Slashdot Mirror


Man Killed By His Own Radio-Controlled Helicopter In Brooklyn

An anonymous reader sends this news from the Wall Street Journal: "A 19-year-old model helicopter enthusiast was killed Thursday when a toy helicopter he was flying struck him in the head, a law-enforcement official said. Victim Roman Pirozek 'was known to be aggressive in his flying and often executed tricks. He was executing a trick when he was struck,' the official said. Mr. Pirozek – depicted in [this YouTube video] he posted in July — was flying a remote-controlled helicopter worth about $2,000 when it struck him, cutting off the top of his head, the official said. The Woodhaven, Queens, resident was pronounced dead at the scene. His father was with him at the time of the accident, the official said."

479 comments

  1. OUCH by cod3r_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Holy hell that's insane. What a way to go :(

    1. Re:OUCH by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No kidding. I have no doubt this story discussion will be filled with jokes (somewhat understandably), but man that's horrible for his father as well. My thoughts and prayers go out for that family.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:OUCH by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have no doubt this story discussion will be filled with jokes

      Such as, "Pics or it didn't happen"?

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:OUCH by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Holy hell that's insane. What a way to go :(

      At least he died doing what he loved. But in the last 60 seconds of the youtube video, he lands the helicopter on a table just a few feet from his face, while he is seated and thus unable to dodge it easily. One of his friends isn't even wearing eye protection. He was taking dumb risks and it isn't a total surprise that he was later killed. I fly R/C helicopters, and mine are small enough that they could barely leave a scratch, but I would never land one that close to a seated person, and I would never operate in the vicinity of someone without eye protection (parts can come loose, and even small helicopters can kick up debris).

    4. Re:OUCH by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, not so much jokes as Darwin award nominations. You basically fly a high-horsepower rotating sword directly at yourself for no reason outdoors where the wind can change in a second. That's definitely up there on the list. This guy isn't exactly a firefighter running into a burning building. There is zero legitimate reason to fly a deadly helicopter at yourself just to do a trick.

    5. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, people don't care about the death of a man's child, even if he was 19. Think how his parents, his family and friends are feeling right now.

      If you wouldn't say it to their faces, don't fucking say it at all.

    6. Re:OUCH by Splab · · Score: 5, Informative

      At first I thought, fuck man, that sucks, but then I read that one of his tricks was to fly the helicopter close to his head.

      This was a pure Darwin Award moment, plain and simple, stupid trick ended with someone getting hurt. It's up there with torn groin videos from bad landings...

    7. Re:OUCH by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Holy hell that's insane. What a way to go :(

      Ah, but he died doing something he enjoyed. Isn't that the dream of every man?

      Here Lies Ackthpt, Fully Debugged At Last

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:OUCH by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 5, Funny

      quick, lets ban them! think of the children :D

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    9. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      pics or it didn't happen

    10. Re:OUCH by BitZtream · · Score: 5, Informative

      Which is sad.

      Some facts about R/C Heli's in the same general class as the one that killed him:

      They weigh roughly 10-12lbs, this one was a gas turbine, so it likely weighed a little more.
      The rotors each weigh about 3/4 lbs, most of the weight being from lead added near the tips to facilitate autorotation.
      They can fly at speeds up to 100mph, though its unlikely he ever went over 30mph when doing 3d aerobatics.
      The rotor tips in non-aerobatic flight travel at about 300mph.
      In aerobatic modes, the rotor speed goes up by about 30% so you have reserve power, that brings them to nearly 400mph.
      Carbon fiber blades are used not because they are lighter (you really don't want lighter blades at that size), they are more rigid, flex is wasted energy and can cause tail boom strikes.

      Doing the math on the rotor blades, .325kg * 175m/s * 0.5 = ~28.4 the tips carry approximately 28 joules of energy assuming they don't separate from the rotor head.

      That in and of itself, not so impressive. If you get hit with the broad side of a rotor, it hurts like hell, but won't even bruise most people.

      But thats not what happens. Even if the rotor separates from the hub in a crash, they are aerodynamically stable. They are wings after all. They fly straight and true in almost every case with the weighted leading edge up front.

      Thats 28 joules of energy in what is basically a knife edge. It can easily severe a leg at the ankle.

      These are miniature aircraft. They are easily deadly.

      I've put multiple helis into the ground to avoid possibly hitting someone or something, some of the scariest experiences I've ever had were due to a out of control heli. The worst was where I didn't properly fasten the radio antenna and it got pulled into the rotor blade during inverted flight nearly directly over the flight line (where everyone stands to fly) at our local club. Nothing I could do at that point but watch it tumble towards the ground and yell at people to scatter. I was able to recover the aircraft when it got closer to me and without hurting anyone, but you can not imagine the fear people had as the aircraft was tumbling towards them.

      Jokes about this kid getting hurt are about as funny as jokes about the Shuttle Columbia's last re-entry.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re:OUCH by krovisser · · Score: 5, Funny

      Careful, this is NY were are talking about.

    12. Re:OUCH by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sorry Missus Coward but I have a fricking hard time feeling sorry for somebody who kills themselves with their own toy from the sounds of it doing some jackass stunt with the damned thing. Either have enough damned sense to use the thing with proper levels of safety or don't be surprised when your own stupidity takes you out of the gene pool.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:OUCH by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe he was just trying a random stunt that he though up off the top of his head.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    14. Re:OUCH by davidwr · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I've got jokes running through my head just like a lot of other people, but a man died. Family and friends are grieving.

      Human decency requires a suitable interval before making light of such a tragedy. By the time that interval passes, this thread will be in archive mode.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    15. Re:OUCH by radiumsoup · · Score: 2

      Jokes about this kid getting hurt are about as funny as jokes about the Shuttle Columbia's last re-entry.

      All of this, and many times over.

    16. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Wall Street Journal version of the story (first link) has pics...

    17. Re:OUCH by kimvette · · Score: 4, Interesting

      in MA that would definitely happen. As it is Nannychusetts now requires all dirt bikes and ATVs to be registered (even if used only on your own private property!) and no one under 16 may operate any such vehicles at any time (even under guardian supervision), except to train within 21 days of a sanctioned competition.

      I see it now: all RC devices are now required to be registered and may not be operated by minors (even under guardian supervision) unless within one week of a sanctioned event.

      Thankfully I don't live in People's Republik of Nannychusetts any more. I know NYC can be pretty draconian but they don't compare to the insanity of Nannychusetts, sugary drink ban notwithstanding.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    18. Re:OUCH by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe if the Shuttle Columbia was trying to do inverted tricks on re-entry.

      Otherwise, it's not much different than someone juggling chainsaws that are running.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    19. Re:OUCH by inking · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, but is it his fault for being stupid? It's not like he selected the "dumbass" trait at character creation nineteen years ago.

    20. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People do dangerous recreational activities all the time, it's called being human. People like you who call the former stupid because they died accidentally form only a small part of a human, the pompous ass part.

    21. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um, sorry, but you acknowledge (and even highlight) the danger and then go on to say how you basically almost decapitated a spectator by flying this admittedly deadly thing directly above them and losing control of it. Remind me never to be in the same park where you're flying.
      If this hobbyist was flying it close to himself he was taking a serious, and seemingly well understood, risk. You play Russian roulette long enough and your luck runs out, period.

    22. Re:OUCH by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! If I had mod points... you owe me a new monitor and keyboard.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    23. Re:OUCH by tolydude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would imagine that anyone making jokes about this has no children. To anyone with kids, the thought of something like this happening is simply gut-wrenching. But since relations with the opposite sex are required for procreation, I guess the tasteless jokes and, what's worse, modding up of such, is to be expected here.

    24. Re:OUCH by schneidafunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well maybe this is the wrong crowd, but I feel sorry for the family. A kid just died, stupid as he may be.

      “He was the best person ever. He had the biggest heart,” said Mr. Pirozek’s sister, Amy Pirozek. “I think he was just doing it because it was his day off.”

      She said he worked as a cargo handler for an airline. “He always protected me,” she said. “He was a good brother. I’ll never forget that.”

      --
      Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    25. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATVs makes sense (in that if we are going to require registration of other internal combustion engine vehicles, why should an ATV get an exception?), but dirt bikes? WTF?

    26. Re:OUCH by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      "Jokes about this kid getting hurt are about as funny as jokes about the Shuttle Columbia's last re-entry."

      While in real life it is sad, but most of us are rather distant from the actual person. It explains the jokes, but doesn't excuse it.

      But we have the Darwin awards and we laugh at them too, we often don't think of the guys family who is missing a loved one now, due to some bad decisions on his part.

      We have jokes like What is a Rednecks last word "Hey Billy Bob!, Watch This!"...

      The truth is life isn't Fair or Safe, and we humans don't always make good decisions all the time.
      People die in car accidents because, they were to impatient to look, or factor in the weather.
      People die from eating too much the wrong foods, or drinking the wrong drink.
      People die when inhale toxic smoke and fumes because it gives them a bit of a buzz.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    27. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would make the vast majority of humans "pompous asses" according to you. Survival instincts exist for a reason.

    28. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, pretty much this.
      If you can't engage in your hobby without unreasonable risk to others and preferably also yourself, find a new hobby. If you can mitigate almost all of the risk by KEEPING THE BLADES THE HECK AWAY FROM YOURSELF AND OTHERS AT ALL TIMES, especially while doing tricks, then do so, otherwise, go back to playing with with plush toys.

    29. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people wonder why "geeks" live in basements and don't reproduce...

    30. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. A ton of people sitting behind their keyboard with comments the probably wouldn't dare make in person...

    31. Re:OUCH by SpzToid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      NPR was just doing a similar story about folks who skydive in flying squirrel wingsuits. They say there's no thrill like flying above the earth at well over 100MPH. It is also implied and understood there is no such thing as a do-over either. Life is inherently risky, while risks of death can be a real turn-on for folks.

      http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/08/27/215784315/wingsuit-flying-incredible-thrill-but-no-second-chance

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    32. Re:OUCH by linuxbert · · Score: 1

      Sadly he is not the first..

      most cities have bylaws respecting the use of gas powered r/c craft in parks /public places, and my R/C Scale boat club (Nothing high speed, or gas) carries 2 million in liability insurance.

    33. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is something profoundly wrong if your first (only?) reaction to tragedy is to blame the injured. I guess compassion really is hard for a lot of people. At some point in your life you've done something that could have potentially killed you. At some point in your life, you'll be thankful for the kindness of strangers. Every day you do something stupid, as do we all, it's just a question of whether we admit it or like to pretend. I guarantee you that you wouldn't have a hard time feeling sorry for this young man if you had known him for more than a Slashdot story.

    34. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say this to their faces: It was his OWN damn fault.

    35. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "dirt bike" they mean an off-road motorcycle, not a pedal bike.

    36. Re:OUCH by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's his fault for not taking proper precautions. He was 19, an adult, and apparently had many, many hours of previous experience.

      If all of that didn't instill in him the need to take basic precautions, what other conclusion can one make?

      If I'm driving down a back road at 60 mph, stiff arming the steering wheel because that's how the cool kids drive, yacking on my phone while leaning against the door and don't make it through a turn, I can guarantee people would call me a dumbass or stupid for my actions.

      This is no different. To bring up a phrase which will immediately get me marked as Troll, personal responsibility. It was his responsibility to make sure both he and anyone everyone else watching was in a safe location before attempting these stunts. He failed to do that and suffered the consequences.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    37. Re:OUCH by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Maybe he was just trying a random stunt that he though up off the top of his head.

      I see we have Ba'al fan:

      • Ba'al: Apophis. Last of the System Lords to stand against me. What have you to say to your new sovereign?
      • Apophis: May your reign last days, and your death, years.
      • Ba'al: That's actually rather good, isn't it? Did you plan to say that when you walked in?
      • [Ba'al cuts off the top of Apophis' head]
      • Ba'al: Or was it just off the top of your head?

      (Watch out for women with sharp knives...)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    38. Re:OUCH by malkavian · · Score: 2

      Teenagers are neurologically wired to take risks. It's part of the development of brains; many go on to do circus tricks far more dangerous (hell, American Football is as dangerous; there's zero legitimate reason to run full pelt into another guy who's also running full pelt at you, just to grab a ball.. Yet it's an American national sport that everyone applauds!).
      This guy was involved in a scene that often leads to interest in aeronautics and engineering, certainly a more technical side than most, so I don't think he was as 'stupid' as many here seem to think.. He made one mistake, and it was a fatal one.. That's a sad thing..
      Sportsmen who push the edge always expose themselves to risk, but they're also the ones that if they survive, everyone applauds the most.

    39. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people die every single day. Do you grieve for all of the kids who starve to death in Africa? Do you grieve for the victims of the constant conflicts in the Middle East? Didn't think so.

      What matters if if you know the person or not. It's perfectly acceptable to joke about the death of someone you never knew or even knew of.

    40. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I'm sure it could kill you, it's not going to take off your head highlander style.

      All evidence points to the contrary. Are you completely unaware of the article you are commenting on?

    41. Re:OUCH by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The larger ones are going to be somewhat easier to control as they have more mass and aren't as likely to move randomly with small air currents. But, with that comes more inertia when they do move, which means that if you screw up, it takes more to get them back under control. And you don't have the option of just letting them crash.

      I'm guessing that a lot of people don't realize how much force are in the blades of a helicopter that size. I know I've never thought about it.

    42. Re:OUCH by hedwards · · Score: 1

      My dad likes guns, but that doesn't mean that he should engage in stupid practices with it or is any less dead if something happens as a result.

      Died doing something somebody loved, is something people say when the consequences of their own stupidity led to their own demise. I've never heard somebody saying that about a book lover who died reading a book. The main reason being that there's no point, you don't need to rationalize the death.

    43. Re:OUCH by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Jokes about this kid getting hurt are about as funny as jokes about the Shuttle Columbia's last re-entry.

      Yeap, I agree completely.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    44. Re:OUCH by jythie · · Score: 1

      Basic precautions? The only one that would have really helped would be a helmet, and I can not recall ever seeing any RC person doing that.

    45. Re:OUCH by jythie · · Score: 1

      And as a society we hold those who do dangerous stuff and pull it off in high regard. If they die many say it was their 'own stupid fault', but really I think we are just breeding various strains of luck...

    46. Re:OUCH by Art+Challenor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You see an article like this and wonder if there is a deeper motive. This is not really "news" it's sad for the family, but a huge number of people die, unheralded, in accidents every day. So, now look at the helicopter as an unmanned drone. If you can find an excuse to ban helicopters as being dangerous, then you can start to look for ways to put all non-government controlled model aircraft/drones under some sort of control. Even if you can't outright ban them, you can restrict the airspace, make sure that they don't fly anywhere near any location where they may be able to take photographs that embarass the government.

      Maybe I'm overly paranoid, but I'm sure this will lead to calls for bans or some restrictions. It won't be effective this time, or the restrictions will be minor, but next time, or the time after they'll increase until they achieve the government objective of increase control over the people by removing civil liberties and information.

    47. Re:OUCH by jythie · · Score: 1

      I have to say, if I was going to take such a big risk, a flying suit sounds like a LOT more fun then flying a helicopter at my head....

    48. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot: Hot steaming turds for bottom feeders...

    49. Re:OUCH by dougmc · · Score: 4, Informative

      and I can not recall ever seeing any RC person doing that.

      Line judges in R/C pylon races wear helmets or hard hats.

