Other articles are usually pretty quick to point out the reason, but this one has an agenda.
The vast majority of accidents involving driverless cars are low speed rear end collisions. Most drivers will not report a 3mph collision with no damage, but google does.
The original suit filed by blizzard was in the US, but they cannot file suit using that law as it is criminal. They would need to get a prosecutor to take it up on behalf of the state, and it is likely not a big enough deal to do that (nor should they, this is better handled as a civil suit.)
They may have some difficulty in Germany, as while I am not familiar with German law it is usually required that the issue the court will decide has taken place in that country. It is my understanding that all of this took place in the US (the original suit, the settlement, and the location of the copy of source code in question).
As someone who was formerly a consultant I was asked to do illegal projects every once in a while (ranging from "go tap and monitor all telecommunications traffic to this address" to "build this sports betting site" to "crack this software" to "lie under oath as an expert" to "retrieve our competitors source code").
Vetting your clients and their projects is part of that line of work, and is the responsibility of the contractor or their organization. You fail to do this at your peril, it can and does end in jail time if you produce a program which breaks the law.
Now my position gives me final say in what our company produces as a product, and I regularly shoot down ideas which would not be legal (usually these are somewhat tame aggressive marketing schemes, but occasionally a product idea is blatantly criminal.)
The terms of use may or may not be enforceable, but they definitely constitute what would be considered authorized access to the server owned by Blizzard.
Violations of the following parts would likely make it past a grand jury (although it would not exactly be the most solid case.)
18 U.S.C. 1030 (2) (c) (4) (5) (b) (5) (c)
I am not sure about Germany, perhaps that is why they are suing in a German court rather than US (the original suit was in CA.) In the US the contractor would own the code even if the contract specified a number of hours and not a specific deliverable unless:
1) It was a contribution to an existing work or 2) The copyright was transferred after the software was written by specific assignment.
As long as the contractor wrote all of the code in question he likely owns the US copyright (which may or may not be the case, there are a lot of small software companies who do not employ a programmer and use contract work for everything.)
I am not sure it would even be a problem for blizzard US to have the source in the US... I would think they at least need to have it or a derived product in Germany before they could sue over the German copyright.
I have had that happen a couple of times over my career (as a consultant though, not an employee.)
I always greatly increased my rate when returning, usually double what I was charging. If they cancelled work in a hostile manner and had to come crawling back a couple of weeks later I knew I had them over a barrel.
Programming is a practical application of math, you could probably substitute it for formal proofs with no ill consequences (the point in both cases is to teach logic, but programming is more useful.)
Not just comp sci, science in general should be combined with math.
Too many people think they are good at math, but only learned to memorize. Many have no ability at all to recognize where you would apply it, making it mostly useless to them in the real world.
The difference is that debate is "soft" while programming is "hard". I mean this in the sense that if you have an ok argument which is not perfect it can still be effective, but there is a lot less room for error in programming. Your code is accepted by the compiler (or interpreter) or it is not, and it works as intended or it does not.
Running into problems which are complex, have multiple solutions, and there is a definite working or not outcome is important to teach logic and attention to detail. How early this should be done is a question.
He said he thought it would be a good idea, not that they do. While we are at it, they should also teach basic cooking and nutrition. Far too many people cannot cook for themselves, and get tied to fast food and snacks (which has horrible consequences as you get into your 30s and later, especially when combined with a complete lack of exercise.)
A basic class on programming is useful not only to give a minor understanding as to what this machine can do, but also to teach logic and determine who has an aptitude for it.
What are they going to do, fire you and make the problem worse? It makes my company extremely nervous when I am on vacation, but when I inform them I am going it is not a question.
If you are forbidden vacation time you need to take a long hard look at your realistic value, and if you think you are valuable you should grow a spine.
I usually inform work I will be out six months in advance if I can, as I am aware of how disruptive it is (with exceptions for funerals and other events which cannot be anticipated.) I do not phrase that as a question, I am informing them of when I will not be there.
I never get bothered by my boss while on vacation unless it is of the utmost importance, although my employees feel more free than I would like to contact me anyway.
It is no guarantee that he will have a successful career, but it is a good starting point. No college teaches you everything, once you get out and spend some time in the real world you will understand that better (or find another career, the wash out rate in industry for cs graduates is pretty high.) We are at full employment in the industry right now, so anybody who graduates with a degree or even takes a class in prison is probably getting a job of some sort. This is a boom and bust field though, and it tends to shed those who are not in the top third or so every once in a while.
Speed coding definitely has its place in industry, and the major architecture decisions are not made by people who just entered the field unless it is something stupid simple like a basic CMS. A lot of people who do not have a formal education miss things like algorithmic efficiency, but that alone is not even close to enough to optimize a program well, and I can refer them to a reference for what they would miss during a CS degree (which proceeds at such a slow pace that someone who will end up doing well can likely cover it in their free time in less than six months with a little motivation... they already know how to program after all.)
