Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Any Dishwasher Hackers Out There?

New submitter writes: I just replaced my dishwasher with a basic, inexpensive Sears model. It works fine, but only has 3 different wash cycles. I'm betting that the code to manage more cycles (as in more-expensive models) is already in the microcontroller and just needs inputs to select it. Is there any information available on this? Beyond dishwashers, have you done any useful hacks to household appliances more generally? I'd probably support a Kickstarter project that adds nice wireless notifications to my oven, clothes washer, and dishwasher.

481 comments

  1. Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Different firmware is loaded into each controller. Not to mention the cheaper models probably won't have the hardware to run the omitted cycles properly.

    1. Re:Won't work by ickleberry · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thats what the ominous 'they' want you to think but corporate megacorps have been known to intentionally cripple hardware in the past. All I want to say to our would-be dishwasher hacker is try not to draw the attention of the dishwasher manufacturers, or before you know it they'll be finding a way to put DRM on dishwashers.

    2. Re:Won't work by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Informative

      Often the same firmware is already loaded, and it chooses which feature package by what is plugged in. This if often true where there was a more expensive model of the same brand. I've dealt with that many times by simply unplugging the sensors for a broken part. Then it will work with reduced features until repair is possible. (eg, parts arrive)

      Not having the hardware is really the problem. Those extra cycles usually rely on having separate pumps and things on different parts. So each extra cycle probably has a daughter board that is handling the motor controls.

      The good DIY solution is to replace the whole firmware with something open, and start separating and layering the logic so that you can share high-level feature programming between different hardware. Then you can have a common firmware that provides features, and device-specific daughter boards for hardware integration.

    3. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. So cite us some examples of hardware that has been uncrippled EXCLUSIVELY through a software update.

    4. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ok. So cite us some examples of hardware that has been uncrippled EXCLUSIVELY through a software update.

      There's an oscilloscope manufacturer that ships an upgrade from 1 GB to 2 GB memory through email by sending a code.

    5. Re:Won't work by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Informative

      back porting xbox 360 games to xbone?

      Uh, no. They built a software emulator, the hardware is extremely different and there is not a hidden 360 CPU in the XBone.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    6. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some hp printers used to have the same software load on board across multiple models, and it was the included, model-specific user-affixed top panel, read by the printer, that actually defined the exact printer model... if hp could go cheap and make one-size-fits-all for a particular line, so could sears.

    7. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already do this.
      Please try to keep up.

    8. Re:Won't work by ArchieBunker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Rigol oscilloscopes. One minor software change and now your 50Mhz scope now magically works at 100Mhz.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    9. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this guy who hooked a JATO engine to a car and used it to run drugs at night using night vision goggles and a cop's radar gun would go off the charts but he didn't know why because the guy drove without headlights and his car was going at 900 mph until the wheels burned off and nothing was left!

    10. Re:Won't work by AaronW · · Score: 1

      Tesla supercharging support for the P65/P70 models. There are many more. I see this a lot with high-end test equipment, for example. Although they often can't be upgraded later, the CPUs I work with are often intentionally crippled by blowing fuses to disable features for lower cost versions. When they're manufactured they have all the features and cores, only to have some disabled later.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    11. Re:Won't work by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Flashing GPUs with a higher end firmware. Unlocking cores in AMD CPUs......jailbreaking often unlocks hardware that is dormant, like bluetooth on Apple TV gen2 and Nook color tablets. These are just things I have done personally....

      --
      Good-bye
    12. Re:Won't work by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      An Alcatel ADSL modem from circa 2001 that becomes a router/modem when flashed to the "pro" version.

    13. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it magically work a 100MHz or does it just appear to do it?
      Pretty much every oscilloscope manufacturer have the same scope with different frequencies. Just because you can upgrade the software for the digital part in all of them to grab samples at 100MHz or 200MHz it doesn't mean that the analog part is able to let those frequencies through undistorted.

    14. Re:Won't work by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Or, they tested the higher end features, found out that the hardware didn't support it well and binned that particular device. Happens to chips, happens to boxes.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    15. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this guy who hooked a JATO engine to a car and used it to run drugs at night using night vision goggles and a cop's radar gun would go off the charts but he didn't know why because the guy drove without headlights and his car was going at 900 mph until the wheels burned off and nothing was left!

      The only JATO tests i'm aware of the car only went 140mph, easily achieved under normal engine power. The JATO just produces a lot more force and would be capable of getting the vehicle up to that speed very fast. But hey if you don't believe me trust the physics http://www.ellipsix.net/blog/2... and lets let this nonsense die.

    16. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscope.

      You have to be living in a bubble if you don't understand that hardware is intentionally crippled by firmware to create artificial product distinctions.

      And in case your bubble is so thick and opaque that reality has a hard time getting in:

      http://gotroot.ca/rigol/riglol...

      That's how you do it. That's how I did it. And yes, you can increase the sample memory the same way. Hardware is so cheap that it's not worth keeping two builds going, you build one version of the board and create "products" in software. I think this is immoral.

    17. Re:Won't work by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 5, Informative

      Check out a documentary called "The Lightbulb Conspiracy" on planned obsolescence. They find a Canon or Epson printer with a chip inside that counts the number of prints made, and after some arbitrary number will throw an unrecoverable error essentially telling you it's time to buy a new printer. By the end of the movie, they've reset the chip without any hardware modifications and the printer continues printing just fine.

    18. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DSL modems that could flash upgrade to router.

      Nvidia gamer video cards could be made to be quattro.

    19. Re:Won't work by sexconker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ok. So cite us some examples of hardware that has been uncrippled EXCLUSIVELY through a software update.

      PS4 and XBONE have yielded more memory and CPU to developers to use for games through software updates.
      People routinely by 2nd tier CPUs and GPUs and flash the firmware in the hopes of unlocking extra cores or compute units that were disabled during binning.
      People used to unlock "locked" CPUs for overclocking with a modified BIOS.

    20. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      DVD player. It used to only be able to play Region 2 discs, but by entering a short code into the remote it's become Region Free (or any region me - or obviously the manufacturer - wish to lock it to)

    21. Re:Won't work by TWX · · Score: 1

      Ok. So cite us some examples of hardware that has been uncrippled EXCLUSIVELY through a software update.

      Cisco now integrates all features into their IOS 15 devices that the devices are capable-of, and uses licensing to unlock those features. Same holds true for their ASAs and their WLAN controllers.

      One could even argue in the past, being able to go from IP Base to IP services or Enterprise Services by loading a different IOS is the same thing. The hardware capabilities are there, but the software wasn't unless it was installed.

      I would not expect an appliance manufacturer to do the same thing though. There are lots of mechanical devices that could be omitted from inexpensive models even if they use the same PCB with most of the same components soldered on, and they might well omit all of the extra PCB components if it's just a matter of choosing the right template in the PCB fab for a given model.

      It would be much more likely that replacement PCB might have more capabilities though, if they only want to stock one replacement part for all lines with the same form factor of PCB.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    22. Re:Won't work by c4757p · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, their name is Every Oscilloscope Maker Ever.

    23. Re:Won't work by GNious · · Score: 2

      Some of this is due to pre-allocated resources.
      CPU reserved to support mandatory Kinect features -> features become optional, resources released
      CPU reserved for planned OS features -> Features require less CPU, resources released
      RAM reserved for planned OS features -> Features implemented with smaller footprint, resources released

    24. Re:Won't work by slacktide · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pretty much every single modern jet engine installed on current build airliners works this way. The hardware is the same, but the thrust limit is controlled by either the software version loaded in the EEC, or an "identification plug" which plugs into the EEC and acts as a switch to tell it which software limits to use. For example, the CFM56-7B which powers current production Boeing 737NGs is available in thrust ranging from 19,500 lbs to 27,300 lbs. The hardware is the same. The ID plug and the price is what makes them different. Pictures of the rating plug and how it works on a 737 here: http://nandang-smart.blogspot.... http://www.sjap.nl/cfm56-7-hyb...

    25. Re:Won't work by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Any camera that supports Magic Lantern firmware. While not an official upgrade path, there are many features available in more expensive cameras that were unlocked via the Magic Lantern firmware.....so the device itself is capable even if the manufacturer doesn't enable it.

      Same can be said of routers supporting DD-WRT et al. The hardware supports the features but the provided firmware doesn't enable it.

    26. Re:Won't work by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Flashing GPUs with a higher end firmware. Unlocking cores in AMD CPUs

      These are both pretty bad examples, because those cores are usually disabled because they don't pass all of the tests. With small feature sizes, yields of complex ICs are pretty low. It's common for CPUs and GPUs to be designed with various optional features. If there's a manufacturing defect in one part, then that part is disabled and you can still use the rest. The Cell was a particularly good example of this: very few had 8 working SPUs and so the ones in the PS3 all had 7 SPUs enabled and the ones that managed to pass tests with all 8 SPUs were sold in blades.

      Sometimes you're fortunate and the yields are higher than expected, so some chips get put in a cheaper bin in spite of testing well enough to be sold in a more expensive bin.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    27. Re:Won't work by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      This is very common in the enterprise market. Fibre Channel switches are shipped with, say, 24 hardware ports and only 12 active. You pay more cash and they unlock the extra ports for you, so you don't need to replace the hardware. IBM have shipped SAN disk storage systems with X+more capacity and only X unlocked. When the customer needs more space, they give IBM more of their hard-earned and IBM unlock the extra capacity that is already on premises.

    28. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a special kinda dumb

    29. Re:Won't work by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      Yes, and the makers of Scantron machines, not that I used to service them or anything. *cough*

      Also, copiers: Ricoh, Xerox, Canon, Imagistics (Pitney Bowes), Kyocera, etc etc etc. Every single copier maker cripples their low-end copiers by locking out embedded functions. The fuller-featured models are often mechanically identical, just deliberately lobotomized.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    30. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla

    31. Re:Won't work by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      I hope the 23,846 examples below are sufficient.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    32. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of engines it makes sense because they are leased, and the lease cost includes maintenance.
      Also, using the full power may damage the aircraft which was designed for a certain power level. Some extra power above 100% rating is available to pilots in an emergency; but using this probably invalidates the warranty and the engine gets replaced before next takeoff.

    33. Re:Won't work by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Towards the beginning of a new model, the parts are often binned due to failing a test. As they work out the bugs in production, you become increasingly likely to find a perfectly good part that was disabled to meet supply requirements only.

    34. Re:Won't work by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 2

      JATO are for beginners. There are far better ways to go fast.

      http://jalopnik.com/5481005/vi...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    35. Re:Won't work by jrumney · · Score: 1

      This might be true for makers of small volume specialist equipment, but for consumer goods, margins are too low to include unused functionality which is disabled by software.

    36. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like most discrete graphics cards?

    37. Re:Won't work by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Isn't that more due to the fact that more and more cameras and routers are shipped with a general purpose CPU that could provide those features?

      If a device - whatever device it may be - has a CPU capapble of running some kind of linux, a ethernat port and a usb port, you don't need to "unlock" anything to turn that thing into a NAS. No matter if has been designed and sold as a router, tv or coffee maker.

      --
      bickerdyke
    38. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOOOSHHH!!!!

    39. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a digital oscope that was software crippled. You could connect a serial term and update with a new model number. Poof, more resolution instantly.

    40. Re:Won't work by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      The Archos 5 has a radio which is disabled unless you send them some extra money.

    41. Re:Won't work by ogopogo · · Score: 1

      Intel had the "Intel Upgrade Service" for the Pentium G6951 CPU's. For a $50 fee, Intel would email you an activation code so your CPU could have one additional megabyte of cache enabled, as well hyper-threading, making it almost like the Core i3-530. ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    42. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An idiotic premise posted by someone who is either young, or has no experience with appliances, or both. Millenial twat.

    43. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea except reliable stable 100mhz operation is not guaranteed. It's a yield game. Lots of inferior Rigol units are sold as 50mhz because they weren't able to perform at 100mhz...

    44. Re:Won't work by BradMajors · · Score: 2

      Some old mainframe computers I used to worked on. The different models (speeds) were determined by a firmware constant. If you knew enough, through a hack, you could upgrade your mainframe to a higher model by changing a constant.

    45. Re:Won't work by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      You can upgrade my car by changing a firmware chip to the "Turbo" model with higher performance.

    46. Re:Won't work by Alien7 · · Score: 1

      Flexfuel vehicles, the difference between running efficiently on ethanol and not is just a software hack

    47. Re:Won't work by quenda · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily. Years ago I hacked a Fisher & Paykel washing machine in this way.
      It shared the same control-panel PCB as more expensive models.
      I just had to solder extra switches and LEDs to the PCB. I think it even had the silk-screening to tell me what they did.
      No firmware change needed, I now had extra settings like delayed start and more cycles.

    48. Re:Won't work by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      The only difference between a ford focus and an e-85 focus is software (and badging).

      So that's the example you are asking for.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    49. Re:Won't work by freedom_surfer · · Score: 1

      Some IBM mainframes had 'memory upgrades' that could be turned on after initial purchase.

      From a zSeries manual
      "Memory upgrades are satisfied from already-installed unused memory capacity until exhausted. When no more unused memory is available from the installed memory cards, either the cards must be upgraded to a higher capacity or the additional of a processor drawer with additional memory is necessary."

    50. Re:Won't work by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Play dvds on a Wii.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    51. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orinoco Silver Wireless Cards.

      Back in the day of 802.11b, Orinoco Gold included 128-bit WEP and the Silver only 56-bit. You had to change some flash ids in the Silver to enable 128-bit WEP.

    52. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tip, I just watched the documentary and its really good.

      This information should be divulged, especially in light of all the recent environmental efforts.

    53. Re:Won't work by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      It can cut both ways. Binning serves lots of purposes, some technical, some economic. Its an elastic process. Sometimes they just need the 'cheaper model' to have less performance so it stays in its market segment.

      --
      Good-bye
    54. Re:Won't work by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      If you're buying cheap chinese test equipment you know the risks involved.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    55. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /thread

    56. Re:Won't work by carlos92 · · Score: 1

      Siemens A56 vs Siemens C56

    57. Re:Won't work by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The only way to tell I'd to look really. There might be some resistors fitted or not fitted to tell the CPU what model it is. The OP needs to take it apart and investigate.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    58. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite a few videocards back in the days could be converted from Geforce to Quadro by firmware alone. The same goes for radeon to firegl

    59. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a citation for this?

    60. Re:Won't work by alantus · · Score: 2

      Sorry we didn't meet your expectations, but the public notaries are closed on weekends.

    61. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things like that are not intentionally crippled. Amd for instance sells its 4 core processor as a 3 core incase 1 core is not functional. Same reason the PS3 had 7 cores and not 8.

    62. Re:Won't work by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      I think IBM does it on their mainframes. Hardware is already there, but only activated after you pay for the proper licensing depending on the amount of computing power you need.

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    63. Re:Won't work by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      Shhhhh.......grown-ups are talking. Get back down to your basement...

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    64. Re:Won't work by Mantrid42 · · Score: 2

      Couple years back I had a friend with a cellphone from Sprint, I think it was. Anyway, though he had a data plan, apparently they wanted him to pay extra for GPS. Let that one sink in.

    65. Re:Won't work by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      This might be true for makers of small volume specialist equipment, but for consumer goods, margins are too low to include unused functionality which is disabled by software.

      Tell that to the folks at CHDK.

    66. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People used to unlock "locked" CPUs for overclocking with a modified BIOS.

      Screw you copper, my BIOS was like that when I found it!

      Side note: 5 years at 5GHZ and I'm still faster than the best the market can offer.

    67. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many companies that make radio transceivers are like this too.

      Cant enable features of the radio especially digital modes and encryption without special codes or even program the damn thing. They wonder why people hack the software and even the firmware to remove the serial number their special authorization codes rely on.

    68. Re:Won't work by BLKMGK · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://hackaday.com/2010/03/31...

      http://hackaday.com/2013/03/14...

      http://hackaday.com/2013/03/18...

      http://www.extremetech.com/com...

      https://www.avforums.com/threa...

      Most any WiFi firmware artificially limits the radio -> http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/proj...

      http://www.ilounge.com/index.p...

      Whoa, your car has hidden features? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Extra cores on your CPU? No way! http://www.bit-tech.net/hardwa...

      Cripple phone features? Oh noes! https://www.techdirt.com/artic... https://www.techdirt.com/artic...

      More than one HAM radio have been found to be subject to software tweaking for improvements in scan speed and frequencies covered.-> https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Got a RAID card? Some of them can be crossflashed to gain features BTW. Or you can pay thousands to the manufacturer for some features (*cough*PERC*cough*) http://www.servethehome.com/ib...

      Gains can be had by flashing custom firmware to your DVD\BD RW drives but I didn't feel like spending any time past a cursory search to find this. http://binflash.cdfreaks.com/ http://www.rpc1.org/viewtopic.... http://dvrflash.rpc1.org/

      Firmware being used in external HDD has also been found to be crippled vs a standard drive, this didn't used to always be the case....

      Here's one that's just an upgrade with features the manufacturer didn't include (see also ANY Jailbreaking post ever)

      http://lifehacker.com/find-out...
      http://lifehacker.com/5942229/...
      http://www.digitaltrends.com/p...

      Oh look, your camera now supports RAW? Thought that was only for pro cameras not P&S pocket models...

      I could go on and on with examples but suffice it to say yeah it DOES happen and it happens fairly often. It happens most often with system that have a full OS, often Linux, where a firmware flash can give you all sorts of features (OpenWRT or Tomato anyone?) but it also happens in cameras, lab bench tools, TVs, stereos, and just about anything else that is driven by software. Want more turbo boost in your car? Software baby! Want that printer to register an empty toner cartridge sooner? No problem!

      Tired now, think I've made my point?

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    69. Re:Won't work by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Not always true although higher clockspeeds could be an exception. Lookup the fiasco with the Quadro cards. Lookup Apple specc'd cards that were sold for more money with the only difference being an identifier in the flash. HAM radios that have had features crippled. Scanners. DVD drives. I posted a list above but there's lots of examples and those were just the ones I knew about generally lol.

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    70. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's turtles all the way down.

      The chips the manufacturers use, such as DSPs and SoCs, are often crippled in the same way, and can be unlocked by using a specific license code. Lately some stuff comes with DRM chips you must talk to in order to get (presumably) encrypted commands.

      Make it a fucking controller and save me some work you retards.

    71. Re:Won't work by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Aw man, I knew about the P&S firmware chdk but not MagicLantern! Naturally I have an old Rebel XTi that isn't covered and runs VXworks but there's firmware for that too! Dammit, now I want to upgrade to a newer model and play. Curse you! lol -)

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    72. Re:Won't work by BLKMGK · · Score: 2

      Oh and a little thing called a flexfuel sensor. The link below is to an OEM part, I'm about to install a fuel system on my car that uses one of them. I'm not sure I'd call it a hack since the software to function on a WIDE range of alcohol levels is pretty decently different and must accept input from that sensor. Seems that "e85" often isn't and in Winter has more gasoline in it to promote cold start. You may also find out your piddly little gasoline injectors can't handle the flow for ethanol use and that many injectors fail when exposed to e85 unless specifically designed for it and most OEM injectors are NOT although they finally seem to have the fuel lines and tanks done right. Sorry but on this one you're talking out of your ass if you think it's just a software flip.

      http://www.summitracing.com/pa...

      P.S. Any vehicle that can run on both alcohol AND gasoline isn't running on alcohol "efficiently". Generally you want a ton more compression or a good bit more boost if it happens to be turbocharged. Alcohol makes a great race fuel but it's got much less bang per mole.

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    73. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia phones up until the smartphone era were pretty much a story of one product with 20 software defined variants.

    74. Re:Won't work by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      that's the usual excuse.

      the more often than not reason is that there is market for the cheaper chip but there's no reason to produce and design the cheaper chip without the extra parts, fit it on the die optimally and all that.

      so just produce the top end sell them as whatever people are willing to pay for.

      the dishwasher though.. hah good luck with that. aren't the 3 modes enough? if you want it hotter you could just hack the thermostat..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    75. Re:Won't work by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This is common practice as it increases economies of scale and reduces the total unit cost of equipment.
      But you want an example? Look down. Remember CPU overclocking? How about CAD applications that wouldn't recognised your graphics card unless you shoehorn that Quattro driver onto your PC? Or just look at some test equipment? Over at hackaday there's an almost monthly article of someone who's figured out that the hardware between two models of products were identical and you could load the firmware of one onto the other, or even better just make the existing firmware think it was set for a different product and all of a sudden your oscilloscope can measure an additional 100MHz above the advertised limit.

    76. Re:Won't work by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      margins are too low

      This is precisely why economies of scale are so important. There are plenty of examples of cars, cameras, your own graphics card where the functionality of the device is software limited.

      Design once and limit by software is a way of actively improving margins by minimising the front end loading of any project.

    77. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens is that they have a few options.

      - Make one PCB per model. (quite expensive)
      - Produce a single PCB populating only what's needed. (less expensive but will add const for maintaining different parts in stock for service etc)
      - Produce a single PCB and populate everything..

      With a PCB per model they will have to develop the software per PCB and each PCB will cost quite a bit..
      With a single PCB with all components populated they will have cheaper replacement-parts and they will lower the cost of making the software..
      With a single PCB with some components populated they will have different versions increasing the cost per PCB and possibly having a generic software.

