Slashdot Mirror
Gunman Opens Fire At LAX
McGruber tips news that today at 9:30AM PST, a man removed an assault rifle from a bag at Los Angeles International Airport and opened fire. The shooter moved into the screening area, and then further into the terminal. One TSA agent was killed; roughly six more people were injured. The gunman was a ticketed passenger. (Early reports suggested he worked for the TSA — this does not seem to be the case.) Police engaged him in gunfire, and he's now in custody. His motive is unknown at this time.
Some TSA officer obviously handled his jibblets a little too roughly.
Just what we need, now we'll have a security checkpoint before our security checkpoint to prevent you from bringing a gun into the security checkpoint.
Turtles all the way down...
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
And, since the gunman used a rifle, all rifles will be banned or limited to 3-round magazines, and the homosexual liberals and their whining will once again set the direction of this state.
-- Ethanol-fueled
Totally.
is one pissed-off TSA worker. No more f'in' around with those folks!
Whatever his deeper motive is, it's all too likely to be whitewashed.
A gunman armed with a high-powered rifle
What qualifies as high power now a days?
A leader of the union representing TSA officers deplored the incident.
i agree it is deplorable... and so is the TSA.
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
Collateral damage is always sad.
How is this news for nerds?
Article summary sucks. It wasn't an assault rifle, it was just a rifle. Likely a self-loading rifle, from pictures looks to be a varmint-type AR-15.
Looks like some sociopath finally noticed that a slow security checkpoint just means there's an easy crowd in an unsecured area.
What little empathy I can muster for anyone in LA (I have my reasons) goes to the 6(+- reporter error) injured and the family of the TSA grunt. He probably wasn't even one of the thugs, and his death will be used to increase the brutality of those who have abandoned all respect for the populace who just wants to ride uncomfortable chairs to a far-away destination.
My congratulations on the Police who did the difficult task of taking this man alive.
Just one to many gropes to this persons nether regions.
There tends to be much confusion right after events like these. Give it time.
I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
How many years have people been complaining that the only the thing the long lines at the screening areas do is make for a target rich environment? Attacking waiting points for security lines is a time honored practice in some parts of the world, the only surprising thing is that it took this long for it to occur here.
Security theater isn't just an inconvenience, it's a security risk in and of itself. I used to travel for a living and I have easily seen times in major airports where there were thousands of people queued up to go through the security checkpoints. It's a target rich environment where you can't miss for trying in some airports.
It's time to end security theater and demand real security.
> Looks like some sociopath finally noticed that a slow security checkpoint just means there's an easy
>crowd in an unsecured area.
Maybe they should put a security checkppoint in front of the line to protect the people in the line?
> What little empathy I can muster for anyone in LA
I just take comfort in knowing how nice Arizona bay is going to be.
"I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
a man removed an assault rifle from a bag at Los Angeles International Airport and opened fire.
Assault rifles are illegal in California; therefore this could never have happened!
That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
I'm glad it's only six. It's really hard to believe there weren't more. A guy with an assault weapon aimin' to misbehave at a busy airport terminal? You'd think there would be dozens dead and many more injured.
So he is shooting at people and has already killed one TSA officer. Why even try to take him alive? If there is ever a justification for shoot first and ask questions later, this is it. Now we'll have to pay for his room and board and legal fees for years to come.
That guy exercised the *shit* out of his second amendment rights. It's too bad Thomas Jefferson isn't around to high five him.
Whenever I think, "News for nerds" I'm not really thinking about shooting people.
DHS wants more funding, so they told this man "You do this or we kill everyone you know in the slowest, most painful way that no one will ever hear about"
"When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
How long before Alex Jones starts claiming this was a false flag operation?
People want guns, not innocent people getting slaughtered.
A man could easily injure more than 6 people with a simple chef's knife, baseball bat, large flashlight, sharpened pencils, etc.
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
... he didn't use a phaser, go the fuck away.
