The only way, to end up with the same value, is to enter the same inputs
Or one of the infinite number of other possible inputs that will produce the same hash. But please go on educating us on this matter. I mean how hard can it be, right?
This entire thread is a fucking trainwreck but your comment takes the cake. Hashing with a key?! Hashing locally and sending the hash to the server so that it compares hashes? Then your hash is the damn password and you're back at sending your password to the server, who stores it in plaintext. Yay.
Right, because Apple's magic robot will instead take the piece of outdated junk, remove its pieces of outdated junk parts, and turn them into state of the art components used to assemble a shiny new phone.
Traditional recycling: I'll sell my old iphone to someone who wants it.
This recycling: I'll give back my device to apple, feeling good in the process, so apple can sell more brand new devices, eliminating the 2nd hand market.
shoveling the walk or mowing the yard [...] peaceful time in the outdoors
Both activities (especially mowing the lawn) involve loud, annoying noises, that's not what I consider peaceful time outdoors. Plus it doesn't "accomplish" much, all things considered. You mow the lawn in order for it to look neat, other than that, it has no value. You shovel the sidewalk so people don't break their necks on it and potentielly sue your ass, i.e. it's a proactive safety measure. You have accomplished tidying up something that's bound to become untidy again in the near future, at which point you'll have to rinse and repeat. Where is the accomplishment?
Literally the only good thing I could get out of mowing the lawn was that freshly cut grass has a nice smell. But I could have had that in an easier way.
Whether you loathe the time or not is up to you - but there are things you have to do in life whether you want to or not - the piece that is up to you is whether you find a way to enjoy those things.
We've been over this a hundred times, dad. It only works in theory, or if you're really good at kidding yourself.
No. I'm not a teen anymore, but not/that/ far away from it; you're simply mistaken. There is no fun in, say, doing the dishes, laundry, sweeping the sidewalk, etc. Specifically there isn't even a way to do those things "right" in the sense that it starts being fun.
Of course, if you want it to be really secure you write protect the system partition after you install it. (This generally means, in Linux, that you need to create a bunch of hard links from your system partition to another partition that you allow writes to, so that, e.g., the/tmp directory can be written to. I'm not sure anymore what the BSD equivalent to that is.
It's called different mount points. And on Linux, I doubt the super user cannot just remount the partition read-write again (don't know about OpenBSD, but NetBSD prevents this with the securelevel concept)
I think start/stop is questionable at best. My car consumes.6L (that's.15 gallons) of gas per hour of idling. An hour of idling at traffic lights etc is a lot of start/stop cycles causing wear on the starter motor/magnet switch and all related moving part, as well as consuming significant juice from the battery that the alternator has to resupply (which means increased gas consumption while driving). I'm not sure whether it's a net positive or net negative, but I suppose even if it eventually saves you a negligible amount of energy, eventually the starter will need to be replaced which would completely dwarf the saved energy.
Start/stop is popular because people don't think it through. Marketing knows that. Engineers implementing these systems probably get a good laugh out of it. Garages approve.
35 percent [...] said they were on the site to find a specific fact. 33 percent said they were looking for an overview of a topic, while 32 percent said they wanted to get information on a topic in-depth.
So that leaves us with 0% who just wanted to go down that random rabbit hole, as the headline says. Seems legit.
The Windows registry exists as a place for applications to store their configuration settings.
That's maybe 1% of what the registry is/does. Overall it's a massive, undocumented, intentionally obfuscated, hundreds of MB large pile of shit. There's so much ROT13 in it, it's not even funny anymore (but fear not, this is only used in security-relevant places.
Also, what does *that* have to do with dependencies?
The usual way is that the bouncer keeps track of the chat history per channel and synthesizes a configurable amount (last 1k messages, all messages this month, whatever) of PRIVMSGs.
You're talking not to a user of Windows but instead to a user who collaborates with other team members who use Windows and tries to convince said team members to switch from Slack, Skype, or Discord to a combination of some IRC server and client, a bouncer, and a pastebin. They are accustomed to a user experience that integrates IRC, bouncer, and pastebin.
Seems like a hopeless battle, especially if those users are non-technical people.
But what is the specification for client to bouncer communication for the actions of reviewing and searching chat history? And what is the specification for client to pastebin communication? Among SFTP, FTPS, and WebDAV over HTTPS, which is preferred?