      In many cases it will be cheaper to produce a single PCB with all components populated than the other variants.. And dishwashers / washing-machines usually do not require that much more for a few more program..
      A few programs i can think of that would not require any more parts:
      Dishwashers:
      - Quick-wash.. Just run each cycle for a shorter time..
      - Eco friendly program. (longer cycles and re-heating the water during cycles)
      Washing-machines:
      - Allergy program.. Extra cold/warm/cold rinse + possibly filling up with a bit more water.
      - Quick program.. 2 cycle program.. Wash + rinse with shorter cycles.

    78. Re:Won't work by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not true for GPUs. Or at least it may be true if you're thinking of overclocking, but my first through when the GP wrote his comment was Quattro cards. They were hardware identical to Geforce cards and yet somehow $1000 more expensive.

      I remember various tricks for getting my cards to work with Autocad and Maya. One required desoldering a resistor on one part of the board and soldering it on another. Another required flashing the firmware on the card. In each case my card's value increased by a factor of 5 and magically everything worked. It was a perfect example of limited by software.

    79. Re:Won't work by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Volkswagen diesel engines.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    80. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My computer. At one point in the past I switched from Windows to Linux, now it's faster and more stable than ever. True story

    81. Re:Won't work by Rob+Lister · · Score: 5, Informative

      That 'unrecoverable' error is telling you the waste ink system is saturated. Sure, you can reset the error if you know the trick. About a hundred or so power cycles later you'll discover that ink is leaking out of your printer and onto your [once] nice desk. They didn't do this to dick you, it is an engineering compromise. They could build in a replaceable waste ink system (as they do in higher end printers) but doing so would put the printer beyond the price point.

      Printer companies want you to keep your printer as long as possible. They are not in the printer selling business; they sell their printers at cost or at a loss. They are in the ink selling business. Which printer you buy it for really makes no difference to them.

    82. Re:Won't work by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Didn't they do so with cores and co-processors? The hardware was there, but failed a test. So underclock slightly and enable the other cores in software, and you had more processing power. If you were lucky.

    83. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of IBM' S/* to XSeries

    84. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that to some Canon's bubble jets.
      It is enraging.

    85. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flir E4 thermal camera. Shipped with 80x60 resolution and a firmware hack to 320x240 is easy. I did it on mine.

    86. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The canon D300 camera. Could do most of what the top molde did just with a firmware upgrade.

    87. Re: Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IPhones, some types of androids

    88. Re:Won't work by jrrnetflix · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe so. But I once worked on some security access control equipment based on 8-bit Motorola MCUs. They all used the same firmware image, but there was a "feature PROM" installed that told the chip which optional features the customer had paid for. The control panel for my low-end dishwasher looks just like the higher-priced models, but with some of the buttons missing. I'd almost bet that there are pads on the PC board ready to accept switches to select the extra cycles. And it shouldn't take any extra hardware to implement something like a "Rinse Hold" cycle.

    89. Re:Won't work by jrrnetflix · · Score: 1

      There's a somewhat famous example of creating a whole product line out of one design here: http://steveblank.com/2009/04/... SuperMac once offered 9 different Mac graphics boards priced from $700 to $4,000. The only difference between them was hardware wait states added to slow down the cheaper models. It's a very entertaining read, from my old friend Steve Blank.

    90. Re:Won't work by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      With the added benefit of getting a lower band of insurance :-)

    91. Re: Won't work by doccus · · Score: 1

      DVD player. It used to only be able to play Region 2 discs, but by entering a short code into the remote it's become Region Free (or any region me - or obviously the manufacturer - wish to lock it to)

      That was a pretty common hack back in the day. There was stuff all over the net about it and firmware hacks available to DL. Somehow it's all disappeared. The websites all give 404s or are parked. I had all that stuff on my HD but a few crashes later it's nada.. :sigh:

    92. Re: Won't work by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Magic Lantern for Canon cameras

    93. Re:Won't work by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      With ADRUINO AND RASBERRY cpus, and an adapter card to detect a few sensors, you can do better than trying to hack a controller. The best controllers were the clockwork mechanical drum ones with mechanical cam actuated contacts. Cheap, easy to repair, and reliable.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    94. Re:Won't work by rew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course there is a waste ink part that needs emptying.
      So: "Waste ink receptacle full" is a reasonable error message. Designing it in such a way that it is (with some trouble) exchangeable should be quite possible without increasing cost.

      But "having" that counter, the incentive is for the manufacturer to take big margins on when to call it "full".

    95. Re:Won't work by Proteus · · Score: 1
      1. A ton of industrial printers work like this; "upgrades" are done by a technician coming out and updating firmware.
      2. The microphone on the Pebble Time series watches was disabled in software upon shipping and enabled via a software update later
      3. Intel did this in 2010 on some models of processor

      And there are a lot more. In some cases, this is reasonable -- it's cheaper to make one version of something and then remove features to make it affordable, especially if it's something you're leasing/licensing; or the software to adequately support a feature just isn't ready yet. In other cases, it's market segmentation gone amok.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    96. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, they tested the higher end features, found out that the hardware didn't support it well and binned that particular device. Happens to chips, happens to boxes.

      Binning is a combination of physical testing and commercial sales decisions. There have been many examples of physically capable CPUs etc being sold as lower versions just because the numbers they had allocated to the upper bins had been already achieved.

    97. Re:Won't work by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this post

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    98. Re:Won't work by AaronW · · Score: 1

      The yields are such that more often than not the binning doesn't produce nearly enough low-end chips so higher-end ones get their fuses blown to remove features.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    99. Re:Won't work by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Check out a documentary called "The Lightbulb Conspiracy" on planned obsolescence. They find a Canon or Epson printer with a chip inside that counts the number of prints made, and after some arbitrary number will throw an unrecoverable error essentially telling you it's time to buy a new printer. By the end of the movie, they've reset the chip without any hardware modifications and the printer continues printing just fine.

      one manufacturer includes something called "telomeres" within the device, and as it ages, the telomeres become fewer, until the device fails irreparably.
      Terrible design.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    100. Re:Won't work by gzuckier · · Score: 2

      That 'unrecoverable' error is telling you the waste ink system is saturated. Sure, you can reset the error if you know the trick. About a hundred or so power cycles later you'll discover that ink is leaking out of your printer and onto your [once] nice desk. They didn't do this to dick you, it is an engineering compromise. They could build in a replaceable waste ink system (as they do in higher end printers) but doing so would put the printer beyond the price point. Printer companies want you to keep your printer as long as possible. They are not in the printer selling business; they sell their printers at cost or at a loss. They are in the ink selling business. Which printer you buy it for really makes no difference to them.

      i bought a toyota because they had such a good reputation for reliability. well, i barely got 200 miles out of it before it stopped dead. they told me the tank of "gasoline" (?) was completely empty! apparently the engine had been consuming it and I need to keep refilling it, like you have to keep adding oil to an old junker that burns it! and they had the nerve to tell me that was normal!

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    101. Re:Won't work by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      It is this sort of nonsense, coupled with constant head clogs, that made me give up on inkjets entirely and move to color laser printers. The color quality approaches that of inkjet printing, the cost per page is a fraction of cost of inkjet printing, I can leave it sitting there for two months and then print something without taking out the heads and soaking them in alcohol overnight, and it isn't a ticking time bomb just waiting to fail after some arbitrary number of pages.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    102. Re:Won't work by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Oh look, your camera now supports RAW? Thought that was only for pro cameras not P&S pocket models...

      Of course, there's still the question of whether they actually have a fast enough SD card slot to write RAW files at a rate that won't cause you to swear constantly (not to mention the risk of a hardware watchdog rebooting the device if it writes for too long like my original Digital Rebel used to do sporadically when paired with a microdrive).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    103. Re:Won't work by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The key here is "failed a test". So the disabling of features in software in that case increases yeild, and therefore allows for increased profit margin - until the competitors start doing the same, when it turns into lower prices.

    104. Re:Won't work by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Like you say, it is an economy of scale. If your scale is low enough that you are outsourcing the manufacturing, then the balance tips towards software enabling features on the same design. If you are doing your own manufacturing, then the actual hardware BOM cost is more important.

    105. Re:Won't work by rew · · Score: 1

      My mom has a vacation home and is retired.... She lives in one place for a few months and then in the other for a few months. So when she asks me "I need a new printer, what do you recommend?" my recommendation is: "Whatever you buy DO NOT, I repeat, DO NOT buy an inkjet". Guess what happened next?

    106. Re:Won't work by nategasser · · Score: 1

      Yikes. I seriously hope the airline I'm flying with next week doesn't try to save a few dollars by overclocking their jet engines.

    107. Re:Won't work by Rob+Lister · · Score: 1

      But "having" that counter, the incentive is for the manufacturer to take big margins on when to call it "full".

      There are no big margins. If your printer dies, for whatever reason, then you have to buy another one. They are sold at cost or at a loss. There is no profit there. And since you might buy a competitor's printer because you're pissed off, the margin becomes negative. You say ...

      Designing it in such a way that it is (with some trouble) exchangeable should be quite possible without increasing cost.

      You can buy a waste ink system for just about any printer. It will take you about an hour to change and a big fucking mess. Or you can buy a new printer with new features at what it costs to buy replacement ink for the old printer.

    108. Re:Won't work by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Ok. So cite us some examples of hardware that has been uncrippled EXCLUSIVELY through a software update.

      Most cellphones. I had the original Motorola RAZR that did all sorts of wonderful things . . . in Europe. But not when connected to any American network. For example, you couldn't add MP3s to use as your own ringtones.

    109. Re:Won't work by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      There was a specific version of the Cell that used DDR2 and was more competent at double precision floating point.

    110. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. So cite us some examples of hardware that has been uncrippled EXCLUSIVELY through a software update.

      HP's PA-RISC HP-UX machines. I watched the technician plug in a laptop with a crypto dongle, dial a phone number, type in the secret, 15-minute-time-bombed code she got from the phone call, and MAGIC the backplane was a different, far more expensive model. All she did was flip a bit or two in the firmware, and I saw it with my own eyes.

      And, obviously, the old IBM and Amdahl mainframes, which I assume you already knew about.

    111. Re:Won't work by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      And later in the cycle when their yields don't match market demands?

      The typical answer has been to ship parts with functioning components disabled rather than lower the price of the fully functioning part.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    112. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be surprised if a dishwasher even had a full micro-controller in the cheapest / budget models. I would more likely suspect little more than a timer with a couple AND gates from physical cycle selection switches out to the 4 electrical parts: Pump (spray/drain - so on1/on2/off), heater (on/off), fill solenoid (on/off), and water level switch (input on/off).

    113. Re:Won't work by davester666 · · Score: 1

      The Amana my dad bought is sold as a '2-stage' furnace, except it was a little cheaper than their real 2-stage version, and it's beyond stupid [other than marketing I guess]. It does have a low and high output mode, but low-output mode only can be enabled so it goes for a fixed period of time, and then switches to high-power mode. The furnace actually costs more to manufacture, because they had to add switches and electronics for this stupid mode, versus the regular 2-stage one, which just would have 2 wires to hook up to a more-expensive thermostat that can manage a 2-stage one.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    114. Re:Won't work by kimvette · · Score: 1

      That analogy would be sensible if your Camry's fuel tank were:

      * Sealed/nonrefillable
      * It was revealed up front that the car only will go 200 miles with the included fuel
      * The car gave you a clear indication that the problem is you're out of fuel
      * If the fuel tank not only is sealed but cast as part of the engine block, making replacement impractical

      As it is known an ICE engine will require fuel to go beyond its single-fill range and is designed to be easily refillable your analogy is extremely flawed.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    115. Re:Won't work by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Some old mainframe computers I used to worked on. The different models (speeds) were determined by a firmware constant.

      The difference is that Mainframes either cost millions of dollars or tens of millions, so throwing in some extra disabled hardware didn't hurt you bottom line that much. Especially since upgrades we're common, and the cost of retro fitting hardware is relatively expensive
      Compare that with consumer goods, which cost tens of dollars to a few hundred, where margins are razor thin, and no-one ever upgrades, it makes no sense to give out premium components to everyone and control it only in software.

    116. Re:Won't work by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I hope the 23,846 examples below are sufficient.

      Nope, because all 23,846 examples refer to electronic-only devices which are the easiest to build in a soft-upgrade path. With mechanical devices, higher spec components actually cost more to make, and hence can't just be given out on budget models with the firmware disabled. It's the same reason you can't just get a firmware upgrade to turn your Honda Civic into a Bugatti Veyron.
      So sure the concept works in some areas (especially electronics), but that doesn't mean it works for everything.

    117. Re:Won't work by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Nope, because all 23,846 examples refer to electronic-only devices which are the easiest to build in a soft-upgrade path. With mechanical devices,

      Trust me, Scantron TSM (test score machines) have plenty of mechanical parts, more than you might think. So do some a lot of copiers, practically every brand made does this now. And in case you weren't aware, copiers have a shitload of mechanical parts. Oodles of them.

      Even some electron microscopes these days are coming with mildy-crippled firmware that an upgrade can unlock. Hell, way back in the 90s some x-ray spectrometers had control boxes that were crippled (hello, J.E.O.L., Hitachi, and Zeiss) and they could be magically upgraded by swapping a few chips. Ask me how I know.

      So yeah, it's not just consumer gadgets or electronic-only devices that do this.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    118. Re:Won't work by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Already... when I try to run unauthorized modes it breaks dishes...

    119. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rigol oscilloscopes. One minor software change and now your 50Mhz scope now magically works at 100Mhz.

      Actually there's a hardware hack too. There's a bandwidth limiter on the tail of the channel amplifier. Before anyone thought to issue the serial commands, I popped that circuit off and proved that the 50 MHz model actually was the same unit. Posted it on EEVBlog several years ago now.

    120. Re:Won't work by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

      This is IBM's philosophy with their mainframe architecture. You buy a box and tell them how much capacity you want. They give you the unlock code. You later decide you need faster hardware. They unlock more hardware with a key, but the hardware is already in the box. Mainframes are still sold.

    121. Re:Won't work by jrrnetflix · · Score: 1

      I think mechanical timers are (thankfully) pretty much a thing of the past, even in low-end models. Seems like practically every problem I ever had with an appliance was due to the timing motor dying. And microcontrollers surely are cheaper these days.

  2. Not needed by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you need more than three different cycles, you're doing it wrong. Try not leaving cruddy dishes accumulate for so long (or do them by hand in the first place).

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:Not needed by sunderland56 · · Score: 0

      Not sure why you need more than one cycle, named "Dirty". What other kinds of dishes would you wash??

      My dishwasher (GE Profile) does have a Cat5 cable hanging down underneath it. I haven't plugged it in to experiment with because hey, I've got better things to do with my life.

    2. Re:Not needed by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      or do them by hand in the first place

      Why would you do them by hand? You need to put in effort, stack them to dry, you waste far more water than a modern dishwater ever will and not to mention time.

    3. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a samsung front loading washing machine. I *know* it does tons more. It has at least 10 settings I can use. I use maybe 3 of them. Usually just 1.

      It does what it needs to. No scratches needed to be scratched as it were. So I leave it be.

    4. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dishes last far longer that way. The handles of my frying pans don't go white, my glasses don't go cloudy, my dishes don't go dull. It's quite simple to wash by hand.

    5. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So rub the dishes over your body before you put them in the dishwasher.

    6. Re:Not needed by 6Yankee · · Score: 3, Informative

      You could do it the Finnish way, where stacking them to dry is also putting them away.

    7. Re:Not needed by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      and you'd likely spend more on water than you would on replacing said dishes/glasses.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    8. Re:Not needed by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not sure why you need more than one cycle, named "Dirty". What other kinds of dishes would you wash??

      My OCD wife pre-washes the dishes before loading them into the dishwasher. So the dishwasher just needs to rinse the detergent off them. So, of course, she uses the "heavy duty" cycle to do that.

    9. Re: Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 10 years of using a dishwasher I have never had any of these things happen. Maybe you need better dishes.

    10. Re:Not needed by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't need another cycle. I need an NSA approved backdoor.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    11. Re:Not needed by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      If you need more than three different cycles, you're doing it wrong.

      Actually, there a few things that you can wrong, like overloading it . . . or having something hanging down that blocks the sprayer arms from rotating . . . or loading that certain things don't get sprayed.

      But in this case, I think the problem is obvious:

      just replaced my dishwasher with a basic, inexpensive Sears model

      It's a cheap model from Sears.

      You can increase the performance of your Porsche a bit, by hacking the firmware. But you can't hack the firmware, and turn your Fiat into a Porsche . . . the hardware just isn't there.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    12. Re:Not needed by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Ours does that as well. It has an entire row of bright blue LEDs. Extra this, extra that. Dirty, clean, warm dry, hot dry, compleat biological disintergration (I wish).

      I just wish I could program it to unload itself.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re:Not needed by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      That doesn't really mean what you seem to want it to mean. Pushing the immune system is not just dirty dishes. It's dirty dishes with your Microbiology 101 lab growing on it. So, to do it right, avoid doing the dishes. Avoid putting them away. Just toss them on the floor, let the dog do the heavy lifting and start over for breakfast. Unplug the dishwasher entirely.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    14. Re:Not needed by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Pass. If you live anywhere that isn't a frozen wasteland, you'll be growing mold and mildew all up in that bitch.

    15. Re:Not needed by threephaseboy · · Score: 1

      My "eco-friendly" dishwasher leaves food on dishes if I don't scrape them with a scrubber first. I strongly suspect the extra water used for this step more than offsets any water saved by the machine. It still requires less effort overall, compared with hand washing.

      --
      .
    16. Re:Not needed by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Mine has three settings that I use regularly:
      • The 'eco' setting, which takes longer but uses less power and water. This is the one I normally use.
      • The 'dishes' setting, which uses more power and water than 'eco', but washes faster.
      • The 'glasses' setting, which doesn't clean as well, but is better for washing more fragile glasses.

      A lot of people also use a rinse setting if they don't generate enough dirty dishes to run the machine more than once a week or so, to prevent mould from growing in the machine. Mine is a small countertop model, so I don't have this issue.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    17. Re: Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But gas or electricity for heating it is far from free.

    18. Re:Not needed by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Your username, it checks out.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    19. Re:Not needed by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I've got a dishwasher that has 6 major cycles and another half dozen modifiers that can be applied. I use one cycle. Auto. I bought it for the quiet operation but manufacturers don't seem to be interested in reducing noise until they've run out of cycles to add. :P

      Also, before starting the dishwasher, run the hot water at the sink until it comes out hot. And don't use the cheapest store brand detergent you can find.

    20. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My own personal invention consists of 2 dish washers. One is holding the clean, the other the dirty stuff. Once full, they swap purposes.

      Big kitchens have removable trays for the dish washers, those can be put into storage right after cleaning / drying by the machine.

    21. Re:Not needed by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      In fairness, they are open completely to the bottom, so not really a damp environment. A great solution over the Anerican "drying rack" misery. There are other Scandanavian design concepts that don't transfer as well due to climate, but that isn't one of them.

    22. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is often an air duct near the draining closet. In other words, the kitchen has to be designed to hold one. To be honest, even using a furniture sank dish washer is a risk without an installed protection. It's a destruction guarantee for the cheaper kitchen materials above the washer within few years.

    23. Re: Not needed by Izuzan · · Score: 1

      Free ? Really ? only time i see "free" water are houses with a Well. Anyone on town/city water have to pay for it. mine costs me $318 every quarter.

    24. Re:Not needed by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      If your dishwasher can't handle some dried on food then you've got a crap dishwasher. I live alone so it takes a while to get a full dishwasher and it has no problem handling dishes that have been left for almost a week. I don't rinse or pre-wash the dishes before putting them in the dishwasher and they always come out clean.

    25. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I think the dishwasher uses more water, but I could be wrong there. Maybe newer ones are better than I remember in this regard.
      However, I do know that dishwashers use the hottest water they can get, some have supplemental water heaters to increase the temperature of what is already the hottest water the home system can produce, so 100% of whatever water they do use is at maximum energy consumption, vs water that is a mixture of hot and cold so humans can use it when hand washing.

    26. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're supposed to pre-wash the dishes to prevent food scraps blocking the machine. One reason I think dishwashers are useless.

    27. Re: Not needed by gordguide · · Score: 1

      " ... mine costs me $318 every quarter. ..."

      Just got my water bill the other day.

      [Location: Western Canada, city of $300k]

      Water Service Charge $0.2893 per day
      30 days $8.68

      Residential Water
      $0.02924 per ft3 $2.14

      Total Water $11.02 [1 month]

      In $Canadian, so $US 8.29

    28. Re:Not needed by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If you're going to scrub them anyway, why not just let them soak in a sink of soapy hot water for an hour and then quickly wash them by hand and let them air dry? It's probably quicker than scrubbing, loading, unloading ... and certainly less energy intensive.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    29. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since she's a mail order bride have you considered returning her?

    30. Re:Not needed by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Unless it has a hard food disposer. Then, you can load up dishes that have literal chunks of food on them.

      IMHO, two non-negotiable features any dishwasher I buy has to have:

      * hard food disposer

      * heated dry. I don't give a fuck if unheated drying modes get the non-plastic dishes mostly dry. I want my goddamn dishes sterilized, baked, and bone-dry when they come out.

