And Obama new rules just call for 3.1 gallons max no matter what. A sensible rule would be some sort of efficiency as in so much material removed per gallon. This restricts the machine from using more than that amount of water even though it knows the dishes are still dirty.
The new rules are not yet in effect that call for a max of 3.1 gallons per load. Were not yet seeing machines that meet this standard outside of testing models.
I'll give you a hit we have fully computer controlled manual gearboxes for a long time now. Running a clutch and changing gears it not that hard of a problem. You get all the efficiency of a stick shift with none on of the annoyance factor.
When a feel good regulation means you end up using more resources that helps how? It's great that it used 50% less water till you have to run it twice to actually get it clean.
Sure in a sane world it would use a reliable sensor that determines when it's clean coupled with other things like higher pressure or other things to be more effective while maintaining reliability.
Lots of fiber in the ground tends to be useful, it's not a little bit of bandwidth it's a whole lot. What happens when school systems have a very fast interconnect that is also low latency and reliable? Maybe the consolidate things at the main office or the high school. Tech like VDI separates the display/input from the computing and storage. Bandwidth or more exactly the lack of/cost/reliability/latency keeps a lot of systems in house, lots of fiber gets rid of those issues now a business with a local footprint can step in and replace a school backend IT dept. Same goes for other businesses.
If it were only required for drones that used a public resource. AKA flying into navigable airspace or in public spaces. I do not need a licence plate for a vehicle that never see's the public roads like a beater plow truck.
Proper municipal fiber can give you more competition. Unlike copper you can nearly trivially have multiple ISP's on a single strand via cheap CWDM. So Muni fiber can be primarily be a last mile network with ISP's only needing to connect at the CO. Since this drastically lowers the cost to enter a market a single fiber plant can support a nearly unlimited number of ISP's. If the Muni also puts in a L2 network it can get even cheaper to get entry. IPv6 routing makes it very easy to support multiple ISP's maybe a town one without internet access that gets people to the school's library town hall etc. Layer VoIP on top of this and you quickly can move local calls to the muni network and build a 911 system on top. Suddenly you have a working video calling system.
It could make sense for highly viewed content. While the entire library is that big the highly viewed content not so much. Can guestimate from the their appliance has 288 raw TB or so that should be enough to fit all the high demand content.
The registration is a bit of a farce under 83 (82?) feet on your own property since the courts have decised that is definitely yours. Make no mistake this is a power grab from the FAA to regulate the sub 500ft airspace across the board.
Sensible registration would be a requirement to fly outside of space you own and/or with the ability to infringe significantly on others rights.
Back in the MPEG2 Sat days they regularly used different bit rates depending on content talking heads very little compared to full out for sports and action movies. An actual knowledgeable encoding tech can do wonders, higher quality source material can also do wonders.
It's required to invade another's privacy a normal drone might be annoying to neighbors but should be perfectly legal same as playing bad music. Throw a camera on it and now it's looking over their fence or treeline is a problem. So a camera less drone can at worst trespass as far as neighbors are concerned but realy no different than a ball going astray and landing in their yard with similar repercussions at best a hey sorry at worst they keep it or it breaks a window etc. Frankly most home drones do not have the umph to reach that 400 foot mark to be a hazard to aircraft.
They have no registration requirement for drones only used indoors, It's specific that they need to register before their first outdoor flight.
To be fair would say it would have been better if under a certain height on private property without a camera did not need to be registered for private use.
While I'm sure the government can easily spend millions how much money do you need to make a 2 page web site with a 3rd/4th page being some CC processors web site for payment? One static form with the required info and validation, off the the CC proc for CC and confirmation and back to a here is your cert stuff data into a DB.
That energy is not very portable as it stands. The US lacks the political will to build new clean cheap efficient reactors. We have multiple lobbies who's interests are served by raising the costs.
Consider that IPSec is the only commonly used open standard. Not anyconnect not they need a site to site for only a NAT IP on both ends. Cert based is pretty straight forward actually.
