... how is not acting quantitatively different than an outright no-vote? the only thing that bitching about them not acting rather than voting no could be about, is because they're not hanging themselves.
their advice could be interpreted as, "this isn't the fucking time, it's the next guys problem, so we suggest you put this in a drawer."
you don't get to choose how or what their "advice" is. as people have linked to, they are perfectly constitutionally justified in refusing to hold a hearing.
:) it's the same as when Scotland wanted to succeed from the UK. I thought they'd be shooting themselves in the foot, and i was hella worried about my scotch... but a big part of me wanted to see them do it, just to see what would happen.
or what was going to happen to greece, if they left the EU.
as michael caine said, some people just want to see the world burn.
trump would most likely be a huge mistake... but you know what? it'd be amusing to watch. I mean, the president is not a king. But what deliciously insane things could he do before he stopped being president?
and it wasn't going to be "trump or hillary" voting, it would have been "trump/local voting or stay home" I mean, did i really want to spend 2+ hours on a meaningless vote just for kicks? now i'm going to spend 2+ hours out of spite.
i wasn't an angry outsider that supported him. I was toying with the idea of voting for him because I'm curious as to where it would lead. Interesting times and all, but now... I'm almost definitely going to vote for him because of them.
they weren't just attacking trump, they were attacking my rights too.
i think the test should be, 'would you still be out there a week from now after the rally closed?' just because it's a public space, doesn't mean that you're free to do whatever the hell you want with it. Presumably, they got a permit from the local government. as you're at you're leisure to do too. And it's still as public as I would want it, because if I or you, or anyone else wanted to, they could get a permit too. But that public space became their public space for 4 hours, because they asked the representative of the public collective real nice for the right to use it for that particular 4 hours.
fuck them. I was considering voting for trump because it wouldn't mean much, and i kinda just want to see what happens if he wins. Now i'm definitely going to vote for him because fuck them.
they just made this election about the nature of our democracy for me.
holy shit. paraphrasing hitchens 'who the fuck do they think they are? to decide for me who and what i can hear?'
my interpretation is that at least some of the things he purchased were downgrades. he buys them, hopefully to support the developer, and because he likes the historical aspects of the game.
let me ask you, if they released a skin that changed the knife to a dildo, would you buy it? for 5 dollars, 10 dollars? do you know someone who would?
he's playing against it like it's a human opponent, he's playing against it like he's a go champion, he needs to play against it like he's a programmer. I would be curious as to how it deals with mirror play, or wildly suboptimal plays. I would wonder if it's overfit to go played well.
nah, everybody has a book bag, phones, watches electronics go into your book bag. if i see a phone out and you haven't turned in your test yet, you lose all the points.
... people tend to get a bit touchy, when you know, 60 million people die over the course of 6 years. that tends to stick in people's minds.
i think it's a bit premature to talk about "letting it go" until we've run out of a concentration camp survivors, war veterans, and those touched by nuclear fire.
forgetting will happen as we lose them, and we'll be the poorer for it. Let it happen in its own time, to think of hastening it, would be doing them and theirs a great disservice.
... i'm not really overwhelmingly concerned with inconveniencing the guilty. Is changing your name any more or less an impediment than an old-timey "getting the fuck outta dodge"?
the better solution is this would be an adequate compromise between those that think people deserve the "convenient consequence of being forgotten predicated on humans having shitty memories", versus those that think "the right to be forgotten" is governmental overreach. We'll get to that when we get to that, but i've yet to be convinced that the government dictating to corporations what information they can and cannot share about something the government itself is mandated to disseminate is in any way correct.
just because it's how it was doesn't mean it's how it should be. the right to be forgotten was only a right because of imperfect technology. one could similarly lament the loss of the "freedom of entry" that we enjoyed prior to the invention of the lock.
Slashdot Mirror
because he's fine, but he's not who anyone actually wants.
... how is not acting quantitatively different than an outright no-vote? the only thing that bitching about them not acting rather than voting no could be about, is because they're not hanging themselves.
nah, their advice is "this isn't the time"
no, because they'd probably piss off their own constituents if it were a new presidency and they refused to hear a reasonably centrist candidate.
i'd say, now isn't the time... simply because i don't particularly like the look of a wildly activist court.
i like my courts slow, and conservative.
strictly speaking.
their advice could be interpreted as, "this isn't the fucking time, it's the next guys problem, so we suggest you put this in a drawer."
you don't get to choose how or what their "advice" is. as people have linked to, they are perfectly constitutionally justified in refusing to hold a hearing.
yeah, before we give the franchise to minors, how about giving the franchise to DC residents?