Really? +4? That's despicable, security guards are fucking people too. Or is this some kind of sick justice for you and those who up-moderated you? How can you justify this an consider yourself 'people'? If a gunman mowed down a courtroom during a tech-giant patent trial, would you eschew any sympathy for the lawyers who died too? Not liking the TSA is one thing, but implying a random person deserved to be fatally shot by a crazed gunman at an airport is sociopathic.
Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
You're a dick. That's all.
I know that Istanbul (IST) has almost curbside chechpoints.
Having to pull my netbook just inside the door when leaving was not expected. After that, my status gets me into the "special handling" lines so very little extra hassles happen.
Still, security bottlenecks are a terrible waste - security theatre.
Well, if you need to identify something deplorable, may as well ask the experts.
In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
Murricans shooting eachother again
>News for Nerds
ha
An assault rifle, by definition is a machine gun. The gun used at LAX wasn't (as best we can tell from the available information). So the first sentence in the summary is inaccurate.
There's speculation, based on a photo on Twitter that the rifle is a Ruger Mini-14, in which case it may not have qualified as an "assault weapon" as defined by Federal Law. Under Feinstein's last [failed] assault weapon ban, the Ruger Mini-14 with a collapsible stock was banned, but the other Mini-14's were ok. It would depend on whether or not the stock folds/collapses.
Under California law, the pistol grip, and ability to accept a detachable magazine are sufficient to classify it as an "assault weapon."
Looks like high capacity magazines were used, although they may have had inserts to render them legal (i.e. limit them to 10 rounds). If they are large capacity and he owned them before 2000, they're legal. Otherwise they would only be legal if they were limited to 10 rounds (or fewer).
We can say with high confidence that a semi-automatic rifle was used. Under the previous Federal assault weapon ban, and the more recent failed Federal effort, this rifle may or may not have been considered an "assault weapon." Under California law this rifle is an assault weapon. The magazines may or may not have been legal.
There are many reasons why this fellow started to shoot people. Given how terrible service is on airlines these days in "cattle class", long lines, TSA agents who want to "touch my junk" (the pedophile who touched mine when I was a kid was enough), late flights, no-fly lists, and more horrors, it's no wonder that this guy goes nuts. He's probably a frequent flier on United.
It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
Indeed. My bet is that it was not an assault rifle at all. Just a scary looking firearm. Of course all scary looking firearms are branded by news outlets as being assault rifles these days.
It leads me to believe the guy didn't go in with the intention of killing as many innocent people as possible. There was a clear motive and plan IMO. He could have easily dropped dozens of people at a checkpoint if he wanted.
Amen.
Probably a /. Snowden obsessed troll - Paul Ciancia
If you want to argue against gun control, be my guest. But please, stop using this fucking awful argument. I could kill dozens of people in a few seconds with an assault rifle.
If you know of a knife/bat/flashlight I can accomplish this with, I would love to own it.
There tends to be much confusion right after events like these. Give it time.
Son, wisdom like you express above isn't welcome around here,
because we like to make irrational stupid comments rather than
actually think things through. Of course this is an idiotic way to discuss
things but that is the way Slashdot regulars do things.
How did he have a gun in the airport?
Guns are banned there, the sign CLEARLY says so.
I mean, that's why pretty much nobody else was armed, right?
-Styopa
Apparently; Tory Belleci from MYTHBUSTERS was there, and called in to CNN not that long after the incident was being covered by the network. Not sure if other Mythbusters were there also as I couldn't hear the entire conversation (TV is on low at work).
So, could be an interesting next season???
If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
Good thing PRISM is around to find these people before they commit these acts!
You're a dick. That's all.
No and you want to know whay ? Because feeling sorry time and time again doesn't fix the problem. Every time a tragedy like this occurs, we hear people being sorry, politicians shedding crocodile tears and then what ? Nothing changes because Americans and the NRA are so in love with their weapons that they blame everything EXCEPT guns. So we put the blame on films, we put the blame on videogames, we put the blame on sex, we put the blame on hocus pocus etc... But we never have the political resolve to fix the real cause of these massacres. The freely available guns in this country.
Courtesy of the fucking second amendment.
America is a country of guns with all it entails. Deal with it.
