From a medical perspective, being built like Lou Ferigno isn't particularly healthy, there is a point where extra lean mass is a negative for your heart.
The article doesn't make any claims about the legitimacy of the Iliad or the Odyssey as historical documents. It simply states that there are depictions in the books that can be matched to history.
I'm 6 feet tall (this is above average), slightly overweight (by BMI and my own estimate) and have a 36 inch waist. I have at least a medium build, so I'm not some surprising low outlier or anything.
It provides context. Most coming of age rituals are essentially absurd (from the outside), but they advertise, both to the participant and the community, that there are new expectations of that person.
I love how you rant against the partisans on the other side and argue from the point of view that the only way someone could disagree with you is if they have no morals.
It's just so awesomely a result of rear compartment head storage.
Wouldn't it be expected for a ginned up account of a fake guy to include events from real history? I mean, if you are writing a neat story and the sky gets all dark, you might think it would be neat to include that in your story.
I'm not trying real hard to argue yes or no about whether he existed, I am pointing out that the historical accuracy of parts of the Bible does little to establish its legitimacy.
Low melanin production is a mutation beneficial to people living in northern climates because...wait for it...it helps them produce more vitamin D during the winter months.
There is good evidence for their being multiple original populations in Africa, of varying skin tones, so who knows where Caucasians came from. It isn't something that wobbles around in 100 generations, or something that has mattered much for the last 1000 years.
You are essentially saying that a leading company with a large market share should not be allowed to add features to their product.
A better analogy would be an upstart Cola maker coming out with a new drink that had some new stimulant in it that was better than caffeine (but somehow un-patentable) and saying that Coke is not allowed to use that stimulant in any of their products because it would make it too hard for the upstart to gain business.
I get the argument that the selection of browsers might be better, or have more whizbang features, I just don't buy the argument that a new company has more of a 'right' to the new market than an entrenched player.
You credit here with far to much homogeneity. For instance, there are plenty of folks who write software and are pretty right wing and/or libertarian (I don't do all three).
I still don't see how it is unfair to call IE3,4,5,6 'features' of the OS, it isn't as if Microsoft charged a lot of money for them (I don't remember if they charged for the Unix versions).
So by induction, you are not an expert in project management. How do you know that the project managers you have worked with have not been a long string of bad luck leading you to believe that they work very hard to get the things they do done even though they (possibly!) do next to nothing?
Slashdot Mirror
Check it out:
http://www.slate.com/id/2191412/
Smokers behavior indicates that many of them don't mind the taxes, or at least indirectly benefit from the taxes.
Personally, I'm waiting for DaveV2.0 to show up, but here is a relatively serious argument against a historical Jesus:
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/articles/jesus_myth_history.htm
Blather about that article here:
http://www.reddit.com/info/1dnsg/comments
Not everybody prefers big and plastic, I object to your proposed standard.
From a medical perspective, being built like Lou Ferigno isn't particularly healthy, there is a point where extra lean mass is a negative for your heart.
Considering thinking of all taxes as a bad idea, but classifying some of them as necessary.
Thanks.
The article doesn't make any claims about the legitimacy of the Iliad or the Odyssey as historical documents. It simply states that there are depictions in the books that can be matched to history.
Not that much proportionately larger.
I'm 6 feet tall (this is above average), slightly overweight (by BMI and my own estimate) and have a 36 inch waist. I have at least a medium build, so I'm not some surprising low outlier or anything.
It provides context. Most coming of age rituals are essentially absurd (from the outside), but they advertise, both to the participant and the community, that there are new expectations of that person.
I love how you rant against the partisans on the other side and argue from the point of view that the only way someone could disagree with you is if they have no morals.
It's just so awesomely a result of rear compartment head storage.
Wouldn't it be expected for a ginned up account of a fake guy to include events from real history? I mean, if you are writing a neat story and the sky gets all dark, you might think it would be neat to include that in your story.
I'm not trying real hard to argue yes or no about whether he existed, I am pointing out that the historical accuracy of parts of the Bible does little to establish its legitimacy.
I believe the proper term is "SPF Aluminum".
Low melanin production is a mutation beneficial to people living in northern climates because...wait for it...it helps them produce more vitamin D during the winter months.
There is good evidence for their being multiple original populations in Africa, of varying skin tones, so who knows where Caucasians came from. It isn't something that wobbles around in 100 generations, or something that has mattered much for the last 1000 years.
If they had destroyed the market, there would be no Opera. You need to argue that they harmed the market.
Don't forget about slashdot@gmail.com and s.l.a.s.h.d.o.t@gmail.com.
Also s.l.a.s.h.d.o.t+your_mom@gmail.com.
Just register "wasgmail.com" and set it up to redirect you to GooglehosenOktoberfestenwienerschnitzelemailen.com
You are essentially saying that a leading company with a large market share should not be allowed to add features to their product.
A better analogy would be an upstart Cola maker coming out with a new drink that had some new stimulant in it that was better than caffeine (but somehow un-patentable) and saying that Coke is not allowed to use that stimulant in any of their products because it would make it too hard for the upstart to gain business.
I get the argument that the selection of browsers might be better, or have more whizbang features, I just don't buy the argument that a new company has more of a 'right' to the new market than an entrenched player.
You credit here with far to much homogeneity. For instance, there are plenty of folks who write software and are pretty right wing and/or libertarian (I don't do all three).
Won't that change history?
I still don't see how it is unfair to call IE3,4,5,6 'features' of the OS, it isn't as if Microsoft charged a lot of money for them (I don't remember if they charged for the Unix versions).
I think he must have just gotten a bad sunburn.
That, or somebody said something about his pa.
So by induction, you are not an expert in project management. How do you know that the project managers you have worked with have not been a long string of bad luck leading you to believe that they work very hard to get the things they do done even though they (possibly!) do next to nothing?
They can buy them and have them resolve to nothing, or they can let someone else buy them and have them resolve to hardcore pornography.
Not buying them is a lot more embarrassing.
Can you make that judgment without being an expert in both?
It's what Netscape was worried about...
The idea that bundling a web browser into an operating system is anti-competitive is why I call it a theory.
At this point, if a company tried to ship a consumer operating system without a web browser, they would be laughed out of the computer business.