Verbally abusing someone indicates a lack of verbal skills in the sense that the abuser can't express yourself properly.
You're implying two things here: 1. The person who verbally abuses does so because they can't express themself in another way (this is false), and 2. Verbal abuse isn't "proper" - define "proper".
The hate against GNOME 3 has mixed origins. Some are natural, as "they changed now it sucks" reactions; the fact GNOME 2 was/is great also doesn't help at all. Some are because the software is new and nowhere mature. But some are genuine complaints from the users for GNOME 3 not actually improving their experience, but getting in the way to do common tasks - the devs confused "simple" with "simplistic" and are completely deaf for users' requests (some as simple as putting back in 3.7 a background configuration already present in 3.6.
As for me, I just moved to MATE when the whole thing happened and I'm quite happy with it.
I disagree, since I've seen more often larger countries breaking into smaller ones (Yugoslavia, South Sudan, etc.) than countries merging, thus seeing an Araucárias Federation of sorts or even three Republics spawning from former South wouldn't be improbable. Also, economic blocs aren't replacing the countries, but making countries matter less and less.
But my point is more along those lines: worst hypothesis, if shit hits the fan that bad, we still have this possibility, and enough political power to do so. But what about the others? Specially, what about the North, the often forgotten region, in some aspects more in need than Northeast?
Yet another case of a government Missing. The. Point.
Latin American governments more often than not miss completely the point. And this goes beyond the old right vs. center vs. left discussion - it's about competence.
** One last thing: be careful with brazilian newspapers. Most of them will stand for its own agenda and they are part of the problem, not the solution.
Agreed. AND TVS, SPECIALLY GLOBO. That... thing manages to distort news even worse than newspapers.
Piá, at least us Southerners have some [small] hope with the possibility of independence (although O Sul é meu País is lazy as fuck), but what worries me most are the others...
Actually, PT is centrist - the name only means that it has roots in "trabalhismo" (labour movement).
I'll just mention that a right-wing or a left-wing party in this circumstance would have the same kind of trouble, as long as it was so incompetent and dishonest as PT (PSDB, center-right, I'm looking at you).
This is a common phenomenon among former colonial languages - the metropolis has far more population and connections for far more time, the language evolves faster there. American/Canadian English, Quebecois French, Latin American Spanish, South American Portuguese, most varieties of those are more conservative than the languages spoken in England, France, Spain and Portugal.
"Dark matter" is actually just a way to say "we know there's something here, but we have no clue of what it is". I think that anti-matter alone won't explain everything called "dark", but it could be a major component.
If and only if F=-1 (anti-matter and matter repel each other gravitationally), the following questions have already satisfactory answers, at least for me:
* Why is our universe composed of matter only? It isn't. There are both normal matter [NM] and anti-matter [AM]. But since they repel each other and attract their own kinds, they gang into NM-only and AM-only "clusters".
* What's a galaxy? Why are they formed?" Each galaxy is one of those clusters. They're formed in "separated blobs" instead of a single huge one due to the repulsion.
* "Why is the universe's expansion accelerating?" AM-NM repulsion.
* "Where is the anti-matter?" We probably already saw, named and cataloged anti-matter galaxies, since they interact with the light (what we have coming from them) in the same way as normal matter. (...mmmm. What if we checked for possible intergalactic repulsion? This would corroborate with the "F=-1" hypothesis, although a negative wouldn't rule out the hypothesis, i.e. it's not falsifiable.)
* "Are there anti-matter intelligent beings in the space, ready to throw mankind into slavery for their ugly purposes?" Only if they want us to do information-related jobs, since they would be annihilated by any goods we do. I, for one, welcome our new anti-matter overlords.
...when you remember March 14th is also Einstein's anniversary. Of course, the anniversary of a Mathematician would be better suited, but maybe a physicist is already good enough?
I find a flamewar for this reason improbable, since Xfce doesn't polarize the discussion in "haters vs. lovers" as much as GNOME. And I can be wrong, but I don't think somebody will revert this, so count "they" as "one person doing and the others agreeing, by genuine agreement or plain omission".
GNOME always had a huge load of dependencies, and this is only getting worse as time goes by. Yes, this includes 2.x, but most of us wouldn't bother because it was popular - most would simply keep it, some would install something else, and few would have the trouble of uninstalling it.
However, since lots of people hate GNOME 3, the odds of people needing to remove all its packages rise sharply: "I DON'T WANT THAT UGLY BLOAT IN MY SYSTEM!" isn't something unheard... keeping GNOME 3.x as default DE would be counter-productive both to Debian's loyal fanbase (giving them more work) and to new users (since most potential users are turned off by retarded defaults in any distro).
Yes, there is net-inst. No, you don't need to install even the default desktop. But people, when getting in touch with a distro, will first and foremost go by the easier way - using the defaults. So, while they probably weren't lying that Debian+GNOME isn't fitting a CD anymore, it's probably the least concern that made them drop it as default.