Hey, the GOP has offered EXACTLY the same regarding Obamacare -- they want to get rid of it, but have offered no replacement, no alternative. Apparently, the only thing they want is for us to go back to the way things were, where you were denied coverage unless you were exceedingly healthy.
If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
That's despicable, security guards are fucking people too.
People who are made out of garbage are still technically human, so perhaps you're right about that.
With that said, there is the possibility that it was a joke, and I found it rather funny, despise what some people might say.
So we put the blame on films, we put the blame on videogames, we put the blame on sex, we put the blame on hocus pocus etc
You forgot to mention that we put the blame on guns.
Ignorance is a choice
Several "mass stabbings" have happened in the past couple of years. When people are tightly packed, this doesn't require a ninja, just a kitchen knife.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
Sorry, but I can't really get sad over a jackboot thug groper getting the bullet. It's the price you pay for doing the job. Stop groping me and making me walk through cancer-causing nudie scanners and I might get some sympathy. This like crying over a guard of a concentration camp getting shot. Don't have the tears to waste.
... the NEW Intel on this? If they are tapping everything they sure aren't finding the signal in the noise.
Silence is a state of mime.
People want guns, not innocent people getting slaughtered.
You can't have one without the other I'm afraid.
Have you realised most of these massacres are carried out by law abiding citizens that one day simply went crazy ? Cut the weapon supply and you can fix most of this problem.
The TSA is a volunteer service. I have just slightly more sympathy for them than the "fucking people too" who joined the SS. But of course there's no excuse for shooting at them - you never know where those bullets might end up; you'll likely hurt someone nearby!
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
What!? Now lawyers are people too?
And to them, all guns are scary, Therefore all guns are assault weapons.
etc.
Mass stabbing: Many were injured today...
Mass shooting: Many were killed today...
security guards are fucking people too
There's the problem. Just stop them from reproducing and the whole matter solves itself.
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
You could, yes. But that's never what you see happening, incidentally.
For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
Gee, and you'd think any job would be better than a cashier McDonalds in this economy.
You can't have one without the other I'm afraid.
But our desires remain the same; people don't want others to be slaughtered. Not feeling sympathy for innocent people being killed just because people want the freedom to own guns is just silly.
No, that's a myth. A stab wound from a (kitchen-sized) knife typically does more damage than a bullet, at least for torso wounds. And the knife never runs out of ammo. Whether shot or stabbed in the torso, your survival is more about how long it takes you to medical care, either way you're bleeding to death internally unless you get help soon.
There's a big difference when people are spread out, or when they might fight back, but when it's a bunch of people tightly packed and disarmed, a knife is sadly just as deadly.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
Do you need to see a wine list of all the people that you, too, can't stomach to consider as "people", to remind you of how wrong you're being? Or would you prefer to be treated as a person?
"Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
. . . so here's a security checkpoint for your security checkpoint.
But by the same token, we shouldn't let you own it, now should we?
It could be worse. They could have had to work for Dice.com.
I can't see how working on the very-bottom rung of America's admittedly bad domestic security apparatus disqualifies one for personhood. I'm doubt this TSA officer has killed any innocent people, likely a prerequisite for inclusion on my wine list if I had one.
Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
The gunman is also a person and was shot too, yet you probably wouldn't have objected to a joke at his expense. Bin Laden was a person and yet there was open celebrating in the streets when he was killed. It's all about degrees of evil and where you draw the line. Not everyone agrees to what degree specific people are evil and where you draw the deference line.
Speaking of awful arguments...
No, you couldn't. Well, maybe if they were all clustered around a barrel of highly-volatile explosives like in a video game, but otherwise no.
Stainless steel knives are a bitch to keep sharp.
Apparently, Mythbusters' presenters Grant Imahara and Tory Belleci were inside LAX when this happened. From the Mythbusters FB page: "Grant and Tory were present in Terminal 3 at Los Angeles International Airport at the time of today's shooting incident. Both were en route to Delaware for the filming of 'Punkin Chunkin'. Grant and Tory are safe and being rerouted." /Stolzy
I want to get drunk, but I don't want a hangover.
I want to stuff myself immobile, but I don't want to get fat.
