Yes, it is a political statement. But it's by some guy who doesn't like Sen. Santorum. Stopping that page would be like taking away his right to free speech.
eliminating mention of both santorum and Senator Santorum, does an even worse disservice to history by removing his legitimate accomplishments as well as the voice of his opposition.
Wikipedia is meant to represent a non-biased view of people, places, and things. The anti-Santorum page you mentioned does not even try to make you believe that it is a fair and balanced view of Sen. Sanotorum. If I were to research Sen. Sanotorum for some reason, I would not use the page you mentioned but rather expect to find honest, non-biased information about him in Wikipedia: good and bad. Removing truthful information about Sanotorum that could be seen as negative by him or others is attempting to revise history or hide the truth.
Re:Master of the obvious!
on
Mitnick on OSS
·
· Score: 1
Oh, I should add that I'm not anti-Mitnick or that people shouldn't listen to what he says (since I personally believe we should listen to what everyone has to say). And the story about his ventures in hacking and eventual demise are really fun reads, even if your not in to the whole "hacking" scene.
Re:Master of the obvious!
on
Mitnick on OSS
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
I think the parent, and many others, wish they had some fame, a good job, and other such things. Nice try, though.
Wow, I have a better job than Mitnick, make more $$$ per year than him, don't have to fret with the fame, and I still think he knows less about hacking in todays world than I do. And I've never hacked a system in my life! But your like most lemmings today who believe that if a person roams around talk shows and writes some books on hacking that it he/she must be the defacto guru of hacking. Please. Thats like saying somebody that robbed banks 60 years ago are all-knowing-pros at how to rob the high tech banks of today. Time changes, and with it so do people.
Actually, you can target the internet very easily. We will take Slashdot or any other web medium that allows users to comment on news. Psyops officers and paid contractors could work daily to post counter-messages to any discenting view about , say, the War in Iraq. This includes lying, spreading FUD, and posting links for people to "go get their facts straight". The links go to sites that, guess what, support their view 100%. It is very easy for them (the Pyops officer or contractor) to find these sites since they are owned or contracted by the DoD (often through various sub-contractors).
The GOP did something similar a few years back for the presidental elections. Howard (the Scream) Dean had this supposed huge following by people on the internet. Suddenly, out of nowhere, hundreds of blogs showed up supporting Bush/Cheney. This would, under normal circumstances, seem nothing odd except for the fact that many of these blogs were owned by only a handful of "special interests" groups. Now why the hell, as an individual, would you want more than one blog? The GOP, unlike their Democrat rivals, also do not use the idea of the "cosistant message". This is a message that all senators, talk show hosts, and radio personnel who support the GOP have to say on a given day or event. By spreading a similar message it gives the appearance to common folk that a majority of people feel one way on a given topic.
Now, we must understand that this is not new for the DoD to be engaged in propoganda wars on its own people. This was done, what, like every war? I think it stinks and if weren't for Bush breaking the law with the wiretapping crap, I think this would be just water under the bridge. But I think people are really starting to wonder if our government is taking it just a little too far...
I am sick and tired of every other week some self-proclaimed "expert" will predict Googles next big move. Sorry, please forgive me but I think I lost it somewhere back there with the Google browser or the Google operating system. I get the same thing reading articles about Ruby. People don't see that the big Ruby craze is generated by book publishers and writers who are unable to find a new title for the next.NET or Java book. Hell, Ruby has been around much longer than both. What next: C will become the new "hot" programming language? Geez. Go peddle your "Web 2.0" crap somewhere else thankyou.
A jumbo jet is also more valuable than a ticket to ride on one.
So which is more valuable, a passenger on a jumbo jet or the jumbo jet? I'm sure since you couldn't get the parent post's concept you'll go for the hunk of metal.
Now, I've heard a lot of talk among people of the ACLU being a crazy leftist organization
Its funny how the world changes. Being a "righty" or conservative usually meant you were all for smaller government and less government envolvement.
