Just because we hear about it doesn't mean anyone else gives a shit about.
And more to the point, just because someone sees your crap doesn't mean it will have any effect.
This is something you learn in advertising as well as politics. Just getting a lot of attention is often COMPLETELY worthless. What you want is your objective to happen.
What is that? if you are an activist for something then you want something to happen. If that thing happens because these guys are doing this... then you got me, I was wrong. If it doesn't... then this failed.
If you're selling something then you want people to actually BUY it. I get ads all the time for stuff for really old people. Like... life alert etc. I'm not remotely old enough to even begin considering such a product so marketing it to me is a waste of resources.
Politics works the same way. You have to do targeted lobbying. If some jackoffs in California are vaguely aware of your situation in Spain but don't care then exactly how does that help you? You need to put pressure on YOUR politicians in YOUR country where the ACTUAL issue is happening. My opinion or your opinion on it means DICK. Because neither of us are going to put any pressure on those politicians that are actually controlling the issue.
This is a curio at best. It appears ineffectual and faddish.
oh, if it were up to me, I'd just leave them right where they put themselves. They're all trust fund retards so they could pay someone to get them out. But that would mean their daddies would get upset.
if they just literally died there then I'd let them just decompose on the spot. Nothing would serve as a better example of the price of idiocy.
But my larger point was that this projecting crap on a wall is not impressing anyone. In china they have dudes that light themselves on fire... and die. In Australia and California they have people that put loaded guns in their mouths and blow the tops of their heads off on the capital steps.
You want to impress me? You're going to need to try harder than this crap. These guys don't know the meaning of hardcore if they think this is even remotely impressive.
Oh you're not allowed to protest? Well, that's never happened before... and certainly protestors always follow the letter of the law when they're forbidden to protest.
Seriously... In California we have people show up to protests with handcuffs and gas masks. They put the gasmask on and then handcuff themselves to something.
It has become so common that police and construction workers make sure to keep a pair of bolt cutters on hand so they can cut the handcuffs off.
And the really serious protesters sometimes show up with these oil drums that they chain themselves into... and then pour cement into the drums so that you can't get their hands out unless break up the cement... which is dangerous because the jack hammer could damage their hands.
It causes a big problem. And then you have random acts of vandalism... not projecting some light on a wall... but actually splashing some paint onto said wall that expresses your message whatever that happens to be.
So yeah... projecting some light on a wall... slacktivism.
Again, the political authorities tend to take things more seriously that require more effort or guts. This shit is easy and is zero risk. It also involves not a lot of people actually having to show up.
In washington DC we have marches in the hundreds of thousands over various issues. And most of those are either ignored or go no where. Some light projected on a wall? Utterly ignorable.
Politicians respond to anything that seems harder. Why they don't respond to emails so much as letters. You mailed a letter... it is harder then popping off an email.
So a virtual protester doesn't mean much. Just saying.
It is a well established product. It is as likely to fail as your car is to not start on any given morning. The technology is quite refined and well understood.
Fire safes can typically handle fires in excess of a thousand degrees or so. If the fire gets up to blast furnace levels... then your data is likely fucked. But it is really rare for fires to get that hot. What is burning in your house is typically wood framing, furnature, carpets, drapes, etc. Airflow in a burning house is unpredictable and tends to dictate the nature of the fire. Chances are a server closet is going to have TERRIBLE airflow for a fire. They typically overheat on their own without ventilation and whatever ventilation is sufficient to keep a room like that cool is going to be far than what a raging fire would need. So... unless you're keeping your fire safe in the middle of a room designed also to have the airflow characteristics of a blast furnace... I wouldn't worry about it. Put the drives in a data safe and you're going to be just fine.
I think you can buy an acceptable data safe almost anywhere. I was in sam's club the other day and I swear they were selling them there as well. Absent that, the internet can get one to your door in a couple days.
There are various designs. Some of them have ports in the back where you plug into the back of the safe but don't run an actual cable. The cable that connects the internal to the external ports runs through the interior of the safe and goes through lots of gaskets.
But I think the ones that let you run your own cable are probably not a lot worse so far as safety is concerned. All you have to do is keep a reasonable seal on the cables and probably have the cables go up and down in the case prior to entering the enclosure so that neither water nor hot gas can get in there.