Mind you I do not realy thing this buys you much over SSL with a pined cert for both ends.
As stated move someplace with sensible setbacks like 150 feet and reasonable multi acre min building lots. The only neighbor sounds I can hear inside is recess/sports at the elementary school next door and that's only on the one side of the house. Personally I enjoy the sounds of recess. Were I not work from home that would only be sat mornings for part of the year.
To an actually nice neighborhood where the setbacks and minimum building lots are sufficient.
Anti Barking electronics work.
From the sounds of your area do you have a HOA to abuse and thus abuse him, those fun things like 3 people show up to elections so get 2 neighbors and vote yourself in.
Check the laws abuse him with those, if you can't abuse him while staying within the laws. I suggest ICP blasting as max legal decibels as early/late as possible. Put a sign on speakers that it's dog barking abatement. Another good one is enough security lights to make sure it's daylight coming through his windows sporadically 24/7 you obviously live far to close to your neighbors thus making thus effective.
Fake it get a lawyer to threaten to sue for the lose of use/value of your home, the cost of soundproofing etc etc. I am not saying it will stick just that many view the threat very seriously.
Do not use a gun were a nation of insane anti gun laws, often crossbows and other non firearms are just as effective and remember in many places an animal in your yard is fair game to kill check with a lawyer first obviously.
If you can get away with it kidnap the dog bring it to a distant no kill shelter after checking and removing any microchips. Probably a better life that living with these tools.
Realize that in everything but moving your going to have to deal with a pissed of neighbor for at least awhile. Suggest a good full coverage CCTV spread to capture any repercussions. I do firmly suggest moving to someplace that has reasonable zoning not these built on top of each other to make the developer happy places.
Slashdot Mirror
And Obama new rules just call for 3.1 gallons max no matter what. A sensible rule would be some sort of efficiency as in so much material removed per gallon. This restricts the machine from using more than that amount of water even though it knows the dishes are still dirty.
The new rules are not yet in effect that call for a max of 3.1 gallons per load. Were not yet seeing machines that meet this standard outside of testing models.
And this is a good thing your property should never choose something else over you.
I'll give you a hit we have fully computer controlled manual gearboxes for a long time now. Running a clutch and changing gears it not that hard of a problem. You get all the efficiency of a stick shift with none on of the annoyance factor.
When a feel good regulation means you end up using more resources that helps how? It's great that it used 50% less water till you have to run it twice to actually get it clean.
Sure in a sane world it would use a reliable sensor that determines when it's clean coupled with other things like higher pressure or other things to be more effective while maintaining reliability.
An insulin pump should need an inspection for explosive compounds so it's a pat down + extra no matter what.
Lots of fiber in the ground tends to be useful, it's not a little bit of bandwidth it's a whole lot. What happens when school systems have a very fast interconnect that is also low latency and reliable? Maybe the consolidate things at the main office or the high school. Tech like VDI separates the display/input from the computing and storage. Bandwidth or more exactly the lack of/cost/reliability/latency keeps a lot of systems in house, lots of fiber gets rid of those issues now a business with a local footprint can step in and replace a school backend IT dept. Same goes for other businesses.
If it were only required for drones that used a public resource. AKA flying into navigable airspace or in public spaces. I do not need a licence plate for a vehicle that never see's the public roads like a beater plow truck.
Proper municipal fiber can give you more competition. Unlike copper you can nearly trivially have multiple ISP's on a single strand via cheap CWDM. So Muni fiber can be primarily be a last mile network with ISP's only needing to connect at the CO. Since this drastically lowers the cost to enter a market a single fiber plant can support a nearly unlimited number of ISP's. If the Muni also puts in a L2 network it can get even cheaper to get entry. IPv6 routing makes it very easy to support multiple ISP's maybe a town one without internet access that gets people to the school's library town hall etc. Layer VoIP on top of this and you quickly can move local calls to the muni network and build a 911 system on top. Suddenly you have a working video calling system.