Yes, IRC is underspecified. Or to answer the actual questions, I don't care. I don't need client to pastebin communication (and if I needed it it would be one command alias away), I don't use a bouncer either. Also I never intended to propose a ready-for-granny solution that your (obviously non-technical) team members are satisfied with. On the other hand, it shouldn't be difficult to come up with something that does the job well enough since decent clients, decent bouncers and decent "pastebin clients" exist.
Slashdot Mirror
The only way, to end up with the same value, is to enter the same inputs
Or one of the infinite number of other possible inputs that will produce the same hash. But please go on educating us on this matter. I mean how hard can it be, right?
You poor thing. Let me dissect those 11 possibilities for you, in an attempt to find the one that matches the context of password authentication:
Single responsibility principle, a concept in computer science
Hmm. Could that be it? Does "single responsibility principle" sound related to "password authentication"? Hard to tell, but I think it doesn't.
Secure Remote Password protocol, a protocol for authentication
Hmm. Could that be it? Does "secure remote password, a protocol for authentication" sound related to "password authentication"? No way.
Server Routing Protocol, a network protocol used by the BlackBerry Enterprise Server middleware
Hmm. Could that be it? Does "server routing" sound related to "password authentication"? Hard to tell, but I think it doesn't.
Spatial Reuse Protocol, MAC-layer protocol for ring-based packet internetworking
Hmm. Could that be it? Does "ring-based packet internetworking" sound related to "password authentication"? Hard to tell, but I think it doesn't.
Stream Reservation Protocol, reservation of network resources for specific streams across a bridged LAN
Hmm. Could that be it? Does "stream reservation" sound related to "password authentication"? Hard to tell, but I think it doesn't.
Session Request Protocol, a communication protocol used internally by the USB On-The-Go standard
Hmm. Could that be it? Do "USB OTG sessions" sound related to "password authentication"? Hard to tell, but I think it doesn't.
Stack Resource Policy, a resource allocation policy used in real-time computing to prevent deadlocks and multiple priority inversion
Hmm. Could that be it? Does "prevent[ing] deadlocks and multiple priority inversion"? Hard to tell, but I think it doesn't.
SCSI RDMA Protocol, for transferring SCSI commands and data
Hmm. Could that be it? Does "transferring SCSI commands and data" sound related to "password authentication"? Hard to tell, but I think it doesn't.
Synchronous reactive programming, a programming paradigm
Hmm. Could that be it? Does a programming paradigm sound related to "password authentication"? Hard to tell, but I think it doesn't.
System restore point, an historical snapshot in a computer operating system
Hmm. Could that be it? Does "system restore" sound related to "password authentication"? Hard to tell, but I think it doesn't.
Software Restriction Policies, also known as "SAFER", a policy built into Microsoft Windows XP and newer versions
Hmm. Could that be it? Does software restriction in Windows XP sound related to "password authentication"? Hard to tell, but I think it doesn't.
Yeah, impossible to tell. This shit is hard, let's go shopping.
This entire thread is a fucking trainwreck but your comment takes the cake. Hashing with a key?! Hashing locally and sending the hash to the server so that it compares hashes? Then your hash is the damn password and you're back at sending your password to the server, who stores it in plaintext. Yay.
Do you pay upfront when eating in a restaurant?
Right, because Apple's magic robot will instead take the piece of outdated junk, remove its pieces of outdated junk parts, and turn them into state of the art components used to assemble a shiny new phone.
Wall of text
Looks like the Apple device you're posting from too is broken, you should turn it in for part salvation.
Traditional recycling: I'll sell my old iphone to someone who wants it.
This recycling: I'll give back my device to apple, feeling good in the process, so apple can sell more brand new devices, eliminating the 2nd hand market.
that is the future
For the next how many weeks?
shoveling the walk or mowing the yard [...] peaceful time in the outdoors
Both activities (especially mowing the lawn) involve loud, annoying noises, that's not what I consider peaceful time outdoors. Plus it doesn't "accomplish" much, all things considered. You mow the lawn in order for it to look neat, other than that, it has no value. You shovel the sidewalk so people don't break their necks on it and potentielly sue your ass, i.e. it's a proactive safety measure. You have accomplished tidying up something that's bound to become untidy again in the near future, at which point you'll have to rinse and repeat. Where is the accomplishment?