I want to screw anything with a pulse, but I don't want to get a hurty-hurty on my wee-wee.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
This is one case where Gun control laws would actually be highly beneficial, as nobody is allowed to bring a weapon into an airport, so the self defense argument falls apart.
Since we've had gun control laws here in AU, such events have become not-so-common
I want to get drunk, but I don't want a hangover.
And you can feel crappy when you do get a hangover, despise your wishes. Look at his comment; he basically said that people shouldn't feel sympathy for the victims simply because many people want the freedom to own guns. Your comment is rather irrelevant to the one you replied to, when put in context.
If you are trying to kill a lot of people, use bombs, not guns.
"Cause" does not mean what you think it does.
This is one of those stories where non-Americans sit back and watch, gobsmacked, as American /.ers rant on about gun-ownership, utterly unaware of what barking lunatics they all sound like.
You guys have a massive cultural blind-spot when it comes to this stuff. It's incredible.
It's a cat and mouse game and unfortunately the TSA isn't going to win
Oh ye of little faith - the TSA can and will use their ineptness as justification that we need *more TSA*.
Expect it. The only valid purpose of the TSA is to grow until life is unbearable. And then grow further.
This madness will only stop once we see the TSA (and the corrupt politicians and soulless equipment suppliers who create/feed it) as the terrorists who are bent on destroying our freedoms.
Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
security guards are fucking people too.
They sure are. Really fucking them.
... just like Sandy Hooknose, the Aurora Theatre 'shootings', 9/11, the 'holocaust', etc.etc.
More Jew lies, designed to keep you as their slaves.
Cut the weapon supply and you can fix most of this problem.
So after Timothy McVeigh blew up the federal building in Oklahoma City, can we assume your solution to preventing that from happening again was to ban all yellow rental trucks and fertilizer ?
If you know of a knife/bat/flashlight I can accomplish this with, I would love to own it.
May I ask why or would that just make you angry?
Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
Not liking the TSA is one thing, but implying a random person deserved to be fatally shot by a crazed gunman at an airport is sociopathic.
A TSA officer is not a 'random' person. And I think most of them do deserve it. Just my opinion of course.
Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
It's funny because people who get a decent paying job where bureaucrats want them to touch strangers' junk stop being people. It has nothing to do with the bureaucrats and the people who think security theater works.
Oh, I think those bureaucrats and the people who support this nonsense are garbage as well.
But you can't remove the blame from the people who actually violate people's rights. "I was just doing my job" is no excuse.
Ignorance is a choice
Why does this offend you so much? Most people consider AR-15s Assault rifles right or wrong. I suppose we should be glad he didn't have the full auto military version but I really don't get your outrage.
Blaming the news for reporting that he used an Assault rifle when most people likely agree the AR-15 falls within that common definition makes no sense. It's frankly unbelievable that you are more bothered out the term "Assault rifle" being mentioned vs the actual shooting. I'm sure the family of the murdered will be comforted by the fact it wasn't an "Assault" rifle and "only" an AR-15 that killed him.
If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
Nearly 150 million Americans have exactly that. Therefore, you're completely wrong.
It doesn't seem like it's that unusual to be shot and live. You hear about people surviving multiple gunshot wounds all the time on the news.
People aren't quite as easy to kill as movies make it out to be (or for that matter quite as durable as they make action heroes look).
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
It sounds like the only people who were shot were TSA agents, so he may have been passing on a bunch of people that would have been targets for a "kill as many people as I can" type.
Comments like this scare the piss out of me. Any time a person justifies murder as a response for the injustice that the TSA represents we have all taken a step closer to a real nightmare of armed revolution. The government is broken and our rights are constantly under attack, they have been since the start, but it was set up in a way to give us a peaceful means to change it. Some suggested reading:
Shake Hands With the Devil
You might learn how close we always are to a world where the neighbors that put Halloween candy in my daughter's bag this evening could kill her with a machete next year. All it takes is fear and the ability to view other people as non-human. You're at least half way there.
Glad they outlawed "assault rifles" in LA. Else this could have been a lot worse.
