That's a very rough approximation, and besides that, noone ever claimed that the engine was somehow dangerous to start with... A full tank of gas, even though it cannot ignite unless exposed to air (which isn't unlikely given a crash), stores way more energy than the battery of a gasoline car. An almost-empty tank of gas, however, doesn't have that much energy anymore, but will readily explode if somehow ignited.
The vehicle carries energy. It's pretty much irrelevant whether that energy is stored as gasoline or inside a huge battery -- whenever there is a large amount of energy around, there is the potential of shit igniting.
It's easy, and you can even leverage XML for it:
For every blot, just add a line like this to the description: <ink color="red" radius="10" pos_x="43" pos_y="131"/>
This has the additional advantage of being machine-readable....;)
What a surprise. Either you didn't read my post, or you didn't understand what it implies. OpenRC is a reimplementation of the BSD RC-system. Designed to sanitize the various substandard init systems commonly used with Linux. Dropping the (very well-engineered) original and using OpenRC would be a ridiculous thing to do on a BSD.
Onto a totally different topic: we're getting to release numbers where
I have to take off my socks to count that high again. I'm ok with
3., but I don't want us to get to the kinds of crazy
numbers we had in the 2.x series, so at some point we're going to cut
over from 3.x to 4.x, just to keep the numbers small and easy to
remember. We're not there yet, but I would actually prefer to not go
into the twenties, so I can see it happening in a year or so, and
we'll have 4.0 follow 3.19 or something like that.
Not sure how that reminds you of rapid-release firefox-style...
I have a Harley with a five speed transmission. I've heard of a six speed upgrade, but thought those were just for bragging rights, as nobody would ever really need a sixth gear. And then I visited Texas. Now I'm saving up for one.
In any case, a sixth gear makes sense for economical i.e. gas-saving reasons.
No. Independent of how long it takes for that information to reach us, what we receive is the original information so we do watch them die off. Right now (i.e. then).
People, we desperately need to break out of the conceptual straightjacket of three dimensions. If only scientists would listen to me and read the thousands of letters that I have sent to NASAR, Bill Gates, Bill O'Reilly, Bill Clinton, and other respected Schientists, they would have realized that you can get inside solid objects with ease just by travelling in the fourth dimentian. This is something I do on a regular basis, and have done since I was six years old. Once you learn it, it's like riding a bike, you can't get off it ever!
Slashdot Mirror
horricheap?
came here to say that.
That's a very rough approximation, and besides that, noone ever claimed that the engine was somehow dangerous to start with... A full tank of gas, even though it cannot ignite unless exposed to air (which isn't unlikely given a crash), stores way more energy than the battery of a gasoline car. An almost-empty tank of gas, however, doesn't have that much energy anymore, but will readily explode if somehow ignited.
You're an idiot.
Best wishes anyway,
-Energy
The vehicle carries energy. It's pretty much irrelevant whether that energy is stored as gasoline or inside a huge battery -- whenever there is a large amount of energy around, there is the potential of shit igniting.
It's easy, and you can even leverage XML for it: />
For every blot, just add a line like this to the description:
<ink color="red" radius="10" pos_x="43" pos_y="131"
This has the additional advantage of being machine-readable....;)
plan9 is the successor of unix, and unix isn't broken by any gnu crap by definition. nice try, though.
Designed to sanitize the various [...]
Well, that should of course read: Designed to sanitize the insane situation which arose due to the various [...]
none of the bsds use it
What a surprise.
Either you didn't read my post, or you didn't understand what it implies. OpenRC is a reimplementation of the BSD RC-system. Designed to sanitize the various substandard init systems commonly used with Linux. Dropping the (very well-engineered) original and using OpenRC would be a ridiculous thing to do on a BSD.
Use a BSD instead of reimplementing half of it in Linux. Help spread the word!
Wait. No. Would someome please think of the children?!
Wait, I /am/ a techie, you insensitive clod. Take it back or phear my HTML programming skills.
Onto a totally different topic: we're getting to release numbers where I have to take off my socks to count that high again. I'm ok with 3., but I don't want us to get to the kinds of crazy numbers we had in the 2.x series, so at some point we're going to cut over from 3.x to 4.x, just to keep the numbers small and easy to remember. We're not there yet, but I would actually prefer to not go into the twenties, so I can see it happening in a year or so, and we'll have 4.0 follow 3.19 or something like that.
Not sure how that reminds you of rapid-release firefox-style...
Get laid, bro.
obviously you have replied to the wrong post
Dear fanboy, take a look at what ISPs run. No, it's not OpenBSD, but it sure as hell isn't Lunix* either
(*) The losers' unix
welcome our new, autonomously sand hauling overlords [which are driven by a computer]
I have a Harley with a five speed transmission. I've heard of a six speed upgrade, but thought those were just for bragging rights, as nobody would ever really need a sixth gear. And then I visited Texas. Now I'm saving up for one.
In any case, a sixth gear makes sense for economical i.e. gas-saving reasons.
security guards are fucking people too
There's the problem. Just stop them from reproducing and the whole matter solves itself.
No. Independent of how long it takes for that information to reach us, what we receive is the original information so we do watch them die off. Right now (i.e. then).
bitch, please.
Have they considiered that maybe they're not seeing it because it's just not there?
is a theory.
Perhaps you were mistaking the word Theory for something else?
but..but..ze games r so awsm! ZE GRAPHICS!!!!1
People, we desperately need to break out of the conceptual straightjacket of three dimensions. If only scientists would listen to me and read the thousands of letters that I have sent to NASAR, Bill Gates, Bill O'Reilly, Bill Clinton, and other respected Schientists, they would have realized that you can get inside solid objects with ease just by travelling in the fourth dimentian. This is something I do on a regular basis, and have done since I was six years old. Once you learn it, it's like riding a bike, you can't get off it ever!
Until here, i was all like "haha, yeah."
Laura, I love you!
Well, now you remind me of this guy.
Reading the article? On /.? Ridiculous.