Okay...you're an utter idiot with no brain and poorly educated and not well read. Therefore, I deem you not worthy of living. We will come and harvest ALL your stem cells tomorrow and bury the rest of you in the ground.
There is no ban on stem cell research. In fact Bush funded such research. The ban is in harvesting fetal stem cells only. Which is of questionable ethics and unnecessary.
a) Bush Administration is the first administration to Federally fund stem cell research, just not fetal stem cell research.
b) This is further proof that the Bush Administration's stance was correct, fetal stem cell research is not necessary. In fact, every success I have read about in the past year has been non-fetal stem cells.
Yes...but thankfully he is less of a moron than you are....ignorant buffoon. You do realize:
a) Bush Administration is the first administration to Federally fund stem cell research, just not fetal stem cell research.
b) This is further proof that the Bush Administration's stance was correct, fetal stem cell research is not necessary. In fact, every success I have read about in the past year has been non-fetal stem cells.
a) Bush Administration is the first administration to Federally fund stem cell research
b) This is further proof that the Bush Administration's stance was correct, fetal stem cell research is not necessary. In fact, every success I have read about in the past year has been non-fetal stem cells.
c) Please go educate yourself....thank you.
d) your point on them not knowing is potentially accurate and a good point, although it's very likely they "extracted" "tested" "re-inserted"
Everyone has to remember that Netflix is reliant on a second company. USPO and that company has it's problems. I noticed a slow down around Christmas time on delivery and return.
We had a problem (my neighbor and I) where it was taking unusually long for our Netflix movies to get returned. Apparently, the post man did not see anything wrong with watching the movies before delivering them.
Almost all of these games were made in the 80's. They are cultural icons and history. They should ALL have been put in public domain by now and would have if copyright laws had been kept as intended by the framers.
So frankly, I really have very little sympathy. Although, I respect the guy for actually having endeavored to legally bring back many of the classics.
For example, we had several major solar flares. Just curious...what affect that had?
Sure...the solar flare is usually colder than the sun. But it weakens the magnetic field of the earth. That can allow more charged (heated) particles to collide with the earth. What affect does that have?
Furthermore, we know from our paleontology books it was much hotter before. And we know there was an ocean in the middle of north america. Gee...so if this warming occurred before we can only conclude that:
"The dinosaurs died because of global warming due to mankind."
I think it's because the scientific community has become more and more a fanatical religious zealot unwilling to hear anything different than the papal pontification. And often ignoring blatant facts of historical evidence and endeavoring to repeatedly cover up their past failings.
Mind you, there once was an ocean in central north america....
As I understand it, i think China may now be consuming more oil than the U.S., think I read something about that recently.
Kyoto is simply a treaty design to impede the more advanced nations while letting lesser developed nations continue unchecked.
America has already greatly reduced it's emissions since it's industrial hey dey. Furthermore, we developed much of the technology to allow such. Therefore, these lesser-industrialized companies do not need to re-invent the wheel and can advance accordingly.
Yes...what scientist wants to come out against the indoctrinated religious pontification and make an anti-environmental blasphemous statement that although humans are likely to blame in part for the warming, that this could be a natural trend.
Solar temperature fluctuation, orbital fluctuation, who knows....
Should we reduce emissions yes....but let's get off the fanatic religious belief of mass scientology...
There used to be an ocean in the middle of North America.
There are records that show thru out geo-history great freezings and greater warmings.
Yes, I know we have millions of cows releasing flatulants...but didn't we have millions of buffalo before we killed all of them? So that kinda balances out.
Have we released green house gases. Yes. Have they had an affect. Probably....but when you read how black the skies were in London 200 yrs ago from all the wood burning and carbon emissions.
And so although I believe there could be a global warming I am very skeptical about whether that is due just because of mankind or natural occurrences.
The main issue with B5 was the doubt in season 5. So they cut all the minor sub-plots and basically ended it in season 4. And then did the follow-up on season 5.
But all things considered he did a good job of pulling the rabbit out of the hat on that.
And if you've watched Jeremiah it is one of those slow paced shows but where you feel everything is getting entangled and what you first thought is not what you now think and you are left wondering "what will I think in season 2?"
second you're thinking too much in your own sandbox
did you ever think they might not make their paper the same way as we do?
in fact, in the future if I were to make paper I would not use rolls as we do. I would use a solid bar (think a 10" octagonal tube) and cut it on a molecular level into individual sheets.