Another cretin who took my comment seriously. It is obvious that TSA agents are people; I just think that they're rather slimy people. If just that much scares the piss out of you, then you're rather oversensitive, I think.
Ignorance is a choice
It's actually very easy to believe there wasn't more. Consider this.
The weapon that guy used is almost certainly semi-automatic, meaning one shot at a time (if you think that "assault weapon" means some kind of bullet hose where you just squeeze and hold the trigger and wave the barrel, then you've been reading too much HuffPo).
Since it is an AR, it is reasonable to assume the most common caliber, .223/5.56. That is not a particularly powerful caliber - it is banned for deer hunting in most states because of a low likelihood of a one-shot drop; meaning that, unless an accurate hit at some vital organ is achieved, it is more likely to wound than to kill, and the wounds are not as messy as your typical medium-caliber (.308) hunting rifle or shotgun would produce.
Furthermore, this being a TSA security checkpoint, there was more than one armed guard at the scene in immediate vicinity, who'd start acting as soon as they noticed him taking out the rifle (it's not exactly an inconspicuous thing!), so the guy really had very little time to pull off those shots before he was a target himself. So the most likely scenario is that he managed to take about a dozen fast and very inaccurate shots, only half of which actually hit anyone, and mostly in random locations.
Attempting to compare the US to any other country when it comes to firearms is a totally ineffective discussion. Let's compare the US to Australia or the UK or Sweden or Germany or Honduras. In all of these examples you're trying to broach an entire country as a controlled experiment with 1 policy as if all other factors are the same...they are not.
Australia is an island. Australia does not happen to border Mexico. Australia at the time of the ban did not happen to have close to a 1:1 population to firearm ratio. No other country has the exact same demographic concerns that are present in the US.
- In the US, virtually any ban on any number or type of firearms will immediately create a huge black market due to saturation.
- When mass shootings happen, as inconvenient as the facts may be, they do always happen in locations with little hope of fighting back. It's just a fact.
- In the US, if you look at broad statistics about gun violence you actually find that over 50% of the homicides come from less than 12% of the population. I'm not going to spell it out for you, but you can feel free to look it up. Without that particular stat the US becomes one of the leaders in the world as far as least gun violence and does so with the highest per-capita gun ownership in the world.
- If you opt to think through things logically, any semi-automatic handgun with a standard 17 round mag (or higher) can easily inflict the level of damage that you see at most of these incidents and it's easier to carry more rounds.
We as a country tend to favor talking points and political stances over problem solving in virtually every case. If you actually look at the problem that you are trying to solve, in detail, the actual problem is response time. The only way to significantly reduce response time throughout the populace is to have more responders potentially available.
I have zero problem with a location opting to ban concealed weapons as long as they are responsible for securing the location and not simply putting up a sign. Government buildings have guards and metal detectors at the entrances. Everywhere else basically just has a sign, which is the problem.
Wait a moment that was a AR-15 and no 100+ deaths .. Hold the press they said it would kill 100 of people . that evil gun.
What you don't remember the Chinese mass stabbing around the same time as a recent US school shooting? Many stabbed, none dead. Not the same as the US result.
Plus, someone using bare hands to stab with a kitchen knife and no training, would likely end up with self-inflicted wounds. Getting blood on it from the first victim, making the handle slippery is common, then the second, without a guard (as few kitchen knives do), they will slip and cut their own hand wide open. It's common in stabbing perpetrators to have cut hands.
Learn to love Alaska
Another shooting in the USA ... yeah yeah whatever. I really don't care anymore. You guys shoot yourselves up and scream about the 2nd amendment to your hearts content, sure as the sun rises tommorrow there will be another shooting soon and you won't do shit to change it
One thing for sure kiddies - it ain't news for nerds or stuff that matters, if it was, something constructive would be done. After all this time we have to conclude you idiots like it this way.
Gov now has the reasons they need to impose even tighter security and restrictions on movement and personal freedom. How convenient!
Signature intentionally left blank.
There would be little political discourse if facts were given consideration.
