Slashdot Mirror


User: AndroidCat

AndroidCat's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7,894
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7,894

  1. Re:I have a solution on Technology for Mapping the Underground? · · Score: 1
    It would be neat to have a software test-bench for this. Something like a crobots or Robocode engine that allows maps to be used and "equipment" to be added to the bot.

    Has anyone done anything like this? I'd think that it would be an obvious application. (Now that I've thought of it. :^) Perhaps the "bots shooting each other" was too neat an idea?

  2. Re:Mapping sewers. on Technology for Mapping the Underground? · · Score: 1
    Clean bottom storm pipes are almost always safe.

    But they are called storm pipes for a reason -- Always check the weather forecast before exploring. And even if you are covertly exploring, make sure someone knows where you are and your timetable. (Obvious perhaps, but safety first!)

  3. What a strange analogy! on William Gibson on Blogging · · Score: 3, Funny
    the ecology of being a novelist

    Does that mean the process of being a novelist involves eating your way up the food-chain until you either die or are excreted back to the bottom? :^)

  4. Re:Wrong way. on Distributed Computing Attacking SARS · · Score: 1

    Any truth to the rumour that there's a sequence near the end that reads "477 UR B453-P41R5"? Mother Nature is a harsh h4x0r...

  5. Re:A Star Trek "First"? on Enterprise Getting New Aliens, Hairdos, Weapons · · Score: 2, Funny
    I totally agree with you that including the borg into the preqel series would ruin it.

    Don't worry, they'll only meet Pakkled drones. "We need things to make us go. Resistance is .. a pretty hard word."

  6. Re:Microsoft's fault on The Costs of Patching · · Score: 0, Troll

    How is the parent a troll? I always hated installing a new version of Visual C++ (hot off the press from MS) because I knew that I would immediately have to download 80M+ patches. (And another set a few weeks later.) And then there's the issue making sure each developer's machine has the same set of patches. (And don't get me going about mismatched "system" DLLs at client sites.)

  7. Re:spam threatens brodcasters revenue model on Brad Templeton On Spam's Silver Anniversary · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Perhaps, but when laws against spam are being created, you have to keep your eye on the pea under those shells. Always look at what they define as spam. Sharp's Corollary to Rule #1: Spammers attempt to re-define "spamming" as that which they do not do.

    Any bets that political spam by "responsible" organizations isn't defined as spam? The DMA lobby also makes sure that their "targeted marketing" isn't spam either.

  8. Re:It's in the can, dude... on Brad Templeton On Spam's Silver Anniversary · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You have to be careful when saying "spammers". There's the spammers like Al Ralsky, who have no political pull, and then there's the Direct Media Advertising lobby which does. What's the difference? The DMA defines what they do as "not spam".

    The DMA wants laws that outlaw the penis-pill spammers, while preserving the utility of your inbox as an advertising medium for their targeted important message, and outlaw any filtering/blocking of that message. (In other words, they want to allow their main-sleeze spam. :^)

  9. Re:Interesting discussion involving Stallman and s on Brad Templeton On Spam's Silver Anniversary · · Score: 1

    Is he still looking for a GNU/girlfriend?

  10. Re:Wrong on Brad Templeton On Spam's Silver Anniversary · · Score: 1
    but then another idiot might come along

    Might? I'm sure the supply of idiots is vast, if not limitless. (And if they run out, I'm sure that no one will complain when they chop the last one down.)

  11. Re:10 points! on Brad Templeton On Spam's Silver Anniversary · · Score: 1

    What's the current exchange rate of points to quatloos?

  12. McDonalds Spam on Brad Templeton On Spam's Silver Anniversary · · Score: 1

    Is McDonalds in Hawaii still serving Spam for breakfast? That sounds like a good meal to start the day! (In Canada they added "heathy" greenie stuff to their menu. If I wanted healthy, I doubt I'd eat there to start with. Come to think of it, I don't.)