Depends on the tea, but most of them have less caffeine than coffee. Drink mate, on the other hand, and you won't sleep for two days. Except if you're used to it.
First of all, why seems everybody forgets about the metallic bonds?
Covalent: that old, nice and sharing couple;
Ionic: same as above, but one of them is abusive and electron digger;
Metallic bond: communism of electrons (or orgy, if you prefer).You know, covalent and ionic aFirst: covalent and ionic aren't two "types" of bonds but extremes of the same continuum. Some bonds - like in hydrogen fluoride - lie pretty much between them, not being fully ionic or fully covalent.
Second thing: ironically, there is no such thing as "types" of bonds. These three categories above aren't "unmixable", you have "metallic" bonds with covalent properties (like gold loves to make), you have borderline covalent-ionic bonds (like HF), this kind of thing. Think in them as extremes in a triangle, while most real life bonds lie inside this triangle.
Lastly, about the article itself... seems like "quantum computing" is what they put when they cannot think in an application to a Chem or Phys discovery nowadays. And I understood they didn't found a new bond type or whatever; their discovery was "oh look, orbitals can be deformed by magnetic fields!".
Just my two cents of opinion on answering your "why": I think they'll break some C-C bonds and put hydroxyl radicals (OH) in their places. In order for the water to pass, it just needs to lend one hydrogen to the hydroxyl (even if at the other side of the membrane) and takes its place, this is far quicker than hitting the right position of the hole to pass.
Of course, where there was a C-C bond, it'll be a hole, so some salt can pass too (especially because sodium ions are pretty small), but not enough to make the process useless.
(Note, this is just a guessing. Take my words with a grain of salt... from RO or not.)
Slashdot Mirror
Verbally abusing someone indicates a lack of verbal skills in the sense that the abuser can't express yourself properly.
You're implying two things here:
1. The person who verbally abuses does so because they can't express themself in another way (this is false), and
2. Verbal abuse isn't "proper" - define "proper".
I guess he does enjoy being a dick, but he doesn't associate his bad temper with being Linux's creator, this can be easily checked in his first answer, here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137392506516022&w=2
Torvalds was always like that and whining won't change him.
The hate against GNOME 3 has mixed origins. Some are natural, as "they changed now it sucks" reactions; the fact GNOME 2 was/is great also doesn't help at all. Some are because the software is new and nowhere mature. But some are genuine complaints from the users for GNOME 3 not actually improving their experience, but getting in the way to do common tasks - the devs confused "simple" with "simplistic" and are completely deaf for users' requests (some as simple as putting back in 3.7 a background configuration already present in 3.6.
As for me, I just moved to MATE when the whole thing happened and I'm quite happy with it.
I disagree, since I've seen more often larger countries breaking into smaller ones (Yugoslavia, South Sudan, etc.) than countries merging, thus seeing an Araucárias Federation of sorts or even three Republics spawning from former South wouldn't be improbable. Also, economic blocs aren't replacing the countries, but making countries matter less and less.
But my point is more along those lines: worst hypothesis, if shit hits the fan that bad, we still have this possibility, and enough political power to do so. But what about the others? Specially, what about the North, the often forgotten region, in some aspects more in need than Northeast?
I guess he means that people see Alckmin as a "religious" solution for the problems.
(At least, from what I see, only for Paulistas.)
Yet another case of a government Missing. The. Point.
Latin American governments more often than not miss completely the point. And this goes beyond the old right vs. center vs. left discussion - it's about competence.
** One last thing: be careful with brazilian newspapers. Most of them will stand for its own agenda and they are part of the problem, not the solution.
Agreed. AND TVS, SPECIALLY GLOBO. That... thing manages to distort news even worse than newspapers.
Piá, at least us Southerners have some [small] hope with the possibility of independence (although O Sul é meu País is lazy as fuck), but what worries me most are the others...
Actually, PT is centrist - the name only means that it has roots in "trabalhismo" (labour movement).
I'll just mention that a right-wing or a left-wing party in this circumstance would have the same kind of trouble, as long as it was so incompetent and dishonest as PT (PSDB, center-right, I'm looking at you).
This is a common phenomenon among former colonial languages - the metropolis has far more population and connections for far more time, the language evolves faster there. American/Canadian English, Quebecois French, Latin American Spanish, South American Portuguese, most varieties of those are more conservative than the languages spoken in England, France, Spain and Portugal.
"Dark matter" is actually just a way to say "we know there's something here, but we have no clue of what it is". I think that anti-matter alone won't explain everything called "dark", but it could be a major component.
If and only if F=-1 (anti-matter and matter repel each other gravitationally), the following questions have already satisfactory answers, at least for me:
* Why is our universe composed of matter only?