Literally the only good thing I could get out of mowing the lawn was that freshly cut grass has a nice smell. But I could have had that in an easier way.
Whether you loathe the time or not is up to you - but there are things you have to do in life whether you want to or not - the piece that is up to you is whether you find a way to enjoy those things.
We've been over this a hundred times, dad. It only works in theory, or if you're really good at kidding yourself.
Housework is fun when it's done right.
No. I'm not a teen anymore, but not /that/ far away from it; you're simply mistaken. There is no fun in, say, doing the dishes, laundry, sweeping the sidewalk, etc. Specifically there isn't even a way to do those things "right" in the sense that it starts being fun.
Making a modification like that to your car's electronic control systems is nearly certain to void your insurance.
Who, besides you, is talking about making a modification to anyone's car's electronic control systems?
You know, [...]
Yeah I know what insurance is.
[goes on and on and on]
Yes, whatever. Why are you telling me that?
Of course, if you want it to be really secure you write protect the system partition after you install it. (This generally means, in Linux, that you need to create a bunch of hard links from your system partition to another partition that you allow writes to, so that, e.g., the /tmp directory can be written to. I'm not sure anymore what the BSD equivalent to that is.
It's called different mount points. And on Linux, I doubt the super user cannot just remount the partition read-write again (don't know about OpenBSD, but NetBSD prevents this with the securelevel concept)
Hard links won't help you in any way.
I think start/stop is questionable at best. My car consumes .6L (that's .15 gallons) of gas per hour of idling. An hour of idling at traffic lights etc is a lot of start/stop cycles causing wear on the starter motor/magnet switch and all related moving part, as well as consuming significant juice from the battery that the alternator has to resupply (which means increased gas consumption while driving). I'm not sure whether it's a net positive or net negative, but I suppose even if it eventually saves you a negligible amount of energy, eventually the starter will need to be replaced which would completely dwarf the saved energy.
Start/stop is popular because people don't think it through. Marketing knows that. Engineers implementing these systems probably get a good laugh out of it. Garages approve.
That is not what 'permanent' means.
Momentum != Energy.
E = 1/2 * m * v^2
p = m * v
HTH
Drugs are helluva drug.
Oh yes and the target still has to voluntarily submit to a facial scan.
Why does it have to be voluntarily?
It's obviously using your AOL.
35 percent [...] said they were on the site to find a specific fact.
33 percent said they were looking for an overview of a topic, while
32 percent said they wanted to get information on a topic in-depth.
So that leaves us with 0% who just wanted to go down that random rabbit hole, as the headline says. Seems legit.
The point where the Big Bang happened is everywhere.
You're an idiot.
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void) {
puts("You lost.");
return 0;
}
Total processing time: .0002 us.
Ready for next task. _
-AI
Except it doesn't because there are too many cars.
The Windows registry exists as a place for applications to store their configuration settings.
That's maybe 1% of what the registry is/does. Overall it's a massive, undocumented, intentionally obfuscated, hundreds of MB large pile of shit. There's so much ROT13 in it, it's not even funny anymore (but fear not, this is only used in security-relevant places.
Also, what does *that* have to do with dependencies?
review and search chat history.
The usual way is that the bouncer keeps track of the chat history per channel and synthesizes a configurable amount (last 1k messages, all messages this month, whatever) of PRIVMSGs.
You're talking not to a user of Windows but instead to a user who collaborates with other team members who use Windows and tries to convince said team members to switch from Slack, Skype, or Discord to a combination of some IRC server and client, a bouncer, and a pastebin. They are accustomed to a user experience that integrates IRC, bouncer, and pastebin.
Seems like a hopeless battle, especially if those users are non-technical people.
But what is the specification for client to bouncer communication for the actions of reviewing and searching chat history? And what is the specification for client to pastebin communication? Among SFTP, FTPS, and WebDAV over HTTPS, which is preferred?
Yes, IRC is underspecified. Or to answer the actual questions, I don't care. I don't need client to pastebin communication (and if I needed it it would be one command alias away), I don't use a bouncer either. Also I never intended to propose a ready-for-granny solution that your (obviously non-technical) team members are satisfied with. On the other hand, it shouldn't be difficult to come up with something that does the job well enough since decent clients, decent bouncers and decent "pastebin clients" exist.