God I love left wing projection, it must be nice being able to blame all of your problems on the other side without a moment of self reflection or awareness.
The usual right wing lies
A lie requires me to know that what I am saying is false... care to support that claim?
No? You lament a lack of facts from me (despite me highlighting just one law she can be convicted under)... but offer nothing yourself... this is my shocked face::|
no proof of course
If you bothered to pay attention to the available facts and use your brain (I'm sure you have one, it's just atrophied a bit from lack of use), allow me to educate you:
1) True or false: Hillary is known to have had at least one spy satellite photo on her server which should have been labeled "TOP SECRET//SI//TK//NOFORN", a image which did not originate with the State Department so the original classification would apply.
2) True or false: Hillary's private email server was authorized by the State Department or another federal agency to store classified information.
3) True or false: Hillary is known to have been briefed on her requirements to properly handle classified information and signed a document confirming her acceptance of policies, including criminal penalties for violations.
Given the law I cited above doesn't require 'malice' or 'intent', but simply 'gross negligence', it's not at all a stretch to suggest that Hillary was negligent with the setting up of her server that any reasonable person would expect would see classified information traverse it... and given the fact the server was not a 'proper place of custody'... per instance of classified information on her server, she could be looking at a penalty of "Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."
How much does being a Hillary shill pay? I'm looking for a side job, and unlike you morons, I actually have a grasp of facts.
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
How much does being an online pro-Clinton shill pay? Or is your ignorance actually real?
People keep saying that but I've not heard a single person quote a law she appears to be guilty of other than being a bitch.
Clearly you aren't paying attention, applicable laws have been cited by many, allow me to educate you. To start, look up 18 U.S. Code 793
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Given the emails she turned over contained satellite images which should have been labeled as "TOP SECRET//SI//TK//NOFORN", it's pretty clear that would be covered by the above section (as just one example).
You'll note in the statute above, there is no intent required, only gross negligence, which is a pretty easy bar to meet given her knowingly setting up a server that as SoS would receive classified information from time to time.
And this aside from the fact the IG says that she didn't turn over all of the emails she was supposed to, not only can she be hit under 793 for the emails being removed from their "proper place of custody", but also for the destruction of them as well, but also for destruction of the emails under FOIA laws.
she was technically in charge of state and could set whatever policy she wanted.
No, she can't. She could declassify anything originating from State, but anything coming from another agency she has no authority over.
And yet despite the release of all of Palin's emails, I don't recall a single one being redacted for containing classified information which had been unlawfully stored in an unapproved location.
Nice try at deflection, best try to find a more relevant example to try to excuse bad behavior with.
It has been reported that the FBI was able to recover the deleted emails... and presumably they recovered more than just the giant binary file which contained the email store, so a more in-depth look at if the server had ever been compromised is probably possible, but we aren't going to know for sure until the FBI talks a bit more publicly.
Microsoft are deeply ashamed of all the Windows that came before 10 and would prefer everyone forget they ever existed.
You assume that they are truly proud of what they have now. Windows 10 (especially on mobile) has been a cluster f. It shipped too early, unpolished and only barley tested (which isn't unexpected when you fire all of your testers the year before).
I kind of feel for them.
Pity them. Windows for desktops/laptops/devices is dying and they are desperate to make and/or keep it relevant.
The only money making that happens wrt Windows today and likely in the future is as the backend of Azure... which does sort of make you wonder given their push to CoreCLR (ie not Windows centric), at what point they fire most of the devs behind Windows, put the business into sustained engineering mode and ride the wave until it finally ends (ala Radio Shack).
especially given Microsoft's motivation to maintain at least a foothold in mobile.
What motivation?
For the last year or so it's been pretty clear that all they've been trying to do is keep the lights on in the phone side of things while biding their time.
The fact is that Windows 10 Mobile is a disaster. The devices which shipped with 8/8.1 and have been upgraded via the insider program are buggy as hell, and the few devices shipped with it built in have been even worse.
There seems to be a hope that a future 'Surface Phone' will save them, and if they completely shut down phone manufacturing/development, it would be a lot harder to re-spin up should they decide they've got something meaningful to sell.
If your state is concerned about citizen death, consider disarming the law-abiding ones.
The warzone that is Chicago agrees... shame the rest of us won't get onboard with restricting rights in other states so that illegal guns quit killing people on the south-side on their own.
The kind of moron who feels the need to purchase an untraceable weapon will pay a premium for some POS that can't be tied to him.
Someone who is unable to pass the required checks to purchase one legally?
There is a reason straw purchases exist.
Also, throw down guns. If you are a cop who has just shot someone who turns out to be unarmed, you may find it useful (though very illegal as well) to have a gun which has no paperwork connection to you that you can throw next to the body and claim the prep was going for it when you shot them,
A proper Russian made or officially licensed AK-47 which supports fully automatic firing? True... it'd take 9-12 months for your NFA paperwork to clear before you could take possession of the rifle.