Heres my list on how to be a good Republican. All you have to do is hate everyone on it:
1) Hillary Clinton (satan lives) 2) Bill Clinton (mini-me) 3) NPR 4) ACLU 5) PBS 6) CNN (go watch real news over at Murdock's Fox News) 7) Any actor or actress with a political view that is not Arnold 8) Courts (they legislate from the bench you know) 9) People who sue other people or companies 10) Christians (they are hard to convert to Protestants, can't figure out birth control, and listen to people who sleep with young boys). 11) Any female who is rich and famous on her own (ie Martha Stewart) 12) Any one who talks about racism in America (only white males are oppressed) 13) People who view Iraq as a losing cause 14) People who worry about being spied on by our government (they are hiding something anyways)
the more Firefox will be diminished as greater numbers of tools are grafted onto it.
I don't think you understand. AllPeers is an extension. It is not a part of the Firefox browser. It is not created by the Mozilla team. Mozilla has made no plans to take this outside product and graft it to Firefox.
Extensions are an option. Firefox will continue as is: a web browser. If you don't want them, a good idea is to not add them.
Re:The real 90s versus outdated 00s software
on
Java Is So 90s
·
· Score: 1
now, c (and c++) strike back, giving the power to php, python and the others to use selects, poll or any other event completion api.
Umm, I don't think it was a c and c++ strike back. Java's virtual machine is written mostly in c/c++ and it achieves its "power" from them just like LAMP languages do.
but java will not die, as a forecast, i think it will end up like cobol, where the programmers who really stayed at using it will maintain solutions of bigger companies not willing to change the running system.
True. But I also see Java as a language that is currently evolving thanks oddly enough to Microsoft and RoR. Microsoft's.NET got Sun off their asses to improve the language and look at how slowly they were adopting new ideas. Sun copied ideas from.NET just as.NET original cloned C# off of Java. And Java is currently seeing gained interest in being the base for scripting languages with the eventual adoption of Groovy and Beanshell. RoR has those numerious oversized and complicated Java web frameworks questioning their design and starting again with the idea of keeping it simple.
Logical fonts are the five font families defined by the Java platform which must be supported by any Java runtime environment: Serif, SansSerif, Monospaced, Dialog, and DialogInput. These logical fonts are not actual font libraries. Instead, the logical font names are mapped to physical fonts by the Java runtime environment. The mapping is implementation and usually locale dependent, so the look and the metrics provided by them vary. Typically, each logical font name maps to several physical fonts in order to cover a large range of characters.
A physical font is what you should use to ensure the same font is used across platforms. And since each platform might not have that font, you should probably include it yourself.
In the documentation about fonts, the generic usage of "monospace" results in the JVM finding the most appropriate font it considers fit that description for the platform it is running on. There is no "monospace" font on every platform, nor "serif" or "sans serif" for that matter. This means that you are not going to get a monospaced font 100% of the time on different platforms. If you absolutely want to ensure you have the same monospaced font with your app, just include your own own true type font with your app and use it instead.
OS X Cocoa applications are the most consistant and well-integrated around, and you can write them in Objective-C, Java, Ruby, and I'm sure many others that I haven't cared to look into (I just write an Objective-C wrapper usually).
Last time I looked Cocoa, like Carbon, are Mac-exclusive: http://developer.apple.com/cocoa/. There is GNUStep, which is like a Cocoa lite. Sadly its just a GUI, and not a very optimized one at that in my opinion.
1. Open Synaptic 2. Click checkboxes for the software you want 3. Click apply Seems fairly easy already without mono, doesn't it?
Yeah, I'm sure grandma can figure this one out: screenshot
Synaptic reminds me of the package installer that Ximian has/had. I'm sure it has the same issues like language dependencies, requiring autoconf/automake packages for every program in order to build it, a centralized databases for keeping track of all the packages, people to update databases, does not allow you to download proprietary runtimes like Sun's JVM, etc, etc, etc. Its a nice thought but not what average users want to stare at or try to figure out to get Application X to install and run. Putting a gui around apt-get has been around for awhile and doesn't seem to be "catching on" with users.
Now, taking your comparison of Synaptic supposed ease compared to Mono:
1) I download Mono program X.exe from site X with Firefox. 2) I then open it from Firefox's download manager.
This is taking into account that the following exists on my computer:
1. Mono is installed. 2. Association between X.exe and the Mono runtime in Firefox.
The reason for not using languages like Dylan or D:
1. They are programming languages. Mono is not a programming language, rather a generic runtime. This allows for programmers using their favorite programming language to create working parts for a desktop that are compatible with other parts possibly written in another language.
