"Is a "no, you!"-kind of reply all you can come up with for a proper comeback?"
He/she probably decided a dick like you that lashes out at random and clearly has huge issues about relationships wouldn't be worth the effort.
Odd that it was worth the effort to reply at all then, wouldn't you think?
I've seen people be all sorts of idiots on here, this is about the most unjustified and personal attack ever.
It was justified by the stupidity of the initial post, which starts boldly with "Bullshit" and then goes on to
Skype is not only preventing status updates and showing users offline...Both me and my girlfriend, from different points in the country and different ISPs, are actually UNABLE TO CONNECT.
If you don't see the stupidity of this, let me rephrase it for you:
Skype is not only preventing status updates [...] [b]oth me and my girlfriend [...] are actually UNABLE TO [change our status from offline to online].
Well duh. Heck, it is currently mismodded at +2, Funny; Maybe people are granting him the benefit of the doubt, I don't know.
PS before you ask I'm married AND know where my wife is. Is that OK with you?
Why would you believe i would have asked that? It seems you require some practice in reading comprehension as well, given that you apparently weren't able to follow the conversation at all...
Well, let's practice reading comprehension a bit, shall we?
TFS says
f(sic) you're signed in to Skype, you will not be able to change your status and your contacts will all show as offline even if they are online. As a result, you won't be able to start Skype calls to them
And now you're complaining that you can't sign in in the first place. Well guess what,/if/ you managed to sign in, you'd in turn be... signed in. Let's see what TFS has to say about that:
f(sic) you're signed in to Skype, you will not be able to change your status and your contacts will all show as offline even if they are online. As a result, you won't be able to start Skype calls to them
So your complaint is meaningless and obvious to people remotely computer-literate. (Also, note that the statement starts with "if". Do you understand that "if it is raining today, i'll visit the museum" does not imply that i wouldn't visit the museum were it a sunny day?)
Or is your point that TFS didn't explicitly say "Signed-in users might lose their connection"? Well no shit.
It figures you're a skype user.
And your envy related jokes about the girlfriend were totally unnecessary. You probably still get to point out that you are a poor little thing do not have a girlfriend/boyfriend/dog/octopuss/whatever somewhere.
Is a "no, you!"-kind of reply all you can come up with for a proper comeback? Good grief. FWIW I prefer to have my partners not "somewhere" but "around". This might seem unorthodox to someone used to hooking up with people over the internet, but maybe you'll find it enjoyable some time in the future, too. Best of luck!
A 3D printed drone that connects to the IoT and has iPhone connectivity with an app that hacks Tesla cars and relies on a webscale database, built by the Maker Community!
It only makes more sense if you ignore that you need to create a detailed accoustic profile of that exact keyboard in that exact position before you can interpret the noise...
You're saying that like it was a good thing instead of something completely idiotic... Let's see, you paid extra (implicitly or explicitly) for many times more load on the starter battery and the starter generator (both hence needing replacement earlier), while adding another system that can, and will eventually, fail. At which point it gets even more expensive. Plus, the (significant) juice required to start the engine will, at the expense of your milage, have to be fed back into the battery.
And this all because it is "environmentally friendly" and "saves gas consumption", i presume you were told when buying the car. Have you ever looked at how much gas an idle engine consumes, or how much it exhausts, for that matter? I suggest you don't, because it will ruin your day.
ESC software will brake the necessary individual wheel(s) (up to three with the most sophisticated systems), so that the vehicle goes the way the driver intends.
Slashdot Mirror
The people made fun of no longer exist.
That's only because they fell off the damn rim, silly.
"Is a "no, you!"-kind of reply all you can come up with for a proper comeback?"
He/she probably decided a dick like you that lashes out at random and clearly has huge issues about relationships wouldn't be worth the effort.
Odd that it was worth the effort to reply at all then, wouldn't you think?
I've seen people be all sorts of idiots on here, this is about the most unjustified and personal attack ever.
It was justified by the stupidity of the initial post, which starts boldly with "Bullshit" and then goes on to
Skype is not only preventing status updates and showing users offline...Both me and my girlfriend, from different points in the country and different ISPs, are actually UNABLE TO CONNECT.
If you don't see the stupidity of this, let me rephrase it for you:
Skype is not only preventing status updates [...] [b]oth me and my girlfriend [...] are actually UNABLE TO [change our status from offline to online].