You can however walk into oodles of gun stores and buy a knock off (AK-47 is probably the most patent infringed firearm in history) or maybe licensed version for a few hundred dollars.
Even in the US a gun registration can make a gun unsuitable or unattainable many crimes
Most states don't 'register' guns, and the feds are barred from doing so (other than NFA items).
Worst case, you make the mistake of buying something new from an FFL, use it in a crime & leave it behind. The PD/BATFE will contact the manufacturer to learn which distributor, then which FFL sold it, and a 'quick' search through mounds of paperwork will turn up who it was sold it and you are going to have a bad day.
A used gun sale at an FFL requires a bit of guessing as to which FFL sold it and when, but still can eventually turn up the last FFL sale (in the area).
No need even for the 'black market' though. In most states, private sales are legal to another person (who resides in the state and is legally able to acquire the firearm), and it doesn't take too much effort to find a seller in your state, meet them in a parking lot, show a drivers license to prove residency, hand over cash and, receive the gun and shake hands... this also is the same source that the many a 'throw down gun' has come from.
The lawyers who have lied in his courtroom have likely been barred from ever arguing before him again... one hopes a President Trump elevates a straight shooting judge like this and further limits the careers of those DoJ folks.
Everyone is talking disbarment and jail time
If you bothered to read TFA, you'd see the judge acknowledged he lacks the authority to disbar them. More so, jail risks (largely baseless) screams of "separation of powers!"
The DoJ is however on notice regarding this behavior, setting a fairly clear president of should they fail to act as they are required in this and court rooms of the other 26 plaintiff states.
Slashdot Mirror
God I love left wing projection, it must be nice being able to blame all of your problems on the other side without a moment of self reflection or awareness.
A lie requires me to know that what I am saying is false... care to support that claim?
No? You lament a lack of facts from me (despite me highlighting just one law she can be convicted under)... but offer nothing yourself... this is my shocked face: :|
If you bothered to pay attention to the available facts and use your brain (I'm sure you have one, it's just atrophied a bit from lack of use), allow me to educate you:
1) True or false: Hillary is known to have had at least one spy satellite photo on her server which should have been labeled "TOP SECRET//SI//TK//NOFORN", a image which did not originate with the State Department so the original classification would apply.
2) True or false: Hillary's private email server was authorized by the State Department or another federal agency to store classified information.
3) True or false: Hillary is known to have been briefed on her requirements to properly handle classified information and signed a document confirming her acceptance of policies, including criminal penalties for violations.
Answer Key:
1) True: http://www.thedailybeast.com/a...
2) False: https://www.washingtonpost.com...
3) True: http://freebeacon.com/politics...
Given the law I cited above doesn't require 'malice' or 'intent', but simply 'gross negligence', it's not at all a stretch to suggest that Hillary was negligent with the setting up of her server that any reasonable person would expect would see classified information traverse it... and given the fact the server was not a 'proper place of custody'... per instance of classified information on her server, she could be looking at a penalty of "Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."
How much does being a Hillary shill pay? I'm looking for a side job, and unlike you morons, I actually have a grasp of facts.
Seriously, how much does being a Clinton shill pay? I'm looking for a side gig.
Intent is not required, only gross negligence.
Damages are not required, simply allowing the classified info to end up in an unapproved place is.
Ever stop to read & consider just one of the relevant?
How much does being an online pro-Clinton shill pay? Or is your ignorance actually real?
Clearly you aren't paying attention, applicable laws have been cited by many, allow me to educate you. To start, look up 18 U.S. Code 793
Given the emails she turned over contained satellite images which should have been labeled as "TOP SECRET//SI//TK//NOFORN", it's pretty clear that would be covered by the above section (as just one example).
You'll note in the statute above, there is no intent required, only gross negligence, which is a pretty easy bar to meet given her knowingly setting up a server that as SoS would receive classified information from time to time.
And this aside from the fact the IG says that she didn't turn over all of the emails she was supposed to, not only can she be hit under 793 for the emails being removed from their "proper place of custody", but also for the destruction of them as well, but also for destruction of the emails under FOIA laws.
No, she can't. She could declassify anything originating from State, but anything coming from another agency she has no authority over.
And yet despite the release of all of Palin's emails, I don't recall a single one being redacted for containing classified information which had been unlawfully stored in an unapproved location.
Nice try at deflection, best try to find a more relevant example to try to excuse bad behavior with.
I did, seeing humor in the URL also is a give away.
Yes, lets prosecute people for crimes they didn't commit.
BTW, the FBI would like to have a chat with you, Mr Coward is it? Something about the Lindberg Baby and JFK assassinations?
You were reading Salon... that's your first mistake.
Oh don't worry, Obama plans to keep them after he leaves office, problem solved.
She was, once.