      #2 was the entire reason why I didn't buy a Samsung DW80J3020US last month. It's a damn shame, too... Samsung has nice dishwashers that just happen to be gimped by the omission of heated drying.

    31. Re:Not needed by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Unless it has a hard food disposer. Then, you can load up dishes that have literal chunks of food on them.

      Standard plumbing practice is to have the dishwasher outlet plumbed into the inlet of your in-sink garbage disposal. So, assuming the dishwasher pump can handle the debris, you're fine.

    32. Re:Not needed by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to pre-wash the dishes to prevent food scraps blocking the machine.

      No -- you're supposed to remove/scrape off any large pieces of food before putting dishes into the dishwasher. Doing that should prevent any clogging. No "pre-washing" is generally necessary, though many dishwashers will have trouble with certain gunky stuff (solidified eggs, peanut butter, etc.), and rinsing them may be helpful.

      One reason I think dishwashers are useless.

      Well, yeah, if you're doing an entire wash before even putting them in the dishwasher.

      My routine? I actually cook for myself, so almost every meal has a few large pots or pans or bowls that I don't want to put into the dishwasher, because they'll take up half of a shelf or something, and that seems ridiculously inefficient. Also, I have stuff I handwash only (good knives, pans, glassware, etc.).

      Anyhow, with that handwash stuff, I'll use the rinsewater collected in a small basin or sink from those dishes, and do a quick pass with any dishes that have major gunk before throwing them in the dishwasher. I don't waste any water pre-washing, since I had already collected that water from stuff that needed handwashing anyway. And since modern dishwashers use less water and energy than handwashing, there's an energy benefit as well as the less time wasted doing a full wash of the dishes.

      Obviously YMMV, but if you come up with a reasonable routine, dishwashers usually save significant time and energy.

    33. Re:Not needed by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to pre-wash the dishes to prevent food scraps blocking the machine. One reason I think dishwashers are useless.

      Ugh, actually, I've heard someone claim that you're supposed to leave some food on the plates because modern dishwashers/detergent can target them with enzymes, and if you wash the food off first they can't do their magic.

      I have to admit it's a cool idea, and gives me all of 2 seconds of pause while I wipe my plates down before tossing them in.

    34. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try not leaving cruddy dishes accumulate for so long (or do them by hand in the first place).

      Dishwashers, especially modern models that are much smarter and that have a whole suite of water-quality sensors in them, are designed to wash dirty dishes; the manufacturers themselves tell you not to even pre-rinse dishes. So far as hand-washing everything goes: that's a gigantic waste of time and water. I don't know about you but I have better things to do with my time than stand at the sink and wash and dry a place setting for 8, when I could load a dishwasher and let it run while I sleep.

    35. Re: Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you exclude the sewer fees they add on to that, which are higher than the actual water fees, or do they not charge you extra for sewer?

    36. Re:Not needed by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You're making it too complicated. I've run experiments that have determined there's no reason to rinse dishes or glasses after you've washed them - glasses dry on the dish rack without spotting because ALL the water quickly drains off. So, put them in sink, fill with hot water and dish soap, let soak for an hour, then quickly wash and stack in the drying rack.

      Uses a LOT less water than a dishwasher. A lot less noise, too. And air drying means it's much more energy efficient as well. It's also easier on the back, since there's no bending down to load and unload the dish washer.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    37. Re:Not needed by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      my cheap chunk of crap can hardly do that, I use it more as a dish sanitizer cause if I want clean dishes I have to wash them first

    38. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not why she does it. If your dishwasher isn't full, you don't run it. Which means the food sits on the plates, rotting which creates smell.

      On the other hand, if you prewash the food off of it, then you can park it for as long as you like. At that point, you're using the dishwasher as a sanitizer.

      But, this is a common misconception for those who don't usually do the dishes.

    39. Re:Not needed by threephaseboy · · Score: 1

      Scrubbing may be overstating how much is actually done, it's really just a quick action while loading. Maybe 10% of the dishes actually require more than a rinse.
      Come to think of it, on reading some of the other comments, it may have more to do with the type of detergent used than the water efficiency. It seems to have particular trouble with egg residue, but I just do a single pass with a sponge and then they come out just fine.

      --
      .
    40. Re:Not needed by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      No need let the kids pick up and eat the food they drop on the floor in fact make them do it they drop less in the long run

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    41. Re:Not needed by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Notice I didn't mentioned cleanliness in my list above? You want dirty? Go play with your kids outside. That'll do more for your immune system than a few dishes ever will.

    42. Re:Not needed by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Glasses going cloudy... dishes going dull... wtf man.

      What the hell are you guys washing with a bar of soap mixed with a slurry of sand? How is it that anonymous cowards have such problems with their dishwasher?

    43. Re:Not needed by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh god, no thanks. Wooden cabinets, vertical stacking draining wet dishes over dry, and is that an electrical appliance directly underneath in that picture?
      Thanks but I have enough problems keeping the humidity and mould in my house under control. Not to mention that using the hot water in the tap now makes the cabinets above a steam trap.

    44. Re:Not needed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I grew up with a dishwasher that didn't really work. So all dishes had to be pre-washed. The dishwasher was a rinse cycle with detergent.

      I know lots of older people who still pre-wash. They only need the "light" cycle. The regular cycle on my current dishwasher will wash a burned casserole dish on "regular", so no idea what someone would need heavy duty for. Maybe if they use their diswasher to wash car wheels. The Eco on mine saves 25% power, but washes quicker at a lower temp, and skips the dry cycle. If I'm there when it ends, and can wait, mostly clean dishes wash fine, and I open the dishwasher at the end for overnight drying of the dishes, using the dishwasher rack as a drying rack. But that energy savings is rarely used, as I'm often starting it as I go to bed, or just waking up, both times when they cycle doesn't work.

      I usually set it on Auto, and let it go. But I like having the 9 other settings, in case I'm doing something unusual.

      I once owned a Bosch like you describe. It had an IR laser that shot through the waste water sensing contaminatns to determine how many cycles to send it through, and had a disposer built in, so you didn't even need to scrape food before putting it in. It did pretty much have only one setting, "dirty" (called Auto). And you let it do its thing. but paying that much, they had other settings and buttons, so you felt like you had all the control in the world, to press Auto, and walk away.

    45. Re:Not needed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nope, washing by hand uses more energy and water than a dishwasher.

    46. Re:Not needed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nope. Modern dishwashers shouldn't have that requirement. I had a Bosch with a disposer. You could put anything you wanted in there. Make up a nice Christmas meal, and put the plate, uneaten in the dishwasher, along with 15 more just like it. They'd come out sparkling. Provided the green beans didn't get caught sideways somewhere outside the disposer.

      My current budget machine will take care of a casserole dish without issue. No soaking or pre-washing needed. Scrape and wash. Nothing has come out dirty since. Though, if you block the spinning sprayer (can happen if something falls down from the top, or sticks up from the bottom) it doesn't do a good job. But aside from that physical interference, it's never failed to clean anything put in it.

    47. Re:Not needed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Eco for mine has no drying cycle. It's drip dry only. You have to be there when it ends, and crack the door when it finishes, or they get musty and moldy smelling, as the colder eco wash doesn't do a good job sanitizing. Unless I'm planning on being there when it ends and opening the door, and am in no hurry from the longer, colder wash, I won't use it.

    48. Re:Not needed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Cloudy glasses is an issue of water and soap quality. And you use less water and power with a dishwasher.

    49. Re:Not needed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      My old '50s dishwasher I grew up with used the house hot water, but the higher end dishwashers use cold only. They have more control of the water temp, and use less power than using hot water, and didn't get hot hot water when plugged into hot water anyway, for the reason you mention.

      Do they plug into hot anymore? Even the last cheap one I looked at was cold only.

    50. Re:Not needed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Uses a LOT less water than a dishwasher. A lot less noise, too.

      A dishwasher uses less water and power than hand washing. And a good dishwasher is quiet. If you can hear it, it's your fault for not buying the quiet one. Much less sound than the sound of running water.

    51. Re:Not needed by Cederic · · Score: 1

      But much less personal effort. Shit, washing the dishwasher all by itself outweighs any benefits it might add, and it doesn't add benefits anyway.

      I do spend less time washing up than my friends spend loading their dishwashers.

    52. Re:Not needed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The problem I see people have is they pile dishes in the sink. You don't use the sink to wash dishes, why are you filling you sink with them? Empty the dishwasher, then fill the dishwasher up with the dirty dishes as you make them. Don't store them in the sink until you have a load. Store them in the dishwasher.

      Faster, cleaner, less power, less water. The dishwasher is superior in every measure.

    53. Re: Not needed by Izuzan · · Score: 1

      Mine is flat rate for 3 months (unless i some how use more than 90SqM of water in those 3 months. (i could fill my swimming pool 3 times with that amount)

    54. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your using more water to wash you dishes by hand than a modern dishwasher id say your doing it wrong.

    55. Re:Not needed by jrrnetflix · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I have another dishwasher that has controls for "wash top rack only", "bottom rack only", reduce water jet force to protect delicate crystal, delayed start (to run when electricity is cheaper), and other stuff I forget. Not essential, but useful at times.

    56. Re:Not needed by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not true the way I do it. There's no need to rinse if you use the right dishwashing liquid. Glasses come out clean without water spots, cutlery is nice and shiny, etc. So, only need a sink full of hot soapy water.

      Water with a good detergent slides off the glass, as opposed to plain water, which beads and spots. If you washed it properly, the soap drains off with the water, hence no need for rinsing. I discovered this earlier this year, and it hasn't failed me yet.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    57. Re:Not needed by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      A dishwasher uses power to heat the water, run the dishwasher, and heat the dishes to remove moisture at the end of the cycle. My way only uses energy to head 1 sink, and washes more than one sink full of dishes. So, less power, less water (no rinse, no extra-long cycle). No water spots on glasses or cutlery.

      As for quiet, My way, you only hear the running water while filling the sink.

      Eventually your dishwasher is going to need to be repaired or replaced. Sinks last longer, and cost less to replace.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    58. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need more than three different cycles, you're doing it wrong. Try not leaving cruddy dishes accumulate for so long (or do them by hand in the first place).

      Trying to remember the last time I used anything other than the "Smart Wash" button on mine in the past 3 years. We run it once a week on average and rarely does anything come out of there less than squeaky clean.

      Most of our pots and pans get hand washed anyway because washing machines tend to erode the teflon coatings much faster and I always spray them down at the sink once I'm done serving before residue has a chance to harden or congeal and require scrubbing in the first place.

    59. Re:Not needed by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I always spray them down at the sink once I'm done serving before residue has a chance to harden or congeal and require scrubbing in the first place.

      Dogs are great for getting even baked-on grime off of pots and pans. They'll just lick and lick and lick until there's nothing left.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    60. Re:Not needed by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Totally untrue. It takes more of your effort to wash dishes by hand, and it's highly unlikely that you're able to do it at a temperature that will properly disinfect the dishes.

      If you spend less time washing than you friends do loading, you have dirty dishes.

    61. Re:Not needed by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Yes, absolutely.

      Dirty dishes never touch the sink. Straight to the dishwasher.

      If you have to prewash, you have a bad dishwasher, and you either need to modify it or replace it.

    62. Re:Not needed by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      No you aren't.

      Washing the dishes is the dishwasher's job, not mine. Put them in dirty.

      If they don't come out clean, fix or replace your dishwasher.

    63. Re:Not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But only if there is a wooden closet around it like in the photo. If it's just an open wireframe, there's no place where water could accumulate. It doesn't need to be above the sink either -- the small amount of runoff water will just evaporate. In fact it's better if it's not above the sink because of splashing and vapor.

    64. Re:Not needed by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      If you need more than three different cycles, you're doing it wrong. Try not leaving cruddy dishes accumulate for so long (or do them by hand in the first place).

      pretreatment by a dog can be useful.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    65. Re: Not needed by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Free ? Really ? only time i see "free" water are houses with a Well. Anyone on town/city water have to pay for it. mine costs me $318 every quarter.

      typically, there's a fixed charge and an additional per gallon, which only kicks in over a certain volume. I've never come close to exceeding that, so my marginal cost is zero.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    66. Re:Not needed by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Yep. Straight from the floor back into the cabinets.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    67. Re: Not needed by Izuzan · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you are.

      The place i live now is a Flat rate unless i use more than 90SqM of water, then they charge me more (i can fill my swimming pool 3 times with that amount)

      When i lived in the small city, they charged me as i used the water. no flat rate. my ater bill there was significantly smaller than where i live now. (like $30 a month, as opposed to $100 a month)

    68. Re: Not needed by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you are.

      The place i live now is a Flat rate unless i use more than 90SqM of water, then they charge me more (i can fill my swimming pool 3 times with that amount)

      When i lived in the small city, they charged me as i used the water. no flat rate. my ater bill there was significantly smaller than where i live now. (like $30 a month, as opposed to $100 a month)

      Huh. that latter leads to the strange situation where the utility nags you to conserve and use less, then when everybody's conserving and using less the utility has to raise the rates to keep in business.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    69. Re: Not needed by Izuzan · · Score: 1

      generally around here, if they come to us telling us to conserve they get told to pound sand. they allocated 90,000 liters of water to us, we paid for that much, we will use it.

      actually had a co worker have a guy from the municipality drive around and told him to turn off his hose as he was watering his garden. He looked at the guy and said "There is 1 person living in this house, i pay the same amount per month as the family of 6 across the road, i will use as much water as i want, now fuck off" and put the hose down on his driveway still running and walked inside.

  3. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    you'd just be better off building your own dishwasher. Even if this works, it removes the reliability of the unit and breaks warranty, so it's definitely not worth the effort.

  4. Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Frankly, the only useful dishwasher modes are water saving, normal, and heavy/pots and pans. Everything else (especially fine china settings) is just a gimmick.

    1. Re:Why bother? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      I would perhaps add the "raclette cycle " that swiss dishwashers have as usefull, but have to admit that's only a very limited scope...

      --
      bickerdyke
    2. Re:Why bother? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      My Kenmore has a Turbo Zone, a whole set of sprayers intended to zap the really crusty pan I set in front of them.

      It also has High Temp Washes, heating the water. Take that, you tree huggers!

      And Heated Dry. Obvious.

      Hey, Poster, check out the plugs for the control panel, if it's the same as the higher models, risk a few bucks and buy a control panel for a higher model on eBay or something, and plug it in. If it has a heater, it can heat water and dry just fine.If it has a pump, it might have a two-speed, but that's unlikely. Otherwise, most cycle differences are time and temp.

      And experiment with detergents.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    3. Re: Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, if I don't use it then you don't use it!

  5. Dishwasher hackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    That would get you a life sentence. Better to buy a machine.

  6. You live in a condo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You start monkeying around with the plumbing and there's a leak, and you are found responsible, your insurance company will gladly pay for all the damage and happily increase your premiums by 10x as soon as they can.

  7. TSP by mpoulton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Adding a few spoonfuls of trisodium phosphate to your dishwasher is hack #1. Most consumer-grade detergents these days no longer contain phosphates, since they act as fertilizers and promote algae growth when everyone disposes of large quantities in wastewater. Unfortunately, the missing phosphates have not been replaced with anything as effective at cleaning your dishes. Trisodium phosphate (TSP) is sold in powdered form in the paint section of hardware stores, because it is used for surface preparation. It's cheap. Don't get the "TSP Substitute" - it's not effective, just like the weak new detergents these days. Toss a couple teaspoons of real TSP in with your detergent for truly clean dishes, if you're not too concerned about the plague of algae growth. It works extremely well.

    --
    I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    1. Re:TSP by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the missing phosphates have not been replaced with anything as effective at cleaning your dishes.

      Is your dishwasher 100 years old?
      Do you eat 2-part epoxy for dinner and let it dry on your plate before attempting to wash?
      Are you washing dishes that were made dirty in 10000BC and are hoping the fossilized dirt will just wash off?

      Just what exactly are you doing that requires something more than a dirt cheap dishwasher and cheap discount store bought powder to get your dishes clean?

    2. Re:TSP by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      TSP is for wimps. Muriatic acid is where it's at. Cleans up everything in one jiffy. Plates, pets, your relatives that won't leave.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:TSP by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Seconded. It also works wonders for laundry, which suffers from the same issues.

      One of my recurring problems was yellow staining on the armpits of (white) shirts (which would also make the shirt smell bad when worn really really quickly). Turns out it was just oil buildup which wasn't being washed away by the crippled detergents we now have (and which provided a safe little feeding ground for bacteria). I soaked the affected shirts in a solution with a tablespoon of TSP and detergent pre wash and voila. Now I just add some TSP about every three washes to prevent buildup and I haven't seen (or smelled!) any stains since.

      Added bonus is that my laundry now feels clean and crisp post wash.

    4. Re: TSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Muriatic acid is for wimps. My friend Walter recommends using hydrofluoric acid.

    5. Re:TSP by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

      Phosphates are incredibly bad for the environment. There's a reason they were phased out.

      Detergents are more than plenty powerful enough - they're capable of etching glass if they're too strong (my mother's glasses are all an etched milky-white because for years she's filled the detergent box to capacity.)

      You shouldn't be using more than a few teaspoons of anything. It doesn't take much to wash your dishes.

      If it's not washing properly, something is wrong, like the water thermostat, for example.

    6. Re:TSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phosphates are not dangerous, toxic or harmful. The only reason they were phased out is that in the past, wastewater treatment plants were sometimes insufficiently effective in removing them from wastewater and there was already too much phosphate in soil due to fertiliser use in agriculter. However, these problems have since long been solved, so there is no reason not to use phosphates for cleaning dishes or clothing anymore.

      Your comparisons with actually harmful substances are therefore completely beside the point.

    7. Re:TSP by KGIII · · Score: 0

      If you stand up, bounce up and down a few times, and land heavily on your head - you'll knock that sand out of your vagina.

      You do realize that you're ranting at someone on the internet, right? Yeah... You could be right, 1000x over, and they're still not gonna give a shit and now everyone will try it just to piss you off.

      I have a 19 year old dishwasher that I'm told still works but I don't think she's ever actually washed any dishes since she's been with me. Meh, she probably won't wash 'em when we get back home either. That's why you find a nice neighbor and pay them well. Said neighbor is actually down here with us and she has her husband with her. She's "on vacation" so she isn't "allowed" to do the dishes. I've done them myself - I have no idea how the automatic dishwasher works. I'll probably never learn.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re: TSP by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      "hydrofluoric acid" is for wimps, take off, nuke the whole place from orbit... only way to be sure...

    9. Re:TSP by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      An algae which contains neurotoxic domoic acid has shut down the shellfish season in California. I'm not sure we're beyond all algae bloom issues.

    10. Re:TSP by hankwang · · Score: 1

      Yellow underarm stains result from the combination of aluminum/zirconium-based antiperspirants and fatty compounds in sweat. I'm surprised to hear that TSP, as an alkaline compound (pH 12 in moderate concentrations) can remove them.

      There are several patents for products to deal with those stains, and essentially, the approach is to use fairly strong acids in combination with nonionic surfactants. Vinegar is too weak; we're talking about soaking the fabric in 10% hydrochloric acid. AFAIK there is one such product on the market, but not where I live. Anyway, the chemical action of acids is the opposite of that of alkaline compounds; hence my surprise.

    11. Re:TSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "wastewater treatment plants were sometimes insufficiently effective in removing them from wastewater"

      If, according to you, they are "not dangerous, toxic or harmful", why is that a concern????

      "agriculter"

      What the ever unholy fuck?

    12. Re:TSP by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      and how exactly did phospate help to clean anything?

      I was a teen when they phased it out of detergents and I remember it was said to be only some cheap additive to increase the weight of detergent so it could easily be sold as "+20% detergent for free" in the ads, but ignoring that you had to use 25% more of it.

      --
      bickerdyke
    13. Re: TSP by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points for this entire exchange.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    14. Re: TSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bleach AND ammonia, clean both ways at the same time!

    15. Re:TSP by quenda · · Score: 1

      Really? Where? Here in Australia, my Finish dishwasher tablets list ingredients as >30% phosphates.
      They have removed the phosphates from clothes washing powder, but not dishwashing.

    16. Re:TSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drive an old large off road vehicle and I never go off road. I also leave the lights on all the time. Now that I know about TSP (how much it annoys environmentalists), I'll be using heaps of it too. Have a great day.

    17. Re:TSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just went to the hardware store and bought a packet. I'm now going to use it every wash you fat, greasy nigger. Heil Hitler.

    18. Re:TSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good job corroding your dishwasher with TSP, genius. Get tri-sodium polyphosphate (TSPP) for your dishwasher (it's usually sold food-safe too). Save the TSP for washing your siding.

      Or just get a Maytag. They flipped EPA the bird on Energy Star and didn't get rid of the grinder like most manufacturers did. God, I had a Bosch that needed a filter scrubbed by hand every day. What a piece of shit.

    19. Re:TSP by hey! · · Score: 1

      Or you could get a newer dishwasher. I find that a modern dishwasher works fine with the new detergents, and eutrophication is a serious environmental problem especially where wastewater is discharged into freshwater systems. Newer units are also considerably quieter than older dishwashers.

      You add up all the people using phosphates they don't really need all along the watershed and what you get downstream is water covered in green algal scum over dead zones where the oxygen has been depleted. Nutrients can cause also toxic dinoflagellate blooms that kill fish and even sicken people. Phosphates may be particularly damaging in brackish estuaries where it may harm juvenile populations of economically important fish.

