from as far back as 3800 BP. DNA analysis on these mummies indicates Indo/European origin. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/chinamum/taklamakan.h tml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarim_mummies

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  6. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by meringuoid · · Score: 1, Informative
    Strikingly well preserved mummies from the Takla Makan desert region have strongly European characterstics such as red hair and blue eyes dating from as far back as 3800 BP.

    Yeah, but that proves little; Taklamakan is a Soft Place. Those guys could have wandered back from 6000 AD for all we know, stopping for a picnic with Fiddler's Green along the way.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  7. Pasta by seyyah · · Score: 1

    If proven, then the theory that Marco Polo brought spaghetti to Italy will finally have some competition. Were noodles, in fact, a Roman invention introduced to the Chinese? (Anyone having been to Xinjiang Province in western China will note the striking similarity between the wheat noodles there with Italian spaghetti).

    1. Re:Pasta by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If proven, then the theory that Marco Polo brought spaghetti to Italy will finally have some competition. Were noodles, in fact, a Roman invention introduced to the Chinese?

      The problem of ascribing pasta to the Romans is that this particular food is not described in the texts at all. We know more about Roman dining customs than about any other ancient people, with whole recepies reconstructed, see Patrick Fass' Around the Roman Table (University of Chicago Press, 2005). And pasta is nowhere to be found.

    2. Re:Pasta by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      Actually the idea of pasta in italy existed before marco polo, it's just certain types of pasta, like spaghetti which seem to have been influenced by the chinese.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    3. Re:Pasta by Falkkin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In addition to the fact that European spaghetti dates to 300 BC, there's also controversy over whether Marco Polo ever went to China at all. Polo's famous book about his travels never mentioned any Chinese place names, the Chinese style of writing, chopsticks, or woodblock printing. The Chinese bureaucrats never recorded his presence, despite recording the presence of other Westerners who had been to China (Polo was not the first Westerner in China, but he was the first to write a book about it). Many modern scholars think that Polo perhaps ended up in the Middle East, and wrote the book about China based on third-hand knowledge he heard from Persians or Arabs there.

    4. Re:Pasta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the other referenced book A Taste of Ancient Rome- there is a mention of pasta in page 227 of the index.

      Roman Cookery: Ancient Recipes for Modern Kitchens also has a reference.

      Fascinating menu - dolphin meatballs, roasted parrot, squid patties, jellyfish omelettes. I think I'll stick with the tuna steaks.

    5. Re:Pasta by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      But what could they do with pasta until the tomato was brought over from the Americas?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:Pasta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, marco polo was about fifteen hundred years later than the romans (give or take a century)

    7. Re:Pasta by vistic · · Score: 1

      "In addition to the fact that European spaghetti dates to 300 BC"

      It's worth pointing out that European spaghetti refers here to the noodle itself and not what we think of now as prepared "spaghetti" since the tomato didn't find it's way to Italy until the 1700s.

    8. Re:Pasta by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      But what could they do with pasta until the tomato was brought over from the Americas?

      Italians either drown everything in tomato sauce or they drown everything in cream and butter sauce.

      Damn, now I'm hungry.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:Pasta by sjwaste · · Score: 1

      Italians either drown everything in tomato sauce or they drown everything in cream and butter sauce.

      Wow, there's a lot you don't know about Italian cooking if that's your impression. I think you just described the Olive Garden, not an Italian kitchen.

    10. Re:Pasta by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      It's worth pointing out that European spaghetti refers here to the noodle itself and not what we think of now as prepared "spaghetti" since the tomato didn't find it's way to Italy until the 1700s.
      Easy on the "we" there, please. We don't all share the same cultural background here. I'm not sure what you're imagining - presumably "spaghetti" in your everyday usage refers to a specific spaghetti dish? - but there's certainly no tight connection in my mind between "spaghetti" and "tomato", other than the fact that the two - which are separate and quite distinct ingredients - are often served together.
    11. Re:Pasta by vistic · · Score: 1

      Ok... in America "Spaghetti" usually means either spaghetti marinara or spaghetti bolognese. In fact it's rare to see spaghetti any other way here. And my travels to other countries are limited but that's also the kind of sauce I've seen this noodle served with in other countries.

  8. suspicious?? by markxsd · · Score: 5, Funny

    From TFA...

    Gu Jianming, who lives near Liqian, said he was surprised to be told he might be descended from a European imperial army. But the birth of his daughter was also a surprise. Gu Meina, now six, was born with a shock of blonde hair.

    If my wife gave birth to a half Chinese baby and told me that it was descended from an ancient lost tribe of Chinese settlers, I might be somewhat suspicious. Gu Jianming, wake up man, she cheated on you... My guess it is with the blond guy you saw in the village about 9 months ago!

    1. Re:suspicious?? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Yeah man! She was HOT!!!!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    2. Re:suspicious?? by Bob54321 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gu Meina, now six, was born with a shock of blonde hair.

      My guess it is with the blond guy you saw in the village about 9 months ago!


      Your math is shocking... either that or there has been some technological advances not reported on Slashdot.
      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    3. Re:suspicious?? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      Well, the doctor takes many forms.

    4. Re:suspicious?? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Do any of the sheep look like Captain Jack?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:suspicious?? by Ankou · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know it would save a lot of money and time if we settled this on the Maury Povich show. "Marcus Aurelius, you ARE the father!" Man that back child support fo that many years will be a BITCH!

    6. Re:suspicious?? by UseTheSource · · Score: 1

      That's pretty funny... But in actuality, since blond hair is a recessive trait, both parents have to be a carrier of the gene.

      --
      "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer." -Adolf Hitler
      "We are one Nation, we are one People." -The One 'leader'
    7. Re:suspicious?? by antarctican · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If my wife gave birth to a half Chinese baby and told me that it was descended from an ancient lost tribe of Chinese settlers, I might be somewhat suspicious. Gu Jianming, wake up man, she cheated on you... My guess it is with the blond guy you saw in the village about 9 months ago!

      While chuckled while reading the article and had the same thought, genetically, that's not possible. Blond hair is a recessive trait; you need both parents to have the gene. So unless one of this fellow's parents also had an affair with a blond to produce him, you musing simply doesn't add up.

      It wouldn't be the first time Western traits were found in Chinese population. I remember visiting the Natural History museum in my girlfriend's home city of Chongqing 2 years ago and there was a display there talking about Europeans migrating and interbreeding with locals. However the timeframe for this would have been a thousand or two years before the Roman Empire, back when humanity was generally more nomadic.

      I'll say one thing, it definitely now puts this village on a list of places I'd love to visit and see. I've been to this region of China before, but didn't get that far north; I went straight west all the way to Urumqi.

    8. Re:suspicious?? by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blonde hair is a recessive trait, which means that it can easily hide for many generations, especially in a population where it is rare.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    9. Re:suspicious?? by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Slightly off topic, but slightly on topic. I dated a girl from Taiwan once who was telling me about her Aunty who has blonde curly hair. They had a Dutch sailor who married into their family hundreds of years earlier.

      With what you're saying here, obviously there must have been some European on the girls other side of the family for it to have come out in her Aunty the way it did.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  9. How can they test? by DMiax · · Score: 1

    AFAY DNA testing is made against 13 well identified DNA sequences with low rate of corruption. It is done on DNA from two individuals, to see if they can belong to the same genetic tree.

    Given that at each generation each sequence has 50% probability to be passed on, in n generations the probability of having at least one original gene is 1-(1-2^-n)^13.

    If I am not wrong, this gives 34% probability of having 1 gene left after 5 generations; in 10 generations it's about 1%.

    I strongly laughed when a biologist friend told me this, just after seeing Da Vinci Code...

    OTOH maybe we are not talking of the same test, the article doesn't explain.

    1. Re:How can they test? by Bob54321 · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are genetic markers that separate the Asian and European populations quite well - much study of the difference between these populations has been part of the HapMap project.

