Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Demonstrate the World's First White Lasers

An anonymous reader writes: Scientists and engineers at Arizona State University, in Tempe, have created the first lasers that can shine light over the full spectrum of visible colors. The device's inventors suggest the laser could find use in video displays, solid-state lighting, and a laser-based version of Wi-Fi. Although previous research has created red, blue, green and other lasers, each of these lasers usually only emitted one color of light. Creating a monolithic structure capable of emitting red, green, and blue all at once has proven difficult because it requires combining very different semiconductors. Growing such mismatched crystals right next to each other often results in fatal defects throughout each of these materials. But now scientists say they've overcome that problem. The heart of the new device is a sheet only nanometers thick made of a semiconducting alloy of zinc, cadmium, sulfur, and selenium. The sheet is divided into different segments. When excited with a pulse of light, the segments rich in cadmium and selenium gave off red light; those rich in cadmium and sulfur emitted green light; and those rich in zinc and sulfur glowed blue.

118 comments

  1. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It wasn't nanotubes, or 3D printed, or made by Elon Musk??? WTH!?

    1. Re:What? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2

      Yeah, plus it came from a "party school", not one of those elite left or right coast schools

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the color and the shine is the same as Musk's sperm.

    3. Re:What? by idji · · Score: 1

      you forgot a new battery technology or graphite breakthrough!

  2. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long before some asshole points this at a plane and kills everyone on board?

    1. Re:Great by weilawei · · Score: 2

      That escalated quickly. Knee jerk much?

    2. Re:Great by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      because such an accident has actually happened...never

      you might get stomped by a hippo that escaped from your local zoo, why don't you worry about that instead.

    3. Re:Great by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I dunno... Hippos are the most dangerous large animal on the planet. The mosquito is the most deadly small animal I understand.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  3. 'White' light by Kaenneth · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Real full spectrum 'white' light, or just equalized peaks in the spectrum for RGB?

    1. Re:'White' light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind reading the article; it's right in the summary.

    2. Re:'White' light by Khyber · · Score: 1

      EQ Peaks. Three tunable emitter crystals on the same substrate.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:'White' light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The charts in the paper show that, just as with RGB LEDs, it's decidedly peaky and not full-spectrum at all. Other charts in the paper also show how non-linear the green channel is versus joules input (as are red and blue, but much less so).

  4. Laser whut? by JazzXP · · Score: 1

    Isn't the point of a laser that it's a single wavelength? Doesn't this fly in the face of that or am I missing something?

    1. Re:Laser whut? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      This is a tunable multi-wavelength laser with tunable red, green, and blue emitters. This makes it useful for scanning various things with different wavelengths at the same time so you may get multiple measurements at once. Good for protein fluorescence and stuff.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Laser whut? by Temkin · · Score: 1

      Isn't the point of a laser that it's a single wavelength? Doesn't this fly in the face of that or am I missing something?

      Coherence & single wave length. A laser has all the waves in lock step.

    3. Re:Laser whut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it is weird to call something that will not emit coherent light a laser. The neat thing about coherent light is that it literally has a classical field strength of several V/m, whereas incoherent light averages that out.

    4. Re: Laser whut? by goofynewfie · · Score: 1

      It's never really a single wavelength, just a frequency with (originally) a very narrow bandwidth. Very large-bandwidth lasers were developed about 30 years ago, and few-wavelength pulses made using truly white light have been available for nearly 20 years. These are still incredibly useful, as their coherence times are huge, and with the appropriate phase profile over their spectrum they can make near-arbitrary waveforms on a femtosecond-picosecond timescale. The big benefit with this is the miniaturization, scalability, and potential application to imaging.

    5. Re: Laser whut? by JazzXP · · Score: 1

      Thank you, helps expand my non-existent knowledge.

    6. Re:Laser whut? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      the light at each of three frequencies (actually a distribution around a peak for real world lasers) will be coherent. There is also amplification of light by stimulated emission happening. So the device is indeed a laser and you armchair amateurs should just be quiet

    7. Re:Laser whut? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      no the point of a laser is that the actual light waves are coherent.
      the single wavelength is more of a byproduct of the process, albeit a very useful one.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    8. Re:Laser whut? by fisted · · Score: 1

      ....what? there is no way for 'the actual light waves to be coherent' than to have them be of a single wavelength.