I would then collect all of this "paper" and have it pressed back into a pillar and recycle it. v
"embedded in a universe of increasing entropy" [[[Can't be true. Not without a God. You can't tell me we live in a world that has been obersved to have much order in it. And tell me it is increasingly becoming entropic. And then tell me it evolved to order.
So either it had to be put into order at some point. Or there must some manifestation of anti-entropy (hey great new term for Rick Berman to use in his next Trek-massacre...although I am actually starting to like Enterprise). ]]]
We have an entire system that essentially won't discuss the concept of a God or creator within education. So they are taught....so they will believe.
To look at the genetic code and discount that there could in no way be any intelligent design involved (whether God, aliens, or the tooth fairy) is really a foolish and unscientific position to take.
All atheists are arrogant fools who have no right of claim to the title 'scientist'. Agnostics, or those who simply say "I don't know one way or the other" are much more honest and truer scientists.
Slashdot Mirror
Well....
In the past year i've read a dozen articles on stem-cell successes. ALL have been adult or umbilical.
I have yet to read a single success of embryonic stem cells. Most of what I have heard about them is the tests result in tumors.
Hey moron....
No it can't....
In fact, most embryonic stem cell research has failed because it is hyper-activated and not stable enough.
Nearly all the successes have come from bone marrow, umbilical, etc.
So why kill needlessly when the same thing can be accomplished without it.
If you still insist one killing needlessly...than yes...please die blind.
And no I am not a heartless bastard. Half my family is diabetic and I will be too...
Okay...you're an utter idiot with no brain and poorly educated and not well read. Therefore, I deem you not worthy of living. We will come and harvest ALL your stem cells tomorrow and bury the rest of you in the ground.
There is no ban on stem cell research. In fact Bush funded such research. The ban is in harvesting fetal stem cells only. Which is of questionable ethics and unnecessary.
a) Bush Administration is the first administration to Federally fund stem cell research, just not fetal stem cell research.
b) This is further proof that the Bush Administration's stance was correct, fetal stem cell research is not necessary. In fact, every success I have read about in the past year has been non-fetal stem cells.
c) Please go educate yourself....thank you.
Yes...but thankfully he is less of a moron than you are....ignorant buffoon. You do realize:
a) Bush Administration is the first administration to Federally fund stem cell research, just not fetal stem cell research.
b) This is further proof that the Bush Administration's stance was correct, fetal stem cell research is not necessary. In fact, every success I have read about in the past year has been non-fetal stem cells.
c) Please go educate yourself....thank you.
Nothing wrong with having stem cells harvested from the cord. The only issue with stem cell harvesting is when it involves the loss of life.
Human life should not be saved at the cost of human life....(lest one day poor humans will be harvested to keep the powerful immortal)
You're a retard...
a) Bush Administration is the first administration to Federally fund stem cell research
b) This is further proof that the Bush Administration's stance was correct, fetal stem cell research is not necessary. In fact, every success I have read about in the past year has been non-fetal stem cells.
c) Please go educate yourself....thank you.
d) your point on them not knowing is potentially accurate and a good point, although it's very likely they "extracted" "tested" "re-inserted"
Everyone has to remember that Netflix is reliant on a second company. USPO and that company has it's problems. I noticed a slow down around Christmas time on delivery and return.
Check your "post office"...
We had a problem (my neighbor and I) where it was taking unusually long for our Netflix movies to get returned. Apparently, the post man did not see anything wrong with watching the movies before delivering them.
Almost all of these games were made in the 80's. They are cultural icons and history. They should ALL have been put in public domain by now and would have if copyright laws had been kept as intended by the framers.
So frankly, I really have very little sympathy. Although, I respect the guy for actually having endeavored to legally bring back many of the classics.
All logical fallacies, ad-hominens, etc...
Not a shred of evidence for the argument...although i believe there is some valid evidence.
Yup...
For example, we had several major solar flares. Just curious...what affect that had?
Sure...the solar flare is usually colder than the sun. But it weakens the magnetic field of the earth. That can allow more charged (heated) particles to collide with the earth. What affect does that have?
