Most people who care to, especially the police, know who the drug dealers are. Anyone who has never met a drug dealer has led a more sheltered life than I have, and that is an accomplishment.
Anyway, the point is that as long as there is financial incentive to create malware, there will be people doing it, regardless of the consequences, just like drug dealing. That the consequences come from different directions is immaterial.
If so, what does your reply have to do with that article? If you bother to read it, you will see that there is a section that extensively covers the development of the British Bombes(Turing, Welchman and Keen apparently deserve a great deal of credit).
So The Lord of the Rings is speculative fiction about what the word would be like if their were hobbits and wizards, like they thought might exist in 1950? Who knew.
It's not less and less true. Look at the software industry. It basically didn't exist a short 30 years ago. Or look at agriculture. Land in the US is more productive per acre today than ever before, and it takes less people to farm a given area of land that it ever has in the past. The examples go on and on.
Nah. It'll be ~8-10% higher against the Euro within a year or so (maybe two).
The European central bank needs to lower interest rates, if they don't, American companies will start demolishing European companies in world markets (well, if you accept "getting a lot more of the new business" as demolishing). That will drive the relative valuation in favor of the dollar. If they don't lower interest rates, European business will slow down, giving American business a little room to breath, helping the American export economy, which will strengthen the dollar.
If the entire US economy is a fantasy, then my interpretation is wrong, but I'm pretty sure that the majority of the US economy is not a fantasy.
It's quite likely that they go to some effort to attempt to disclose the terms of the viewing of the performance prior to you purchasing the ticket. It's also quite likely that you don't have a reasonable expectation of compensation if they advertise that they performance is being recorded. They may well need to refund your money if you object and they ask you to leave, but I'm pretty sure that it isn't exactly a legal nail-biter, despite the fact that I am not a lawyer and I have not looked into it.
Bugs matter depending on their severity, regardless of when they were introduced. My point (and, I believe, the OP) was more that a security problem can be introduced long before it is uncovered and thus end up in multiple versions of a given package, synchronized releases or not.
Most people who care to, especially the police, know who the drug dealers are. Anyone who has never met a drug dealer has led a more sheltered life than I have, and that is an accomplishment.
Anyway, the point is that as long as there is financial incentive to create malware, there will be people doing it, regardless of the consequences, just like drug dealing. That the consequences come from different directions is immaterial.
Scottish huh. Is that like Irish?
That's stupid.
Look how well playing wack-a-mole has worked for drug enforcement. Rather, look how it hasn't worked at all.
A massive number of people in the US just completely misunderstood what you said.
How many strange looks do you get on a typical day?
Just curious.
Yeah I noticed that when I was looking for Beerfest. I don't really check his reviews that often, I mostly just don't bother going to the theater.
That depends a great deal on whether they think they are in Japan or not.
Make that "whether". Stupid homophones.
Apparently other people are also interested in weather markets can predict things:
http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/
http://www.intrade.com/
http://www.google.com/search?q=political+markets
Notice at Google that major media outlets are running them now. UIowa was pretty early if they weren't the first.
If you are in Miami and someone asks you for directions to Tokyo, telling them they are lost is probably a good place to start.
I'm not saying that this is the case here...
I misread this statement: "Most of mythology fit the definition of #1 when it was written." to be about the mythology in fiction books.
Thanks though, for keeping the level of discourse low, by linking to a fallacy on Wikipedia.
Are you replying to this post:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=555186&cid=23432200
If so, what does your reply have to do with that article? If you bother to read it, you will see that there is a section that extensively covers the development of the British Bombes(Turing, Welchman and Keen apparently deserve a great deal of credit).
I'm pretty sure that it has been possible to use whatever GSM device on AT&T since it was Cingular.
They still sell phones that are locked to their network, but I don't think they have done much to prevent people from using unlocked phones.
Great article on the history of Enigma:
http://www.nsa.gov/publications/publi00016.cfm
Where in the article or anything related to the article is anybody speaking for the US?
So The Lord of the Rings is speculative fiction about what the word would be like if their were hobbits and wizards, like they thought might exist in 1950? Who knew.
He is already massively wealthy.
The linux version of the XO will continue to be available.
It's not less and less true. Look at the software industry. It basically didn't exist a short 30 years ago. Or look at agriculture. Land in the US is more productive per acre today than ever before, and it takes less people to farm a given area of land that it ever has in the past. The examples go on and on.
Nah. It'll be ~8-10% higher against the Euro within a year or so (maybe two).
The European central bank needs to lower interest rates, if they don't, American companies will start demolishing European companies in world markets (well, if you accept "getting a lot more of the new business" as demolishing). That will drive the relative valuation in favor of the dollar. If they don't lower interest rates, European business will slow down, giving American business a little room to breath, helping the American export economy, which will strengthen the dollar.
If the entire US economy is a fantasy, then my interpretation is wrong, but I'm pretty sure that the majority of the US economy is not a fantasy.
It's quite likely that they go to some effort to attempt to disclose the terms of the viewing of the performance prior to you purchasing the ticket. It's also quite likely that you don't have a reasonable expectation of compensation if they advertise that they performance is being recorded. They may well need to refund your money if you object and they ask you to leave, but I'm pretty sure that it isn't exactly a legal nail-biter, despite the fact that I am not a lawyer and I have not looked into it.
Why not just wipe your ass with the money you payed for the license?
They are going to continue to offer a model that doesn't come with Windows.
I guess it's a big change in direction, but they have only added Windows as an option at this point, not abandoned the original software completely.
Bugs matter depending on their severity, regardless of when they were introduced. My point (and, I believe, the OP) was more that a security problem can be introduced long before it is uncovered and thus end up in multiple versions of a given package, synchronized releases or not.
That's all still part of the user interface, just not the graphical part of it.