You must be new here. While reading TFS is already discouraged, it's an absolute no-no to read TFA. You couldn't be breaking/. netiquette in a worse way.
In a world where everyone and their mother actually uses TOR and I2P, that might be a viable solution.
In the real world, it solves none of the problems with ISP-level NAT, it rather creates an additional one on the TX path.
> It will probably revert to only being a display device, a personal HUD.
Except such a HUD is fairly boring if it has no means to visually analyze your environment...
Slashdot Mirror
Doesn't look like it...
I don't care much as long as they stay clear of the BSDs
..in my ivory tower built from free software and dumbphones.
I don't share your pain.
Whoever'd use that for gaming is a moron. Much more profitable to mine some bitcoins on your neighbours electricity
> You're ignoring the fact that modern email is almost entirely sent over SSL.
You should get your facts straight. Also, if you thought SSL provides sender-to-recipient encryption, i have some bad news for you.
You must be new here. While reading TFS is already discouraged, it's an absolute no-no to read TFA. You couldn't be breaking /. netiquette in a worse way.
And the problems you name are Linux' fault how exactly?
> [...] and always will.
Thanks for sparing me the effort to point out your narrow-mindedness.
Does it? How so, exactly?
In a world where everyone and their mother actually uses TOR and I2P, that might be a viable solution.
In the real world, it solves none of the problems with ISP-level NAT, it rather creates an additional one on the TX path.
I have lots of pics of kitten. The bacteria constructed from my data will probably the glory of darwin.
You had to modify the URL, which you didn't see thanks to your proxy. After that, you suddenly saw the URL and clicked it. Seems legit.
you should get your opposites right
i think he means a corrupted slashdot luser who penetrated the moderation system.
Hows this even remotely related to the actual issues which come with NAT?
Who allowed you to talk? Didn't Microsoft command you to shut up and bend over?
No. There's no way your cheap lunix-ripoff could possibly die twice anyway.
Wow, Sir, you know about that obscure C64 service!
Here, have some geek cred!
> and i just noticed that I forgot to reply as Anonymous Coward...
FTFY
Your point being?
Because nomen might not always be omen, you insensitive clod!
you don't actually divide by zero in limes calculations. Not even with L'Hopital, if you dig deep enough.
And how exactly does this make a 'blind' HUD useful? What is it to display, the time and perhaps your mailbox status? Geez.
> It will probably revert to only being a display device, a personal HUD.
Except such a HUD is fairly boring if it has no means to visually analyze your environment...
and i'll be all like "meh".