There are lots of them like that. This is a fairly well established product and you can get similar products from several different vendors that all do the same thing.
Fire safes have been around for ages. The added feature of running a cable into the fire safe isn't a big stretch.
There are a line of fire proof safes out there that have ports that allow you to run cables into the back so you can store hard drives or SSDs or whatever in the safe... in the event of a fire, the insides of the safe should be fine.
So... that is what I would do. I'd get some external drives, buy a data safe, and then put that next to the server where upon at given intervals the data is backed up to the externals in the fire proof data safe.
My thoughts exactly. The bandwidth caps are so low and the prices are so high that honestly I'd be happier with 2G speeds and unlimited data. By all means, make it slow as shit... I just don't want to worry about the data. And if I have to worry about it then the last thing I need is for it to be so fast that I can blow through my data budget in an eye blink.
Until the business model changes radically in cellular data, we can't have faster speeds. The costs are already unreasonable at existing speeds.
Given that you're the one following me around from thread to thread in a pathetic attempt to undermine me while I have no interest in doing the same to you... you have no basis to question my emotional balance.
Perhaps this is projection on your part, mr AC?
What went wrong in your life that you get some sort of satisfaction following me around only to get donkey stomped over and over again... pretty much effortlessly. I mean, you've got pretty much an unbroken track record of failure with me.
Here you'll presume to contradict me. But on what basis? You've long ago learned never make a falsifiable argument against me because you're I'm so much smarter than you that every time you do, I almost instantly disprove your point.
Which is why you keep your comments either so vague that no one can prove or disprove them. OR you just make stupid insults.
Here is how you prove me wrong by the way: Make a falsifiable argument. And if I either don't either agree with it or disprove it then you'll have shown that in at least that case you did make such an argument and it did withstand me.
But you won't... because you're a coward.... and an idiot.
The big problem with maintaining a centralized energy grid is that renewables like wind and solar are defuse. They don't lend themselves well to big centralized power stations and make more sense just on everyone's roof.
Here is my ideal.
Everyone gets solar panels on their roofs and maybe a small wind turbine if they're in a really windy area. Possibly this stuff is bought and paid for by the government and the government will technically own the panels but they're just installed on everyone's roof.
Then you have some sort of reasonable energy buffer in every home. I don't know if we have the technology to do this properly but you want something that has a very very long life. I'm talking about something that ideally doesn't have to be replaced ever. Maybe some maintenance now and again to fix a part of but the core investment should remain very stable. Some ideas would be an air pressure tank. You could have a 1000 gallon tank, bury it in the ground, and then use a compressor to fill it up when you have excess power and than drain it through a turbine when you need power. Obviously a very good chemical battery bank would probably be ideal but they're expensive and they deteriorate. Even the lead deep cycles.
And when it comes to grid power, that power can come from nuclear, hydro electric, geothermal, etc. But solar and wind really make the most sense not in dense farms but just spread around on everyone's roof. The other nice thing about that is that you don't have to transmit most of that power. It is consumed at the point of generation which means the actual power demands of communities per person falls radically because they're mostly providing their own power.
And you could even have municipal energy storage such that the community buys power during off peak hours from the grid which further makes the system more efficient.
Energy storage is a big problem. Will Tesla's batteries solve the problem? I can't see how they could. They don't appear to do anything innovative besides just be large. That isn't good enough. They either need to be a lot cheaper or they need to last a lot longer.
I saw something on slashdot awhile ago about all liquid municipal batteries that was sort of interesting. They basically just had a giant pool or tank and the various chemicals separated out by density. There was even an insulating compound that was between the two electrolytes.
It was an interesting idea because it would be very cheap to build batteries like that. You just make a big concrete tank, possibly spray the inside with a protective coating, and then fill the tank up with the various chemical... and then leave them alone for a bit to let all the chemicals organize by density... and then stick the electrode and cathode into the relevant layer and bam... giant fucking battery.
I'm not sure what kind of corrosion would deterioration would happen. I assume you'd want to pump portions of each of the chemicals out to either be replaced or filtered, or reprocessed at some interval. If you're really efficient you would do that constantly but at about the rate the various compounds became contaminated. If you match the purification speed to the inherent contamination speed, the battery would technically be stable indefinitely.