      Pilots usually do not, however -- the risks are not large enough to justify them. That said, this situation shows us that they are not zero.

    50. Re:OUCH by jythie · · Score: 1

      I don't know, there are a lot of people who feel that manned spaceflight is just stupid and pointless risk taking.

    51. Re:OUCH by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Right. It was mom and dad's fault.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    52. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you grieve for all of the kids who starve to death in Africa? Do you grieve for the victims of the constant conflicts in the Middle East?

      Constantly? No, because I'm in a different place and don't know the victims. But when you think of the meaningless loss of innocent life, I don't see how you can do anything *but* grieve.

      What matters if if you know the person or not.

      Well, that's what matters when you determine how much it affects you personally, true.

      It's perfectly acceptable to joke about the death of someone you never knew or even knew of.

      Sure, if you're a massive asshole, unwilling to give the family time to mourn, instead of surrounding them by shouts of "Darwin Awards!". Yes, the guy did something stupid, avoidable, and completely of his own volition. You're kind of a jerk though, if you don't feel enough pity for the family to stop your tongue wagging for a little while.

    53. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well look at it this way.

      We now have evidence that this unarmed radio control drone can be used to kill people standing in a public place.

      Should there or should there not be some kind of regulation on the use of these devices on public property?

    54. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I was thinking BMX bikes.

    55. Re:OUCH by dmacleod808 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because the Federal government threatened to pull back funding for states if they did not up the drinking age to 21.

      --
      There Can Be Only One...
    56. Re:OUCH by xevioso · · Score: 2

      Read the article: “They crash all day long,” said the owner of Brooklyn Hobbies, who gave his name only as Richie. The reasons, he said, generally fall into three categories: The remote sends bad signals, the person does not build the model well, or the pilots — “that’s what they call them, pilots” — try to do a maneuver above their skill level. So it's possible he was trying to do a maneuver...it's also possible the equipment malfunctioned.

    57. Re:OUCH by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You seem to have a funny definition of "directly overhead" and "out of control."

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    58. Re:OUCH by xevioso · · Score: 1

      But you don't know this, which is why you are a sociopath. The equipment could have malfunctioned. You are aware this was a possibility, right?

    59. Re:OUCH by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2

      Ah, but he died doing something he enjoyed. Isn't that the dream of every man?

      Sure, but just not yet.

    60. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your humanism is truly touching and heartwarming.

    61. Re:OUCH by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Was the helicopter over 16oz?

    62. Re:OUCH by kimvette · · Score: 1

      no, other than treating it as manslaughter or assault depending on the result, and follow up with a civil liability suit.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    63. Re:OUCH by thisisnotreal · · Score: 1

      yes. I do too. Agree with you. The last quotes you selected are fine ones.

    64. Re:OUCH by kimvette · · Score: 1

      > (in that if we are going to require registration of other internal combustion engine vehicles, why should an ATV get an exception?)

      Because they do not get driven/ridden on public streets (as a general rule anyhow).

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    65. Re:OUCH by s.petry · · Score: 2

      The article is very clear that it was not an equipment malfunction.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    66. Re:OUCH by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      My dad likes guns, but that doesn't mean that he should engage in stupid practices with it or is any less dead if something happens as a result.

      Died doing something somebody loved, is something people say when the consequences of their own stupidity led to their own demise. I've never heard somebody saying that about a book lover who died reading a book. The main reason being that there's no point, you don't need to rationalize the death.

      I think it's infinitely preferable to dying from something you aren't enjoying - being eaten by a shark, crushed by a python, smushed beneath the vending machine which is tenaciously holding onto your bag of chips and only seems to need a nudge, choking on a mouthful of cockroaches, shot while trying to escape East Berlin so some jerk can get a medal for stopping you, etc.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    67. Re:OUCH by BLKMGK · · Score: 2

      Yeah, this can really tear you up...

      http://www.heliguy.com/nexus/dangers.html

      Check out the one guy who's belly was struck 20ft away when he blew a landing. That is a picture of the bruise 3 days later - owwie! Or the guy who had to have both internal and external stitches when he fired up a copter with the throttle stuck open - not good!

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    68. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basic precautions? The only one that would have really helped would be a helmet, and I can not recall ever seeing any RC person doing that.

      Are you serious? Don't fly near your head. He was doing that intentionally when he died. Check out the video here, he lands on a table a few feet from himself and a friend. Seated, so they can't get away. They both thing it's really cool, but it's totally stupid and lacking the most basic of precautions.

    69. Re:OUCH by s.petry · · Score: 1

      This! Nothing in politics or media happens on accident. It's also never just about money or fame, there are always additional motives.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    70. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the internet, rule #3 begets rule #6.

    71. Re:OUCH by tippe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know how this guy's flying club/park was set up, but at my local flying club, there is a fairly large "no man's land" between where the model aircraft fly and where the pilots are supposed to stand. Sometimes pilots and planes violate this separation (e.g. a pilot crossing the space to retrieve a damaged aircraft, or a plane being taxied through the space on it's way to or from the "runway"), but in general this no man's land is respected by everyone and accidents occur far away from anyone's head. Also, aircraft are never made to cross over the audience or pilot areas (I'm not part of the club so I don't know if this is an enforced rule, or just something everyone follows out of courtesy).

      What this guy does in the TFV (The Featured Video) is totally stupid and reckless, and is just asking for trouble. Not only does he fly the thing over and near a parking lot (basically an audience area), but he flies it within a couple of feet of both himself (sitting down at a table at the end of the video) and another couple of individuals. As one youtube commenter posted, that thing is a flying chainsaw; you just don't fly it that close to anyone's head. This guy was a cocky, stupid individual, and sorry to say, he paid the ultimate price. Again, sorry to say, good thing it was him rather than somebody else. Far from being a freak accident, I bet you this was entirely predictable and also entirely avoidable with a few basic safely measures (and I'm not talking about wearing helmets). Maybe this will serve as a lesson to the others flying at that club, and they'll actually put into place a few basic safety rules to protect both themselves and the audience from this type of thing in the future.

    72. Re:OUCH by Starteck81 · · Score: 1

      quick, lets ban them! think of the children :D

      When I read that I nearly destroyed my work laptop with the water I was drinking.

      --
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    73. Re:OUCH by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Wrap yourself in bubble wrap if you must, not everyone wishes this fate for themselves. This is most certainly not the way I'd want to go out but your reaction would have us all afraid of our own shadows. Life is full of risks, I and many others drove to work in a vehicle weighing several thousand pounds and thought nothing of it but to hear your attitude we should've walked to avoid all chance of risk. Not going to happen...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    74. Re:OUCH by geoskd · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that anyone making jokes about this has no children. To anyone with kids, the thought of something like this happening is simply gut-wrenching. But since relations with the opposite sex are required for procreation, I guess the tasteless jokes and, what's worse, modding up of such, is to be expected here.

      I have kids, and this doesn't bother me as much I might have otherwise thought. I guess its cause my kids are still too young to let them play unsupervised (or with anything dangerous). By 19, however, its sink or swim time...

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    75. Re:OUCH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Lol!!!

      Reminds me of the banning of balls at a school in Ontario because a parent got knocked out by a ball to the head.

      Shit happens. We can't stop the world from spinning because of one incident.

    76. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, I am invoking Rule #11 on this story.

    77. Re:OUCH by ah.clem · · Score: 1

      I will give you the benefit of doubt and assume you have never seen or touched the rotors on a 700-size nitro and have little or no first-hand knowledge of the rotor R/C hobby. I recommend you drop by a hobby shop and run a finger over the LE of even a small, electric rotorcraft. I believe you will be quite surprised by just how sharp it is. In my opinion, calling BS is something you do when you have factual experience to back yourself up, not just opinions; but like I said, that's just my opinion.

      --
      "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
    78. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a flying lawn mower.

    79. Re:OUCH by iksbob · · Score: 2

      They weigh roughly 10-12lbs, this one was a gas turbine, so it likely weighed a little more

      I highly doubt that. Gas turbine engines are very rare in the RC hobby, and quite expensive. The cost of such an engine would exceed the media's quoted price tag of the entire helicopter. Given the expense and typical time invested by the hobbyist, gas turbine helis almost never see 3D flight (acrobatic flight, as the articles describe).
      The most common power system in modern high performance helis is the brushless electric motor, powered by a high-discharge rate 6-10 cell lithium polymer battery pack (30-40 VDC and up to around 300 A). After that, it's 2-stroke piston engines running on glow/nitro fuel (a mixture of methanol, nitromethane and lubricating oil).

    80. Re:OUCH by Garganus · · Score: 2

      Careful, this is NY were are talking about.

      Was the helicopter over 16oz?

      I'd stop and frisk the helicopter to check, but it's a white helicopter and I've suddenly lost interest.

    81. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the sounds of it doing some jackass stunt with the damned thing.

      It sounds like his stunts were hair-raising!

    82. Re:OUCH by The_Wilschon · · Score: 2

      Basic precautions like not being that close to freaking helicopter blades. It's *remote* control for a reason.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    83. Re:OUCH by The_Wilschon · · Score: 4, Funny

      folks who skydive in flying squirrel wingsuits . . . risks of death can be a real turn-on for folks.

      Effing furries.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    84. Re:OUCH by s.petry · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Jokes about this kid getting hurt are about as funny as jokes about the Shuttle Columbia's last re-entry.

      Humor is a method of learning, in addition to being a wonderful coping mechanism. While I am not a fan of certain types of jokes, I personally see nothing wrong with the jokes in this thread. Perhaps you prefer racial jokes, or find something else humorous that others have difficulty with. If you find no humor in anything, you are not really human.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    85. Re:OUCH by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      Saying "feel sorry for his Father" not him, as actor in his own demise.

      Empathy. It's what's for dinner.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    86. Re:OUCH by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Torn groin from a bad landing? I say Mission accompilished, Mr Darwin.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    87. Re:OUCH by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Gas turbine engines are very rare in the RC hobby, and quite expensive."

      Expensive, not so much any more, and rare, not even fucking close. More than half of the RC devices flown by Citrus State Park are gas turbine engines, with the rest being battery pack - no nitromethane anywhere to be found. There's even a guy with an F-16 with freaking functional full-auto airsoft cannons on it. you know when that sucker gets started up, even half a mile away.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    88. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you using kinetic energy = 1/2 * M * V^2 based on the mass at the blade tips?

      How about 1/4 Kg tip mass
      Velocity 175 m/s

      Kinetic energy = 3828 Joules - more energy than most rifles

      More like a flying lawnmower blade

    89. Re:OUCH by s.petry · · Score: 1

      He was not a "child", please save the "for the children" appeals to emotion. He was also not a victim, so save that line of fallacy also. It was an adult who made some poor decisions. Worse, it appears from the article that he had parents that knew and did not discourage those decisions.

      Now if this was a child, and someone drove the RC into that child, there would probably be less humor in the story. Since those first two things are not what happened, you are simply being delusional in your rant against humor.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    90. Re:OUCH by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I feel terrible for his father who witnessed his son get killed in front of him, that's unimaginably terrible. However, the tippe makes a valid point.

      I've attended several R/C fly in's with jet powered planes and helicopters. I've never seen a plane fly over the heads of spectators, ever. When a R/C plane zips by the runway at 200mph (322kph) it's in a direction that when it crashes it doesn't impale / decapitate or otherwise injure spectators.

      Sadly this will end up being mentioned as a cautionary Darwinian tale.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    91. Re:OUCH by iksbob · · Score: 1

      This.
      As much a tragedy as it was, he was asking for it. None of the heli fliers in our club (likely the one that hosted the DE event mentioned in the article) take those sorts of risks with personal safety. Risk the heli? Sure... You need to push yourself in order to improve, and it gives the crowd a thrill. However, the thrills and entertainment come to a screeching halt when someone gets hurt.
      My best guess is this kid was a budding adrenaline junky, and got his jollies by putting himself in harm's way. Unfortunately, it seems the overstepping of his limits overlapped with his adrenaline habit.

    92. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He was, and it was well executed, at that.

    93. Re:OUCH by ThreeKelvin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Kinetic energy is 1/2 * m * v^2, so using your numbers gives ~5195 joules. It's actually a lot of energy, about the same as a car going at walking speed, delivered as you say, at a knifes edge.

      They'll easily chop a man in half if the rotors don't break first.

    94. Re:OUCH by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's actually not that paranoid. The FAA has been working on guidelines for unmanned aircraft for the last year. The things people call r/c aircraft when you do it for fun, drones when the government does it for tracking/blowing up people. So far the rules they've come up with have been pretty lax (no rules or limitation on flights under 400 feet as long as it's kept away from populated areas and regular aircraft). But some people are opposed to the current rules and want greater restrictions or outright bans. Fatalities from r/c aircraft are nothing new, but this is the first time I've seen one get this much press. I haven't seen anything unusual or notable about this particular death compared to previous r/c accidents, yet for some reason the story has gone national.

    95. Re:OUCH by Xoltri · · Score: 2

      It should be noted that the table landing video was a different model, it was a small quad copter and did not pose nearly the same risk as the one that killed him did.

      --
      -Xoltri
    96. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do want to see it. Liveleak and other similar sites prove it. People are like that. Pull your head out of the sand.

    97. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was not flying a gas turbine powered r/c heli. He was flying a piston powered heli, which burns a fuel mixture of ethanol and nitro methane. A turbine powered heli will run about 5k on the cheap side, and upwards of 8k or more for a scale model. I have flown these things for over 20yrs. Posted anon as not to undo previous modding, no karma for me.

    98. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try reading the article.

      I know, it's too much to ask most /. readers, but the article clearly states what happened.

    99. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is your only, sure, but not necessarily if it is just your first. The guy made a habit of violating basic safety principals and paid the price for his lack of respect of what he was doing and his lack of responsibility. His death is on him. I have a lot of pity for his family and friends that have to suffer as a result of his bad decisions. It is still tragic, but if it is also his own damn fault for not taking proper precautions, then I don't feel bad for him personally.

    100. Re:OUCH by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      Doing the math on the rotor blades, .325kg * 175m/s * 0.5 = ~28.4 the tips carry approximately 28 joules of energy assuming they don't separate from the rotor head.

      Kinetic energy is (1/2)(m)(v^2), not v. So it works out to 4977 Joules. More than twice the energy of an AK-47 round.

    101. Re:OUCH by PRMan · · Score: 1

      And similar to this guy, the wing suit people fly within 3 feet of a rocky mountain face.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    102. Re:OUCH by iksbob · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I wonder if it has something to do with CA air quality regulations or perhaps economic demographic? I have seen a grand total of two turbine engines at our club's airfield (very likely the location of the DE event mentioned in the article), one of which was in a heli (at said event no less).

    103. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a little correction:

      kinetic energy is T = 0.5*m*v, so in this case it is 0.5*0.325*(175m/s) = 4976 Joule, which is a lot. For example, 1000W for 4.976 seconds.

    104. Re:OUCH by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The earliest reports said that the father was there, and are still be repeated. Other reports that came later said the father came to the scene after first responders, but was removed from the scene by the police. The later reports included a photo of the police talking to him.

    105. Re:OUCH by Real1tyCzech · · Score: 1

      Watch his YouTube vid. He didn't make this mistake once, he makes it repeatedly...almost killing himself and his friend in the linked video. It leads one to believe he totally ignored any and all risks of operating a high-speed flying chainsaw.

      Most operators know to make sure the device is completely inactive before going anywhere near it. Making it land directly in front of you where you have effectively *zero* ability to take cover should it not stop is a pretty damned expensive game of Russian roulette.

