The issue here, is that people are not interested in true, long range, sustainable projects, they want to fix everything with nukes. At this point it may seem wiser to just let it roll and nature do its job, either, we all die (humans) and Earth heal by itself, or 90% of humans die, and the rest learns to play nice with the ecosystem (untill they fuck up again).
Was he really "poorer"? He may have died with less virtually inflated currency compared with the others you mentioned, but sure as hell he had more adquisitive power than any of them, included Gates (Buffet may had more but you didnt included him in the list).
Tell me the name of another company, that was almost 100% in control of the CEO, that had those volumes of market in the US/EU and ASIA.
Also, he didnt just got Rich overnight because the success of one company, he made the right choices almost every time, with different companies and projects, almost as if He knew what was gonna happen, thats kind of hard to emulate (unless you have a time machine).
Slashdot Mirror
They will get more from mining uranus than what they will get from these other endeavors.
Does it, really? ... I'm pretty sure they getting their compensation somewhere else, like selling your data.
If you go to college just for the diploma, you are doing it wrong.
Next time you will tell me I can be an olympic athlete without training.
Or you could just destabilize the magnetic field and pluck it like a flower bud. Non-enginner folks just dont understand what we talking about here.
Clean the atmosphere while fucking the ocean.
The issue here, is that people are not interested in true, long range, sustainable projects, they want to fix everything with nukes. At this point it may seem wiser to just let it roll and nature do its job, either, we all die (humans) and Earth heal by itself, or 90% of humans die, and the rest learns to play nice with the ecosystem (untill they fuck up again).
Was he really "poorer"? He may have died with less virtually inflated currency compared with the others you mentioned, but sure as hell he had more adquisitive power than any of them, included Gates (Buffet may had more but you didnt included him in the list).
Tell me the name of another company, that was almost 100% in control of the CEO, that had those volumes of market in the US/EU and ASIA.
Also, he didnt just got Rich overnight because the success of one company, he made the right choices almost every time, with different companies and projects, almost as if He knew what was gonna happen, thats kind of hard to emulate (unless you have a time machine).
But if I had a time machine, I wouldnt think it twice and just take his spot in history.
Hey may not had the skills of a Torvald or an Stallman, but boy HE knew where to put his money.
Any chance you write for Fox news? I'm sure 0.7% of 75~80% of the pc market is bigger than 1% of 7~15%.
Not talking about the lawsuits, but the blocking. Samsung set the bar.