      So I strongly advise against routinely adding TSP to your dishwasher.

      Now microorganisms need both phosphorous (for nucleotide and ATP synthesis) and nitrogen (for proteins); if your sewage treatment plant discharges into saltwater it may be that the receiving waters are nitrogen limited rather than phosphorous limited, due to a paucity of nitrogen fixing bacteria. In that case phosphates might not be a major concern, and it might be relatively harmless to add phosphates. I'd check with the public affairs people at your sewage treatment first. But if your treatment plant discharges into freshwater, or if you aren't sure whether it discharges into nitrogen-limited marine waters, I'd stay away from adding phosphates.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    20. Re:TSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you live near an area with heavy chemical industry, chances are that the treatment plant is only rated for natural phosphor excretion. Near where I live some old fart had started to use phosphate powder for cleaning because of ‘dur hur in my days we did it like this’ and all the fish in a nearby lake died from suffocation. He had to pay a huge fine, but that didn't bring the fish back.
      And it's so unnecessary. If you get a modern dishwasher and use standard dishwasher tablets, your dishes will get cleaner faster and with less abrasion than ever.

    21. Re:TSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never seen dishwashing detergent tablets that do not contain phosphates. They usually list it as "> 30% phosphates" or something similar in the composition declaration. Phosphates have been phased out from laundry detergents, but not dishwashing.

    22. Re:TSP by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      If you stand up, bounce up and down a few times, and land heavily on your head - you'll knock that sand out of your vagina.

      You do realize that you're ranting at someone on the internet, right? Yeah....

      This one had me laugh out so hard I spilled coffee over the keyboard, and the dog came up to check my (in)sanity.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    23. Re: TSP by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      This is in the style of the "old" slashdot. Real humour and innocuous sarcasm are vanishing past from /. these days.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    24. Re: TSP by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Nukes are for wimps. Use a black hole. Only way to **really wipe things out. Including yourself, the whole planet and your dog.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    25. Re:TSP by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Phosphates are incredibly bad for the environment. There's a reason they were phased out.

      Still available in industrial fertilizer. Widely used for that still. Phased out of home use, which had little effect on the environment. A box of phosphate detergent poured into a bucket of gasoline made a good napalm. That's why they were phased out. For their bomb making capabilities. The environment was an excuse when people complained, but certainly not the cause, or they'd have gone after the large users, agriculture. But no, targeted the small uses with easy access.

      Detergents are more than plenty powerful enough - they're capable of etching glass if they're too strong (my mother's glasses are all an etched milky-white because for years she's filled the detergent box to capacity.)

      correlation isn't causation. Etched glasses is more likely from the water. If it is from the detergent, it's likely a thermostat issue. The temp should be high enough to dissolve all the detergent, preventing it from etching anything. Or, she always bought the cheapest detergent, and it's half sand and filler.

    26. Re:TSP by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It was an aggressive chemical. It was banned because if you dumped a box of it into a bucket of gasoline, you got a nice napalm. The reactivity that made it good bomb making material made it a good cleaner, reacting with things that shouldn't be there, and cleaning them away.

    27. Re:TSP by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      In the US, the ban was originally for clothes washing powder only. The issue is that the 30% phosphates would make great bomb-making material. But, once it was pointed out that you could just use dishwasher soap, the ban was extended. The Finish tablets are single serving tablets. They are inconvenient to make into bomb making material. You'd have to open or dissolve masses of them to get the same use as a single 5 kg box of clothes washer soap.

      The environmental effects were an excuse, not an initial reason. The ban came about with the Iranian terrorism spike, and was related to US domestic terrorism fears, not environmental concerns. Phosphates are still used widely in the US, just more controlled, like for industrial fertilizer and such. The runoff from that greatly eclipsing the domestic use.

    28. Re:TSP by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Detergents are more than plenty powerful enough - they're capable of etching glass if they're too strong (my mother's glasses are all an etched milky-white because for years she's filled the detergent box to capacity.)

      correlation isn't causation. Etched glasses is more likely from the water. If it is from the detergent, it's likely a thermostat issue. The temp should be high enough to dissolve all the detergent, preventing it from etching anything. Or, she always bought the cheapest detergent, and it's half sand and filler.

      Or she might just own really cheap glassware – the kind that use too much alkali fluxes. They leach out of the glass, and charge equality means that something with 2+ or more charge is going to replace the two alkali lost. Ca2+, and so on. That is, calcium oxide --> calcium hydroxide, which is not (appreciably) water-soluble.

      Go buy some "muriatic acid" (hydrochloric acid) at the hardware store. Mix it 1:3 for the first try, and soak. If that doesn't work, try 1:1. It won't dissolve the glass, but it will etch most metals, so use a big Corningware bowl or baking dish.

      And for gosh-sakes,

          (1) do it outside or in the garage with the door open,

          (2) wear goggles and gloves,

          (3) dilute the hell out of it when it comes time to dispose of the mixture, and

          (4) Run lots or water, like 100x, behind it. Otherwise, you will cause major plumbing problems, no matter where you dispose of it.

    29. Re:TSP by mannd · · Score: 1

      Lemishine in the detergent dispenser plus a Finish powerball in the utensil tray. Keeps the inside of the dishwasher clean and does a great job on the dishes. Doesn't matter what cycle you use.

      --
      Sig expected Real Soon Now.
    30. Re:TSP by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      OK. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... backs what you're saying. However, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/... (like the article on Phosphate) doens't mention any use as active cleaning agent. According to that article, it's only use was to lower water hardness but is an important part food additive.

      Never thought chemistry would be one of the cultural differences between the US and Europe.... But at least you're using the same gravity as we do over here, don't you?

      --
      bickerdyke
    31. Re:TSP by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      According to that article, it's only use was to lower water hardness but is an important part food additive.

      Softening water performs a cleaning function. The person pushing TSP as a cleaning agent later talks about his issues with hard water. So he's not using it as a cleaning agent, but as a water softener that works with the cleaning agent for a better result.

      So the cultural gap isn't about science, but in the discussion of complex multivariate real world problems. A cleaning booster that doesn't actually clean, but softens water so the other cleaning agents work better could be described as a cleaner, or a non-cleaner.

    32. Re:TSP by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      So you don't believe that yellow stains can be just fat buildup (which TSP excels at removing)? Try looking at an old pillowcase.
      No sir, you are wrong and are letting a specific bit of knowledge close your mind to other possibilities. Everything I said in my previous post is still as true as it was when it actually happened.

    33. Re:TSP by hankwang · · Score: 1

      Tut, tut, calm down and take your meds.

    34. Re:TSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yellow stains are the result of aluminum-based antiperspirants interacting with your sweat. It's not just oil. You can avoid this by switching to an alcohol-based deodorant.

    35. Re: TSP by JigJag · · Score: 1

      "Hydrofluoric acid" is for wimps. My friend Hank recommends using Chlorine Trifluoride/

      --
      "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
    36. Re:TSP by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Man up and admit that you made a false claim based on incomplete knowledge.

  8. Re:Try using alcohol by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ethanol is an effective solvent for a wide range of materials.

    I've tried consuming various quantities of ethanol before washing dishes. In my experience it doesn't help at all.

  9. Replace the computer completely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    raspi or similar.

    But what do you want to get better? How many fancy actuators does this thing have, that could make more programs useful? Heating water, pumping through the rotors, open flaps for solvent, pump to remove water. Anything else? What do you want to optimize for? Low energy consumption, good cleaning result, fast completion, ...?

  10. The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by xtronics · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason they suck is they now have very weak motors - to change that out is not an easy modification. One can change the computer to use enough water.

    People are washing on the long cycles and multiple times - using a lot of water in the sink rinsing so they will get clean - the regs are not doing what they think.

    I wish I could have the Maytag I bought in 1986 - it worked really well.

    They have destroyed Dishwashers, Washing machines, water-heaters, shower heads (they did improve conditioners. )

    I just want the government to stay the F*** out of my life.

    1. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the above.

      I live in an apartment and they had to replace my dishwasher (it was a cheap GE and may have been 20 years old). The replacement dishwasher was almost identical in appearance, 'features' (hardly any) and also a GE -- a cheapo model.

      The old one took, for a full cycle, about 48 minutes -- the new one takes 1 hour and 53 minutes. The old one had a strong spray, the new one a very weak one. I'm sure this all saves energy in some theoretical world. However, I now have to clean the dishes better before I put them in to insure they are always clean when they are done and this is wasteful of water, energy to heat the water, and time. I always run the full cycle now as that seems to be necessary (due, I think, to the weaker spray). And, probably worst of all, I run a lot of 1/2 loads on the assumption that I may want to have space for cooking utensils later depending what I decide to cook for the next meal and I don't want to wait almost two hours for the existing partially filled load to run after I decide I'm going to cook (and, I often don't decide to). On the upside, it's quieter and I'm not billed for cold or hot water based on usage so the waste of prewashing and extra cycles isn't coming out of my pocketbook in a direct way.

      I dread the day they have to replace the washing machine with a modern model with two hour cycle times. I'm thinking of buying a house and, if I do, I may try to locate an old used washing machine with short cycle times. Do people like spending their lives doing laundry to save a few gallons of water (well, it's not really 'saved' anyway - a washing machine doesn't transform H2O into another substance or turn it into energy!) and a little energy?

      (Oh, the dishwasher racks were also made out of much thinner gauge wire on the new one - and instead of having wire 'pegs' sticking up, the new one has 'loops'. I suspect the 'loops' are necessary because the thinner gauge wire would bend too easily - but in some situations these loops result in not being able to fit as many dishes in. This, though, I'm pretty sure had nothing to do with energy regulations -- just a bean counter and an engineer conspiring to drive costs down on a model that is bought by one person -- a landlord -- whose entire focus is on cost and used by someone else -- a tenant -- whose entire focus is on functionality.)

    2. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      I really like my High Efficiency washing machine.
      Most of the settings take longer to wash clothes but some are comparable to my previous 80's Maytag and it gives way more control over water temperature and RPM.

      Now the dryer that's paired with it? Absolutely terrible compared to my previous dryer.
      I have to run clothes through it twice (and each run is longer than the previous dryer.)
      It's a little bit quieter and that's about the only plus.

      And there were definitely a lot of junk appliances back in the day. Just look at any old apartment. Ugh.
      I think regulations are less important than the typical some-are-good and some-are-cheap-shit.

      Like shower heads -- a lot have always been terrible and some are good. You can always take the flow regulator out if you want to.

    3. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      When a feel good regulation means you end up using more resources that helps how? It's great that it used 50% less water till you have to run it twice to actually get it clean.

      Sure in a sane world it would use a reliable sensor that determines when it's clean coupled with other things like higher pressure or other things to be more effective while maintaining reliability.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    4. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, the chances are that you voted for Obama and the other Democrats who have been crapping on your life for decades.

      Want Democrat?
      Got Over-regulation?

    5. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by dbl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The reason they suck is they now have very weak motors - to change that out is not an easy modification. One can change the computer to use enough water.

      People are washing on the long cycles and multiple times - using a lot of water in the sink rinsing so they will get clean - the regs are not doing what they think.

      I wish I could have the Maytag I bought in 1986 - it worked really well.

      They have destroyed Dishwashers, Washing machines, water-heaters, shower heads (they did improve conditioners. )

      I just want the government to stay the F*** out of my life.

      If you rinsed the gunk off your plates as soon as you finished eating, threw them into the dishwasher and ran the dishwasher before your food had a chance to get dried out, moldy and lord knows what else, the dishwasher would work just fine on a single cycle.

      --
      Hammer Software http://hammersoftware.ca/ Good service, Creative solutions - Hamilton, ON
    6. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the regulations did improve electric waterheaters.

      the tank size is the same. the element wattage is the same. however the regulations made them get off their ass and use better insulation than the old fiberglass crap.

      which never would have been required if they'd done it on their own instead of being forced to.

      But yeah. dishwashers and washing machines. holy fuck the efficiency regulations really ruined those. especially washing machines.
      what used to take 1 wash to get clean. now takes 3.

      such a piece of shit.

    7. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by xtronics · · Score: 1

      You do realize why they had to change the soap for 'high efficiency' washing machines? They use so little water that there is still soap in the clothes - so it had to be changed so it wouldn't irritate the skin.

      I would rather have a machine that really gets the clothes clean and well rinsed.

    8. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Our precious bodily fluids.

    9. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by xtronics · · Score: 0

      Yes - you are right - it isn't like water falls out of the sky or something...

      Here is a hint - don't live in deserts and let those of us that don't use all the water we want - water isn't 'used up' . What do they teach people in school these days?

      The only reason we are burning stuff to make electricity is the excessive regulations that prevented the development of cheap nuclear power. Ludites.

      There is a real world to enjoy.

      It is sad that so many are falling for the fake crises to promote world socialism - of course it will be world tyranny - and there will be no where to run to - they will make slaves of your children.

    10. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by sribe · · Score: 1

      Sure in a sane world it would use a reliable sensor that determines when it's clean coupled with other things like higher pressure or other things to be more effective while maintaining reliability.

      Good dishwashers today are far better at getting dishes clean than the old ones you guys are whining about missing. (Maybe the mediocre ones today are worse than the mediocre ones of years gone by. I don't know. I try to avoid buying crappy appliances.)

    11. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have the future generations ever done for us?

    12. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by AaronW · · Score: 1

      That's simply a matter of buying a cheap dishwasher. I recently replaced mine as well. It works much better than the old one, using less water and energy in the process and you can barely hear it running, plus the rack is much better protected so it should last a lot longer.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    13. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    14. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by AaronW · · Score: 1

      No, the HE soap is designed so it doesn't produce suds. Since the washer spins the clothes at a much higher speed, it gets more of the soapy water out. There's no noticeable soap in my clothes with my HE washer.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    15. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by AaronW · · Score: 1

      My new one works better than my old ancient top loader. It depends on which one you get. It takes longer to wash, but it takes a lot less time drying now.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    16. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing xtronics point.

      By making dishwashers with weaker motors and that uses less/colder water, you end up "prewashing" the dishes (use more water) and using longer cycles, or even running them twice. That doens't save any energy or water. Weaker detergents doen't help either.

      Same thing with low flow toilets. You have to flush twice...

    17. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between "conserving our precious natural resources" and greenwashing. Low flow toilets are a pretty good example, I still have one of the first generation of them, the ones which require multiple flushes to get rid of a few squares of TP. Most of those LF toilets were dismal failures, using far more water than their standard counterparts. Most newer models have overcome those shortfalls but how many resources were wasted because of the idiotic push to force them into the market before they were ready.

    18. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over yourself.

      Fuk-a-shima showed that less nuclear regulations is definetly not the answer. The economics of them as currently imagined just don't work. I wish they did.

    19. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed out the big one. In many places phosphate detergent is banned. Phosphates work very well to clean dishes. I find the non-phosphate stuff useless.

      A tablespoon or two of real TSP (not the fake shit) fixes that.

    20. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect! The solution is to rinse first (extra water consumption) and run the dishwasher three times a day, once per meal (about 6 times more often than I used to).

      Sounds like the regs are doing their jobs. If you're the water company and power company, that is.

    21. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so Tim.

    22. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the above.

      I live in an apartment and they had to replace my dishwasher (it was a cheap GE and may have been 20 years old). The replacement dishwasher was almost identical in appearance, 'features' (hardly any) and also a GE -- a cheapo model.

      The old one took, for a full cycle, about 48 minutes -- the new one takes 1 hour and 53 minutes. The old one had a strong spray, the new one a very weak one. I'm sure this all saves energy in some theoretical world.

      Yes, the one where you use a motor running slower (aka, using less energy), for longer, and still get the job done.

      That your landlord managed to get an apparently crappy dishwasher is a problem, but what would you have us do? Make him replace it because you're not satisfied? Make whatever holding company owns the GE consumer line do it?

      However, I now have to clean the dishes better before I put them in to insure they are always clean when they are done and this is wasteful of water, energy to heat the water, and time. I always run the full cycle now as that seems to be necessary (due, I think, to the weaker spray). And, probably worst of all, I run a lot of 1/2 loads on the assumption that I may want to have space for cooking utensils later depending what I decide to cook for the next meal and I don't want to wait almost two hours for the existing partially filled load to run after I decide I'm going to cook (and, I often don't decide to).

      Sounds like a personal problem, maybe you should change your habits. Or get more utensils. Whatever works, it's your decisions that are causing this to happen, not the dishwasher. In any case, my new dishwasher works fine, uses less water, and the time it takes?

      Means nothing to me, I fill it up, wash it, and go on about my life.

      I dread the day they have to replace the washing machine with a modern model with two hour cycle times. I'm thinking of buying a house and, if I do, I may try to locate an old used washing machine with short cycle times.

      You should probably change your priorities before going to the trouble of buying a house. You'll be looking for the wrong things to worry about.

      Do people like spending their lives doing laundry to save a few gallons of water (well, it's not really 'saved' anyway - a washing machine doesn't transform H2O into another substance or turn it into energy!) and a little energy?

      I don't know about you, but the reason I got a washing machine was so I could walk off and do something else while it was working. And yes, if you want to be a literal pedant, a more proper expression might be that it reduces the amount of water used, rather than saved, but such is communication, often we use less than exactly precise terms.

      Sometimes this is acceptable, sometimes it is confusing, sometimes it just makes you sound like an ass to point it out. This is the latter.

      (Oh, the dishwasher racks were also made out of much thinner gauge wire on the new one - and instead of having wire 'pegs' sticking up, the new one has 'loops'. I suspect the 'loops' are necessary because the thinner gauge wire would bend too easily - but in some situations these loops result in not being able to fit as many dishes in. This, though, I'm pretty sure had nothing to do with energy regulations -- just a bean counter and an engineer conspiring to drive costs down on a model that is bought by one person -- a landlord -- whose entire focus is on cost and used by someone else -- a tenant -- whose entire focus is on functionality.)

      Mine has pegs, for what it's worth. Maybe it's just that brand or model line. Not like GE makes much of anything for consumers anymore, they've licensed their name out all over the place.

      I'd say get another cage that fits your rollers if you want.

    23. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears to vary with washer model. My washer is terrible. We have to use extra rinse cycle to rinse all the soap out. We are using half of the recommended dose of the soap. Plus we have run smaller loads as it does not clean large loads as well. It is whirlpool HE model and it is terrible. I replaced regular whirlpool which was running for 14 years. I wish I just wold have fixed it since I knew exactly what was wrong but foolishly thought new washer would be more efficient. My laundry and dishes should not be government's business.

    24. Re: The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They haven't used their time machines to come back and kill you, yet. That's gotta count for something.

    25. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The reason they suck is they now have very weak motors - to change that out is not an easy modification.

      ^^^^ This. The Energy Star program has effectively turned most modern appliances into expensive bookends. The motors, pumps, heaters, etc etc are all smaller, and by "smaller" I mean "too small to work effectively".

      Yes, I'm all for saving energy, but not at the price of reducing and/or destroying functionality. My old Kenmore dishwasher worked for 17 years, no problems, and it cleaned the living hell out of anything we put in it. Newer dishwashers need hotter water and longer cycles because the pussified pumps and motors just don't do the job as well (if at all).

      I suspect that with appliances like dishwashers and washing machines that in the end there is often little or no savings realized, and possibly the overall energy cost is actually greater.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    26. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every washing machine will work better than a top loader.

    27. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by KGIII · · Score: 1

      A few weeks back, I gave an address to a piece of my property. It was that silly three word address thing, that thread. I'm not there now but I'll be back in the spring. Anyhow, it's on the side of a mountain, in the NW part of Maine, with a true artesian well, and it appears that there's a whole bunch of water in it. As in, my actual well is at a lower elevation than my house and I don't actually need a pump to get it to my house. I have a pump house but that's more to regulate the flow so it doesn't blow my taps off when spring comes or it rains heavily. Well, not quite that bad I don't think but I am not a plumber.

      At any rate, add to that the fact that I own *all* the land around me in almost every direction - I'll own the next chunk to my NE when my neighbor's pass away. We've reached a verbal agreement and I'm just going to pay them ahead of time, let them remain in it, and they can give the money to their kids who don't want to own the farm. There's a couple that live there and work the farm for them, or most of it, and I'm just going to let them live there in exchange for running the farm. They can keep the profits so long as they maintain the property. I'll probably put it in some sort of trust.

      Basically, there is zero chance of me running out of water. If I am out of water - the rest of the world is pretty much fucked. I don't even consume electricity to pump the water, it's a true artesian well. I don't dump a bunch of chemicals into the water, that'd not be cool. Even if I did, I have a pretty fancy leech field but I still don't. What I do want is to be able to buy a damned showerhead that's good. I've tried a bunch of expensive ones and I don't really like any of them. I can do a quick Naval shower or the likes but I kind of like my hot showers. I like it to pound the hell out of my head and back and turn me beet red. I want to step out of the shower bright red and not just from the water being hot.

      On the other hand, I bought nice toilets. They're low flow but I did some reading first and ended up spending a bit on 'em but they work better than the old style. They're shaped a little funny in the bowl and the drain's a little different looking but I used to put a whole lot of opiates into me and that means that I'd shit a sticky brick and these deal with it just famously. Seriously, that stuff's like almost cured cement or something. Err... I don't have pictures of the toilet or I'd share the model name. They're pretty good though.