    106. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      add a '^2' to the velocity, somehow it was lost

    107. Re:OUCH by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Some reports based on interviews with friends and family indicated that his father introduced him to the hobby. Clearly, he did not effectively learn and/or respect basic safety rules.

    108. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complete bull. He never said the guy couldn't do his stunts safely. He could have. He could have done them all with nearly total safety for him and his audiences. Several flying clubs exist *because* of this capability.

      There are several very simple precautions one can take to properly use these remote-control chainsaws without risk to anyone.

      Rule#1: Don't operate them within the audience location.
      Rule#2: Don't operate them near yourself or fellow operators.

      These are *remote* for a reason. They are not intended to be in operation anywhere near you or your audience.

    109. Re:OUCH by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      That is why there are important safety rules like not flying it over people including yourself. He was doing a stunt that is reckless. If the equipment malfunctioned, that is actually an expected result of flying these things. They do malfunction. That is one reason for not doing "stunts" like the one he put on youtube where he flies it over himself, stops the rotor, and then starts it again when it is right over his head falling at him. Reporters claim that this was the same stunt witnesses described him doing when he recklessly slaughtered himself.

    110. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "running through my head"

      Nice!

    111. Re:OUCH by Cigarra · · Score: 0

      Because he lived in a police state.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    112. Re:OUCH by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Throw an ArduPilot in one of these aircraft and you fly on rails.

      I have a Titian mini flybarless (i.e. impossible to control without electronic stabilization by anyone but the best of the best) and its a rock thanks to an ArduPilot.

      I still think you are 100% correct about it though. The landing on a table is something I do with a 2 ounce toy I bought from the mall, not something I do with my actual aircraft. Again, 300-400mph rotor tip speeds should be enough for anyone to get the picture.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    113. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You basically fly a high-horsepower rotating sword directly at yourself for no reason

      Uh, Wut?

      It's a RC helicoptor. You never "fly it directly at yourself". Nor does the article state that doing so was part of a trick that the kid was doing.

      Your use of the term "deadly helicopter" is only marginally true. I mean, your cell phone is deadly if you try to swallow it. You could say you drive around in a deadly car. God knows enough people die in them yearly. Or you could say people making their own radios are working with deadly electricity. People digging holes in their back yard are working with deadly shovels. You know, cause you can kill a man with it.

      Enjoying RC helicopters is not a reason for a Darwin award nomination. If it were so, EVERYONE that dies in freak accidents would be nominated. Do you expect everyone to live in plastic bubble-wrap?

      Now, RC helicopters can be dangerous. They can get out of your control, or face interference, or you can simply confuse yaw with pitch and send it the wrong way. And that is in much the same way, if not exactly the same way, that people screw up behind the steering wheel of a car.

      There is zero legitimate reason to fly a deadly helicopter at yourself just to do a trick.

      More or less correct. Any such trick would be unnecessarily dangerous. This is in no way applicable to the story at hand and is not what Roman Pirozek was doing at the time of his death. You're an asshole for trying to condemn RC flight.

    114. Re:OUCH by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      So ... your club is an AMA member ... thats not a requirement. I know of no city where they have actually bothered to enforce any sort of issue like this. Raleigh NC certainly doesn't, though I wished it did.

      Card carrying AMA member here.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    115. Re:OUCH by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      So bother to read the article ... where it stated ... clearly ... the aircraft was a gas turbine.

      They also ALWAYS run a higher rotor speed due to turbine lag making it practically useless to use throttle in combination with higher pitch requirements.

      You have no clue what you're talking about. The most common heli is still and has been for the last 5 years or more, a raptor 30 with a 32-50 sized glow plug engine.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    116. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then I read that one of his tricks was to fly the helicopter close to his head.

      Uh, where did you read that?

    117. Re:OUCH by jones_supa · · Score: 1, Funny

      Let me guess, you were controlling a toy radio helicopter while reading Slashdot and the parent's comment made you laugh which caused the copter to crash on your monitor and keyboard.

    118. Re:OUCH by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      damnit, forgot to square the speed! I knew something was wrong with those numbers.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    119. Re:OUCH by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      19 years old is still very much a child. Anyone who doesn't understand that is most likely still in their 20s.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    120. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so if the government goes unfunded the states can do whatever they want?

    121. Re:OUCH by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Yeah, exactly, he was doing the stunt to entertain. And he's entertaining. So what?

    122. Re:OUCH by cod3r_ · · Score: 0

      this one is also funny

    123. Re:OUCH by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      I don't fly 'at a park'.

      I don't fly toys.

      I fly small aircraft. The field I fly in is 30 miles outside the city, next to a lake at the local national park headquarters that requires a key to get within a mile of the airfield.. I've got 2.5 million in bodily injury coverage and a million in property damage coverage. (Standard AMA insurance coverage)

      We throw people the fuck out of the field if they do dangerous shit intentionally, and the club grounded me until they felt that the accident was truly a rare accident and not an indication of a systemic problem with the way I build my aircraft. They would throw me out just as fast if it appeared that I was lax or lazy and that lead to this incident occurring.

      If I intentionally flew over the flight line, I would have been immediately banned from the club.

      This isn't a joke to me douche bag, and I'm not flying one of the air hogs you bought from walmart.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    124. Re:OUCH by s.petry · · Score: 1

      You are as delusional as the person I responded to, and repeating the same fallacy. I would agree that at 19 he was not "wise" since wisdom requires knowledge. He may not have been fully mature, because maturity comes with wisdom. Neither of those things make him a child. Painting him as a child is delusion. If you fell for the same delusion with Trayvon Martin, shame on you for being unable to spot and defend yourself against fallacy.

      Repeating a fallacy over and over will never make the argument rational or logical.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    125. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you fly, you don't know much... the heli he landed on the table in the video is a small multirotor. the heli that killed him was a massive Trex 700 aerobatic heli, totally different beast. The thing he landed on the table could not injure.

    126. Re:OUCH by Bigby · · Score: 1

      And it is not illegal for those under 21 to drink in all States. In Ohio, your parents may permit you drink in your household. In some states, your parents can compel a restaurant to serve you alcohol.

      http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/YouthIssues/Most-States-in-US-Permit-Drinking-Under-the-Age-of-21.html

    127. Re:OUCH by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      We have had evidence for many years that fists can be used to kill people standing in a public place.

      Should there or should there not be some kind of regulation on the use of these appendages on public property?

      I dunno, "Don't kill, maim, injure, or put people at risk for killing, maiming or injury" seems to be a standard we already have plenty of laws about. Seems those should cover it pretty well.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    128. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now he's in Heaven or Hell - so he still does.

    129. Re:OUCH by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      He could make a good candidate for a Darwin Award.

    130. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been flying (RC and free flight) for most of my life and a long time member of the AMA (http://www.modelaircraft.org/). This has been going on as long as I've been involved.

      These accidents happen (with a fatality) every few years.

    131. Re:OUCH by cusco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've done lots of stupid things that could have killed me. Unlike this guy, I try to learn from them and NOT do them again. I certainly don't make a habit of them and put my stupidity on YouTube for the whole world to witness.

      He got lucky, a lot of times. Luck doesn't last. This was the time it ran out, he could have lost his hand, killed a bystander, or sliced his gut open instead of getting hit in the head.

      He'll probably win the Darwin Award for September, and deservedly so.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    132. Re:OUCH by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Notice i got flamebait for daring to point that out? What happened to personal responsibility folks, the guy was 19, had years of flying these things and had enough $$$ to blow over $2k on a fricking toy? he had to know how insanely powerful that motor was and more than enough reason to show proper respect to the obviously VERY powerful "toy".

      Let me ask THIS question of those that modded me down...would you be showing this much sympathy for somebody that was twirling a gun and shot themselves? Because that is EXACTLY what we have here, a jackass that was showing off, not taking any precautions, and took his dumb ass out of the gene pool. I am supposed to feel bad about this? I don't feel bad for the idiot that plays with a cellphone and walks into traffic, don't feel bad for the idiot that blows his head off by cleaning a gun without even bothering to see if there is a round in it first, and I'm not gonna feel bad for somebody that takes a $2k+ gas motor with VERY sharp blades attached and then kills their fool self with it by acting like a moron and doing "stunts" while having the thing directly over them. Stupid is as stupid does folks..

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    133. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy hell that's insane. What a way to go :(

      Hope they caught it on video for YouTube.

    134. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lost all credibility when you say 'prayers'

    135. Re:OUCH by cusco · · Score: 1

      In Texas they were looking at banning R/C helicopters that carried cameras after a non-profit took pictures of a 'river of blood' outside a slaughterhouse that drained into a public waterway. Don't know how that ever came out.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    136. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That video is from a little QUAD it would be lucky to cut you if it ran in to you.

    137. Re:OUCH by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey dude, before you get on your high horse, how about a little common sense? It was VERY much about personal responsibility because he was NOT killed by an accident, the chopper did NOT malfunction, the moron was sitting in a chair and having it land next to him when surprise! he got too close and took his own head off.

      So don't give us this "it could happen to anybody" bullshit because unlike this moron most of us? Not gonna be stupid enough to try to land a chopper with sharp whirling blades next to us while we park out fat behinds in a chair. it is one thing to have an accident, its another thing entirely to die strictly from a case of the stupids, this is firmly in the latter!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    138. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in MA that would definitely happen. As it is Nannychusetts now requires all dirt bikes and ATVs to be registered (even if used only on your own private property!) and no one under 16 may operate any such vehicles at any time (even under guardian supervision), except to train within 21 days of a sanctioned competition.

      ATV registration is 99% about revenue, lots of states do that. I'm not aware of any states that require a license to operate one.

      http://www.atvsafety.gov/state/massachusetts.html
      This page says you have to be 10 to ride on your own land under parental supervision... yah, a little nannystateish... I got my first minibike in the 2nd grade up in Maine.

    139. Re:OUCH by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 0

      Lots of people act dumb and don't die.

    140. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An interesting comment, just a slight correction on your math.
      You forgot to square the speed, the actual result is almost 5000 joule.
      This is not far from the energy of a low power bullet.

    141. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Survival instincts exist for a reason.

      Things don't neatly fall into a 100% chance of death and 100% safe categories. Choosing to go out the door every day either requires acknowledging that a small amount of risk is worth the benefit of actually having a life. Choosing to travel by car or to do various other activities add a little more to those risks. Where people draw the line exactly depends on how risk adverse they are (and how good they are at judging risks...). You could still have someone die from an activity that thousands others do repeatedly without dying, and that isn't necessarily a flagrant disregard for survival instinct. Besides, what is the point of surviving if you don't do anything?

    142. Re:OUCH by Alioth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It doesn't change the fact that it was (almost certainly) his fault. Just because it sucks to get killed, it doesn't absolve you of the responsibility especially when you personally control most of the risks.

      I fly radio controlled helicopters. A 700-size electric heli is not a toy (and it's not people trying not to be thought of as being "childish" when RC modellers insist their models are not toys) but something that carries quite a lot of energy. The blade tip speeds on a typical 700 size (nitro or electric) that's set up for aggressive 3D is on the order of 400 km/h. They are made from carbon fibre (with a metal weight in the leading edge) and must be respected enormously. Deaths are very uncommon (I think this is only the second death caused by a radio controlled helicopter) but injuries are rather less common and the majority of them are because someone didn't take proper precautions. Only the person with the transmitter is responsible for this. He was the person with the transmitter, he was the commander, he was responsible however much it sucks. It wasn't merely bad luck. It wasn't "luck" that he was flying the heli close enough to where he was standing he couldn't get out the way if things went pear shaped. That was his own, deliberate choice.

      The radio manufacturers go to great lengths to try and prevent radio problems leading to runaway models (signal integrity checking and failsafes). Component failures are pretty rare but they do happen. But all of these things won't hurt you if you take the simple precaution of flying the model far enough away from you that if everything goes tits up, you can get out of the way.

      Yeah it sucks that he's dead, especially for his family and I have a great deal of sympathy for them but at the same time it is most likely he was personally responsible for his own demise. He was the one with the transmitter, he was the one commanding the model to fly close to where he was in the first place.

    143. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe sometimes it should be about assigning fault, even if it is clearly a specific person's fault. Shit happens, and sometimes that really sucks regardless of how big or small of a risk took when they failed their saving throw.

    144. Re:OUCH by Alioth · · Score: 2

      I have huge sympathy for his family.

      However, he was the one with the transmitter, he was the one solely responsible for flying that model close enough to where he was standing he couldn't get out the way when it went wrong. Even if the equipment malfunctioned, there is no failure mode that makes an RC heli chase you down and kill you - an equipment malfunction will only take you out if you chose to fly the heli close enough to where you were standing you can't get out the way before it hits you.

      I fly radio controlled helis, I have a 700 size electric (rotor span of about 1.7 metres) and I have enormous respect for the deadly amount of energy the rotor system carries - and because of that I won't have it fly dangerously close to myself or anyone else because that's how equipment failures result in serious injury. Keep it far enough away that you can get out the way if the radio should fail in such a manner it suddenly flies at you and you don't get injured. Only the guy holding the transmitter is responsible for that, no one else.

      It's tragic he got killed, but it doesn't change the fact he was flying it too close to where he was standing.

    145. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe sometimes it shouldN'T be about assigning fault. Like the fault for that typo, which was the fault of my keyboard, OS, Slashdot, ISP, coworkers, and anyone else that is not me...

    146. Re:OUCH by tolydude · · Score: 1

      He was a child to his parents. He would have remained a child to his parents into his old age. Children should not die before their parents, not matter their age. The fact that you cannot grasp these simple truths leaves me completely stumped.

    147. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is incorrect, it was not a gas turbine model. It was piston powered.

    148. Re:OUCH by Stickerboy · · Score: 1

      Lots of people act dumb and don't die.

      Not the original poster, but yet again, the propensity of any given person (you, me, this guy in Brooklyn) to act dumb and do really stupid things should be proportionally inverse to their ability or desire to engage in activities that can hurt themselves and/or others.

      Hairyfeet is 100% correct, and what I am most thankful for out of this completely avoidable tragedy is that no innocent bystanders got hurt with this guy.

      Yes, we can all die in the next minute, but if a person dies while doing something completely forseeable and avoidable such as driving drunk, juggling running chainsaws, or doing stunts with remote control helicopters right over your own head, there is no guilt on anyone else's part, and there is very little sympathy, except for the people that person left behind that have to deal with the aftermath.

      --
      Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    149. Re:OUCH by operagost · · Score: 1

      And this is why we don't let de facto temperance lobbyists like MADD dictate federal policy. Once of the worst failures of the Reagan administration (and I'm someone who actually liked Reagan).

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    150. Re:OUCH by khallow · · Score: 1

      We now have evidence that this unarmed radio control drone can be used to kill people standing in a public place.

      Well, maybe we should make killing people illegal then? I don't have real strong feelings about this, one way or another, but that sounds bad and we probably shouldn't do things that sound bad.

    151. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sdfgls qwkjklkjshd hlkjhlkjdhlkj lljknljkd ljkhdsql jklhkjhdf xcjkhsdkj jkljhtrdns asjdkjh..

      I wouldn't dare make that comment in person. I would risk breaking my jaw, or worse, summoning something from the deep.

    152. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just can't avoid baitin' the atheists, huh?

