Slashdot Mirror


RIAA Targets 21 Sites For Shutdown

New submitter souperfly writes "The Inquirer has a list of 21 sites that the RIAA is looking to get shut down by ISPs this week. The list includes sites filestube, Bomb-Mp3, Mp3skull, Bitsnoop, Extratorrent, Torrenthound, Torrentreactor and Monova, and at least one ISP — Virgin Media in the UK — has confirmed the number of targeted sites. BT confirmed it will block the site, but didn't say when. Before, it was thought that only six sites were lined up for a chop."

140 comments

  1. Dear Anonymous by intermodal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please, find a violation on RIAA.org and get them shut down. I'm begging you.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:Dear Anonymous by 0racle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not your personal army.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:Dear Anonymous by Xicor · · Score: 3, Informative

      lol, obviously we know they arent our personal army... that being said, there would be an argument to say they are an army for the good of the american public. i would hazard a guess and say that it would be beneficial to the american public if the riaa and mpaa would go fuck themselves.

    3. Re:Dear Anonymous by intermodal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree except the part about "American". Anonymous are not restricted to only being an army for the good of the American public. and clearly the *AA groups are detrimental to all nations' publics.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    4. Re:Dear Anonymous by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Why would an amalgamation of anonymous people from all over the world care about a specific country's public?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, we're all washing our hair this weekend.

    6. Re:Dear Anonymous by operagost · · Score: 2

      I agree except for the "good" part. Try "lulz". Anonymous is an army of vainglorious narcissists without any real sense of what person freedom really is.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Dear Anonymous by intermodal · · Score: 1

      Then let them and the RIAA destroy each other. At that point, it's win-win if your characterization is correct.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    8. Re:Dear Anonymous by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The thing is, the RIAA knows how to play the game - they paid for the rules after all.

      You can only get the extravagant fines for copyright infringement if you've registered your copyright with the Library of Congress (which involves paying a fee and sending them a copy of the work). If the copyright isn't registered, the owner can only claim damages suffered. So when the RIAA "steals" artwork or text from a random web artist/author, worst case they have to pay what they would've paid if they had licensed it, best case they're not caught and they pay nothing.

    9. Re:Dear Anonymous by intermodal · · Score: 0

      I understand completely, gotta get the chlorine and AIDS out of your 'fros.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    10. Re:Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      As Jefferson said:

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and Lulz.

    11. Re:Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone please mod parent up. He actually recognized the ironic joke in the post he responded to.

    12. Re:Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An odd attitude to take when begging for a favour.
      Expect us.

    13. Re:Dear Anonymous by BradMajors · · Score: 2

      The registration fee is $35.

    14. Re:Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      +1 would read again

    15. Re:Dear Anonymous by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I always expect Anonymous.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    16. Re:Dear Anonymous by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Then they won't do shit about it, because the story comes from the UK.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    17. Re:Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the rest are as much of a joke as the Lolita City "hack" there's not much to fear, they found a bunch of public nicks (you know, like slashdot nicks) and tried matching them to people using the same nick on regular sites. In other words if I wanted to frame you I could just make a user on LC called TheP4st, "accidentally" reveal some details that match yours and you'd be exposed as a kiddie porn surfer. About 98% of the users weren't that stupid, nobody took them seriously and nobody was arrested. The site itself was never down and never stopped working, the lulz were all ours.

    18. Re:Dear Anonymous by fredprado · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So? Even when it is cheap it still needs to be done, and many times it is far from cheap. For a photographer, for example, registering each picture he takes for 35 can add up to very high amounts.

    19. Re:Dear Anonymous by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      it would be beneficial to the american public if the riaa and mpaa would go fuck themselves.

      Corporations can only reproduce asexually so, that probably wouldn't be all that good for us.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    20. Re:Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      translated as: We're too lazy to do anything for anyone because we're lazy fucks, unless "we" are personally hurt.

      GJ NECKBEARDS.

    21. Re: Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the pursuit of lulz". It's funnier if you leave the original phrasing intact.

    22. Re:Dear Anonymous by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 2

      Solandri: You can only get the extravagant fines for copyright infringement if you've registered your copyright with the Library of Congress (which involves paying a fee and sending them a copy of the work). If the copyright isn't registered, the owner can only claim damages suffered.

      Evidently we can't file suit at all without registering with the LoC first -- though this is the first I've heard of it despite having read a hell of a loton the matter as a writer over the past couple of decades. From the USCopyright Office FAQ:

      Copyright exists from the moment the work is created. You will have to register, however, if you wish to bring a lawsuit for infringement of a U.S. work. See Circular 1, Copyright Basics, section “Copyright Registration.”