      I haven't read the article... but I don't think they will use the standard 13 markers used for e.g. paternity testing. More likely to use the chips that contain more than 500000 markers to get a good coverage of the genome. Assuming only one Roman was in an individual's ancestry, after ten generations 0.5^10*500000 = 488 markers would be from the Roman. Only one needs to distinguish Asian/European ancestry for some sort of proof. It would still be difficult to make an definitive statement about Romans but give the good circumstantial evidence I don't think the burden of proof will be too high.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:How can they test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mitochondrial DNA

    3. Re:How can they test? by FIT_Entry1 · · Score: 0

      Thanks! It only took 10 posts before someone used ^n in a post, I won the bet. :)

    4. Re:How can they test? by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is only passed down from mother to daughter. while a male child will get it from his mother his child will get it from theirs.

      A roman legion is most likely all male. while possible a few women a were present it is doubtful. especially after being lost for 17 years.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:How can they test? by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

      especially after being lost for 17 years.
      They were not lost, just slightly unsure of where they were invading.
      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    6. Re:How can they test? by Bob54321 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Replying to my own message I know... but going away and thinking about this some more, they will probably try looking at the Y chromosome. The Y chromosome is passed down intact in the male line so will give a very strong European signal if a Roman ancestor was a direct male only ancestor. I'm guessing the mitochondrial line which is passed down in the female line would be no good as not many Roman solders were female...

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    7. Re:How can they test? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      Plus, the worst case scenario assumed that generation intermarried with pure chinese DNA, and if they settled down in a community there might have been a relatively low rate of leakage... perhaps the differences even helped, the only children who could leave the village with no stigma were the "normal" ones... just a passing idea.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    8. Re:How can they test? by Speare · · Score: 4, Funny

      A roman legion is most likely all male. while possible a few women a were present it is doubtful. especially after being lost for 17 years.

      Yeah, if a woman was along with all those lost men, she would have asked for directions!

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    9. Re:How can they test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 funny :-)

    10. Re:How can they test? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Does that 50% figure properly account for multiple births(i.e., is the gene more likely to survive if a couple has 6 children than if they have 2) in each generation?

      Also, does it account of amorous cousins? It would seem that it would be slightly higher if both parents had some fraction.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:How can they test? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The term "camp follower" derives from the collection of merchants, the ancient equivalent of "contractors", family and prostitutes that followed legions.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    12. Re:How can they test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of mitochondrial DNA. You're right that it traces the maternal line. However, the research in question is using chromosomal DNA.

    13. Re:How can they test? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      I was actually discussing the Roman/Chinese question with a genetic anthropologist over dinner the other night. She's tracking Irish population waves, and almost all the work is statistical against the markers. She also mentioned that they tend to have to find custom markers each time for different populations, and it's pretty easy after you've collected enough samples to identify which ones you're looking for. It's one of those things where you simply collect data until you know what you're looking for by examining already collected data. Nifty stuff... of course the hard part is sitting in the region and getting people to give you genetic samples. I forgot to ask her what exactly they collect for samples.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    14. Re:How can they test? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Generally, nuclear DNA is not the only DNA that they can test. In most situations mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) can be used to trace maternal lineage. In this case, mtDNA may not be used since it was not likely any that there were female Roman soldiers.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    15. Re:How can they test? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > I was actually discussing the Roman/Chinese question with a genetic anthropologist
      > over dinner the other night. She's tracking
      >
      > ...
      >
      > of course the hard part is sitting in the region and getting people to give you genetic samples

      Is she cute? "Excuse me, sir. Could you give me a genetic sample?" "Uhh, sure, no problem!"

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    16. Re:How can they test? by edjs · · Score: 1

      I'd expect a legion to have a significant number of camp followers, including plenty of prostitutes.

    17. Re:How can they test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The presence of mitochondrial DNA would do a nice job of telling the researchers the origin of the european ancestry. There was some question as to whether this was a group of soldiers or simply a distant village. If they find european mitochodria they'll know that it was most likely not a group of soldiers.

    18. Re:How can they test? by theckhd · · Score: 2, Funny

      (1 woman + legion of male soldiers)*(17 lonely years)=?

      If a woman was along with all those lost men, she would probably be too exhausted to ask for directions.

    19. Re:How can they test? by rifter · · Score: 1

      Nifty stuff... of course the hard part is sitting in the region and getting people to give you genetic samples. I forgot to ask her what exactly they collect for samples.

      Simple ... she swabs the crockery/silverware after eating dinner with them. Bon appetit! :D

      What, you thought she captured specimens of some other *ahem* genetic material? Well that was just wishful thinking :D.

    20. Re:How can they test? by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is most likely done through Y chromosome research. The Genographic project uses Y chromosome (male lineage) and mitochondria (female lineage) to determine human origins.

    21. Re:How can they test? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Funny
      I was thinking of cheek swabs versus blood samples and how they are preserved in less than sterile field environments. I was also wondering about legal and cultural issues that would complicate the collection of said samples.
      .
      It seems that the rest of Slashdot has a much more haploid oriented view of DNA collection than I do.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    22. Re:How can they test? by jedkwon · · Score: 1

      To suggest they were lost would embolden the enemy and weaken the resolve of the Roman allies.

    23. Re:How can they test? by Grant_Watson · · Score: 1

      I'd expect a legion to have a significant number of camp followers, including plenty of prostitutes.

      I was thinking the same thing, but how many of the original bunch would have stuck with the legion for 17 years? Seems likely to me that they would have dropped out over time and been gradually replaced by locals. <shrug>

    24. Re:How can they test? by KH · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm guessing the mitochondrial line which is passed down in the female line would be no good as not many Roman solders were female...
      But Bwian's father was a woman centuwion...
    25. Re:How can they test? by tajmahall · · Score: 1

      Of course you make the assumption that it was a legion and not some other social unit including women. In any case they might as well test everything they can.

    26. Re:How can they test? by emilper · · Score: 1

      do not be so certain. Then, as now, there were lots of women in the army. Not in combat posts, but cooking etc.

  10. Unclear by UED++ · · Score: 2, Funny

    An old theory from the 50s suggests that a Roman legion lost in what is now Iran in the year 53BC lost their commanding officer. What is that supposed to mean? Did they lose a battle and flee to china rather than facing their superiors? Did they lose their sense of direction? (How can you mistake east for west?) Maybe they were LARPing and got a bit carried away?
    1. Re:Unclear by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For a glimpse at this kind of disaster, I'd certainly recommend Xenophon's Anabasis , his chronicle of joining 10,000 Greek mercenaries hired by Cyrus to overthrow his brother for the Persian throne, and then helping lead them back home after Cyrus was slain in battle. When your commanding office is killed while you are deep in enemy territory, you don't have too many open routes to get away. Xenophon took his comrades back to Greece by a rather roundabout way. These Romans must have found themselves force to go in a direction further and further away from Italy.

    2. Re:Unclear by pixiepaws · · Score: 5, Informative

      Check out a book called "Black Horse Odyssey" by David Harris (isbn 1-862452-270-8) it was first published in 1991 by the Wakefield Press. The Roman troops in question were the remnants of a Roman army led by Crassus (the guy who finally wacked Sparticus) that was defeated by the Parthians in 53BC. A portion of the captives were transported to the Sogdian Rock (a fort taken by Alexander the Great many years before). Sometime later a Chinese army entered that part of the world and captured the Rock but they were impressed with the Romans fighting ability (the fish scale formation) and they took 280 or so of em back to China where they ended up on frontier duty for the Chinese. David Harris was put onto the case when he saw some images of come Chinese military art that was done in the style of Roman art. Also the buildings in the area are proportioned after from practice rather than Chinese.

    3. Re:Unclear by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      What is that supposed to mean? Did they lose a battle and flee to china

            Yes, Crassus lost a battle against the Parthians and was captured and executed. Some 150 men managed to escape. Historians assume they hired themselves out as a mercenary force and headed east, where they fought the Mongols - whose history describes having encountered a foreign fighting unit that used "scales of the fish" tactics (possibly the testudo formation) near that time period.

            It's all theory and conjecture, but you never know. It will be fun to see the results of this, although my money is against them being roman ;)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Unclear by ToddML · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, Anabasis was the not so subtle inspiration for Sol Yurick's novel "The Warriors", which was turned into a 70s cult classic of the same name, and recently revived as a video game by the GTA crew.

    5. Re:Unclear by Cinnamon+Whirl · · Score: 1, Informative

      On a similar note, (though lesser scale) there are stories of the remnants of the Spanish Armada sailing around the north of Britain and back down through the Irish sea. Many of the ships were wrecked on the coast of both northern Ireland and west england, leading to settlements of Spaniards in both countries.

