However, it is extremely obvious to anybody who can speak mandarin and any dialect and who has any inkling of how sound formation and tone generation works in the human system, easily checked by which resonance chambers are being used during speech. I'm sorry if you have so little recognition of your own human systems and the languages in question that you will have to wait for somebody else to tell you if it is true or not.
p.s. apparently i was wrong and it has been studied and the restrictions placed on mandarin have been noted, but you should be able to find those yourself if you're interested.
Perhaps it's not what people fail to understand but what you fail to understand?
If one becomes familiar with say, cantonese, hokkien, and toi-san, and has any knowledge of linguistics then the paths each dialect took in terms of sound aggregation, consonant drift, certain emphasis on certain parts of the mouth start to become obvious which opens up even more understanding of an unknown dialect.
In general we call USians stuff like 'pompous asses', aggresive dicks, gringos, delusional, scourge of the planet, etc... or in derisive tones 'american'.
They never invented a specific term for themselves because their self-centeredness is so great that no other culture/society in the area is given any thought or importance. Hence the reason why all other cultures in the area have given them names in deference to their self-importance.
You do not understand how chinese systems work! Always assume what you have to say applies to yourself and then decide whether you should show everybody what you lack!
Taking the big two, cantonese and mandarin, there are actually different characters in cantonese because certain concepts are viewed differently, there is even different word order and final accents. e.g., 'do you have' translated from mandarin to cantonese via characters 'yauh mut-yauh' and in cantonese 'yauh mouh'? Movement away from a general negator to specific negated words is a big thing!
Mandarin is actually complex in concepts and combinations because it is simplified in speech, imposing a restriction on all the low tones, it is 'haughty' in nature. There is also a mandarin alphabet, it accompanies pretty much all characters in childrens books so that they can learn the pronounciation of the characters. It is not difficult to learn at all. The most difficult thing is the imposed restriction on how you communicate, taking away all the flavour.
Well, very easy to disprove that theory. There are, after all, many unfortunate cases of people, like me, very deficient in these sympathetic mirror neurons that are/were totally unable to learn from others. Yet, i still had language. Granted, i did not understand words where the energetic purpose behind them created a specific subjective kinesthethic 'feeling', e.g., looking down, stand tall, chin up, stiff upper lip,etc...
I'm actually working on a system that breaks down subjective human experience into the myriad energetic possibilities, names those energetic precursors and allows translation between different languages through the energetic precursors and not the somewhat arbitrary language specific words we use. For example, the current colloquial 'sweet' has replaced prior words that carry the same energetic experiential rote such as 'bitchin' or 'rad', yet softened it for more general wide spread use.
Though it is only one aspect of it and it seems a major aspect when dealing with colloquial conversation, it may not be the be all and end all of langauges as he tends to think. Then again, it usually takes the broken people to notice where theories fall apart. Studying people with only 2d eyesight and why they can't see 3d illusions would have advanced the field significantly faster than current stuff put forth by people with 3d eyesight.
It's all about ability to take cues from another persons face and be able to replicate them. If you can't put yourself 'inside' another person to learn a physical motion, then this 'illusion' won't work on you. Illusion isn't the correct term since it's in fact just a more dominant sense replacing input of a less dominant sense. They should actually be able to turn this 'illusion' on its head by testing people whose auditory senses are more dominant than their visual ones.
The idea seems to be that once you're dying you start ejecting mass out of both your mouth and anus, in which case they would be aligned perpendicular to the plane of the galaxy.
Well, like I said, I could have quoted any number of uncontested (as long as you listen to scholars and not the church) manuscripts. Just happened that I had that one opened in a tab at the moment.
Note, i'm also not saying that everything paul said or influenced is a lie. It's amazingly skillful what was left in and what was left out to make the church the only road to salvation and in some cases to directly undermine the advances Jesus was trying to teach.
Slashdot Mirror
Good thing it's not a netbook!
What a farce. Facebook makes it's money off spam, hence the reason if you report something as spam or offensive it will STILL pop up on your newsfeed.