      Ihaven't seen anything related to the kind/sum of fines involved in the suit based on registration status. IIRC, all infringement suits are supposed to focus on loss of income ("damages"), with the US law originally written to target companies/individuals selling unauthorized copies, as they rarely gave the creator a share of the resulting proceeds.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    23. Re:Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should. Why not them?

      captcha: backpack

    24. Re:Dear Anonymous by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Couldn't a photographer register copyright in an entire album of photos taken in a week or month or whatever?

    25. Re:Dear Anonymous by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2

      Unlike those Spanish Inquisition guys - they surprise me every time!

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    26. Re:Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An odd attitude to take when begging for a favour.
      Expect us.

      newfag plz go
      https://encyclopediadramatica.es/The_Great_Habbo_Raid_of_July_2007

    27. Re:Dear Anonymous by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Given a choice between the survival of Anonymous, and any of the *AA groups - my thumbs up goes to Anonymous. Any organization that represents corporate interests over citizen's rights will get the thumbs down from me. I'm pretty neutral regarding Anonymous - they do as much or more good than they do bad. None of the *AA groups can claim the same.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    28. Re:Dear Anonymous by fredprado · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but the point is the more prolific you are and the more fragmented is your work the more expensive it becomes to formally copyright it.

    29. Re:Dear Anonymous by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It would seem you have the wrong idea about "Anonymous". Anyone can be "Anonymous", you can be "Anonymous". All that happens is you choose to do an act of protest and rather than doing it in your name, you do in under the banner of "Anonymous". Your choice of protest, what you are protesting and how you are protesting it, is entirely your own. Whether you choose to act on your own or in association with others is entirely you and their choice. Just remember to have fun while doing and take precautions. Safe protesting is like safe sex, taking precautions to prevent, diseases like government and corporate persecution twisted into corrupt prosecution (where the penalty is a "FAILED" extended court case but your are imprisoned for the duration anyhow).

      You want action, then you take action, either alone or in groups but please practice safe protesting.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    30. Re:Dear Anonymous by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      How does that disagree with what I said? That sounds exactly like an amalgamation of anonymous people from all over the place.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    31. Re:Dear Anonymous by oreiasecaman · · Score: 1

      it would be beneficial to the american public if the riaa and mpaa would go fuck themselves.

      Corporations can only reproduce asexually so, that probably wouldn't be all that good for us.

      But they do fsck each other all the time!

      --
      This is a UDP joke, I don't care if you get it or not...
    32. Re: Dear Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the pursuit of lulz". It's funnier if you leave the original phrasing intact.

      If we want to get technical, actually it does stay true to the "original" phrasing. The original draft of the Declaration read "...Life, Liberty and Property". Property was changed to "the Pursuit of Happiness" in the final draft to avoid the perception of supporting slavery. Good day sir.

  2. Thanks for the list by neo-mkrey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I didn't know about half of those before.

    1. Re:Thanks for the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately the RIAA doesn't represent any of the artist I listen to and you can't find their music on those sites... ie local/unsigned bands...

      Sad to say not only do I not purchase music {except at concerts by local/unsigned bands}, I don't even turn the radio on anymore let alone take the time to pirate any.

    2. Re:Thanks for the list by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, awful nice of them to point out these guys. New torrent sites to loot...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  3. And all will have due process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And all these sites will have due process rights and a day in court before any of thier sites or livelyhoods are ruined... Oh wait a minute....

    1. Re:And all will have due process by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      No, they will just fine them 100,000$ per song and 2 million per movie, plus 50,000$ punitive damages for each .torrent found.

      (after seizing the servers located in other countries that is)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    2. Re:And all will have due process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (after seizing the servers located in other countries that is)

      I think you mean "After having the FBI seize servers located in other countries."

    3. Re:And all will have due process by rea1l1 · · Score: 1

      Mob rule is the fall back when a republic is usurped by an aristocratic elite.

  4. Re:what the flying fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And, ah, yes, iTunes, AmazonMP3 are just terrible market failures that prove no one still pays for music.

  5. Whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing they don't know about t******z.eu

    That's been the best one for years.

    1. Re:Whew by fisted · · Score: 1

      .eu ... RIAA
      Hint, hint...

    2. Re:Whew by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      If you'll kindly read the article, you'll find out that doesn't actually seem to matter to these clowns.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Whew by fisted · · Score: 1

      Reading the article? On /.? Ridiculous.

