There is nothing agaist fighting thost that kill babies in the Bible. Not a thing. Unless you think Jesus would have approved of ripping a baby to pieces with a vaccumm cleaner.
Submissions about advanced science, chip making methods, new programming languages, politicals (other than kerry is great) and other topics where all overlooked/denied to post a story about billfolds.
The ACLU thinks that taking money from people to support goals they like is ok, but if you take money from people to support goals the do not like it is wrong.
The ACLU is about as objective as Bush is. Hell, the don't believe in the RKBA/2nd adm. becuase they see it as a 'collective' right. Its the only right in the bill of rights that they see that way, funny how that works.
In one case the ACLU says that people can be forced to pay out of their taxes for things they do not support. But on an issue the ACLU doesn't like it is suddenly wrong to force others to pay taxes for things they do not support.
I am not comparing those two issues, I am comparing what the ACLU says on those issues.
In one case the ACLU says that people can be forced to pay out of their taxes for things they do not support. But on an issue the ACLU doesn't like it is suddenly wrong to force others to pay taxes for things they do not support.
What about those who are morally or religiously opposed to abortion?
Our tax dollars fund many programs that individual people oppose. For example, those who oppose war on moral or religious grounds pay taxes that are applied to military programs. The congressional bans on abortion funding impose a particular religious or moral viewpoint on those women who rely on government-funded health care. Providing funding for abortion does not encourage or compel women to have abortions, but denying funding compels many women to carry their pregnancies to term. Nondiscriminatory funding would simply place the profoundly personal decision about how to treat a pregnancy back where it belongs -- in the hands of the woman who must live with the consequences of that decision.
Yet when they describe their opposition to school vouchers, they say this:
It still doesn't sound natural, this text sounds like a female Kirk read it.
We would like to know if something does not sound quite right. After entering some text and listening to it, please fill out a feedback form and tell us what was mispronounced. And please note that no language translation is done so, for example, if you choose a French voice you should submit French text.)
Slashdot Mirror
There is nothing agaist fighting thost that kill babies in the Bible. Not a thing. Unless you think Jesus would have approved of ripping a baby to pieces with a vaccumm cleaner.
Try reading it, it is a rather good book.
Submissions about advanced science, chip making methods, new programming languages, politicals (other than kerry is great) and other topics where all overlooked/denied to post a story about billfolds.
This is funny!
Please provide me with the numbers of the bills that Kerry and Edwards have introduced to make changes to the Patriot Act.
I also love the Dems support of the Rave Act, wasn't daschel and/or ghephart a major supporter of that?
Email me and as soon as I get another invite I will invite you.
I bet it pisses you off that they get non-profit tax breaks too. What about the fact that they use the roads?
ShutUp! Newbie!!!
Vouchers would be good at ANY private or public school. They do not favor one religion over another.
The ACLU thinks that taking money from people to support goals they like is ok, but if you take money from people to support goals the do not like it is wrong.
The ACLU is about as objective as Bush is. Hell, the don't believe in the RKBA/2nd adm. becuase they see it as a 'collective' right. Its the only right in the bill of rights that they see that way, funny how that works.
Large portions of the patriot act were written by people that had a D beside their name.
In one case the ACLU says that people can be forced to pay out of their taxes for things they do not support. But on an issue the ACLU doesn't like it is suddenly wrong to force others to pay taxes for things they do not support.
I am not comparing those two issues, I am comparing what the ACLU says on those issues.
In one case the ACLU says that people can be forced to pay out of their taxes for things they do not support. But on an issue the ACLU doesn't like it is suddenly wrong to force others to pay taxes for things they do not support.
That isn't consistant, is it?
Use different gas stations to buy your money orders.
Or you could just pay cash and use money orders.
Please remind me of all the Dems that voted against the patriot act.
Thanks in advance.
What follows is from another site but it shows the ACLU isn't as consistant as some say they are.
v eRights.cfm?ID=9039&c=146
e rty.cfm?ID=10778&c=140
Quoted text follows.
Explaining their support for taxpayer-funded abortions, they say this:
http://www.aclu.org/ReproductiveRights/Reproducti
What about those who are morally or religiously opposed to abortion?
Our tax dollars fund many programs that individual people oppose. For example, those who oppose war on moral or religious grounds pay taxes that are applied to military programs. The congressional bans on abortion funding impose a particular religious or moral viewpoint on those women who rely on government-funded health care. Providing funding for abortion does not encourage or compel women to have abortions, but denying funding compels many women to carry their pregnancies to term. Nondiscriminatory funding would simply place the profoundly personal decision about how to treat a pregnancy back where it belongs -- in the hands of the woman who must live with the consequences of that decision.
Yet when they describe their opposition to school vouchers, they say this:
http://www.aclu.org/ReligiousLiberty/ReligiousLib
School voucher schemes would force all taxpayers to support religious beliefs and practices with which they may strongly disagree.
2 BILLION isn't a handout.
Isn't the Pills for Votes program that Bush signed "Socialized healthcare"?
Isn't the huge growth in Non Defense/Non Homeland Security spending that bush has signed support of "nefficient Government Programs"?
And what would you call No Child Left Behind? Isn't it support of "Failing State Run Public Schools"?
The why aren't that that many complaints in lawyer happy America?
No, most of those are in the sigs and you can turn the display of those off.
You do know that China, one of the most polluting countries on the planet, and India are almost exempt from that Treaty, don't you?
You should also look at what Putin is trying to do to Democracy in Russia, it ain't good.
Kind of like how Bush is a very large supporter of China, even thought they force women to have abortions if they have an unauthorized child?
Both could care less, they just want your vote and your money.
Your lengthly post breaks down into this.
527's that support Kerry = Good
527's that support Bush = Bad
What was Cerfs position at MCI/WorldCom during the MCI/WorldCom 'Issue'?
It still doesn't sound natural, this text sounds like a female Kirk read it.
We would like to know if something does not sound quite right. After entering some text and listening to it, please fill out a feedback form and tell us what was mispronounced. And please note that no language translation is done so, for example, if you choose a French voice you should submit French text.)
(That text is from the same page.)
Then what do you think was being implied?