I didn't move any goal posts. You're just repeating things you've heard before that sounded clever to you and you don't especially understand.
As to your continuing belief that the occasional grammatical error on my part confers upon you any sort of superiority... *yawn*
Beyond that you allusions to academic superiority are odd given that you've at no point demonstrated any knowledge of anything. The only one of the two of us that has done that was me. I enlightened you as to the personal character of Issac Newton of which you were entirely ignorant. And upon receiving that insight backed up with a citation because you doubted me, you then speculated that I had simply guessed a very specific piece of obscure information perfectly accurately. Apparently because your cognitive dissonance won't permit you to realize that I am and always have been your intellectual superior.
Am I rude to you? Sure... But whether someone is nice to you or not doesn't make them intelligent or not... no matter how much you'd like that to be so, dear one.
*yawn*... so stupid.:D
I assume you're the same one that has been stalking me all over slashdot, so I might as well just keep responding to you here since if I stop you'll just follow me to the next thread to make moronic comments.:P
There are dozens of video streaming sites that would sell both their testicles to have a fraction of youtube's traffic. And lets not pretend that anything youtube does is technically difficult in the 21st century. There are many competitors ready and waiting.
Soundcloud is a good example. You might also want to look at vemo or whatever that one is called. Some youtubers replicate their videos across multiple services and if youtube really decides to strap razor blades to their cock and rape the community, then they have places to go and they'll leave.
Does your absurd hubris have any bounds, little one?
As to me being clearly pissed off because I treat you poorly and respond quickly... neither of those is logically conclusive. This is what I'm talking about. You're not a rational person.
Using harsh language doesn't require that I have emotion at all. I could intentionally use very gory language with severed body parts etc and not have any hostile or murderous intent.
And as to responding quickly, you assume that an ability to respond quickly only is possible if I'm angry or upset. There is no logic for that conclusion.
As to your pathetic claim that I just got lucky when I told you something and then you asked for a link... and I was able to instantly substantiate my position. This comment on your part is so stupid that it merits no further comment. I am now starting to feel sorry for you.
Which I won't tolerate... I'm going to spend 10 seconds of meditation to hunt down and kill that portion of myself that would be so absurd as to feel compassion for you. *mediates*
There we go... clean again.
As to your association between being nice to you and being intelligent, that is the entire premise you're running on, little one. You're so illogical that you have no way of knowing not only what I am saying but what you are saying. You're a monkey that has taught how to grunt out some of his feelings but your mind isn't quite human. You don't think rationally or logically or systematically. And as such the product of your thinking is not rational much less educated.
You're a beast that has unfortunately learned how to logon to the internet. Like that cat that runs across the keyboard... you don't know what you're doing.
First, you've never made me mad and never could. You exasperate me with your stupidity.
Second, as my link showed, I didn't need to look it up because what I initially said was accurate. I told YOU something you clearly didn't know and then when you asked for a link I KINDLY provided you one. And then you have the idiotic gall to say try and turn that around and claim I needed to look it up? See, this is what I'm talking about... you're so fucking stupid.
Third, you apparently think "being nice to you" is the same thing as "being intelligent"... this is hilariously narcissistic and unworthy of any respect. Honestly, comments like yours merely vindicate my dismissiveness of you. You're such an astounding tool that no one that actually understands you could take you seriously.
We've had this discussion already APK. My adblock actually works quite well. Though if matters to you, I do add sites to my hosts file every now and then. I also use the spypot immunization list.
Your program is likely pretty cool but it is sort of a hassle to install. That is why I haven't gotten around to trying it yet.
Jesus, you don't know how to use google either? I literally typed in "Issac newton rude" and got this link almost immediately: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ro...
He was well known to be an asshole. A total genius... easily one of the most brilliant minds ever... but kind of a dick.
In any case, your premise that anyone that is educated and intelligent must be nice and respectful towards you is idiotic.
There is no logical rule that requires that an intelligent person has to be anything other than intelligent.
This is similar to those stupid arguments that Aliens have to be peaceful because they're advanced which ignores that the most advanced societies on earth are pretty fucking warlike.
You don't have a logical mind. You have a lot of feelings and ideologies and you've confused lookup tables with actual thinking.
