This is why I deal with equipment where I can A) crossship (bonus points for letting me ship the drive faceplate instead of the whole thing) and B) swap the drive out myself.
This has been solved by everyone not following tutorials from the 80s asking them to use xhost + to allow everyone everywhere to connect to your display.
Of course, it requires systemd-moused, systemd-keyboardd, systemd-windowd, systemd-X11d, and finally systemd-logind. Right now there's some compatibility issues that have been in the bug tracker for a year or so, so for best results you should also ditch KDE or gnome and go with systemd-windowd-managerd and systemd-menud. There's a few incompatible apps as well, if you have problems try using systemd-webbrowserd (requires systemd-networkd) and systemd-xtermd (requires systemd-fontd and systemd-shelld). Thunar works fine though for browsing files, as long as they're in the systemd folder.
They shot first, they eroded the trust to a point where people, not criminals or terrorists or pedophiles but ordinary law abiding people have stood up and said "we don't trust the government any more, nor the systems in place to protect our privacy, and so we have to take it into our own hands."
If they're looking for a zone of lawlessness, they should check under their own feet first.
If the argument is that I as a consumer have a right to not have my ISP discriminate against my choice of content providers then where in that argument is the limiting principle that prevents me from forcing the content providers to provide the content on a device of my choosing rather than theirs?
Clearly these are exactly identical situations despite the fact that in the network neutrality argument there is a third party (the ISP) interfering with my choice of content provider, while in your argument there is no ISP interfering in my choice of content provider. The total and complete lack of third-party interference in your case (which is entirely what network neutrality is about) is what makes it different.
Clearly it's a violation of the separation of powers. Only the judicial branch can decide reality, like the judge ruling that deepwater horizon spilled 3.19 million barrels of oil.
Thank you for taking the time to apply to our job. Unfortunately we are not able to extend an offer of employment to you as we feel you are overqualified for this position. Thank you for your interest.
his next bonus will suffer resulting in him not benefiting
Unless his next quarter is a negative bonus where he has to pay his ill-gotten gains back, he gets $10000 for hitting this quarter's target and gets only $1000 next quarter. As opposed to only getting $1000 both quarters. The behavior is a no-brainer.
He could later be considered for termination if the pattern continues.
Unless he's high enough up AND his behavior drives the company into bankruptcy, then the gets a $50000 retention bonus to help ensure his leadership through these tough times.
After the fucking the internet has gotten by the NSA during this and the previous administration, I think it'd be more appropriate if Obama was to "kibbitz" with youporn stars.
Don't worry, even if you're arrested they'll make sure it's for something entirely distinct from the reason your property is seized, like resisting arrest.
Hell, I'm sure you could arrange for a demonstration: get 5 people to line up. Person one (we'll call him Adam) hands a box wrapped in paper that says "To Bob" to the next person who rips off that layer of paper to show another layer "To Charlie" and hands it to the next person and so on. Then point out that the feds can't see what's in the box, and if the feds look at the box between Charlie and David they can only see that the box came from Charlie and is going to David, but they can't see that it came from Adam or is going to Emily.
Run it again with a cop standing in for Bob and David and show that by comparing notes, Bob knows they got a box from Adam and gave it to Charlie, and David knows he got a box from Charlie at the same time and gave it to Emily. Point out that Adam doesn't know who any of the people are, their computer picks people at random and sometimes the cops get lucky.
<strike>Then point out that if you're the NSA you can use PRISM to track down everyone who handled that box</strike>
As a PHP developer I can tell you exactly where one huge bottleneck is: POST-Redirect-GET. The current paradigm for handling POST requests requires that I initialize my framework, load all my objects, create a new object, save it in the database then set fire to the whole thing and tell the browser to redirect to another page where I initialize my framework, load all the objects, recreate the object I just burned down and plug it into the relevant view.
Not being able to respond to a POST request with a view with a "if the user wants to bookmark this page or reload it, please GET this Location: instead" doubles the number of requests I have to serve and halves my throughput.
Nice try, but you're doing it wrong. I don't pay to send the internet.
Ending network neutrality would be more like you paying to ship me something overnight express, but unless I pay on top of what you already paid to send me the package, the package gets shipped media mail. No, you don't get your money back. Yes, you're paying for a service you have no hope of receiving.
Our state allows wealthy drivers to pay extra for the convenience and speed of the Express Lane.
When your state installed this "Express Lane" did it actually add a new lane, or did they wall off existing lanes, forcing everyone who doesn't pay up into fewer lanes than they had before, making the traffic for everyone else worse?
Slashdot Mirror
Now I'm curious what happend to Case1, Case2, and Copy of copy of case3 [8].doc.
This is why I deal with equipment where I can A) crossship (bonus points for letting me ship the drive faceplate instead of the whole thing) and B) swap the drive out myself.
This has been solved by everyone not following tutorials from the 80s asking them to use xhost + to allow everyone everywhere to connect to your display.
systemd-screenlockerd saves the day!