    6. Re:Unclear by Sique · · Score: 1

      Curiously the greek word "xenophon" means "strange sound" or "foreign sound" :) So Xenophon himself might not have been a native greek.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    7. Re:Unclear by stephencrane · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cecil Adams ("The Straight Dope") published an article in the late 80's debunking this oft-repeated idea.

    8. Re:Unclear by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Never heard of any in England (they'd have likely been massacred, given the political situation at the time) but I've heard a few people of Irish ancestry talk of a "throwback" in the family, i.e. dark haired & eyed when the rest are the more typical blonde/ginger/mouse and blue/green/grey eyed. Could just be born on the wrong side of the blanket, of course...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Unclear by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Xenophon's genealogy is well-established. He was from an aristocratic Attic family, as Greek as one could get. Greek names do not necessary reflect the characteristics of those who bear them. Was Xanthippus a yellow horse?

    10. Re:Unclear by xocp · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about a free link to Xenophon's Anabasis. No need to buy a book that was written over 1500 years ago. Talk about expired copyright...

    11. Re:Unclear by vondiggity · · Score: 1

      I believe they were captured in the Battle of Carrhae in modern Turkey about 53BCE. Basically the Romans were captured, sent to guard an eastern province of the Parthian empire that was later overran by the Chinese from the Han Empire. See the Wikipedia article for more details.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Carrhae

    12. Re:Unclear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this stroy is rather popular among some military historians. In 53 BC Crassus lost battle of Carrhae to Parthians (due to his commanding 'talent', mostly). Out of his ~45000 army ~20000 were killed in battle, ~10000 returned to Syria; more than likely, the remaining 15000 were either killed or captured and used as slaves. However, there is a legend that a fraction of the legion acted as mercenaries in the Partian army. Some years after the battle they defended the eastern border of the Partian Empire, and, possibly, were among the ones trying to stop the advancing Chinese. Due to Chinese superior military technology (long ranged crossbows), the Romans were quickly annihilated. As to this DNA question, it is probably of much later origin. In II - III centuries AD the Romans established solid trade relations with China. They even had an embassies in there, so it's not a surprise locals have some Roman blood in their veins.

    13. Re:Unclear by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Speaking as one who took a degree in Classics, you'll never see lecturers recommend those old translations. They were prepared before modern standards for translation, are written in antiquated English, tend to leave out passages considered too racy for readership of the time, rarely have contextual materials (and those which do neglect women and non-Greeks in antiquity), and miss out on the latest archaeological work. It's worth paying a few bucks to Penguin or a university press for something more reliable.

    14. Re:Unclear by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      An army in those days was unlike an army today. They were not commanded from the government in Rome. Nor were they supplied and fed by Rome. They were send out to some far off place where communications and supply were imposable. Commanders were given great power, even to make treaties that were binding on Rome. Even a "centurian", a man who commands only 100 men could speak for the government of Rome. While the officers were trusted, had great power and were educated the man were likely illiterate and certainly could not find their way home from 500 miles away.

    15. Re:Unclear by icegreentea · · Score: 1

      it always thought it was when the parthians completely stopped a roman campaign. they managed to capture entire legions (including this one) and ended up shipping them to the other end of the parthian empire (right next to china), before they ended up as mercs.

    16. Re:Unclear by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      In reality - translations ARE colored by the times.

      Does that make the translation better? Yes and no... For example: we're now forced to think whether Achilles final battle was simply the failed revenge of a lover instead of looking towards a higher purpose. It both detracts and adds.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  11. Like this, I'd think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't that assume substantial mixing with a larger gene pool? If there's little mixing then it wouldn't be surprising if the genetic propensity to, for example, have "big noses" -- thanks a lot to the Chinese for that joke at the expense of us Westerners! -- might well be inherited since it would come not from *one* ancestor but *many*.

    But I suspect they will be looking at the Y-Chromosome, which is inherited in the direct male line. So there you have a single thread going right back. It's where I would start. If there's a possibility this population descends in part from foreign soldiers, the direct male line seems the place to look first.

    http://www.le.ac.uk/genetics/maj4/project.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y_chromosome#Genetic_ genealogy

  12. a bit far... by symes · · Score: 4, Funny

    to go for a take out - dontcha think?

    1. Re:a bit far... by thewiz · · Score: 1

      Not really, rather, this is what happens when the guy who can read the map gets killed and you just end up roman around looking for a place to eat.

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  13. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by clickety6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    mummies from the Takla Makan desert region have strongly European characterstics such as red hair and blue eyes

    Commenting on the discovery, Professor Cartman said "These people - the Gingers - were the chosen race but with their red hair, freckles, and pale skin they obviously could not stand the sun."

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  14. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by cbv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    True. I remember watching a documentation on ancient Greek stories and myths about the Amazons (no, not the company).

    While trying to hunt down the Amazons origins, they visited some nomads somewhere in China (or Mongolia, can't remember where exactly) and took DNA samples of a blonde 10 or 12 year old girl with distinct Caucasian features -- although her mother had none of these whatsoever.

    Lo and behold, her DNA (and her mothers!) was identical to DNA samples taken from an Amazon mummy of something like a warrior-priestess found in what is nowadays Ukraine.

    Meaning, the girl was a direct descendant of that woman who lived around 2,000 years ago.

  15. But... by dohzer · · Score: 1

    What if none of the Romans got busy with the Chinese women?

    1. Re:But... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I think the chances of that are infinitesimal. Where there are soldiers and women, babies soon arrive.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:But... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      To quote my English teacher: "Roman soldiers would screw anything that moved, and some things that didn't"

    3. Re:But... by comradeeroid · · Score: 2, Funny

      That'd be the lost greek legion.

      --
      If you see a rock violating the law of gravity, then the law is wrong, not the rock!
    4. Re:But... by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unlike their earlier Greek counterparts, Roman soldiers were forbidden from interfering with each other and were also forbidden from interfering with themslves (THAT was a death penalty offence). The chances of any Roman soldier passing up the opportunity of getting jiggy with the local ladies is teeny-tiny.

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    5. Re:But... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Written by someone who has clearly never spent extended periods of time with only other men (soldiers) for company. Having done just that myself (10 yrs active duty), I can assure you that anything that has to squat to urinate is fair game.

    6. Re:But... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Sorry, wrong parent, should have been posted to grandparent

    7. Re:But... by mrex · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unlike their earlier Greek counterparts, Roman soldiers were forbidden from interfering with each other and were also forbidden from interfering with themslves

      Ahhhh yes, "Directivus Primus".

    8. Re:But... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      Umm, are you implying that female dogs need to stay away from soldiers posted in remote areas?

      Just asking...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:But... by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Roman soldiers were forbidden from interfering with each other and were also forbidden from interfering with themselves

      Not being familiar with this particular use of the word interfere, my first thought was "That's pretty cool that they were forbidden to interfere with their mates, but themselves? Why would you need a rule to keep dudes from cock-blocking their own game?"

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    10. Re:But... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      Implying, nothing. It's just pretty much getting stated.

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    11. Re:But... by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 1

      I'm not too sure *why* the rule existed but the punishment was that you would be beaten to death by your colleagues armed with big sticks. Yes, indeedio - BEATEN. Not hanged, not beheaded, no lethal injection just big, big sticks.

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    12. Re:But... by CptPicard · · Score: 1

      It is quite interesting that in ancient Greece, they actually thought that having men fight in pairs where they have feelings for each other actually makes the whole unit fight better. The theory was that that way, you'd have two men fight as one and want to survive together, thus making both more heroic in battle. One needs to keep in mind that in this time and age, there was nothing "sissy" about being homosexual; homoeroticism was very much compatible with courage in battle. Of course you'd never want to lose the respect of your loved companion, etc... I wonder what would happen if this kind of camaraderie was encouraged in modern militaries, instead of ridiculed as weakness of character? :-)

      This sort of thinking extended elsewhere, too. The pederasty system made it actually desirable for a young man to have an older male lover, who would mentor him in the ways of the world while "appreciating" his youthful beauty and vigor. Plato for example went to great pains to figure out whether this love should be just, uh, "platonic", or whether it should be consummated as well. I am pretty glad those times are over, though, as the idea that my supervisor would be fondling my dick while we discuss my thesis is, frankly, disgusting, no matter how many a great intellectual advance was created in the Akademeia in exactly this way...