I don't know if this is because you're stupid or if you were taught to think in a stupid way which makes you stupid. Either way, the person I am unfortunately being subjected to is not especially intelligent and it annoys me because on top of being stupid you're arrogant... so I can't even educate you. And that means you're just a waste of my time.
Worse still... you're boring... and apparently not very well read because the thing about Newton was something I learned in high school. Apparently either you weren't paying attention or your school was garbage. Either way... boring boring boring.
Shows what you know. Issac Newton was well known to have very little patience for idiots and would get rapidly rude and dismissive with people that annoyed him.
I'm not claiming I'm Issac Newton by the way, I feel the need to point that out because you're clearly an idiot. If you weren't an idiot that statement wouldn't be required.
What I am saying is that there are many examples of outright geniuses that were quite rude to morons.
I turn my adblock off most of the time. However sometimes ads are really obnoxious. I saw one that came up on every little video I wanted to watch. The ads were like 30 seconds long and you couldn't skip it... and I had seen the exact same ad 10 times in a row. So I turned adblock on because I was done looking at that ad.
I also turn it on whenever I really don't want to support the video or site. You know what I'm talking about. Sometimes you need to go to a site and hear them repeat their stupidity just so you know that whomever told you that information second hand wasn't exaggerating. And often as not they weren't and I'm quite happy they didn't get the penny or whatever they get from my click.
First, if I have offers from a competing company offering more and you refuse to negotiate then you lose.
Second, if you let me negotiate for raises then I'm going to use my superior negotiating ability to get paid more than people that suck at it. Which means this policy will accomplish absolutely dick.
So... the policy is stupid AND ineffective. Thank you for the correction. I thought it was just stupid before... now apparently it is ineffective on top of that. Hilarious.
Slashdot Mirror
Just because we hear about it doesn't mean anyone else gives a shit about.
And more to the point, just because someone sees your crap doesn't mean it will have any effect.
This is something you learn in advertising as well as politics. Just getting a lot of attention is often COMPLETELY worthless. What you want is your objective to happen.
What is that? if you are an activist for something then you want something to happen. If that thing happens because these guys are doing this... then you got me, I was wrong. If it doesn't... then this failed.
If you're selling something then you want people to actually BUY it. I get ads all the time for stuff for really old people. Like... life alert etc. I'm not remotely old enough to even begin considering such a product so marketing it to me is a waste of resources.
Politics works the same way. You have to do targeted lobbying. If some jackoffs in California are vaguely aware of your situation in Spain but don't care then exactly how does that help you? You need to put pressure on YOUR politicians in YOUR country where the ACTUAL issue is happening. My opinion or your opinion on it means DICK. Because neither of us are going to put any pressure on those politicians that are actually controlling the issue.
This is a curio at best. It appears ineffectual and faddish.
oh, if it were up to me, I'd just leave them right where they put themselves. They're all trust fund retards so they could pay someone to get them out. But that would mean their daddies would get upset.
if they just literally died there then I'd let them just decompose on the spot. Nothing would serve as a better example of the price of idiocy.
But my larger point was that this projecting crap on a wall is not impressing anyone. In china they have dudes that light themselves on fire... and die. In Australia and California they have people that put loaded guns in their mouths and blow the tops of their heads off on the capital steps.
You want to impress me? You're going to need to try harder than this crap. These guys don't know the meaning of hardcore if they think this is even remotely impressive.
http://www.costco.com/Sentry%C...
yes there are fucking millions of them.... do a google search... come on.
Oh you're not allowed to protest? Well, that's never happened before... and certainly protestors always follow the letter of the law when they're forbidden to protest.
Seriously... In California we have people show up to protests with handcuffs and gas masks. They put the gasmask on and then handcuff themselves to something.
It has become so common that police and construction workers make sure to keep a pair of bolt cutters on hand so they can cut the handcuffs off.
And the really serious protesters sometimes show up with these oil drums that they chain themselves into... and then pour cement into the drums so that you can't get their hands out unless break up the cement... which is dangerous because the jack hammer could damage their hands.
It causes a big problem. And then you have random acts of vandalism... not projecting some light on a wall... but actually splashing some paint onto said wall that expresses your message whatever that happens to be.
So yeah... projecting some light on a wall... slacktivism.