    153. Re:OUCH by Tugrik · · Score: 2

      In the linked video he's flying a QAV400 -- a small quadrotor that uses anything from 7" to 11" props, in a hand-held sized frame. While the propellers can still cause lacerations, they're far smaller and lighter than a full RC helicopter (especially the kind mentioned that killed him). Landing a few feet from your face is still not wise, though.

      There's definitely a question of scale to be considered in all this debate. Someone screwing up and dropping a lightweight A.R.Drone atop someone's head is a world of difference from that idiot covering the bull run with the monster octo-rotor dangling 20k of video equipment. I fly some of the ultralight models that can barely hoist up a tiny GoPro camera. While the prop tips can still cause some road rash they're not going to be lopping anybody's head off. Yet I'm sure I'm going to get regulated against / yelled at / sued etc just for owning it, thanks to the flying-lawnmower "look at how much money and power I can put in the air" mega-aerial-video types.

      The RC community needs to work on smaller, lighter and safer models for purposes of filming. The flying dSLR cranes and high-power-acro-but-it-can-film-too models need to stop being near people.

    154. Re:OUCH by iksbob · · Score: 1

      So bother to read the article ... where it stated ... clearly ... the aircraft was a gas turbine.

      Where is that? Which of the two articles, and in what paragraph? I see no reference to gas turbines what so ever. In fact, the WSJ article has quoted the deceased's post that he was "breaking in some new packs i just got", referring to LiPo main battery packs.

    155. Re:OUCH by lgw · · Score: 1

      And so ... what? You would prefer a consequence-free world? Where you can be a child forever, and never really face the consequences of the choices you make in life? Let someone else make the hard choices for you? Sadly, many "adults" do want just that.

      It is good and just and right when the wise prosper while fools suffer. This guy was a fool, and he suffered the completely predictable consequences of his own choices. This was not a man who made all the right choices, but was cheated by fate. He wasn't incredibly unlucky; he was unlucky by a normal, expected amount.

      We don't all do things this silly. Seriously. There's even a word for people who don't act recklessly in the face of obvious risks: "adults".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    156. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its Cal. I fly here in Cal also - I dont/wont join a club, I go out to a friends land in the east bay and fly my 60" wingspan Dr 1 and 73" wingspan Sopwith Pup - both gas motors. You can fly an electric pretty much anywhere in Cal, but using a gas RC engine invokes all kinds of regulations, so I dont even bother with clubs.

    157. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people use "child" and "kid" to refer to offspring, regardless of age...

    158. Re:OUCH by s.petry · · Score: 1

      By your logic, everyone is a child since everyone had parents. The fact that you can not grasp such simple rational thinking, and insist on repeating a fallacy, leaves me completely stumped.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    159. Re:OUCH by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 0

      Do you think of the brain as some idealistic device for applying free will, rather than just another organ of the body?

      Do you think that anyone who does something this stupid, or more stupid, ends up dead?

    160. Re:OUCH by lgw · · Score: 1

      It's a very strange world we live in when /.'s resident hippie gets modded down for advocating personal responsibility, I must say.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    161. Re:OUCH by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I noticed, and if I had mod points I would surely correct. The problem here is that idiots get mod points as often as intelligent people.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    162. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Died doing something somebody loved, is something people say when the consequences of their own stupidity led to their own demise.

      Or they were just doing something with risks less than taking a drive to the grocery store and got really unlucky. Taking a little risk for gain is not stupidity. It is only stupidity if you misjudge or don't understand the risk. Even taking a large risk for gain can be arguable depending on how much gain and how risk adverse the person is.

    163. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm a victim of my own stupidity flying a RC helicopter; yet, I was lucky.

      In the late 80s (or 1990) I was flying my heli with a 4 foot (1.33 meter) rotor-span and attempting to get it to hover with a trainer attached. The trainer: Think of four metal rods in a giant X pattern (that spanned as far as the rotors) with tennis balls at the end of each rods attached to the bottom of the heli. I was attempting to get the landing skid training balls to "dance". It made the "footprint" of the heli much larger.

      The idea was to get enough control to basically make the heli "dance" at ground level until you could get it a few inches of the ground without it tipping or actually flying off.

      The controller slipped from my left hand - the throttle was thrown into "Full Throttle" position. Up it went - about 10 feet up! I immediately threw the throttle into idle. It came crashing back down....into me. I barely had time to get my hands up to protect my head and body from the main rotor. It hit my arm below the shoulder, then at the elbow, then at my hip, then at my thigh, knee, and finally calf.

      I was *very* lucky! With the reduction of power it didn't cut into my flesh. I do NOT bruise easily AT ALL; but, this thing bruised the hell out of me and I couldn't sleep on my right side for 2 weeks.

      It was all my fault. Yes, I should have been standing further away. Incedentally, I was about 19 or 20 at the time, too.

    164. Re:OUCH by unixisc · · Score: 1

      It isn't that - it's that the people w/ the mod points normally use them in articles where they have next to nothing to post themselves. So if the people who agreed w/ Hairy are here posting, they couldn't use those points in his defense even if they had them.

    165. Re:OUCH by Nov8tr · · Score: 0
      --
      I'm old, not dead. Well that's my 2 cents worth, your mileage may vary. I say what I think, not what you want to hear.
    166. Re:OUCH by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I'll meet you in the middle, I believe it's both. I have seen obvious shills marked as +5 insightful as often as I have seen valid positions being marked as trolls and flame bait.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    167. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'd obliterate you all in your faces if there was a way. Be careful what you wish for.

    168. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention parts can and do fail at any time on these things. Not being 100% safely away from them at all times is temping death. IIRC, there was a guy who cut his throat with one a few years back. He didn't survive either.

    169. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NPR was just doing a similar story about folks who skydive in flying squirrel wingsuits. They say there's no thrill like flying above the earth at well over 100MPH. It is also implied and understood there is no such thing as a do-over either. Life is inherently risky, while risks of death can be a real turn-on for folks.

      As a skydiver, I feel the need to point out the difference between BASE jumping and skydiving. I wouldn't disagree about the no margin of error for the BASE version, which is what that NPR article is about. Out of an airplane, at 10,000 ft and away from mountains, the wingsuits represent an increased risk, but not the same level of "fuck up and you're dead" risk.

      Not arguing against your overall point, but there's a perception that skydiving is far more dangerous than it actually is. I don't know much at all about BASE, but what I've heard indicates it's actually even more dangerous than most people believe.

    170. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what Meta Moderating is for. Feel free to correct the idiots with mod points!

    171. Re:OUCH by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      People do all kinds of dangerous stuff without "real" justification. Taking a drive nowhere in particular, paragliding, skydiving, scubadiving. We do things that entertain us, that thrill us. Some of the most fun I had was riding my bike against traffic in NYC.

      I think this Darwin award business here is a bit poor in taste. And I wonder whether you'll think any less of yourself the next time you do anything even remotely dangerous.

    172. Re:OUCH by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

      And similarly to this guy, you can wind up dead doing dangerous activities you love.

      And just to be clear, there is nothing wrong with people dieing doing the things they want to do. Whether it's rock climbing, wing suit gliding, piloting, surfing, etc., you should have the right to engage in dangerous activities. With minors, its a bit different obviously, but this guy was 19. A bit young but he is still an adult.

      That being said, I think there are way too much uncontrollable variables in RC helicopter flying to wiz one by your head. It would be off the acceptable risk radar for me personally, but I am not going to set that line for others. Now, if the guy took out an innocent bystander, that's a different story.

    173. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like an R/C is in the direct visual control of the operator.

      A drone is likely more autonomous and can venture farther that the operator can see directly.
          He may still be controlling it, but his awareness of what's around the drone may be limited.
            If such a craft is in the same airspace with another craft, it's not clear what provides separation.
                    (Normal VFR rules don't work unless the craft gets smart enough to 'see'.)

      Some hobby folks are making craft that are autonomous, but I think there should be called drones.
          They may have the same VFR separation issues. But to date, they are under the radar.

    174. Re:OUCH by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Irony, AC is your name.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    175. Re:OUCH by PrimalChrome · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you meant to say a 90 size nitro or a 700 size electric? The leading edges on those blades (CF, wood, or fiberglass) are not particularly sharp...but the trailing edges can be. The danger is in the speed of the tip of the blade when you're running high headspeed to perform 3D maneuvers like tic-tocs or chaos. Yes, I have first hand experience with everything from smaller 450 size electrics to a 90 size Fury.

    176. Re:OUCH by PrimalChrome · · Score: 1

      Yeah...and every SCUBA accident I read about they talk about his tank of 'oxygen'. Reporters don't have a clue what they're talking about and "gas turbine" sounds much more ominous than "glow", now doesn't it? Just off that tidbit, which do you think he chose?

    177. Re:OUCH by tftp · · Score: 0

      a non-profit took pictures of a 'river of blood' outside a slaughterhouse that drained into a public waterway. Don't know how that ever came out.

      Nothing should ever come out of it. You can drink that blood. Otherwise, if you are so concerned, you need to take care of all other life in that river first - and that life (land animals, birds, fishes, and plankton) not only bleeds into the water.

    178. Re:OUCH by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? Don't fly near your head.

      Agreed. Fly near someone else's.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    179. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's infinitely preferable to dying from something you aren't enjoying - being eaten by a shark, crushed by a python,

      ...having the top of your head cut off.

    180. Re:OUCH by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Pull your head out of the sand.

      Unless you're the star of the article. If so, just pull out as much of it as you can find.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    181. Re:OUCH by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      2nd grade which time?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    182. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up with skeet shooting and I'm a bit bothered by the way it sounds like your hobby doesn't self enforce safety standards comparable to those used by target shooters.

      A loaded gun is only ever pointed downrange. An unloaded gun is never allowed to point towards a person. These rules were always absolute. Regardless of any mechanical failure that might happen there was never any possibility of someone being accidentally shot so long as those rules were properly followed.

      If you've only barely been able to maintain the safety of spectators in the event of mechanical failure then you're doing something wrong. I would venture to say that you're flying too close to the spectators if you've had the issues you say you've had.

    183. Re:OUCH by jcgam69 · · Score: 2

      The TFV does NOT show the incident pilot flying a helicopter FPV a few feet from his face. Note at the end of the video he reaches up to turn off the camera almost immediately after landing. Large helicopters take up to a minute for the rotor to spin down. Also the heli that killed him had a rotor span of 600 mm, so he wouldn't have been able to reach the camera. In this video he was flying a multi-copter, which use much smaller propeller blades that stop almost immediately.

    184. Re:OUCH by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      Holy shit! That is just plain crazy. That must be some strong velcro holding the back of his suit together...

    185. Re:OUCH by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you wouldn't say it to their faces, don't fucking say it at all.

      Yeah! And if you wouldn't put your name to it, don't say that either!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    186. Re:OUCH by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have huge sympathy for his family.

      So whose fault is it that he didn't learn to respect his life?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    187. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet if he had half a mind he wouldn't do it again...

    188. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the product page for the model listed in the articles and from his videos, it is clearly an electric.

    189. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What this guy does in the TFV (The Featured Video) is totally stupid and reckless, and is just asking for trouble.

      In fairness, whether he was reckless elsewhere, one can't judge from that video.

      The link is misleading because most people will assume the video was shot on the same device that caused the accident- it wasn't. The "Qav500" referred to in the title is a "quadcopter" with four small blades that supposedly isn't remotely as dangerous as the large model helicopter (with a single, weighted blade) that apparently caused the accident.

      From a YouTube comment by "slembcke":-

      No, he was killed by a much much larger helicopter. This one is a toy in comparison. (Think one big 6 foot, lead weighted rotor vs 4, slow 6 inch, lightweight ones) Things at that scale are considered "micro". Comparing it to a chainsaw is ridiculous. Implying that he's reckless for flying it like that is either insensitive or uninformed.

    190. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're talking about the video linked in the summary, that's misleading. The device in the accident was apparently a model helicopter with a single, large and very heavy blade, whereas the linked video was shot on a much, much lighter "quadcopter".

    191. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He died doing what he loved, if you're gonna go, that's the way to do it, instead of fading away in some nondescript nursing home.

    192. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faults only apply if the person making them can learn from them.

      Otherwise, the person is just plain unlucky.

    193. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for the clarification. I have tried my hand at Mid-sized 3D R/C Helicopters and seen the bigger ones fly. And I just couldn't imagine that the footage would be so staple.

    194. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yiffing furries.

      FTFY

    195. Re:OUCH by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

      While I generally agree with you on the point of personal responsibility, I think all of us have done REALLY stupid things in our lives that could have gotten us killed. To be honest, if you haven't, you haven't really lived anyway.
      They just happened not to in our cases.
      So I may agree he was to blame, I'm not going to rub it in.

    196. Re: OUCH by crazyninjamonkey4 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. People don't stop to think that someone with flying experience wouldn't do such things as are in the vid with a massive heli

    197. Re:OUCH by bmo · · Score: 1

      "Jokes about this kid getting hurt are about as funny as jokes about the Shuttle Columbia's last re-entry"

      Q: Did you know that Christa McAuliffe was blue eyed?
      A: One blew left and one blew right.

      Q: What were Christa McAuliffe's last words?
      A: "What's this button do?"

      Q: What were Christa McAuliffe's last words to her husband?
      A: "You feed the kids - I'll feed the fish."

      Q: What was the Shuttle's last transmission?
      A: "I said BUD LITE!"

      Q: What does NASA stand for?
      A1: Need Another Seven Astronauts
      A2: Need Another Shuttle Also

      Q: Did you know that NASA has a new space drink?
      A: Ocean Spray - It was their second choice because they couldn't get 7-UP.

      Q: What do Playtex tampon users and Christa McAuliffe have in common?
      A: They both should have stayed on the pad.

      Q: What does a sea lion, the space shuttle and Tylenol have in common?
      A: They're all looking for a tight seal.

      Q: How many people will fit in a Florida Volkswagen?
      A: Four in the seats and seven in the ashtray.

      Q: On future shuttle missions, why will one of the astronauts have to be a naval officer?
      A: So when they decide to use it as an experimental submarine, they'll have a rated officer onboard.

      Q: What do Christa McAuliffe and Donna Rice have in common.
      A: They both went down on the challenger.

      Q: Did you hear that they are sending up another teacher on the next
      shuttle mission?
      A: She's going to be a substitute.

      Q:Why did the NASA engineers want to delay the Challenger launch.
      A:They wanted to wait for the Fourth of July.

      New Ones

      Q:What goes up and doesn't come down?

      A:Columbia

      Q: Why couldn't the Columbia crew escape?

      A: Nasa couldn't afford an escape system and a Blaupunk stereo system for the cockpit.

      Q;What was the last transmission from Columbia?
      A; "I can see my house from here?"

      Q:What does the Columbia crash and Ted Bundy have in common?
      A:They both left bodies in four states.

      They found Columbia's flight recorder. Analysis of determined that the Challenger and Columbia crashes are connected. The shuttles are blowing up in alphabetical order.

      Two farmers in Texas were having a conversation:
      Bob: "Did ya see the Shuttle blow up?"
      Charlie:"Hell, yes!!"
      Bob: "Didja get any on ya?"

      Q: What should you do if you find a piece of the Space Shuttle Columbia?
      A: Sell it on eBay.

      Q: Why aren't NASA engineers good at crossword puzzles?
      A:They couldn't get seven down.

      They just found a penis in a field in Texas. They think it is a shuttle cock.

      Q: What doe NASA stand for?
      A: Need Another Shuttle Again.

