What, you mean like westerners usually push on honing stones while japanese will draw backwards? Or commonly, westerners just use poor quality metals and just use a grinder? Or that western carpenters push their planes while japs pull them? We are talking about general differences not whether or not a certain culture was aware of another way of doing things or can't you follow a conversation?
If they don't cut on a forward stroke, my gosh, then they must cut on the back stroke! You know, where you can leverage your body weight and keep the blade under tension, both which lead to a more precise cut with less energy expenditure and you can use a thinner blade.
I'm an attorney. I'm pretty sure that I know what the definition of evidence is as it applies to the law that I practice and so has no real bearing on this.
Just a simple example from the root of karma, good karma = good, bad karma=evil, both are karma, neither is a desired state, akarmic action is what is sought after. Buddhism talks about equanimity, which is basically the same.
Let us start with the differences between Religion, Spirituality, and Churches, mainly US Churches. Only one of those three asks you to blindly accept what they are saying. Why, it's exactly the same attitude as US science, US industry, etc...
Japan is WAY different. You must live in the US, no? Even Canada has a different outlook.
One of the biggest differences is in the use of tools. Westerners prefer to attack things and use force. They saw with a pushing motion which requires more effort for a less precise cut. They sharpen their knifes by attacking the steel which gives a less precise sharpening. They cut their meats by a forward imprecise motion. They join two pieces of wood by piercing them with nails resulting in flimsy houses. They create pottery by pushing not receiving, necessitating thicker walls. The list goes on and on.
What we really need is someone to graph out basic logical thinking abilities for the same time period, let alone that the guy hasn't proven anything. Has he linked to percentage of people who had internet access during the time frames? Who were the first adopters of the internet? What was the ratio of adoption between secular and non-secular? In 1991 I attended the only cegep in canada to have internet access. It may have started in the 90's but it was a long time before most people had access.
I can almost 100% gaurantee that actual thinking in general has decreased.
A prime example is slashdot. Where the 'educated' people can only construct strawmen and cover them with a religious robe. They do not understand what they are arguing against! What we have now is a generation of parrots. There is no thinking anymore, there is only google.
Your head is baked. Man gained the possibility of the knowledge of good and evil, the 'power' of the 'elohim'. Therefore it is logical that man can judge something good or evil. Whether he is right depends on the how fulfilled his knowledge is, exactly the same as a god.
The bible says nothing about man being 'broken'. That is your church talking.
Do not mix what the bible says and what the church says, especially US churches. You will be less confused. It basically boils down to a wrong interpretation of 'all-knowing'.
ah, but you forgot to take into account that the tweets come with subliminal messages based on advances in EBS, steganographically concealed using the latest alien compression tech.
Slashdot Mirror
So, you didn't read the article did you.
Is the question about what happened to the anti-matter, or what happened to our theory?
What, you mean like westerners usually push on honing stones while japanese will draw backwards? Or commonly, westerners just use poor quality metals and just use a grinder? Or that western carpenters push their planes while japs pull them? We are talking about general differences not whether or not a certain culture was aware of another way of doing things or can't you follow a conversation?
If they don't cut on a forward stroke, my gosh, then they must cut on the back stroke! You know, where you can leverage your body weight and keep the blade under tension, both which lead to a more precise cut with less energy expenditure and you can use a thinner blade.
I'm an attorney. I'm pretty sure that I know what the definition of evidence is as it applies to the law that I practice and so has no real bearing on this.
FTFY
Stop confusing the bible and the US churches!!
Just a simple example from the root of karma, good karma = good, bad karma=evil, both are karma, neither is a desired state, akarmic action is what is sought after. Buddhism talks about equanimity, which is basically the same.
On my first day to the gym I couldn't press 80lbs...
These stupid riddles are fancy strawmen.
If you want to understand why 'god' allows these things, then understand first why YOU allow them.
Education leads to agnosticism, buying into another belief system(science ftw!) teaches you atheism.
It appears to me this study carries a flaw that many do, which is the intent to prove something rather than discover it.
Ah, so you don't understand science?
yup, that seems real intelligent to me.
Let us start with the differences between Religion, Spirituality, and Churches, mainly US Churches. Only one of those three asks you to blindly accept what they are saying. Why, it's exactly the same attitude as US science, US industry, etc...
One of the biggest differences is in the use of tools. Westerners prefer to attack things and use force. They saw with a pushing motion which requires more effort for a less precise cut. They sharpen their knifes by attacking the steel which gives a less precise sharpening. They cut their meats by a forward imprecise motion. They join two pieces of wood by piercing them with nails resulting in flimsy houses. They create pottery by pushing not receiving, necessitating thicker walls. The list goes on and on.
What we really need is someone to graph out basic logical thinking abilities for the same time period, let alone that the guy hasn't proven anything. Has he linked to percentage of people who had internet access during the time frames? Who were the first adopters of the internet? What was the ratio of adoption between secular and non-secular? In 1991 I attended the only cegep in canada to have internet access. It may have started in the 90's but it was a long time before most people had access.
I can almost 100% gaurantee that actual thinking in general has decreased.
A prime example is slashdot. Where the 'educated' people can only construct strawmen and cover them with a religious robe. They do not understand what they are arguing against! What we have now is a generation of parrots. There is no thinking anymore, there is only google.
Lucifer is a distinct 'being'. Satan is 'enemy', it is not a person. Just like 'sin' is not evil, but brings the possibility of bad.
It's almost like they have two different brains to store the stuff in!
The bible says nothing about man being 'broken'. That is your church talking.
Do not mix what the bible says and what the church says, especially US churches. You will be less confused. It basically boils down to a wrong interpretation of 'all-knowing'.
ah, but you forgot to take into account that the tweets come with subliminal messages based on advances in EBS, steganographically concealed using the latest alien compression tech.
News at 11
Is that a cold press extraction or your basic toxic-solvent + centrifuge?
Unless of course you're one of those people that would rather do a websearch than consult the manual you get.
Whether you live in an affluent neighbourhood and/or spend lots of money may be correlated with Income but ...
Two of everything should be more than anybody needs!