I believe that has to do with the route. If there was more rail, then it should be much faster than travel by car. Cars stop for trains, not the other way around.
Will my old.odf files be updated, then? I often worry about not being able to properly open my old writings and such. I'd hate to have to manually re-save everything.
I know, right? I've always thought of Wal-Mart as being green because people had to drive fewer places to get things. But holy hell, that's a lot of power consumption.
I'm sure $1,000 was set just to house cost/generic baseline. Obviously, there will be lots of variables. Cost of products, labor, land, taxes. I just like house the house can be infinitely expandable, building larger pinwheels around the outside until it becomes insanely difficult to reach the center.
No, I don't believe there is any longer a single valid argument for "intellectual property" laws, of any kind. Not trademark, not copyright, and certainly not patents.
That solution is decidedly radical. Doesn't the best answer generally lie somewhere in the middle? If I find a single valid argument for intellectual property, then I have proved your solution/argument illogical.
I'd love to see THIS law put to a direct vote. Of course it won't be, and Bloomberg will probably get booted out next opportunity, but the cameras would of course still stay.
Slashdot Mirror
At least the fruit bats won't starve if we kill all the mosquitoes.
I believe that has to do with the route. If there was more rail, then it should be much faster than travel by car. Cars stop for trains, not the other way around.
And now I have to go wash my hands.
Will my old .odf files be updated, then? I often worry about not being able to properly open my old writings and such. I'd hate to have to manually re-save everything.
I know, right? I've always thought of Wal-Mart as being green because people had to drive fewer places to get things. But holy hell, that's a lot of power consumption.
I'm sure $1,000 was set just to house cost/generic baseline. Obviously, there will be lots of variables. Cost of products, labor, land, taxes. I just like house the house can be infinitely expandable, building larger pinwheels around the outside until it becomes insanely difficult to reach the center.
No, I don't believe there is any longer a single valid argument for "intellectual property" laws, of any kind. Not trademark, not copyright, and certainly not patents.
That solution is decidedly radical. Doesn't the best answer generally lie somewhere in the middle? If I find a single valid argument for intellectual property, then I have proved your solution/argument illogical.
...to books. Thank You
I'd love to see THIS law put to a direct vote. Of course it won't be, and Bloomberg will probably get booted out next opportunity, but the cameras would of course still stay.
Why doesn't he just hire Judge Dredd?
If its your time to go, its your time to go, there is nothing you can do to stop it.
Go where?
They can't have my genes. I'm wearing them! O wait... guess I'm not a candidate, anyways.