Again, the political authorities tend to take things more seriously that require more effort or guts. This shit is easy and is zero risk. It also involves not a lot of people actually having to show up.
In washington DC we have marches in the hundreds of thousands over various issues. And most of those are either ignored or go no where. Some light projected on a wall? Utterly ignorable.
Politicians respond to anything that seems harder. Why they don't respond to emails so much as letters. You mailed a letter... it is harder then popping off an email.
So a virtual protester doesn't mean much. Just saying.
It is a well established product. It is as likely to fail as your car is to not start on any given morning. The technology is quite refined and well understood.
Fire safes can typically handle fires in excess of a thousand degrees or so. If the fire gets up to blast furnace levels... then your data is likely fucked. But it is really rare for fires to get that hot. What is burning in your house is typically wood framing, furnature, carpets, drapes, etc. Airflow in a burning house is unpredictable and tends to dictate the nature of the fire. Chances are a server closet is going to have TERRIBLE airflow for a fire. They typically overheat on their own without ventilation and whatever ventilation is sufficient to keep a room like that cool is going to be far than what a raging fire would need. So... unless you're keeping your fire safe in the middle of a room designed also to have the airflow characteristics of a blast furnace... I wouldn't worry about it. Put the drives in a data safe and you're going to be just fine.
I think you can buy an acceptable data safe almost anywhere. I was in sam's club the other day and I swear they were selling them there as well. Absent that, the internet can get one to your door in a couple days.
There are various designs. Some of them have ports in the back where you plug into the back of the safe but don't run an actual cable. The cable that connects the internal to the external ports runs through the interior of the safe and goes through lots of gaskets.
But I think the ones that let you run your own cable are probably not a lot worse so far as safety is concerned. All you have to do is keep a reasonable seal on the cables and probably have the cables go up and down in the case prior to entering the enclosure so that neither water nor hot gas can get in there.
Regardless, you can look at this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
There are lots of them like that. This is a fairly well established product and you can get similar products from several different vendors that all do the same thing.
Fire safes have been around for ages. The added feature of running a cable into the fire safe isn't a big stretch.
There are a line of fire proof safes out there that have ports that allow you to run cables into the back so you can store hard drives or SSDs or whatever in the safe... in the event of a fire, the insides of the safe should be fine.
So... that is what I would do. I'd get some external drives, buy a data safe, and then put that next to the server where upon at given intervals the data is backed up to the externals in the fire proof data safe.
*yawn*
Manhattan project was the same thing (Score:4, Interesting)
*unzips pants and takes out member*
You can suck it if you want. ;-)
My thoughts exactly. The bandwidth caps are so low and the prices are so high that honestly I'd be happier with 2G speeds and unlimited data. By all means, make it slow as shit... I just don't want to worry about the data. And if I have to worry about it then the last thing I need is for it to be so fast that I can blow through my data budget in an eye blink.
Until the business model changes radically in cellular data, we can't have faster speeds. The costs are already unreasonable at existing speeds.
Given that you're the one following me around from thread to thread in a pathetic attempt to undermine me while I have no interest in doing the same to you... you have no basis to question my emotional balance.
Perhaps this is projection on your part, mr AC?
What went wrong in your life that you get some sort of satisfaction following me around only to get donkey stomped over and over again... pretty much effortlessly. I mean, you've got pretty much an unbroken track record of failure with me.
Here you'll presume to contradict me. But on what basis? You've long ago learned never make a falsifiable argument against me because you're I'm so much smarter than you that every time you do, I almost instantly disprove your point.
Which is why you keep your comments either so vague that no one can prove or disprove them. OR you just make stupid insults.
Here is how you prove me wrong by the way: Make a falsifiable argument. And if I either don't either agree with it or disprove it then you'll have shown that in at least that case you did make such an argument and it did withstand me.
But you won't... because you're a coward.... and an idiot.
The big problem with maintaining a centralized energy grid is that renewables like wind and solar are defuse. They don't lend themselves well to big centralized power stations and make more sense just on everyone's roof.
Here is my ideal.
Everyone gets solar panels on their roofs and maybe a small wind turbine if they're in a really windy area. Possibly this stuff is bought and paid for by the government and the government will technically own the panels but they're just installed on everyone's roof.