2. "Pre-compiled" applications require people to download source code, compile, link, and install for their particular platform. This is probably the #1 reason why average users avoid Linux. Most Windows users screech when they see the command prompt. With Mono we could get away from that and deploy just the applications.
3. Most advanced runtimes, like Mono, perform pretty darn good. I don't know if I would create the next Quake in it, but it sure as hell can handle a word processor or other desktop application just fine. And despite what you or anyone else might want to say they often times are more reliable.
Re:Torvalds is right. Avoid GNOME use KDE!
on
Torvalds Says 'Use KDE'
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
I have one problem, and its with your screenshot of a Gnome desktop and the comment about toolbars. There are two applications in there that appear to be both Mozilla and OpenOffice. Both of these applications, from what I know, do not use the Gnome widget sets in preference for their own. I believe you will have this same problem with these applications on other desktops like KDE. I know both running on Windows look different from the other Windows apps.
As for the various different programming languages on Linux I can say that I think people should use Mono exclusively. A Qt# would be nice to see (if its not out there already). And before someone goes bashing me about the.NET stuff, note that this is coming from a long-time Java and C developer. I think that with Mono, the Linux desktop can grow without people having to load 20 different runtimes to get app X to run. Hell, I'm running Windows XP right now and have Python, Perl, Tcl/Tk, Java, and the.NET framework on my box to run various applications. That is stupid. I think everyone should focus on improving Mono and adding language X in to it.
Also, Mono should stop trying to mimic Microsoft's implementation. Screw them. Make a break and improve. I played around with it a bit and found it silly that on Linux it was compiling assemblies into files with the extensions ".exe" or ".dll". To hell with crossplatform. We need one framework that can run assemblies from many languages.
No I fucking didn't say the raw media files were the attachments. Anyone who has used email knows that large file attachments are bad news. Your not the first genius to stumble upon that. Well, actually you were more concerned over the silly MIME stuff and missed the obvious to most dumb ass.
Doesn't work that way. Overflow is to write into a memory space that is somehow executed upon. You have to have a "jump" from some executing thread in order to get the exploit code to execute. But it doesnt have to be the program it was injected in to to run the code. Thats when it gets scary.
I wasn't thinking of sending the actual raw file as part of the email. MIME issues are the least of the limitations with that since most mail servers don't allow for attachments over a few megs. I was thinking more along the lines of sending URLs that include a unique key to allow the special Thunderbird extension I spoke of to download the audio/video file and send it to the iPod. Sweet.
Yeah, Lotus Notes tabbing sucks. My current employer uses it and it drives me nuts. Not a feature I would like to see in Thunderbird. What I would really like to see in Thunderbird is plugins (extensions) for sync'ing with phones and PDAs. Hell, I have a better idea: how about an iPod sync where you can transfer emails AND media file attachments to an iPod. That would be cool. You could remove the whole iTunes store and have stores that send out purchased media files via email attachments. That would kick ass. And it would be nice to see those emails/news groups postings on the iPod too.
I think its probably in TW/AOL best interest to work with BOTH Microsoft and Google. Ofcourse, TW/AOL is not known for its bright business decisions in the past.
Agreed. I have watch telecoms do some really rotten things to get legal precedence: they sue themselves. Well, not directly by name but rather by a specially funded 3rd party or contacts through FCC. Why? Well, image your telecoms A, B, and C and really would prefer there not be any competition. Then theres this startup telecom called Vonage that risks forcing telecoms A, B, and C of having to reduce costs to compete. So you press for a special feature only they have. Something like Extended 911. You then pocket some senators to yell and scream that E911 needs to be mandatory to ensure the safety of god fearing, hard working Americans. Okay, FCC gets yelled at by said senators and takes telecoms A, B, and C to court. Telecoms A, B, and C cry and moan for about two minutes and then give in to the FCC's demands that they use Extended 911. This new legal precedence ofcourse also effects Vonage. Vonage is screwed because only Telecoms A, B, and C have E911 and they are not allowed to the party.
But what is considered "xxx" type material? Do we have to follow the American view of what is adult content? And if the Christian Right finally gains full control of the U.S. government, do people around the world have to conform to the Protestent extremists view?
Slashdot Mirror
Yes.
