where on earth is the sexism of this topic shining through? please englighten us all.
if the author had not mentioned "wife" and instead used "partner" perhaps we would nto even know their gender (although, i'd guess everyone else would assume male).
What if sexual arousal and language were related? "romance" languages of the computer age.
actually honestly... i dont really see this as news either... and i'm wondering whether it is more important than ananything else
they could have posted..but..
that they could have put but you have to admit it is a good question... but more importantly i do not see this as sexist at all. Women have sex too you know... and sex in itself is not an immature topic. Sure, it seems to be presented in a sort of immature sort of medium-intelligent-male point of view but it also asks a question that i'm sure like many other/.'ers i did not know the awnser to.
but sex, in itself, is not immature, nor rude.
the real lameness would be refusing to post such an oddball unnexpected topic
i mean, does it go to the artists (in which case, are we going to be looking at richcer Celine Dion, Rod Stewart and Bryan addams?)...i mean i would even understand a tax on such CDs if artists were fairly repaid for their spent money on this tax (i sold way over 100$ worth of copies of my CD...and i wasnt even trying to...with this tax i would have easily plunged 25$ of that into this tax!)...but i seriously anyone will get any money from this, except for perhaps the above mentioned 3 canadian 'talents'.
you mean the CIA HASNT been wiretapping me for the past 6 months (or at least scince i've joined what used to be an international/internet terrorist orginization...or at least listening to pirate radio?...surely either the CIA or CSIS has been on notice of me for quite some time:)
oh yea and i agree... i'll bake cookies for anyone who can prove they killed bill gates and or took down everything microsoft offline for at least a week. (mmm...home baked cookies)
i'm feeling a hint of sarcasm there.
this is free expression...art at its finest.
i *wish* i could do this
*refrains from flaming...just this once because he's in a good mood*...oh..pfa
are they making money on zelda any more?...i mean i'm sure a few people are buying the old NES consoles still but nothing compared to the majority.
and even if your nations laws "did" at one time realize that such anthing was right or wrong...technology has changed the reality and definition of right and wrong. look around. we arent in the 19th century any more.
"moderate me. you know you want to"
-
themusicgod1
Slashdot Mirror
where on earth is the sexism of this topic shining through? please englighten us all.
if the author had not mentioned "wife" and instead used "partner" perhaps we would nto even know their gender (although, i'd guess everyone else would assume male).
What if sexual arousal and language were related? "romance" languages of the computer age.
actually honestly... i dont really see this as news either... and i'm wondering whether it is more important than ananything else they could have posted..but.. that they could have put but you have to admit it is a good question... but more importantly i do not see this as sexist at all. Women have sex too you know... and sex in itself is not an immature topic. Sure, it seems to be presented in a sort of immature sort of medium-intelligent-male point of view but it also asks a question that i'm sure like many other /.'ers i did not know the awnser to.
but sex, in itself, is not immature, nor rude.
the real lameness would be refusing to post such an oddball unnexpected topic
do you have a link?
elections were in octobre, i was born in decembre...
:(
lol...
too bad i dont really have 1k$ to spend...
i'm stuck in a hicktown who's represented by a far right psychochristian from the CRAP party who could care less about guys like me...
thanks for the thought though, i'll make note of it to anyone else...
i mean, does it go to the artists (in which case, are we going to be looking at richcer Celine Dion, Rod Stewart and Bryan addams?)...i mean i would even understand a tax on such CDs if artists were fairly repaid for their spent money on this tax (i sold way over 100$ worth of copies of my CD...and i wasnt even trying to...with this tax i would have easily plunged 25$ of that into this tax!)...but i seriously anyone will get any money from this, except for perhaps the above mentioned 3 canadian 'talents'.
i allready dont make any money and it costs around 4$ per cd
on the other hand the Canadian government dosn't really care about their starving canadian artists...
got it?
i cant afford another computer right now, but when i do i will make it a linux box.
you mean the CIA HASNT been wiretapping me for the past 6 months (or at least scince i've joined what used to be an international/internet terrorist orginization ...or at least listening to pirate radio?...surely either the CIA or CSIS has been on notice of me for quite some time :)
oh yea and i agree... i'll bake cookies for anyone who can prove they killed bill gates and or took down everything microsoft offline for at least a week. (mmm...home baked cookies)
I would expect something like this out of Microsoft Internet Explorer,..but Netscape?
*starts using IE*
oh well soon i will be using LYNX and i wont have to deal with either
the purpose of broadband is for streaming realtime descent quality Video. other things come on as a bonus.
Ahmen!
i'm feeling a hint of sarcasm there. this is free expression...art at its finest. i *wish* i could do this ...oh ..pfa
are they making money on zelda any more?...i mean i'm sure a few people are buying the old NES consoles still but nothing compared to the majority.
and even if your nations laws "did" at one time realize that such anthing was right or wrong...technology has changed the reality and definition of right and wrong. look around. we arent in the 19th century any more.
"moderate me. you know you want to"
*refrains from flaming...just this once because he's in a good mood*
-
themusicgod1