Because, doing 1 vaccine every few months is less likely to cause risk to the life and well being of the child. Then to be lazy and give them 8-12 in a six month period.
First off, I've gotten off my ass and read about 50 sites on this crap. What you posted has zero informative benefit. You're telling me what I already know. FDA first rejected because testing were mostly focused on the young. Then declared the follow up data on older patients to insufficient.
But take your head our your arse and think for a moment. Proven safe for mandatory vaccination in children. Shown equally safe in a smaller subset of adults. Building on an already established clause. Has been shown to have several benefits for older adults.
And the reason to not expand it....
Seriously, I don't think there should be any vaccine that a child can be mandated while telling the parent it's not safe enough for them.
***
And yes, a few doctors will prescribe it, but it's damn hard to find one.
If he dismisses it becauce he believes the complication rate is 1 in a 1000. And every time there is any incident, dismisses it for that reason. He is, creating his own false dichotomy.
Actually no, I just call BS on your implementation of science.
-----
Okay, so let's be a little bit more honest.
HPV vaccine, it's now REQUIRED by some states at urging of FDA. And yet, my wife who is 27, is unable to get the vaccine. Nor am I...
So the FDA feels that vaccines are safe enough to push for mandates for my kids; but then is afraid to let me take it.
Seriously Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot!?!
***
As for the science, well considering how few vaccine related incidents are ever even attributed to vaccines. I am skeptical, the analysis can be right. But if the data is poor, the science means very little.
My daughter received a multi-vaccine for resperatory diseases (croup and diphtherea). Within 24 hours we were in the ER with my 18 month old getting breathing treatments. I bet you $50 even though I submitted that incident to VARS, that it's not associated or listed. Even though the fact is, it was clearly a 'possible vaccine related illness'. No, I am not saying it's a 100% assured to have been vaccine related. But the causality argument for it is pretty strong.
But here's what happens. Doctors believe that there is almost no vaccine related issue. So when they're presented with an issue that is probably vaccine related. They dismiss it. And so the data is a very very poor sampling.
So sorry, I am pro-science. Pro-vaccine. Just have issue with how the FDA handles and mandates some of them. And even more issue with the fact that we give 18 month old immune systems up to 6 vaccines in a single office visit.
And if you think that's a scienfically smart practice. You need to pull your head out of the textbook which is stuck in your arse.
Insanity, factors into, what one does after one loses a crazy case. Do you take...or do you start singing "We're not going to take it!" and suddenly find yourself wearing a V for Vendetta mask.
Just remember, employees are normal people, often who dislike their companies' own policies but have need of a bread check. Don't take vengeance out upon innocents.;-)
Likewise, another argument. I email every one who send me email, that in order to do so, they are subject to a license agreement in which their very souls become my possession, and all material possessions - and since companies are people too, they are subject as well.
Since Adobe sent me an email after I sent them the license notification. They are now subject to my license terms. Yes, it's stupid. But it's essentially what EULAs do.
I click, because if I am ever sued over an EULA, I will demand a jury. And demand that the jury read the EULA. I will then provide them an updated EULA before the trial is over. And demand they read that as well. If I feel the jury is still, not convinced of the fact that EULAs should be non-enforceable. I will provide a third update.
If I lose my case, then I know this world is so utterly insane....that what I do doesn't really matter. And I will ensure the publisher of the EULA is eradicated from this insane holo-simulation.
Like voting in President Obama got us out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and shut down Gitmo. (For those who think Obama is responsible for departing Iraq, do some research... we left on the withdrawal date President Bush signed. And Obama actually tried to keep troops, but the Iraqi government refused and had the legal weight to do so thanks to George Bush.)
Oh, and all that shale, fracking, and what not has stopped since Obama was elected.
Oh, and now all GMO food products have labels thanks to President Obama.
FIrst off, the Jewish population in the region grew fairly concurrently with the Palestinian. Go back 200 years and neither population was very large.
Second, much of the land was actually purchased by the owning parties.
Thirdly, you may be right. There are probably some who lost their homes from 1948 (but remember, it wasn't the Jews that attacked and declared they were going to push them all into the sea). So if you pick a fight, and lose....don't bitch about it.