You probably only think you have worked on a big project, I would put the starting point on that at a few million lines of code. You do not have time to make a substantial contribution to a code base like that over a class or two.
Looking around the office at people with at least ten years in the field and who are not assigned disposable tasks (with commensurate pay), it is almost evenly split between those with a degree and and those who do not have one. The thing is that most with a degree do not have it in CS.
You learned maybe 20% of what you need to have a moderately successful career in school if you are really lucky, paid attention, and went to a top university. That does give you a leg up, but only against those with no real experience. I will almost always take someone with four years of paid work as a programmer over someone with a degree, and in my opinion the best degree to see on a programmer is in physics or another hard science anyway (for a pure programmer at least... I give some weight to a degree in the subject the programs I expect them to write will cover.)
In short: A new programmer needs a lot of training no matter if they have a degree or not, what I want to see is logic and the ability to learn from a written reference. I do not feel a CS degree is a good indicator of that, even if it should be.
It does, however, mean he can code. This puts him above the majority of the college grad applicants I see.
Before someone comes in to explain that computer science is not about programming... that is fine, but I am not interested in hiring that kind of employee. I want people who can program, and when the interesting problems come up I would rather assign it to someone who has demonstrated practical ability, as they usually tend to be better with both current theory and novel solutions as well.
Nobody sane trusts a new programmer with important tasks anyway, and nobody really cares if or where you went to school when you are measuring experience in decades. Winning competitions helps to land your first job, which is also what a degree does.
In some ways the degree is more of a risk, as this is a field where being able to learn from a book is required if you are to be competent. If you needed someone to hold your hand and walk you through it you will be a poor programmer, where someone who picked up a book, studied on their own, and can now write a working program has already shown they can do this.
Your plan is to locate and fine the homeless based on DNA? Somehow I do not see that working well. Maybe long jail terms would work, but that removes the lack of a financial burden the fine is supposed to ensure.
The most effective way cities deal with that problem is to harass the homeless enough that they leave for a more favorable area, frequently by police beatings or turning a blind eye to crime against them.
Get some panhandling and vagrancy laws passed if you want to solve it, then make sure they are enforced. That ensures police contact, which will quickly provide a disincentive to be there.
Effecting change is to bring about or create change, affecting change is to alter how change happens. Which you meant is up to you.
When you say "You affect change and change has an effect." you are saying you modify the already existing change, and it creates another change which did not exist prior.
If you had said "You effect change and change has an affect." you would be saying that you bring about a change, and that change alters the way things are.
You effect change (create it, or bring it about), and it affects other things (modifies those things.) You could affect change, but that would be redirecting the path that change would take, and this is not what is normally meant.
The same reason you do not want to upgrade caused me to upgrade. Computers are not really getting faster at a good rate any longer, especially at the top end.
My old computer was a 3.2ghz dual core AMD with more than normal cache memory, a middle of the line graphics card from the era, and 8GB memory from 2009 which cost me about $800. It runs nearly everything, but not at max.
My new one is nearly top of the line, which is partly due to seeing the similar one I ordered for the lady last year, and partly looking at product roadmaps and determining that it would be at least a few years before anything substantially faster would be released.
It was about twice the cost and six years later, and is about twice as fast for CPU limited tasks (the SSD is a major improvement, hard drive load times are much faster, the kind of games I play are usually vsync locked at 60 anyway.)
There is no reason to continue to upvote this... I have been at the karma cap for a long while, and at this point nobody is going to make this less than full score without a fuckton of sock puppets.
Save your mod points. No matter how awesome Elon Musk is and how eloquent I am in my drunken postings, it is not going over +5.
My genius self would take a pay cut to work for him on the basis of the advancement of the human race... but there is just no point in continuing to vote it up.
I approve of what Elon Musk has done with his wealth.
I cannot say that for the vast majority of billionaires, and I could say the same of millionaires. My question is what do you think he should do? If you cannot come up with a better answer than he actually invested in...
Slashdot Mirror
I assume you speak at least two languages without error?
Other articles are usually pretty quick to point out the reason, but this one has an agenda.
The vast majority of accidents involving driverless cars are low speed rear end collisions. Most drivers will not report a 3mph collision with no damage, but google does.
The original suit filed by blizzard was in the US, but they cannot file suit using that law as it is criminal. They would need to get a prosecutor to take it up on behalf of the state, and it is likely not a big enough deal to do that (nor should they, this is better handled as a civil suit.)