    9. Re:Laser whut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No multi-photon light source is purely monochromatic, at the very least because the source has a non-zero temperature. As a result, you can't think of coherence as a binary state in real life, and instead talk about things like coherence length, the distance over which the waves are coherent. For cheap, broad line lasers, this can be as short as 10 cm. For special, narrow linewidth lasers, you can get it into the kilometers range. For ultra short pulses that involve a very wide bandwidth of frequencies, you get very short coherence lengths. But despite the light covering the visible spectrum the light is still coherent because of how short the laser pulse is, and the pulse maintains a specific waveform structure.

  5. Progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'm waiting for the first black laser.

    1. Re: Progress by goofynewfie · · Score: 2

      I've got a CO2 laser you could look into :)

  6. White! by digsbo · · Score: 4, Funny

    These lasers are oppressing other lasers! They need to check their privilege!

    1. Re:White! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for a dark lasers. Shadowing a place with a flashlight would be fun.

    2. Re:White! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. This is some racist BULLSHIT. There needs to be some black lasers.

    3. Re:White! by funwithBSD · · Score: 2

      #darklasersmatter

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    4. Re:White! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you please say AfroAmerican Laser.

    5. Re:White! by Agronomist+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      #darkmatterlasers

      --
      -DwS
  7. WRONG by Khyber · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not the first WLL. Those have been available for at least half a decade.

    This is the first SOLID STATE WLL.

    What's unique is that they figured out a way to grow three different crystals next to each other on the same substrate without having fatal flaws.

    Holy fuck can the editors even be bothered to fact-check?

    Oh, yea, what editors?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half a decade? Try half a century.
      Krypton-Argon lasers have been around since the 1960s. I used them in the 80s for laser shows and they were old hat then.

    2. Re:WRONG by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Krypton-Argon? Those purple-white 8000K+ junkers with a horrible green emissions unless the gas is under low pressure?

      Sure, if you call purple with a tiny bit of green 'white.'

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what kind of crack you're on but the lasers I used would put out between 2 and 4 watts with over 20 lines across the entire visible spectrum. Green was a bit hotter then the rest but it was no 'sickly purple.'

    4. Re:WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supercontinuum lasers have been off the shelf for years now, and provide an actual full spectrum, coherent light source (not tri-color) and are completely solid state. This might be a lot smaller and cheaper, but for research projects needing a bright light source there is already equipment out there, even now with near flat light intensity across visible and nir.

    5. Re:WRONG by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "I don't know what kind of crack you're on but the lasers I used would put out between 2 and 4 watts with over 20 lines across the entire visible spectrum."

      http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/w... - Uhhh, what? I'm certainly not counting 20+ lines there.

      Also, a measly 4 watts? I've got nearly double that in my pocket laser.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That laser needs better better optics. The coatings on the end mirrors set which possible lines will be active. We had a bunch of reds, three or four yellows, a bunch of greens, a few blues and a violet or two.

  8. Not white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    So it's not white, it's tri-colour.

    1. Re:Not white by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Tri-band, multi-color, tunable.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Not white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So's the monitor you're staring at. And?

    3. Re:Not white by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      So it's not white, it's tri-colour.

      considering that's how it's always worked, yes

    4. Re:Not white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only white to humans then.

    5. Re:Not white by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      They are French?!

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    6. Re:Not white by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I'm a tetrachromat, you insensitive clod!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re:Not white by idji · · Score: 1

      You have tri-color cones in your eyes. So this is white as far as your human eye can see.

    8. Re:Not white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Not white by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      lol

  9. Just what the world needed by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    A racist laser, literally white power.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Just what the world needed by ArylAkamov · · Score: 0

      Finally, a laser that only provides white power.

    2. Re: Just what the world needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shitlord, its worse than that. The fucking 'scientists' (all men I might add) slaved three lasers of color
      (LoC) together forcing them to act white. This oppression to wipe out the beautiful LoC culture is literally rape.

    3. Re:Just what the world needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to get around to making a black laser.

      benefits seem endless imagine being able to shut up so many slashdot commentators at once...

      And the physics of such a device would have to be pretty neat also.