Then you have some sort of reasonable energy buffer in every home. I don't know if we have the technology to do this properly but you want something that has a very very long life. I'm talking about something that ideally doesn't have to be replaced ever. Maybe some maintenance now and again to fix a part of but the core investment should remain very stable. Some ideas would be an air pressure tank. You could have a 1000 gallon tank, bury it in the ground, and then use a compressor to fill it up when you have excess power and than drain it through a turbine when you need power. Obviously a very good chemical battery bank would probably be ideal but they're expensive and they deteriorate. Even the lead deep cycles.
And when it comes to grid power, that power can come from nuclear, hydro electric, geothermal, etc. But solar and wind really make the most sense not in dense farms but just spread around on everyone's roof. The other nice thing about that is that you don't have to transmit most of that power. It is consumed at the point of generation which means the actual power demands of communities per person falls radically because they're mostly providing their own power.
And you could even have municipal energy storage such that the community buys power during off peak hours from the grid which further makes the system more efficient.
Energy storage is a big problem. Will Tesla's batteries solve the problem? I can't see how they could. They don't appear to do anything innovative besides just be large. That isn't good enough. They either need to be a lot cheaper or they need to last a lot longer.
I saw something on slashdot awhile ago about all liquid municipal batteries that was sort of interesting. They basically just had a giant pool or tank and the various chemicals separated out by density. There was even an insulating compound that was between the two electrolytes.
It was an interesting idea because it would be very cheap to build batteries like that. You just make a big concrete tank, possibly spray the inside with a protective coating, and then fill the tank up with the various chemical... and then leave them alone for a bit to let all the chemicals organize by density... and then stick the electrode and cathode into the relevant layer and bam... giant fucking battery.
I'm not sure what kind of corrosion would deterioration would happen. I assume you'd want to pump portions of each of the chemicals out to either be replaced or filtered, or reprocessed at some interval. If you're really efficient you would do that constantly but at about the rate the various compounds became contaminated. If you match the purification speed to the inherent contamination speed, the battery would technically be stable indefinitely.
More mindless insults after being outwitted AGAIN?
You are a sad sad monkey.
I didn't move any goal posts. You're just repeating things you've heard before that sounded clever to you and you don't especially understand.
As to your continuing belief that the occasional grammatical error on my part confers upon you any sort of superiority... *yawn*
Beyond that you allusions to academic superiority are odd given that you've at no point demonstrated any knowledge of anything. The only one of the two of us that has done that was me. I enlightened you as to the personal character of Issac Newton of which you were entirely ignorant. And upon receiving that insight backed up with a citation because you doubted me, you then speculated that I had simply guessed a very specific piece of obscure information perfectly accurately. Apparently because your cognitive dissonance won't permit you to realize that I am and always have been your intellectual superior.
Am I rude to you? Sure... But whether someone is nice to you or not doesn't make them intelligent or not... no matter how much you'd like that to be so, dear one.
*yawn*... so stupid. :D
I assume you're the same one that has been stalking me all over slashdot, so I might as well just keep responding to you here since if I stop you'll just follow me to the next thread to make moronic comments. :P
There are dozens of video streaming sites that would sell both their testicles to have a fraction of youtube's traffic. And lets not pretend that anything youtube does is technically difficult in the 21st century. There are many competitors ready and waiting.
Soundcloud is a good example. You might also want to look at vemo or whatever that one is called. Some youtubers replicate their videos across multiple services and if youtube really decides to strap razor blades to their cock and rape the community, then they have places to go and they'll leave.
You claim to be a mind reader now? *yawn*
Does your absurd hubris have any bounds, little one?
As to me being clearly pissed off because I treat you poorly and respond quickly... neither of those is logically conclusive. This is what I'm talking about. You're not a rational person.
Using harsh language doesn't require that I have emotion at all. I could intentionally use very gory language with severed body parts etc and not have any hostile or murderous intent.
And as to responding quickly, you assume that an ability to respond quickly only is possible if I'm angry or upset. There is no logic for that conclusion.
As to your pathetic claim that I just got lucky when I told you something and then you asked for a link... and I was able to instantly substantiate my position. This comment on your part is so stupid that it merits no further comment. I am now starting to feel sorry for you.
Which I won't tolerate... I'm going to spend 10 seconds of meditation to hunt down and kill that portion of myself that would be so absurd as to feel compassion for you. *mediates*
There we go... clean again.