The problem in the USA is a social issue, not guns. There are many more asshats in the USA now than previous decades and something needs to be done about that. Other than the occasional random shooting, most of it is gang related and confined the liberal meccas of DC, Chicago, LA, NYC, Detroit, etc. The poor and uneducated are mostly to blame, so lets fix that. Personally, a law forbidding the idolization of gangstas (be it rap music, advertising or anything else) would go much farther to fix things.
There was a period of time where kids in the rifle club took their guns on the school bus so they could go shooting after school. No big deal. Now making a gun out of your fingers and saying "pew pew" as kids play at recess gets you expelled. 'Seems this heavy handed approach isn't working. Big Brother approaches never do.
No, he was saying that certain actions have consequences, and you can't have the former without the latter.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Americans go on and on about the second amandment and how guns are necessary for protection against the state.
Sure. I might even buy that. Hell, I wouldn't actively opposive if they suddenly tried to make guns legal where I currently live (Europe).
What baffles me is the fundamental attitude to gun rights in general. That is: From my personal observations (and entirely anecdotal) it seems that the people most likely to use guns to defend their rights are also the people least willing to defend any infringements on the constitution EXCEPT the second amandment, making their argument circular.
I mean, are these people protesting the NSA? No...
Are they protesting against the TSA? Nope.
Are they protesting the bizarre American obscenity laws? Nopelinope.
The NRA is a pretty strong defender of the second amandment. Where do they stand on NSA, TSA and obscenity legislation? Where do they stand on abortion and freedom of religion?
Ban assault rifles and hand guns .... Simple ....
"Oh but why penilise law abiding citizens....?"
Even simpler change the law and they are no longer law abiding.
Clearly there must be a mistake in this story. Airports are "gun free" zones, therefore something like this CAN'T happen there right? It must all be a misunderstanding or it didn't really happen, cause clearly guns were banned in this area and criminals should respect the laws... ...or maybe, in reality, the argument that gun grabbers use (aka, ban them) clearly does not work, and criminals, by definition, ignore/break the laws, and by creating "gun free" zones, or banning guns, only effects actual law abiding citizens and not the criminals that are perpetrating these crimes.
Notice that none of these gun killing spree's happen at a target shooting range, where everyone there has a gun. Nor do they happen at other events where the crowd can be reasonably assumed to be armed, or where the shooter might face someone else who is armed. Every mass shooting in the last several years, and probably further back than that, has happened in so call "gun free" zones.
Columbine (school gun free zone)
Virginia Tech (school gun free zone)
Cathey Giffords (outsize federal building, gun free zone)
Colorado (gun-free Theater)
Ft. Hood (army base that is gun-free zone)
Navy shipyard (navy base that is gun-free zone)
Newtown, CT shooting (school gun free zone)
LAX Airport (airport gun free zone).
Clearly, you are more likely to get shot by a lunatic while in a "gun free" zone than you are at your local shooting range or other non gun-free zone.
http://www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/ausguns.asp
"I could kill dozens of people in a few seconds with an assault rifle."
No, you couldn't, and the fact you think you could shows your utter ignorance. Since I'm not a loon like you are, I'm going to talk paper targets. Let's say 2 dozen, perfectly still, sitting side by side.
A typical magazine is 20-30 rounds - go much higher and welcome to jam-city. A few seconds doesn't leave you time to do a magazine change. You would therefore have to hit most targets with a single bullet. Since you are a real person and not the star of a Hollywood action movie it is impossible for you to fire ~20 accurate aimed shots in the 3-4 seconds you've allowed. You would need to fire in full-auto, where it is pretty much impossible to fire accurately. The army only uses full-auto for suppression. They took full-auto off the M16 deliberately because it was a useless waste of ammo.
tl;dr you are arguing about something you do not understand, and are also a nigger.
They have like 5 or 6 levels of security checkpoints. Each is guarded by several guys armed with M16 (or M4?). Outside of the airport there is an army of more than several dozens, fully armed. Also the location is isolated from urban area, surrounded by plains of several miles wide and there are only a few roads leading to the airport itself - all of the roads have checkpoints in the middle, each are protected by iron bars, and stationed by at least 3-4 guys armed with M16 and bomb detector of some sort.
It's perfect. If I have money I'd build my house to be like that.