      Q:Why can't the republican's keep politics out of the Columbia investigation?
      A:They keep blaming it on the left wing!

      Q: What did the crew of Columbia miss while they were in orbit?
      A: The Runway.

      Nyeah.

      --
      BMO

    198. Re:OUCH by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      He was 19, an adult, and apparently had many, many hours of previous experience.

      Sadly, 19 only makes one an adult by laws to which biology does not adhere.

    199. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in MA that would definitely happen. As it is Nannychusetts now requires all dirt bikes and ATVs to be registered (even if used only on your own private property!) and no one under 16 may operate any such vehicles at any time (even under guardian supervision), except to train within 21 days of a sanctioned competition.

      I see it now: all RC devices are now required to be registered and may not be operated by minors (even under guardian supervision) unless within one week of a sanctioned event.

      Thankfully I don't live in People's Republik of Nannychusetts any more. I know NYC can be pretty draconian but they don't compare to the insanity of Nannychusetts, sugary drink ban notwithstanding.

      I believe that is pretty country wide, I think PA, also has such a law banning anyone under 16 from riding a dirt bike and ATV. Not only that but even if your riding it on private (more notable and laughable is while your on private) or public property and under the influence or alcohol or drugs you can be arrested for DUI/DWI.

      The kid should have known better then to be flying it at himself, what is disappointing are the people that fell sorry for his father or family. All though I never realized that the blades were that destructive, I'd figure they would be strong enough to fly but designed to break.

    200. Re:OUCH by RedHackTea · · Score: 1

      You're right, that is one heli way to go!
      In all seriousness though, that sucks, and at least he died fulfilling his passion.

      --
      The G
    201. Re:OUCH by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      We have jokes like What is a Rednecks last word "Hey Billy Bob!, Watch This!"...

      I resemble that remark, you insensitive clod!

    202. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing the math on the rotor blades, .325kg * 175m/s * 0.5 = ~28.4 the tips carry approximately 28 joules of energy assuming they don't separate from the rotor head.

      I guess you failed for physics exam, didn't you? Look at your formula carefully, and tell us what you think is wrong with it.

    203. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got the name wrong.

      The correct name for the state where you used to live
      is TAXachusetts.

      And up in New Hampshire where I used to live, we called
      all you motherfuckers MASSHOLES. We called you that
      because an alarmingly high percentage of you fucks were
      assholes. But it was entertaining to watch you idiots try to
      drive in snow on the way to try to ski ( most of you couldn't
      ski worth a damn ) in Vermont.

                                                                                            - North Country Fuehrer

    204. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I fly toys. The one I own is probably a lot bigger and more expensive than yours because it seats two people. I don't see the need to defend or justify my hobby by trying to act like it is more serious or for some grander purpose than entertainment and enjoyment. With apologies if you are one of the few people that can make a living with your small aircraft or use it as a tool for a larger purpose other than having fun.

    205. Re:OUCH by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      You seem to be concluding that we shouldn't lecture about personal responsibility because that won't give him another chance.

      Calling it luck or saying "we could all die at some point" isn't going to give him another chance either, so I don't see how your conclusion follows from your premise.

    206. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting closer. The blades are rotating, so not all of the material is moving at that velocity. One needs to compute the rotational kinetic energy using:
        1/2 *moment_of_inertia*angular_velocity^2

    207. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but doing stupid things like flying an RC helicopter, that has a motorized blade that is powerful enough to hurt or kill, next to their head is something that people with survival instincts won't do.

    208. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with that statement you have shown that you are no more caring than the person you responded to. Way to posture, hypocrite.

    209. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but if I spent all of my time grieving for everyone who dies, I'd not have any time for myself or my loved ones. I'd rather joke and be happy than cry and be depressed. Oh and when I die, I encourage any who wants to crack jokes to go ahead and do so.

      Get over yourself.

    210. Re: OUCH by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Preaches the anonymous coward.

    211. Re:OUCH by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      If he wasn't an adult, then why would it have been legal for him to enlist in the military?

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    212. Re:OUCH by gagol · · Score: 1

      Natural selection at work. If you do stupid shit, you may die. Why the hell is a kid playing with a 2000$ toy anyway?

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    213. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA needs another seven astronauts.
      Diana died in a nasty accident.

      Jokes are funny. Get over it.

    214. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guns don't kill people Remote Control Helicopters do...

      Oh wait you mean ban helicopters!

    215. Re:OUCH by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I have no doubt this story discussion will be filled with jokes (somewhat understandably), but man that's horrible for his father as well.

      It's more amazement than jokes, really. Remote controlled helicopters always blow my mind.

    216. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a 41 year old Man in Switzerland who get killed by his Gaui X7 just about one month ago. But all in all there are really not many accidents when you think how many people fly everyday. Just hope this was the last terrible accident for this century. I'm truly sorry for his family.

    217. Re:OUCH by Raenex · · Score: 1

      All those jokes and I didn't see the one I heard as a kid in school the next day:

      Q: "What was the last thing to go through Christa McAuliffe's mind?"
      A: The control panel.

    218. Re:OUCH by ah.clem · · Score: 1

      What I meant was the size (700), like the Align T-Rex 700 Nitro I thought he was sponsored on, but yeah, didn't mean to infer 700 displacement, I have no idea what they displace, around 90 or so? Big, whatever. I fly DLG and and motorized sailplanes on a field next to rotor guys and I get to see all kinds of 3D stuff. I will admit there have been times I've felt nervous when they were figuratively tossing a tumbling heli in our direction. I'll agree to disagree with you on how sharp the LE is on the CF rotors are at speed; I got a deep cut on my calf attempting to fly a small electric heli of the guys at the club offered me one day. It was my fault, buddy box cable wasn't working and after him insisting it was easy (and I did have some sim time on helis), I gave it a go. I got it hovering and should have landed happy; instead, ended up in an accident. Live and learn. Sailplanes are exciting enough for me.

      --
      "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
    219. Re:OUCH by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I do a little bit of RC flying myself and in TFV something is definitely out of balance/whack in the model he is flying. A big problem in this hobby is that just about anyone can go out and buy extremely powerful and dangerous flying chainsaws, watch a few videos and think they have it in the bag. Here is some Video idiocy and here are some of the injuries caused by what the media dubs as a toy .

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    220. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, listen, I was very at easy in my public hotspost web session when that guy dared come in nearby with the same wireless mouse! What did I do? I started moving the mouse frantically. Nothing, he stayed there. So I closed the lap and went out to have another beer...

    221. Re:OUCH by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      If one chooses to subscribe to the view that God is whatever exists outside of our necessarily limited perception of space and time, and believes that hell is the permanent separation from the light of a higher existence that might deliver one's essence from those bounds, and that heaven is the condition in which the shackles of constructs we presently live in, in terms of space and time, are lifted to transcend to a less restrictive plane of existence, then necessarily one must believe that heaven would not be equal to hell in terms of restraint.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    222. Re:OUCH by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 1

      Lol!!!

      Reminds me of the banning of balls at a school in Ontario because a parent got knocked out by a ball to the head.

      Shit happens. We can't stop the world from spinning because of one incident.

      FYI that was "fake" with the banning of balls at a school in Ontario.

      http://www.cbc.ca/newsblogs/yourcommunity/2013/09/cbc-radio-show-strikes-again-with-ball-less-soccer-satire.html

      ""The CBC Radio show This is That — a satire of Canadian culture, news, and CBC Radio itself — aired its first show of the new season last weekend and already people are mistaking its spoofs for real news. Again.

      They posted their latest offering on their blog on Tuesday and it was believable enough to enrage some sports fans."

      But on to the main subject I agree wth the majority here that it was the 19 year old's fault 100%. Obviousely the father didn't teach him enough safety lessons in regards to R/C helicopters and the kid did it to himself by sitting down and landing the damn thing right next to his body on a table. To me that's kind of like eliminating another moron from the gene pool that SHOULD have realized "Um Gee maybe I shouldn't land this next to my body". But I do feel for the father though he'll have to live with not only seeing his son kill himself like that but also realising he could have prevented it by trying to teach him some more safety lessons and hope for the best.

      --
      You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
    223. Re:OUCH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      No, there was a ban on hard balls. Don't know what you link refers to but I know a teacher at that school and they confirmed it was true.

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2011/11/16/toronto-school-balls.html

    224. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, people don't care about the death of a man's child, even if he was 19. Think how his parents, his family and friends are feeling right now.

      If you wouldn't say it to their faces, don't fucking say it at all.

      People who don't care at all are psychopaths. But it's possible to care, and yet still make jokes about it. It's not an all-or-nothing thing. My rule of thumb-once you can laugh about something, you've begun to heal.

      I remember watching the Challenger disaster on TV. It stunned me. And then, a couple of days later, I was making Challenger jokes. That's how I dealt with my it, moving forward. But I'd never tell one of those jokes to the families or friends of the astronauts, if I met them. Nor would I assume that everyone would find them funny.

      If I thought about every single person who is in pain, I'd either melt into a useless pool of empathy or become numb to everything. I'd rather people made jokes if it means they are actually thinking about the people involved. If you can't differentiate between when jokes are okay and when they aren't, that's the problem.

      It may be, in a few years, some of these jokes are precisely what the father needs to hear. Not now, likely. But to blindly dismiss humor from the healing process; that, to me, is atrocious. Most of us have no idea what the family needs now, in the future, or ever. So don't make blanket assumptions, especially pompous ones that assume you're better than others.

    225. Re:OUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watching some of his videos he had posted on YouTube. He, and his friends fly these things all around their heads, and put the thing so close, this accident is no surprise!

  2. Hats off for model helicopter enthusiasts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hats off for model helicopter enthusiasts.

    Too soon?

    1. Re:Hats off for model helicopter enthusiasts. by mrclisdue · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now I know why they call them choppers!

      cheers,

    2. Re:Hats off for model helicopter enthusiasts. by oodaloop · · Score: 2

      Austin Powers: "That's no way to get ahead in life."

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Hats off for model helicopter enthusiasts. by s.petry · · Score: 1

      He was a head banger in addition to being an RC enthusiast?

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re:Hats off for model helicopter enthusiasts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That obviously didn't go through his mind at all...

  3. Re:This Was News Yesterday by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Do you really refresh Slashdot all day for the latest news, AC? That's not really what it's for. Maybe you live in NYC, but it wasn't on the news aggregators I looked at last night.

    Oh, and, topically: BAN ALL THE THINGS!

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  4. Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those things are not "toys". Anyone with more than a passing interest in them will tell you that.

    1. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      toy /toi/
      noun
      1. an object for a child to play with, typically a model or miniature replica of something.

      Other than the child part, it seems to fit the definition of "toy" pretty closely, unless they were doing something practical with them?
      You sound like one of those people running around yelling "It's not a doll, it's an action figure!"

    2. Re:Toy? by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The only difference between men and boys are the price of their toys."

      Don't be so sensitive on the terminology. Any recreational device can be considered a toy. Some "toys" are quite expensive, and some can be quite deadly if used improperly and require caution and respect, but they're still basically adult toys.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so sensitive on the terminology. Any recreational device can be considered a toy. Some "toys" are quite expensive, and some can be quite deadly if used improperly and require caution and respect, but they're still basically adult toys.

      You sound like a real sadist, do you have any good recommendations for adult "toys"?

    4. Re:Toy? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well what do you call a device you have for no practical reason.. a tool? no, you call it a toy. even if it is big and dangerous.

      fyi, dirtbikes are toys too(for 99.9% of owners of them)..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do so many people use the word "adult" to mean "juvenile"?

    6. Re:Toy? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Considering the hell itself probably cost upwards of 2k just on the airframe, its hard to call it a toy.

      It was a gas-turbine heli, they are the most expensive ones you can buy.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    7. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This brings up another point: 19 years old is not a "man". It's a kid / young adult.

      Kids these days don't mature until their mid 20s to early 30s. This is especially true if they're rich enough to afford an RC helicopter.

    8. Re:Toy? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2

      It is a device whose sole purpose is entertainment. It was not a training tool for his job, it was not a mode of transportation, it was not something he did for a living. It was entertainment. AKA, a toy!

      All of the guns I own are toys because I don't use them to hunt for food or for protection. Does that make them less dangerous or less expensive? My snowboards cost me over $1500 (combined) but they're still toys. My bicycles, arguably a form of transportation, are used as toys.

      The price of the toy is irrelevant, it's still a toy.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    9. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do so many people use the word "adult" to mean "juvenile"?

      He's talking about sex toys Captain Dildo.

    10. Re:Toy? by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      How about a sports car or an off road vehicle.

    11. Re:Toy? by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      It's very easy to call it a toy. Was it used for anything other than personal amusement? No? Then it's a toy.

      Don't take "toy" as a term of derision. Take it as a description of its intended use.

    12. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the hell itself probably cost upwards of 2k just on the airframe, its hard to call it a toy.

      Sure it's a toy. Its only purpose is to be played with. That makes it a toy in my book regardless of price.

    13. Re:Toy? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Because juveniles aren't supposed to access to the materials at the adult book store?

      I think the better question is why is it that so many people use the term "juvenile" to refer to things that are by and for adults.

    14. Re:Toy? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Guns are never toys. I don't care if you're only using them to shoot targets, they are a tool. A tool that's designed to kill and destroy. Yes, a lot of people use them for target practice (destroying), hunting (killing) and self defense (killing); but ultimately the use is destructive.

      If you want a toy gun, get one of those models that shoots soft pellets, and make sure not to use them without appropriate eye protection.

    15. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can still drive those to work and around town.

    16. Re:Toy? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      A model or replica wouldn't be functional. This was.

      It was not a toy helicopter. It was an unmanned helicopter. There is a major difference.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    17. Re:Toy? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      No, they are designed to accelerate a metal projectile to high speeds with an accurate vector. What the intent of that action is has nothing to do with it.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    18. Re:Toy? by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      An object used for recreation does not immediately make it a toy. Unless you want to argue that guns are often nothing but toys.

    19. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't usually argue in favor of guns, but I'm pretty sure an object used for recreation automatically makes it a toy. Just because you have to use something responsibly doesn't mean it's not a toy (otherwise nothing made for anyone over the age of about three could be considered a toy).

    20. Re:Toy? by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      they're still basically adult toys.

      are you sure about that? I just walked into my local adult-toy store asking for something with a 10 HP engine and three-foot blades that could do 1500 RPM and they just stared at me then asked me to leave.

    21. Re:Toy? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Im sorry you cant imagine uses for personal drones beyond a 'toy'. Also, you are a fool for referring to a gun as a toy. Its not , its a specialized tool.

      --
      Good-bye
    22. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      toy /toi/
      noun
      1. an object for a child to play with, typically a model or miniature replica of something.

      Other than the child part, it seems to fit the definition of "toy" pretty closely, unless they were doing something practical with them?

      But "child to play with" is an important distinction. There are miniature cars and toy cars. You wouldn't (hopfully) let a child play with a miniature car/go-kart capable of 50MPH, but a Toys-R-Us ride-on car is just fine. You wouldn't let a child play with a working replica M-1 rifle, but an airsoft toy gun is probably fine.

      There are toy R/C helicopters you can hold in your hand and fly inside without too much damage. There are model replica helicopters with more horsepower than your average moped. One of those is not safe for children to play with.

    23. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im sorry you cant imagine uses for personal drones beyond a 'toy'.