Nah, it'll be really fun to watch as your kids grow through multiples of antenna length.
nouns and concepts are one thing. What brings meaning to communication is the words inbetween that communicate relation.
Look, it's a , ah, um, a sheerson(?) in the wild.
However, it is extremely obvious to anybody who can speak mandarin and any dialect and who has any inkling of how sound formation and tone generation works in the human system, easily checked by which resonance chambers are being used during speech. I'm sorry if you have so little recognition of your own human systems and the languages in question that you will have to wait for somebody else to tell you if it is true or not.
p.s. apparently i was wrong and it has been studied and the restrictions placed on mandarin have been noted, but you should be able to find those yourself if you're interested.
Interesting in what dialect is it Go? Wondering what interactions they had with japanese since that's the japanese pronounciation.
If one becomes familiar with say, cantonese, hokkien, and toi-san, and has any knowledge of linguistics then the paths each dialect took in terms of sound aggregation, consonant drift, certain emphasis on certain parts of the mouth start to become obvious which opens up even more understanding of an unknown dialect.
um. no.
Lots of spanish tv stations have been number one in America. Never been to mexico or any other spanish speaking country in america?
They never invented a specific term for themselves because their self-centeredness is so great that no other culture/society in the area is given any thought or importance. Hence the reason why all other cultures in the area have given them names in deference to their self-importance.
Except that in the Quran all the accents are kept in to deal with ambiguity. So, apart from dismissing reality, you might have a good point.
So how good are you at reading spanish, italian, or french? After all, we all use the same alphabet.
Taking the big two, cantonese and mandarin, there are actually different characters in cantonese because certain concepts are viewed differently, there is even different word order and final accents. e.g., 'do you have' translated from mandarin to cantonese via characters 'yauh mut-yauh' and in cantonese 'yauh mouh'? Movement away from a general negator to specific negated words is a big thing!
Mandarin is actually complex in concepts and combinations because it is simplified in speech, imposing a restriction on all the low tones, it is 'haughty' in nature. There is also a mandarin alphabet, it accompanies pretty much all characters in childrens books so that they can learn the pronounciation of the characters. It is not difficult to learn at all. The most difficult thing is the imposed restriction on how you communicate, taking away all the flavour.
I'm actually working on a system that breaks down subjective human experience into the myriad energetic possibilities, names those energetic precursors and allows translation between different languages through the energetic precursors and not the somewhat arbitrary language specific words we use. For example, the current colloquial 'sweet' has replaced prior words that carry the same energetic experiential rote such as 'bitchin' or 'rad', yet softened it for more general wide spread use.
Though it is only one aspect of it and it seems a major aspect when dealing with colloquial conversation, it may not be the be all and end all of langauges as he tends to think. Then again, it usually takes the broken people to notice where theories fall apart. Studying people with only 2d eyesight and why they can't see 3d illusions would have advanced the field significantly faster than current stuff put forth by people with 3d eyesight.
It's all about ability to take cues from another persons face and be able to replicate them. If you can't put yourself 'inside' another person to learn a physical motion, then this 'illusion' won't work on you. Illusion isn't the correct term since it's in fact just a more dominant sense replacing input of a less dominant sense. They should actually be able to turn this 'illusion' on its head by testing people whose auditory senses are more dominant than their visual ones.
All his children? Or just the ones trying to profit? Perhaps you should think before you paint everybody with the same brush?
You're confused. Perhaps you should find out what you're talking about?
They left it out to try and get dinner reservations before anybody else.
The idea seems to be that once you're dying you start ejecting mass out of both your mouth and anus, in which case they would be aligned perpendicular to the plane of the galaxy.
Anyone?
Nice try at trying to fit me into your preconceived notions though.
What colour is the sky in your world?
Note, i'm also not saying that everything paul said or influenced is a lie. It's amazingly skillful what was left in and what was left out to make the church the only road to salvation and in some cases to directly undermine the advances Jesus was trying to teach.
Why water rock?