  6. Re:what the flying fuck? by intermodal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm glad the whip and buggy industries were not as organized as today's IP industries.

    Also, I find it insulting that Mr. Turkewitz considers shared music illegitimate by default. What music I have released, and most of my friends have released, was free and distribution was encouraged. In fact, my first release was on ocremix.org, where all the music is free and torrents of their content are an encouraged distribution method. I'm sure glad this RIAA shill has set us straight and made it clear how illegitimate our free community-minded distribution of our works is. Sure wouldn't want to encourage that kind of illegitimate "online music marketplace."

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  7. Shutting down Virgin Media? by Aguazul2 · · Score: 2

    I thought for a moment this was going to be more interesting. "But you can't shut down our ISP, how will we connect to the internet?" "We don't care. Virgin Media has been used for copyright infringement and must be eliminated from the face of the earth. Our business model requires it, and we all know that the well-being of the music industry overrides all other concerns."

    1. Re:Shutting down Virgin Media? by suutar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This brings to mind a persistent fantasy of mine: buying a substantial share of an RIAA member, and having them repudiate the RIAA and otherwise stop being evil, and watching the rest of the RIAA panic as they lose market share. The reason this comes to mind is that while I don't have the resources to do it, Richard Branson might...

    2. Re:Shutting down Virgin Media? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh I'm guessing you missed out on Virgin Music?

    3. Re:Shutting down Virgin Media? by suutar · · Score: 1

      I figured they were one of the member labels (there's a crapload of those, after all), but they're not on the board, which means they have no control, they're just paying their protection fee.

    4. Re:Shutting down Virgin Media? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...we all know that the well-being of the music industry overrides all other concerns.

      Including that of making actual music (rather than the shite they call music these days.)

      P2P was probably a godsend for them. "Oh yay \o/ we don't have to 'struggle' to make money by selling 'music' and managing these troublesome artists etc. - we can now just sue grandmothers and gradually eliminate music production from our portfolio of activities."

    5. Re:Shutting down Virgin Media? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      If a mutual fund formed for the express purpose of buying out the music industry and releasing their entire catalogs to the public domain, I'd buy. True, the share value of the fund might tank once they achieve 50% ownership and the power to force the release of all the music, but share value wouldn't be the point of it. It might also not tank, to the vast surprise of the old guard predicting doom.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  8. Re:what the flying fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be fitting for Neil Turkewitz and people like him to find themselves in a Saw type device which is recorded and shared about via the very locations they wish to get shutdown.

  9. Re:what the flying fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You do not have the right to dictate changes to a society so that it fits your business model better.

    So, how about the bills before Congress authorizing more H1B's? American companies should be able to hire the best talent to compete in the global economy, right?

    Oh sorry... it's only someone else's business model that needs to adapt to the changing times. When it's our personal business model that's at stake, then it's, like, personal.

  10. Re:what the flying fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What music I have released, and most of my friends have released, was free and distribution was encouraged.

    Indeed. I, too, make music and release it for free, encouraging distribution. I have to put big disclaimers on my site saying that yes this is legal and no I am not affiliated with any RIAA record labels.

    (Posting anonymously so as not to appear as a self-promotion.)

  11. Lichtenstein Photocopy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ask myself why would anyone support this industry with manufactured superstars, wealthy clowns that shudder and flop to braindead pulsing all the while ancient disc media is shifted around the world as if some shadowy currency

    the day music died was long ago but from it arose a gigantic undead corpse in the 60s, going through the motions of art while fuelling on greed until only the hunger for money was left

    this beast was slow to understand the impact of a new communications medium, its reptilian brain finally sensing threat began its strangling trying to lock our culture in a box and charge admission, building the weapons of silence for the defence of a dusty ledger

    furthermore I think I may have taken NyQuil instead of DayQuil and shouldn't be modifying this database script... UG

  12. Re:what the flying fuck? by girlintraining · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Fuck off and die in a fire. You do not have the right to dictate changes to a society so that it fits your business model better.

    Easy there cowboy, no need to get angry. None of the sites they I'd ever heard of before today, and I pirate the everloving fuck out of anything stamped as owned by the British Emp--er, RIAA. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go dump some more of their junk in the river while dressed like one of the village people...