      That is irrelevant. Was this guy or most of the other hobbyists here using it for such more practical uses? Something being a toy is not mutually exclusive with being used by other people for different reasons. If I went out and bought or rented an excavator to play around digging up a field for nothing more than fun, it becomes a toy, regardless of how dangerous or useful it is otherwise. And yes, guns are tools, but for many people who don't use them for hunting or protection, they are toys too.

    24. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It said "typically." I have high voltage electrical devices and some laser based devices I use for science demonstrations that I call toys, because they are pretty much exclusively used for entertainment and fun factor (minimal education factor), but had no practical use otherwise. It doesn't have to be small or non-functional to be a toy.

      It was not a toy helicopter. It was an unmanned helicopter.

      It was both, one doesn't preclude it from being the other.

    25. Re:Toy? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Play with a M1 rifle? No. Fire with supervision? As soon as they are big enough the kick won't knock them over.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    26. Re:Toy? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Then they are weak sports cars/off road vehicles. 'Trailer queens' aren't rolling compromises.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    27. Re:Toy? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Internal combustion 'adult toys' are called 'Harleys' aka kickstart vibrators.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    28. Re:Toy? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In fact, guns are designed to efficiently put holes in targets. That's the design purpose of the invention as a whole. Some guns really do have features which are explicitly useful for the purpose of making it easier to put holes in humans, however. I've always thought it was bananas to argue that there's no such thing as an assault weapon. The argument is rather that there's no argument for granting a monopoly on assault weapons to the government under the second amendment.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:Toy? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      No, they were designed and built for the purpose of killing and destroying. Honestly, that apologistics makes me sick.

      The devices were invented for the express purpose of killing things, nobody would have invented such an expensive device otherwise. And yes the intent of the action has everything to do with it, why else would they have invented the things in the first place? Target practice as a sport didn't exist until well after the invention of the firearm, it was not the cause of the invention of the firearm.

    30. Re:Toy? by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      There's a guy at work that occasionally drives his Caterham in. I doubt many would call that a weak sports car, of course that's certainly a weak "daily driver".

    31. Re:Toy? by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      Play with a M1 rifle? No. Fire with supervision? As soon as they are big enough the kick won't knock them over.

      + 1^1000

    32. Re:Toy? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      My fishing boat cost me $12k (which is actually a fairly cheap boat) and I have no qualms calling it a toy. I have a pilots license and the airplanes I fly (real honest to goodness planes - not RC) are pretty much toys too.

      Pretty much anything that is used for recreation or fun rather than for actual work can be considered a toy - it really has nothing to do with price.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    33. Re:Toy? by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      No, they were designed and built for the purpose of killing and destroying. Honestly, that apologistics makes me sick.

      The devices were invented for the express purpose of killing things, nobody would have invented such an expensive device otherwise. And yes the intent of the action has everything to do with it, why else would they have invented the things in the first place? Target practice as a sport didn't exist until well after the invention of the firearm, it was not the cause of the invention of the firearm.

      Please pardon me if I am making an untoward assumption about your perception of carrying firearms. For some people, firearms are necessary tools. When one lives in a remote area, carrying firearms is normal. One's choice of properly carried firearm(s) is dictated by local threats. I usually carry small caliber weapons (to deal with small threats, such as rabid skunks and raccoons, or the occasional rattlesnake), a shotgun, and a high- capacity rifle (to deal with packs of javelina, which have attacked me in the recent past). YMMV.

    34. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The only difference between men and boys are the price of their toys."

      Don't be so sensitive on the terminology. Any recreational device can be considered a toy. Some "toys" are quite expensive, and some can be quite deadly if used improperly and require caution and respect, but they're still basically adult toys.

      Well, if he'd contented himself with sticking his helicopter up his arse, he might still be alive today.

    35. Re:Toy? by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Your definition is at odds with the accepted perception of toy. For example, say I have a real decorative samurai sword. Obviously it is only there for personal amusement, or possibly to help repel a home invasion. Now, if someone comes over and asks me, "is that a toy?" under your definition I should say yes. However, it is obviously irresponsible to answer in that manner because the likelyhood of this curious person cutting his fingers off trying to pick it up has just increased significantly.

      Calling dangerous objects toys is almost as irresponsible as treating them like toys.

    36. Re:Toy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could act the same when as any other where someone asks an ambiguous question that has multiple interpretations that involves safety: don't just say yes or no. "Is that a toy?" "It is very sharp, but I don't use it for self-defense." or "It is decorative, but still sharpened."

    37. Re:Toy? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If it's streetable, even barely, it's weak. DOT tires and windows just to start. Non gutted interior. All kind of parts that don't make it go faster.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    38. Re:Toy? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      No. Their predecessors like the old Chinese Hand-Cannon were designed for killing and destroying. I won't argue that. However, target rifles for example, have evolved from that base goal.

      As well they are not necessarily destroying targets either. For example, these which the projectile only makes noise and some motion.

      I'm sorry that your only experience with firearms has involved killing, or that your only firearms experience is that which has been fed to you by the TV.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  5. Re:Natural Selection at Work by nopainogain · · Score: 5, Funny

    This guy is going to get flamed but I agree. No flying-chainsaws near your own head. It seems like a "no-brainer" oops, too soon?

  6. Re:This Was News Yesterday by MightyYar · · Score: 0

    Maybe I'm an isolated case, but I hardly watch TV (Netflix-aholic) and this did not show up on news.google.com yesterday - or at least I did not see it. Besides that, this is not time-sensitive news.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  7. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gotta agree. After watching that video of him flying his RC copter so recklessly, this was pure idiocy.

  8. Better him than an innocent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given his attitude, "'was known to be aggressive in his flying and often executed tricks", would be matter of time for getting someone hurt. Father's fault for not teaching him prudence properly.

    1. Re:Better him than an innocent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Father's fault for not teaching him prudence properly.

      Neighbor Victor Tommaso feels the same way, and would go so far as to publicly demand that:

      His father must be destroyed.

      so that this won't happen again.

  9. Always wear a helmet! by mi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Real helicopter pilots always wear a helmet. And so should you...

    BTW, would somebody think of the children ? How long before some maniac brings one of these to school and decapitates a bunch of innocent children?

    It is long overdue we ban them on school grounds (and for a couple of miles around each school) and establish a national registry for the devices and background checks for buyers!

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Always wear a helmet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this guy won't hurt anyone ever, so maybe someone did think of the children...

    2. Re:Always wear a helmet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But we must make sure to only ban assault model helicopters!

    3. Re:Always wear a helmet! by mi · · Score: 2

      But we must make sure to only ban assault model helicopters!

      Oh, no we don't. This most recent incident is just another painful reminder, that the time for half-measures is gone! Enough! We must do something about the safety of our communities, the safety of our kids. And we must do something NOW! .

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:Always wear a helmet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article didn't mention that once striking a hard enough object, like the head, even carbon fiber blades become unbalanced and damaged to the point where the model becomes so unstable that it would crash soon afterwards.

      I'm worried more about the maniac just flying the heli into the kids and let all the debris and flying components do the real damage.

    5. Re:Always wear a helmet! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      But we must make sure to only ban assault model helicopters!

      Those are the ones that look exactly like other model helicopters, except they have black synthetic bodies and a tac. rail, right?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:Always wear a helmet! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Real helicopter pilots always wear a helmet. And so should you...

      I'm fairly certain that's to protect their head from getting banged around inside the cockpit and that even the best helmet would to fuck-all against the spinning rotor blade of a real helicopter.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    7. Re:Always wear a helmet! by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Where would he put it on?

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    8. Re:Always wear a helmet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well good thing we have HAL to tell 'dave i can't let you do that'

    9. Re:Always wear a helmet! by mi · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain that's to protect their head from getting banged around inside the cockpit

      A distinction without difference — in this case...

      even the best helmet would do fuck-all against the spinning rotor blade of a real helicopter

      Actually, it might still keep the head in one piece. It may still fly away from the body (in one piece), if hit closer to the middle, but you may be luckier, if it slides higher. Whereas you'll be scalped without a helmet, you may survive with one. Not that it matters to TFA, of course.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    10. Re:Always wear a helmet! by x0 · · Score: 1

      But we must make sure to only ban assault model helicopters!

      Those are the ones that look exactly like other model helicopters, except they have black synthetic bodies and a tac. rail, right?

      And a shoulder thing that goes up.

      m

      --
      In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
    11. Re:Always wear a helmet! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      But we must make sure to only ban assault model helicopters!

      Those are the ones that look exactly like other model helicopters, except they have black synthetic bodies and a tac. rail, right?

      And a shoulder thing that goes up.

      m

      ?

      You mean a collapsible/folding stock?

      Pretty sure 'a shoulder thing that goes up' is not an industry term...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    12. Re:Always wear a helmet! by x0 · · Score: 1

      ?

      You mean a collapsible/folding stock?

      Pretty sure 'a shoulder thing that goes up' is not an industry term..

      It's an arfcom meme...

      A youtube search for that phrase will enlighten you.

      m

      --
      In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
    13. Re:Always wear a helmet! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Googled it, checked the Wiki page, laughed my arse off.

      Well done, sir.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    14. Re:Always wear a helmet! by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      Where would he put it on?

      His "other head". :)

  10. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you want recent news, don't come to Slashdot.
    If you want hardcore technical news, don't come to Slashdot.
    If you want real politics, don't come to Slashdot.
     
    Slashdot is about discussing the stories. Most of the discussions and stories carry a bias that most either love or hate. Most are wildly inaccurate... to the point some of them come off like total lies.
     
    Slashdot really isn't a news site. It's not the best place for news from any genre of news. The opinions of those who discuss the news are often narrow minded and wrong.
     
    Welcome to Slashdot.

  11. Re:Natural Selection at Work by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, I agree this very unsafe behavior for at least one reason, just off the top of my head.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  12. Good. by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least he didn't kill anybody else.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Now wait for the restrictions or ban. This fucktard ruined it for everybody.

    2. Re:Good. by zidium · · Score: 1

      And we now know that such "toy" helicopters make an effective anti-zombie munition!!

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
  13. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really mean ban all the things - like ban chainsaws and BBQ grills and all the other things that could kill a person when not used safely, or do you just mean ban remote control helicopters because you have some irrational bias against other people's hobbies.

  14. Re:Shitbird Obama Supportes Untie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    They told me that if I voted for Mitt Romney, the middle east would slide into turmoil and bloodshed due to the US's wreckless cowboy diplomacy. And they were right!

  15. I wish media would stop referring to this as a toy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toy helicopters are available for $20 from amazon.

    This was an enthusiast's RC model.

    Toys don't decapitate people.

  16. Re:This Was News Yesterday by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Do you really mean ban all the things - like ban chainsaws and BBQ grills and all the other things that could kill a person when not used safely, or do you just mean ban remote control helicopters because you have some irrational bias against other people's hobbies.

    Pretty sure he means to be facetious, Eisenstein.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  17. Straw man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is actually advocating, or going to advocate, banning them? Citations? I'm waiting.

    By the way, you forgot to put <smug> . . . </smug> tags around your post.

    1. Re:Straw man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's bullshit right there.

      The words of the constitution require membership in a "well-regulated militia." Now, reinterpreting the constitution because you're penis isn't large enough, does not make the meaning of the words any different. What's more, that amendment was made during a period where the US had no standing army, didn't know if the nation would last and depended upon deputizing civilians whenever they needed to conduct a search for criminals.

      Not to mention the fact that repeaters weren't invented for decades later and it would be over a century before ammunition would become cheap enough to permit people to practice.

    2. Re:Straw man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice way to ignore the original question you fucking ignorant shitbag. I hope you die in a fire.

    3. Re:Straw man by mi · · Score: 1

      The words of the constitution require membership in a "well-regulated militia."

      No, they do not. There are no requirements on citizens in the 2nd Amendment. Zilch.

      because you're penis isn't large enough

      Ah, the clean, precise, and convincing arguments of the Constitution-shredders...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  18. I wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the Rotary Club will make him an honorary member?

    1. Re:I wonder if... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      He was VP. But I hope they nominate him for the Club's Hall of Fame

  19. Get Hurt Early Get Hurt Often by wrackspurt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was a klutz, big hands, big feet, big head, small body, but I tried out for every sport and when I didn't make the teams I waited to be picked last for pickup games. I don't know if this guy missed out on team sports but maybe he did. Sports teach you you can get hurt. Computer games and remote controlled toys don't teach you about getting hurt. They don't instill caution.

    1. Re:Get Hurt Early Get Hurt Often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A giant four-foor spinning blade sure as hell instills caution in me; not sure what would do a better job, actually.

    2. Re:Get Hurt Early Get Hurt Often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... a man is killed and all you can did make it about you and insinuate that maybe he had social problems too? That's a new low even for the normally extremely insensitive Slashdot.

    3. Re:Get Hurt Early Get Hurt Often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RC enthusiasts tend to start with smaller devices - they are cheaper when you crash them. And they don't do so much damage when you have an accident.

    4. Re:Get Hurt Early Get Hurt Often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever started a small glow engine by hand, or, for safer finger smacking a rubber band model? There's plenty of pain to be found in model aircraft.

  20. Murder? by Prune · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying it's likely at all, but how can one be sure that someone else didn't override his signal and took over control of the craft? Just a thought.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    1. Re:Murder? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      That's pretty paranoid, but who knows? Maybe if he wore a tinfoil hat, he'd still be alive.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Murder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying it's likely at all, but how can one be sure that someone else didn't override his signal and took over control of the craft? Just a thought.

      DSMX makes this not even feasible.

    3. Re:Murder? by Prune · · Score: 2

      I don't believe you. The algorithm has been reverse engineered: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1759502 Anyone skilled with a software radio could eventually synchronize to this and then just need to put out a more powerful signal.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    4. Re:Murder? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Why bother? Just overpower (jam) the signal and who knows what happens...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Murder? by Prune · · Score: 1

      You're right.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    6. Re:Murder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just stick "NSA took over the helicopter" as a possibility and you can get a 30 second segment on the Alex Jones show.

  21. Re:Natural Selection at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like a flying lawnmower, no?

  22. Model aircraft season by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    Couple this incident with Colorado selling thousands of drone hunting permits and perhaps its time to find a safer hobby than model aircraft. Like say noodling

    1. Re:Model aircraft season by cruff · · Score: 1

      ... Colorado selling thousands of drone hunting permits ...

      The small eastern Colorado plains town that is thinking of selling these permits != the entire state of Colorado.

    2. Re:Model aircraft season by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, that's what we want. A bunch of paranoid crazies shooting blindly into the air with high powered rifles.

    3. Re:Model aircraft season by cruff · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, that's what we want. A bunch of paranoid crazies shooting blindly into the air with high powered rifles.

      Isn't that the normal state of affairs in many parts of the world? Why should the US be any different?

    4. Re:Model aircraft season by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can noodle, if you like.

      I'll stick with canoodling, thank you very much.

    5. Re:Model aircraft season by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not into the air, we will fly drones low and fast, till only one hunter left. Then call police to arrest him for accidental killing(s). And yes, we will give them a proof from onboard camera.

  23. Missing details by jbeaupre · · Score: 0

    He was executing a trick

    Wait. What? There was prostitution involved?

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Missing details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOB: Michael, a trick is what a whore does for money. [Notices children] Or candy!

    2. Re:Missing details by Prune · · Score: 1

      What is "GOB"? None of the definitions I found by a web search fit.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    3. Re:Missing details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time, try Googling the quote itself instead.