  10. Summary is inaccurate by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary is inaccurate, or at least confusing. The summary says "lasers that can shine light over the full spectrum of visible colors", but the article says that this is three monochromatic spikes, red, green, blue, which together appear white. It also says that the choice of colors is tunable... but tunable lasers aren't new.

    The summary also implies that it is "a" laser, but the article makes it clear that what they did is make three separate lasers on the same substrate (specifically "three parallel segments, each supporting laser action in one of three elementary colors.")

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Summary is inaccurate by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2

      If the red, green and blue lasers can be 'tuned' for intensity then it can produce colors in the RGB colorspace, which is not necessarily the "full spectrum of visible colors"

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    2. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Jumunquo · · Score: 2

      For light, doesn't RGB cover the entire visible colorspace?

    3. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not necessarily. While these emitters are tunable, I doubt the red is getting down to 700nm, or the blue going into the 400-410nm violet range. Most RGB emitters, even tunable are peak 630nm red and 450-460nm blue. So this wouldn't cover the entire visible colorspace very accurately when it came to deeper reds and violets.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those were my thoughts. I knew a guy who had a multi-color laser (More than 3 color, I think it was 5) that could do the same things and more. I fail to see what the big deal here: merging multiple laser beams can easily accomplish this (you need optics that effect the different lasers differently, but its doable).

    5. Re:Summary is inaccurate by guises · · Score: 2

      They're also not LASERs (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation), but are rather laser diodes. Am I being too picky when I notice that? Electrical engineers tend to get annoyed when I point out that their version of lasers aren't real lasers.

    6. Re:Summary is inaccurate by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Not quite, but it's close enough to provide the illusion that it does. The discrepancy is easily seen by holding a picture of the blue sky up to the actual blue sky. In a side-by-side comparison you can see that the color is only approximate.

    7. Re:Summary is inaccurate by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Am I being too picky when I notice that?

      Yeah.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:Summary is inaccurate by guises · · Score: 1

      I'm not following your point. You have linked to a wiki article discussing one component of a laser. Does that... no, I just don't get it.

    9. Re: Summary is inaccurate by geogob · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are. The you are right to say that the origin of the name comes from a method to produce light with those specific characteristic. But very few to non device still use this method today.

      Gas cavity laser, laser diodes, chemical laser, etc. all do not pass in your restricted vision of what a laser ist. But long has been established to call laser a device that creates light with coherent characteristics as did the first early LASERs.

      In your world, it would be wrong to call a car a car because there are nor horses in front of it.

      And, by the side, the word laser is now in the oxford dictionnary. Not only it has a definition, but also its not (only) an accronym anymore, so uppercase is not called for in general use. Which leads back to your point: someone talking of a laser diode is correct; not someone talking about a LASER diode.

    10. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it covers three wavelengths.

      The reason that you seem to be able to produce all colors in between is that human eyes have three types of color receptors with different spectral response curves. With three well chosen colors (red, green, blue) it's possible to invoke the same responses in the eye als a wide range of full spectra such as we encounter everywhere would produce. That's why RGB displays work so well.

      But if you use this for illumination it's a different story. A light bulb or the sun produce wavelengths all over the visible spectrum. A colored surface has it's own spectral reflection curve and will perhaps reflect wavelengths all over the spectrum in different proportions. The combined effect of the light source spectrum, the reflection curve and the response curves of the receptors in your eyes determine what color you see.

      If you illuminate this surface with an RGB source that seems to have the same color als this light bulb or the sun the reflection of just three wavelengths determines the result and that may be quite different from what a full spectrum light source would result in. Different full spectrum light sources have different results too, of course, I've once seen an abstract painting on someones wall change dramatically while it got darker outside and in proportion more light illuminating the painting came from lamps. The effect was fascinating. While even full spectrum light sources have different effects, a light source with just three wavelengths is too limited to support enough of the nuances present in the colors of all the objects around us. Think of the harsh colors fluorecent lights produce (or used to produce, they can be quite good nowadays), the strange not quite right colors of some white LEDs, and you get an idea of the kind of thing that's missing when you don't have enough wavelengths in a light source. Colors are fuller and more vibrant with full spectrum light sources.