    As long as they maintain this level of incompetence, piracy will live on forever.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  13. Re:what the flying fuck? by stox · · Score: 1

    For a second there, I thought he was describing RIAA.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  14. Re:what the flying fuck? by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

    As a huge fan of ocremix and a man who couldn't carry a tune in a bucket, I'd like to thank you and people like you for remembering what it's like to be an artist.

    --
    "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
  15. Really easy not to do business with Riaa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_RIAA_member_labels

    I no longer do.

    Sharing cassette tapes in my day was how we learned of new music.

    Notice the sansui g 8000-35000 are in storage not the living room.
    We shared listening experience Who cares the crap mp3 on someones ipod no one.

  16. The RIAA can kiss my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They stole from Canadian artists and are suing people who pirate albums from Canadian artists, against the will of said artists.

    1. Re:The RIAA can kiss my ass by HiThere · · Score: 3, Informative

      They steal from US artists, too. Never believe them when they say they're doing something for the sake of the artists. The artists never see any of that money (bar one or two out of a thousand or so). They drive more artists into debt than they make wealthy. And by debt I mean they get them to sign a contract allowing the company to promote the artist as they choose, and commiting the artist to pay for it, and when the promotion costs more than (by *their* accounting) they bring in, the send the artists a hefty bill. And every time they've been reviewed by an external auditor (it's rarely possible to force this) they've been found to be under counting the profits.

      You are, on the average, better off if you never sign anything they offer you. The exceptions occur, but they are so rare as to be an anomoly.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:The RIAA can kiss my ass by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, but they literally stole from the Canadians. There was an article awhile back about the (Canadian-equivalent?) RIAA making compilation albums and saying "we'll pay you guys later" and then never doing so.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  17. Re:what the flying fuck? by intermodal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    oh, I'm no artist. I was a post-surgical kid on Vicodin with a demo version of Fruity Loops on Win98. But I have since taken up guitar, partially inspired by that experience.

    Music is not an industry. Music is practically a food group.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  18. Re:what the flying fuck? by intermodal · · Score: 1

    Good on you! Keep up the good work.

    And I thought I checked anon as well. I bet I anon-posted on the wrong response tab.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  19. Re:what the flying fuck? by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    H1Bs are an underclass. That's the real problem with H1Bs.

    If someone is important enough and their skills important enough that you want to drag them half way across the planet then treat them like a real person and give them a green card or even instant citizenship.

    No republic should tolerate the creation of an underclass. It's a threat to the liberties of everyone. It's also ultimately bad for business since the bottom line is entangled with individual liberty.

    Also, the idea that corporations can poach talent from across the planet is also unequal. If they can do that then we should likewise be able to do the same (work where the cost of living is cheap).

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  20. Re:what the flying fuck? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    Remember when it was England who used to tell Americans what to do?

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  21. Bitsnoop, Torrenthound and Torrenreactor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These have been high-quality torrent sites. I'd be outraged to see them go.

    One less reason to like 'murika >:(

    1. Re:Bitsnoop, Torrenthound and Torrenreactor by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Please don't dislike us because of these skidmarks - there's plenty of other reasons you might dislike us for that we actually have control over.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  22. Noun/verb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please please please please because it makes my eyes bleed:

    "Get shut down" --- verb.

    "A shutdown" --- noun.

    1. Re:Noun/verb by X0563511 · · Score: 1
      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  23. Re:what the flying fuck? by MikeDataLink · · Score: 2

    Here's a glimpse into that alternate future.

    http://whyswords.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/horsecar.jpg

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  24. "Shut down," not "shutdown," dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn English.

    1. Re:"Shut down," not "shutdown," dammit! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You might take your own advice. Perfectly valid, if you read in the missing "a" before "Shutdown" that is commonly dropped in headlines.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:"Shut down," not "shutdown," dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you've corrected both GP and me (and linked to your comment, how cute!) and suggested that I am 'reading it wrong', let me assure you that I am not complaining about the headline, and I suspect GP is not.

      If _you_ had read it right, you would have seen:

      "The Inquirer has a list of 21 sites that the RIAA is looking to get shutdown by ISPs this week."

      This should be "looking to get shut down".

      Which is what I was complaining about. The headline is fine; this sentence is wrong.

  25. Uh, ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And I target the RIAA with my asshole

  26. Re:what the flying fuck? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    That would mean anything if I, or the people being discussed, had anything to do with Congress or H1Bs.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  27. Re:what the flying fuck? by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Vaguely. I seem to remember lots of violence being the result, incidentally.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  28. thanks for the list of 21 sites!! by themushroom · · Score: 2

    Yeah, that was nice, don't tell us what all is affected.
    (MP3Skull will be no big loss, never saw a downloadable file ever.)