Somehow she went without retraining/reminding for the final 3 years of her tenure.
Perhaps, though he was at least smart enough to ask for and get immunity from the FBI & DoJ to cooperate with their investigation.
It's actually quite difficult counting the number of bad omens for her we've seen.
Very likely... assuming the FBI & DoJ pass on charging her, which based on available information would be trivial.
*fingers crossed*
It has been reported that the FBI was able to recover the deleted emails... and presumably they recovered more than just the giant binary file which contained the email store, so a more in-depth look at if the server had ever been compromised is probably possible, but we aren't going to know for sure until the FBI talks a bit more publicly.
That is quite clever: https://anti-terrorism.rocks/
Alas they look to be sold out... though I wonder if anti-terrorism rocks are on the TSA prohibited list.
I've a set of rocks I'm selling, they are known to keep tigers away: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Interested?
You assume that they are truly proud of what they have now. Windows 10 (especially on mobile) has been a cluster f. It shipped too early, unpolished and only barley tested (which isn't unexpected when you fire all of your testers the year before).
Pity them. Windows for desktops/laptops/devices is dying and they are desperate to make and/or keep it relevant.
The only money making that happens wrt Windows today and likely in the future is as the backend of Azure... which does sort of make you wonder given their push to CoreCLR (ie not Windows centric), at what point they fire most of the devs behind Windows, put the business into sustained engineering mode and ride the wave until it finally ends (ala Radio Shack).
What motivation?
For the last year or so it's been pretty clear that all they've been trying to do is keep the lights on in the phone side of things while biding their time.
The fact is that Windows 10 Mobile is a disaster. The devices which shipped with 8/8.1 and have been upgraded via the insider program are buggy as hell, and the few devices shipped with it built in have been even worse.
There seems to be a hope that a future 'Surface Phone' will save them, and if they completely shut down phone manufacturing/development, it would be a lot harder to re-spin up should they decide they've got something meaningful to sell.
How cute, you think you bait me into spending any more substantive time on you, despite your continued stalking.
You still are not worth my time.
Dunno about warehouse, but it seems they did purchase 3000 of them: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/n...
Also seems the tanks they used were on loan until the end of the year when there were to be sold to Libya..
The warzone that is Chicago agrees... shame the rest of us won't get onboard with restricting rights in other states so that illegal guns quit killing people on the south-side on their own.
Someone who is unable to pass the required checks to purchase one legally?
There is a reason straw purchases exist.
Also, throw down guns. If you are a cop who has just shot someone who turns out to be unarmed, you may find it useful (though very illegal as well) to have a gun which has no paperwork connection to you that you can throw next to the body and claim the prep was going for it when you shot them,
A proper Russian made or officially licensed AK-47 which supports fully automatic firing? True... it'd take 9-12 months for your NFA paperwork to clear before you could take possession of the rifle.
You can however walk into oodles of gun stores and buy a knock off (AK-47 is probably the most patent infringed firearm in history) or maybe licensed version for a few hundred dollars.
A quick search turns up plenty, take this one which is only a 30 min drive from where I am sitting and the shop looks to close at 8pm today and as an FFL will run a background check on you should you show up to buy it in person.
So yes... you can just go down to the gun store and buy what most people will scream is an AK-47 if they see it: http://i.imgur.com/ueu7x5T.jpg
Or Washington thanks to I-594 and it's requirement for background checks for every 'transfer'... which is poorly defined.
Most states don't 'register' guns, and the feds are barred from doing so (other than NFA items).
Worst case, you make the mistake of buying something new from an FFL, use it in a crime & leave it behind. The PD/BATFE will contact the manufacturer to learn which distributor, then which FFL sold it, and a 'quick' search through mounds of paperwork will turn up who it was sold it and you are going to have a bad day.
A used gun sale at an FFL requires a bit of guessing as to which FFL sold it and when, but still can eventually turn up the last FFL sale (in the area).
No need even for the 'black market' though. In most states, private sales are legal to another person (who resides in the state and is legally able to acquire the firearm), and it doesn't take too much effort to find a seller in your state, meet them in a parking lot, show a drivers license to prove residency, hand over cash and, receive the gun and shake hands... this also is the same source that the many a 'throw down gun' has come from.
The lawyers who have lied in his courtroom have likely been barred from ever arguing before him again... one hopes a President Trump elevates a straight shooting judge like this and further limits the careers of those DoJ folks.
If you bothered to read TFA, you'd see the judge acknowledged he lacks the authority to disbar them. More so, jail risks (largely baseless) screams of "separation of powers!"
The DoJ is however on notice regarding this behavior, setting a fairly clear president of should they fail to act as they are required in this and court rooms of the other 26 plaintiff states.
Most judges don't like being willfully lied to... repeatedly.
Oh no, you will be looking at a contempt charge at a minimum, and much less 'first time' deference when your DUI case is decided.