    4. Re:Missing details by X-Power · · Score: 0

      google Gob Bluth

    5. Re:Missing details by Prune · · Score: 1

      You still use Google, after all the shit that's been around news and especially on Slashdot?

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    6. Re:Missing details by Prune · · Score: 1

      I go there and... "There is currently no text in this page." U funnay!

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    7. Re:Missing details by Prune · · Score: 1

      I recommend you don't "google".

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    8. Re:Missing details by Minwee · · Score: 1

      And whatever you do, don't google "google". You could break the Internet.

    9. Re:Missing details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but that is wrong. halloween it is Trick OR Treat, it is the implied threat of doing a trick if they don't get candy.

    10. Re:Missing details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, Google and affiliates might now think to market Arrested Development to you next time you let an ad load. You can use Google without putting sensitive information into it. Or if you have a broader sense of what is sensitive information, you could do like most people when a brand name is dropped: substitute it with which ever brand you prefer.

  24. Malfunction or unnecessary risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe it was actually a malfunction but I suspect not.
    It seems like serious hobbyists sometimes run into the same problem as many of the extreme sports folks. It's easy to become complacent after years of nothing serious ever going wrong, then they let their guard down or take an unreasonable risk just one time too many and the results are catastrophic.
    They call them helicopter blades for a reason. Never let them get near you under any circumstances, unless the model is shut down.
    This is New York though, so I'm sure there will be new an idiotic regulations requiring foam-rubber blades and full-body kevlar, or more likely just banning all powered models larger than a couple of pounds alltogether (except for government agencies or law enforcement). Imagine this thing carrying a soda larger than 16 ounces. Now that would be a truly egregious danger.

  25. Instant Darwin award! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bam!

    Really, how can someone be so stupid?

    1. Re:Instant Darwin award! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      By being a 19-year-old boy?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  26. Helis by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

    He had plenty of space to fly..

    The trick should not be how close to potential danger you are. Especially with a 4+ foot wingspan!

  27. Brace yourselves by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can hear the legal coffers clinking as lawyers prepare to amass and file class action lawsuits over an infrequent incident blown out of proportion by newscasts seething with "Think of the children" and "Helicopters kill people" campaigns.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:Brace yourselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Helicopters do kill people pretty regularly

    2. Re:Brace yourselves by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I can hear the legal coffers clinking as lawyers prepare to amass and file class action lawsuits over an infrequent incident blown out of proportion by newscasts seething with "Think of the children" and "Helicopters kill people" campaigns.

      Meh, chances are they'll be about as successful as lawyers who sue Smith & Wesson because people play Russian Roulette.

      Which is to say, not at all.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  28. better than the other way around by nimbius · · Score: 2

    if i were to die by drone (radio controlled aircraft in this case) id rather it be the one I control.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:better than the other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, because it wouldn't have happened if a Computer controlled it...
      Always good old reliable human failure, just like car crashes...

    2. Re:better than the other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that (and his death as well) suicide?

  29. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Alsee · · Score: 1

    You mispelled sarcastic.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  30. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want recent news, don't come to Slashdot.

    Are you kidding? It's well known now, but you see, there's even a lag in the complaints, so when he sent the message, it was still timely.

  31. Re:I wish media would stop referring to this as a by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

    Being more expensive doesn't make it stop being a toy.

  32. Cue... by longbot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...NYC outlawing remote-controlled planes/helicopters/etc in 3...2...1...

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    1. Re:Cue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> outlawing remote-controlled planes/helicopters/etc

      Unless they belong to LEO, NSA, FBI, etc...

    2. Re:Cue... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      only ones over 16oz

  33. Re:This Was News Yesterday by TWX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are also procedures for using chainsaws, barbecue grills, and other things that can kill a person. There probably are procedures, at least minimal, CYA procedures for model aircraft too. That he wasn't following them is why he killed himself. Given his performance-nature of his stunts, think of it like the guy who juggles chainsaws, a not-recommended use of the device, that could, and in this case did, lead to injury and death.

    I play with model rockets. Fairly big ones, I'm up into the "G" engine size, and we practice a certain amount of range safety. I've had factory-made engines explode on the pad and that 30' distance is very important, as are following procedures for hooking up the electrical wiring for the ignition. Even with rockets that have exploded on the pad, rockets that have broken up in-flight right after leaving the pad, and rockets that have caught on fire, no one has ever been hurt because we're not stupid enough to sit right next to the rocket when we fire it. The only real danger we have to face is rockets whose parachute ejection fails, and the rocket coming down like a javelin, which has happened a couple of times but nowhere in the vicinity of where anyone was at the time.

    I feel sorry for the guy's family, but my sympathy is limited by the documented reckless behavior he's shown before.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  34. In Soviet Russia ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    tricks execute you.

    (sorry)

  35. In his last video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some of the stunts he performs are pretty impressive, but as far as I can tell they're all dangerously close to him, given the model can go what appears 0-100 in less than a second. At some points the vehicle is less than 10 feet from him. I would call it a toy, but it's a bit beyond that.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRPfLKVMGM8 - Last video posted by Pirozek. Rest in peace, doing what you loved.

    1. Re:In his last video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for sharing the YT link, it is very impressive.

    2. Re:In his last video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  36. Vic Morrow Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twilight Zone: The Movie. Yrggg!

  37. Re:Murder? Possible and maybe practical by PseudoCoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not saying it's likely at all, but how can one be sure that someone else didn't override his signal and took over control of the craft? Just a thought.

    It's quite possible with the old analog FM transmitters if you knew which channel they were in, and even then the two transmitters would be "fighting" for control and positive override control would be very difficult. The way he was used to flying so close to himself (according to one of the stories) it only takes a brief "radio hit" while the chopper was close enough to him to lose momentary control and cause this impact. Someone could possibly take advantage of one of these moments and just mess with the signal a little bit, if they wanted to do it deliberately.

    In the case of an FM radio system it's more possible it may have happened by accident if someone on the same FM channel started their transmitter and gave his receiver even a quick radio hit. At a field with loose radio impound rules it's possible another user on his FM channel could have accidentally switched their transmitter on without checking to see if that channel was in use. In my rookie days I would have done something like that.

    With the newer digital 2.4GHz spread-spectrum stuff it's highly unlikely to happen by accident and would be a lot more work to achieve deliberately.

    Either way I would not take the chance to fly so close to me. I have a healthy respect of rotating machinery and so should everyone.

    --
    "Now, I doubt any of you would prefer a rolled up newspaper as a weapon against a dictator or a criminal intruder."
  38. And for my last trick... by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    RIP

    1. Re:And for my last trick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ROX

  39. 19-year-old Helicopters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article doesn't say why he was so enthusiastic about 19 year old helicopters.

  40. Great candidate for a Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIP RC guy.

  41. these things should be regulated!!!11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a hard time calling something that can chop off the top of your head a toy.

    1. Re:these things should be regulated!!!11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are using anything for entertainment it is a toy.
      Even if the thing is expensive, dangerous or can be used in a non-toy capacity.

      When you use a RC-helicopter for running a camera in a movie it is a tool.
      When you use a RC-helicopter during competition or training for a competition it is sports equipment.
      When you use a RC-helicopter because you think it is fun to fly it is a toy.

    2. Re:these things should be regulated!!!11 by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      So what, you want your kitchen knives and tools to be regulated while you're at it?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  42. Re:This Was News Yesterday by show+me+altoids · · Score: 4, Informative

    Given his performance-nature of his stunts, think of it like the guy who juggles chainsaws, a not-recommended use of the device, that could, and in this case did, lead to injury and death.

    Actually, juggling chainsaws, while somewhat dangerous, isn't as bad as it looks. Even though the motor is running, the chain is not moving, at least with a stock chainsaw. You have to press on the trigger for the chain to move. Fucking safety interlocks, how do they work?

    --
    I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
  43. I fly model helicopters by MpVpRb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are definitely NOT toys

    The high performance ones have 5 to 10 HP motors

    The flying style currently popular among the top pilots is to fly very close to the ground and very close to the pilot

    So naturally, the guys with less talent want to fly like the pros

    I think this is kinda crazy..no room for error

    1. Re:I fly model helicopters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but the "pros" are often the actual problem, and this guy may have even been considered one of them. Didn't help him any. Complacency is a danger at all skill levels. Never point a gun at someone you don't intend to shoot, whether you think it's loaded or not, and never fly a powerful and dangerous (and in cases like this, deadly) machine ANYWHERE NEAR a human, especially when performing complex maneuvers and in an uncertain environment with wind, etc.
      There are also linked videos of people catching these things in their hands. What a bunch of morons. They may as well be idiot street-racers.

    2. Re:I fly model helicopters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why do some of you model heli people take yourselves so seriously? Is it a hobby, used to entertain or just something you enjoy when you aren't working? Then it is a toy. Price doesn't matter, power doesn't matter, skill required doesn't matter. I have a sports car with a 350 hp motor. It is a toy.

      Toy isn't a denigration. It is a classification.

    3. Re:I fly model helicopters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a friend who flies them as well and I have seen some close calls. It definitely looks very dangerous.

      Personally, my biggest fear is not even the pilot but others around him. If you are not careful, you may end up injuring some one else pretty badly. Even in open areas it is sometimes hard to predict if a kid is not going to show up out of nowhere running after a ball or some such thing.

    4. Re:I fly model helicopters by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      They are definitely NOT toys The high performance ones have 5 to 10 HP motors

      Sorry. Our mistake. So the useful purpose these serious pieces of non-toy equipment are flown for is...?

    5. Re:I fly model helicopters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, these pilots are insane. Take a look at how this one is flown (same model as the one that killed the kid): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1XErIlh6Ac

    6. Re:I fly model helicopters by Alioth · · Score: 2

      Quite a lot of them are flown for aerial photography. I have a T-Rex 700 (electric hell, rotor disc of about 1.7 metres) with special skids (taller and wider) to allow a digital SLR camera to be carried on a gimbal. The previous owner used it for photography business.

    7. Re:I fly model helicopters by tippe · · Score: 1

      Complacency is a danger at all skill levels

      What an awesome quote. Don't know if it's your own, AC, but it's awesome. And so true...

      Reminds me of the numerous stories that I've heard or read of "pro" woodworkers (a coworker of mine included) cutting themselves on their table saw. Sometimes it was thankfully only a nick (as in the case of my coworker), sometimes it resulted in a lost finger or two, but in all cases that I've heard, the admitted cause was always complacency (or, more accurately, lack of attention due to complacency). Thankfully I haven't cut myself on my table saw yet, but then again I'm scared shitless of it, so maybe my fear is keeping me from getting complacent...

    8. Re:I fly model helicopters by BubbaDave · · Score: 1

      All forms of recreation do not involve toys, to my mind.

      The line I choose to draw is that if the activity requires skill that takes a significant investment of time and effort, it does not involve a toy.

    9. Re:I fly model helicopters by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Truly.

      Lots of people hunt. I'd never call a gun a toy...

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
  44. Re:This Was News Yesterday by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    I know what I said.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  45. Michael Fuckin' Crichton knows who did it!!!1 by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I bet this is the nefarious plot of Dr. Charles Luther.
    Yeah, that's Gene Fuckin' Simmons there. WTF 80's?!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  46. After reading this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got half a mind to build one myself......

    1. Re:After reading this.... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Don't want to pay for a divorce lawyer?

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  47. Re:This Was News Yesterday by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There probably are procedures, at least minimal, CYA procedures for model aircraft too. That he wasn't following them is why he killed himself. Given his performance-nature of his stunts, think of it like the guy who juggles chainsaws, a not-recommended use of the device, that could, and in this case did, lead to injury and death.

    Except that helicopter was many feet away from him for most of its use, and it was intended to be used exactly as he used it. It's sometimes not possible to be aware of exactly how far away and high up a model is just by looking, as models are small and depth perception is weak in our species.

    There is only ONE 'CYA' rule for model aircraft: Try not to hit anything. Most of the time when you operate an R/C aircraft, it's something smaller and softer, where if it did hit a person, it might give them a small cut from the prop but is otherwise like getting hit by a big Nerf dart. This guy was using the metalized pro model, which was a bit more dangerous.

    It sounds like he was doing some simple ground effect tricks, and the heli got too close and clipped him. It's actually a hobby and a sport, in which many hundreds of people participate. If you think doing tricks with model helis is 'documented reckless behavior', then I have nothing to say but "You must be a ton of fun at parties.."

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  48. Insane stunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw a youtube video of this guy performing stunts with his model craft, and it looked absolutely insane. The things that he did with that craft seemed unreal. The speed and precision involved is mind-boggling. I can also see why this guy had the top of his head, and a shoulder, cut off.

    I'm at work right now, so I can't go searching youtube for the video, but I'm sure it's not hard to find since he used his real name for his youtube username.

  49. While it wasn't *THAT* Rotary Club... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was the Associate Vice President or something of the Model Rotary Aircraft club for Brooklyn or something.

    I sorta skimmed TFA.

    But if we're going to make jokes about honorary club membership, maybe he'll get an honorary membership in the National Association of Self-Induced Lobotomies (NASIL, so named after the ancient egyptians way of removing brain matter.).

  50. Re:Natural Selection at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll probably get modded down for that. Just a head's up.

  51. Maybe... by wbr1 · · Score: 2

    He should have flown his stunt towards Anthony's Weiner?

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  52. Where are helicopter parents when you need them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where are helicopter parents when you need them?

  53. In Limerick Form by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 4, Funny

    Roman was out with his father
    Of safety he couldn't be bothered.
    As was his shtick
    he pulled off a trick
    and his helicopter became his barber.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
    1. Re:In Limerick Form by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That was terrible. And hilarious.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:In Limerick Form by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware of barbers holding remote controls.

    3. Re:In Limerick Form by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      So close.... I was going for terribly hilarious.

      next time...

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    4. Re:In Limerick Form by tippe · · Score: 1

      I would have said "crude" and "indecent" myself.

      But then again, what do you expect from someone called "Crudely_Indecent"?

    5. Re:In Limerick Form by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Too-close helicopters bring you danger
      Don't let your habits make you a stranger
      Burma Shave.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:In Limerick Form by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      Roman was out with his father Of safety he couldn't be bothered. As was his shtick he pulled off a trick and his helicopter became his barber.

      BURMA SHAVE

    7. Re:In Limerick Form by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      Oops - sorry - should have refreshed before posting BURMA SHAVE...

  54. Re:This Was News Yesterday by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure he means to be facetious, Eisenstein.

    OK, in Soviet Russia, famous movie director is also as smart as a physicist?

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  55. They are NOT "toys"! by Chas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I keep seeing people (even the parent article here) using the term "toy" helicopter.

    These models are NOT "toys". They're precision machines and very VERY dangerous. Treating them like toys is what leads to people getting hurt.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:They are NOT "toys"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Danger doesn't factor into whether or not something fits into the classification "toy". It's purpose is what makes it a toy. You use it for enjoyment, yes?

    2. Re:They are NOT "toys"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, a car is a toy? A stove is a toy? A band saw is a toy?

    3. Re:They are NOT "toys"! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So, a car is a toy? A stove is a toy? A band saw is a toy?

      If the car is used just for fun, it's a toy. Etc etc. Many people refer to one or more of their cars as toys. I used to have a 240SX set up for drifting, that is definitely a toy. It's also dangerous. It's not a children's toy. I crashed it once. The person I sold it to crashed it. No one was injured.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:They are NOT "toys"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pedantry and Semantics, I would expect no less from slashdot commenters!