It isn't. There are both normal matter [NM] and anti-matter [AM]. But since they repel each other and attract their own kinds, they gang into NM-only and AM-only "clusters".
* What's a galaxy? Why are they formed?"
Each galaxy is one of those clusters. They're formed in "separated blobs" instead of a single huge one due to the repulsion.
* "Why is the universe's expansion accelerating?"
AM-NM repulsion.
* "Where is the anti-matter?"
We probably already saw, named and cataloged anti-matter galaxies, since they interact with the light (what we have coming from them) in the same way as normal matter. (...mmmm. What if we checked for possible intergalactic repulsion? This would corroborate with the "F=-1" hypothesis, although a negative wouldn't rule out the hypothesis, i.e. it's not falsifiable.)
* "Are there anti-matter intelligent beings in the space, ready to throw mankind into slavery for their ugly purposes?"
Only if they want us to do information-related jobs, since they would be annihilated by any goods we do.
I, for one, welcome our new anti-matter overlords.
...when you remember March 14th is also Einstein's anniversary. Of course, the anniversary of a Mathematician would be better suited, but maybe a physicist is already good enough?
...will somebody sue me for patent violation due to previous art in "first", "second" and "third"?
I find a flamewar for this reason improbable, since Xfce doesn't polarize the discussion in "haters vs. lovers" as much as GNOME. And I can be wrong, but I don't think somebody will revert this, so count "they" as "one person doing and the others agreeing, by genuine agreement or plain omission".
GNOME always had a huge load of dependencies, and this is only getting worse as time goes by. Yes, this includes 2.x, but most of us wouldn't bother because it was popular - most would simply keep it, some would install something else, and few would have the trouble of uninstalling it.
However, since lots of people hate GNOME 3, the odds of people needing to remove all its packages rise sharply: "I DON'T WANT THAT UGLY BLOAT IN MY SYSTEM!" isn't something unheard... keeping GNOME 3.x as default DE would be counter-productive both to Debian's loyal fanbase (giving them more work) and to new users (since most potential users are turned off by retarded defaults in any distro).
Yes, there is net-inst. No, you don't need to install even the default desktop. But people, when getting in touch with a distro, will first and foremost go by the easier way - using the defaults. So, while they probably weren't lying that Debian+GNOME isn't fitting a CD anymore, it's probably the least concern that made them drop it as default.
I'm sure they'll complete their own kernel the year thereafter.
I think GNOME OS will be ready to use Hurd as a kernel, so both will be launched at the same time. Right? Right???
I like the analogy.
When heated, moves forward, backward, at amazing speeds, but never actually going anywhere.
Depends on the tea, but most of them have less caffeine than coffee. Drink mate, on the other hand, and you won't sleep for two days. Except if you're used to it.
Well, it's barely better than the ASCII Art, but feel free to use this if you want: http://i.imgur.com/U8fjM.png
Also, I like the fact you're trying to address the bag of spilling (package managers) without adding more spill (yet another package manager).
I've tested your alpha - it's unpolished but it works. I wish the best luck.
First of all, why seems everybody forgets about the metallic bonds?
Covalent: that old, nice and sharing couple;
Ionic: same as above, but one of them is abusive and electron digger;
Metallic bond: communism of electrons (or orgy, if you prefer).You know, covalent and ionic aFirst: covalent and ionic aren't two "types" of bonds but extremes of the same continuum. Some bonds - like in hydrogen fluoride - lie pretty much between them, not being fully ionic or fully covalent.
Second thing: ironically, there is no such thing as "types" of bonds. These three categories above aren't "unmixable", you have "metallic" bonds with covalent properties (like gold loves to make), you have borderline covalent-ionic bonds (like HF), this kind of thing. Think in them as extremes in a triangle, while most real life bonds lie inside this triangle.
Lastly, about the article itself... seems like "quantum computing" is what they put when they cannot think in an application to a Chem or Phys discovery nowadays. And I understood they didn't found a new bond type or whatever; their discovery was "oh look, orbitals can be deformed by magnetic fields!".
Minetest? Why, if "normal" Minecraft runs fine and native?
One more benefit of caffeine: it drives you away from hazards like fresh air and sun!
Just my two cents of opinion on answering your "why": I think they'll break some C-C bonds and put hydroxyl radicals (OH) in their places. In order for the water to pass, it just needs to lend one hydrogen to the hydroxyl (even if at the other side of the membrane) and takes its place, this is far quicker than hitting the right position of the hole to pass.
Of course, where there was a C-C bond, it'll be a hole, so some salt can pass too (especially because sodium ions are pretty small), but not enough to make the process useless.
(Note, this is just a guessing. Take my words with a grain of salt... from RO or not.)
No, it's not the Brazilian government who's doing this, but Bolivian (using Brazilian tech). No sovereignty issues here.