    11. Re:Summary is inaccurate by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Yes, laser process is happening in laser diodes. The electrical engineers are annoyed at your astounding ignorance of the subject

    12. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary, article and GP also all refer to them not as LASERs, but as lasers (dictionary word not acronym). Perhaps the electrical engineers were annoyed by your failing to notice the difference. For reference, in speech you can distinguish LASERs from lasers by consistently referring to the former as "fricking LASERs".

    13. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your exact definition of visible colorspace.
      If you're thinking about the perception of this color space then yes, it will cover largely everything perceptable.
      If you're talking about the actual spectrum of visible light (so the continuum from about 400nm to about 800nm) then no, only 3 actual frequencies will be present and the rest of the band will be empty.

    14. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diode lasers are still lasers, they still have light amplified by stimulated emission of radiation, and still require a population inversion and enough minimum power to transition from just emitting light to lasing. They involve a small resonance cavity (although there are plenty of single pass lasers of other types), and are as much real lasers as any other kind of gas or solid state laser.

    15. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Examples of active laser media include:

      Semiconductors, e.g. gallium arsenide (GaAs), indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs), or gallium nitride (GaN).[4]"

      So yes, semiconductors, AKA LEDs, ARE usable for a lasing medium.

      So yes, it IS a LASER.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    16. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their laser is not tunable in the normal sense of lasers. They can independently pump the three colors, and tune the output spectrum in the same way a monitor can tune the output color of a pixel. But the color of each individual component is not tunable. For solid state lasers, actual wavelength tuning involves either temperature changes (but this is limited to over a ~5 nm range at most), or some sort of mechanical arrangement that allows changing the physical dimensions of the resonant cavity, or even just stacking together a whole bunch of different lasers modules (like this but less space efficient, and with many more colors), possibly with a broadband amplifier.

    17. Re:Summary is inaccurate by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. R, G, B are three points that form a triangle and using different combinations you can produce any color found in the triangle. However the total visible light available to humans is not shaped like a triangle, so no matter how well R, G, and B fit into the "corners" of human vision there are still other colors that they couldn't reproduce. Here's a chart that shows this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    18. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're also not LASERs (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation), but are rather laser diodes. Am I being too picky when I notice that? Electrical engineers tend to get annoyed when I point out that their version of lasers aren't real lasers.

      If you'd bothered to click through and look at the actual article, you'll see they really are lasers, not laser diodes.

    19. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. It tricks the human eye into perceiving it the same, but it is not the same.

    20. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have access to blue sky at the moment -- can you take a picture of this supposed difference and post it? Thanks.

    21. Re:Summary is inaccurate by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Art class was so very very long ago, likely before you were a mote in your father's eye, actually. I never took any of the arts classes in college - I did take creative writing and music classes which served to fill my prerequisites. Anyhow, I may be wrong. Isn't black the presence of all colors and white the absence of any color?

      I could see using the RGB to create black but how does one manage to get a true white? It seems (I did not even do more than skim the summary) that there would need to be some filtering involved or multiple lasers.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    22. Re: Summary is inaccurate by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I still get a wee bit finicky about the word "MODEM" being thrown about. The is no cable modem nor DSL modem. In both cases the signal remains digital. MODEM is MOdulation and DEModulation. Whilst trivial it still irks me a little tiny bit but not enough to actually comment on it most of the time. That and, well, the options are a bit clunky to type or to say. Still, I prefer to use the word router, I suppose.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    23. Re: Summary is inaccurate by geogob · · Score: 1

      I do not know for DSL devices, but DOCSIS cable "modem" really are modem. The modulate/demodulate various flavours of QAM, depending on the version.

    24. Re: Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gas cavity laser, laser diodes, chemical laser, etc. all do not pass in your restricted vision of what a laser ist. But long has been established to call laser a device that creates light with coherent characteristics as did the first early LASERs.

      Gas lasers, laser diodes, and chemical lasers all employ stimulated emission of light to get that coherent light. They are all lasers in the strict (well only...) definition. It is more clear when you see them employed as amplifiers or seeded oscillators, where there is an external source of light. But regardless, the process is the same as the the original origins with a ruby laser. The emission process is the same and the differences comes down to medium used, pumping method, etc.

    25. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read up on the difference between subtractive and additive colors. Paint is subtractive, where mixing together more pigments removes more and more of the spectrum. Light is additive, where adding more colors brings you closer to a white spectrum.

    26. Re: Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that might be just because of your bizarre misunderstanding of what modulation means.