    And I'm betting if KAT was on the list we'd hear about it.

  29. Re:what the flying fuck? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Music is not an industry

    I think this deserves repeating.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  30. AMERICAN MUSIC CARTEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like it, so gangsta.

  31. Re:what the flying fuck? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Doesn't even have to be free music. If I own a CD and I lend it to a friend, or share it with a friend when they come to visit, or I make a copy for my phone or computer, that's perfectly legitimate.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  32. "This is not even my final form" by oic0 · · Score: 2

    The RIAA is actually the music industries final form. The only way for them to remain relevant is to become a law firm that litigates non stop.

    1. Re:"This is not even my final form" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nuh-uh. an actual government department. that way they can reach straight into your pocket without going through the hassle of a court case.

  33. Re:what the flying fuck? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, kinda. Music sales are way down, even including MP3s. What is booming is streaming. Most music is shit, or at least not worth 50p to own, so people just stream it instead of owning it. Streaming doesn't make as much money as sales.

    The other worrying thing is that apparently streaming and MP3 are good enough quality for most people. The music industry was rather hoping that there would be a market for higher quality than CD, in the form of SACD an DVD-Audio. It's their own fault really, modern music (even re-releases of old stuff) is so heavily compressed and distorted that there really isn't any point trying for higher quality recordings.

    Protip record labels, if you want to sell more discs. The last two I bought were re-issues of ones I already owned but properly mastered. The only people still buying your warez care about sound quality. Everyone else listens for free on YouTube or the radio.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  34. I love these RIAA site lists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swear they were the ones who originally told me about last few sites I've used on the rare occasions I download music or a movie. Especially when it comes to ISP level filtering, this is basically an advert.

  35. IFPI and MPA by tepples · · Score: 1

    Then let me internationalize Xicor's comment: I would hazard a guess and say that it would be beneficial to the global public if the IFPI and MPA would go f themselves.

    1. Re:IFPI and MPA by Xicor · · Score: 1

      this... except that the MPAA and RIAA are american organizations... but the world would be a better place without them.

    2. Re:IFPI and MPA by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'll certainly agree to that.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:IFPI and MPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this... except that the MPAA and RIAA are american organizations... but the world would be a better place without them.

      You sure aint wrong there .

      Bloody mankee wankee yankee tossers they WILL one day piss off the wrong person then caboom no more MPAA or RIAA all gorrrrnnnnnn deader ..

  36. Re:what the flying fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello, music as a concept belongs to the RIAA. Didn't you get the memo:

  37. Eventually ocremix.org will get sued by tepples · · Score: 1

    So what happens once video game publishers, who own copyright in the compositions underlying all of OCR, start cease-and-desisting OCR?

  38. Re:what the flying fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty sure the 'dressed like one of the village people' part was redundant. I imagine you always dress that way.

  39. Music publishers by tepples · · Score: 1

    So if I were to write, record, and release an album outside the RIAA system, how should I defend myself from plagiarism accusations brought by the music publishers that share a parent company with the RIAA labels? For example, what should George Harrison have done differently when writing "My Sweet Lord"?

  40. Re:what the flying fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice one Captain Shill.

    Less obvious next time please.

    Lol: captcha: paranoia

  41. Re:what the flying fuck? by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

    Also, the idea that corporations can poach talent from across the planet is also unequal. If they can do that then we should likewise be able to do the same (work where the cost of living is cheap).

    Isn't that what work visas or outright immigration are for?

    Aside from that, one country letting businesses import underpaid labor (via H1B or unreported illegal immigration)to keep wages artificially low shouldn't force all other countries outside that arrangement to do the same. After watching the damage that approach has caused California over the last few decades, I wouldn't wish it on another country's citizens unless they were truly vile individuals.

    FWIW, the above is due to anger at the socioeconomic situation and associated problems (e.g. rise in crime). My schools, friends & extended family already had a high degree of racial diversity (including plenty of 1st-to-3rd gen immigrants), so it's not an "omg non-white people" issue.

    --
    Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
  42. RIAA still exists? by ALeader71 · · Score: 1

    Didn't Apple (mostly) kill music DRM by proving that people will buy digital music if it isn't a major pain in the ass to purchase, store, recover, or access? Hasn't the rise of streaming services like Pandora, Rdio and Spotify places the final nails in RIAA's coffin?