Fourth, and lastly, hundreds of thousands of Jews were likewise displaced from surrounding Arab nations in which they had lived for centuries.
Oh, let's add a fifth. Jewish controlled territory is 1/1,000th of Muslim controlled territory. Can't the muslim fucking share a bit of land without demanding the genocide and death of a people?
I said, Jews, because that's what the Palestinians say.
And might I add, that while Jews live all over the world. (We have more in America than in Israel.), So do Muslims.
But Jews only control one small 1/1,000th of territory compared to Muslims.
And so everythign I said was quite valid.
"Jews can live in most Muslim majority countries as well."
No no-muslims can live in muslim territories without persecution. That's why Islamic nations are at war EVERYWHERE they exist, and don't have total control. (Middle East, Indian, Philipines, Thailand, Africa, etc, etc)
Um, wait, the Jews were ethnically cleansed from their ancestral homeland. Oh, and let's not forget, that the Jewish population has grown in conjunction with the Palestinian population over the past 150 years.
It was really just when the "control" of the land changed, not the population. You see, fundamentalist Muslims cannot let muslim controlled territory revert to non-muslims.
Imagine what would have happened, if Anonymous started hitting Palestinian sites as soon as they launched missiles? and then hit any news coverege sites.
Slashdot Mirror
Because, doing 1 vaccine every few months is less likely to cause risk to the life and well being of the child. Then to be lazy and give them 8-12 in a six month period.
First off, I've gotten off my ass and read about 50 sites on this crap. What you posted has zero informative benefit. You're telling me what I already know. FDA first rejected because testing were mostly focused on the young. Then declared the follow up data on older patients to insufficient.
But take your head our your arse and think for a moment. Proven safe for mandatory vaccination in children. Shown equally safe in a smaller subset of adults. Building on an already established clause. Has been shown to have several benefits for older adults.
And the reason to not expand it....
Seriously, I don't think there should be any vaccine that a child can be mandated while telling the parent it's not safe enough for them.
***
And yes, a few doctors will prescribe it, but it's damn hard to find one.
Wrong...
If he dismisses it becauce he believes the complication rate is 1 in a 1000. And every time there is any incident, dismisses it for that reason. He is, creating his own false dichotomy.
I agree...
I'm not sold on the autism issue, but I think there are other links and concerns often overlooked.
You do realize, that a LOT of these "re-surgent" diseases. Have hit those who were already immunized...
Especially 6 vaccines at once...
Wait...so keep your vaccines away from our children. Cause you have no right to harm my children either.
Your logic is fail...
So how about we reverse this...
You have HIV or other disease... we lock you in your house, if you come out. We shoot you.
Same logic, but I'll bet you'll be outraged by that option.
And this is going to cease just because the government got involved?
Actually no, I just call BS on your implementation of science.
-----
Okay, so let's be a little bit more honest.
HPV vaccine, it's now REQUIRED by some states at urging of FDA. And yet, my wife who is 27, is unable to get the vaccine. Nor am I...
So the FDA feels that vaccines are safe enough to push for mandates for my kids; but then is afraid to let me take it.
Seriously Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot!?!
***
As for the science, well considering how few vaccine related incidents are ever even attributed to vaccines. I am skeptical, the analysis can be right. But if the data is poor, the science means very little.
My daughter received a multi-vaccine for resperatory diseases (croup and diphtherea). Within 24 hours we were in the ER with my 18 month old getting breathing treatments. I bet you $50 even though I submitted that incident to VARS, that it's not associated or listed. Even though the fact is, it was clearly a 'possible vaccine related illness'. No, I am not saying it's a 100% assured to have been vaccine related. But the causality argument for it is pretty strong.
But here's what happens. Doctors believe that there is almost no vaccine related issue. So when they're presented with an issue that is probably vaccine related. They dismiss it. And so the data is a very very poor sampling.
So sorry, I am pro-science. Pro-vaccine. Just have issue with how the FDA handles and mandates some of them. And even more issue with the fact that we give 18 month old immune systems up to 6 vaccines in a single office visit.
And if you think that's a scienfically smart practice. You need to pull your head out of the textbook which is stuck in your arse.