      I'm not completely averse to the basic idea, though. It *is* really amusing to think of the Swedish national hockey team adopting this as their new junior team coaching method, though, as a way of "transferring knowledge" from generation to generation :-)

      --
      I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
    13. Re:But... by jasonjacks0n · · Score: 1

      Interesting post. Wish I had mod points for you..

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  16. Why not? by metushelach · · Score: 0, Troll

    If the Egyptians (could have) sailed to South America and the Africans (could have) reached Australia and NZ, then this is really nothing compared to that.

    It does, however, bring up the issue of the Chinese ego, which is already big as it is. Before you know it they will claim to all being decendents of Caeser or something.

    1. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's rather egotistical of you, as a westerner, to think the Chinese would value the lineage of Roman dictators over their own emperors.

    2. Re:Why not? by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      I also doubt it, the chinese very likely value their emperors above all others. Out of historical reasons

      Btw. Rome is indeed an interesting issue, even nowadays- Anyway, we have way too many countries already claiming to be inheritors of the roman throne. Currently we have, indirectly russia, basically france, or nowadays the whole EU, also maybe you can add greece, and also the united states.

      None of those countries or regions currently claim anything in this area directly, but all of them see themselves and indirect successors. Also add to that that the western roman emperor title, currently is vacant but could be given to someone anytime, also the eastern roman emperor title currently is legally defunct, but not yet directly dead. Also we have quite a few families who could make a claim due to historical reasons, with the Habsburgs and Romanovs being happily alive but not claiming it currently.

    3. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not a westerner, he's a troll.

  17. Failed Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My ancestry is from that region of China. Now I know why I failed Math.

  18. Photos of Liqian Residents by likerice · · Score: 5, Interesting
    this story is covered in a number of places. the Telegraph has a slideshow featuring a few pictures of liqian residents here.

    slide #7 features a young girl with semi-blond hair, and #10 is a close-up of an older man with green-hazel eyes.

  19. I remember the story a little differently... by Sibko · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...than the summary. It seems to imply the Romans headed east of their own free will until they met the Chinese. Here's the full story for anyone interested:

    THE LOST LEGION

    The battle of Carrhae ended 53 years before the birth of Jesus Christ, in the last day of the month of may, with a shameful disaster for the Roman army. Seven legions having the strength of 45,000 soldiers were humiliated and routed by 10,000 Parthian archers. Carrhae, an ancient biblical city now known as Harran, is located on Turkey's oriental border. The commanding officer of this unfortunate expedition was Marcus Licinius Crassus, a 62 years old tribune who had organized that campaign eager to gain glory and wealth, even though he was already one of the most rich and powerful men in Rome. Perhaps he did it just because he envied the military successes of Pompeius Magnus and Caesar, and foolishly thought that he may equal them, even though Pompeius Magnus and Caesar were war professionals while Crassus was a mere amateur. His only triumph had been the bloody defeat of Spartacus, but achieved with Pompeius' help: in fact he had too little experience and genius to embark on a large-scale operation abroad.

    The Republican government loathed to let him depart with such a sizeable army as there was no real emergency in the east, but Crassus eventually enlisted the support of Pompeius Magnus and Caesar, who did not fail to see the opportunity to free themselves of a powerful competitor whilst waiting to settle the score with each other. During the hot public debate in the Senate a tribunus plebis named Ateius attempted to stop him. Plutarcus writes that, when he realised that his efforts were in vain and that he would not receive enough supporting votes, he lit a brazier and, while throwing grains of incense into the flames, started to curse Crassus and evoke the infernal gods. Judging from the name and the behaviour of this man, we can guess that he was of Etruscan descent. Some metropolitan legions grouped in Rome and marched through Campania and then met at Brindisi with the others coming up from Calabria and then left in spite of the stormy sea. Not all the ships reached the other shore. Crassus had fortune, the blind goddess, on his side during his youth: he came out unscathed from the civil wars; then was implicated in the Catiline conspiracy but bore no consequences; he paid the debts of a spendthrift Caesar whilst being tightfisted himself and with his family. But things had changed and while aging he became a blunderer, making mistakes which were numerous and serious. For instance, in a speech to his soldiers he proclaimed that he would destroy a bridge "so that none of you will be able to return". Noticing their dismayed expression, Crassus corrected himself by explaining that he was referring to the enemy, not his own soldiers. He ordered the distribution of lentils and salt to the troops, oblivious of the fact that this was the meal offered at funerals. The worst possible omen occurred when Crassus dropped on the floor the slippery entrails of a sacrificial animal that were placed in his hands by a haruspex. (a soothsayer) Crassus attempted to correct this mistake by crying, "Fear not, despite my age, the hilt of my sword will not slip out of my hand". On the day of the battle, Crassus wore a black tunic, instead of the purple one de rigeur for Roman generals. Even though Crassus quickly returned to his tent to change, he left his officers speechless. We can still imagine those officers crossing their fingers ("fare le corna", forefinger and little finger raised, a very efficacious propitiatory gesture of Etruscan origin) and grasp a certain part of their body. Moreover, Crassus refused to listen to his veterans who were in favour of marching on the coast and avoid the desert to reach the Parthian capital. Rather, he trusted the arab Arimanes and his six thousand horsemen, who had secretly sided with the Parthians and abandoned the Romans few

  20. Macedonians in Pakistan by seyyah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is also a similar story in the Chitral Valley in northern Pakistan, where many of the local Kalash people have blue eyes and blond hair and worship a pantheon of gods. They claim descent from Alexander the Great's Macedonian soldiers. The difference with the story about Romans in China is that Greeks did actually enter today's Afghanistan and Pakistan with his army. The Bactrian Empire in Afghanistan was one of the successor states to Alexander's own empire. There have been attempts to prove this theory through DNA testing as well.

    1. Re:Macedonians in Pakistan by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There is also a similar story in the Chitral Valley in northern Pakistan, where many of the local Kalash people have blue eyes and blond hair and worship a pantheon of gods.

      Nice story, but probably not a word of truth in it. Remember, this is Pakistan. This is where the crazy Taliban folks got started. You might have heard of the Taliban. They blew up statues of Buddha when they ran Afghanistan. They put Christian aid workers on trial for their lives for supposedly trying to convert the local populice. Do you really think it's credible that anywhere in Pakistan people who "worship a pantheon of gods" would be allowed to live and do so? Because I don't. Here's a quote from the Wikipedia entry on the region -
      "The culture is conservative Islamic."
      I think this casts a lot of doubt about the accuracy of your post.

    2. Re:Macedonians in Pakistan by bloobloo · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're going to quote Wikipedia, at least look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalasha_of_Chitral

    3. Re:Macedonians in Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont blame u! I blame your media. I am from Pakistan and there are different religions here:
      Zoroastrians: worship fire, mainly live in Karachi, southern Pakistani City
      Kalash: Northern Pakistan, Chitral
      Yusufzai: Jewish ancestors, tribe mountains bordering Afghanistan and Pakistan, the name is derived from "Yusuf" -> Joseph, from Egypt

      I've also heard about a tribe in Nothern Areas, which are atheists and practice homosexuality!

      That Taliban thin is a minority in this part of the world

    4. Re:Macedonians in Pakistan by smoker2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Are you a complete moron ? The situation in Pakistan today is as relevant to the historical past as comparing the USA to ancient Egypt.
      Pakistan didn't exist as an autonomous state until 1947.

      Try reading a little bit of fact to reduce your ignorance.

      Here's another less leading quote from Wikipedia :

      Pakistan has a very rich cultural and traditional background going back to Indus Valley Civilization, 2800 BC-1800 BC. The region of Pakistan has been invaded in the past, occupied and settled by many different people, including Dravidians, Aryans, Greeks, White Huns, Persians, Arabs, Turks, Mongols and various Eurasian groups. And indeed the region has formed a distinct cultural unit within the main cultural complex of South Asia from prehistoric times. There are differences in culture among the different ethnic groups in matters such as dress, food, and religion, especially where pre-Islamic customs differ from Islamic practices. The cultural origins come from the civilizations of North India and eastern Afghanistan, with significant influences from Persia, Turkestan and Hellenistic Greece. However, it was the first part of the subcontinent to receive the full impact of Islam. Hence it has developed an identity of its own.
    5. Re:Macedonians in Pakistan by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.