Some people consider that a political statement,
Yes, it is a political statement. But it's by some guy who doesn't like Sen. Santorum. Stopping that page would be like taking away his right to free speech.
eliminating mention of both santorum and Senator Santorum, does an even worse disservice to history by removing his legitimate accomplishments as well as the voice of his opposition.
Wikipedia is meant to represent a non-biased view of people, places, and things. The anti-Santorum page you mentioned does not even try to make you believe that it is a fair and balanced view of Sen. Sanotorum. If I were to research Sen. Sanotorum for some reason, I would not use the page you mentioned but rather expect to find honest, non-biased information about him in Wikipedia: good and bad. Removing truthful information about Sanotorum that could be seen as negative by him or others is attempting to revise history or hide the truth.
Oh, I should add that I'm not anti-Mitnick or that people shouldn't listen to what he says (since I personally believe we should listen to what everyone has to say). And the story about his ventures in hacking and eventual demise are really fun reads, even if your not in to the whole "hacking" scene.
I think the parent, and many others, wish they had some fame, a good job, and other such things. Nice try, though.
Wow, I have a better job than Mitnick, make more $$$ per year than him, don't have to fret with the fame, and I still think he knows less about hacking in todays world than I do. And I've never hacked a system in my life! But your like most lemmings today who believe that if a person roams around talk shows and writes some books on hacking that it he/she must be the defacto guru of hacking. Please. Thats like saying somebody that robbed banks 60 years ago are all-knowing-pros at how to rob the high tech banks of today. Time changes, and with it so do people.
The GOP, unlike their Democrat rivals, also do not use the idea of the "cosistant message".
:)
Oh crap I'm tired. Okay, that does it: I'm done for the day.
Actually, you can target the internet very easily. We will take Slashdot or any other web medium that allows users to comment on news. Psyops officers and paid contractors could work daily to post counter-messages to any discenting view about , say, the War in Iraq. This includes lying, spreading FUD, and posting links for people to "go get their facts straight". The links go to sites that, guess what, support their view 100%. It is very easy for them (the Pyops officer or contractor) to find these sites since they are owned or contracted by the DoD (often through various sub-contractors).
The GOP did something similar a few years back for the presidental elections. Howard (the Scream) Dean had this supposed huge following by people on the internet. Suddenly, out of nowhere, hundreds of blogs showed up supporting Bush/Cheney. This would, under normal circumstances, seem nothing odd except for the fact that many of these blogs were owned by only a handful of "special interests" groups. Now why the hell, as an individual, would you want more than one blog? The GOP, unlike their Democrat rivals, also do not use the idea of the "cosistant message". This is a message that all senators, talk show hosts, and radio personnel who support the GOP have to say on a given day or event. By spreading a similar message it gives the appearance to common folk that a majority of people feel one way on a given topic.
Now, we must understand that this is not new for the DoD to be engaged in propoganda wars on its own people. This was done, what, like every war? I think it stinks and if weren't for Bush breaking the law with the wiretapping crap, I think this would be just water under the bridge. But I think people are really starting to wonder if our government is taking it just a little too far...
I am sick and tired of every other week some self-proclaimed "expert" will predict Googles next big move. Sorry, please forgive me but I think I lost it somewhere back there with the Google browser or the Google operating system. I get the same thing reading articles about Ruby. People don't see that the big Ruby craze is generated by book publishers and writers who are unable to find a new title for the next .NET or Java book. Hell, Ruby has been around much longer than both. What next: C will become the new "hot" programming language? Geez. Go peddle your "Web 2.0" crap somewhere else thankyou.
Free as in speech, or free as in beer?
Oh, god, please kill yourself for saying that.
A jumbo jet is also more valuable than a ticket to ride on one.
So which is more valuable, a passenger on a jumbo jet or the jumbo jet? I'm sure since you couldn't get the parent post's concept you'll go for the hunk of metal.
Now, I've heard a lot of talk among people of the ACLU being a crazy leftist organization
Its funny how the world changes. Being a "righty" or conservative usually meant you were all for smaller government and less government envolvement.
Heres my list on how to be a good Republican. All you have to do is hate everyone on it:
1) Hillary Clinton (satan lives)
2) Bill Clinton (mini-me)
3) NPR
4) ACLU
5) PBS
6) CNN (go watch real news over at Murdock's Fox News)
7) Any actor or actress with a political view that is not Arnold
8) Courts (they legislate from the bench you know)
9) People who sue other people or companies
10) Christians (they are hard to convert to Protestants, can't figure out birth control, and listen to people who sleep with young boys).