    27. Re: Summary is inaccurate by KGIII · · Score: 1

      How true. I had forgotten about those. Thanks - statement corrected in my head. ;)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  11. Well by p0p0 · · Score: 1

    Someone get the sharks. This is as good as it gets.

    1. Re:Well by Jumunquo · · Score: 1

      Sharks are endangered. Is seabass ok?

    2. Re:Well by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Must be great white sharks, though.

    3. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if the seabass are bad-tempered. Extremely bad-tempered!

  12. Leica did this first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using a system of tubes in the fibre optic, they spread the spectrum of a red laser:
    http://www.leica-microsystems.com/science-lab/white-light-laser/

    So white (aka broad spectrum) lasers are not new.

  13. Even party schools get top notch talent by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 2

    With the lack of jobs for PhD's in academia (and elsewhere), ANY academic job gets tons of applicants. Only the best of the best get *any* job in academia nowadays.

    You can pretty much count on anyone in the US who has a faculty job being one of the best of the best. Furthermore, this person is going to have access to plenty of cheap PhD labor.

    Don't be surprised if you see pretty significant accomplishments coming from previously disregarded places.

    1. Re:Even party schools get top notch talent by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      Apparently you missed my inherent snarkiness, having attended said "party school" and encountered prejudiced behavior like the GP refers to.
      Not that anybody from Berkeley has ever behaved that way ;)

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    2. Re:Even party schools get top notch talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best of the best, of those with no aspirations in life

    3. Re:Even party schools get top notch talent by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      I attended that school (and department) also and can only count maybe 5 parties in as many years. As teachers would say, you get out of your education what you put into it.

      They had great equipment thanks to major facilities of Intel and Motorola being two miles away.

    4. Re:Even party schools get top notch talent by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      I considered the academic path, but rejected it as too high-risk. Instead I went into IT support, where I knew I could be confident of always finding employment - albeit at low pay.

      The plan worked: I'm now employed as an underpaid helpdesk-monkey, have had the same job for the best part of a decade, and could have it a decade still.

    5. Re:Even party schools get top notch talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time, before Reaganomics and the rise of the neocon crazies and the war on workers (and on work), that scientists and academics were actually looked up to in this country. So were people who made things. We didn't have the tech to put people into space for instance, so we invented it, and in the process invented whole new industries--and people prospered for it.

      Now we measure success by how many people we don't employ and by how much stuff we don't make. No wonder life is basically stagnant and most change these days is all about how someone is trying to put you out of work or otherwise make your life worse.

    6. Re:Even party schools get top notch talent by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 2

      Dude, study up. I went the same path 15 years ago, right when the Dot Com crash happened. I studied my ass off, got a job doing the monkey thing, found cram schools to teach at, and as soon as I finished off my CCNP I've been employed ever since. I've got MCSEs in NT4, 2000, 2003, and Exchange, CCNA, CCNP R/S, CCNA security, working on CCIE written now (not a cheap test to study for, I'd have gotten it already, but spent years trying not to pay for study materials- the one month I've spent since ponying up has seen me get further than the past 5 years combined), and a few other certs.

      The trick is to NOT brain dump. Use the exams as a self test. Especially the Cisco stuff. The CCNA test bank is like 1000 questions. CCNP isn't much fewer. It's far easier (IMO) to know the stuff than to cram the questions (although I've met plenty of offshore people who have crammed it all in, and are now 100% useless)

      Your other option is to go down the Project Management side of things. I know a guy who did the monkey thing for 15 years, was facing layoffs and got his PMP. He is now the star Project Manager in the company who gets all the failing projects because he is the one guy who can turn them around. He does say he faces a ceiling not having a 4 year degree. But he is also facing ageism for being 55+ (He has had a very interesting and colorful life)

      In other words, get off your butt, and show some motivation. If not, you'll end up like other people I've known that got laid off and could never find another job to save their lives. If you do, you'll NOT be lowly paid.

    7. Re:Even party schools get top notch talent by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1, Funny

      But hey, our academics are the best in the world at identity politics technology. Its researchers have added an unprecedented number of new letters and symbols to that gender preference string, making it the DNA of the anti-DNA world.