      How long have the taliban been in existence? And did they ever run the government of Pakistan?

      Way to stereotype a country of 150 million! Not to mention a religion. :(

      Don't believe everything you read on Wikipedia.

    6. Re:Macedonians in Pakistan by seyyah · · Score: 1

      Well, I've been to Pakistan, and while you are right, "the culture is conservative Islamic (sic)", that is a general statement and doesn't apply to everyone in the country. There are plenty of Ismaili Shi'ite Muslims in Pakistan. I personally met Sikhs, Christians, Hindus and Taliban supporters. And the Kalash of Chitral happen to be polytheists. So what? It a big country. Lots of different people.
      Now this doesn't mean I believe that the Kalash are descendents of Macedonian soldiers, but their existence as non-Muslims is factual.

  21. 4,000 year old noodles. by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If proven, then the theory that Marco Polo brought spaghetti to Italy will finally have some competition. Were noodles, in fact, a Roman invention introduced to the Chinese?
    Unless the Romans were making noodles 4,000 years ago, there's no chance they invented noodles. Seeing as 4,000 year-old Chinese noodles have been found, it's pretty clear who invented noodles.
    --
    Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    1. Re:4,000 year old noodles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And still people doubt the existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster!

    2. Re:4,000 year old noodles. by burndive · · Score: 1

      Okay seriously, who the hell cares?

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    3. Re:4,000 year old noodles. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Let's go watch sports.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  22. Put your 50BC brain in gear by Howzer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems unclear only because you're not thinking with a 50BC brain -- you're thinking with a 2007AD brain.

    Your brain sees -- clearly -- a picture map of the world from space.

    A 50BC brain sees no such thing.

    To the well-educated 50BC brain, it would be self-evident that continuing to travel East will bring you to the edge of the world. Perhaps they planned to then circle around the "edge" and come back "up" the Nile -- something that's hinted at in the "Alexander" film that came out a couple of years back.

    Or perhaps they figured they'd circle "around" to the North, and come down "through" Gaul to get home.

    This is all assuming that such a "lost legion" did, in fact, exist -- something I personally feel is unlikely.

    1. Re:Put your 50BC brain in gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      something that's hinted at in the "Alexander" film that came out a couple of years back

      They had films in 52BC!?

    2. Re:Put your 50BC brain in gear by bogjobber · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you are thinking with a 2007AD brain that his been conditioned with a false sense of intellectual superiority and incorrect popular myths. Pythagoras first speculated that the Earth was round in ~550 BC. Both Plato and Aristotle (schooled in the Pythagorean writings) wrote that the Earth was round. Eratosthenes (~240 BC) came up with a decent estimate of the Earth's circumference. So, yes, the Romans knew that the Earth was in fact spherical. If there was anybody with a decent education (and if it was a whole legion, then there certainly was) they would not have thought the Earth was flat.

    3. Re:Put your 50BC brain in gear by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      And I believe the Egyptians were aware of this too, IIRC.

      And you are thinking with a 2007AD brain that his been conditioned with a false sense of intellectual superiority and incorrect popular myths.

      So much seems to have been forgotten in Europe during the Dark Ages - the question is: is there any proof the people of Spain and Italy believed in the Flat Earth Theory in 1492? Obviously Columbus had been aware of the 'ancient' studies and figured he could hack shipping. He apparently didn't know of the Norse or Egyptian travel to the Americas.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Put your 50BC brain in gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One account I read (and sorry that this is so second hand, as it was ages ago) was that the debate was not "flat vs. round" but "spherical vs. egg-shaped." The idea being that people didn't think Columbus was nuts because they held that the world was flat. Rather that everyone knew the world was round (easy to visualize on the ocean, for sure), but Columbus felt that it was much shorter around the East-West circumference than was the accepted at the time. Therefore, his scheme was that he should be able to sail west and get to India and cover the same distance as you would going East, only without pesky Africa to have to go around.

      So he sets sail, the requisite amount of time passes, still now land, and then eventually "oh, there it must be." Only it isn't.

      Sounded plausible to me at the time.

    5. Re:Put your 50BC brain in gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they didn't think the Earth was flat at Columbus' time. They even knew the approximate circumference of the Earth, which is why they (correctly) thought Columbus was a crackpot. He thought the Earth was a lot smaller, therefore it'd be a relatively short trip across the Atlantic to India. This was obviously wrong, but he got very lucky and there was something else there ("West Indies") so they didn't all die.

    6. Re:Put your 50BC brain in gear by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      That's a myth. The Greeks knew the world was a sphere and the Romans took their science from the Greeks.

      It might be that an uneducated soldier in 50 BC might think the world was flat...though that's complete conjecture. But a well-educated person in the Roman world in 50 BC would certainly know that the world was a sphere and that if you went far enough you'd return to where they were. Of course, that well-educated person would probably also know that the distance was far too far to travel on foot and since at the time the well-educated belief was of a euro-africa-asian landmass entirely surrounded by water, they'd also think it pointless to try on foot.

      There's been lots of mythologizing about Columbus about the ignorant scientists accusing Columbus of stupidity. The truth was not, however, that they thought the world was flat. The truth was that they thought that his estimation of the size of the Earth was too small. And, in fact, it was. Had the Americas not been there, Columbus would have starved before reaching asia.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    7. Re:Put your 50BC brain in gear by Howzer · · Score: 1

      Ah, where in my post did I say the world was flat?!

      I just said "edge of the world". I guess that was unclear. I should have said "edge of the big continent surrounded by water" -- but since the Romans believed that was the "world" that's what I said.

      So, nice attack on the straw man over there, but sorry, not much to do with what I actually posted.

  23. Liqian == Legion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wasn't in TFA, but did anyone else notice the resemblance between the name of the village, Liqian, and the latin word Legion (it was pronounced legio or legionis according to wikipedia)?
    Does it mean anything in Chinese?

    1. Re:Liqian == Legion? by Heian-794 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not sure how well Slashdot handles Chinese, but the characters are . ("Li" is the 'li' meaning 'beauty' on the right, with the horse radical on the left, and means 'black horse'. "Qian" is the 'gan' meaning 'dry' on the right, with the 'leather' radical on the left. The simplified form is this: .

      Given that it's only really the English pronunciation of "legion" that resembles the Chinese word (which is pronounced like English 'li-chien' would be; Wade-Giles romanization is li-ch'ien with aspirated ch), the resemblance is probably a coincidence. Then again, I have no idea how western Chinese people would pronounce those characters, so it may indeed be a corruption of "legion". I hope it is; that would be fascinating!

    2. Re:Liqian == Legion? by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      Obviously the Chinese characters aren't displaying as well as I'd been hoping. (To be even more accurate, on my screen they're not displaying at all.)

      Here's a Google search for the characters in Liqian: http://www.google.com/search?q=%E9%A9%AA%E9%9D%AC

      Here's a site which contains these characters (see the photo in the lower right; just above the Latin letters "Liqian": http://china-world.info/china28c.htm

      You should also be able to see them on this page: http://mujin.parfait.ne.jp/mujins/sanguo/geodic-10 .html#Riken

      Hopefully one or the other of these pages will show the Chinese characters for Liqian correctly. You may have to mess with the encoding on your browser to use Unicode or SJIS.

    3. Re:Liqian == Legion? by jamar0303 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Riken"? That last one uses Japanese kanji, which are slightly different from Chinese writing (uses a mix of Simplified, traditional, and some character forms unique to Japanese). For that matter, all 3 links give the traditional/Japanese characters for the name.
      This gives the Simplified characters for the name.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    4. Re:Liqian == Legion? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      /. filters out everything not contained in ISO-8859-1. Pretty annoying when talking about Euro prices, too.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:Liqian == Legion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that "legion" is the english form. In latin it is "legio, -onis", third declination, and it's pronouced very differently than in English because in latin, as well in any neo-latin language, the vowels aren't messed up.

    6. Re:Liqian == Legion? by nephridium · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thanks for that. After searching around a bit using the Chinese characters I could find quite an informative article for the Economist from just over two years ago describing the situation there.

