Not crashing is essential to successfully running an airline. If the sensors are truly critical, it is the airlines' fault that they are not paying better attention to the random people that have access to their planes.
People steal music. Morons inject poorly tagged/named music into those channels for various reasons (they change the artist to one they are familiar with, to promote their band, or to promote a band they like, they are lazy when transferring from CD, and so on).
If that were true, I would have finished reading the summary and been left with a vague sense that I found the writer to be a likable fellow, whereas in reality I became mildly irritated and scrolled down to see if any of the comments made more sense.
I was actually thinking more about the portion of babies that are unintentional (and perhaps the additional portion that are intentional but represent poor economic choices) than I was thinking about maximizing the number of full term babies. I'm presuming that many of the babies born to young mothers are indeed unintentional, but I'm sure that many of the intentional babies are not well thought out.
My thought was that the babies not born don't really represent a cost to the mother (because it wasn't something she desired or planned), so it sets aside a bunch of thorny issues regarding society dictating individual behavior, and handing out millions of condoms costs about as much as the care for 1 extreme high risk premature baby...
As a user of Firefox, that's fine with me (the entire point of the certificate system is to provide security; in that context, features and convenience are lower priorities than actually providing security).
Basically, my neighbor's paper house is not a good reason for me to leave my doors unlocked.
Government itself is a slippery slope (there is always going to be someone extreme on each side of an issue). You mean that you don't like this because it goes too far.
You are drunk on stupid. Fantastic drugs (aspirin, ibuprofen, loratadine, Diphendydramine, etc.) are available for anyone to buy, for peanuts (an hours wages buy's a months supply of most of those) and Walmart gives many antibiotics away for free, if you have a prescription.
There is plenty of room for improvement in pricing, but your characterization of the situation is hilarious.
What are you talking about? Google doesn't care about how many people are using their browser, they care about how many people are looking at their ads.
They want Firefox+Chrome+other-default-to-google-search-browers to have as much market share compared to non-default-to-google browsers as possible. They could give a shit if it comes via Chrome or not (I doubt that Chrome is even tangentially part of strategic planning, it is probably much more a result of the rather open corporate culture (open in the sense that people work on things that are interesting to them, rather than simply on what the management structure specifies)).
Just learn how to build a good still (and perhaps how to brew beer; brewing the precursor for fuel is pretty easy though, you don't care how it tastes). You will be far more useful than the mechanics.
In the first world, some big chunk of the premature births are children of young, poor, single mothers. That suggests that intervening before conception would be a straightforward way to reduce premature births (I'm not suggesting that they should be prevented from having children, I'm suggesting that they are a high risk group that could be encouraged to delay having children until a time when there is less apparent risk).
Using a high port number is like parking in an empty part of a parking lot. It adds a small amount of inconvenience, reduces the likelihood of an incident, but fails to mitigate any of the consequences of an incident that does happen.
Slashdot Mirror
And all the people you mentioned either tend brown, yellow or liberal, so where's the problem, right?
Also, an effective Muslim detector would awful hard to actually build.
Not crashing is essential to successfully running an airline. If the sensors are truly critical, it is the airlines' fault that they are not paying better attention to the random people that have access to their planes.
So you are angry that they patented a feature that no sane person would ever want to use?
Do you keep your rented TV in the garage?
"usage does" is still way better style than "it's use".
Yes, but it is wholly knew. Historically, people have always treated each other with fairness and respect.
The first rule of violent global revolution club is that you do not talk about violent global revolution club.
Ubuntu ate my cat.
Tell someone who works at a circus that this is the latest thing and they will punch you right in the viral.
People steal music. Morons inject poorly tagged/named music into those channels for various reasons (they change the artist to one they are familiar with, to promote their band, or to promote a band they like, they are lazy when transferring from CD, and so on).
For example:
http://free.house.cx/~eil/etc/notal_list.html
I was going to go with "Have you contacted Apple to let them know you have become self aware?"
If that were true, I would have finished reading the summary and been left with a vague sense that I found the writer to be a likable fellow, whereas in reality I became mildly irritated and scrolled down to see if any of the comments made more sense.
I was actually thinking more about the portion of babies that are unintentional (and perhaps the additional portion that are intentional but represent poor economic choices) than I was thinking about maximizing the number of full term babies. I'm presuming that many of the babies born to young mothers are indeed unintentional, but I'm sure that many of the intentional babies are not well thought out.
My thought was that the babies not born don't really represent a cost to the mother (because it wasn't something she desired or planned), so it sets aside a bunch of thorny issues regarding society dictating individual behavior, and handing out millions of condoms costs about as much as the care for 1 extreme high risk premature baby...
As a user of Firefox, that's fine with me (the entire point of the certificate system is to provide security; in that context, features and convenience are lower priorities than actually providing security).
Basically, my neighbor's paper house is not a good reason for me to leave my doors unlocked.
Thank you Captain Literal.
Or is it Conan the Grammarian?
You are entirely happy with her decision not to sleep with you?
Government itself is a slippery slope (there is always going to be someone extreme on each side of an issue). You mean that you don't like this because it goes too far.
You are drunk on stupid. Fantastic drugs (aspirin, ibuprofen, loratadine, Diphendydramine, etc.) are available for anyone to buy, for peanuts (an hours wages buy's a months supply of most of those) and Walmart gives many antibiotics away for free, if you have a prescription.
There is plenty of room for improvement in pricing, but your characterization of the situation is hilarious.
I don't know, I'm pretty sure that the correct, absurd-literal-minded interpretation of 'part of a parking lot' is more than a single empty space.
I do agree that most people park in empty spaces.
What are you talking about? Google doesn't care about how many people are using their browser, they care about how many people are looking at their ads.
They want Firefox+Chrome+other-default-to-google-search-browers to have as much market share compared to non-default-to-google browsers as possible. They could give a shit if it comes via Chrome or not (I doubt that Chrome is even tangentially part of strategic planning, it is probably much more a result of the rather open corporate culture (open in the sense that people work on things that are interesting to them, rather than simply on what the management structure specifies)).
Just learn how to build a good still (and perhaps how to brew beer; brewing the precursor for fuel is pretty easy though, you don't care how it tastes). You will be far more useful than the mechanics.
Your definition of breathing is stupid.
In the first world, some big chunk of the premature births are children of young, poor, single mothers. That suggests that intervening before conception would be a straightforward way to reduce premature births (I'm not suggesting that they should be prevented from having children, I'm suggesting that they are a high risk group that could be encouraged to delay having children until a time when there is less apparent risk).
Using a high port number is like parking in an empty part of a parking lot. It adds a small amount of inconvenience, reduces the likelihood of an incident, but fails to mitigate any of the consequences of an incident that does happen.