      If you ever get in a fight and get arrested or something, make sure you get locked down in a cell by yourself. It will have the ultimate toilet in it. It's made of metal and has a sink built in but, wow... Those things can suck down a sheet, socks, pillow case, papers, food, utensils, and probably a cat. I'm only slightly less utilitarian than that so I didn't opt for one of those. It would be awesome, however.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    28. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by sjames · · Score: 1

      They have been ready for a long time. Part of the problem is that manufacturers tend to make the minimum change necessary to technically meet the spec rather than actually meeting the spec until the old models can no longer be sold at all. Then finally, they compete on the performance.

    29. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      "not the farmers who...export a lot of food that people way outside the state enjoy eating."

      Food exportation is the worst cause of pollution and global warming. We should be designing our cities to be food production areas, thus reducing air conditioner usage. We should also only be eating what can be raised locally.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    30. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by slacktide · · Score: 1

      I can confirm that Whirlpool HE (Actually mine was a Kenmore HE3t, which is a re-labeled Whirlpool Duet Sport) laundry machines do not rinse adequately and you need to select the "extra rinse" button every single time. However, I chalk that up to sub-par American engineering, as we replaced that turd with Samsung HE WA456 and it is GREAT.

    31. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      The electrical appliances that companies make should definitely be the government's business for the obvious reasons.

      And when there's a drought or an oil crisis or a general resource shortage then regulation, and thus efficient devices, will be a godsend.
      Instead of rationing you might just have business as usual. Or, you know, maybe the resource shortage won't even happen because we're being forced to be more efficient.

      I'm sorry your new Whirlpool washer sucks but I'd blame that on Whirlpool, not Department of Energy minimum standards.
      You could maybe blame California's large market and local California regulation for driving policy.

      My dead grandmother, who lived through the Great Depression and World War 2, would be shaking her head at us for being spoiled.

    32. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Sure in a sane world it would use a reliable sensor that determines when it's clean

      Like they are used even in the cheapest dishwashers nowadays?

      --
      bickerdyke
    33. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      At any rate, add to that the fact that I own *all* the land around me in almost every direction - I'll own the next chunk to my NE when my neighbor's pass away.

      Which is pretty cool, I have to admit. So, how could we turn this into a feasible laternative for the >7.5 billion poeple currently living on this planet?

      --
      bickerdyke
    34. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately soap bubbles form on the water surface in the washing machine. With the lower agitation of HE machines, they never get pulled under the water. Then the rinse cycle starts spinning, and your clothes are used like a coffee filter for all those soap bubbles. I wondered where all the soap on my clothes was coming from when I got caught in the rain. Not to mention the ongoing contact dermatitis.

      On my old HE washing machine, trying to fix this, I ran my clothes through 15 cycles one day trying to get rid of the soap. It never happened. Eventually I took to scooping the soap bubbles off the surface by hand. End results: Washing clothes was now done in half or quarter loads. It took 2-5 wash cycles per quarter load, each one about 90 minutes in length. A single load of wash took several days to launder, I was always doing laundry, and my back was killing me from hauling half a ton of water out of that washing by hand machine every week.

      It was the first time I ever got rid of a "working" washing machine.

      I switched to a SpeedQueen washer. Definitely NOT HE. It's like 70s technology. 35 minutes for a load of laundry, 50 if I add in the extra rinse. Sadly it still takes 80 minutes to dry clothes. But I can really load up that SpeedQueen. 7 pairs of jeans instead of 1 or 2.

      As SpeedQueens are not "High Efficiency" washing machine, in another year, maybe less, SpeedQueens will be outlawed. That said, both my water and my electric bills dropped dramatically when I switched away from HE. Go figure. 35 minutes for a load of wash vs all day for several days. Full sized loads instead of tiny partial loads. Laundry cleaned on the first run through. I can do an entire week's worth of laundry in one morning.

    35. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by swb · · Score: 1

      I've read that dishwashers work by chemistry, not hydrology. Meaning it's not the quantity and pressure of the water spraying your dishes, but the work of the dishwasher detergent that actually cleans your dishes. The spraying is mostly about evenly distributing the chemistry and effectively rinsing it off.

      I'm on my 3rd dishwasher, a midrange Bosch, and so far it's the best one I've ever owned. The first one (already ~5 years old when we bought the house) was a Frigidaire and mediocre. The second one was a Kenmore (OEM Kitchenaid) and it was a definite improvement, but eventually it quit getting dishes clean for reasons I couldn't figure out. It based the full suite of embedded self-tests, drew a reasonable supply of water, pumped out said water fine and seemed to spray well internally, but nothing came clean.

      The Bosch that replaced it gets dishes cleaner than any of them, is so quiet that you literally can't tell it's running by sound and somehow uses some kind of gimmick to dry the dishes without a bake dry cycle that melts plastics.

      Both my Bosch and my Kenmore have automagic "optimum clean" cycles that use some kind of sensors to measure the water to gauge cleanliness. I just wish they had some kind of serial port on them that would let you monitor sensor outputs so you could figure out when a machine was mechanically operating well (i.e., pumping, spraying, etc) what was wrong with the sensor system to figure out why it wasn't cleaning well.

      I think it would also help to have a harsh-ish chemical that could be dumped in to an empty machine and companion self-clean cycle that would pump said chemical through the system to clean the inevitable buildup of gunk in the plumbing that renders cleaning sensors less effective and probably gets blasted a little every time back onto your dishes, even in a rinse cycle.

      The good(?) news is that dishwashers are pretty trivial to swap out anymore. About the only thing missing, really, is a standardized slide-out drawer assembly the unit can be fitted to with a worm drive you could turn from the front with a screwdriver to raise/level the machine to optimally fill the cabinet opening. Ideally with a floor pan with a drain hose that could be dropped down through the floor into a basement floor drain in case a fitting gave out.

    36. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by xtronics · · Score: 1

      Homework assignment - look up the deaths/KWH generated of different forms of power generation.
      http://motherboard.vice.com/bl...

      Fukushima was bad - and yes a few people died - more will later but nothing compared to other methods (see
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ) how many die every year in the oil and coal business?

      Those were old technology plants that didn't get updated like they did in the USA. There are newer safer technologies that are not going on line due to the insane regulations.

        By stopping nuclear plants - it has cost a lot of lives - dead in the middles east - cost of imported oil it would have replaced has been estimated to be similar to the national debt.

    37. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to reduce one of the variables in your equation. Three guesses as to which one.

    38. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      forgot low flow toilets, uses 1/3 the water have to flush them 3 times cause they dont have enough ommph to get that giant turd down

    39. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Actually, they've got those figured out now, so long as you buy one of the better models. I replaced a mid-1990's model a couple years back with an American Standard Champion 4 and it has never clogged, not even once while managing to use even less water than low flow it replaced. The early low-flow toilets were awful. Some of them were pretty much the previous design with a baffle in the tank so less water would flush.

    40. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Toto Drake - best low flow toilet I've ever seen and I've yet to replace a part in mine after more than 5 years. I chose it after speaking to multiple plumbers at a trade show - they told me these things were great and I had one installed in my new addition. WOW! Works great. I wish I'd gotten the soft close lid option and the taller height but when I replace the rest of my toilets I WILL get those options :-)

      Oh and it doesn't cost a pile more than the junk at the big box stores...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    41. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Buy a tankless - endless hot water on demand! I compared the two efficiency graphs between the newish one I was dumping (remodel) and the new tankless. The tankless was way to the left in the cheap zone and the other was mode to the middle of the right on the higher cost zone. Then I realized that the two graphs didn't overlap! I was skeptical but sure enough my gas usage in the Summer time when the only appliance using gas was the water heater went down year to year in the first year I owned it. Hell in the Summer the fees cost me as much or more than my gas usage. I have endless hot water too for as long as I want to shower. The only two issues are that in super freezing temps I have to be careful not to run the shower and the jets at the same time as it can begin to overrun the heater with the arctic water coming in. The second "issue" was that I was required to get and use a softener because the water here is so hard it would kill the heating coils as they superheated the water flowing through. Not been a big deal though as the soap works much better and I got the added benefit of a whole house filter :-)

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    42. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by schnell · · Score: 1

      We should also only be eating what can be raised locally.

      I would love to be there when you tell the 8 million residents of Manhattan that all they should be eating is junk bonds.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    43. Re: The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your house just got robbed, because the damned government decided to not serve you anymore and this includes the police. Wow

    44. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between "conserving our precious natural resources" and greenwashing. Low flow toilets are a pretty good example, I still have one of the first generation of them, the ones which require multiple flushes to get rid of a few squares of TP. Most of those LF toilets were dismal failures, using far more water than their standard counterparts. Most newer models have overcome those shortfalls but how many resources were wasted because of the idiotic push to force them into the market before they were ready.

      The problem is, if the push didn't happen, we'd still be using 10 gallon flush toilets. The low-flow toilets sucked, yes, but it forced innovation on the market - because they sucked, people went on to do the R&D to make even lower flow toilets that work even better than the old toilets ever did, all while consuming a couple of gallons of water. (Low-flows the first gen were only half).

      You have to realize that innovation can either happen organically, or more often than not, in response to regulation and consumer choice. Consumer choice is hard, because those who buy into the new technologies are few and far between, and without an external push, often are too small a market to care.

      Take electric cars - the first gens sucked, but now we're getting decent ranges (enough to go about town), and while Tesla is still the king for long range, there are competitors coming to the market.

      Otherwise, what happens is people don't care.

      Take CFCs. They were phased out in the 80s. Except for one industry - asthma inhalers. They got an except that died out in 2015 or so. So for 20+ years, they got a pass, while everyone else from air conditioners to refrigerators have moved on to CFC-free alternatives. In fact, the first gen of those sucked, too, but those have evolved as people wanted better cooling.

      What did the makers of asthma inhalers do? Sure, some moved to a different gas, but they were small and the prices, expensive, while the big guys rested on their laurels for 20+ years. Until their exception came up and there was a big "Oh shit" moment when they realized their deadline was coming up. And the only alternative sucked because it was pricier because no one bought them despite being early to the market for a CFC-free inhaler.

      And that really is a problem - industry won't change unless they're forced to. It's always been that way. It's why they fight long and hard against everything from smoking, flame retardants, leaded fuels, and climate change - they don't want to change and evolve, they just want to rake in money the same way.

      Hell, aviation still uses leaded gas - but even that industry is changing because the writing's on the wall - the EPA is wanting to crack down on leaded avgas (no doubt spurred by many environmental groups), and all the big industry players know it's coming - either adapt and find a new fuel now or suffer dearly when it's gone. And the signs are there - Tetraethyl lead is only available from one company in the UK, refineries hate it because they can't mix leaded and unleaded processes (and unleaded sells more, so the need to clean the processes really sucks) so fewer are able to refine it, and the demand isn't there - one day's production of leaded avgas is sufficient to meet the needs of North America's avgas needs for an entire year. So an unleaded alternative is desired because the economics are finally not making sense, and pressure is being applied by the government to seek alternatives. There are a few lead-free alternatives to avgas already being tested, some by research labs, others by big oil companies. And heck, there's even diesel - sure it requires a new engine, but you go from avgas to Jet-A, which is stupidly easy to get, fairly cheap, and available literally everywhere (avgas is harder to find, while Jet-A is the same stuff airliners use so there's huge distribution networks and infrastructure and lots of competition)

    45. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Probably not. So then why make everyone follow the same rules when there are obvious outliers? Why not make everyone get one of those metal toilets from jails? They're low flow but use high pressure. How about the freedom to make responsible choices on your own?

      Don't get me wrong, I know about the tragedy of the commons - that's how we got here in the first place. However, at some point - enough is enough. I could be an ass and use an old showerhead. I could take the low-flow valve out of one. I don't. I live with it but I'd really like a nice one - and I've looked pretty hard and not found one. So, if you're actually wanting to help, hook a guy up, will ya?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    46. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want the government to stay the F*** out of my life.

      They'd stay out of your life if you stopped F***ing up the lives of others.
      They screwed up showerheads? I suppose you think it was your god given right to drown yourself with the largest possible amount of water which you pollute with phosphates as you go pouring it straight down the drain why some of the world doesn't even have access to clean water and many parts are on restricted usage due to it running dry.

      On behalf of all of us everywhere, fuck you, and praises to your government for pulling you back in line.

    47. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mine are slightly taller than most and I think you just named the brand.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    48. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by mjaynes · · Score: 1

      Someday, I'm getting one of these bad boys: http://www.webstaurantstore.co... 120 seconds and done!

    49. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I grew up with a dishwasher made in the early '50s. It didn't wash anything. It made everything wet, but not much else. Some redistribution of grime occurred, but even that was done poorly.

      My '90s machine was a top of the line. But my 2010 low-end dishwasher is still much much better than an '80s or '90s machine.

      I think you have a false nostalgia.

    50. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Sure in a sane world it would use a reliable sensor that determines when it's clean coupled with other things like higher pressure or other things to be more effective while maintaining reliability.

      You just described most dishwashers available today. My older top of the line was one of the first with a reliable sensor to determine cleanliness of the wastewater, and it also had a disposer. My low-end 2010 has the sensor, but not the disposer. And the new low-end machine does much better with things like casserole dishes and baked on food. So long as I don't load something that obstructs the spinning cleaner, I've never had to run anything twice. And I've never pre-soaked or pre-cleaned anything. Scrape off the big pieces, and load. Let it sit until full. Run. Quieter, more efficient, and more effective than older top of the line ones. Yes, it takes longer, but you can fix that by pre-cleaning and using the quick cycle that doesn't clean as well, and doesn't dry them.

    51. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Short cycle is 35 mins on a new washer. But the dishes come out wet. The full cycle is 2 hours. But the dishes are always clean without pre-washing, no matter how dirty or old going in.

      Spray is higher in my new washer. It uses less water, but higher pressures to wash off as much as possible. Also new washers use more cycles. Each cycle is: water in, circulate until dirty, drain. Repeat. Using more cycles with less water uses less overall water than fewer cycles with more water each.

    52. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Not needed. My crusty old moldy food is washed off just fine with a budget 2010 model.

    53. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And I though tankless cared less about hard water, because it pushes the precipitates out to the user, rather than a hot water heater where they collect at the bottom, insulating the tank and increasing the cost to heat. The first house I owned was in Alaska, and the tankless don't work well there. The groundwater is 45F in the middle of summer. For family use, you have to put two tankless in series, and so I just replaced the ancient water heater with another of the same. It's a real shame that the super-efficient boiler (used for heating the house) isn't designed to heat hot water.

    54. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      The new rules are not yet in effect that call for a max of 3.1 gallons per load. Were not yet seeing machines that meet this standard outside of testing models.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    55. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      And Obama new rules just call for 3.1 gallons max no matter what. A sensible rule would be some sort of efficiency as in so much material removed per gallon. This restricts the machine from using more than that amount of water even though it knows the dishes are still dirty.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    56. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off libertarians.
      Seriously.

    57. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not. So then why make everyone follow the same rules when there are obvious outliers?

      It's really hard to craft unique rules for every situation.

      Why not make everyone get one of those metal toilets from jails? They're low flow but use high pressure.

      They cost significantly more, and don't perform better, it only seems like they do, but their real purpose is to reduce maintenance costs and increase security.

      Not a factor at home usage for most people. If you want a better flushing toilet, other materials are fine.

      How about the freedom to make responsible choices on your own?

      Balanced by the test of the choices you make impinging on others.

      Don't get me wrong, I know about the tragedy of the commons - that's how we got here in the first place. However, at some point - enough is enough. I could be an ass and use an old showerhead. I could take the low-flow valve out of one. I don't. I live with it but I'd really like a nice one - and I've looked pretty hard and not found one. So, if you're actually wanting to help, hook a guy up, will ya?

      You'll note that we don't actually send people out to inspect your showerheads, even measuring your water usage is limited to select places under a current crisis (and even that has had some problems, but that's another discussion), but if you want a showerhead that satisfies you, I suggest consulting with somebody knowledgeable in the field. I personally prefer my Rainfall showerhead, it's under 30 bucks, but damn if I know what you want. I do know I sent somebody to buy me that specific showerhead, who I shall not identify, to the store, they came back with a showhead head that the store salesman said was good, because of some stupid reason, but I had to take it back because it simply was not going to make me happy. So we had two trips to make, instead of one.

      Ah, following instructions, that's hard for certain people. If you wanted to get your own showerhead, get your own shower.

    58. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Oh no, those institutional toilets do seem to work better. You could fill it full of sludge and get it to go down in one press. They sound like a small jet and go down with so much force that they appear to create somewhat of a vacuum if the prison documentaries are to be believed. They are every bit as awesome as they sound.

      They *could* leave the rights up to the State. I can assure you that the vast majority of New England isn't going to run out of water any time soon. If they're low on water then the rest of the country is dead from thirst.

      I want a showerhead that has the pressure of a fire hose. I want it to deform my skin and peel off the two outermost layers. I want the elderly and children to be afraid of it - by sound alone. I want it hot, too. However, I was able to achieve that. It is plenty hot. I am not sure how many heads I've tried now but it's probably more than is healthy.

      I have so much pressure that, literally, I have to have a pump house that doesn't actually pump but lowers the pressure. If I take the shower head off and turn it on - it's got pressure. (I have considered bathing like this but the stream isn't so very broad.) I'd go take some from the older house that I have on the property but I've learned my lesson with poking at older plumbing. I want the same pressure, and effect, that you you'd expect to find in Marine barracks that had been built in the 1940s.

      Hmm... I wonder if any of my friends know how to make one? I have some odd friends with some odd skills.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    59. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Technician · · Score: 1

      At one time having done apartment complex maintenance, I found the planned obsolescence is in the hardware, not the software. After doing some failure analysis on some dishwashers, it broke down to 3 primary failure items.

      1 the water pump. The pump contains a plastic impeller on a steel shaft. The water seal was on the metal steal shaft. The plastic impeller on the steel shaft would fail when the steel shaft inside the impeller rusted and split the impeller. This resulted in non repairable failure of the entire pump as both the motor and impeller failed.

      2 the drain valve. The drain valve, a solenoid operated valve diverted water between the wash cycle and the drain. Much like the rubber toilet flush valve in the commode, this rubber part broke down with the use of chlorinated city water just the same as the flapper valve in the toilet. Unlike a toilet, this valve, often integrated into the pump volute assy was not consumer replaceable. The failure was not obvious to the consumer as the wash water was lost during the wash cycle leaving dirt deposits on the dishes at the end of the cycle. Dishwashers were replaced thinking a newer model would work better than an older model. In reality the performance declined over the life of the valve.

      3 The fill valve. The fill valve has a strainer that clogs and is relatively easily replaced, but the valve itself often fails when the plastic permeates with water and the magnetic core rusts. This results in the valve failing to open or limiting the motion resulting in only a trickle of water in the fill cycle. This too is seen by the consumer as a failure to properly clean dishes as the timed fill cycle results in too little water for the wash and rinse cycles and is often compounded by the failing drain valve. The consumer knows the dishwasher is running, but doing a poor job driving the desire for a replacement that works better.

      These problems are seen on both electronic and mechanical timer models.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    60. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, those institutional toilets do seem to work better. You could fill it full of sludge and get it to go down in one press. They sound like a small jet and go down with so much force that they appear to create somewhat of a vacuum if the prison documentaries are to be believed. They are every bit as awesome as they sound

      That is because of how they are designed, being metal is not intrinsic to it, the metal choice is for different reasons, and making toilets out of metal has other costs. It adds up. I'm not even sure they use less water to be honest. Because the purpose for those toilets to make that big whoosh? Prevent prisoners from clogging them up, not to save water. If you have that problem at home, there are cheaper options for you.

      But if you want one, for whatever reason, you can get one. You may have to look around a lot for a plumber that will do the job, they are not run of the mill, but you can certainly do it. I doubt you'll find it worth the money in the long run, but it's your house and your wallet, not mine.

      They *could* leave the rights up to the State. I can assure you that the vast majority of New England isn't going to run out of water any time soon. If they're low on water then the rest of the country is dead from thirst.

      Yes, the conditions in New England are different from say, out west. That's why those states have different regulations. But no, they cannot leave it entirely up to the states. Even New England has arguments about water supplies, and even more important, sewage. Check out the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority. They do exist!

      Perhaps not on the Georgia/Alabama/Florida level, or the states along rivers like the Ohio, Mississippi and Tennessee river, or the Western states, but it isn't a non-existent problem. There may even be problems with Canada, I'm not sure about the drainage basins up there to be honest. There may be some issues with Native American tribes as well, a lot of them retain fishing and hunting rights that are impacted by water quality. Which necessarily involves the Federal government.

      Sorry, but it's a national, even international problem.

      I want a showerhead that has the pressure of a fire hose.

      That would be between 100 and 300 PSI, depending. Your average home has less than 60 PSI.

      You'll need custom pipes and most likely a pressure boost. But yeah, I'm sure some plumber would take your money to run a firehose into your shower if you wanted.

      Of course, I know you're being hyperbolic, but I wanted to give you a real picture of what you were thinking.

      I am not sure how many heads I've tried now but it's probably more than is healthy.

      You've likely been wasting your time with a haphazard method then, you really need to go to a person who can figure out what you want, who KNOWS what you can get, and can find them for you. And install them properly.

