The biggest similarity between the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and climate alarmists is that they both have predicted the end of the world like a dozen times by now.
We don't use TCP because it's particularly efficient, but because it has been the standard for decades. With our current knowledge, humans could also design faster protocols, we just don't want to waste our time, seeing that not even IPv6 has managed to become adopted.
While I love Eclipse, that's actually one of its problems. They are releasing new versions too fast, which causes lots of stability and compatibility problems. One stable release doesn't make up for the unstable buggy ones before it. Ganymede was already rock solid, they should've taken their time and focus on not screwing that up.
No, he said that we should stop forms of research that cost a lot and produces no gains in economy, well-being or knowledge. While collecting random data can sometimes prove to be useful, concentrated research is far more efficient.
Anoxia was never a possibility. The majority of fossil reserves is unexploitable. Even if we cut down all forests and burned everything we found, there's way too much oxygen in the air for it to make a difference.
The UDHR is overly generic, contradictory and tries to regulate way too many things. The reason it doesn't get respected because it's impossible to live up to it, or even interpret it. It should be rewritten from scratch, containing only the basic natural rights, specified in a concrete, objective and consistent way.
Theoretically, CS should be math, CE should be programming and EE should be hardware, but there's plenty of overlap. Most companies around here will hire either for either position.
They are safer than if nothing had happened. An earthquake is far too powerful to be caused by geothermal or fracking. What happens is that the tension that was already there gets released. And it's better if it gets released before it can build up to a big quake.
Now, this signals that PCs have been universally adopted. Now that everybody has one, the sales will obviously decline. But this only means that the growth period of PCs is over, and that personal computing has reached maturity.
Greenland is only harsh for humans. Curiously, it's easier to build a rover for a Martian or an arctic weather than to build one that can withstand rain, mud, vegetation etc.
Slashdot Mirror
The biggest similarity between the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and climate alarmists is that they both have predicted the end of the world like a dozen times by now.
We don't use TCP because it's particularly efficient, but because it has been the standard for decades. With our current knowledge, humans could also design faster protocols, we just don't want to waste our time, seeing that not even IPv6 has managed to become adopted.
That's when those legally owned AA turrets will actually be useful.
That would only work if Knife was an object, not an int.
While I love Eclipse, that's actually one of its problems. They are releasing new versions too fast, which causes lots of stability and compatibility problems. One stable release doesn't make up for the unstable buggy ones before it. Ganymede was already rock solid, they should've taken their time and focus on not screwing that up.
Unlike a representative, a robot can be trusted to fulfill its program.
No, he said that we should stop forms of research that cost a lot and produces no gains in economy, well-being or knowledge. While collecting random data can sometimes prove to be useful, concentrated research is far more efficient.
Anoxia was never a possibility. The majority of fossil reserves is unexploitable. Even if we cut down all forests and burned everything we found, there's way too much oxygen in the air for it to make a difference.
when you lock your women in the basement.
Instead of interplanetary travel, how about using these thrusters to deorbit the cubesats at their end of life so they don't become spacejunk?
When legal hackers get prosecuted it's no wonder they flock to the black markets.
No, it wasn't. Whether you get hacked or not is entirely up to you. Why would I care if other people using unsecure systems get hacked?
The UDHR is overly generic, contradictory and tries to regulate way too many things. The reason it doesn't get respected because it's impossible to live up to it, or even interpret it. It should be rewritten from scratch, containing only the basic natural rights, specified in a concrete, objective and consistent way.
Theoretically, CS should be math, CE should be programming and EE should be hardware, but there's plenty of overlap. Most companies around here will hire either for either position.
They are safer than if nothing had happened. An earthquake is far too powerful to be caused by geothermal or fracking. What happens is that the tension that was already there gets released. And it's better if it gets released before it can build up to a big quake.
All these skills and he still didn't figure out how to turn off capslock.
Now, this signals that PCs have been universally adopted. Now that everybody has one, the sales will obviously decline. But this only means that the growth period of PCs is over, and that personal computing has reached maturity.
Bringing back material from Mars's moons may be an easier first step.
I don't care how practical it is, I could watch this thing all day long.
More than you think. It already managed to get dangerous military technology into almost every household.
Sadly, this behaviour is not limited to America. Some people just get crazy once inside a car.
Disclosing these vulnerabilities would do much more against the Chinese hackers than hacking back does. Sometimes the best defence is defence.
Greenland is only harsh for humans. Curiously, it's easier to build a rover for a Martian or an arctic weather than to build one that can withstand rain, mud, vegetation etc.
The indie scene is already fixing the industry. The big guys can adapt or die.
How do you know that?