Well duh. Heck, it is currently mismodded at +2, Funny; Maybe people are granting him the benefit of the doubt, I don't know.
PS before you ask I'm married AND know where my wife is. Is that OK with you?
Why would you believe i would have asked that? It seems you require some practice in reading comprehension as well, given that you apparently weren't able to follow the conversation at all...
5 moderation points
Aw, such a low ID and you never got 15 at once?
Well, let's practice reading comprehension a bit, shall we?
TFS says
f(sic) you're signed in to Skype, you will not be able to change your status and your contacts will all show as offline even if they are online. As a result, you won't be able to start Skype calls to them
And now you're complaining that you can't sign in in the first place. Well guess what, /if/ you managed to sign in, you'd in turn be ... signed in. Let's see what TFS has to say about that:
f(sic) you're signed in to Skype, you will not be able to change your status and your contacts will all show as offline even if they are online. As a result, you won't be able to start Skype calls to them
So your complaint is meaningless and obvious to people remotely computer-literate.
(Also, note that the statement starts with "if". Do you understand that "if it is raining today, i'll visit the museum" does not imply that i wouldn't visit the museum were it a sunny day?)
Or is your point that TFS didn't explicitly say "Signed-in users might lose their connection"? Well no shit.
It figures you're a skype user.
And your envy related jokes about the girlfriend were totally unnecessary. You probably still get to point out that you are a poor little thing do not have a girlfriend/boyfriend/dog/octopuss/whatever somewhere.
Is a "no, you!"-kind of reply all you can come up with for a proper comeback? Good grief.
FWIW I prefer to have my partners not "somewhere" but "around". This might seem unorthodox to someone used to hooking up with people over the internet, but maybe you'll find it enjoyable some time in the future, too. Best of luck!
A 3D printed drone that connects to the IoT and has iPhone connectivity with an app that hacks Tesla cars and relies on a webscale database, built by the Maker Community!
Correction: It appears you have only read the first two words of the headline. Sigh.
You're repeating yourself, and yes, we get it, you're very excited about finally having found a girlfriend over the internet.
FWIW, what you're complaining about is right in TFS. It says
As a result, you won't be able to start Skype calls to them.
Try reading more than what you want to read next time. You probably still get to point out that you have a girlfriend!! somewhere.
that the internet was broken today.
a lifetime in prison for anybody caught [writing malware].
You are literally retarded.
an ananomoly
A what?
Way to miss the point.
That means I'm responding to your thread topic.
No shit? I thought that was already clear due to your command being attached to theirs.
The only use for subjects in comments are to deliver subtle or not so subtle out-of-band insults.
I'm curious whether you pass the Sally-Anne Test
Mind giving it a shot?
Huh? I count zero. Oh, maybe it's because of the ad blocker.....
If it's the only method, it's both the most and the least efficient method. Please state the point of your reply.
No, you're conflating efficient with effective. I'm not denying that it is effective. But it isn't efficient.
Are they ignoring the proof-of-work or what? That's not efficient at all. By design.
It only makes more sense if you ignore that you need to create a detailed accoustic profile of that exact keyboard in that exact position before you can interpret the noise...
Some companies test their software being releasing it, instead of expecting their customers to be their beta testers.
Eat some of your own dog food and proofread your comment before releasing it. You know, that's kind of what preview is for.
yeah we get it, you couldn't program your way out of a wet paper bag if your life depended on it.
Uhh okay, then i completely missed what you were saying. I thought you were bragging with start/stop automatic :).
Never mind.
I guess i should check it out some day, then.
You're saying that like it was a good thing instead of something completely idiotic...
Let's see, you paid extra (implicitly or explicitly) for many times more load on the starter battery and the starter generator (both hence needing replacement earlier), while adding another system that can, and will eventually, fail. At which point it gets even more expensive.
Plus, the (significant) juice required to start the engine will, at the expense of your milage, have to be fed back into the battery.
And this all because it is "environmentally friendly" and "saves gas consumption", i presume you were told when buying the car. Have you ever looked at how much gas an idle engine consumes, or how much it exhausts, for that matter? I suggest you don't, because it will ruin your day.
I'd write something witty but I ra
ESC software will brake the necessary individual wheel(s) (up to three with the most sophisticated systems), so that the vehicle goes the way the driver intends.
Defeating physics if necessary.