I don't think that counts as being "created by the hand of man". It's the same DNA that evolved over millions of years. Humans just took it and made another copy in a lab.
It's not self-importance. It's the exact opposite. We might know more and understand the issue better, but I seriously doubt that there are enough of us, or that we are close enough to the public eye, to make a difference.
Tech-savvy people will use those browsers and sites. The vast majority of people on the internet have no idea that this issue even exists or why it's important.
As I said, rich men are politically dominant. It's the rest of the men who do most of the work and definitely don't hold most of the wealth. Don't think for a second that rich men have any inclination to help them out just because they share the same kind of reproductive plumbing.
Let's get something straight. Men are not politically dominant. Rich men are politically dominant.
If men in general were politically dominant, then it wouldn't be the case that 75% of all homeless people are male while there are numerous homeless shelters that cater strictly to women.
If men in general were politically dominant, then we wouldn't have men being forced to pay child support for children that the courts acknowledge aren't even theirs.
If men in general were politically dominant, then Title IX wouldn't instruct colleges to kick out men on the mere allegation of sexual misconduct (the "preponderance of evidence" clause) rather than requiring actual evidence.
Yes, because no regular person could possibly know more about the capabilities of business and government than one of the best astrophysicists in the world.
I have nothing but respect for the guy, but this is not his area of expertise.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't think that counts as being "created by the hand of man". It's the same DNA that evolved over millions of years. Humans just took it and made another copy in a lab.
Why not? Whether something has rights or not should be contingent on its own characteristics, not its origins.
If it works just like a human brain, at what point should it be considered to have the same rights as a human?
Beige Goo?
Yeah. That'll be a few versions down the road.
It's not self-importance. It's the exact opposite. We might know more and understand the issue better, but I seriously doubt that there are enough of us, or that we are close enough to the public eye, to make a difference.
Tech-savvy people will use those browsers and sites. The vast majority of people on the internet have no idea that this issue even exists or why it's important.
How near?
True, but the government is demonstrating how much of an asshat it is by denying people entry solely on account of peaceful criticism.
The systems that recognize child abuse are usually comparing it with known photos.
How long does it take to charge the battery?
He's getting Dell.
It's debatable whether Bush actually was elected in the first place.
As I said, rich men are politically dominant. It's the rest of the men who do most of the work and definitely don't hold most of the wealth. Don't think for a second that rich men have any inclination to help them out just because they share the same kind of reproductive plumbing.
Anyone who calls someone else a neckbeard automatically renders their own opinions irrelevant. Why don't you call them shitlords while you're at it?
You don't want a discussion. You want to silence dissent.
Let's get something straight. Men are not politically dominant. Rich men are politically dominant.
If men in general were politically dominant, then it wouldn't be the case that 75% of all homeless people are male while there are numerous homeless shelters that cater strictly to women.
If men in general were politically dominant, then we wouldn't have men being forced to pay child support for children that the courts acknowledge aren't even theirs.
If men in general were politically dominant, then Title IX wouldn't instruct colleges to kick out men on the mere allegation of sexual misconduct (the "preponderance of evidence" clause) rather than requiring actual evidence.
trick executes you.
True, but the point is that they were accepting and publishing them. You could have put one if if you wanted to.
Yes, because no regular person could possibly know more about the capabilities of business and government than one of the best astrophysicists in the world.
I have nothing but respect for the guy, but this is not his area of expertise.
Any new technology will destroy jobs. It will also create new jobs, and pave the way for entire new industries.
Don't forget truckers.
There's a list of individuals there that submitted comments.
I use /. because if I don't block my office computer's access to reddit, I don't get any work done.
What if you're not on facebook at all?
The problem is, how do you know whether the bank even uses that as a metric?