:) it's the same as when Scotland wanted to succeed from the UK. I thought they'd be shooting themselves in the foot, and i was hella worried about my scotch... but a big part of me wanted to see them do it, just to see what would happen.
or what was going to happen to greece, if they left the EU.
as michael caine said, some people just want to see the world burn.
trump would most likely be a huge mistake... but you know what? it'd be amusing to watch. I mean, the president is not a king. But what deliciously insane things could he do before he stopped being president?
and it wasn't going to be "trump or hillary" voting, it would have been "trump/local voting or stay home" I mean, did i really want to spend 2+ hours on a meaningless vote just for kicks? now i'm going to spend 2+ hours out of spite.
really? grant?... really?
i wasn't an angry outsider that supported him. I was toying with the idea of voting for him because I'm curious as to where it would lead. Interesting times and all, but now... I'm almost definitely going to vote for him because of them.
they weren't just attacking trump, they were attacking my rights too.
i think the test should be, 'would you still be out there a week from now after the rally closed?' just because it's a public space, doesn't mean that you're free to do whatever the hell you want with it. Presumably, they got a permit from the local government. as you're at you're leisure to do too. And it's still as public as I would want it, because if I or you, or anyone else wanted to, they could get a permit too. But that public space became their public space for 4 hours, because they asked the representative of the public collective real nice for the right to use it for that particular 4 hours.
fuck them. I was considering voting for trump because it wouldn't mean much, and i kinda just want to see what happens if he wins. Now i'm definitely going to vote for him because fuck them.
they just made this election about the nature of our democracy for me.
holy shit. paraphrasing hitchens 'who the fuck do they think they are? to decide for me who and what i can hear?'
fuck them.
:) not valve's job to keep a minor from spending money.
parental oversight and all that.
my interpretation is that at least some of the things he purchased were downgrades. he buys them, hopefully to support the developer, and because he likes the historical aspects of the game.
let me ask you, if they released a skin that changed the knife to a dildo, would you buy it? for 5 dollars, 10 dollars? do you know someone who would?
the thing though is, it's not a brute force machine, it's a neural network with heuristics.
take it somewhere you and it have never played before, and it will have 0 "creativity"
tired is a strong word to use.
he's playing against it like it's a human opponent, he's playing against it like he's a go champion, he needs to play against it like he's a programmer. I would be curious as to how it deals with mirror play, or wildly suboptimal plays. I would wonder if it's overfit to go played well.
nah, everybody has a book bag, phones, watches electronics go into your book bag. if i see a phone out and you haven't turned in your test yet, you lose all the points.
yeah, convict a 14 year old.
god, i think you've just broke the back of this.
google can't program for assholes.
... people tend to get a bit touchy, when you know, 60 million people die over the course of 6 years. that tends to stick in people's minds.
i think it's a bit premature to talk about "letting it go" until we've run out of a concentration camp survivors, war veterans, and those touched by nuclear fire.
forgetting will happen as we lose them, and we'll be the poorer for it. Let it happen in its own time, to think of hastening it, would be doing them and theirs a great disservice.
oh god, i just imagined a new pastime.
running by people unloading luggage at a train station or airport out of the trunk of a self-driving car, and yelling really load, "DRIVE HOME"
or poking the "drive home" button with a stick, i don't know.
oh yeah, the complaint about self driving cruise missiles.
you should read your link a bit more carefully
"If roughly 80 percent of our population is urban, roughly 80 percent of our urban areas are actually small towns."
urbanized area is 50,000. there's only a handful of actual cities in the US one can live as a pedestrian comfortably.
yeah, people keeping bringing up that "back in the day" one could just get out of dodge, and *magic* clean slate.
in which case, you're treating a symptom. what you should be doing is asking why the drunk guy is lumped in with sex offenders.
... i'm not really overwhelmingly concerned with inconveniencing the guilty. Is changing your name any more or less an impediment than an old-timey "getting the fuck outta dodge"?
the better solution is this would be an adequate compromise between those that think people deserve the "convenient consequence of being forgotten predicated on humans having shitty memories", versus those that think "the right to be forgotten" is governmental overreach. We'll get to that when we get to that, but i've yet to be convinced that the government dictating to corporations what information they can and cannot share about something the government itself is mandated to disseminate is in any way correct.
just because it's how it was doesn't mean it's how it should be. the right to be forgotten was only a right because of imperfect technology. one could similarly lament the loss of the "freedom of entry" that we enjoyed prior to the invention of the lock.