    Isn't the lack of live, streaming NFL and NBA games cable and satellite's last hope for DRM laced video? More and more people prefer NOT to sit with a bunch of self absorbed phone addicts in a dark theater to watch a crappy movie.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of War. - Plato
    1. Re:RIAA still exists? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Maybe if the movie theater owners did more to make the experience better, more people would go to the theater.

      Why cant theaters just have conditions of entry that tell people that use of mobile phones in the theater is prohibited (along with recording devices, alcohol, glass bottles, metal cans and hot food). Anyone who violates the conditions of entry gets ejected from the theater.

      Here in Australia, all theaters I have been to have such rules (and they usually have a message right at the start saying "please turn off your phones") and I have never experienced someone using a phone during the film itself in a way that is distracting or annoying.

    2. Re:RIAA still exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir underestimate how ridiculously stupid the US population is. Most of them seem to be under a bizarre impression that they have a right to use their phones wherever they please regardless of the posted rules. We have so few considerate people that we could probably all move to a small island and still have plenty of open space.

    3. Re:RIAA still exists? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      If its clearly spelled out in the conditions of entry and with a message at the start of the show and people still use their phones, the theater owners would then have the right to kick the phone abusers out (since a movie theater is private property)

    4. Re:RIAA still exists? by jxander · · Score: 1

      Maybe if the movie theater owners did more to make the experience better, more people would go to the theater.

      Might I direct your attention to Cinepolis

      Tickets are a bit more pricey, just under $20 a seat ... but it's a leather recliner, with plenty of elbow room. Some are positioned in pairs for couples, with small tables for ACTUAL food and drinks (to include beer and wine) delivered to your seat, at the push of a button.

      It's the only way I watch movies these days. Totally worth it

      --
      This signature is false.
    5. Re:RIAA still exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More and more people prefer NOT to sit with a bunch of self absorbed phone addicts in a dark theater to watch a crappy movie.

      One word: popcorn. Sure, there's the stuff you can make at home, but it's never possible to get it quite as good as the movie theater stuff.

    6. Re:RIAA still exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can already throw them out. They don't need to add more signage for the stupid.

  43. HA-HA-HA! by jennatalia · · Score: 0

    kat.ph is still around!....no wait, it's kickass.ph!....no wait, it's kickass.to!

  44. Re:what the flying fuck? by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't pirate online, but that's not to say my previous collection is from umm...dubious origins. In any event, I do stream music rather than listen to FM radio because it opens me up to whole genres of music I would otherwise not be exposed to short of making a random purchase of music. Which BTW was the norm back in the mid 90s's and prior. Back then if you wanted to hear music other than what was on radio rotation, you got exposed to music from other peoples collection (which was often limited), or close your eyes and pull an LP/CD/Cassette and random and hoped for the best. However today, I'm finding all sorts of obscure bands that range from absolute shit to pure genius-why-isn't-this-top-40 level of stuff. Eventually, I'll find something I like and will do one of two things. 1; find a used CD and purchase online or, 2; purchase music from iTunes. Come full circle now, I'm purchasing more music thanks to legitimate internet streaming than I've ever did before. As for the RIAA, they can go fuck themselves!!! They're not the sole arbiter of what music should and shouldn't be popular. I'm not fucking cattle!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  45. Re:what the flying fuck? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

    You are obviously poorly educated, my friend. Let me help you with a basic concept. Any activity which fails to enrich either an American corporation, or the wealthiest 1%, or both, is by default "illegitimate". Your purpose in life is to help to amass more fortunes for those who already have more money than they can ever hope to spend. If you are not fulfilling that purpose, then you are illegitimate.

    Check your sarcasm meter - the above is sarcasm because I have posted it. Had a RIAA rep posted it, there would be no sarcasm at all - he would be 100% serious.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  46. Similar thing happened in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Australia, we went through similar motions last year (http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/04/20/0058202/australian-isp-wins-case-against-movie-studios), however our difference is that the local ISP fought back. In interviews with that ISP's CEO, he basically stated (paraphrased) "If MPAA/RIAA reported their findings to the police, and the police asked us for information on our customers - we would gladly provide those details. However we do not report to the MPAA/RIAA, so why should we get our customers in trouble if it's not warranted".

    What the UK definitely needs, is an ISP who will stand up to the fact that the MPAA/RIAA actually have no rights both nationally and internationally. They can whinge all they want, but until the police/relevant local governing body with jurisdiction over the matter makes the decision, the ISPs should be free to provide access to whatever sites that the customers want.

