and your 'int main()' takes an unspecified amount of arguments. to specify 0 you'd do 'int main(void)'. Of course you'd know that if you hadn't learned C through internet tutorials...
what is/are "Microsoft and Apple's IP standov protection legal teams"?
Re:The name Ethernet is 40 years old...
on
Ethernet Turns 40
·
· Score: 2
No, you're mistaken. It can still operate on a shared medium, the abundance of cheap-ass switches (which aren't 'intelligent' as you call them) hasn't changed the actual technology.
/. - get modded insightful for pointing out ethernet is point-to-point...
technically it's not that difficult. There are engineers who know which screws to remove, where the hooks and claws sit, etc, in order to disassemble the Internet and pull out that video. It's a matter of cost, mainly, and while it is a daunting task already to dismantle the machine, it's even more difficult to properly put it back together in the end. I wouldn't be the one to risk that, tbh. What if you, say, forget a gear, or mismatch the pressure release valve?
> Once someone successfully build a computer that can simulate 86 billion neurons and 100 trillion connection all at the same time, someone else will build an even bigger computer that can do 10x as much, and then those brains will attempt to up that... ad nauseum
I mean, grabbing the energy the plant 'produces' by photosynthesis. I don't suppose the plant was going to do anything important with that energy? like sustaining it's own life?
Slashdot Mirror
and your 'int main()' takes an unspecified amount of arguments. to specify 0 you'd do 'int main(void)'.
Of course you'd know that if you hadn't learned C through internet tutorials...
You're doing it wrong.
haha - i'd mod you up if slashdot weren't all like "You cannot moderate a thread that you've commented in".
> Radio is just our term for a band of the light spectrum
Actually, light is just our term for a band of the radio spectrum...
what is/are "Microsoft and Apple's IP standov protection legal teams"?
No, you're mistaken. It can still operate on a shared medium, the abundance of cheap-ass switches (which aren't 'intelligent' as you call them) hasn't changed the actual technology.
/. - get modded insightful for pointing out ethernet is point-to-point...
APK's network can and will go wrong, since his HOSTS file filters all those corrupt slashdot lusers .
Editors don't edit anymore because they perfectly know their readers don't read TFS anyway. The only group left on /. holding up to their promises are
...and nothing of value was lost.
If modern web means IE9 or higher, then thanks, but no, thanks.
It's just that You Can't Explain That.
As long as the fucking soldier ants stay outside i'm fine.
It really isn't funny like that..
One more reason to become a plumber.
The only reason for "PowerShell" is that they failed to improve cmd.exe.
Cool, Mum's-Basement-to-Mum's-Basement protocol?
technically it's not that difficult. There are engineers who know which screws to remove, where the hooks and claws sit, etc, in order to disassemble the Internet and pull out that video. It's a matter of cost, mainly, and while it is a daunting task already to dismantle the machine, it's even more difficult to properly put it back together in the end.
I wouldn't be the one to risk that, tbh. What if you, say, forget a gear, or mismatch the pressure release valve?
> Once someone successfully build a computer that can simulate 86 billion neurons and 100 trillion connection all at the same time, someone else will build an even bigger computer that can do 10x as much, and then those brains will attempt to up that ... ad nauseum
FTFY
> Just the yesterday there was another thread where someone was trying to suggest [...] instead of realizing [...].
What?! Someone was wrong on the Internet?
"I accidentally part of the word." FTFTFTFTFY
offend much?
[x] cheap
[x] useless
[x] have pointy edges
I say man the catapults!
I mean, grabbing the energy the plant 'produces' by photosynthesis. I don't suppose the plant was going to do anything important with that energy? like sustaining it's own life?
> It was never engineering, my friend.
Oh yeah it was, and is, my friend. Just not in your consumer-grade-piece-of-shit environment called x86/wintel.
Like there was any fundamental difference between hardware and software engineering. Once you can truly automate one, same is possible for the other.