With 4e21 addresses each. Or four billion networks with 1e12 addresses each Or...
It's not like you couldn't subnet your address space if you wanted. You only need to stick with the 64/64 split if you want everything(*) to automagically configure itself
Unfortunately this isn't true. It's true for the kids which grew up with computers before they became polished appliances, but those are generally adults now.
To put it in your own retarded words: Thanks, but I did think about what i wrote first. However obviously you must have understood it much better than I, so if you could point me to the part that describes how I personally assume that any particular system was secure, I'd be much ablidged[sic].
No one expects any one system to be 100% fooolproof
I'm pretty sure that's not true. For an example of a safe manufacturer that does expect this, see this very story.
Are you done now making yourself look like an idiot?
They probably didn't imagine their electronic lock to be vulnerable; you'd only install a mechanical backup if you already assume that your primary locking mechanism is not secure. News at 11, "smart" guy.
That's actual not a good way to remember this. You generally turn the lever into the direction in which you are going to turn the steering wheel. Consistency at last!
Slashdot Mirror
And your references are pretty stale.
I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say.
a Cisco recommendation
Maybe here's our problem? :-)
I am 5' 11"
Awww, adorable! A manlet! *pats head*
Slow start
A /56 only allows for 256 networks
With 4e21 addresses each.
Or four billion networks with 1e12 addresses each
Or...
It's not like you couldn't subnet your address space if you wanted. You only need to stick with the 64/64 split if you want everything(*) to automagically configure itself
(*) hosts, anyway. not routers.
and most kids these days do too - even moreso.
Unfortunately this isn't true. It's true for the kids which grew up with computers before they became polished appliances, but those are generally adults now.
....what? there is no way for 'the actual light waves to be coherent' than to have them be of a single wavelength.
holding up the aircraft flaperon that was found and declaring it to be a "badly-damaged" airliner.
Well technically it is. Extremely badly damaged, even.
The one I use does it with a double tap on Numlock. More FreeBSD friendly, I suppose.
The more intelligent people remap it to something useful, because of its extremely good position on the keyboard.
Fun fact: creating user accounts requires superuser access, which you generally don't have on other people's computer.
protip: if you have literally no clue about something, it's best to remain silent.
let the user map it themself
The horror. Letting the user decide what to do with the typically three extra keys? Can't have that.
how do you think precompiled binaries are compiled? with magic pixie dust? so that's not exactly a trade-off
Can it be jammed? Certainly. Is it an allowed thing to do? Hrm, let's ask the FCC?
This isn't about comebacks. For me, anyway.
I guess the irony here is lost on you.
To put it in your own retarded words:
Thanks, but I did think about what i wrote first. However obviously you must have understood it much better than I, so if you could point me to the part that describes how I personally assume that any particular system was secure, I'd be much ablidged[sic].
No one expects any one system to be 100% fooolproof
I'm pretty sure that's not true. For an example of a safe manufacturer that does expect this, see this very story.
Are you done now making yourself look like an idiot?
They probably didn't imagine their electronic lock to be vulnerable; you'd only install a mechanical backup if you already assume that your primary locking mechanism is not secure. News at 11, "smart" guy.
You screwed it up yet again. Here you go
BSD doesn't have "distributions" in the way GNU/Linux does, dear AC. The concept doesn't quite apply.
If the email is here, it is here, and nobody is going to delete it.
Oh, it's actually HTML you say? Great, I didn't want to read that crap in the first place.
I'm using openbsd for all my work
Nice to see more distros do this stuff.
Something tells me you aren't as familiar with the BSDs as you pretend to be. What could it possibly be?
Oho, someone forgot to tick the AC checkbox...
Down = left blinker, up = right blinker
That's actual not a good way to remember this.
You generally turn the lever into the direction in which you are going to turn the steering wheel.
Consistency at last!