Furthermore, we know from our paleontology books it was much hotter before. And we know there was an ocean in the middle of north america. Gee...so if this warming occurred before we can only conclude that:
"The dinosaurs died because of global warming due to mankind."
And one must remember that numerous places have had record low temperatures and freezing winters. (Like the NE.)
In fact, I have read more about "cold" than hot in articles about climate in the world as of late.
Now set the room spinning....
Ask yourself why there are cases of sand over there and over there....
Far outside your few meter estimates....
Now tell me once again why you are accurate?
I think it's because the scientific community has become more and more a fanatical religious zealot unwilling to hear anything different than the papal pontification. And often ignoring blatant facts of historical evidence and endeavoring to repeatedly cover up their past failings.
Mind you, there once was an ocean in central north america....
As I understand it, i think China may now be consuming more oil than the U.S., think I read something about that recently.
Kyoto is simply a treaty design to impede the more advanced nations while letting lesser developed nations continue unchecked.
America has already greatly reduced it's emissions since it's industrial hey dey. Furthermore, we developed much of the technology to allow such. Therefore, these lesser-industrialized companies do not need to re-invent the wheel and can advance accordingly.
Yes...what scientist wants to come out against the indoctrinated religious pontification and make an anti-environmental blasphemous statement that although humans are likely to blame in part for the warming, that this could be a natural trend.
Solar temperature fluctuation, orbital fluctuation, who knows....
Should we reduce emissions yes....but let's get off the fanatic religious belief of mass scientology...
Really...
And we know that in various times there has been MUCH warmer and MUCH colder periods.
We know areas covered in ice weren't and areas not have been covered in ice.
So how can you tell me we're so much HOTTER than ever before?
Let me see...
There used to be an ocean in the middle of North America.
There are records that show thru out geo-history great freezings and greater warmings.
Yes, I know we have millions of cows releasing flatulants...but didn't we have millions of buffalo before we killed all of them? So that kinda balances out.
Have we released green house gases. Yes. Have they had an affect. Probably....but when you read how black the skies were in London 200 yrs ago from all the wood burning and carbon emissions.
And so although I believe there could be a global warming I am very skeptical about whether that is due just because of mankind or natural occurrences.
Knock! Knock!
Who's there?
SCO!
SCO who?
The main issue with B5 was the doubt in season 5. So they cut all the minor sub-plots and basically ended it in season 4. And then did the follow-up on season 5.
But all things considered he did a good job of pulling the rabbit out of the hat on that.
And if you've watched Jeremiah it is one of those slow paced shows but where you feel everything is getting entangled and what you first thought is not what you now think and you are left wondering "what will I think in season 2?"
"Slashdot Online has an article up today entitled 'Readers astonished by Slashdot's repost of SCO's lack of evidence against IBM'. From the article:
very good recycling....
second you're thinking too much in your own sandbox
did you ever think they might not make their paper the same way as we do?
in fact, in the future if I were to make paper I would not use rolls as we do. I would use a solid bar (think a 10" octagonal tube) and cut it on a molecular level into individual sheets.
I would then collect all of this "paper" and have it pressed back into a pillar and recycle it. v
Vwallaaa....high efficiency paper usage.
Think man...think...be creative!
You know...we all want it...
We all want the episode with Dirk Benedict playing some old fighter jockey and being like "I used to go by the call name Starbuck myself."
And outflying her....
It'd be a slight vindication...
"embedded in a universe of increasing entropy"
[[[Can't be true. Not without a God. You can't tell me we live in a world that has been obersved to have much order in it. And tell me it is increasingly becoming entropic. And then tell me it evolved to order.
So either it had to be put into order at some point. Or there must some manifestation of anti-entropy (hey great new term for Rick Berman to use in his next Trek-massacre...although I am actually starting to like Enterprise).
]]]
Educated or indoctrinated?
We have an entire system that essentially won't discuss the concept of a God or creator within education. So they are taught....so they will believe.
To look at the genetic code and discount that there could in no way be any intelligent design involved (whether God, aliens, or the tooth fairy) is really a foolish and unscientific position to take.
All atheists are arrogant fools who have no right of claim to the title 'scientist'. Agnostics, or those who simply say "I don't know one way or the other" are much more honest and truer scientists.