As to your association between being nice to you and being intelligent, that is the entire premise you're running on, little one. You're so illogical that you have no way of knowing not only what I am saying but what you are saying. You're a monkey that has taught how to grunt out some of his feelings but your mind isn't quite human. You don't think rationally or logically or systematically. And as such the product of your thinking is not rational much less educated.
You're a beast that has unfortunately learned how to logon to the internet. Like that cat that runs across the keyboard... you don't know what you're doing.
If you want burger flippers writing your code, then go for it.
First, you've never made me mad and never could. You exasperate me with your stupidity.
Second, as my link showed, I didn't need to look it up because what I initially said was accurate. I told YOU something you clearly didn't know and then when you asked for a link I KINDLY provided you one. And then you have the idiotic gall to say try and turn that around and claim I needed to look it up? See, this is what I'm talking about... you're so fucking stupid.
Third, you apparently think "being nice to you" is the same thing as "being intelligent"... this is hilariously narcissistic and unworthy of any respect. Honestly, comments like yours merely vindicate my dismissiveness of you. You're such an astounding tool that no one that actually understands you could take you seriously.
We've had this discussion already APK. My adblock actually works quite well. Though if matters to you, I do add sites to my hosts file every now and then. I also use the spypot immunization list.
Your program is likely pretty cool but it is sort of a hassle to install. That is why I haven't gotten around to trying it yet.
Anyway... regards :D
Jesus, you don't know how to use google either? I literally typed in "Issac newton rude" and got this link almost immediately:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ro...
He was well known to be an asshole. A total genius... easily one of the most brilliant minds ever... but kind of a dick.
In any case, your premise that anyone that is educated and intelligent must be nice and respectful towards you is idiotic.
There is no logical rule that requires that an intelligent person has to be anything other than intelligent.
This is similar to those stupid arguments that Aliens have to be peaceful because they're advanced which ignores that the most advanced societies on earth are pretty fucking warlike.
You don't have a logical mind. You have a lot of feelings and ideologies and you've confused lookup tables with actual thinking.
I don't know if this is because you're stupid or if you were taught to think in a stupid way which makes you stupid. Either way, the person I am unfortunately being subjected to is not especially intelligent and it annoys me because on top of being stupid you're arrogant... so I can't even educate you. And that means you're just a waste of my time.
Worse still... you're boring... and apparently not very well read because the thing about Newton was something I learned in high school. Apparently either you weren't paying attention or your school was garbage. Either way... boring boring boring.
youtube is annoying youtubers lately. There is a possibility they'll be an exodus if they annoy them enough.
Wow you're stupid. My point was that even if you were right on that point you'd be making an irrelevant point to the central argument.
My point was to show you that it is heads I win and tails you lose.
Heads I win because my argument is right and heads you lose because you're arguing you yourself are wrong.
Idiot.
Fuck off.
Shows what you know. Issac Newton was well known to have very little patience for idiots and would get rapidly rude and dismissive with people that annoyed him.
I'm not claiming I'm Issac Newton by the way, I feel the need to point that out because you're clearly an idiot. If you weren't an idiot that statement wouldn't be required.
What I am saying is that there are many examples of outright geniuses that were quite rude to morons.
So you're wrong and go fuck yourself.
I turn my adblock off most of the time. However sometimes ads are really obnoxious. I saw one that came up on every little video I wanted to watch. The ads were like 30 seconds long and you couldn't skip it... and I had seen the exact same ad 10 times in a row. So I turned adblock on because I was done looking at that ad.
I also turn it on whenever I really don't want to support the video or site. You know what I'm talking about. Sometimes you need to go to a site and hear them repeat their stupidity just so you know that whomever told you that information second hand wasn't exaggerating. And often as not they weren't and I'm quite happy they didn't get the penny or whatever they get from my click.
First, if I have offers from a competing company offering more and you refuse to negotiate then you lose.
Second, if you let me negotiate for raises then I'm going to use my superior negotiating ability to get paid more than people that suck at it. Which means this policy will accomplish absolutely dick.
So... the policy is stupid AND ineffective. Thank you for the correction. I thought it was just stupid before... now apparently it is ineffective on top of that. Hilarious.