Of course, it requires systemd-moused, systemd-keyboardd, systemd-windowd, systemd-X11d, and finally systemd-logind. Right now there's some compatibility issues that have been in the bug tracker for a year or so, so for best results you should also ditch KDE or gnome and go with systemd-windowd-managerd and systemd-menud. There's a few incompatible apps as well, if you have problems try using systemd-webbrowserd (requires systemd-networkd) and systemd-xtermd (requires systemd-fontd and systemd-shelld). Thunar works fine though for browsing files, as long as they're in the systemd folder.
If they're looking for a zone of lawlessness, they should check under their own feet first.
You want <ecode>:
Clearly these are exactly identical situations despite the fact that in the network neutrality argument there is a third party (the ISP) interfering with my choice of content provider, while in your argument there is no ISP interfering in my choice of content provider. The total and complete lack of third-party interference in your case (which is entirely what network neutrality is about) is what makes it different.
Clearly it's a violation of the separation of powers. Only the judicial branch can decide reality, like the judge ruling that deepwater horizon spilled 3.19 million barrels of oil.
Dear Dimit:
Thank you for taking the time to apply to our job. Unfortunately we are not able to extend an offer of employment to you as we feel you are overqualified for this position. Thank you for your interest.
Sincerely,
HR
Unless his next quarter is a negative bonus where he has to pay his ill-gotten gains back, he gets $10000 for hitting this quarter's target and gets only $1000 next quarter. As opposed to only getting $1000 both quarters. The behavior is a no-brainer.
Unless he's high enough up AND his behavior drives the company into bankruptcy, then the gets a $50000 retention bonus to help ensure his leadership through these tough times.
After the fucking the internet has gotten by the NSA during this and the previous administration, I think it'd be more appropriate if Obama was to "kibbitz" with youporn stars.
It goes in the evidence locker until the driver finishes their trial for possession.
It goes in the evidence locker until the driver finishes their trial for possession.
It goes in the evidence locker until the driver finishes their trial for possession.
It goes in the evidence locker until the driver finishes their trial for possession.
It goes into impound until the driver finishes their trial for possession.
What's that? You can't be bothered with a court case to prove that anything illegal happened? Well, fuck you.
The "drug dog alerted on his car outside the view of the dash cam"
The drug dogs will simply be re-branded as kiddy porn dogs, and your cash will have trace amounts of 10 year old on them.
Don't worry, even if you're arrested they'll make sure it's for something entirely distinct from the reason your property is seized, like resisting arrest.
One with user-writable locations not mounted noexec?
Every single hung jury that prosecutors don't retry?
"It only takes one to hang" - so the saying goes.
"The" geek? There's only one?
Hell, I'm sure you could arrange for a demonstration: get 5 people to line up. Person one (we'll call him Adam) hands a box wrapped in paper that says "To Bob" to the next person who rips off that layer of paper to show another layer "To Charlie" and hands it to the next person and so on. Then point out that the feds can't see what's in the box, and if the feds look at the box between Charlie and David they can only see that the box came from Charlie and is going to David, but they can't see that it came from Adam or is going to Emily.
Run it again with a cop standing in for Bob and David and show that by comparing notes, Bob knows they got a box from Adam and gave it to Charlie, and David knows he got a box from Charlie at the same time and gave it to Emily. Point out that Adam doesn't know who any of the people are, their computer picks people at random and sometimes the cops get lucky.
<strike>Then point out that if you're the NSA you can use PRISM to track down everyone who handled that box</strike>
As a PHP developer I can tell you exactly where one huge bottleneck is: POST-Redirect-GET. The current paradigm for handling POST requests requires that I initialize my framework, load all my objects, create a new object, save it in the database then set fire to the whole thing and tell the browser to redirect to another page where I initialize my framework, load all the objects, recreate the object I just burned down and plug it into the relevant view.
Not being able to respond to a POST request with a view with a "if the user wants to bookmark this page or reload it, please GET this Location: instead" doubles the number of requests I have to serve and halves my throughput.
So sorry, but you paid for "up to overnight express"
The homeowners association demands that unless every single house has a TARDIS in their front yard, yours must go.
Nice try, but you're doing it wrong. I don't pay to send the internet.
Ending network neutrality would be more like you paying to ship me something overnight express, but unless I pay on top of what you already paid to send me the package, the package gets shipped media mail. No, you don't get your money back. Yes, you're paying for a service you have no hope of receiving.
Our state allows wealthy drivers to pay extra for the convenience and speed of the Express Lane.
When your state installed this "Express Lane" did it actually add a new lane, or did they wall off existing lanes, forcing everyone who doesn't pay up into fewer lanes than they had before, making the traffic for everyone else worse?
The real problem is that when archive.org gets sued into oblivion over this it's going to take the good stuff with the bad.
Hilariously, after reading this story I've now got a banner ad on slashdot for CocoaVia.