They may have some difficulty in Germany, as while I am not familiar with German law it is usually required that the issue the court will decide has taken place in that country. It is my understanding that all of this took place in the US (the original suit, the settlement, and the location of the copy of source code in question).
As someone who was formerly a consultant I was asked to do illegal projects every once in a while (ranging from "go tap and monitor all telecommunications traffic to this address" to "build this sports betting site" to "crack this software" to "lie under oath as an expert" to "retrieve our competitors source code").
Vetting your clients and their projects is part of that line of work, and is the responsibility of the contractor or their organization. You fail to do this at your peril, it can and does end in jail time if you produce a program which breaks the law.
Now my position gives me final say in what our company produces as a product, and I regularly shoot down ideas which would not be legal (usually these are somewhat tame aggressive marketing schemes, but occasionally a product idea is blatantly criminal.)
Normally I would agree, but in this case Blizzard owns the server they accessed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act
The terms of use may or may not be enforceable, but they definitely constitute what would be considered authorized access to the server owned by Blizzard.
While this is not really a big enough deal to interest the feds... not only is there a law, it is among the oldest of laws related to computers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act
Violations of the following parts would likely make it past a grand jury (although it would not exactly be the most solid case.)
18 U.S.C. 1030
(2) (c)
(4)
(5) (b)
(5) (c)
I am not sure about Germany, perhaps that is why they are suing in a German court rather than US (the original suit was in CA.) In the US the contractor would own the code even if the contract specified a number of hours and not a specific deliverable unless:
1) It was a contribution to an existing work
or
2) The copyright was transferred after the software was written by specific assignment.
As long as the contractor wrote all of the code in question he likely owns the US copyright (which may or may not be the case, there are a lot of small software companies who do not employ a programmer and use contract work for everything.)
I am not sure it would even be a problem for blizzard US to have the source in the US... I would think they at least need to have it or a derived product in Germany before they could sue over the German copyright.
They taught coding but not typing?
While I have known a programmer who used the hunt and peck method, it is a pretty severe handicap.
I have had that happen a couple of times over my career (as a consultant though, not an employee.)
I always greatly increased my rate when returning, usually double what I was charging. If they cancelled work in a hostile manner and had to come crawling back a couple of weeks later I knew I had them over a barrel.
Programming is a practical application of math, you could probably substitute it for formal proofs with no ill consequences (the point in both cases is to teach logic, but programming is more useful.)
Not just comp sci, science in general should be combined with math.
Too many people think they are good at math, but only learned to memorize. Many have no ability at all to recognize where you would apply it, making it mostly useless to them in the real world.
The difference is that debate is "soft" while programming is "hard". I mean this in the sense that if you have an ok argument which is not perfect it can still be effective, but there is a lot less room for error in programming. Your code is accepted by the compiler (or interpreter) or it is not, and it works as intended or it does not.
Running into problems which are complex, have multiple solutions, and there is a definite working or not outcome is important to teach logic and attention to detail. How early this should be done is a question.
He said he thought it would be a good idea, not that they do. While we are at it, they should also teach basic cooking and nutrition. Far too many people cannot cook for themselves, and get tied to fast food and snacks (which has horrible consequences as you get into your 30s and later, especially when combined with a complete lack of exercise.)
A basic class on programming is useful not only to give a minor understanding as to what this machine can do, but also to teach logic and determine who has an aptitude for it.
What are they going to do, fire you and make the problem worse? It makes my company extremely nervous when I am on vacation, but when I inform them I am going it is not a question.
If you are forbidden vacation time you need to take a long hard look at your realistic value, and if you think you are valuable you should grow a spine.
I am with you there, "allowed" is for chumps.
I usually inform work I will be out six months in advance if I can, as I am aware of how disruptive it is (with exceptions for funerals and other events which cannot be anticipated.) I do not phrase that as a question, I am informing them of when I will not be there.
I never get bothered by my boss while on vacation unless it is of the utmost importance, although my employees feel more free than I would like to contact me anyway.
It is no guarantee that he will have a successful career, but it is a good starting point. No college teaches you everything, once you get out and spend some time in the real world you will understand that better (or find another career, the wash out rate in industry for cs graduates is pretty high.) We are at full employment in the industry right now, so anybody who graduates with a degree or even takes a class in prison is probably getting a job of some sort. This is a boom and bust field though, and it tends to shed those who are not in the top third or so every once in a while.
Speed coding definitely has its place in industry, and the major architecture decisions are not made by people who just entered the field unless it is something stupid simple like a basic CMS. A lot of people who do not have a formal education miss things like algorithmic efficiency, but that alone is not even close to enough to optimize a program well, and I can refer them to a reference for what they would miss during a CS degree (which proceeds at such a slow pace that someone who will end up doing well can likely cover it in their free time in less than six months with a little motivation... they already know how to program after all.)