    This is absolutely ridiculous that an association has such influence in this regard. Emphasis that it's an association, not a governing body / police department.

    1. Re:Similar thing happened in Australia by ledow · · Score: 1

      The courts issued a order. That's about the ultimate legal requirement to do something.

      And the ISP's did protest at first and fought the first orders in court. They failed, and appealed. The court still issued the orders. Since then, the ISP's have a legal requirement to carry out the orders.

      The ISP's have done everything they can and did not want to co-operate. And there's some dubious legal theory going on (for a start, the "big six" ISP's are the only ones that are required to block things, while anyone smaller doesn't even get involved and isn't required to do anything at all). But that has to be turned over in court at great expense because the legal decision has already been made.

      Sure, we could fight it more, but it's hard to justify why you need to facilitate access to illegal content.

    2. Re:Similar thing happened in Australia by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      So all we have to do is found a bunch of other ISPs but keep their number of customers just barely below the No. 6 position? :)

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  47. That's a file system design problem by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't see how it should necessarily be so hard to select all of one's photos whose timestamp is last month, paste them in a document, verify that they're actually photos that one remembers taking, save in some format accepted by copyright.gov, and submit the file for registration.

    1. Re:That's a file system design problem by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Well, the process is probably not without a fair measure of bureaucracy. I guess that is why most people do not bother to do it. And I am not sure you can copyright in bulk like this without publishing a book with them or something.

    2. Re:That's a file system design problem by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, the process is probably not without a fair measure of bureaucracy. I guess that is why most people do not bother to do it. And I am not sure you can copyright in bulk like this without publishing a book with them or something.

      I just registered Nobots a month or so ago, and registered two software programs in 1984. It's quick and painless; in 1984 there was paper you had to write the copyright office to get but the forms were easy to fill out. Today you just go to copyright.gov and do it online, it's an easy process.

      Getting the damned thing in print is where the bureaucracy comes in, and it isn't government bureaucracy but corporate bureaucracy. It's been three weeks since I sent the PDF and cover and fee to Lulu, they shipped the galley proof last Thursday and I still haven't gotten it.

      But all a photographer would have to do would be to register a URL and get hosted (I'm paying $15 a year to register4less for mcgrewbooks.com, registration and hosting), upload the pictures, send it to the copyright office with $35 and you can sue away. That is, if you actually need to.

      Plus, if you see someone infringing, just register the copyright and call your lawyer.

  48. Re:what the flying fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No republic should tolerate the creation of an underclass. It's a threat to the liberties of everyone. It's also ultimately bad for business since the bottom line is entangled with individual liberty.

    That's an incredibly patronizing attitude. You don't think that adults are able to make that decision for themselves, considering the tradeoffs with the benefit of discussion with local townspeople who have done the same?

    It's amazing how creative the people on this site are coming up with self-serving arguments. Oh this is not for me, this is to protect the would-be professionals living in India and China from casual exploitation from the Microsofts of the world. Then others chime in: How informative. How insightful!

    How hypocritical. Now go back to your little RIAA bashing.

  49. Re:what the flying fuck? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

    One thing I like to do in discussions of this subject is check out links to music. So please, post some links. Since you've blown your cover anyway, might as well.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  50. Re:what the flying fuck? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Theif? I produce!

    And yes, it does indeed suck a whole bag of dicks. The page title is not sarcasm. 99% of what is actually on my webserver is not globally visible and indexing does not work. It's a glorified dropbox. Sure, I used to have a blog - but it went away when I got sick of fighting with security vulnerabilities and realized I didn't really have much to say on it. I put things on it, then link to them. See? That's you, right there!

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  51. Whewww, that was close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I'm not on the list. Google indexed my entire private multimedia site and posted it to the web. As near as I can figure the webproxy at work submitted everything I accessed. To think I still can't get Google to index my public site, maybe I should post some anti Bush rhetoric to entice them.

  52. Re:what the flying fuck? by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Honestly, AFAIC if you're contributing to the conversation, even a little, there's no reason not to post your own links to your own site(s). It's the "posting just to advertise" that people hate.

  53. Shared music illegitimate by default. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. This is one of their most repugnant rethorical tricks (and they have quite a bunch of them). Their version is even worse: they don't say "by default". Just "Shared == illegitimate". Ugh.

  54. An opportunity! by Thanshin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is good news. The torrent server panorama was getting stale and complacent.

    Cheers to the new players! Live short and bright lives!

  55. Re:what the flying fuck? by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

    +1!