      On my web-search for "Roman looking" Chinese I found this commented slideshow (flash) showing a little girl with blond hair and a local farmer with green eyes.

      Well, let's see what the DNA study will uncover.


      Btw - Liqian and "legion" does sound similar, but keep in mind that the original Latin pronunciation does differ quite a bit from the contemporary English (and even Italian) pronunciation.

      --


      And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    7. Re:Liqian == Legion? by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      Lamar, thanks for the catch. I hadn't noticed that all three of my links had the traditional characters.

  24. Fish scale by Magada · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If that part is true (about the chinese describing them as using a "fish scale formation, then yes, they were romans, but the fish-scale thing is not the testudo (+5 Overrated military formation of all time), but rather the standard way that maniples were ordered in a legion deployed to form a line of battle-a checkerboard pattern like this:

    # # #
      # # #
    # # #
    which indeeed would resemble the staggered pattern of fish scales.
    --
    Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    1. Re:Fish scale by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      the fish-scale thing is not the testudo (+5 Overrated military formation of all time), but rather the standard way that maniples were ordered in a legion deployed to form a line of battle
      With about 150 men, you'd be just about able to form one maniple. Which would look more like two blocks side by side.

      which indeeed would resemble the staggered pattern of fish scales.
      If you were in a helicopter.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Fish scale by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      If you were in a helicopter.
      <von daniken>Proof that the formations were given to the Romans by aliens, probably from the constellation Pisces!</von daniken>
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Fish scale by Magada · · Score: 1

      Or perched on a wall, maybe? :).

      Valid point re maniples, seeing as 150 is two slightly undersized centuriae but... it would make sense that, as cohorts were split into maniples when needed, a maniple would split into smaller units when needed (decuriae, maybe?).

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    4. Re:Fish scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Ghostface DID learn how to deal fishscale in Shaolin.

    5. Re:Fish scale by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      ...the testudo (+5 Overrated military formation of all time)...


      There's at least one case related in a Roman work about a siege where the defenders toppled a siege engine off the walls hoping to break a testudo that was attacking them. I don't know if it succeeded or not, but that doesn't sound like that bad a formation. I agree that it wasn't the be-all and end-all of formations, but it worked quite well when used properly. Probably it's best to think of it as the Roman equivalent of a tank with the same advantages and weak points.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    6. Re:Fish scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With about 150 men, you'd be just about able to form one maniple. Which would look more like two blocks side by side. According to the story, 150 was how many men were left after the battle and 10,000 was the number that were initially captured by the Persians, so presumably some number between 150 and 10,000 is how many were pressed into service against the Chinese.
    7. Re:Fish scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would make sense that, as cohorts were split into maniples when needed, a maniple would split into smaller units when needed (decuriae, maybe?).
      You still reach a limit. In Napoleonic warefare, you'd rarely see regular line companies deployed in the field individually.
      In the ancient Roman army, the smallest tactical unit was a century. There was a contubernium of 8 or 10 men, but IIRC it was only administrative.
  25. this is cool and all by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    but this is also the sort of story that we tend to never see a followup on.

    i'm not trying to be negative, but perhaps a motivator of sorts.

    1. Re:this is cool and all by nomadic · · Score: 1

      but this is also the sort of story that we tend to never see a followup on.

      Console yourself with the fact that we'll probably get 3 or 4 dupes of the story. Those are...sort of a followup.

  26. Still fresh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's the expiry date?

  27. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by arivanov · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not surprising.

    The outer Mongolia is the region to which every single major Eurasian human migration can be traced. Before DNA techniques, language techniques and historical references have been used to trace these migrations.

    Most of that has now been confirmed using DNA. There was a number of waves going as far back as the Dorian invasion which overthrew the bronze age greek civilisations and established what 500 years later became the golden age greece. This was followed by gotts, westgotts, barbarians, huns, bulgarians, etc. All of them displaced from outer mongolia a few centuries before they ended up in Europe.

    The early waves were speaking indo-european languages and with distinct caucasian appearance. The last ones (huns and pra-bulgarians) were speaking languages from the Turk language group and were of mongoloid appearance.

    So finding a blond or even a redhead in mongolia is not suprising. After all Chengis Khan was a redhead.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  28. Too bad... by DrYak · · Score: 2

    ...they left their Real ID papers back there in Rome.
    We wouldn't have to do all this DNA checking if they kept their Imperial ID cards with them...

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  29. Latin Joke by kernel_pat · · Score: 1

    "Mihi amo tu diuturnus, combibo quinque denario"

    1. Re:Latin Joke by kernel_pat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Essentially meaning "Me love you long time, SUKI SUKI five dolla" but the Roman equivalent

  30. Just a coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That "Liqian" is phonetically pronounced almost exactly like "legion," but with the accent on the first syllable.

  31. The lost kindom of Prester John by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Maybe Prester John was really in China? (Not unless he actually ended up in Utah or some other wacky idea...)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  32. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by Illserve · · Score: 1

    Meaning, the girl was a direct descendant of that woman who lived around 2,000 years ago.

    I'm confused by the emphasis on the word direct here. How could you be an indirect descendent of someone? Either you can trace a lineage path back to them or not.

    It's surprising that prominent genetic features like hair colour could survive so many generations of interbreeding with non blondes but I guess if that person was promiscuous enough, they started a broad enough tree that chance allowed the blonde gene to survive.

  33. Kerguelen... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Yeah, if a woman was along with all those lost men, she would have asked for directions! Yup... and given what we know about the navigational skills of the human female they would have ended up settling in the Kerguelen Archipelago instead of China.
    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  34. The other way round... by jzu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember an ambulance driver in France, near Chalons en Champagne, with distinctive asian features. Since he had a Russian name, I asked him once how his father looked like... but he smiled and told me his father looked Caucasian - OTOH his mother looked very much like himself. A fascinating explanation ensued: a Hun tribe had settled somewhere between Chalons and Troyes after the Battle of Catalaunic Fields in 451 instead of going back to Pannonia with the rest of Attila's army. They lived in a relatively isolated valley until recently, which kept their genes from being overly diluted. HLA groups are useful at detecting genotypes, and it seems theirs is clearly Asian.

    Now this is nearly unelievable because I know this area: mostly plains, lots of roads. Such a story seems unlikely to the casual listener; however, I did ask an Haematologist about it. He confirmed this story which is well-known in the field.

    1. Re:The other way round... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you give me some more information on this? I googled for "Battle of Catalaunic Fields", "Chalons en Champagne" hun, hunnic populations france etc etc, but I couldn't find any info. This is absolutely fascinating...

    2. Re:The other way round... by jzu · · Score: 1

      I couldn't find any information about it on the Web. I suppose an online library access would help since this is mostly research material, probably buried in expensive scientific publications.

      Usually, the best clues of foreign invasions are toponomic. For instance, quite a few French towns and villages are named "Allainville" and "Allaines" after Alans immigrants. Some of them, by the way, came with Attila's Alan/Goth/Hun confederation so a Hunnic settlement shouldn't be much of a surprise. What's baffling here is the ability to discriminate the genotype of a 1500 year-old small population through analysis of their blood - which is more or less an image, a projection of their DNA.

    3. Re:The other way round... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      turns out I was born in Châlons-en-Champagne (it was called Châlons-sur-Marne in the days) and I grew up in a village nearby.

      I've always been told as a kid that Attila did come in that city and established a camp around it. There is even a street named "rue du Camp d'Attila" (Attila's Campsite street), probably in memory of this.

      still, it's fascinating to see how little events like that get remembered in our days.

    4. Re:The other way round... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here, I reply to myself...
      This is what I found
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Chalons

      additionally, I tend to recall (don't quote me though) that the city Châlons gets it name from Catalaun.

      I think it went that way: Catalaun => Chaalaun => Châlons (or something like that).

  35. Movie plot! by ejtttje · · Score: 1

    but this is also the sort of story that we tend to never see a followup on.
    I think it sounds like it would make a cool movie actually... survival/war story (for the guys) ending up with a happy inter-cultural understanding love story (for the ladies) I claim a portion of the royalties! (hmm, I wonder if I can get a software patent on a movie plot... it's kind of the same idea, a series of actions to perform...)
  36. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by cbv · · Score: 1

    I'm confused by the emphasis on the word direct here. How could you be an indirect descendent of someone?