  13. Re:Public Report on 2002 US Wiretap Report · · Score: 1

    Until the Patriot Act, the NSA weren't supposed to listen in on Americans, but they bent that rule quite a bit. And they did cut a deals where they got friendly agencies of other countries to return favours by doing it for them. (At least the was the situation cira The Puzzle Palace.)

  14. How Ironic! on New Ultra-Intrusive Pop-up Ads Introduced · · Score: 1

    The story web page had two "Action Cancelled" panels. I guess they were fron DoubleClick or something? (Routes to 0.0.0.0 here.)

  15. Re:Public Report on 2002 US Wiretap Report · · Score: 1

    They aren't allowed to do domestic operations. Hey, stop laughing!

  16. Re:Use on railroads on Barcodes: The Number of the Beast · · Score: 1
    I certainly didn't expect 6 mods used on that post. It was just a brain-fart of past memories. Although, it was perhaps my first awakening to the idea that if you have this huge system for routing things and you tell it a simple lie, you can control it. Ironic if my hacker roots have railroad beginings. (MIT TMRC ref.)

    Hmm, hacking (dark side, evil!) UPC codes by applying your own sticker to the product? That would be wrong.

    And I wonder what the railroad "ping" time is to the left-coast these days?

  17. Re:Security features on Slashback: Hawash, Monomania, Rocketships · · Score: 1
    Couldn't be. Besides resolving to colo110a.ash01.pccwbtn.net, that IP address was probably on the CD some spammer offered me which had "over 30 million" IP addresses on it. (For the slow at brain, that was IP addresses, not email addresses. 4 bytes, do the math.)

    Dear [0.0.0.1] I am contacting you with a confidential offer...

  18. Re:Security features on Slashback: Hawash, Monomania, Rocketships · · Score: 1

    I see Win98 from here. I 0wn3z that box, crappy security! I'm still having no joy probing 0.0.0.0 which is the home server of the Cabal [tinc].

  19. Re:Gray Code on Barcodes: The Number of the Beast · · Score: 1
    The idea of Gray code is that only one bit changes at a time. I believe it was originally designed for conductive contact brushes. You didn't want a brief spike when going from 011 to 100 and getting 110 or 101.

    (I know you got it, I'm just just explaining why Gray code exists.)

  20. Barcode Books on Barcodes: The Number of the Beast · · Score: 1
    I always thought those PaperByte books with barcode program listings were cute. (I still have my BASEX compiler one.) Of course, nobody had readers back then, and I had to enter 8k in hex, with only 3 keying errors, we had it rough...

    Couldn't find it, I wanted to estimate the size of a Linux distro in Paperbyte form. Ow!

  21. Re:so uh... cool or not? on Barcodes: The Number of the Beast · · Score: 1

    I've read that a nuclear-armed sidecar creates politeness. (Perhaps we should test the phrase "A [nuclear] armed society is a polite society"? :^)

  22. Re:Use on railroads on Barcodes: The Number of the Beast · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Back in school, when they took us on a field trip where railway people explained the switching yard and routing system for cars, I always liked the idea of having my own (disgused) car and hacking the system by changing the code on the side.

    This was before I'd seen a computer. :^)

  23. Re:so uh... cool or not? on Barcodes: The Number of the Beast · · Score: 1

    Or you could be like this guy: Man puts faith in name tag After all, not everyone carries a barcode reader.

  24. Re:It's not the signals... on Wireless Computing and Airplanes? · · Score: 1
    It's all part of a plot to make airline magazines seem interesting. It failed. :^P

    But serious, I wonder how planes cope when the aurora kicks up during a Great Circle route? Now there's RFI!

  25. Re:A network is secure if... on Securing Your Network? · · Score: 1
    Spammers don't want your information. They just want open proxies and your netconnection (until you get blocked/your ISP cuts you off). And then there's the worms.

    Protecting your information is good, but you also have to be a good net neighbour.