    You've characterized the slashdot reader very well. They are libertarian as long as their jobs are safe and their lifestyle is not threatened. They want no government interference whether it's job market or drug ban. But put THEM in a market, start evaluating options for replacing them, they become protectionist!

    --
    I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
  56. Re:what the flying fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one gives a shit about your bedroom music creations.

    Oh, I'm sorry: you lose. I give a shit about "bedroom music creations." In short: suck it bitch.

  57. Re:what the flying fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me too. Me and a mate did a record and were happy enough to just put it on soundcloud, last.fm etc. Maybe it's just me being an oddball but I think art is sullied when it's all about money.

  58. And Virgin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Torrenthound, Torrentreactor and Monova, and at least one ISP - Virgin Media in the UK

    Aww, for a moment I thought they were going to shut down Virgin Media, I almost liked RIAA.

  59. full list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder what the full list of 21 is? Is youtube itself on the list? What about bing or google?

  60. Call the bulls by the names by ruir · · Score: 1

    RIAA is just a proxy for the big names of the entertainment industry. Hurt them where it hurst, in the wallet. Boycott movies and cable TV.

  61. Re:what the flying fuck? by intermodal · · Score: 1

    It doesn't have to pose a major threat; every lost sale is a lost sale. I haven't given them a dime in years, and I don't "pirate" their product.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  62. Re:what the flying fuck? by Droolster · · Score: 1

    The music industry was rather hoping that there would be a market for higher quality than CD, in the form of SACD an DVD-Audio.

    Don't forget the Blu-ray album reported the other week. To me, it just smacks of trying to get rid of music which is portable; let's all go back to strapping hulking disc (or, god forbid, cassette) players to our belts with bags of the relevant storage medium on our backs. Not that I think this so-called hi-def audio is a bad idea, just the execution of it..

  63. Re:what the flying fuck? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

    There's no substitute for a hard copy (well, a copy I have on a device where *I* control the bits), even if only to retain it if they stop serving it up.

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  64. Re:what the flying fuck? by intermodal · · Score: 1

    Be forewarned, I had no musical training or experience at the time. My brother was in percussion at the time in high school. Here it is. My brother is DJ Goyim, I was DJ Intermodal. I really think he and I should do another collaboration now that it has been 12 years. Especially once I get some equipment and can actually record my guitar, and it would be great if he picked his drums up again. Last I saw, the entire kit was sitting in our parents' hall closet.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  65. Re:what the flying fuck? by rea1l1 · · Score: 1

    Protip to corporations: if you want to sell stuff, you need to have a middle class to buy it, which means you can't horde your funds or merely cycle them among the already wealthy.

    "trickle down economics" works as well as "bottom up economics", but really what we need is "middle to middle economics", in which the majority of the population earn similar amounts.

    Somehow, every system we build, no matter how new and updated, an aristocracy forms at the top of the power structure and attempts to rule the masses indefinitely.

  66. Re:what the flying fuck? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Also, I find it insulting that Mr. Turkewitz considers shared music illegitimate by default.

    It's in his best interests -- YOU are his competition. You are the biggest threat to the RIAA -- you, the independent. Do you really think the RIAA gives a shit if I give you a copy of a Metallica album? But if I give Joe Blow a copy of your album, he might like it and buy another of your albums, leaving Joe with less money to buy an RIAA album with.

    As Doctorow says, nobody ever went broke from piracy but many artists have starved from obscurity, which is why I put the first drafts of "Nobots" in my /. journal; as soon as I can get it printed (been waiting 3 weeks for a galley proof, they shipped it last Thursday and it's not here yet) I have a couple of sales. I may not make back what I've invested in it (so far about $350) but if nobody had read my stuff, how would I sell even a single copy?

    As soon as I get to where you can get a copy from Amazon I'll put a finished version of it, one chapter per week, in my journal and on my new web site. A month after it's out I'll make paperback available, a month after that I'm posting PDF and e-pub on my site for free download... because I didn't write it to sell, I wrote it to be read.

  67. Re:what the flying fuck? by intermodal · · Score: 1

    Oh, on this we certainly agree, I was imply remarking on the potentially libellous nature of referring to file sharing as a whole as if it were illegitimate until proven otherwise. Innocent until proven guilty is the basic premise of criminal law in the United States, even if people have bastardized that over the past 200 or so years.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  68. Re:what the flying fuck? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Oh, on this we certainly agree,

    I was sure of that, I just needed to beat my dead horse again, that lazy bastard...