You probably only think you have worked on a big project, I would put the starting point on that at a few million lines of code. You do not have time to make a substantial contribution to a code base like that over a class or two.
Looking around the office at people with at least ten years in the field and who are not assigned disposable tasks (with commensurate pay), it is almost evenly split between those with a degree and and those who do not have one. The thing is that most with a degree do not have it in CS.
You learned maybe 20% of what you need to have a moderately successful career in school if you are really lucky, paid attention, and went to a top university. That does give you a leg up, but only against those with no real experience. I will almost always take someone with four years of paid work as a programmer over someone with a degree, and in my opinion the best degree to see on a programmer is in physics or another hard science anyway (for a pure programmer at least... I give some weight to a degree in the subject the programs I expect them to write will cover.)
In short: A new programmer needs a lot of training no matter if they have a degree or not, what I want to see is logic and the ability to learn from a written reference. I do not feel a CS degree is a good indicator of that, even if it should be.
It does, however, mean he can code. This puts him above the majority of the college grad applicants I see.
Before someone comes in to explain that computer science is not about programming... that is fine, but I am not interested in hiring that kind of employee. I want people who can program, and when the interesting problems come up I would rather assign it to someone who has demonstrated practical ability, as they usually tend to be better with both current theory and novel solutions as well.
Nobody sane trusts a new programmer with important tasks anyway, and nobody really cares if or where you went to school when you are measuring experience in decades. Winning competitions helps to land your first job, which is also what a degree does.
In some ways the degree is more of a risk, as this is a field where being able to learn from a book is required if you are to be competent. If you needed someone to hold your hand and walk you through it you will be a poor programmer, where someone who picked up a book, studied on their own, and can now write a working program has already shown they can do this.
Your plan is to locate and fine the homeless based on DNA? Somehow I do not see that working well. Maybe long jail terms would work, but that removes the lack of a financial burden the fine is supposed to ensure.
The most effective way cities deal with that problem is to harass the homeless enough that they leave for a more favorable area, frequently by police beatings or turning a blind eye to crime against them.
Get some panhandling and vagrancy laws passed if you want to solve it, then make sure they are enforced. That ensures police contact, which will quickly provide a disincentive to be there.
They can both be verbs.
Effecting change is to bring about or create change, affecting change is to alter how change happens. Which you meant is up to you.
When you say "You affect change and change has an effect." you are saying you modify the already existing change, and it creates another change which did not exist prior.
If you had said "You effect change and change has an affect." you would be saying that you bring about a change, and that change alters the way things are.
It is the other way around.
You effect change (create it, or bring it about), and it affects other things (modifies those things.) You could affect change, but that would be redirecting the path that change would take, and this is not what is normally meant.
The same reason you do not want to upgrade caused me to upgrade. Computers are not really getting faster at a good rate any longer, especially at the top end.
My old computer was a 3.2ghz dual core AMD with more than normal cache memory, a middle of the line graphics card from the era, and 8GB memory from 2009 which cost me about $800. It runs nearly everything, but not at max.
My new one is nearly top of the line, which is partly due to seeing the similar one I ordered for the lady last year, and partly looking at product roadmaps and determining that it would be at least a few years before anything substantially faster would be released.
It was about twice the cost and six years later, and is about twice as fast for CPU limited tasks (the SSD is a major improvement, hard drive load times are much faster, the kind of games I play are usually vsync locked at 60 anyway.)
Copying it from the newegg invoice what I am typing this on is:
CPU INTEL|CORE I7 4790K 4.0G 8M R
SSD 1T|SAMSUNG MZ-75E1T0B/AM R
VGA MSI | GTX 970 GAMING 100ME RTL
MB MSI | Z97A GAMING 7 RTL
MEM 8Gx2|GSKILL F3-2400C10D-16GTX R
BLU-RAY BURNER LG| WH14NS40
PSU CORSAIR | CX750 750W RT
CASE CORSAIR | CARBIDE 200R RT
MS WIN 8.1 PRO 64 BIT %
There is no reason to continue to upvote this... I have been at the karma cap for a long while, and at this point nobody is going to make this less than full score without a fuckton of sock puppets.
Save your mod points. No matter how awesome Elon Musk is and how eloquent I am in my drunken postings, it is not going over +5.
My genius self would take a pay cut to work for him on the basis of the advancement of the human race... but there is just no point in continuing to vote it up.
Do you understand the laws of the universe?
I am beginning to I think I do in my most arrogant moments, and it terrifies me what the consequences are when I realistically evaluate that.
I approve of what Elon Musk has done with his wealth.
I cannot say that for the vast majority of billionaires, and I could say the same of millionaires. My question is what do you think he should do? If you cannot come up with a better answer than he actually invested in...