    Of course. Maybe I should have put the emphasis on 'was' instead.

    As far as I remember, the scientists were just looking for clues about the origins and where stunned when they realized that the girl was actually related to a 2,000 year old mummy they found (more or less) by accident.

  37. Oh come off it by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Just because you lose a commanding officer doesn't mean your escape route is suddenly cut off. Unless there was no second (or third or fourth) in command and the footsoldiers were little more than knuckle dragging morons who could barely tie their own shoelaces then they could have got out the same way they would if they had a commanding officer. And if they really were so inept they couldn't manage it what are the odds on them being successfull mercenaries that manage to walk 2000 miles to central china??

    1. Re:Oh come off it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look who's an expert on ancient military tactics, all of a sudden.

      Or you could shut the hell up, realising that you don't even know the specifics of the battle in question.

    2. Re:Oh come off it by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      One battle doesn't get an army lost for the rest of their lives. Get a clue Mr A.C Moron.

    3. Re:Oh come off it by thecolorofash · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, they were captured by the Parthians in the Battle of Carrhae 53BC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Carrhae/. Thereafter they were used as border guards against the chinese further east. There were certainly no easy escape routes if you were POW in those days ;-(

    4. Re:Oh come off it by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      One, it was hardly an army, morelike the defeated remnants of one. Second, it doesn't always pan out that the losing side has a nice easy line of retreat. Add to that the fact that Cannae was fought deep in enemy territory to start with, and it's more than likely the Romans would have had a lot of hostile forces between them and home. Since the Geneva Convention hadn't been invented then, they probably thought sod it and went the other way.


      Several reasons why the AC has more of a clue than you do.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  38. Some humans just like to travel, you know... by fantomas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just recently there have been stories in the UK papers about some DNA testing in the north east of England, in Yorkshire. They've found one place where a number of folk have DNA matching the same as one specific group in Sub-Saharan Africa, and this must have happened at least a few hundred years ago.

    My theory is humans just like to travel around a bit, or sometimes settle far from home because of economic or political necessity or benefit. Hey, we see it today, why not 2000 years ago?

    In the UK we've got Hadrian's Wall, big old wall the Romans built in the north of England. There's documented proof that soldiers from other parts of the Empire were stationed there, from north Africa, Greece, Spain, etc... Who's to say a few of them didn't taking a liking to the place and decide to settle, maybe met a local girl, got a bit of a good little business number going locally, that sort of thing?

    The idea of a bunch of soldiers going freelance in exchange for a load of money and ending up quite a long way from home (Romans in China) - well why not?

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

    I think they mean direct descendant as in you can trace the lineage directly back to that person. An indirect descendant (not sure if that's the proper term) can have DNA traits tracked back to a particular group of people, but maybe not back to a specific person.

    --
    Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
  41. Crassus' Ghost Legion by J05H · · Score: 1

    When Crassus was ejected from the Roman empire, for a failed coup, he took his legion east. They knew (from merchants) that a great empire lived on the other side of the hated Parthians, so they marched in a loop northeast and eventually became border guards for the Chinese emperor. It makes sense, they already knew how to fight the Persians and couldn't live anywhere near the Roman sphere.

    "Liqian" is supposedly "Roman" Sinosized.

    This made the news in 2005, when the walls and tombs were found:

    http://orbis-quintus.net/blog/?p=1700

    Josh

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    1. Re:Crassus' Ghost Legion by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      When Crassus was ejected from the Roman empire, for a failed coup...


      What failed coup? Crassus was the Governor of Syria and was killed when he invaded Parthia. There may have been a later general that was ejected as you write, but not Crassus!

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Crassus' Ghost Legion by J05H · · Score: 1

      I thought that Crassus and Pompeii were both banished. I was also under the impression that he had survived the journey through to China. Memory fails.

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    3. Re:Crassus' Ghost Legion by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      No, Crassus was killed by the Parthians. Pompey and Caesar fought a civil war (Documented by Caesar in his Commentaries.) with Pompey leading the forces of the Roman Senate, and thus, of the established order. Pompey lost and was assassinated by one of his followers.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  42. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by toddhisattva · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tocharians are the easternmost "Scotch-Irish" clan ;-)

    On a message board discussing the blonde and redhaired Chinese, somebody noted that there are a lot of them in Canada, but that their origin was not Tocharian or Scythian, it was L'Oreal!

  43. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by Xonstantine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The outer Mongolia is the region to which every single major Eurasian human migration can be traced. Before DNA techniques, language techniques and historical references have been used to trace these migrations.

    Most of that has now been confirmed using DNA. There was a number of waves going as far back as the Dorian invasion which overthrew the bronze age greek civilisations and established what 500 years later became the golden age greece. This was followed by gotts, westgotts, barbarians, huns, bulgarians, etc. All of them displaced from outer mongolia a few centuries before they ended up in Europe.


    Actually, no. There were lots of nomadic invasions that came from places other than the Mongolian plain. Most of the Germanic tribes that laid the Roman empire low came from Scandanavia. The Slavs that were the terror of the Balkans around 600 A.D. came from the Pripyet marshes.

    Plenty of nomadic invasions hailed from the Mongolian plain, however. The Scythians, the Sarmatians, the Alans, the Huns, the Turks, and the Mongols, to name a few.

  44. Actually ... by scotbot · · Score: 1

    C'mon, everyone knows spaghetti grows on trees.

  45. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by toddhisattva · · Score: 1

    Meaning, the girl was a direct descendant of that woman who lived around 2,000 years ago.
    The Secrets of the Dead episode you saw was not so definitive, showing that she was not a direct descendant but had a common ancestor with the buried "Amazon" warrior woman. So the "Amazon" woman's mom might have been the Little Blonde Girl's great*n grandmother.

    I was disappointed by the wording implying a more direct connection when none had been established.

    That there were "Caucasians" (using quotes even though Blumenbach may have been right) all over Asia is an established and quite interesting area of study.

    If I've read the linguist and genetics mail list archives correctly, the Sinitic peoples are themselves "split" from the Caucasian, in other (probably less accurate) words, a bunch of Caucasians crossed the Tien Shan/Altay ranges, the genetic bottleneck caused thereby accounting for the distintive features of the Sinitic peoples.

    Oh, what do I mean by "Blumenbach may have been right?" That a darker-complexioned folk with woolly hair got to the Caucasus, and "bleached out" as they adapted to living in valleys with less insolation than the flats (skin pigmentation in humans seeming to be driven by the need for vitamin D).

    This theory neatly accounts for the black Georgians of Herodotus. According to the legends Herodotus records, they were remnants of an expedition of a Pharoah Sesostris, "most manifestly are Egyptians." In the "Caucasians from Caucasus" theory, this dark-complexioned, woolly-haired folk in Georgia is simply the relict population which didn't bleach out.

    I am not providing many links, because those interested in the assertions of this post will be rewarded by doing their own research. Really. Get thee to a search engine and find out.

    Many cultures have legends about a place in or around Central Asia around which the world rotates: Shambala, Olmo Lungring, Mount Meru. The more Central Asian history I learn, the more it seems like World History does rotate around an axis with one pole in Central Asia and the other in Mesopotamia.

    IMPO, by far the most interesting theories regarding Central Asia are those of radio pioneer Reginald A. Fessenden. Of course something so old will have a lot of bad guesses, but what's amazing is what he got right - giant glacier lakes in Central Asia, the *outflow* of the Black Sea during the Ice Age, apples (and therefore the Hesperides) being from the east - and how he divined the information from the mythologies: Schleimannesque.
  46. That doesn't prove anything. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    It wasn't in TFA, but did anyone else notice the resemblance between the name of the village, Liqian, and the latin word Legion (it was pronounced legio or legionis according to wikipedia)?

    I'm sure somebody has, and right now they're engaging in silly speculation just like you. There's no lack of examples of pairs of words in widely separated or unrelated languages that have vaguely similar pronunciation and meaning (and the link in meaning you have in mind is very vague). Your reaction is just pareidolia and confirmation bias.