      You may think you want a firehose, but most likely you want nozzle strength, which means if you've used any of the rainfall heads, you basically wasted your time.

      Unless you actually do find yourself enjoying a rainfall head or something, and only thought you wanted the firehose effect. But actually, your problem is likely that most people prefer the drizzle effect over straight water, so the showerheads are designed with that in mind.

      Of course, your home water pressure may be an issue too, if it comes in too high, that can actually cause some heads to throttle it back down.

      (I have considered bathing like this but the stream isn't so very broad.)

      That's why they have dispersion in shower heads.

      I'd go take some from the older house that I have on the property but I've learned my lesson with poking at older plumbing.

      Good idea, corrosion happens, seals wear out, and all sorts of things go wrong.

    61. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my, you believe it's the environmentalists keeping nuclear plants from being built, because they're so powerful, but strangely they can't seem to do much about coal and oil, huh?

      I wonder if you stop to think about where the real power is. It isn't regulations. It's bean counters.

      Lives don't matter. Not on their balance sheets. Dollars do. Cheap, clean, nuclear power, cheap, clean power of any kind? That would cut their profits.

      So it doesn't happen.

      And you never see it. The best trick the devil ever pulled.

    62. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Manhattan Island was once rural. There is no reason why New York City can't be green again- plant the rooftops, plant the sides of skyscrapers, it'd even reduce the air polution by turning the city into one big carbon sink.

      There is no place that mankind lives, that cannot raise food. You might need to get creative on what you eat- insects, strange vegetables and grains that are adapted to your local climate- but everywhere mankind lives, so can species that mankind can eat.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    63. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the HE soap is designed so it doesn't produce suds. Since the washer spins the clothes at a much higher speed, it gets more of the soapy water out. There's no noticeable soap in my clothes with my HE washer.

      Yes. I accidentally bought the HE version of my usual detergent and used it anyway in my non-HE washing machine. It did just as good of a job as the regular detergent.

      And what is this whining about water heaters? My newer 40 gallon is considerably more efficient than my parents old 50 gallon. I have to take a really hot shower for at least 30 minutes to have any chance of that thing running out of hot water considering how powerful the burner is.

    64. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by xtronics · · Score: 1

      "Oh my, you believe it's the environmentalists keeping nuclear plants from being built, because they're so powerful, but strangely they can't seem to do much about coal and oil, huh?"

      I didn't say anything about environmentalists.

      "Lives don't matter."

      Hope you realize that there are people in coal and oil that don't want nuclear ... but I don't think you realize I understand just how corrupt government is.. (my take it is the DemoPulicans at fault.)

    65. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure in a sane world it would use a reliable sensor that determines when it's clean coupled with other things like higher pressure or other things to be more effective while maintaining reliability.

      Good dishwashers today are far better at getting dishes clean than the old ones you guys are whining about missing. (Maybe the mediocre ones today are worse than the mediocre ones of years gone by. I don't know. I try to avoid buying crappy appliances.)

      The biggest difference between then and now might be the removal of phosphates from detergents, both clothes and dish.
      Half the stuff I have found useful in life has been banned, in addition to phosphate detergents: freon (not for refrigeration purposes, but a great degreaser and nonpolar solvent for cleaning bike chains and things), cadmium plating (superior to chromium in every way), high octane gasoline, unprotected sex, driving 70 mph, fossil hydrocarbons for compact and lightweight energy source, oil based exterior paint for rust inhibition, cheap rent... however as an adult I understand the reasons behind it, accept it and move on, rather than getting all infantile and whiney, embracing denial, and becoming a republican.

    66. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New house? Tankless.

      Existing house? Tankless might not be cost effective for a long long time.
      Running high wattage wire or gas lines is not cheap. And gas will need venting as well.

      And as you found. You need soft water. Also not cheap.

      Add all that up. Tankless is not that great of a deal. yet.

    67. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spill-proof gas cans.

      Ugh.

    68. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you buy these good appliances?

    69. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You can drill out the flow restricter in most low flow shower heads. They are typically right at the attachment point and made of soft metal.

      Put the shower head in a vice to avoid hurting yourself if the bit grabs.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    70. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I'll have to try that when I get home.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    71. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I just want the government to stay the F*** out of my life.

      You don't really want that. You say it to sound cool and tough, but the first thing that would happen if the govt stayed out of your life is the big dog would come take your shit and rape and murder your family.
      So yeah, pretend that anarchy is awesome, but if you want a taste of it, go hang out in Somalia or Afghanistan for a while and get a reality check.

    72. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by samwichse · · Score: 1

      My wife and I don't ever pre-rinse, leave the dishes sitting in there up to a week before we run the machine. Cheapo Kenmore with the smallest number of buttons.

      Throw in a packet of soap. Runs on "medium" cycle. They always come out spotless.

      What are people on here eating???

    73. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plumber told me the boiler will scale quickly if the water is hard and that my county requires a softener system be installed with these units. When you consider how fast the water passes through and the temp change that occurs they have to be heating the water pretty quickly.

    74. Re:The regulations have destryed Dishwashers by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The research I did indicated that you could see particulates in hot water from the scale that is pumped out. Perhaps the required softeners are for safety. Hot water with the scale precipitated into the water, rather than dissolved, could cause health/safety issues. But I didn't think it would do any damage (or wear) to the heater, it moves the water out too fast for it do stay around and cause problems, like it does in the tank heaters.

  11. Code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The simplest cheapest dishwashers doesn't use 'code'. They use a simpler electromechanical system called 'clockwork', that turn various switches on and off as time goes by. These switches control the pumps and valves that makes the dishwasher work,

    1. Re:Code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mechanical clockworks haven't been used in household appliances for decades. They are more expensive and less reliable.

    2. Re:Code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, cheap mechanical timers with breakable plastic gears and rusting shafts, contact points that physically wear out, and crappy little motors to run them and burn out.

      They're garbage. Always have been.

  12. Three wash cycles? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    What are they? I've owned several dishwashers in my life I've only ever used one type of cycle on each of them, standard.

    What are you doing that requires you to put more thought into washing dishes than loading them and hitting the start button? This sounds like a simple case of more != better, unless you're in marketing and like selling shit with more features.

    1. Re:Three wash cycles? by lucm · · Score: 2

      There's the sanitize mode. I use it all the time (great for cutting boards) except when I have plastic jugs to clean, it destroys them.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Three wash cycles? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Is that a higher temperature?

    3. Re:Three wash cycles? by lucm · · Score: 1

      Yes. Typical cycle would clean at 150F with a peak at 167F in the final stage. In the sanitize mode, it goes up to 180F or even 185F.

      In my experience, most "dishwasher proof" plastic like tupperware are okay with the sanitize temperature, but cheap stuff like no-brand plastic jugs or cups come out bent out of shape.

      Good thing with sanitize mode is that it does a good job with plastic cutting boards. Most people think that plastic cutting boards are better than wood, but it's true only if the board isn't scratched. It's more difficult to effectively sanitize a scratched plastic cutting board than a wood one.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    4. Re:Three wash cycles? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Ahhh right. I don't put cutting boards in the dishwasher because they don't fit, so that's where my ignorance came from.

    5. Re:Three wash cycles? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      What are they? I've owned several dishwashers in my life I've only ever used one type of cycle on each of them, standard.

      What are you doing that requires you to put more thought into washing dishes than loading them and hitting the start button? This sounds like a simple case of more != better, unless you're in marketing and like selling shit with more features.

      mine have always had
      1 rinse and hold
      2 pots and pans
      3 normal
      4 either light loads or delicate china/glassware

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  13. if you're making such a request by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You could post the model of dishwasher. Or better, use the online repair manuals to expose the controller and read & report what model SOC it uses and what support chips. c'mon!

    1. Re:if you're making such a request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Or better, use the online repair manuals to expose the controller

      In my experience online repair manuals for home appliances are usually paywalled. Total bullshit.

    2. Re:if you're making such a request by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I've used this site: http://www.repairclinic.com/

      Step by step on diagnosis and repair.....even I (not highly mechanical) could follow. Plus, their prices are very competitive and other than parts that I needed "immediately", I have no issue paying a little more considering the detailed info they provided.

    3. Re:if you're making such a request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put in the model number for one of my minisplits (LAN120HYV) and it returned a bunch of parts for sale but no sign of any manuals.

    4. Re:if you're making such a request by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I guess I've been lucky in that my appliances were covered. For example, looking at this part: http://www.repairclinic.com/Pa...

      The videos show how to replace the part and also how to check the part to see if it's good or not. It still takes a little bit of work figuring out which parts you need to check, but the videos are very detailed. I usually start with a search for my symptoms and read forum posts saying what to check. Then I use these videos to figure out how to check them.

    5. Re:if you're making such a request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But still no actual manual, right?

      That other stuff is great, but I'm really looking for service manuals in general. They ought to be widely available but the manufacturers appear to be protecting the "authorized repairman" industry by keeping the service manuals private.

  14. Avoid Kickstarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd probably support a Kickstarter project that adds nice wireless notifications to my oven, clothes washer, and dishwasher.

    I would avoid doing anything that might draw the attention of Sears (or other corporations) as they would doubtless try and sue you for attempting to circumvent a profit protect... umm, I mean of course a copyright protection device.

  15. OTP by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't at all be surprised if the microcontroller used in such an appliance is one-time programmable only, or is mask-programmed (do they still do that?) during manufacture of the microcontroller itself, considering the huge quantities an appliance manufacturer would buy them in, so there wouldn't be any 'reprogramming' of it. Even if it's flash-based and you could reprogram it, I also wouldn't be surprised if it's got a read protect fuse blown on it, to protect their code from being copied, and you'd need the original code to decompile and use as a template for anything else you might want it to do. Even then, what's the chance that the microcontroller in question would even have sufficient free space for any significant amounts of code to be added to it? Honestly, after all the trouble you'd go to, and with the risk of completely screwing up your dishwasher, you might want to consider just getting a better one if you're not happy with what you have now, unless you really do have that much free time on your hands and nothing better to do.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re: OTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that's the right attitude and the way things get better

  16. try this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://inhabitat.com/hand-powered-circo-independent-dishwasher-saves-time-space-money-and-water/

  17. Re: Try using alcohol by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had the same problem, so I switched to isopropyl alcohol.

    WORKS GRATE

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  18. NFC tags instead of wireless, easier, more useful by RJFerret · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Near field communication tags, instead of wireless, since all these things listed complete based on time, I just set the tag to start a timer on my device. When it's done, ding!

    Boil a pot of water for cooking? 8 minutes. Preheat the oven? Ditto. Cycle of laundry (both drier and washer complete and ready for unloading), 50 minutes.

    The other benefit of this method is being able to see how much is remaining for planning, rather than waiting for a wireless update to know what's going on, and lacking info in the meantime.

    NFC tags are also useful for other stuff, "nap" tag stuck to the side of my bed turns off certain phone sounds, sets a 25 min. timer and disables auto-rotation of the screen.

    NFC tag on dash the car, disables wireless, enables dashcam (and/or nav software), enables autorotation of the screen.

    The NFC stickers cost pennies per, so you end up buying at least a dozen and putting them to various uses.

  19. Why? by ledow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Stop fucking with electrical devices that control mains water inlet into your house.

    Seriously.

    And I echo all the "one setting" / "won't happen" posts here. You probably can't (often there's a microcontroller but pissing about with them nowadays is almost impossible. Even simple PIC chips can be made "write-once" very easily and often are. The whole ELM327 clone market came about because of one chip not protecting it's code and it no doubt destroyed profits overnight.

    Even if you DO get a firmware from it, reverse-engineering it is a lot of pissing about. Even if you get a replacement firmware / modifiable firmware / emulated board back into the device, what do you think it's going to be able to do? Activate pump. Deactivate pump. Activate heater. Deactivate heater. Open valve. Close valve. That's about it. You might be able to play with timings and temperatures but more likely you'll have several months of flooding your kitchen, blowing the fuses and/or setting the place on fire by running over-spec.

    And what could you gain? Very, very, very slightly cleaner dishes. Possibly.

    There's a reason that the washing machine market is nearly 100 years old, and yet in all the time that it's been electrical (I remember large rotary electromechanical switches on a washing machine, etc.) or electronic, nobody really bothers to make "clone" spare parts for those things. They rarely go wrong (the pumps themselves? That's another matter). Rarely can be tinkered with in any significant way. Rarely would be worth the time, effort and liability to play with.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hacking the electromechanical to keep them working is pretty nice.
      Thanks Miele for including a paper copy of the schematic and program/logic list inside the timer assembly.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you are a big pussy doesn't mean others shouldn't try.

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why ? you ask why ? here ? and you have a 6 digit id ? seriously ? I hope that is the Christmas alcohol speaking ..

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what could you gain...

      Well a range of knowledge of electronics, process control, reverse engineering. Knowledge of how the devices in your home work. The ability to repair said machines when the break or at least know if your being over charged when someone else does.

      Some might object to profits made through drm/protection/obfuscation and some might to add a web server because, well, it only costs $1.78 delivered from china.

      If the dishes where to end up not noticable worse than before it would still be worth it. Or you could just watch some .... got talent show, again.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine has failed and been repaired three times (so far). Had a problem with the water intake valve, which sprung a leak. (Cheap parts). Bad dishwasher detergent clogged the system, causing intake water to spill out through an air vent. (Needed to be cleaned out, and switched to different detergent with water softeners.) Lastly, the seal around the dishwasher door failed and started leaking. Trivial to replace, just needed to order the parts. There's a number of sites online that help you discover how these things have failed, order the parts, and fix them. Youtube videos help too.

    6. Re:Why? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The whole ELM327 clone market came about because of one chip not protecting it's code and it no doubt destroyed profits overnight.

      And not a single tear was shed for those poor poor car execs selling diagnostic equipment with a 1000% markup on the cost.

      The rest of your post is spot on.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding washing machine (not dishwasher) I really see some gain. In our house we have a boiler that heated with firewood.
      I have been thinking about aquiring a more proffessional washing machine. A machinge that could be tinkered with to allow also hot water into the machine since the hot water from the tap is much cheaper than using electricity to heat it all the way from the temperature in the cold water tap.
      The issue of water damage is not a big problem in our case since the machine is in an old cellar with concrete floor and a drain next to it.

      The reason for getting a more proffessional machine is that they should last longer than the consumer variant.

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, look, somebody else who didn't read the Arduino dishwasher article.

      Not only can you do it, it's not even all that hard to do.

      Sure, if you're the sort of guy who doesn't like to tinker with anything, you might not want to - but then why the fuck are you on Slashdot?

      Most of us are quite capable of tinkering with water and electricity.

  20. Dishwashers are for lackadaisicals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I ripped mine out because it wastes water, electricity, and is noisy. Do the dishes the old fashioned way.

    1. Re:Dishwashers are for lackadaisicals... by ickleberry · · Score: 2

      Y'should place the dishes outside and blast them with a V8-powered pressure washer, the Real American(TM) Freedum loving way

    2. Re:Dishwashers are for lackadaisicals... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      That's how they do it in Oklahoma, one presumes ?

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    3. Re:Dishwashers are for lackadaisicals... by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      I ripped mine out because it wastes water, electricity, and is noisy. Do the dishes the old fashioned way.

      Real men don't use dishes. or pots. or silverware.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  21. just add the missing buttone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I admit I have not tried this with a dishwasher. But on other devices, I found that the existing buttons were wired in a grid matrix something like a phone keypad or computer keyboard. What I mean is you have several horizontal and several vertical wires (schematic speaking, they might go anywhere in the actual pc board). Each button connects one horizontal and one vertical wire. You will likely find combinations that don't have buttons. Add a button and see what it does. I have done this on car radios and home CD players and the like.

    1. Re:just add the missing buttone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do that on a PLL chipped CB radio, it gave me about 20 more channels. You have to use a freq counter to see what channel you're on, and illegal as hell, but it's a well known hack for CQDX'rs.

  22. Fully capable "budget" models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Way back in 1975, I started as a technical trainee at the Nevada State Highway Department. They had just recently purchased a bunch of Compucorp (?) electronic calculators, some of which were programmable. The visible difference was a slide button on the top of the keyboard that could be set to "program", which meant memorize the series of keys being pressed, and "run" which would execute your "program". I found that if I carefully pulled back the metallic faceplate on the non-programmable models, the "program" key was still there and could be easily manipulated with a pencil. Using an X-acto knife, I modified all the non-programmable models by cutting out a hole in the faceplate that almost looked factory. Not sure what this has to do with washing dishes, but thought I'd share.

  23. Not sure i/we understand the question correctly by orogorhotmail.com · · Score: 1

    To define a cycle :
    This would be a program with 3 different cycles:

    (rough clean) Fill a quarter of tank, Spin left 50rpm, spin right 50rpm, empty tank
    (clean) Fill a eighth of tank Spin left 50rpm, spin right 50rpm, Spin left 100rpm, spin right 100rpm, empty tank
    (rince) Spin left 200rpm, spin right 200rpm, empty tank, Spin left 200rpm, spin right 200rpm, empty tank

    Maybe he wants more programs?

  24. Washing Machine hacks? by calidoscope · · Score: 2

    One hack I'd really like to do is a warm rinse cycle on a washing machine. A 15C increase in water temperature can make a big difference in rinsing effectiveness. My first washing machine did have a warm rinse cycle, but the US Govt, in their infinite wisdom, decided to require washing machines to only use cold water for rinse.

    --
    A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    1. Re:Washing Machine hacks? by lucm · · Score: 1

      Can't you cheat by switching the hoses?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Washing Machine hacks? by AaronW · · Score: 1

      My washing machine will happily use warm water or even hot for rinse and it's pretty new.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    3. Re:Washing Machine hacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe but if your dishwasher warms your water it will use a lot more electricity warming the cold water instead of the warm.

    4. Re:Washing Machine hacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sani-rinse? It's an option on some models, rinses with temps hot enough to kill bugs. Watch out for some plastics...

    5. Re:Washing Machine hacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, if it has two hoses, connect both to the hot water. If it has a built-in heater, it will still work happily, since it has a thermostat.

    6. Re:Washing Machine hacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine too, though the default is cold.

    7. Re:Washing Machine hacks? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Cold rinse sets the fibers on synthetic fabrics. If you warm rinse some synthetics,the fibers may sit in their unset phase too long as they sit in the washer waiting for you to dry them and it becomes the new "set" phase causing the clothing to be stretched. The dryer cool-down stage is for the same purpose.

    8. Re:Washing Machine hacks? by frooddude · · Score: 1

      Really? Although it's a 2 step process, the 'Quick Rinse' cycle on my dish washer uses hot water. Then I can pull out the reticent dishes and give them a physical scrub down with a brush, stick them back in, load the soap and run the official wash cycle.

      Hot water all around. Of course, perhaps it's the fact that my hot water feed is responsive and it's the only pipe hooked to the dishwasher?

  25. Oh this one's easy by Masked+Coward · · Score: 1

    If you haven't already done so, install the latest version of Wife Software. Make sure it's backward-compatible.

    1. Re:Oh this one's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't already done so, install the latest version of Wife Software. Make sure it's backward-compatible.

      Don't forget to install a "back door"

    2. Re:Oh this one's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP is gonna have a hard time keeping that running stable, he keeps losing his 3.5" floppy.

      Err... I'll pretend this wasn't me and post this as AC and then go bug people in the real world. I've been antisocial enough.

  26. WIFI washing machine self-destruction by lkcl · · Score: 1

    hahaaaa! the only reason i would want washing machines to be WIFI-enabled would be to hack them in order to see this sort of thing happen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... - the only problem being of course that if [by-default] insecure IoT enabled washing machines really DID end up like this, it would be totally and utterly unsafe. kids or animals in the same room as tens of thousands of washing machines all spinning at 5,000 RPM under remote-DDOS-mass-hacked-computer-control... generally bad and unfavourable en-masse outcome. still, sadly, i can genuinely foresee something like this actually happening. with resultant lawsuits, company directors being imprisoned for mass-murder, and, finally, then and ONLY then would laws be put in place which make it a criminal offense to not properly secure IoT devices. the sad thing is that we as tech-savvy people damn well know RIGHT NOW that such laws are critical and necessary, but that law-makers are flat-out ignorant of the dangers.

    1. Re:WIFI washing machine self-destruction by sjames · · Score: 1

      Imagine the security footage from a laundromat on that day.

  27. GE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GE products allow for this some modifications: https://firstbuild.com/greenbean/

    I bought a top of the line GE appliance, after trying out a Kitchenaid and Bosch. I thought I would have to hack the GE to make it do what I want (clean my dishes), because the other models didn't do it properly. Turns out the GE is far superior in build quality and wash quality. I didn't need to hack it at all, and it's works great. Maybe one day I'll play around with it, but at this point I don't need to.

  28. wanna bet by bferrell · · Score: 1

    it's motors and cams?

  29. Buy an old dishwasher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    New dishwashers' regular cycles are now 3-4 hours. Yes, you heard right. That's because dishwasher cycles are now regulated from Washington, DC. You see, the theory is that if you use less water you will save the earth from complete catastrophe. Just as it is illegal to bypass pollution-control devices in your Washington, D.C.-mandated car, it is entirely likely that it is illegal to bypass world-saving firmware in your dishwasher, even without DRM or DMCA.