11) Any female who is rich and famous on her own (ie Martha Stewart)
12) Any one who talks about racism in America (only white males are oppressed)
13) People who view Iraq as a losing cause
14) People who worry about being spied on by our government (they are hiding something anyways)
Please feel free to add to my list...
the more Firefox will be diminished as greater numbers of tools are grafted onto it.
I don't think you understand. AllPeers is an extension. It is not a part of the Firefox browser. It is not created by the Mozilla team. Mozilla has made no plans to take this outside product and graft it to Firefox.
Extensions are an option. Firefox will continue as is: a web browser. If you don't want them, a good idea is to not add them.
now, c (and c++) strike back, giving the power to php, python and the others to use selects, poll or any other event completion api.
.NET got Sun off their asses to improve the language and look at how slowly they were adopting new ideas. Sun copied ideas from .NET just as .NET original cloned C# off of Java. And Java is currently seeing gained interest in being the base for scripting languages with the eventual adoption of Groovy and Beanshell. RoR has those numerious oversized and complicated Java web frameworks questioning their design and starting again with the idea of keeping it simple.
Umm, I don't think it was a c and c++ strike back. Java's virtual machine is written mostly in c/c++ and it achieves its "power" from them just like LAMP languages do.
but java will not die, as a forecast, i think it will end up like cobol, where the programmers who really stayed at using it will maintain solutions of bigger companies not willing to change the running system.
True. But I also see Java as a language that is currently evolving thanks oddly enough to Microsoft and RoR. Microsoft's
Monospaced, in Java, is a Logical font. See here:
F ont.html
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/awt/
Logical fonts are the five font families defined by the Java platform which must be supported by any Java runtime environment: Serif, SansSerif, Monospaced, Dialog, and DialogInput. These logical fonts are not actual font libraries. Instead, the logical font names are mapped to physical fonts by the Java runtime environment. The mapping is implementation and usually locale dependent, so the look and the metrics provided by them vary. Typically, each logical font name maps to several physical fonts in order to cover a large range of characters.
A physical font is what you should use to ensure the same font is used across platforms. And since each platform might not have that font, you should probably include it yourself.
In the documentation about fonts, the generic usage of "monospace" results in the JVM finding the most appropriate font it considers fit that description for the platform it is running on. There is no "monospace" font on every platform, nor "serif" or "sans serif" for that matter. This means that you are not going to get a monospaced font 100% of the time on different platforms. If you absolutely want to ensure you have the same monospaced font with your app, just include your own own true type font with your app and use it instead.
OS X Cocoa applications are the most consistant and well-integrated around, and you can write them in Objective-C, Java, Ruby, and I'm sure many others that I haven't cared to look into (I just write an Objective-C wrapper usually).
Last time I looked Cocoa, like Carbon, are Mac-exclusive: http://developer.apple.com/cocoa/. There is GNUStep, which is like a Cocoa lite. Sadly its just a GUI, and not a very optimized one at that in my opinion.
1. Open Synaptic 2. Click checkboxes for the software you want 3. Click apply Seems fairly easy already without mono, doesn't it?
Yeah, I'm sure grandma can figure this one out: screenshot
Synaptic reminds me of the package installer that Ximian has/had. I'm sure it has the same issues like language dependencies, requiring autoconf/automake packages for every program in order to build it, a centralized databases for keeping track of all the packages, people to update databases, does not allow you to download proprietary runtimes like Sun's JVM, etc, etc, etc. Its a nice thought but not what average users want to stare at or try to figure out to get Application X to install and run. Putting a gui around apt-get has been around for awhile and doesn't seem to be "catching on" with users.
Now, taking your comparison of Synaptic supposed ease compared to Mono:
1) I download Mono program X.exe from site X with Firefox.
2) I then open it from Firefox's download manager.
This is taking into account that the following exists on my computer:
1. Mono is installed.
2. Association between X.exe and the Mono runtime in Firefox.
Pretty simple.
The reason for not using languages like Dylan or D:
1. They are programming languages. Mono is not a programming language, rather a generic runtime. This allows for programmers using their favorite programming language to create working parts for a desktop that are compatible with other parts possibly written in another language.