    5. Re:They are NOT "toys"! by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      So, a car is a toy? A stove is a toy? A band saw is a toy?

      That's very possible:

      toy |toi|
      noun
      1 an object for a child to play with, typically a model or miniature replica of something : [as adj. ] a toy car.
        an object, esp. a gadget or machine, regarded as providing amusement for an adult : in 1914 the car was still a rich man's toy.

      Toy and tool do not exclude each other. My laptop is more a toy at home, but a tool at work. (not that I don't like the work, but I rather keep a more serious pose there) I'm not sure where the EXACT difference lies, but I prefer to know the context before I judge. I've seen stoves I'd love to play with, I've seen cars (Ford Falcon!) that would serve me no more purpose than fun (heck, anyone with more than 2 cars could be considered to keep cars as toys), I wouldn't call a band saw a toy but someone else might: to each his own, I guess?

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  56. Re:This Was News Yesterday by TWX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It sounds like he was doing some simple ground effect tricks, and the heli got too close and clipped him. It's actually a hobby and a sport, in which many hundreds of people participate. If you think doing tricks with model helis is 'documented reckless behavior', then I have nothing to say but "You must be a ton of fun at parties.."

    No, I have my own dangerous hobbies. I've built engines, rebuilt carburetors and had my share of spontaneous combustion of some of them that I screwed up with, and had other automotive issues that were interesting to deal with when they cropped up. Nothing like a front tire blowout on a 30 year old truck at 75mph... Anyway, he cut part of his head off, his fault. I'm not saying that I would've told him to not do what he was doing, but I wouldn't have wanted to be around when he was doing it either. He did what he wanted to do, and it cost him everything.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  57. rest in peace fellow pilot by Max_W · · Score: 1

    An aircraft flies very quickly. It can happen to any pilot.

    1. Re:rest in peace fellow pilot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Controlling a remote toy doesn't make him a pilot.

      No it doesn't make you one either. Stop lying to yourself.

    2. Re:rest in peace fellow pilot by g5g5g5 · · Score: 2

      Yes it does.
      A pilot or aviator is a person actively involved in flying an aircraft
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot_%28aircraft%29

    3. Re:rest in peace fellow pilot by Max_W · · Score: 1

      I am an office worker. Sometimes I work from home via computerized communication channel. I remain an office worker.

      The same about piloting. If a pilot wants to seat inside an aircraft - fine. But if she wants to be somewhere else and still pilot an aircraft, the technology does exist for it.

      Piloting an aircraft via remote control is risky. Any human endeavor is risky.

    4. Re:rest in peace fellow pilot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My kid isn't driving when he's playing with a little rc car. He's just a kid playing with a toy.

      Likewise that guy isn't a pilot. He's just some guy playing with a toy.

      No you're wrong.

    5. Re:rest in peace fellow pilot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry bud, it's just a toy and you're not a pilot. No one is being fooled.

      go to flight school and get a real pilots licence. then you can call yourself one.

  58. Re:I wish media would stop referring to this as a by firex726 · · Score: 1

    I think it's more a matter of danger.

    The $20 toy one you could hit with your finger and meh, at most might smart like snapping a rubber band.

    A copter like that or others will often have blades made from carbon fiber, be very sharp at the edge and spinning at several thousand RPM. Put your finger near it and it'll slice it off.

  59. One positive aspect to this... by enilnomi · · Score: 1

    I no longer have to go all the way up to Freeside just to let my friendly neighborhood AI shake the Turing cops off my tail.

    --
    education is no substitute for intelligence
  60. Maybe it's because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was nearsighted :D

  61. Re:This Was News Yesterday by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    LOL, I never knew Eisenstein was a real person! To me it's just something we used to say when we were being smart-assed kids.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  62. Re:Murder? Possible and maybe practical by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    If he's mere feet away from it, the other signal would have to be quite strong to stomp on it (presuming the same power level is used)

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  63. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    You misspelled misspelled.

    And Alsee misspelled Einstein (unless of course he knows who the AC is). :)

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  64. Murdered by NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA took over his helicopter and killed him with it to justify a ban on private ownership and operation of "drones," which will be enacted by our King shortly. This will free up the skies for NSA and CIA drones to spy on American citizens without interference from private "drones."

  65. he'll never be the head of a major corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..

  66. That's terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was the helicopter OK?

  67. nerf 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they are going to make them put foam around the rotors and a tennis ball on the ends. Probably won't even fly anymore, but won't anyone think of the children?

  68. Is this suicide? by asylumx · · Score: 1

    Is this considered accidental suicide or something like that? I wonder how his life insurance company (if any) will handle this.

    1. Re:Is this suicide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Death by misadventure.

    2. Re:Is this suicide? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Is this considered accidental suicide or something like that? I wonder how his life insurance company (if any) will handle this.

      Death by gross negligence, since he was flying the heli near his own head, which is basically equivalent to pointing a gun at your face as you begin to disassemble it. But he's 19 years old, odds are he doesn't have life insurance, nor any dependents. I hope.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  69. Re:Murder? Possible and maybe practical by Prune · · Score: 1

    Difficult but not impossible. The specific frequency hopping algorithm of this model has been reverse engineered, as I posted in reply to someone else in this discussion, and with a software radio it's not that hard to synchronize to this. If you have a powerful transmitter and/or big antenna, you can override his signal. Of course, you can just use a high power jammer as well, which is much easier--engage it only when the chopper is close to the mark. But as I said, I don't think this is likely, just that it's a small possibility.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  70. RIP by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    What a tragedy. From watching his youtube videos, it was clear that, as a pilot, he was head and shoulders above the rest.

  71. Re:The deeper motive by PraiseBob · · Score: 1

    They do have a motive, web traffic & ad sales. Accidents do happen every day, but grandma falling down the stairs doesn't draw traffic. Guy accidentally cuts off half of his own head, im sorry to say, but it draws attention. Its the old adage, if it bleeds it leads. Look at the number of slashdot posts on it, where this article will be one of the most commented articles of the day, and most hits, but essentially has the very least amount of comments needed.

  72. Re:This Was News Yesterday by isorox · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is about discussing the stories. Most of the discussions and stories carry a bias that most either love or hate. Most are wildly inaccurate... to the point some of them come off like total lies.

    Slashdot really isn't a news site. It's not the best place for news from any genre of news. The opinions of those who discuss the news are often narrow minded and wrong.

    Welcome to Slashdot.

    You're thinking of Fox News

  73. Citation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I asked for a citation, and you didn't give one. Instead you just gave more smug platitudes.

  74. In Soviet Queens... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    trick executes you.

  75. Sometimes the skies aren't so friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.spike.com/video-clips/0n8an2/1000-ways-to-die-just-plane-dead

  76. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes I think Slashdot is the nerd arm of Fox News.

  77. It's official by kryliss · · Score: 1

    RC Helicopters kill people, let's get them banned!! We need more RC Helicopter laws!!! Criminals will start using them!!!!

    --
    --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
  78. The park was not set up safely. by Mantle · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here's a couple of reports on that very same park by a few locals:

    I had just visited the park where this happened to watch because i love this hobby (prior to the incident) and there really should be more safety precautions taken in fling fields, because these helicopters are only 40-50 yards from the spectators, and there is nothing stopping these things to do what it did to that kid

    Last year I went to a fun fly at that field. A lot of those guys, including Roman (who I met), were pretty much flying right in their faces and on the deck the entire time they were flying. Even that day there was an incident where another guy was flying above his skill level on the deck, the tail smacked the ground and the heli started pirouetting out of control. Well it flew right into the pit area and hit a car, and the shattering glass injured somebody. And yet immediately after there were still about 6 or 7 guys at a time flying next to each other on a field that's about 500 feet wide without any concept of staying in their own flight box. Since that day I hadn't been there again and I definitely am not going back there now.

  79. Think of the children by operagost · · Score: 1

    Here come the draconian government regulations. This is just what they needed to make the skies clearer for their assassination drones.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  80. Re:This Was News Yesterday by cusco · · Score: 1

    At least on mine it's not a safety interlock (which would prevent the chain from moving at all), it's a centripetal clutch. Clutch doesn't engage until the motor is going x-many RPM, which pushes the spring-loaded arms outward until they contact the inside of the drum of the clutch, which is what rotates the chain sprocket. I had a Motobecane moped years ago that functioned the same way.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  81. Looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His performance was
    *puts on sunglasses*
    cut short!

  82. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    what he meant with documented reckless behavior was an earlier YT clip (sorry) of him flying a similar model close to his friend on a park picnic table.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  83. Re:This Was News Yesterday by show+me+altoids · · Score: 1

    Okay, but effectively yours works the same way. If the chainsaw is idling, the chain is not turning.

    --
    I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
  84. odd location for rc flying, by kenj123 · · Score: 1

    the park is at Gravesend Bay, near Coney Island and it can get pretty gusty off the ocean. I'm from the area, in fact I was sailing near by on Wednesday and I was going to stay out overnight and sail Thursday as well. Wednesday was beautiful and the wind was just right with a few gusts to get the adrenaline flowing. But Thursday was supposed to be a lot worse and it sounded like too much work, so i got out on Wednesday night. After hearing about this I'm all the more glad i didn't go out thurs.. I was out a couple days before, and it was really gusty then, the coast guard helicopter was circling around to see if anyone was in trouble.I'm currently not working :(, but having lots of fun :).

  85. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  86. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  87. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  88. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure he's not referring to Gauss' student?

  89. I guess that's it for this hobby by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    One moron and this whole thing will be banned.

  90. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It's sometimes not possible to be aware of exactly how far away and high up a model is just by looking, as models are small and depth perception is weak in our species.

    It was his helicopter, so he should have known how big it is. Given the size, anyone with half a brain can estimate the size.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  91. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... trick executes you.

  92. Re:This Was News Yesterday by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Small cut from the prop? Please tell me you don't fly RC.

    Tip speed is almost constant for RC props in similar use. The smaller the prop the higher the RPM. Granting the small props weigh less, they will still fuck you up.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  93. Re:This Was News Yesterday by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It was his helicopter, so he should have known how big it is. Given the size, anyone with half a brain can estimate the size.

    You forgot one eye, he'll need half a brain, one eye, and an estimate of the size to estimate the distance from the apparent size. Conveniently, he now has half a brain...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  94. Re:Natural Selection at Work by bidule · · Score: 1

    Oh, we will off it entirely.

    --
    ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
  95. You nerds can burn in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to say that I am honestly sick and appalled by all those making jokes of a person's DEATH.

    I am honestly very surprised to see this lack of compassion and ability to empathize with someone else's immense loss. While I may not have a 19 year old son, I do have a daughter whom is turning 3 years old. The mere thought of ever having to see her die in front of me pisses me off to a degree I cannot even properly explain and also breaks my heart and brings tears to my eyes hoping I will never have to endure that.

    I cannot begin to understand what the father of this young guy has to endure seeing his son die in front of him. I am very close to my own father and I know if something like that happened to me it would destroy him. Those of you making jokes are completely sick and I hope you all suffer terrible diseases and in general have Karma catch up with you.

    Heaven forbid if I ever found myself needing help I know the slashdot crowd now are NOT people that I could depend on for a shred of humanity. Has growing your neck beards, fat asses and knowledge of Linux erased your ability to function as human beings? Can those of you that like to tinker with legos and build robots out of the technic stuff and all that not understand that this person had a hobby similar to yours, just under a different subject?

    Least the kid was there doing something constructive, and providing entertainment to both himself and those around him. It never crossed my mind that something like this would happen, although yes thinking about it, it does look dangerous. The car that I put serious money into to get more power out of could potentially kill me if I lost control going 160 on a dead stretch of highway having fun. We all have our vices, but damn people.

    This is sad... If i wanted to read ruthless crap like what has been posted by you worthless sacks of flesh I would of thought I would have to go read Live Leak comments or Ogrish. It's easy to arm chair comment and work up the math of what joules of force it takes to hypothetically cut through skull and brain matter, but the kid had to walk the walk and feel it.

    Damn, if terrorists attack us after the crazy shit the government is pulling, I hope you lot wind up eating a nice big dirty bomb up your arses and bleed out getting to experience death in intricate detail. Maybe while your at it, you can work out math equations and your next pearl scripts in your heads to identify how much blood content is left in your bodies as it bleeds out and possibly get the chance to learn compassion for those that came before you suffering horrendous deaths. Or hell, maybe you'll be the next posts to have more slashdot moral high horse leaguers cracking jokes about your deaths while your families (if you have any that care about you) either celebrate or suffer the loss.

    grep my bawls beyotches!

  96. Another casualty of drone culture by musth · · Score: 1

    Will this slow down the march of mechanized, flying-everything-everywhere in our skies? Hopefully.

    I'm sorry for the family's loss.

  97. Clarification by crazyninjamonkey4 · · Score: 1

    To clarify, the TFV WASN'T the vehicle that killed him. The TFV featured a 300mm (Motor to motor. The propellers are much smaller, probably around 8 inches) multirotor that wouldn't do much more than a bad scratch if it hit you. The helicopter involved is a 600mm blade span traditional helicopter. The TFV is an inacuraccy of sloppy reporting by someone who doesn't know the difference. It's safe to assume that with the style of flying Roman was doing, he didn't have a camera on board, nor would the footage be on YouTube yet.

  98. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a modern chainsaw three come to mind.

    1. There is a centrifugal clutch on the engine. If the engine isn't turning over at a high enough RPM then the clutch is disengaged. This is probably what you are talking about.

    2. Throttle trigger interlock. The throttle trigger can't be squeezed to accelerate the engine unless a lever in the handle is held down. This tries to ensure that at least one hand is properly positioned on the chainsaw. It also stops the saw from accelerating if it is dropped or kicked while running.

    3. Chain brake. A bar in front of the front/top handle. If you push this bar forward it acctuates a brake that stops the chain no matter what speed the engine is running at. Its normal use is to lock the chain when you aren't using it. Its positioning is such that if you have a kickback while operating the saw the chain brake will hopefully be actuated and the chain stop before the bar hits something soft and squishy.

  99. He should have stuck to bowling... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ...with his cousin.

  100. Warning: by Snufu · · Score: 1

    Flying lawnmowers may cause bodily harm.

  101. Looks like the trick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EXECUTED HIM.

  102. long term rc heli pilot here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw an early linked video of the pilot which has been taken down from youtube
    the flying I saw was close, fast and left little margin for error.
    if you add risk and leave a minimal margin for error the result is inevitable
    rip roman

  103. Time for mythbusters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two-years from now, an episode of mythbusters will try it out and see if it's possible or not and then end with they will use katana blades on top of a helicopter to test it even further.

  104. Re:This Was News Yesterday by Alsee · · Score: 1

    And you misspeled CanHasDIY.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  105. Why this this news for nerds? by petman · · Score: 1

    I don't see why this is news. It's not like something like this has never happened before. Those things are dangerous. Accidents are bound to happen somewhere, somehow, sooner or later.

  106. The Species IS Now Stronger by Whitworth_Thread · · Score: 1

    For sure, this kid is a candidate for a Darwin Award. See: http://www.darwinawards.com/

  107. Boys will be boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "cutting off the top of his head" WOW... that sounds like a real helicopter. I hope he wins the Darwin award this year!

  108. It's not the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the third death by rc helicopter thatÂI've heard of this year...

  109. Was it a.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was it a Hattori Hanzo helicopter?