    8. Re:Even party schools get top notch talent by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Actually, scientists and academics have historically not gotten much respect. During and after WWII, there was a strong feeling that we needed science in the Cold War and Space Race, and they got a burst of respect, which seems to have run out. Anti-intellectualism runs deep in the US psyche.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re: Even party schools get top notch talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me guess: you don't recognise any aspirations that don't involve making bucket loads of money?

      I did a phd. I aspired to a job in research nut wasn't good enough to get into academia proper despite trying for years (think very part time work, applying for everything that had an application for and living in the cheapest dumps money can't buy). Eventually I gave up on my aspirations and got a money making job instead. I consider it a failure to achieve my aspirations, though being able to afford stuff is a nice consolation prize.

  14. Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    White lasers are racist! We need Affirmative Action for Lasers!

  15. This would look really cool by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you've ever played with a normal monochrome laser in a dark room, you'll have seen how laser illumination makes things look speckly. Illuminating with this "white" laser will make superimposed speckly in three colours, with the locations of the speckles not coinciding, so it would be iridescent speckly.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:This would look really cool by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I have noticed the speckly too, but could not work out the mechanism behind it.

    2. Re:This would look really cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're seeing an interference pattern.

      with the locations of the speckles not coinciding, so it would be iridescent speckly.

      It might also act as speckle contrast reduction through wavelength diversity. Although chances are the wavelengths differ by too large an amount.

    3. Re:This would look really cool by Misagon · · Score: 1

      So that means that up close, an image projected with these laser devices would look somewhat like a Pointilism painting?
      I am not sure that I would disapprove, actually.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    4. Re:This would look really cool by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      Not just a projected image, but anything it illuminates (so long as there is little other illumination to mess up the effect.)

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  16. lasers that can shine light over the full spectrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um, no, that shines 3 wavelengths of light.

  17. And... by WSOGMM · · Score: 3, Funny

    in other related news, researchers tightly focus light bulb light. They contend that their invention should have a wide spectrum of uses, but critics argue that their results aren't coherent.

  18. This article is misleading and bad journalism by nashv · · Score: 1

    It was discussed since yesterday over on Reddit and the authors of the original paper even arrived to provide clarifications. That's how bad this article linked here is.
    See the reddit discussion here:
    https://www.reddit.com/r/scien...

    --
    Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
  19. Pure selenium? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    "What?!?! No! No one EVER made them like this!!"

  20. dat's rayciss by mix_left_and_right · · Score: 1

    uh huh

  21. Frickin laser beams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For albino sharks?

  22. White Laser? by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Isn't that some kind of Privilege?

    Is Jesse Jackson going to get involved?

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  23. Great White Lasers by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Great White Lasers! Finally they're getting them on the sharks!

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  24. It's an RGB laser, not a white laser. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a big difference. It's not full spectrum.

  25. This is not a "full spectrum" laser by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    It is a discrete laser that can emit three distinct wavelengths.

  26. Actually, not even technically a laser by slew · · Score: 1

    While this first proof of concept is important, significant obstacles remain to make such white lasers applicable for real-life lighting or display applications. One of crucial next steps is to achieve the similar white lasers under the drive of a battery. For the present demonstration, the researchers had to use a laser light to pump electrons to emit light. This experimental effort demonstrates the key first material requirement and will lay the groundwork for the eventual white lasers under electrical operation.

    The thing they made is probably best thought of as nano-interleaved resonator cavity for a laser diode (which needs to have certain band gaps to emit the light). Apparently for this proof of concept, they actually had to excite this nano-structured cavity, with an actual laser. These nano-structures couples the energy to desired tunable optical wavelengths which are nano-interleaved and thus allows emission of "white" light from the laser diode structure.

    As far as I can tell, the breakthrough is to manufacture these nano-structures (nano-wires or nano-sheets) on the same substrate near each other (nano-spaced). To do this they developed a ion-substitution process which allows them to build the nano-wire structure with one material with certain lattice constants and later replace atoms to create a different lattice constant (changing the resonant wavelength of the structure), This alllowed them to make "blue" which generally so different than "red" that it previously needed to be fabricated with a different structure (making it hard to make nano-structures next to each other).

  27. The Ferguson Laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Racist.

  28. Re:WTH? by peacefool · · Score: 1

    It's all about lasers, but no mentioning of ze sharks. Highly disappointing...