2. "Pre-compiled" applications require people to download source code, compile, link, and install for their particular platform. This is probably the #1 reason why average users avoid Linux. Most Windows users screech when they see the command prompt. With Mono we could get away from that and deploy just the applications.
3. Most advanced runtimes, like Mono, perform pretty darn good. I don't know if I would create the next Quake in it, but it sure as hell can handle a word processor or other desktop application just fine. And despite what you or anyone else might want to say they often times are more reliable.
I have one problem, and its with your screenshot of a Gnome desktop and the comment about toolbars. There are two applications in there that appear to be both Mozilla and OpenOffice. Both of these applications, from what I know, do not use the Gnome widget sets in preference for their own. I believe you will have this same problem with these applications on other desktops like KDE. I know both running on Windows look different from the other Windows apps.
.NET stuff, note that this is coming from a long-time Java and C developer. I think that with Mono, the Linux desktop can grow without people having to load 20 different runtimes to get app X to run. Hell, I'm running Windows XP right now and have Python, Perl, Tcl/Tk, Java, and the .NET framework on my box to run various applications. That is stupid. I think everyone should focus on improving Mono and adding language X in to it.
As for the various different programming languages on Linux I can say that I think people should use Mono exclusively. A Qt# would be nice to see (if its not out there already). And before someone goes bashing me about the
Also, Mono should stop trying to mimic Microsoft's implementation. Screw them. Make a break and improve. I played around with it a bit and found it silly that on Linux it was compiling assemblies into files with the extensions ".exe" or ".dll". To hell with crossplatform. We need one framework that can run assemblies from many languages.
Your right. We should just cover these things up like stinky poo and ignore that they exist. That will make them go away!
No I fucking didn't say the raw media files were the attachments. Anyone who has used email knows that large file attachments are bad news. Your not the first genius to stumble upon that. Well, actually you were more concerned over the silly MIME stuff and missed the obvious to most dumb ass.
Doesn't work that way. Overflow is to write into a memory space that is somehow executed upon. You have to have a "jump" from some executing thread in order to get the exploit code to execute. But it doesnt have to be the program it was injected in to to run the code. Thats when it gets scary.
I wasn't thinking of sending the actual raw file as part of the email. MIME issues are the least of the limitations with that since most mail servers don't allow for attachments over a few megs. I was thinking more along the lines of sending URLs that include a unique key to allow the special Thunderbird extension I spoke of to download the audio/video file and send it to the iPod. Sweet.
Yeah, Lotus Notes tabbing sucks. My current employer uses it and it drives me nuts. Not a feature I would like to see in Thunderbird. What I would really like to see in Thunderbird is plugins (extensions) for sync'ing with phones and PDAs. Hell, I have a better idea: how about an iPod sync where you can transfer emails AND media file attachments to an iPod. That would be cool. You could remove the whole iTunes store and have stores that send out purchased media files via email attachments. That would kick ass. And it would be nice to see those emails/news groups postings on the iPod too.
Oh crap! You mean we are running out of .com addresses? Maybe we should just add a couple more address extensions like IP6. Like:
www.slashdot.com.us.technology
That sure will keep cybersquatters busy guessing.
I think its probably in TW/AOL best interest to work with BOTH Microsoft and Google. Ofcourse, TW/AOL is not known for its bright business decisions in the past.
Agreed. I have watch telecoms do some really rotten things to get legal precedence: they sue themselves. Well, not directly by name but rather by a specially funded 3rd party or contacts through FCC. Why? Well, image your telecoms A, B, and C and really would prefer there not be any competition. Then theres this startup telecom called Vonage that risks forcing telecoms A, B, and C of having to reduce costs to compete. So you press for a special feature only they have. Something like Extended 911. You then pocket some senators to yell and scream that E911 needs to be mandatory to ensure the safety of god fearing, hard working Americans. Okay, FCC gets yelled at by said senators and takes telecoms A, B, and C to court. Telecoms A, B, and C cry and moan for about two minutes and then give in to the FCC's demands that they use Extended 911. This new legal precedence ofcourse also effects Vonage. Vonage is screwed because only Telecoms A, B, and C have E911 and they are not allowed to the party.
But what is considered "xxx" type material? Do we have to follow the American view of what is adult content? And if the Christian Right finally gains full control of the U.S. government, do people around the world have to conform to the Protestent extremists view?