    The best solution is to just buy a used dishwasher from before about the year 2006. Even better, buy one that is completely electromechanical, and just install your own controls, for example, toggle switches.

    1. Re:Buy an old dishwasher by gweihir · · Score: 1

      And get old seals in the bargain for a much reduced remaining lifetime! Seriously, this is terrible advice.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  30. Arduino Dishwasher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.neonsquirt.com/dishwasher.html

    1. Re:Arduino Dishwasher by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      Addendum:

      http://www.neonsquirt.com/dish... is one of the top results for "arduino dishwasher" and it has almost everything, the code included.

    2. Re:Arduino Dishwasher by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      "It works fine, but only has 3 different wash cycles."

      2 more than most people use.

      Google has about 79,200 hits for "arduino dishwasher" , I guess you checked those?

      kosher dishwasher, 3 cycles; meat, milk, and parve.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  31. Arduino dishwasher hack by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
  32. $3 to replace the MCU with a new one by raymorris · · Score: 2

    You're not wrong. On the other hand, it'd cost about $3 to replace the microcontroller with a new one. One flashed with the Arduino bootloader would be simple to use. (You don't need the whole Arduino board) .

    1. Re:$3 to replace the MCU with a new one by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Sure, again, if you want to go to that much trouble (you'd have to do some blue-wiring because the chance of it being a COTS microcontroller and not an OEM version is a factor to consider), but you'd still want access to the original microcontrollers' code as a blueprint. Newer dishwashers are far from old-style units that just had an electromechanical timer-sequencer operating them, they've got temperature, conductivity, and turbidity sensors built into them, to make them as water-efficient as possible while still getting the dishes clean. Without the original code to analyze you'd have to start at square one. I think the OP just wants to add a feature or two, not do an entire development project.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  33. Cooking, genius... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may come as a shock to you, but some people prepare food at home, that requires the use of an actual oven, or for that matter, even a stove. Make, say, potatoes au graten and you're TOTALLY SCREWED with the cheapest dishwasher and cheapest detergent, unless you want to run it through 5 times in a row.

    The TSP not only helps initially remove the food from dishes, it also helps keep it from re-depositing back onto them from the water.

    Whatever the newer Cascade gelpacks used to replace Phosphates while still being able to clean decently apparently also completely destroys anything made from aluminum. It turns totally black and makes anything it touches black too.

    I bought two full cases of the old classic Cascade Processional Line with phosphates before it completely disappeared from the market (and got replaced by the phosphate free stuff). It cleans REALLY well compared to most everything else I've tried.
    Once that's gone I guess I'll have to go with those Finish powerball tabs (the regular, not the orange or lemon). Those are about the best compromise I've found between getting stuff pretty clean without destroying pans, that you can still buy at any normal store.

    1. Re:Cooking, genius... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      potatoes au graten

      Ouch, that mangling really made my head hurt and I'm not even French.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Cooking, genius... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Have you people never heard of soaking things? Time and water heals all wounds - or at least makes cleaning dishes dead easy.

      I realise dishwashers are a lazy device, I get that, I wish I had one - but if you want it done right, soak the ass nasty dishes properly before hand or,... shock horror,................... rinse them right after using them! No nee d to even soak then

    3. Re:Cooking, genius... by hey! · · Score: 1

      It's also a pain dealing with trash accumulating in the front seat of your car, but that doesn't make it OK to throw it out the window.

      If Finish powerballs work for you, then you should use them; phosphates were banned for a good reason (in most places). If you have problem with spotting then use a rinse aid; I make a cheap homemade rinse aid using food grade citric acid, which I buy in bulk for other uses; it's very handy as a household cleaner and can be used as "sour salt" to give food recipes like sourdough bread an extra kick. A citric acid solution is way cheaper than store bought rinse aid; white vinegar is even cheaper, although citric acid works better IMO.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Cooking, genius... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The only thing that comes as a shock to me is that you manage to fit your oven, oven trays or even a stove into the dishwasher.

      I LOVE cooking. I intend to spend a good 2 hours in the kitchen tonight preparing what will likely be a 3 course meal. Last night's meal ended up with thick layers of Gouda deposited on plates. They are all clean now thanks to the awesome washing properties of the cheapest supermarket brand washing powder I could find.

      I see your claims all the time for a lot of things. The removal of phosphates means we can't clean our dishes. The removal of phosphates means we can't clean our bodies. Heck even CLR a product which was once mostly just phosphoric acid is now phosphate free and still does a fantastic job at removing calcium lime and rust. All the claims that you can't do something without phosphoric acid are completely unsubstantiated, and most of the western world does not have even the slightest problem keeping their kitchen clean. ...

      Except for my girlfriend's kitchen, but phosphates won't solve that problem.

    5. Re:Cooking, genius... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finish Powerball tabs contain phosphates.

    6. Re:Cooking, genius... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Not needed. My budget washer (not bottom, but certainly not top) will handle burnt potatoes au gratin without soaking. Just don't run it on the short cycle. Doesn't matter if you wash same day of 6 weeks later. Scrape and wash, no soaking, no pre-cleaning.

    7. Re:Cooking, genius... by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      phosphates were banned for a good reason (in most places)

      Yeah, a box of old laundry detergent into a bucket of gasoline, and you had a good napalm. That's why it was banned. The environmental reasons made better TV, but the real reason phosphates were banned was that they were easy access to bomb making material. That's why the bomb makers moved to industrial fertilizer. The large amount of phosphates weren't banned there, but were more registered and tracked. The small amount for domestic cleaning was a drop in the bucket compared to the industrial uses.

    8. Re:Cooking, genius... by bmo · · Score: 1

      Napalm is an incendiary, not an explosive, i.e., not a bomb.

      Fuel-fertilizer bombs /are/ explosives, however. They do indeed go "boom". I first learned about these from an online friend in Appalachia who related the story that among his friends, one of the things to "do" for fun was to make one, drive into a disused mine, drop it off, and let it go boom. This was years /before/ the Oklahoma City bombing. Yee-haw.

      Mix Styrofoam and gasoline (as much as you can dissolve), however, and you do get a sticky burning substance - good enough for most campfire lighting purposes (summer-camp way - a can of spray wax and a match) or self-immolation (someone actually did this in Wakefield RI, for really stupid reasons). Add elemental phosphorous for extra fun.

      One of Fieser's colleagues suggested adding phosphorus to the mix which increased the "ability to penetrate deeply...into the musculature, where it would continue to burn day after day."[5]

      "Napalm sticks to kids"

      I cannot find any chemistry (from something /not/ related to the Anarchist's Cookbook or some-such Darwin-event inducing text) related to easily making a bomb out of TSP, so unless you have a reliable reference for your just-so-story, I have to call [citation needed] on this.

      --
      BMO

    9. Re:Cooking, genius... by hey! · · Score: 2

      If that narrative were true you wouldn't be able to by phosphates in other forms, such as TSP for degreasing your walls before wallpapering. That's a much more useful and concentrated source of phosphate than dishwashing liquid for your home bomb-maker.

      No, phosphates were banned in dishwashing detergents because their widespread daily use put so much phosphate into the phosphorous-limited riparian ecosystems. People don't use nearly as much phosphate washing their walls or decks.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  34. Ask Tim Allen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tim Allen did an episode of "Home Improvement" where he upgraded a dishwasher. Or you could just download the episode for pointers.

    As for me, my new dishwasher is just electro-mechanical relays.

  35. Could be done by Cedillas · · Score: 1

    I have owned an appliance repair business for a while now. There are a number of common cases. Some controllers have a plug to dip switches that set the model that the board is installed in. In this case the board can be used across a range of products. All of the products will be of the same type, all dish washers, cloths washers, dryers, etc.. GE fridge & cloths washer controllers are a good example of this. Then there are controllers that share the same PCB but only have the parts populated for the model that it is intended for. You see this a lot in wall mounted ovens. The controller in a single oven unit has only half the parts compared to one for a double oven. Of course there is case where the controller is built with a single purpose in mind. I worked in IT for many years and retired at an early age. I would see no reason why an Arduino or PI could be easily used in place of. A modular unit could be built to plug in the proper relays and input devises. Most of the manufactures controllers are large so it wold be possible to substitute in the current space. If I were going to start an appliance manufacturing business, I would definitely look at doing something more uniform across models and products.

  36. Similar Hack - Had to google a I couldn't remember by penguin_zoo · · Score: 1

    xxx: OK, so, our build engineer has left for another company. The dude was literally living inside the terminal. You know, that type of a guy who loves Vim, creates diagrams in Dot and writes wiki-posts in Markdown... If something - anything - requires more than 90 seconds of his time, he writes a script to automate that. xxx: So we're sitting here, looking through his, uhm, "legacy" xxx: You're gonna love this xxx: smack-my-bitch-up.sh - sends a text message "late at work" to his wife (apparently). Automatically picks reasons from an array of strings, randomly. Runs inside a cron-job. The job fires if there are active SSH-sessions on the server after 9pm with his login. xxx: kumar-asshole.sh - scans the inbox for emails from "Kumar" (a DBA at our clients). Looks for keywords like "help", "trouble", "sorry" etc. If keywords are found - the script SSHes into the clients server and rolls back the staging database to the latest backup. Then sends a reply "no worries mate, be careful next time". xxx: hangover.sh - another cron-job that is set to specific dates. Sends automated emails like "not feeling well/gonna work from home" etc. Adds a random "reason" from another predefined array of strings. Fires if there are no interactive sessions on the server at 8:45am. xxx: (and the oscar goes to) fucking-coffee.sh - this one waits exactly 17 seconds (!), then opens a telnet session to our coffee-machine (we had no frikin idea the coffee machine is on the network, runs linux and has a TCP socket up and running) and sends something like sys brew. Turns out this thing starts brewing a mid-sized half-caf latte and waits another 24 (!) seconds before pouring it into a cup. The timing is exactly how long it takes to walk to the machine from the dudes desk. xxx: holy sh*t I'm keeping those Original: http://bash.im/quote/436725 (in Russian)

  37. Re:Try using alcohol by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Nothing will cut through the greasey grimey shleck baked onto my oven.

    Not toxic oven cleaner, not Brillo pads, not the self-cleaning feature (which uses exceptionally high temps to turn shit straight to ash). Anything that removes it only does so by removing the underlying steel and enamel of the oven itself.

  38. Re:Hack by sexconker · · Score: 2

    Please stop with y our microaggressions.
    Womanual Cycle, please.

  39. Kill yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it now, you good-for-nothing shitboy. Rid the world of your pestilent presence.

  40. Re:Try using alcohol by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Have you tried thermite?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  41. No, it's not worth it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Unless your time is worthless to you, you'll spend more time screwing with it and derive little, if any benefit.

    Just go get a new one. We replaced a 17-year old Kenmore, and I was pleasantly surprised to find that new dishwashers are super quiet and have more cycles than we could possibly make use of (kind of silly, really).

    They use less energy, but often they don't clean as well with lower-temp hot water. It's a trade off. We replaced our water heater recently and get much hotter water at a lower cost, so we can crank up the incoming water temp a bit and it cleans just fine.

    It also makes a world of difference with the new ones how you position the plates and bowls. Older dishwashers had bigger motors and so it didn't matter so much how stuff was placed inside, everything got blasted clean no matter what.

    But with the lame-ass Energy Star bullshit all the motors and pumps they use now are smaller, so they just don't do as good a job. Just take an extra minute to make sure that the plates and bowls and stuff aren't blocking each other. Once you do that it'll be fine.

    The new ones are as quiet as can be, though- if not for the lights we could barely tell ours is on and washing. And as long as the water is hot enough it'll clean everything just fine.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  42. How about the Audi Navigation System... by BUL2294 · · Score: 0

    Are there any decent hacks--or better yet, replacement firmwares / jailbreaking techniques out there for the Audi Navigation System (RNS-E)? This is Audi's system, used in 2005-2010 models, so I doubt there's any real encryption or security measures to prevent that...

    Hopefully, there's some way to set it up for Bluetooth streaming...

    --
    Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
  43. Re:Similar Hack - Had to google a I couldn't remem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and for those of us who like things at least somewhat formatted:

    xxx: OK, so, our build engineer has left for another company. The dude was literally living inside the terminal. You know, that type of a guy who loves Vim, creates diagrams in Dot and writes wiki-posts in Markdown... If something - anything - requires more than 90 seconds of his time, he writes a script to automate that.
    xxx: So we're sitting here, looking through his, uhm, "legacy"
    xxx: You're gonna love this
    xxx: smack-my-bitch-up.sh - sends a text message "late at work" to his wife (apparently). Automatically picks reasons from an array of strings, randomly. Runs inside a cron-job. The job fires if there are active SSH-sessions on the server after 9pm with his login.
    xxx: kumar-asshole.sh - scans the inbox for emails from "Kumar" (a DBA at our clients). Looks for keywords like "help", "trouble", "sorry" etc. If keywords are found - the script SSHes into the clients server and rolls back the staging database to the latest backup. Then sends a reply "no worries mate, be careful next time".
    xxx: hangover.sh - another cron-job that is set to specific dates. Sends automated emails like "not feeling well/gonna work from home" etc. Adds a random "reason" from another predefined array of strings. Fires if there are no interactive sessions on the server at 8:45am.
    xxx: (and the oscar goes to) fucking-coffee.sh - this one waits exactly 17 seconds (!), then opens a telnet session to our coffee-machine (we had no frikin idea the coffee machine is on the network, runs linux and has a TCP socket up and running) and sends something like sys brew. Turns out this thing starts brewing a mid-sized half-caf latte and waits another 24 (!) seconds before pouring it into a cup. The timing is exactly how long it takes to walk to the machine from the dudes desk.
    xxx: holy sh*t I'm keeping those

    Original: http://bash.im/quote/436725 (in Russian)

  44. CD player by feufeu · · Score: 1

    When I finally decided I had enough CDs to warrant my own player (borrowed my parent's one up to that point all the time), I afforded the cheapest one that could be found in the local store. I realized fairly quickly that it really did lack one thing: the screen for track number etc. was just LCD, no backlight. I pulled the reflective foil on the back, put some white plastic for scattering the light and two LEDs behind it and that was it.

    While doing the above hack I realized that the inputs from the buttons for play, stop, skipping tracks etc. were connected in a matrix that had quite a few unused interconnects... It turned out that some of them did trigger undocumented functions like fast forward, repeat from A to B and the like. I wired buttons for those functions and - well - never used them.

    As for dishwashers and the like: buy the best quality stuff for a resonable price in decent used condition and never worry again. Mine was 10 years old at the time and I it's still happily chugging away 15 years later !

  45. Re: Try using alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chisel and hammer can scrape it off

  46. Appliance Notifications. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Clothes Washer, Dryer and Dish washer all notify me and my wife when the cycle is completed.. all it took was some smart switches that monitor power consumption (Z-Wave).. Will work with fine with any 120v appliance.

    When power goes over 20W it flags the device as on, if the appliance flagged as running and goes for longer than 5mins using less than 4w of power, its then decided the cycle has completed and a notification is triggered.. thats basically it.

    I even scripted up a flood sensor in basement, so if my sewer pipe clogs the Dish and Clothes washers will shutdown so they dont contribute to any additional flooding.

  47. Re:Try using alcohol by rfengr · · Score: 1

    Cleaning it would only destroy the taste of the food. It's well seasoned, like Al Bundy's BBQ.

  48. Mainframe compuers. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    (I have personal experience with one brand, from the vendor side, as of the turn of the millennium.)

    It was cheaper to install all the processors and only enable the number that were paid for than to actually have boards with missing CPUs etc.

    The extras doubled as replacements for potential failed devices (with flaked-out devices disabled and their replacement enabled and configured to appear to be the failed unit) unless/until more were paid for and activated. Then it ran with fewer spares (and thus a higher probability of eventually requiring a board swap or device replacement in the field - which, in mainframe applications, can be a major disaster.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Mainframe compuers. by jrrnetflix · · Score: 1

      When I was in engineering school we got a SDS minicomputer. At one point we wanted to buy some extra I/O ports. So after paying the appropriate sum (I want to say it was around $5K), we were given instructions on how to move a jumper wire.

  49. It's all relatively easy by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Dishwashers (or other large utilities) are actually quite simple machines.

    There is usually a pump, one or more heating elements (most likely on a (solid-state) relay or thyristor), a motor (again on a relay or thyristor), a few buttons, small relays/low power circuits and switches (such as 'door closed', 'child lock', 'start/stop', 'cycle select', 'water basin full', 'water basin empty') and perhaps a few sensors (temperature and humidity would be my guess but I'm deducing from my own dishwasher that those are just on a timer).

    All of those are relatively simple to run on any type of electronic board. Most likely the circuit board(s) just runs a few wires to each of the components and you can figure each of them out based on a repair manual and/or testing them out with some simple gear (a cheap scope, an analyzer (in case you get a fancy digital (I2C) sensor or LCD display) and a few multimeters should get you there). You could replace the entire circuit board with an Arduino-like device. You then simply have to figure out what you want each sensor and switch to do (and figure out all the possible failure scenarios). I doubt many machines still use hardwired failsafes (eg. cut the water flow if the basin is full without going through the chip) so you may flood your kitchen a few times before you figure out all the details - using timers to measure things would be a 'really bad idea' but it seems to me some designs do use that method (my dishwasher runs the pump on empty for what seems to be a very long time)

    Modifying the chip will be harder, they're typically proprietary and custom chips, you could get very lucky to find a JTAG interface but most likely it's all soldered and glued/epoxied in (especially with 'wet' appliances). You'd be better off starting with another appliance. I found an old cheap clothes dryer to be the most simple of all (a 'program' switch which was really a divider for the timer speed and a multi-switch - each setting would just turn on/off one of the 2 heating elements and add a different resistor to the temp sensor), a timer (one that goes tick tick tick until it mechanically turns off the entire device), a temperature sensor, 2 heating elements and a motor).

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  50. Re:Try using alcohol by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Ashes of the past for burger of the future!

  51. Other hacks: Garage Door Opener by crow · · Score: 1

    I had a garage door opener that started to have problems. The door is rather heavy, and it jerks a bit as it opens. The opener is a double-speed Genie model. Occasionally it would think something was wrong when opening and stop. Unfortunately, there was no option to turn off the double-speed mode. Of course, they also sold a regular-speed model that was exactly the same except for one change on the circuit board. A little searching turned up the solution: Clip the resistor labeled "double-speed" and it cuts the speed in half.

    Now the door opens more slowly without any jerking, and it never stops half-way up.

    1. Re:Other hacks: Garage Door Opener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I replaced the drive motor in my garage door opener with a Tesla model X motor... It now opens in 0.0003 seconds.

    2. Re:Other hacks: Garage Door Opener by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Bonus: If you have a revolution, you've already got a guillotine.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  52. Re:Similar Hack - Had to google a I couldn't remem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The code for those is up at GitHub. ;-) I just logged out so I'm not logging back in again, damn it. Anyhow, search for one of the script names and add github to the terms and you should be all good to go.

  53. Removed planned obsolescence on my induction-plate by gweihir · · Score: 1

    The thing with induction plates is that the central components (power capacitors, switch, coil) must be high-quality, or the whole thing goes up in smoke very fast. Hence they have inherent long lifetime. Of course, manufacturers do not want that, they want people to buy new stuff, not use old stuff forever. What they do is add artificial weak points. Sometime you can find and fix them, and I did so for a generic induction plate.

    This plate has a 235V rectifier whose leads are pressing against an aluminum heat-sink. The leads are insulated with PVC-tubing that has a limited lifetime, even more so when heated up, which it is here. When it gets brittle, it stops insulating well, shortening out and blowing the non-replaceable fuse and likely other components. My fix was to saw out the piece of the heat sink that they pressed against. It should also work to replace the tubing with silicone-glass-cloth insulation tubing that has a very long lifetime. While the circuit has some electrolyte capacitors as well, they were all good quality 105C types and should live a long time. They should also not damage the circuit when they fail and hence can be replaced at need.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  54. Arduino Dishwasher by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "It works fine, but only has 3 different wash cycles."

    2 more than most people use.

    Google has about 79,200 hits for "arduino dishwasher" , I guess you checked those?

  55. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck has become of Slashdot?

  56. Working on that and more already. ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been working in HVAC for a while and have been noticing that I could replace the control boards with small microcontrollers or the like and some simple hardware. I'd been considering using a RasPi but have since found something that I think works far better. I've got to wait till I get a good number of bad boards on several different systems before I can finish the project but so far we're pretty sure that it can be done easily. This will be easily adapted to washing machines, dryers, dishwashers, etc.

  57. Seriously DON'T do it. by F34nor · · Score: 1

    At least not i your home. I have a friend who's a forensic fire investigator and do oyu know the number one thing to burn your house down? Dishwasher. It gets hot, uses a lot of electricity, and is filled with pressurized water. As one who ignore "no user serviceable parts" I took this one to heart.

    1. Re:Seriously DON'T do it. by swb · · Score: 1

      I believe this. I replaced a 10 year old Kenmore Elite and found that the wiring harness for the supply power had obvious signs of burning and arcing, although I had no idea why as there had been no leaks and no loose wires.

    2. Re:Seriously DON'T do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to NFPA (National Fire Protection Association), the number one cause of home fires is cooking equipment, with electric ranges the prevailing culprit.