Honestly, I think Apple's iTunes is FAR worse than Adobe.
Adobe downloads in seconds - iTunes downloads a 100 times the data. Plus always wants "new" versions of QuickTime and what not.
Much agreed...
Insanity, factors into, what one does after one loses a crazy case. Do you take...or do you start singing "We're not going to take it!" and suddenly find yourself wearing a V for Vendetta mask.
Just remember, employees are normal people, often who dislike their companies' own policies but have need of a bread check. Don't take vengeance out upon innocents. ;-)
Likewise, another argument. I email every one who send me email, that in order to do so, they are subject to a license agreement in which their very souls become my possession, and all material possessions - and since companies are people too, they are subject as well.
Since Adobe sent me an email after I sent them the license notification. They are now subject to my license terms. Yes, it's stupid. But it's essentially what EULAs do.
I click, because if I am ever sued over an EULA, I will demand a jury. And demand that the jury read the EULA. I will then provide them an updated EULA before the trial is over. And demand they read that as well. If I feel the jury is still, not convinced of the fact that EULAs should be non-enforceable. I will provide a third update.
If I lose my case, then I know this world is so utterly insane....that what I do doesn't really matter. And I will ensure the publisher of the EULA is eradicated from this insane holo-simulation.
The Democrat Party today is likewise unrecognizable. In fact, JFK would have a lot more in common with Republicans of today than Democrats.
That about equates to NYC. ;-)
Right...
Like voting in President Obama got us out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and shut down Gitmo.
(For those who think Obama is responsible for departing Iraq, do some research... we left on the withdrawal date President Bush signed. And Obama actually tried to keep troops, but the Iraqi government refused and had the legal weight to do so thanks to George Bush.)
Oh, and all that shale, fracking, and what not has stopped since Obama was elected.
Oh, and now all GMO food products have labels thanks to President Obama.
Should I go on?
It's been over a 1/4 century, and this is just getting done.
WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT
Modded to a 0, but I'd like to see anyone discount what I just stated...
Thank you for proving that "lefties" like to pick and choose their science too.
So, let's look at things....
FIrst off, the Jewish population in the region grew fairly concurrently with the Palestinian. Go back 200 years and neither population was very large.
Second, much of the land was actually purchased by the owning parties.
Thirdly, you may be right. There are probably some who lost their homes from 1948 (but remember, it wasn't the Jews that attacked and declared they were going to push them all into the sea). So if you pick a fight, and lose....don't bitch about it.
Fourth, and lastly, hundreds of thousands of Jews were likewise displaced from surrounding Arab nations in which they had lived for centuries.
Oh, let's add a fifth. Jewish controlled territory is 1/1,000th of Muslim controlled territory. Can't the muslim fucking share a bit of land without demanding the genocide and death of a people?
I said, Jews, because that's what the Palestinians say.
And might I add, that while Jews live all over the world. (We have more in America than in Israel.), So do Muslims.
But Jews only control one small 1/1,000th of territory compared to Muslims.
And so everythign I said was quite valid.
"Jews can live in most Muslim majority countries as well."
No no-muslims can live in muslim territories without persecution. That's why Islamic nations are at war EVERYWHERE they exist, and don't have total control. (Middle East, Indian, Philipines, Thailand, Africa, etc, etc)
Um, wait, the Jews were ethnically cleansed from their ancestral homeland. Oh, and let's not forget, that the Jewish population has grown in conjunction with the Palestinian population over the past 150 years.
It was really just when the "control" of the land changed, not the population. You see, fundamentalist Muslims cannot let muslim controlled territory revert to non-muslims.
Imagine what would have happened, if Anonymous started hitting Palestinian sites as soon as they launched missiles? and then hit any news coverege sites.
Wonder what retaliation would occur....
You just might be right...
Which is nice for a change, usually it's all "leftist" leaning. Guess you know how every other day on Slashdot tends to feel for the rest of us. ;-)
Oh yeah, forgot to mention that the Israelis actually "bought" much of their land from the prior Arab owners.
The issue is, to extreme Islamicists, once land is Muslim it can never be allowed to become un-muslim.