That is the point. Solar panels are designed for constant electricity generation, not to provide emergency power. In a storm, the panels that don't get swept from the roof by the winds won't generate any electricity because there's no sun.
Re:Uh...it's still there, you know
on
The Web We Lost
·
· Score: 1
Exactly, if the noobs leave the web it's better for both of us, I don't see a problem here.
The problem with disabled rights is that they are not a natural right, but requires massive governmental spending. That doesn't mean that countries are banned from implementing it, only that they aren't forced to do so. Some countries are simply not in the economic position to be able to afford that, and forcing them to spend all their money on medicare instead of trying to get out of poverty is unfair. And the current treaty isn't really an international agreement, because many countries oppose it, not only America. And if you think that leaving American control will somehow free the internet, you are very naive. The ITU will still be controlled by politicians, the difference is that most of them will be unelected.
I haven't seen one that had any value, they are just a way of using shiny pics to spread ignorance while appearing smart because they have numbers on 'em.
Deciding what counts as obvious is very subjective, while deciding what counts as a software/mathematical patent can be done objectively, and will cover most of the obvious cases.
You can't protect against the owners not recording themselves. After all, if they really don't want to appear on tape they won't put up cameras in the first place. Realistically, the footage can't be used against its owner. Prerecorded fakes are a bigger problem, but they are also much harder to do for a number of reasons. First, they require lots of preparation, so they wouldn't work in cases where the crime wasn't, or wasn't properly planned. Second, there are a huge number of unpredictable events, which you can't fake. For example, if a camera is between two other cameras, both of which recorded a person or car passing by, its absence in the footage of the middle one will be a sign of forgery.
Faking A/V gets easier and easier. The only way I see to be able to use CCTV records as proof is to upload them to a trusted organisation at real time. The feed should be encrypted, but everytime a court wants to use it as proof they can ask for the recording from the organisation and the key from the owner, and can be sure that the result has not been tampered with.
The point of cloud storage is that you don't have to care about the physical location of data. Cloud providers will just withdraw their storage servers from countries that tax them.
I don't see paying for the renting of a facility as corruption. It's good business for both of them. Kazakhstan doesn't have a space program so the Baikonur would be useless to them, and Russia doesn't have territories near the equator, so they have to strike a deal.
Countries paying an undefined compensation in proportion of their wealth won't solve anything. If we want to incentivize emission cuts, we should require countries to pay up (or receive aid) in proportion of their emissions. That's what the old emission credit system did, and while it wasn't perfect it was still much better than the current treaty. But that wasn't good for the radical greens, now look at what we've got as a result.
According to the paper, most people trust their personal experience of the local weather. Sadly, this is one case where common sense like that doesn't really work.
Slashdot Mirror
The best check is the site of an actual seismologist. Tweets shouldn't be trusted in emergency scenarios.
That is the point. Solar panels are designed for constant electricity generation, not to provide emergency power. In a storm, the panels that don't get swept from the roof by the winds won't generate any electricity because there's no sun.
Exactly, if the noobs leave the web it's better for both of us, I don't see a problem here.
The problem with disabled rights is that they are not a natural right, but requires massive governmental spending. That doesn't mean that countries are banned from implementing it, only that they aren't forced to do so. Some countries are simply not in the economic position to be able to afford that, and forcing them to spend all their money on medicare instead of trying to get out of poverty is unfair.
And the current treaty isn't really an international agreement, because many countries oppose it, not only America. And if you think that leaving American control will somehow free the internet, you are very naive. The ITU will still be controlled by politicians, the difference is that most of them will be unelected.
I haven't seen one that had any value, they are just a way of using shiny pics to spread ignorance while appearing smart because they have numbers on 'em.
It may be just a rumor but I heard that his son was kidnapped once, so I'm not sure he is as secure as he likes to believe.
the twelfth of January!
He is definitely guilty of running from justice.
But the old shuttles most certainly do. Assuming they can get one out of the museum and battle-ready in time, they could go up and capture it.
Deciding what counts as obvious is very subjective, while deciding what counts as a software/mathematical patent can be done objectively, and will cover most of the obvious cases.
Theoretically, all CRTs can be used to display vector graphics.
For sanctions to work, everybody would need to respect them. North Korea got this far with the help of China.
Having a tyranny doesn't mean stability when the tyrant himself is unstable. North Korea is using nuclear threats as a regular tool in diplomacy.
You can't protect against the owners not recording themselves. After all, if they really don't want to appear on tape they won't put up cameras in the first place. Realistically, the footage can't be used against its owner.
Prerecorded fakes are a bigger problem, but they are also much harder to do for a number of reasons. First, they require lots of preparation, so they wouldn't work in cases where the crime wasn't, or wasn't properly planned. Second, there are a huge number of unpredictable events, which you can't fake. For example, if a camera is between two other cameras, both of which recorded a person or car passing by, its absence in the footage of the middle one will be a sign of forgery.
Faking A/V gets easier and easier. The only way I see to be able to use CCTV records as proof is to upload them to a trusted organisation at real time. The feed should be encrypted, but everytime a court wants to use it as proof they can ask for the recording from the organisation and the key from the owner, and can be sure that the result has not been tampered with.
This. Free speech only occurs between consenting parties.
The point of cloud storage is that you don't have to care about the physical location of data. Cloud providers will just withdraw their storage servers from countries that tax them.
The only thing that protects them from the US army is China.
is almost certainly bullshit.
The EPO already allows some software patents. The only difference is that now they can do it legally.
I don't see paying for the renting of a facility as corruption. It's good business for both of them. Kazakhstan doesn't have a space program so the Baikonur would be useless to them, and Russia doesn't have territories near the equator, so they have to strike a deal.
Countries paying an undefined compensation in proportion of their wealth won't solve anything. If we want to incentivize emission cuts, we should require countries to pay up (or receive aid) in proportion of their emissions. That's what the old emission credit system did, and while it wasn't perfect it was still much better than the current treaty. But that wasn't good for the radical greens, now look at what we've got as a result.
But 4chan promised them they will al be anonymous and nobody can find them!
According to the paper, most people trust their personal experience of the local weather. Sadly, this is one case where common sense like that doesn't really work.
Speed is another reason why current exception handling mechanisms are insufficient.