      The dishwasher is even less likely to start a fire than the refrigerator according to these documents:

      http://www.nfpa.org/research/reports-and-statistics/fire-causes/appliances-and-equipment/cooking-equipment
      http://www.nfpa.org/~/media/files/research/nfpa-reports/appliances-and-equipment/oskitchenequipment.pdf

      Still, there is often a heating element involved that could be a fire source. Hacker beware!

    3. Re:Seriously DON'T do it. by Mirar · · Score: 1

      My old dishwasher got something wrong with the temperature sensor, so it constantly boiled the water (when it was on) up to the point where the built in temperature breaker would kick it off (which was at >100C???!?). It did all this completely by itself without me modding it and usually without any error code (it alarmed about overheat twice during the three months before I noticed that it was actually a permanlent error).

      I somehow feel safer modding things and knowing how they work than to trust engineers to do it correct, these days. I don't blame the engineers though -- someone probably went "but we can save 3c if we don't have this safety feature, remove it, that's an order". Luckily it _was_ still on _my_ dishwasher (the high temperature breaker)...

      Dishwashers are highly servicable anyway -- but you can't user-_service_ the parts. You can however quite easily user-replace the parts.

  58. Re:Try using alcohol by F34nor · · Score: 1

    Sarcasm? Plastic melting heat + alcohol = no more dishwasher, house, kids, dog, and car.

  59. Wireless notification by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    They're called ears. If they're not getting a signal, then the wash cycle has completed.

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
  60. Electric toothbrush battery replacement by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    My Braun had an AA battery with soldering tabs. As the battery fits snugly in its place, it wasn't much work to modify it for regular AA batteries, so now I have cheap replacements. It's also fun to use a non-rechargeable 1.5 volter to overclock it from the usual 1.2 V.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  61. Re: Try using alcohol by F34nor · · Score: 2
  62. Re:Removed planned obsolescence on my induction-pl by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    This plate has a 235V rectifier whose leads are pressing against an aluminum heat-sink.

    I first read this to mean an intentional electrical contact. I once fixed a kettle by soldering contacts that were originally held together by simple pressure, after they had developed oxidation issues.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  63. The fiends! by tlambert · · Score: 3, Funny

    [...] or before you know it they'll be finding a way to put DRM on dishwashers.

    The fiends!

    Dish Rinse Management! How diabolical!

  64. Why use a machine? by jpellino · · Score: 1

    It takes marginally more time to completely wash a dish than it does to rinse it and put it in the machine.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Why use a machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a big ever hungry dog and an energy star rated German dishwasher with sanitize. Takes almost no time to do dishes (they go in clean but with dog slobber) . I'm also lazy and don't have to put clean dishes in the cupboard unless I have company.

    2. Re:Why use a machine? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What do you need the dishwasher for?

      My dog cleans them well enough.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  65. Re:NFC tags instead of wireless, easier, more usef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here, let me fix your life.
    https://www.google.com/search?q=kitchen+timer&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiltbaQ7_rJAhVR8GMKHZvxCq0Q_AUICCgC

    Buy one and use it.

  66. download the repair manuals and see. by swschrad · · Score: 1

    manuals have the cycle sequence in them. they will also usually have pictures of the circuit boards, and always parts list. if the $1200 model by the same OEM (Sears makes nothing, they buy from OEMs and have the items rebranded) has what looks like the same control PCB, but most of the pinouts are not used by the control panel, it might happen.

    waterproofing issues might make it dodgy to try and take the buttons external.

    but you don't think there are going to be 10 different control boards between Sears and the OEM, do you? really? these things stop for two minutes at each install station on the assembly line. they are not going to customize in a production run. and at the parts store, there are many crosses to one box with one control board in it.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  67. test equipment. by swschrad · · Score: 1

    what do you thing all those Option -01 -02 -05 -11 -17 means on that Tektronix or HP scope?

    it's all software tickles. you buy an upgrade while availiable, you just enter a code at a special menu screen.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:test equipment. by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Whoah, not always! You can't "software" your way into a OCXO, for example.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
  68. Dishwasher cabinet by hamanaka9846 · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend washes the dishes by hand and uses the dishwasher for storing dishes since the cabinets are full.

    1. Re:Dishwasher cabinet by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Which is a girlie hack, so to say.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  69. Re:Removed planned obsolescence on my induction-pl by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Well, it is sort-of intentional contact after the PVC tubing has degraded...

    Your example (silver plating, I expect, but tin-plating can also work) is another time-honored way to implement planned obsolescence. Sometimes it backfires. For example WD hat problem with silver-plated contacts in hard-drives in Russia, since they have more sulfur in the air there due to pollution. As a result, the drives failed too early. Of course nobody honest would ever silver-plate PCB contacts. Gold plating is not really much more expensive and far, far superior.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  70. Hacking hardware is nothing new. by Psychofreak · · Score: 2

    I know an old mainframe tech who would "clip a resistor" to "upgrade" a system from one clock speed to a faster speed. This was also in the days when 1K of RAM was a rather sizable card.

    Now if you have a HiTech Flash 4 RC radio, an early computer radio in 72mhz, one can "upgrade" to a Flash 5 by adding a couple switches, and jumping certain pads on the board. The firmware is already loaded.

    Phil

    --
    Laugh, it's good for you!
  71. Car wash by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Maybe its like a car wash where you have the Basic Wash that is programmed to leave all the road salt still sticking to your car up to the That Women Washing a Car in "Cool Hand Luke" level?

    It is all the same wash only if you pay for the higher levels you get more neon lights that flash "drip cycle" and "spray on wax" or "Ooohhh, that gal doesn't know what she is doing . . ." to which Paul Newman snarls "she sure as heck does" and then he has to eat all of those hardboiled eggs to get back the respect of George Kennedy who is the ring leader among the prisoners in the chain gang.

  72. Do you realize that this is a website for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    who like to figure this stuff out for interest and fun?

    No? OK, didn't think so.

  73. Not married, dude? by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Men know that dishwashers sterilize the dishes because the dryer coil does double duty as a "hot water booster" to raise the water temperature to well above the pitiful lukewarm level that regulations allow for the water heater. Even if little flecks of dried food are still stuck to the dishes, those food particles are safe because they have been autoclaved.

    Women, on the other hand, always manage to find those tiny flecks of dried food that are invisible to male visual receptors, and they will rewash every last dish that you carefully loaded into the dishwasher.

    My wife has heard for the 100th time that I once dated the woman responsible for the lukewarm, bacterial-growing output of the water heater by helping draft the legislation meant to prevent kids from getting scalded from the hot water spigot. But dishes get washed by hand anyway.

  74. TSP and the Day of Atonement by Latent+Heat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had this discussion about the "ethics" of using TSP during a dishwasher discussion with my neighbors who attend synagogue and observe the Holy Days. I suggested the TSP thing (haven't tried it yet myself) but warned that this has to be balanced against ones conscience regarding the Environment.

    I was told, "Thanks for the tip and not a problem. We are supposed to write our sins down on a piece of paper on the Day of Atonement, and I can just add this one to the list . . ."

  75. Not in my dishwasher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not in my dishwasher, not in my clothes washer, not in my clothes dryer. My stuff uses control systems, but they use electricity to control the device at hand. There are motors, sensors (thermal or go/no-go microswitches) and heating elements. And that's it. No software. Even the timers are motors that click away on a quarter-second basis. I have an SDR that can capture all of the power/gas smartmeters in a two block radius, but the other appliances only kick out electromagnetic radiation (noise), and don't respond to it in return. You can try to hack them if you want (go ahead, knock yourself out), but apart from attacking the power line that they are attached to, or physically adjusting the controls (they are mechanical, not electric/electronic), I don't think you will get too far.

  76. Unsweetened cocoa powder by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    My wife's favorite beverage is unsweetened cocoa powder stirred into hot milk. It leaves this chocolate residue on all the tea cups that doesn't come off.

    When we first got married, the solution to my wife hand (re-)washing every single cup coming out of the dishwasher was Cascade Complete.

    Or Cascade Complete used to do the job on the cocoa cups, but it stopped doing it, I blamed the dishwasher as getting old, but then I read about the phosphate thing.

    You see, we have really hard water, but I got tired of paying for salt and lugging it into the basement and loading the softener, so I run un-softened water and just replace the water heater when it limes up with un-softened water rather than when it rusts out from softened water.

    Do you think using a few teaspoons of TSP instead of sending tens of pounds of salt into the wastewater is a good tradeoff? Or does Gaia not negotiate?

    1. Re:Unsweetened cocoa powder by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Do you think using a few teaspoons of TSP instead of sending tens of pounds of salt into the wastewater is a good tradeoff? Or does Gaia not negotiate?

      That depends entirely on your municipal waste water treatment plant. If it's anything like the 99% of other ones out there built in areas of hard water it will have no problem dealing with the salts which would have been part of the design criteria. TSP on the other hand was banned for a good reason, it's very difficult to remove from waste streams.

  77. Energy Conservation Theatre by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Don't get me started about Energy Star dehumidifiers!

    (channeling Krusty from the Simpsons) Isn't anyone here going to get me started?

    The Energy Star rating of dehumidifiers is a fraud because dehumidifiers are rated under continuous operation at a much higher level of humidity that anyone should have in their basement (who as it at 80 deg let alone 80 deg and 60 percent humidity in their basement?).

    Furthermore, a dehumidifier should use a humidistat to cycle the unit on and off to maintain a reasonable level of dryness rather than run all the time to claw at the air and try to make it desert dry. Dehumidifiers these days are using constant-fan, which during the compressor off time evaporates all of the moisture sticking to the coils with surface tension that you paid for electricity to condense during the on time. This can cut the efficiency by half and is not accounted for in the Energy Star Standard. The Florida Solar Energy Center explains this effect for central air conditioning and suggests some "hacks" to increase their moisture removal, but I cannot interest anyone at FSEC let alone EPA-Energy Star in this for dehumidifiers.

    Well, I guess Energy Star has "caught wise" to this issue because they started notating in their ratings which units run the fan continuously and which ones don't. But those clever manufacturers, they are running long run-on times of the fan that does the same thing as the units that cycle the fan off.

    The only thing I can guess is that the dehumidifier companies are having a hard time with refrigerant leaks, and maybe they think corrosion is a problem and the fan run on time is to prevent moisture from being in contact with the coils 100% of the time. Manufacturers used to have 5 year warranties on the "sealed" system that are now reduced to 1 year, and manufacturers do not honor their warranty. They will not repair a leaked unit, ever. They give you a coupon towards the purchase of a new unit that won't cover the recycling fee required for disposing of the old unit in many municipalities.

    I don't know. No one from EPA, the manufacturers, to Focus on Energy will talk about any of this and what can be done. It is energy conservation theatre of acting like they care about the environment rather than doing anything effective.

    For anyone out their that cares about electricity usage and wants to hack this, the suggestion from people who have tried is to find the humidity sensor, remove it from the cabinet and put it remote from the humidity given off by the wet coils. This lengthens the on/off cycle time which will reduce the fan run-on losses in efficiency more than the larger swings in room humidity reduce the unit efficiency.

    What I do is look at a humidity gauge in the basement every night and program an hour or maybe two of continuous running using the timer mode, checking the number of pints (pounds) of water in the bucket against the electric use logged with a Kill-a-Watt. I can get as much as 4 lbs moisture removed per kWHr vs 1.8 with the normal automatic mode of the unit.

    But gosh is this labor intensive. I am acting as one of the "valve boys" tending a Newcomen steam engine before the invention of valve gear. This is the freakin' 21st Century and I am operating the dehumidifier like an 18th Century mine pumping engine. Thanks, EPA!

  78. You all are missing an economic point here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's cheaper to develop a single machine, then provide multiple, different, levels of capability, based on the market you are aiming for.

  79. The Star Trek method... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    you're supposed to remove/scrape off any large pieces of food before putting dishes into the dishwasher. Doing that should prevent any clogging. No "pre-washing" is generally necessary, though many dishwashers will have trouble with certain gunky stuff (solidified eggs, peanut butter, etc.), and rinsing them may be helpful.

    Yes: Some kinds of stuck-on food may not come off in one cycle - after which heated drying may bake it on sufficiently that additional cycles won't touch it. You pretty much have to scrape it off anyhow, with more difficulty than if you had hand-washed in the first place.

    Also: Pre-loading hot-rinsing off any large clot of solidified of grease, reducing the total amount on the dishes, prevents said grease from using up all the dish soap in suspending (some of) it, leaving none to lift off grease-bound particles. (Some of the better machines will do this for you, but the new water-limiting regulations are driving manufacturers to drop that cycle.)

    I use what I call the "Star Trek" method: Knock off the bigger cling-ons, then let the automation handle the details.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:The Star Trek method... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You learn what your soap/machine doesn't handle and adjust. My current budget model has never failed to get a casserole dish clean. I don't wash much solidified grease, but eggs, and other things dried on wash off without issue. Unless you bought the top of the line with a disposer, you should be scraping anyway. Not a pre-clean, but scraping off the chunks. And even the top of the line won't wash "everything". Plates of spaghetti won't work. The noodles will wrap around the other dishes and racks, rather than going down. But they'll be clean noodles when done. But scrape off what you can, and the 1" and smaller pieces dried to the 2-week old plate will wash off fine. I've never had problems with peanut butter. And the kids have bowls of it all the time. Sometimes straight, sometimes with crackers. I've even tried sometimes without scraping.

  80. Swap out the controller board by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Swap out the controller board by ripping it out and replacing it with a 60 year old relays and resistors controller. The only problem with that is 50 years from now SWMBO will be harping on you to replace it, and you will be saying "but it still works great!"

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  81. The best hack if your a texican by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is employ a mexican !

  82. Real Hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real hackers will put a Raspberry Pi or a Beaglebone Black in there. It ain't worth hacking if it ain't running Linux.

  83. kitchen appliances by Mirar · · Score: 1

    As far as I've seen, all kitchen appliances are the same - but they are the same as in VHS players and CD players are the same.
    They have the same components, but they keep coming out with control boards that aren't compatible at all.

    It's probably easier to put in a raspberry pi with a relay board than to try to hack the control board.

    It's not like a dishwasher is very advanced. There's some water level sensors, valves for letting water in, pumps (one around, and one out?), heating element and hopefully a temperature sensor that can be read. Do whatever program you feel like. How hard can it be?

    That said, I'm still confused _no_ appliances (except iKettle) talks wifi (or anything, like BLE or zwave) - other appliances like TV and receivers have been talking to the user over the LAN for many years now.

    That said, my next appliance to hack will be my Tea Maker.

  84. Re:Try using alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you are not consuming enough.

  85. Re:Try using alcohol by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    Kein Bier ist auch keine Antwort, goes the German saying: "No beer isn't an answer, either".

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  86. Re:Try using alcohol by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    Have you tried a singularity ? These things are reputed to dissolve anything.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  87. My dishwasher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has any number of cycles and also has the AI built in to select the appropriate one. Only downside is she sometimes wants me to help. On the plus side she then adds an extra mode that's not so much geared towards washing but usually cleans my mind and pipes....

    LOL

  88. Dishwasher Tweakers? by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    Oh, hackers, not tweakers. I mis-read the headline.

    /Worked in a restaurant as a teen.

  89. Youve got the conspiracy ass-backwards by famebait · · Score: 1

    The extra programs are for making you give them more money for nothing much.
    You already hacked the system by getting the cheap one.

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  90. Not helpful by Grimmtooth · · Score: 1

    Geez, guys, where's your sense of adventure? I thought this was a place for hackers to gather. Instead I see a bunch of old fuddy-duddys going "why ever would you want to do that?" or "don't touch that, it might be important!" Hang your heads in shame.

    Dude, I know nothing of hacking dishwasher micro controllers, but I think you went to the wrong place. Maybe the AARP forums might have more adventurous souls.

    --
    /* .sigs are irrelevant */
  91. I'd love a hack to silence it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking thing runs silent, but when done, BEEP BEEP BEEP

    Apparently their engineers didn't understand the concept behind building a silent dishwasher.

  92. Xerox machines by nessman · · Score: 1

    Worked as a 3rd level support engineer for Xerox back from 1999-2003. There was a line of multifunction devices - the Document Centre. Some models were basically the same thing - in one case, the Document Centre 232 and 240. The difference between the two? 32 pages per minute and 40 pages per minute. Same machine - but with the right admin password on the user interface (the control panel), you could turn a 32 page per minute machine into a 40 page per minute machine and jack the price up by several thousand dollars as well as enable some other features that customers were made to pay for.

  93. pre-software by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    I had an old cheap washing machine with a mechanical timer. There were a normal and a permanent press cycle printed around the dial, and room for another cycle which was blank. Exploratory surgery revealed that the timer was in fact labelled with connections for a two speed motor which would provide a gentle cycle, as well as a gentler spin for the permanent press cycle, but this cheapo model had only the one speed motor. So, one cannibalized light dimmer later, the machine had two motor speeds and a third cycle to fill out the dial nicely. I'm pretty sure the difference in price between the two cycle and three cycle machines would have been more than whatever I spent for the dimmer.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  94. Might work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know of a piece of industrial electronics that only needs a jumper soldered in to become the more expensive version. It's actually manufactured as the more expensive version and then the jumper is cut just before packaging.

  95. Re:Try using alcohol by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Nothing will cut through the greasey grimey shleck baked onto my oven.

    Not toxic oven cleaner, not Brillo pads, not the self-cleaning feature (which uses exceptionally high temps to turn shit straight to ash). Anything that removes it only does so by removing the underlying steel and enamel of the oven itself.

    your oven has evolved its own protective coating, and can be expected to survive longer than its parents did.
    Darwinism in action.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  96. Re:Removed planned obsolescence on my induction-pl by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    The thing with induction plates is that the central components (power capacitors, switch, coil) must be high-quality, or the whole thing goes up in smoke very fast. Hence they have inherent long lifetime. Of course, manufacturers do not want that, they want people to buy new stuff, not use old stuff forever. What they do is add artificial weak points. Sometime you can find and fix them, and I did so for a generic induction plate.

    This plate has a 235V rectifier whose leads are pressing against an aluminum heat-sink. The leads are insulated with PVC-tubing that has a limited lifetime, even more so when heated up, which it is here. When it gets brittle, it stops insulating well, shortening out and blowing the non-replaceable fuse and likely other components. My fix was to saw out the piece of the heat sink that they pressed against. It should also work to replace the tubing with silicone-glass-cloth insulation tubing that has a very long lifetime. While the circuit has some electrolyte capacitors as well, they were all good quality 105C types and should live a long time. They should also not damage the circuit when they fail and hence can be replaced at need.

    i find in contemporary appliances, very often the failure is in the digital display, often the flat panel itself.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  97. Re:Hack by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Please stop with y our microaggressions. Womanual Cycle, please.

    Zanussi ZRB 327 WO manual https://www.manualscat.com/en/...
    i don't know which is funnier here, wo-manual or manual scat. neither one is all that funny, though.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  98. Re:Removed planned obsolescence on my induction-pl by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Also a good place to hide a weak point. My induction plate does only have some LEDs though and they are easily replaced. (Well, once you make a triangle-point screwdriver to get it open in the first place, but that took me all of 5 minutes.)

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  99. Re:Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're saying that washing dishes is women's work, then?

  100. Re:NFC tags instead of wireless, easier, more usef by Amazing+Proton+Boy · · Score: 1

    What phone and apps are you using? I can't think of a way to make that work on iOS or stock Android. Please tell us more as this seems like a really cool set up.

  101. Re:NFC tags instead of wireless, easier, more usef by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    It's more hardware dependent, not software, so any device with an NFC antenna (mine's from 2013), which a few years ago got added to more and more devices for contactless payments and wireless charging. In stock Android it defaults to enabled (some users turn NFC off to limit battery drain). Just search your preferred app store for NFC, there are multiple apps that trigger actions and provide nfc tools.

    For Apple, sorry, last I knew it wasn't available on their devices, new ones might have it for limited payments, but not available to developers yet according to a superficial google search. This is a case where the hardware might now start to be offered without software accessibility.

  102. lacking hardware by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    Users should demand standard interfaces between machines... your washer and dryer should transfer clothes when clean and wet without user intervention, regardless of make/model. General purpose robots for things that either aren't exactly repeated or don't occur very often, standardized machines for things that are repeated frequently.

  103. Re:The regulations have destroyed Dishwashers by xtronics · · Score: 1

    You know - I am complaining about nanny regulations - not the cops. Non of my friends that are cops give a s*** about how much water and electricity I use. And you might notice that the security issues here are a little different than in the middle east. (Was that a drunk post?)

    I'm all for the limited government - hard to see the need for the 48% of the economy we have now - making us much more of a socialist country than the Russians (at 35%) . How about 5%?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  104. Re:The regulations have destroyed Dishwashers by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

    You know - I am complaining about nanny regulations - not the cops. Regulations are worthless unless someone is there to enforce them.

    I'm all for the limited government - hard to see the need for the 48% of the economy we have now - making us much more of a socialist country than the Russians (at 35%) . How about 5%?

    Do you like 5 because it's less than 48? Or does 5 have a special meaning to you? If 5 is good, is 4 better? what about 3? If you argue for 5%, could I use your same arguments against you to argue for 2%? You seem to agree that zero is bad, so why is 5 the magic number?

  105. Re:NFC tags instead of wireless, easier, more usef by samwichse · · Score: 1

    What software do you us on your phone to do the automation?