It could make sense for highly viewed content. While the entire library is that big the highly viewed content not so much. Can guestimate from the their appliance has 288 raw TB or so that should be enough to fit all the high demand content.
The registration is a bit of a farce under 83 (82?) feet on your own property since the courts have decised that is definitely yours. Make no mistake this is a power grab from the FAA to regulate the sub 500ft airspace across the board.
Sensible registration would be a requirement to fly outside of space you own and/or with the ability to infringe significantly on others rights.
Back in the MPEG2 Sat days they regularly used different bit rates depending on content talking heads very little compared to full out for sports and action movies. An actual knowledgeable encoding tech can do wonders, higher quality source material can also do wonders.
It's required to invade another's privacy a normal drone might be annoying to neighbors but should be perfectly legal same as playing bad music. Throw a camera on it and now it's looking over their fence or treeline is a problem. So a camera less drone can at worst trespass as far as neighbors are concerned but realy no different than a ball going astray and landing in their yard with similar repercussions at best a hey sorry at worst they keep it or it breaks a window etc. Frankly most home drones do not have the umph to reach that 400 foot mark to be a hazard to aircraft.
Never had that issue every drone like thing I've owned in a decade powers down slowly if looses control signal.
Somebody will get the bright idea that it's a tax so it applies.
They have no registration requirement for drones only used indoors, It's specific that they need to register before their first outdoor flight.
To be fair would say it would have been better if under a certain height on private property without a camera did not need to be registered for private use.
While I'm sure the government can easily spend millions how much money do you need to make a 2 page web site with a 3rd/4th page being some CC processors web site for payment? One static form with the required info and validation, off the the CC proc for CC and confirmation and back to a here is your cert stuff data into a DB.
The 5 bucks you gave them on a CC?
That energy is not very portable as it stands. The US lacks the political will to build new clean cheap efficient reactors. We have multiple lobbies who's interests are served by raising the costs.
Getting from A-B as fast as possible while keeping the driver safe is the purpose of cars.
Thus why I said SSL with pined certs and went for IPSec site to site also with certs since that is a standard and goes between vendors every day.
Consider that IPSec is the only commonly used open standard. Not anyconnect not they need a site to site for only a NAT IP on both ends. Cert based is pretty straight forward actually.
Mind you I do not realy thing this buys you much over SSL with a pined cert for both ends.
Not at all, VPN does not mean NAT traversal, IPSec is perfectly capable of security on public IP to another hell that was a design goal.
As stated move someplace with sensible setbacks like 150 feet and reasonable multi acre min building lots. The only neighbor sounds I can hear inside is recess/sports at the elementary school next door and that's only on the one side of the house. Personally I enjoy the sounds of recess. Were I not work from home that would only be sat mornings for part of the year.
To an actually nice neighborhood where the setbacks and minimum building lots are sufficient.
Anti Barking electronics work.
From the sounds of your area do you have a HOA to abuse and thus abuse him, those fun things like 3 people show up to elections so get 2 neighbors and vote yourself in.
Check the laws abuse him with those, if you can't abuse him while staying within the laws. I suggest ICP blasting as max legal decibels as early/late as possible. Put a sign on speakers that it's dog barking abatement. Another good one is enough security lights to make sure it's daylight coming through his windows sporadically 24/7 you obviously live far to close to your neighbors thus making thus effective.
Fake it get a lawyer to threaten to sue for the lose of use/value of your home, the cost of soundproofing etc etc. I am not saying it will stick just that many view the threat very seriously.
Do not use a gun were a nation of insane anti gun laws, often crossbows and other non firearms are just as effective and remember in many places an animal in your yard is fair game to kill check with a lawyer first obviously.
If you can get away with it kidnap the dog bring it to a distant no kill shelter after checking and removing any microchips. Probably a better life that living with these tools.
Realize that in everything but moving your going to have to deal with a pissed of neighbor for at least awhile. Suggest a good full coverage CCTV spread to capture any repercussions. I do firmly suggest moving to someplace that has reasonable zoning not these built on top of each other to make the developer happy places.