    Compare to the way historical linguists compare languages: they don't just put words next to each other and say "gee, don't they look similar," but rather, they state rules that describe a systematic sound correspondence between the core vocabularies of the languages in question ("in every place where a core word of language A contains a 'k' sound between two vowels, its proposed cognate in language B contains a hard 'g' sound").

    Also, 'Liquian' is a pinyin romanization of a modern Mandarin word, using a contemporary Beijing pronunciation of the words in questions. Now, I'm no sinologist, but I can tell you that you should not assume too quickly that the pronunciation of a word today reflects very closely the way it was pronounced 2,000 years ago.

    1. Re:That doesn't prove anything. by Grant_Watson · · Score: 1

      I doubt the GP was assuming anything-- he seems to just be offering it up as a possibility.

    2. Re:That doesn't prove anything. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      I doubt the GP was assuming anything-- he seems to just be offering it up as a possibility.

      I think the correct technical term for that is "pulling stuff out of his ass."

  47. IRAN by legonis · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Parthians, an empire occupying what is now Iran." Iran existed way before 53BC. Parthians, Persians and Medyans were all iranian tribes of that era. Parthians took over the country after 200 years of Greek's army power (Alexander the great invasion). From wikipedia.org : "The name Iran is a cognate of Aryan and literally means "Land of the Aryans." They started to call Iran Persia, after 553BC when Cyrus the great became the emperor. On the other hand, Iran is a term that used to refer to that land before the Achaemenian empire and during the Medyan dynasty.

  48. I stand corrected by Reverse+Gear · · Score: 1

    Thank you for posting this.

    It wasn't out of ill intend that I twisted the story to sound as if the romans were "happy mercenaries", to me that was also what the news sites I read about this gave me a bit of the impression that this was what had happened.
    I did not come upon this information in my (admittedly scarce) research for this posting, I am thankful for you bringing this up to me. I will at least correct my blog (no editing is allowed in /., good thing your comment already is modded +5).

  49. Python? by neveragain4181 · · Score: 1

    All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

    'Helped out' a village?

  50. Mod parent up by catman · · Score: 1

    Just in case parent isn't modded up, or doesn't log in to repost, here's what he wrote for the benefit of those who skip ACs. AFAIK it's dead right and should be pointed out very clearly!

    No, they didn't think the Earth was flat at Columbus' time. They even knew the approximate circumference of the Earth, which is why they (correctly) thought Columbus was a crackpot. He thought the Earth was a lot smaller, therefore it'd be a relatively short trip across the Atlantic to India. This was obviously wrong, but he got very lucky and there was something else there ("West Indies") so they didn't all die.

  51. God-damn Romans... by smithmc · · Score: 1

    ...knock down my city wall!

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  52. omg by Chutulu · · Score: 1

    Gu Meina, now six, was born with a shock of blonde hair. "We shaved it off a month after she was born, but it just grew back the same colour,"

    well duuuhhh ?

  53. Crassus's soldiers? by dmccarty · · Score: 1

    I was surprised from the comments here that no one mentioned Crassus or his defeat at Carrhae as possibilities, then I read TFA and it's right in the article itself!

    According to accounts of the battle, of a 30,000 strong force, 10,000 were killed, 10,000 survived and 10,000 were captured and either employed as slaves or mercenary labor:

    From http://www.unrv.com/fall-republic/battle-of-carrha e.php:

    In the end, the great bulk of the Roman army was hunted down and killed or captured. Nearly 20,000 were killed and another 10,000 captured. Of the original force, only about 5,000 men under Cassius, and the cavalry that departed early, managed to escape. The Parthians meanwhile, settled the Roman prisoners in an eastern territory called Sogdia. Interestingly, the Han Chinese later captured this area and the Roman transplants were likely among the first westerners to meet the Chinese directly.
    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  54. Damn Western History and Education by Delifisek · · Score: 1

    Same story another millenia...

    So what if that european genes trasferred from east ?

    Who is the Etrusk ?

    Western history and education to much biased for western culture...

    --
    [My english is better than most other people's Turkish, so please point out mistakes politely. Thank you.]
  55. BP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF does British Petroleum have to do with a calendar?

  56. 1.8m height attributed to the romans by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

    I am not sure if the height the guy mentions in the article can be attributed to the Romans. The romans weren't that tall. During the invasion of Britain, the average Roman soldier was about 5'6 at about 5x BC. Assuming that these ppl went to China around the same time, I would see their height staying relative to the chinese ppl there based on the food they eat and life style they lead.

    1. Re:1.8m height attributed to the romans by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      >I would see their height staying relative to the chinese ppl there based on the food they eat and life style they lead.

      Given what they made their pipes out of, what they sprinkled in their wine, and what just generally got in their food, I'll say that's pbunny.

  57. First they conquered part of Eurasia... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

    If you take into account that "Europeans" comprise many distinct groups, it's a bit hard to say that all "Europeans" came from one region in central Asia. I also wonder whether the distinction between Europe and Asia is really relevent when discussing genetic hisory. Perhaps Eurasia makes more sense.

    That said, I have read a theory that Celts came from a region in what is now China and crossed Siberia and Russia into Europe. Interestingly enough, they then went and invaded Rome. This was all before Rome got organised, and started invading other people, so maybe this story shows a full circle. Then again, maybe the genes existed in China well before the Romans arrived.

    It's also interesting to note that Australian Aborigines (I think all three racial groups) share the genetic trait of being the ability to have blue, green, or brown eyes and blonde, red, etc hair with caucasians. As far as I know, they are the only black skinned people who exhibited this before contact with Europeans. I'd be interested to know how this came about, whether the trait spread from Eurasia to Australia, or vice versa.

    --
    I don't therefore I'm not.
    1. Re:First they conquered part of Eurasia... by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      The theory that I believe is that the Australian Aborigines migrated from India. You'll notice that the South Indians are very distinct from the North Indians...Southern Indians have much darker skin and their language, Tamil, is vastly different to Hindi. Northern Indians tend to be a light brown and some are almost "white". My understanding/belief is that the Dravidians were occupying India, and slowly migrated across South-East Asia and into Australia. Meanwhile a bunch of people from the Middle-East wandered over to North India (speaking a variant of the Proto-Indo-European Language which later became Sanksrit) and pushed the Dravidians down further South.

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  58. Way home blocked by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 1

    What is that supposed to mean? Did they lose a battle and flee to china rather than facing their superiors? Did they lose their sense of direction? (How can you mistake east for west?)

    Look at a map. If they were captured by the Parthians and after a period of captivity in Parthia, if they escaped to the east or were released/expelled/sold to the east, the way back home to Rome in the west would have been blocked by the Indian Ocean to the south, Parthia itself (Iran) in the center, and the Caspian Sea and the Hun Empire to the north. I can easily imagine them deciding to follow Alexander the Great's legacy and move eastward.

  59. Re:Not the first indication of Europeans in China. by XantheKnight · · Score: 1

    Actually, that is just one theory about the Dorian invasion. In fact, there isn't that much solidly known about the identity, ethnic or otherwise, of the Dorians.

  60. I love DNA testing by bigjarom · · Score: 1

    I grew up my whole life thinking that American Indians were descended from Hebrews who arrived in America in 600 BC. And by 'Native Americans' I mean Polynesians, Inuit, and everyone else native to North and South America and the Pacific Islands (as long as they weren't too black of course). Then I read a story on the Internet about DNA research compiled by Simon Southerton. Guess What? His research confirmed what common sense, linguistic, and archaeological evidence also suggested: that Native Americans came from Asia. As sad as it is, that was the most life-changing experience I've had so far.

  61. Romans in China by Oshkoshjohn · · Score: 1

    Ah yes. . .the XI Expeditionary Legion was first led by Biggus Dickus, and after his death, by Naughtius Maximus.

    --
    Goddamned kids! Get off my lawn!
  62. Obviously, by WhatDoIKnow · · Score: 1

    descendants of these war-mongering westerners were responsible for development and testing of the Chinese anti-satellite weapon.

    :wq

  63. Or maybe not so corrected after all by Reverse+Gear · · Score: 1

    As a comment on my blog also points out the pdf linked to above is not all that scientific, for example it does not cite it's sources.

    I have not read this through yet but I would suggest that anyone who is genuinely interested in this subject should take a closer look at this pdf which sure does look much more worked through and authoritative on the subject.